VS: Political Wars, Voter Fraud and Secret Agendas #139

Georgia
"It is a fraud to conceal a fraud."

o Georgia was called by 11,779 votes.

o Fulton County, Georgia, the most populous county in the state, has no digital
record of all in person votes cast in its original results.

o Not a single ballot purportedly cast during early in-person voting was witnessed
to and signed off by poll managers, as required by Georgia election rules. Seals
were broken and memory cards removed from tabulators for the results of these
315,000 votes, which were printed out on different machines than the ones that
tabulated them. This prevented the reconciliation of how many votes were cast3
on each machine.
o The ballot images of these votes, along with the rest of in-person ballots cast on
Election Day, were destroyed.

o The vote in Georgia was counted three times: the original machine count, a
statewide hand recount, and a second machine count. Each time the state, and
Fulton County, reported three different results.

o Fulton County did not count the same ballots during the original count and the
machine recount. There are 19,541 distinct ballots that appear in one machine
count but not the other.4

o Thousands of fraudulent "presidential only" ballots were injected into the second
machine count, with huge margins favoring Joe Biden. Ballots that are blank5
except for the presidential contest were counted in batches together, with the
pattern appearing in at least eight counties, including Fulton. This means Georgia
did not have the votes to justify its original Election "results."
The second machine count was over 17,000 votes "short." Fulton County was
instructed to "reconcile" the results by the Secretary of State, and recertified its
results without divulging the extent of the vote deficiency to members of the
Fulton County Board of Registrations and Elections.6

o "Thousands of bogus votes" were ultimately added into the Election results via
the second machine count. This includes 20,977 unsubstantiated votes of7
unknown origin. The results were missing 17,852 ballot images, and included8
3,125 duplicate ballot images that were counted twice.

o At least 2,871 ballots were counted two or three times in the second machine
count, totaling 6,118 questionable votes.9

o Eighty-eight percent of Fulton County's precincts reported a different total
number of votes between the first and second machine count.10

o The only electronic votes that survived from the first count were the mail-in
ballots, since they were tabulated on the high speed scanner their ballot images
were automatically uploaded to the election server.

o Ninety percent of these approximately 148,000 absentee ballots cast in Fulton
County cannot be authenticated. Ballot images for 132,284 mail-in votes have no
.SHA file, which is created automatically when a ballot is scanned and used to
authenticate the digital image of the vote, lacking evidence they were scanned
and tabulated properly, or even cast by a real voter.11

o 104,994 ballot image files of these mail-in ballots from the original count
contained identical modified time stamps, suggesting electronic manipulation.12

o Fulton County does not know "how many voters cast votes" and its "lack of
basic accounting controls make it impossible to determine who really won" in
2020, according to Philip Stark, a University of California, Berkeley professor
who invented risk-limiting audits. Stark noted, "The electronic records of the
election are not intact."13

o 376,863 ballot images are missing from the first machine count, which includes
all in-person votes in Fulton County.14

o None of the 315,000 votes cast during early voting in Fulton County were
witnessed to and signed by the poll manager and two poll workers, as required by
state election rules. The closing tapes for these votes are all unsigned, showed15
more tabulated votes than the tabulators had recorded as scanning in their
protective counters, and recorded improbably low percentages for President
Trump. For example, President Trump received only 0.9 percent, 2.4 percent, 3.7
percent from some of the tabulators, as if he was a third party candidate, or in a
third world country. The anomalies indicate ballots were not scanned on the
tabulators that printed the closing tapes, making the closing tapes fraudulent.

o Tabulators used in Fulton County during early voting had their seals broken, and
memory cards were reprogrammed and inserted into different scanners to count
absentee ballots, in violation of election rules. This made it impossible to
reconcile the true number of votes tabulated on the machines from the start of the
Election to the end of counting.16

o 235,000 absentee ballots were requested and accepted too early, prior to the
lawful date 180 days before the 2020 Election, which was May 6, 2020. These
votes should have never been counted in the 2020 Election.17

o 4,081 false votes for Joe Biden were included in the hand count audit results for
Fulton County. The false votes were the result of 36 accounting errors, which18
were confirmed by Governor Brian Kemp's office and investigators working for
Secretary Brad Raffensperger, yet they have never been removed from the
official hand count results. These errors alone would reduce the margin to 7,698
votes.19
o The hand count audit included 3,935 unaccounted for votes due to 11 missing
batch sheets in Fulton County. Differences from the original count to the hand20
audit total at least 15,690 votes, which is more than the entire election margin
alone. This includes the 4,081 false Biden votes, plus "missing" votes discovered
in Gwinett (1,642), Fayette (2,755), Floyd (2,700), Douglas (293), and Walton
(284) counties that were likely due to machine counting errors.21

