Iedereen zou zich verheven moeten voelen over gasten als jijzelf die alleen maar gaslighten en projecteren op anderen.quote:Op zondag 21 april 2019 22:25 schreef Ensiferum het volgende:
[..]
De waarheid raakt altijd een gevoelige snaar bij hen die zich verheven voelen boven anderen. De confrontatie met de realiteit wekt de agressieve respons, want het ideale zelfbeeld komt niet overeen met de morele verdorvenheid die men in werkelijkheid bezit.
quote:Op maandag 22 april 2019 21:02 schreef capricia het volgende:
Je zult even geduld moeten hebben voor een antwoord.
Was jij geen mod?quote:
Echt menselijk volk, dat GOP spul...quote:In recent months, the Trump administration has taken a hard line, refusing to agree to any UN documents that refer to sexual or reproductive health, on grounds that such language implies support for abortions. It has also opposed the use of the word “gender”, seeking it as a cover for liberal promotion of transgender rights.
twitter:NatashaBertrand twitterde op maandag 22-04-2019 om 23:05:02Breaking now: @RepJerryNadler has subpoenaed Don McGahn. https://t.co/0eMlT9167r reageer retweet
twitter:tedlieu twitterde op dinsdag 23-04-2019 om 02:53:24One reason we want Don McGahn to testify under oath is because the Obstruction of Justice law is broad. A person is guilty merely for "endeavoring" to obstruct justice with corrupt intent. Giving an order to obstruct justice violates the law even if the order is not carried out. https://t.co/bfldp1fysC reageer retweet
Russia “Previewed” Plan to Disseminate Emails with Trump Campaigntwitter:rgoodlaw twitterde op maandag 22-04-2019 om 18:02:12Big item in #MuellerReport:Russians didn't just tell Papadopoulos they had emails on Clinton. They PREVIEWED their plan for "anonymous release."And who was one member of Congress who informed the public?Video, transcript: @RepAdamSchiff @chrislhayes https://t.co/BYQbjMUOxM reageer retweet
quote:A significant recent revelation in the Russia investigation has been largely overlooked in the rush of several breaking news stories over the past few days. A nugget of information is contained in the memo written by Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee (the so-called Schiff Memo), which was released on Saturday morning.
Prior to the memo, we knew that a Russian agent told Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos of “Moscow possessing ‘dirt’” on Hillary Clinton “in the form of ‘thousands of emails,’” according to Papadopoulos’s plea statement. The memo went a legally significant step further. As Rep. Adam Schiff recently told Chris Hayes, “our memo discloses for the first time that the Russians preview to Papadopoulos that they could help with disseminating these stolen emails.” Rep. Schiff added, “When Donald Trump openly called on the Russians to hack Hillary Clinton’s emails, they’d be richly rewarded if they released these to the press, his campaign had already been put on notice that the Russians were prepared to do just that and disseminate these stolen emails.” (The full transcript and video clip is below.)
This new revelation is legally important and, if true, could have exposed Papadopoulos and potentially other campaign officials to significant criminal liability. I spoke with several leading experts in campaign finance law and former federal prosecutors to gather their views.
Rep. Schiff’s statement adds clarity to two stray statements in the memo itself. The memo states, “Russian agents previewed their hack and dissemination of stolen emails.” The memo also refers to this part of the record in stating, “We would later learn in Papadopoulos’s plea that that[sic] the information the Russians could assist by anonymously releasing were thousands of Hillary Clinton emails.”Full text of Rep. Schiff’s remarks on All In with Chris Hayes:SPOILEROm spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.
REP. SCHIFF: “It’s also I think significant that our memo discloses for the first time that the Russians previewed to Papadopoulos that they could help with disseminating these stolen emails. So weeks later when Don Jr. goes into that meeting, when he writes back to those offering dirt on Hillary Clinton, he says, ‘If it’s what I think it is, I would love it.’ And we now know and we can talk publicly about that fact that the campaign, at least George Papadopoulos, was aware both that the Russians had these stolen emails and that they were prepared to help with the dissemination of those emails.”
HAYES: “That was one of several things that stuck out to me. Can you speak a little bit more about that? We know that there was this sort of cut out figure that was telling him that the Russians had the emails. Tell us, what did they say further about help in disseminating them?”
