The Cabal; the Weaponization of Government - deel III

quote:

A cabal is a group of people united in some close design together, usually to promote their private views or interests in an ideology, state, or other community, often by intrigue, usually unbeknown to persons outside their group...

The Obama Administration's 'Brazen Plot To Exonerate Hillary Clinton' Starting To Seep Out

quote:

For the Real Collusion Story, Look at Hillary Clinton

The mainstream media has spent two years relentlessly pushing the narrative that Donald Trump’s campaign colluded with shady Russians to dig up dirt on Hillary Clinton and then cheated with the Russian government to steal the election from her.

That’s not what happened.

What actually happened was that the Clinton campaign paid a political opposition research firm, Fusion GPS, to frame Trump and his campaign by creating fake evidence of Russian collusion. To do this, Fusion GPS hired several people, including former MI6 agent Christopher Steele, to compile a dossier full of questionable second- and third-hand stories told by anonymous Russian sources about Trump and some of his campaign personnel.

Then that fake dossier was laundered to make it look like it came from intelligence agencies, not from political operatives paid by Clinton and the Democratic National Committee (DNC). The dossier was then used by the FBI to obtain a surveillance warrant on the entire Trump campaign team through a minor team member named Carter Page.

To get their FISA warrant on Page, top Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) officials deliberately misled the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) judge by hiding the fact that Steele was paid by the Clinton campaign and DNC.

Payments to Fusion GPS were hidden by passing them through the law firm Perkins Coie. Not only is that an FEC violation, it’s an attempt to get Clinton’s and the DNC’s fingerprints off the dossier.



That’s important to note because it’s going to be explored thoroughly in DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s upcoming report. Both the money used to pay for the dossier and the truth of who really created it were deliberately laundered to hide its true origins from the FISA Court.

That’s a major crime, and Horowitz will thoroughly lay out how it happened.

It’s been public information since last October that Clinton’s campaign and the DNC paid for the production of Steele’s dossier. Everything that’s come out in the intervening 10 months has only confirmed what we already know.

So evidence continues to mount that the Trump–Russian collusion narrative is actually a hoax—a massive political dirty trick that was hatched by the Clinton campaign, paid for with DNC cash, and laundered through Perkins Coie, all to create a fake dossier that was used to justify an FBI investigation as well as to spawn a strategic leaking campaign to the media.

However, many journalists have a vested interest in pretending the Steele dossier is authentic. They engage in fantasies that it hasn’t been debunked.

Mainstream media has been playing favorites between two competing narratives.

The first narrative is that the Steele dossier is real; Trump colluded/cheated with the Russians and that’s why he won the election; and Mueller is going to prove it. This is the only narrative the mainstream media wants to cover. They give the vast majority of their air and print time to discussing it.

The other narrative is one that mainstream media journalists resent every second they have to spend covering it. They want to suppress it and pretend that only right-wing conspiracy theorists discuss it.

This is, of course, the narrative where all the evidence keeps surfacing—that the real collusion during the 2016 presidential election was between the Clinton campaign, top officials in the DOJ, and the FBI, the intelligence community, and key members of the mainstream media. And this collusion involved framing the Trump campaign for stealing the election with the help of the Russian government.

And now even more evidence has surfaced that top DOJ and FBI officials were colluding with Democratic operatives to influence the 2016 election.

quote:

Op vrijdag 17 augustus 2018 00:11 schreef zomerindebol het volgende:

JW: NEW Classified Clinton Emails Uncovered from Unsecure Server--DOJ MUST Reopen Investigation

quote:

What Was Bruce Ohr Doing?
Justice releases some damning documents, but much of the truth is still classified.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation and Justice Department have continued to insist they did nothing wrong in their Trump-Russia investigation. This week should finally bring an end to that claim, given the clear evidence of malfeasance via the use of Bruce Ohr.

Mr. Ohr was until last year associate deputy attorney general. He began feeding information to the FBI from dossier author Christopher Steele in late 2016—after the FBI had terminated Mr. Steele as a confidential informant for violating the bureau’s rules. He also collected dirt from Glenn Simpson, cofounder of Fusion GPS, the opposition-research firm that worked for Hillary Clinton’s campaign and employed Mr. Steele. Altogether, the FBI pumped Mr. Ohr for information at least a dozen times, debriefs that remain in classified 302 forms.

All the while, Mr. Ohr failed to disclose on financial forms that his wife, Nellie, worked alongside Mr. Steele in 2016, getting paid by Mr. Simpson for anti-Trump research. The Justice Department has now turned over Ohr documents to Congress that show how deeply tied up he was with the Clinton crew—with dozens of emails, calls, meetings and notes that describe his interactions and what he collected.