o Thousands of "pristine," unfolded absentee ballots were counted during the hand
count audit in Fulton County, according to at least six witnesses, which is the
subject of ongoing litigation. These absentee ballots had no folds, and went 98
percent to Joe Biden, had "been added in a fraudulent manner," witnesses said.22

o Fulton County certified 59,143 in-person votes on Election Day, despite the fact
that only 14,152 people had voted as of 5 p.m. on Nov. 3, 2020. Evidence
suggests the in-person vote total on Election Day was inflated by approximately
37,000 votes, as records show no rush to the polls during the final two hours of
voting, and a screenshot of the in-person Election Day results shared by a
government contractor showed only 21,843 people voted at the polls in Fulton
County on Nov. 3.23

o Fulton County ordered over 1 million absentee ballots days before the 2020
Election, without any envelopes and the time necessary to mail. There were only
808,680 active voters in Fulton County as of Nov. 1, 2020, meaning the countyhad more blank mail-in ballots than the number of registered voters, and ordered
them after the vast majority of mail-in ballot requests had already been sent to
voters by Runbeck Election Services.24

o An estimated 30,000 to 92,670 illicit votes were trafficked in Georgia, as part of
a massive ballot trafficking operation discovered by True the Vote. The group
identified 242 traffickers in Georgia who engaged in 5,662 ballot drops into drop
boxes, making an average of 23 runs per trafficker. Over 40 percent of the illicit
drops that were captured on camera were recorded between the non-voting hours
of midnight and 5 a.m.25

o There were over 364,000 ineligible voter registrations on the rolls during the
2020 Election and likely 67,284 votes were cast from voters with invalid
residency.26

o Massive manipulation of the Georgia voter rolls surrounding the 2020 Election
has been uncovered. This includes 1,500 Voter IDs that received credit for voting
in 2020, but were not on any voter rolls from 2020, some appearing for the first
time on the voter rolls on Nov. 4, 2021, a year after the Election. Other findings27
include manipulation of inactive voters to cast ballots, "gifting" Nov. 3 votes up
to 2 years after the Election, and casting votes on ballots previously rejected,
cancelled, or not even turned in.

o In 2020, there were absentee ballots issued to "Bangkok Thailand, Ga.,"
"Denver, Ga.," "Detroit, Ga.," "Los Angeles, Ga.," and other fraudulent
addresses that do not exist. Ballots were fraudulently cast in 2020 from addresses
listed as "Bronx, Ga.," "Hilton Head, Ga.," "Louisville, Ga.," "San Diego, Ga.,"
"New Orleans, Ga.," "French Creek, Ga.," "Virginia Beach, Ga.," "Vicksburg,
Ga.," "Baltimore, Ga.," "New York, Ga.," and "Sarasota, Ga.," all with zip codes
out of state.28

43,907 drop box ballots violated chain of custody requirements in DeKalb
County.29

o 59,000 of the 79,460 drop box ballots in Fulton County were not immediately
transported to the election registrar, in violation of State Election Board rules.30
o An estimated 355,000 ballot transfer forms for drop box ballots are missing
statewide.31

o Over 100,000 tally sheets for Fulton County were missing from the hand count
audit, and remained missing for months after the Election.32

o In early January 2021, Ruby Freeman asked for an attorney because she wanted
to "go live on every platform" to divulge information about how "the USB ports"
were used in the 2020 Election. The expert cyber report by Professor J. Alex33
Halderman explained how external USB ports with election-changing malware
can be inserted into Dominion machines by anyone with access, including
election workers.34

o The presence of a "QR code mismatch" error within the Dominion tabulators that
systematically undercounts votes was found in 65 out of 67 Georgia counties
where records were available. The error was present in system log files fortabulators used in elections in 2020, 2021, and 2022.35
o The election results in Georgia in 2020 are not only unreliable, but were
electronically altered, and are unsupported by the state's own election records.
The appearance of tens of thousands of unconfirmed ballots in subsequent hand
and machine counts suggest reconciliation happened after the Election, meaning
after it was clear what margins were needed to win.

o Fulton County election officials admitted in early 2021 they do not engage in any
reconciliation until weeks after Election Day. This means the number of voters36
showing up at the polls during each day of voting is not checked with the number
of ballots tabulated each day, a basic process to ensure the number of ballots and
voters match, and cannot be manipulated later.

