POL Politiek
Discussies en diepgaande gesprekken over de politiek in de breedste zin van het woord kun je hier voeren.
Wat de neuk zijn 'collectieve goederen en diensten'? Ik vind het allemaal best, zo lang het maar vrijwillig gebeurt.quote:Op maandag 13 juni 2016 21:57 schreef hoink581 het volgende:
[..]
Collectieve goederen en diensten moeten worden betaald uit welke gezamenlijke portemonnee?
As the officer took her away, she recalled that she asked,
"Why do you push us around?"
And she remembered him saying,
"I don't know, but the law's the law, and you're under arrest."
"Why do you push us around?"
And she remembered him saying,
"I don't know, but the law's the law, and you're under arrest."
Betaal er net zo voor als voor het brood bij de bakker. Pinnen of contant.quote:
[..]
Collectieve goederen en diensten moeten worden betaald uit welke gezamenlijke portemonnee?
a man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still
Infrastructuur o.a.quote:Op maandag 13 juni 2016 21:58 schreef heiden6 het volgende:
Wat de neuk zijn 'collectieve goederen en diensten'? Ik vind het allemaal best, zo lang het maar vrijwillig gebeurt.
Vrijheid blijheid is in theorie een mooi streven, maar verregaande vrijblijvendheid is onhaalbaar in de praktijk.
Voor een openbare weg ja?quote:Op maandag 13 juni 2016 22:00 schreef Paper_Tiger het volgende:
Betaal er net zo voor als voor het brood bij de bakker. Pinnen of contant.
quote:
[..]
Betaal er net zo voor als voor het brood bij de bakker. Pinnen of contant.
As the officer took her away, she recalled that she asked,
"Why do you push us around?"
And she remembered him saying,
"I don't know, but the law's the law, and you're under arrest."
"Why do you push us around?"
And she remembered him saying,
"I don't know, but the law's the law, and you're under arrest."
Op
Niet als het de kosten va aanleg en onderhoud van wegen dekt. Als je brood koopt bij de bakker is dat toch ook gewoon consumptie?quote:
Op
a man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still
daar betaal je ook belasting over, namelijk BTWquote:
[..]
Niet als het de kosten va aanleg en onderhoud van wegen dekt. Als je brood koopt bij de bakker is dat toch ook gewoon consumptie?
Lekker consistent weer idd.quote:
POL / Pessimisme en liberalisme
Shoppen in standpunten heet dat.
[ Bericht 14% gewijzigd door Klopkoek op 14-06-2016 08:25:51 ]
Deuger & Gutmensch
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
Je stopt niet met betalen wanneer de kosten gedekt zijn.quote:
Niet als het de kosten va aanleg en onderhoud van wegen dekt. Als je brood koopt bij de bakker is dat toch ook gewoon consumptie?
Neeneenee. Ouderwetsche tolpoortjes graag. Met slagbomen en alle toeters en bellen.quote:
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
Wel grappig dat (semi-)rechtse schreeuwers als Hartman met dit soort teksten komen
Heeft een hoop van Hans Teeuwen afgekeken trouwens
Heeft een hoop van Hans Teeuwen afgekeken trouwens
Deuger & Gutmensch
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
Hartman is een troll. Niet links, niet rechts, uberhaupt niet politiek, gewoon een troll. En verdient daar geld mee. 
Mmm ja. Die lompheid en machismo doet wel heel erg GeenStijl en Hans Teeuwen achtig aan. Kantoren slopen en mensen naar beneden halen.quote:
Hartman is een troll. Niet links, niet rechts, uberhaupt niet politiek, gewoon een troll. En verdient daar geld mee.
Zijn eerdere programma's bij VPRO hadden nog een cultureel verantwoord tintje en ging niet ten koste van anderen (en zeker niet bij niet-BNers).
Deuger & Gutmensch
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
Jawel joh, beetje crypto-fascistisch/Übermensch-achtig. Al mag ik hem wel.quote:
Hartman is een troll. Niet links, niet rechts, uberhaupt niet politiek, gewoon een troll. En verdient daar geld mee.
''Aquila non capit muscas.''