Mr. Ohr’s conduct is itself deeply troubling. He was acting as a witness (via FBI interviews) in a case being overseen by a Justice Department in which he held a very senior position. He appears to have concealed this role from at least some superiors, since Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein testified that he’d been unaware of Mr. Ohr’s intermediary status.

Lawyers meanwhile note that it is a crime for a federal official to participate in any government matter in which he has a financial interest. Fusion’s bank records presumably show Nellie Ohr, and by extension her husband, benefiting from the Trump opposition research that Mr. Ohr continued to pass to the FBI. The Justice Department declined to comment.

But for all Mr. Ohr’s misdeeds, the worse misconduct is by the FBI and Justice Department. It’s bad enough that the bureau relied on a dossier crafted by a man in the employ of the rival presidential campaign. Bad enough that it never informed the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of that dossier’s provenance. And bad enough that the FBI didn’t fire Mr. Steele as a confidential human source in September 2016 when it should have been obvious he was leaking FBI details to the press to harm Donald Trump’s electoral chances. It terminated him only when it was absolutely forced to, after Mr. Steele gave an on-the-record interview on Oct. 31, 2016.

But now we discover the FBI continued to go to this discredited informant in its investigation after the firing—by funneling his information via a Justice Department cutout. The FBI has an entire manual governing the use of confidential sources, with elaborate rules on validations, standards and documentation. Mr. Steele failed these standards. The FBI then evaded its own program to get at his info anyway.

And it did so even though we have evidence that lead FBI investigators may have suspected Mr. Ohr was a problem. An Oct. 7, 2016, text message from now-fired FBI agent Peter Strzok to his colleague Lisa Page reads: “Jesus. More BO leaks in the NYT,” which could be a reference to Mr. Ohr.

The FBI may also have been obtaining, via Mr. Ohr, information that came from a man the FBI had never even vetted as a source—Mr. Simpson. Mr. Steele had at least worked with the FBI before; Mr. Simpson was a paid political operative. And the Ohr notes raise further doubts about Mr. Simpson’s forthrightness. In House testimony in November 2017, Mr. Simpson said only that he reached out to Mr. Ohr after the election, and at Mr. Steele’s suggestion. But Mr. Ohr’s inbox shows an email from Mr. Simpson dated Aug. 22, 2016 that reads, in full: “Can u ring.”

The Justice Department hasn’t tried to justify any of this; in fact, last year it quietly demoted Mr. Ohr. In what smells of a further admission of impropriety, it didn’t initially turn over the Ohr documents; Congress had to fight to get them.

But it raises at least two further crucial questions. First, who authorized or knew about this improper procedure? Mr. Strzok seems to be in the thick of it, having admitted to Congress interactions with Mr. Ohr at the end of 2016. While Mr. Rosenstein disclaims knowledge, Mr. Ohr’s direct supervisor at the time was the previous deputy attorney general, Sally Yates. Who else in former FBI Director Jim Comey’s inner circle and at the Obama Justice Department nodded at the FBI’s back-door interaction with a sacked source and a Clinton operative?

Second, did the FBI continue to submit Steele- or Simpson-sourced information to the FISA court? Having informed the court in later applications that it had fired Mr. Steele, the FBI would have had no business continuing to use any Steele information laundered through an intermediary.

We could have these answers pronto; they rest in part in those Ohr 302 forms. And so once again: a call for President Trump to declassify.

quote:

Op vrijdag 17 augustus 2018 10:21 schreef ems. het volgende:
Graag anti-Hillary propaganda in een eigen topic bespreken.

quote:

Op zaterdag 18 augustus 2018 10:22 schreef KoosVogels het volgende:

[..]

Uit je eigen stuk:

[..]

Je bent een smerig mannetje. Een vies leugenaartje.

quote:

Op zaterdag 18 augustus 2018 11:28 schreef KoosVogels het volgende:

[..]

Nee, jij overschrijdt een lijn door de media zonder bewijs te beschuldigen van kwade opzet. Je claimt nota bene dat ze de juryleden willen intimideren.

Terwijl het in de VS normaal is om de identiteit van juryleden openbaar te maken.

Denk verder dat juryleden meer hebben te vrezen van het Trump-kamp.

quote:

Op zaterdag 18 augustus 2018 11:40 schreef KoosVogels het volgende:

[..]