o "We can't start reconciling that until usually a couple days before certification,"
said then-Fulton County Elections Director Richard Barron, during a January
2021 Board meeting. "Because we have to get that report from KnowInk. I think
KnowInk sends those to the state or KnowInk sends those directly to us. But
those aren't compiled then, on Election night. So we don't have any way to
balance those then. That's like the post-election process that we do.

o Wisconsin was called by 20,682 votes.

o The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled drop boxes are illegal under Wisconsin law,
in a 4-3 decision issued in July 2022.37

o Wisconsin Election Commissioner Meagan Wolfe unilaterally declared ballot
drop boxes could be used to vote in 2020 elections, even though "WEC's
commissioners never voted to adopt this memo."38

o Ahead of the November 2020 Election, Wolfe encouraged clerks to use "creative
solutions" to deploy drop boxes, that she said could be "unstaffed." There were
528 drop boxes used in the General Election, and a total of 1,969,274 absentee
votes cast, including 1,346,731 votes cast by mail, and 653,236 in-person.39

o In a concurring opinion to the ruling finding drop boxes to be unlawful, Justice
Rebecca Bradley writes, "If the right to vote is to have any meaning at all,
elections must be conducted according to law. Throughout history, tyrants have
claimed electoral victory via elections conducted in violation of governing law...
in Wisconsin elected officials "deriv[e] their just powers from the consent of the
governed."

o "The right to vote presupposes the rule of law governs elections. If elections are
conducted outside of the law, the people have not conferred their consent on the
government. Such elections are unlawful and their results are illegitimate."

o Justice Bradley concluded "thousands of votes have been cast via this unlawful
method," using drop boxes, "thereby directly harming the Wisconsin voters."

o "The illegality of these drop boxes weakens the people's faith that the election
produced an outcome reflective of their will," Justice Bradley writes. "The
Wisconsin voters, and all lawful voters, are injured when the institution charged
with administering Wisconsin elections does not follow the law, leaving the
results in question...Electoral outcomes obtained by unlawful procedures corrupt
the institution of voting, degrading the very foundation of free government.
Unlawful votes do not dilute lawful votes so much as they pollute them, which in
turn pollutes the integrity of the results."

o In the city of Milwaukee, nearly half of all its votes were cast by mail, totaling
217,424 ballots. The city deployed 15 drop boxes, with election officials
claiming the drop boxes would be "under 24-hour surveillance." However,40
after the election, not a single municipality in the county produced video
surveillance of drop boxes in response to open records requests. Various
responses included, "No records exist for your request," "No video from
requested time frame," "No such records exist," and "No security camera."41

o The election integrity group True the Vote identified 107 ballot traffickers in
Milwaukee County between Oct. 20 and Nov. 3, 2020, who each made 20 or
more visits to drop boxes. Each trafficker made an average 26 visits, and as42
many as 15 in one day, and made multiple visits to non-governmental
organizations.

o The 107 traffickers made a total of 2,824 trips to drop boxes during the 2020
Election, with a majority of visits occurring after 8:00 p.m.

o In 2020 there was a surge of "indefinitely confined" votes in Wisconsin, resulting
in 220,404 votes cast from individuals who were exempted from showing voter
ID. This surge of suspect votes was due to Democrat election clerks giving
advice that was deemed illegal after the election, instructing voters to identify
themselves as disabled during the COVID pandemic to avoid voter ID laws.
Indefinitely confined voters, who are supposed to be physically unable to go to
the polls due to age, disability, or illness, increased by an astounding 393 percent
in Dane County from 2016 to 2020; 492 percent in Racine County; 281 percent
in Milwaukee County; and 287 percent in the state overall.

o There were just 56,978 indefinitely confined votes in 2016, and roughly 70,00043
in 2019. In 2020, however, there were 220,404 votes cast using indefinite
confinement status. Over 77 percent of these individuals had never been listed as
indefinitely confined before. The Wisconsin Legislative Audit Bureau identified
48,554 people who voted as indefinitely confined in November 2020 who had
never provided photo identification or did not have photo identifications on file
with clerks, which is more than twice the vote margin of 20,682.

o Scott McDonell, the Democrat clerk of Dane County, which encompasses the
area of Madison, told all residents they could identify themselves as indefinitely
confined because of COVID, specifically citing it as a way to get around the
Voter ID law.

o McDonell previously blamed Wisconsin's voter ID law for President Trump's
victory in 2016, claiming in a 2018 Twitter post that "thousands of voters [were]
deterred from voting due to [the] ID law."44

o In 2020, McDonell urged all voters to declare themselves indefinitely confined in
order to obtain an absentee ballot and "skip the step of uploading an ID" in the
April 2020 primary election. Once a voter is identified as indefinitely confined,
they continue to receive absentee ballots automatically for subsequent elections.
"I urge all voters who request a ballot and have trouble presenting a valid ID to
indicate that they are indefinitely confined," McDonell said in a Facebook post.