Hier dan ook maar
http://www.volkskrant.nl/(...)nkse-media~a3721786/
http://www.volkskrant.nl/(...)an-de-media~a722413/
https://georgeknightlang.(...)zijn-ze-zijn-rechts/
https://www.groene.nl/artikel/de-ruk-naar-rechts
http://www.volkskrant.nl/(...)nkse-media~a3721786/
http://www.volkskrant.nl/(...)an-de-media~a722413/
https://georgeknightlang.(...)zijn-ze-zijn-rechts/
https://www.groene.nl/artikel/de-ruk-naar-rechts
Deuger & Gutmensch
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
https://www.psychologiema(...)e-steeds-slimmer.htmquote:Worden we steeds slimmer?
Vergeleken met onze overgrootouders zijn wij hoogbegaafd. Bij IQ-tests scoren wij namelijk zo’n 30 punten hoger dan zij. Hoe valt dat te verklaren?
Wat is de overeenkomst tussen een hond en een haas? Die vraag kwam al in 1943 voor in verschillende intelligentietests. Deelnemers gingen vaak de fout in. ‘Deze dieren spelen allebei een rol bij de jacht, want de hond jaagt op de haas’ vulden ze vaak in. Vandaag de dag beantwoordt bijna iedereen de vraag met het goede antwoord: de hond en de haas zijn allebei zoogdieren. Het is niet de enige vraag in IQ-tests die nu beter wordt beantwoord dan in de vorige eeuw. Uitkomsten van intelligentietests vertonen een opvallende trend: ze worden elk jaar beter. De stijging van de scores gaat zelfs zo hard dat de puntentelling regelmatig naar beneden moet worden bijgesteld – het gemiddelde moet namelijk 100 punten blijven.
[...]
Het zijn echter vooral de rechts-conservatieve krachten die steen en been klagen over diploma-inflatie e.d. Door de huidige mentaliteit raakt Nederland (juist) achterop.
Deuger & Gutmensch
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
Deuger & Gutmensch
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
wtf waarom lees ik toch de hele tijd deze complottheorie van nazi's als mainstream de laatste tijd 
boe fucking hoe
https://www.theguardian.c(...)e-to-play-the-victim
blanke mensen die hun privileges niet kennen
boe fucking hoe
https://www.theguardian.c(...)e-to-play-the-victim
blanke mensen die hun privileges niet kennen
"Geen kut is ooit nat geworden van een autist die 100 cijfers achter de komma van Pi uit zijn kop kan drummen."
corehype in KLB / Wiskundige bewijzen
corehype in KLB / Wiskundige bewijzen
Cultureel Marxisme komt uit de toverhoed van de "Frankfurt Schule" en is ontworpen om zodanig de grondvesten onder een samenleving vandaag te zagen om het tot doel uitgekozen land / staat in een communisme te veranderen.quote:
[..]
Niet mijn OP en ook niet mijn standpunt. Waar de oorspronkelijke TS op doelt is eerder de sociaal-democratie. Het cultureel Marxisme is veel destructiever en radicaler. Traditioneel Links heeft haar pijlen nooit op het gezin gericht of op vileine manier op het Christendom.
D66 komt nog het dichtst bij de 'idealen' van het CM.
Link naar deel 1: POL / Het cultureel marxisme...#1
Je bron is zeker Anders Breivik?quote:
[..]
Cultureel Marxisme komt uit de toverhoed van de "Frankfurt Schule" en is ontworpen om zodanig de grondvesten onder een samenleving vandaag te zagen om het tot doel uitgekozen land / staat in een communisme te veranderen.
Alle mensen zijn voortdurend ontevreden.
Nee hoor. Het is gewoon een kwestie van een beetje opletten wat er gebeurt in de wereld en even opzoeken waar de verrotting van de maatschappij vandaan komt:quote:
The Birth Of Cultural Marxism: How The "Frankfurt School" Changed America
by Tyler Durden
Aug 12, 2016 8:00 PM
The 1950s were a simple, romantic, and golden time in America.
California beaches, suburbia, and style. Atlas Shrugged was published, NASA was formed, and Elvis rocked the nation. Every year from 1950–1959 saw over 4 million babies born. The nation stood atop the world in every field.
It was an era of great economic prosperity in The Land of the Free.
So, what happened to the American traits of confidence, pride, and accountability?
The roots of Western cultural decay are very deep, having first sprouted a century ago. It began with a loose clan of ideologues inside Europe’s communist movement. Today, it is known as the Frankfurt School, and its ideals have perverted American society.
When Outcomes Fail, Just Change the Theory
Before WWI, Marxist theory held that if war broke out in Europe, the working classes would rise up against the bourgeoisie and create a communist revolution.