REP. SCHIFF: “Well, unfortunately, I can’t go beyond what the Department of Justice has authorized us to disclose in the memo, but I think it’s the first time the public’s been able to see one of the links here. And that is we knew from the Papadopoulos plea that the Russians had told the Trump campaign very early on in April 2016 that they were in possession of these stolen emails. We now know that the Department of Justice presented to the FISA Court information that the Russians previewed what they would do with this information, their dissemination of it. So when Donald Trump openly called on the Russians to hack Hillary Clinton’s emails, they’d be richly rewarded if they released these to the press, his campaign had already been put on notice that the Russians were prepared to do just that and disseminate these stolen emails.”
[ Bericht 2% gewijzigd door Kijkertje op 23-04-2019 00:42:12 ]“The fundamental cause of the trouble in the modern world today is that the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.”— Bertrand Russell
twitter:TCleveland4Real twitterde op maandag 22-04-2019 om 18:59:17I haven't seen this emphasized enough. The President attempted to stop any investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election, not only any investigation into his campaign or himself. He wanted to stop the investigation of a criminal espionage operation of a foreign power https://t.co/HPXbM66yb2 reageer retweet
Fout besluit imhotwitter:kyledcheney twitterde op dinsdag 23-04-2019 om 00:48:10NEW: PELOSI once again rejected calls to launch impeachment proceedings in the aftermath of special counsel Mueller's report. A few new Dems are speaking up to demand it, but leaders aren't ready to budget. with #HeatherScoop @heatherscope and @desiderioDC https://t.co/YCOfFD02Qo reageer retweet
quote:House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told lawmakers Monday that there are no plans to immediately open impeachment proceedings against President Trump, rejecting calls from several Democrats to initiate steps to try to oust the president.
In a rare Monday night conference call, the California Democrat stressed that the near-term strategy in the wake of special counsel Robert S. Mueller III's report is to focus on investigating the president and seeing where the inquiries lead. Members of Pelosi's leadership team reaffirmed her cautious approach, according to four officials on the call who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations.
"We have to save our democracy. This isn't about Democrats or Republicans. It's about saving our democracy," Pelosi said.
But Pelosi's message did not go over well with several Democrats, who argued that Congress has a duty to hold Trump to account with impeachment despite the political blowback Pelosi has long feared.
Rep. Val Demings (D-Fla.), a member of the House Judiciary Committee, argued that as someone with more than 25 years of experience in law enforcement, she thought the House had enough evidence to proceed.
"While I understand we need to see the full report and all supporting documents, I believe we have enough evidence now," Demings said.
Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.) said the party has a duty to openly discuss the downside of not impeaching Trump for his actions and the precedent it could set for the future.SPOILEROm spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.
[ Bericht 39% gewijzigd door Kijkertje op 23-04-2019 03:04:59 ]“The fundamental cause of the trouble in the modern world today is that the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.”— Bertrand Russell
Een impeachement procedure zou zoals ze het de vorige keer aangaf het land verdelen in twee kampen en voor stevige onrust onder de bevolking zorgen.quote:Op dinsdag 23 april 2019 02:28 schreef Kijkertje het volgende:
Fout besluit imhotwitter:kyledcheney twitterde op dinsdag 23-04-2019 om 00:48:10NEW: PELOSI once again rejected calls to launch impeachment proceedings in the aftermath of special counsel Mueller's report. A few new Dems are speaking up to demand it, but leaders aren't ready to budget. with #HeatherScoop @:heatherscope and @:desiderioDC https://t.co/YCOfFD02Qo reageer retweet
House Democratic leaders say no immediate plans to open impeachment proceedings against Trump
[..]
Eigenlijk zou Trump al zijn eigen speeches moeten schrijven, dan krijg je toch wat prachtige stukken.quote:Op dinsdag 23 april 2019 00:50 schreef Kijkertje het volgende:
[ afbeelding ]twitter:TCleveland4Real twitterde op maandag 22-04-2019 om 18:59:17I haven't seen this emphasized enough. The President attempted to stop any investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election, not only any investigation into his campaign or himself. He wanted to stop the investigation of a criminal espionage operation of a foreign power https://t.co/HPXbM66yb2 reageer retweet
Trump heeft dus geprobeerd om het Mueller-onderzoek alleen maar over inmenging in toekomstige verkiezingen te laten gaan
![]()
Dat hij een ordinaire hoerenloper is kon hij natuurlijk niet ontkennen. Gelukkig hebben we de foto's nog.quote:Op maandag 22 april 2019 16:40 schreef Ulx het volgende:
Bovendien loog Trump er ook op los over zijn affaires.
