twitter:ddale8 twitterde op donderdag 18-04-2019 om 15:57:54Asked why Mueller isn't here, given that it's his report we're discussing, Barr says, "No it's not. It's a report he did for me as the attorney general. He is required under the regulation to provide me with a confidential report. I'm here to discuss my response to that report." reageer retweet
twitter:kylegriffin1 twitterde op donderdag 18-04-2019 om 16:00:18Neal Katyal on Barr's 'no collusion' remarks: "It sounded like a spokesman. Not an attorney general." He says that Barr 'parroted' a Trump talking point. @MSNBC reageer retweet
twitter:RepJerryNadler twitterde op donderdag 18-04-2019 om 16:03:38It is clear Congress and the American people must hear from Special Counsel Robert Mueller in person to better understand his findings. We are now requesting Mueller to appear before @HouseJudiciary as soon as possible. https://t.co/Mmo6PA4KPt reageer retweet
SPOILEROm spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.“The fundamental cause of the trouble in the modern world today is that the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.”— Bertrand Russell
twitter:grynbaum twitterde op donderdag 18-04-2019 om 16:02:24Chris Wallace on Fox: "The Attorney General seemed almost to be acting as the counselor for the defense, the counselor for the president, rather than the Attorney General, talking about his motives, his emotions... Really, as I say, making a case for the president." reageer retweet
Ach, dat is Chris Wallace, die is nog redelijk neutraal. Je krijgt vanavond bij de Hannity's, Carlsons en Ingrahams van deze wereld gewoon weer te horen dat er volledige vrijspraak is op alle aanklachten en dat de Witch Hunt van de Democraten eens goed onderzocht moet gaan worden.quote:Op donderdag 18 april 2019 16:15 schreef Kijkertje het volgende:
Zelfs Fox News:twitter:grynbaum twitterde op donderdag 18-04-2019 om 16:02:24Chris Wallace on Fox: "The Attorney General seemed almost to be acting as the counselor for the defense, the counselor for the president, rather than the Attorney General, talking about his motives, his emotions... Really, as I say, making a case for the president." reageer retweet
I know maar er is geen weldenkend mens die deze mensen serieus neemtquote:Op donderdag 18 april 2019 16:18 schreef Ludachrist het volgende:
[..]
Ach, dat is Chris Wallace, die is nog redelijk neutraal. Je krijgt vanavond bij de Hannity's, Carlsons en Ingrahams van deze wereld gewoon weer te horen dat er volledige vrijspraak is op alle aanklachten en dat de Witch Hunt van de Democraten eens goed onderzocht moet gaan worden.
Tientallen miljoenen Amerikanen wel. Met stemrecht...quote:Op donderdag 18 april 2019 16:23 schreef Kijkertje het volgende:
[..]
I know maar er is geen weldenkend mens die deze mensen serieus neemt
twitter:kylegriffin1 twitterde op donderdag 18-04-2019 om 16:40:25Nicolle Wallace: "Why have we heard from Barr five times if the Mueller report is so awesome for Donald Trump? We have now heard from someone who is a human shield of Mueller's findings five times. If Mueller exonerated Trump ... why have we heard from Barr five times?" @MSNBC reageer retweet
Bedankt voor je trolpoging.quote:Op donderdag 18 april 2019 16:52 schreef Ensiferum het volgende:
En als Mueller niets belastends over Trump zegt voor het Congres, geloven jullie het dan?
Oh nee wach, Mueller was al corrupt toch?
Mueller is een belangenverstrengelde Boze Democraat toch?quote:Op donderdag 18 april 2019 16:52 schreef Ensiferum het volgende:
En als Mueller niets belastends over Trump zegt voor het Congres, geloven jullie het dan?
Oh nee wach, Mueller was al corrupt toch?
twitter:AshaRangappa_ twitterde op donderdag 18-04-2019 om 16:40:39Note: Barr conflated the term "collusion" with "conspiracy." The former describes a kind of behavior (secret coordinated activity for a common goal) and the latter is a narrowly defined crime. Actions that do not meet the criminal definition of "conspiracy" can still be collusion reageer retweet
twitter:AshaRangappa_ twitterde op donderdag 18-04-2019 om 16:45:12To wit: If members of Trump's campaign were coordinating with Wikileaks to disseminate emails harmful to HRC to benefit Trump, it is of no moment that such activity could not be charged as conspiracy...IT IS STILL COLLUSION WITH AN INTELLIGENCE ARM OF A HOSTILE FOREIGN ADVERSARY reageer retweet
twitter:brianbeutler twitterde op donderdag 18-04-2019 om 16:57:21This has been the whole shebang for nearly two years. We established collusion a long time ago. We were waiting on Mueller to tell us whether any of that collusive behavior amounted to a provable criminal conspiracy. https://t.co/ZE6VgX6U7f reageer retweet
twitter:edokeefe twitterde op donderdag 18-04-2019 om 17:04:50READ IT FOR YOURSELF: The Mueller Report, as redacted by the Attorney General: https://t.co/10pjeUkDcj reageer retweet
twitter:kylegriffin1 twitterde op donderdag 18-04-2019 om 17:12:12Breaking on @MSNBC: NBC's @JuliaEAinsley reports that, according to the report, Robert Mueller did consult the Office of Legal Counsel opinion that you cannot indict a sitting president. She notes that that counters what Barr said earlier. reageer retweet
twitter:ddale8 twitterde op donderdag 18-04-2019 om 17:13:13The Mueller report says that the lies to Congress and to the special counsel from "several individuals affiliated with the Trump Campaign" "materially impaired the investigation of Russian election interference." reageer retweet
twitter:ddale8 twitterde op donderdag 18-04-2019 om 17:15:54The report also says that people being investigated, "including some associated with the Trump Campaign," "deleted relevant communications." The report says there are "gaps" in the special counsel's knowledge, and they can't "rule out the possibility" that there is more. reageer retweet
Nee Mueller is een Republikeinquote:Op donderdag 18 april 2019 16:57 schreef Montov het volgende:
[..]
Mueller is een belangenverstrengelde Boze Democraat toch?
Ho ho, dit gaat voor eeuwig door want, zoals je ook kan zien hier, zullen velen voor altijd in de ontkenning zitten. Zelfs als Schiff en Swalwell de bak in zouden draaien.quote:Op donderdag 18 april 2019 17:17 schreef Vader_Aardbei het volgende:
Heerlijk dit. No collusion, no obstruction! Eindelijk is de heksenjacht ten einde.
Nu wordt het tijd om de aanstichters te vervolgen. Laten we beginnen met Adam Schiff.
twitter:SethAbramson twitterde op donderdag 18-04-2019 om 17:21:23100/ The report *explicitly says* that "did not establish" does *not* mean "there was no evidence."Wow. Mueller anticipated the Trump-Barr line of political rhetoric and fully defused it in the first *two pages* of his Report. That's something *else* we never heard from Barr. reageer retweet
| Forum Opties | |
|---|---|
| Forumhop: | |
| Hop naar: | |