Well, as is the case with much of Marxist theory, things didn’t go too well. When war broke out in 1914, instead of starting a revolution, the proletariat put on their uniforms and went off to war.
After the war ended, Marxist theorists were left to ask, “What went wrong?”
Two very prominent Marxists thinkers of the day were Antonio Gramsci and Georg Lukács. Each man, on his own, concluded that the working class of Europe had been blinded by the success of Western democracy and capitalism. They reasoned that until both had been destroyed, a communist revolution was not possible. Gramsci and Lukács were both active in the Communist party, but their lives took very different paths. Gramsci was jailed by Mussolini in Italy where he died in 1937 due to poor health. In 1918, Lukács became minister of culture in Bolshevik Hungary. During this time, Lukács realized that if the family unit and sexual morals were eroded, society could be broken down. Lukács implemented a policy he titled “cultural terrorism,” which focused on these two objectives. A major part of the policy was to target children’s minds through lectures that encouraged them to deride and reject Christian ethics. In these lectures, graphic sexual matter was presented to children, and they were taught about loose sexual conduct.
Here again, a Marxist theory had failed to take hold in the real world. The people were outraged at Lukács’ program, and he fled Hungary when Romania invaded in 1919.
The Birth of Cultural Marxism
All was quiet on the Marxist front until 1923 when the cultural terrorist turned up for a “Marxist study week” in Frankfurt, Germany. There, Lukács met a young, wealthy Marxist named Felix Weil. Until Lukács showed up, classical Marxist theory was based solely on the economic changes needed to overthrow class conflict. Weil was enthused by Lukács’ cultural angle on Marxism.
Weil’s interest led him to fund a new Marxist think tank—the Institute for Social Research. It would later come to be known as simply The Frankfurt School.
In 1930, the school changed course under new director Max Horkheimer. The team began mixing the ideas of Sigmund Freud with those of Marx, and cultural Marxism was born.
In classical Marxism, the workers of the world were oppressed by the ruling classes. The new theory was that everyone in society was psychologically oppressed by the institutions of Western culture. The school concluded that this new focus would need new vanguards to spur the change. The workers were not able to rise up on their own.
As fate would have it, the National Socialists came to power in Germany in 1933. It was a bad time and place to be a Jewish Marxist, as most of the school’s faculty was. So, the school moved to New York City, the bastion of Western culture at the time.
Coming to America
In 1934, the school was reborn at Columbia University. Its members began to exert their ideas on American culture.
It was at Columbia University that the school honed the tool it would use to destroy Western culture: the printed word.
The school published a lot of popular material. The first of these was Critical Theory.
Critical Theory is a play on semantics. The theory was simple: criticize every pillar of Western culture—family, democracy, common law, freedom of speech, and others. The hope was that these pillars would crumble under the pressure.
Next was a book Theodor Adorno co-authored, The Authoritarian Personality. It redefined traditional American views on gender roles and sexual mores as “prejudice.” Adorno compared them to the traditions that led to the rise of fascism in Europe.
Is it just a coincidence that the go-to slur for the politically correct today is “fascist”?
The school pushed its shift away from economics and toward Freud by publishing works on psychological repression.
Their works split society into two main groups: the oppressors and the victims. They argued that history and reality were shaped by those groups who controlled traditional institutions. At the time, that was code for males of European descent.
From there, they argued that the social roles of men and women were due to gender differences defined by the “oppressors.” In other words, gender did not exist in reality but was merely a “social construct.”
A Coalition of Victims
Adorno and Horkheimer returned to Germany when WWII ended. Herbert Marcuse, another member of the school, stayed in America. In 1955, he published Eros and Civilization.
In the book, Marcuse argued that Western culture was inherently repressive because it gave up happiness for social progress.
The book called for “polymorphous perversity,” a concept crafted by Freud. It posed the idea of sexual pleasure outside the traditional norms. Eros and Civilization would become very influential in shaping the sexual revolution of the 1960s.
Marcuse would be the one to answer Horkheimer’s question from the 1930s: Who would replace the working class as the new vanguards of the Marxist revolution?
Marcuse believed that it would be a victim coalition of minorities—blacks, women, and homosexuals.
The social movements of the 1960s—black power, feminism, gay rights, sexual liberation—gave Marcuse a unique vehicle to release cultural Marxist ideas into the mainstream. Railing against all things “establishment,” The Frankfurt School’s ideals caught on like wildfire across American universities.
Marcuse then published Repressive Tolerance in 1965 as the various social movements in America were in full swing. In it, he argued that tolerance of all values and ideas meant the repression of “correct” ideas.