Hij was dan ook niet erg geschikt voor die rol.quote:Op maandag 22 april 2019 18:27 schreef Ulx het volgende:
Cain trekt zich terug.twitter:realDonaldTrump twitterde op maandag 22-04-2019 om 18:16:38My friend Herman Cain, a truly wonderful man, has asked me not to nominate him for a seat on the Federal Reserve Board. I will respect his wishes. Herman is a great American who truly loves our Country! reageer retweet
Én Mike Pence een kans geven die hij beslist niet verdiend.quote:Op dinsdag 23 april 2019 08:08 schreef Beathoven het volgende:
[..]
Een impeachement procedure zou zoals ze het de vorige keer aangaf het land verdelen in twee kampen en voor stevige onrust onder de bevolking zorgen.
Dat is waar. Goddank dat men de huidige eenheid niet in gevaar wil brengen.quote:Op dinsdag 23 april 2019 08:08 schreef Beathoven het volgende:
[..]
Een impeachement procedure zou zoals ze het de vorige keer aangaf het land verdelen in twee kampen en voor stevige onrust onder de bevolking zorgen.
twitter:415holgate twitterde op maandag 22-04-2019 om 01:44:23Rex Tillerson says Trump ‘asked him to do illegal things’ as secretary of state https://t.co/HoPth77u1s reageer retweet
quote:Op dinsdag 23 april 2019 08:50 schreef Ulx het volgende:
[..]
Dat is waar. Goddank dat men de huidige eenheid niet in gevaar wil brengen.
Uit het Mueller-rapport blijkt dat Trump structureel liegt, heeft getracht obstructie te plegen en pogingen ondernam om getuigen te beïnvloeden. Dergelijke gedragingen maken hem ongeschikt voor het ambt. Er is dus zeker grond voor een impeachment-procedure.quote:Op dinsdag 23 april 2019 09:08 schreef Vader_Aardbei het volgende:
Nou, kom maar op met die impeachment op basis van het tegenwerken van een onderzoek waarvan de conclusie was, zoals we nu weten, dat Trump niet samenwerkte met de Russen.Ze denken niet serieus dat dit kans van slagen heeft?
De Democraten maken zich compleet belachelijk. Moeilijk om je verlies te erkennen, blijkbaar.
Dat was de conclusie niet. Dat maken jij en andere Trump supporters er van.quote:Op dinsdag 23 april 2019 09:08 schreef Vader_Aardbei het volgende:
Nou, kom maar op met die impeachment op basis van het tegenwerken van een onderzoek waarvan de conclusie was, zoals we nu weten, dat Trump niet samenwerkte met de Russen.![]()
Wauwtwitter:Megankstack twitterde op dinsdag 23-04-2019 om 08:41:47The US wants to veto a UN resolution against rape as a weapon of war because it refers to "sexual and reproductive health." As in, uses the words. Which the Trump administration now regards as taboo. Because "such language implies support for abortion."https://t.co/5Wd0UwRX2a reageer retweet
Heel goed punt.quote:Op dinsdag 23 april 2019 09:24 schreef Ludachrist het volgende:
Moet je je toch voorstellen dat je een president hebt die zelfs een onderzoek naar iets waarvan hij zelf weet dat hij onschuldig is gaat lopen dwarsbomen.
Dat zou toch wel wat vraagtekens moeten oproepen over hoe nauw Trump het met de wet neemt.
Die had ik gisteravond gepost, vind het echt ongelooflijk dat een handjevol evangelicals met Trump aan de macht nu zo makkelijk hun wil zelfs internationaal door kunnen drukken, zelfs als het om oorlogsmisdaden gaat...quote:Op dinsdag 23 april 2019 09:35 schreef Ulx het volgende:
Wauwtwitter:Megankstack twitterde op dinsdag 23-04-2019 om 08:41:47The US wants to veto a UN resolution against rape as a weapon of war because it refers to "sexual and reproductive health." As in, uses the words. Which the Trump administration now regards as taboo. Because "such language implies support for abortion."https://t.co/5Wd0UwRX2a reageer retweet
| Forum Opties | |
|---|---|
| Forumhop: | |
| Hop naar: | |