o The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled in December 2020 that the pandemic "did
not render all Wisconsin electors 'indefinitely confined,' thereby obviating the
requirement of a valid photo identification to obtain an absentee ballot," and the
clerks' "interpretation of Wisconsin election laws was erroneous."45

Wantie	donderdag 22 februari 2024 @ 12:08
	Welkom! In dit topic kan een verscheidenheid aan onderwerpen worden besproken rondom de Amerikaanse politiek door een BNW-lens. Speculaties en het delen van theorieėn over de Amerikaanse politiek wordt gewaardeerd, haatspraak of het beledigen van mensen wordt hier conform de FOK!policy geweerd. Welke dubbele agenda's houdt de politieke elite er op na en met welk doel? Is er echt gefraudeerd in de presidentsverkiezingen van 2020? Worden de VS de opiatencrisis nog de baas? Waarom is er zo vaak geprobeerd om berichtgeving op Twitter aan te passen om de publieke opinie te beļnvloeden? Wordt Ron De Santis kandidaat voor de presidentsverkiezingen in 2024 of weet Donald Trump dat te voorkomen? Maakt Kamala Harris kans om in 2024 de eerste vrouwelijke president te worden of gaat Biden door tot zijn 90e? Houdt het tweede amendement van de Grondwet stand? Bespreek het hier!
Kijkertje	donderdag 22 februari 2024 @ 17:04
	Het 'observeerbare': twitter
UncleScorp	donderdag 22 februari 2024 @ 17:29
	quote: Op donderdag 22 februari 2024 17:04 schreef Kijkertje het volgende: Het 'observeerbare': [x]https://twitter.com/BidenHQ/status/1760475337912172621[/x] Vraagje Is er een alternatief voor Biden? Wat als die uit de race valt? Ik volg het nl niet zo hard die clownshow. Toch niet Kamala mag ik hopen
Wantie	donderdag 22 februari 2024 @ 19:06
	quote: Op donderdag 22 februari 2024 17:29 schreef UncleScorp het volgende: [..] Vraagje Is er een alternatief voor Biden? Wat als die uit de race valt? Ik volg het nl niet zo hard die clownshow. Toch niet Kamala mag ik hopen Hoeveel inwoners heeft de VS? Het gaat goed mis als daar niet iets beters tussen te vinden dan Trump of Biden.
FLATTTENtheCURVE	donderdag 22 februari 2024 @ 19:23
	Why Are There 30 Cuts In This 2 Minute Biden Speech? He can’t talk for more than 5 seconds. The video shows Biden making a short speech about NATO, and remarkably he doesn’t slur a single word or struggle to read his script as he does in every other situation. Of course, it’s a pre-recorded video so they’re not going to leave in mistakes. However, it is the sheer amount of cuts that has people asking the question, is he capable of completing more than one sentence at a time? It doesn’t seem that way. twitter Here's what Biden normally sounds like: twitter https://modernity.news/20(...)minute-biden-speech/
UncleScorp	donderdag 22 februari 2024 @ 19:49
	quote: Op donderdag 22 februari 2024 19:23 schreef FLATTTENtheCURVE het volgende: Ik zat te wachten op een 2 uur durend interview met Tucker Carlson Daar heeft Biden ook recht ook recht op
ems.	donderdag 22 februari 2024 @ 20:18
	quote: Op donderdag 22 februari 2024 17:29 schreef UncleScorp het volgende: [..] Ik volg het nl niet zo hard die clownshow. Haha. Dat doe je wel.
ATuin-hek	vrijdag 23 februari 2024 @ 11:30
	Trump kan nu veroordeeld fraudeur toevoegen aan zijn veroordeling voor sexual assault. Zou het iets uitmaken voor de stemmers?
Glazenmaker	zaterdag 24 februari 2024 @ 07:29
	quote: Op vrijdag 23 februari 2024 11:30 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende: Trump kan nu veroordeeld fraudeur toevoegen aan zijn veroordeling voor sexual assault. Zou het iets uitmaken voor de stemmers? Natuurlijk niet.
Glazenmaker	zaterdag 24 februari 2024 @ 07:32
	quote: Op donderdag 22 februari 2024 17:04 schreef Kijkertje het volgende: Het 'observeerbare': [ x ] Klinkt als een realistische weergave van zijn volgende presidentschap. Na zijn vorige powerful crime van verkiezingsfraude waren er honderdduizenden proud genoeg om Capitol agenten te vermoorden.