It was here that Marcuse coined the term “liberating tolerance.” It called for tolerance of any ideas coming from the left but intolerance of those from the right. One of the overarching themes of the Frankfurt School was total intolerance for any viewpoint but its own. That is also a basic trait of today’s political-correctness believers.
To quote Max Horkheimer, “Logic is not independent of content.”
Recalling the Words of Winston (Not That One)
The Frankfurt School’s work has had a deep impact on American culture. It has recast the homogenous America of the 1950s into today’s divided, animosity-filled nation.
In turn, this has contributed to the undeniable breakdown of the family unit, as well as identity politics, radical feminism, and racial polarization in America.
It’s hard to decide if today’s culture is more like Orwell’s 1984 or Huxley’s Brave New World.
Never one to buck a populist trend, the political establishment in America has fully embraced the ideas of the Frankfurt School and has pushed them on American society through public miseducation.
Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, the beacons of progressivism, are both disciples of Saul Alinsky, a devoted cultural Marxist.
And so we now live in a hyper-sensitive society in which social memes and feelings have overtaken biological and objective reality as the main determinants of right and wrong.
Political correctness is a war on logic and reason.
To quote Winston, the protagonist in Orwell’s dystopia, “Freedom is the freedom to say that 2+2=4.”
Today, America is not free.
http://www.zerohedge.com/(...)hool-changed-america
Breivik gaf ook de schuld aan de Frankfurter Schule, enkele jaren vóór dat artikel. En tja, als je een probleem hebt met gelijke rechten en kansen voor zwarten en vrouwen snap ik dat je over verrotting spreekt.quote:
[..]
Nee hoor. Het is gewoon een kwestie van een beetje opletten wat er gebeurt in de wereld en even opzoeken waar de verrotting van de maatschappij vandaan komt:
Alle mensen zijn voortdurend ontevreden.
Nou ja, de Frankfurt Schule heeft dus echt bestaan, is nou gevestigd in de VS en vloeien weldegelijk problemen uit voort. Moet zeggen dat ik het dus totaal niet eens ben met Breiviks gestoorde handelen. De 'linkse' mensen hebben namelijk geen idee dat ze gehersenspoeld worden met dit verderfelijk materiaal. Maar om daarmee direct de dermate negatieve uitwassen die deze 'school' op de samenleving heeft onder de mat te vegen vind ik niet helemaal rechtmatig:quote:
[..]
Breivik gaf ook de schuld aan de Frankfurter Schule, enkele jaren vóór dat artikel. En tja, als je een probleem hebt met gelijke rechten en kansen voor zwarten en vrouwen snap ik dat je over verrotting spreekt.
CULTURAL MARXISM
The gradual process of destroying all traditions, languages, religions, individuality, government, family, law and order in order to re-assemble society in the future as a communist utopia. This utopia will have no notion of gender, traditions, morality, god or even family or the state. The Philosophy was proven not to Work already by Vladimir Lenin as he tried in vein to control and subjugate the people. He admitted before he died that capitalism was the only true system in which people understand how to live with each other.... Lenin knew that there were a few western Idiots who kept spreading the communist ideas long after Lenin gave up.... he called these people useful idiots as they had more emotion than brains and could be used to subvert the western states for a military takeover in the future as the citizens would already be perverted and sick and weak from poisonous ideas, decadent lusts and mindless entertainment.
Cultural marxism: "everything is relative man".... "there is no truth".... "reality is what we make of it".... smoke dope and drop out dude!!! .... we don't need money... cops are violent pigs (especially the white ones). Women are smarter and betteer than men, all men are rapists. "get in touch with your feelings".... "if it feels good then do it"... "she so empowered!!... you go girl!!"... "there is no god"... "Let's burn the bible" "don't criticize islam!!"... "you're a bigot" "a homophobe" "you're an agist classist pig"..... "think globally act locally".... "save the whales.. the trees... the poor african kids!!".... "drop out of school and rebell against your parents".... "Dad's are scum.... mum's are cool".... "go vegetarian" "the ufo's are comming!!" .... "don't teach kids math's and reading!!!!!..... you elitist pig!!!.... they need to learn to build a veggie patch and learn to recycle and wear gender nuetral clothes!!!" "we can all eat other's cuisines and enjoy each others religions from every nation in one smelting pot of peoples and get along together and intermarry"
http://nl.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cultural%20marxism