Wantie	zaterdag 24 februari 2024 @ 08:10
	quote: Op zaterdag 24 februari 2024 07:32 schreef Glazenmaker het volgende: [..] Klinkt als een realistische weergave van zijn volgende presidentschap. Na zijn vorige powerful crime van verkiezingsfraude waren er honderdduizenden proud genoeg om Capitol agenten te vermoorden. Maar dat is al 4 jaar geleden, dus een oude koe uit de sloot. Dat kunnen we Trump nu moeilijk aanrekenen.
Glazenmaker	zaterdag 24 februari 2024 @ 08:58
	quote: Op zaterdag 24 februari 2024 08:10 schreef Wantie het volgende: [..] Maar dat is al 4 jaar geleden, dus een oude koe uit de sloot. Dat kunnen we Trump nu moeilijk aanrekenen. Ja want hij was toen jong en ongeremd.
Wantie	zaterdag 24 februari 2024 @ 10:01
	quote: Op zaterdag 24 februari 2024 08:58 schreef Glazenmaker het volgende: [..] Ja want hij was toen jong en ongeremd. Ja, een jeugdzonde, zo'n bestorming van het Capitool. Dat stelt niets voor... Ik vind de argumentatie altijd heel bijzonder: 'Murica bad, behalve Trump'. Die kan geen fouten maken en gaat ons redden van alle ellende in de wereld...
HowardRoark	zaterdag 24 februari 2024 @ 10:16
	Ik blijf mij afvragen, stel dat het nu Nikki Haley was geweest en niet Trump die de Republikeinse presidentskandidaat zou zijn. Wat hadden alle media en online activisten dan moeten aangrijpen om haar in een negatief daglicht te zetten? De paniek was groot geweest. Met Trump is het allemaal makkelijk en voorspelbaar, met Haley had men een flink probleem gehad.
Wantie	zaterdag 24 februari 2024 @ 10:59
	quote: Op zaterdag 24 februari 2024 10:16 schreef HowardRoark het volgende: Ik blijf mij afvragen, stel dat het nu Nikki Haley was geweest en niet Trump die de Republikeinse presidentskandidaat zou zijn. Wat hadden alle media en online activisten dan moeten aangrijpen om haar in een negatief daglicht te zetten? De paniek was groot geweest. Met Trump is het allemaal makkelijk en voorspelbaar, met Haley had men een flink probleem gehad. Dan is de vraag des te groter dat er voor Trump is gekozen, in plaats van een meer integere kandidaat. Los van de vraag waarom Trump fans geen waarde hechten aan de integriteit van een president
Glazenmaker	zaterdag 24 februari 2024 @ 18:33
	quote: Op zaterdag 24 februari 2024 10:16 schreef HowardRoark het volgende: Ik blijf mij afvragen, stel dat het nu Nikki Haley was geweest en niet Trump die de Republikeinse presidentskandidaat zou zijn. Wat hadden alle media en online activisten dan moeten aangrijpen om haar in een negatief daglicht te zetten? De paniek was groot geweest. Met Trump is het allemaal makkelijk en voorspelbaar, met Haley had men een flink probleem gehad. Ik vind dit toch wel zo'n wonderlijke gedachtengang. Oprechte vraag: verbaas jij je ook wel eens waarom je zo weinig positieve berichten over Marc Dutroux en Osama leest in de media?
Kijkertje	zondag 25 februari 2024 @ 03:26
	Iemand 'in een negatief daglicht zetten' is ook meer de werkwijze van MAGA-volk. Uiteraard Biden... twitter ... maar ook Nikki Haley: twitter [ Bericht 36% gewijzigd door Kijkertje op 25-02-2024 06:26:03 ]
Kijkertje	zondag 25 februari 2024 @ 05:59
	twitter Dit soort mensen
Kijkertje	zondag 25 februari 2024 @ 06:47
	twitter twitter [ Bericht 31% gewijzigd door Kijkertje op 25-02-2024 06:54:02 ]
ATuin-hek	zondag 25 februari 2024 @ 07:01
	quote: Op zaterdag 24 februari 2024 10:16 schreef HowardRoark het volgende: Ik blijf mij afvragen, stel dat het nu Nikki Haley was geweest en niet Trump die de Republikeinse presidentskandidaat zou zijn. Wat hadden alle media en online activisten dan moeten aangrijpen om haar in een negatief daglicht te zetten? De paniek was groot geweest. Met Trump is het allemaal makkelijk en voorspelbaar, met Haley had men een flink probleem gehad. Het is voorspelbaar dat Trump dingen doet die niet door de beugel kunnen ja, en daar bericht de pers natuurlijk over. Of zie jij dat anders?