Waar jij vervolgens van maakt dat de media de juryleden willen intimideren. Hoe zie jij dat precies voor je? Op de redactie van de NYT wordt overlegd hoe ze de juryleden kapot kunnen maken om zo een veroordeling zeker te stellen? Wat voor mensen denk jij dat er bij de media werken?

quote:

Op zaterdag 18 augustus 2018 11:39 schreef dellipder het volgende:
Rehash:

The Papadopoulos Case Needs a Closer Look

Niet in de laatste plaats vanwege banden van Joseph Mifsud met westerse inlichtingendiensten en dat het wel erg goed uitkwam dat hij onvindbaar is.

quote:

Op zaterdag 18 augustus 2018 11:54 schreef KoosVogels het volgende:

[..]

En uit het feit dat Ellis wordt beveiligd concludeer jij dat de media de juryleden willen intimideren?

Wat? Waar slaat dat Op?

quote:

Op zaterdag 18 augustus 2018 12:05 schreef KoosVogels het volgende:

[..]

Naar ik begrijp onthulde Ellis pas dat hij is bedreigd met de dood nadat het verzoek was ingediend. Hij gaf dat ook als reden om de namen niet naar buiten te brengen.

quote:

Op zaterdag 18 augustus 2018 12:35 schreef KoosVogels het volgende:

[..]

Ongefundeerde verdachtmakingen. Er is helemaal geen sprake van jury tampering. In de VS is het niet ongebruikelijk dat de namen van juryleden openbaar worden gemaakt. Nadat diverse media een verzoek hebben ingediend, reageert Ellis met de mededeling dat hij bedreigd wordt en dat hij het verzoek niet wordt ingewilligd. Daarmee is het nu klaar.

quote:

Op zaterdag 18 augustus 2018 12:04 schreef dellipder het volgende:
Het argument "dat wordt wel vaker gedaan" geeft ook geen specifieke reden aan waarom er een media coalitie in het leven moet worden geroepen om juist tijdens de beraadslaging de namen en adressen openbaar te willen zien -nadat er om uitleg is gevraag over de definitie "reasonable doubt".

quote:

Op zaterdag 18 augustus 2018 12:41 schreef KoosVogels het volgende:

[..]

Media trekken wel vaker samen op. Zie ook de Panama Papers. Niets geks aan dus.

quote:

Op zaterdag 18 augustus 2018 12:43 schreef KoosVogels het volgende:

[..]

Dat is blijkbaar relevante informatie in de VS. De namen van alle juryleden die betrokken waren bij de OJ-case zijn bijvoorbeeld ook openbaar. Zo werkt dat daar.

quote:

Op zaterdag 18 augustus 2018 12:48 schreef KoosVogels het volgende:

[..]

Werkelijk alle media melden dat Ellis wordt bedreigd en dat hij namen van de niet openbaar maakt. Ook op de NOS. Alleen laten die jouw verdachtmakingen logischerwijs achterwege.

quote:

In the age of online mobs and media-doxxing, media request during deliberations to unseal names could be viewed as an attempt at intimidation.

quote:

In a case such as this, that could be seen as an act of media intimidation -- the jury is not sequestered so they certainly would hear about it. In an environment of online mobs and CNN having threatened to doxx a gif maker who mocked CNN, the jurors rightly would be concerned if the judge released their personal information to the media.

The media could have waited until after the verdict, but that would not have allowed the media to camp outside jurors homes in time for the immediate news cycle. Jurors also could have been given the choice, after the verdict, whether to have their names revealed.

That's not to say these same media outlets won't take it on themselves to out the jurors, particularly if there is a not guilty verdict, but the judge wasn't going to make it easy for them.

quote:

CNN Accused of Intimidating Paul Manafort Jury

As Bre Payton at the Federalist points out, “Publicly outing the names and home addresses of jurors is considered ethically questionable, as outlined in this guidance sheet on the topic from the Reporter’s Committee for Freedom of the Press.”

To begin with, it is seen as unseemly to thrust jurors into the spotlight against their will when they are not volunteering for publicity; they are chosen.

What many see here, and not without precedent, is yet another attempt by the media, most especially CNN, to bully and intimidate private, everyday citizens into convicting Manafort.

quote:

Op zaterdag 18 augustus 2018 11:49 schreef dellipder het volgende:

[..]

Robert Mueller's straf-aanbeveling voor George Papadopoulos is hoogstwaarschijnlijk 30 dagen opsluiting.

[ afbeelding ]

bron

quote:

Did the FBI Use Formal Interviews With Ohr to Transmit Information From Steele?

Information contained in FD-302s could be the key to understanding how Steele’s information was transmitted to the FBI

The fourth highest-ranking official at the Department of Justice (DOJ), Bruce Ohr, actively shared information he received from former MI6 spy Christopher Steele with the FBI, after the agency had terminated Steele as a source.

Interactions between Ohr and Steele stretched months into the first year of Trump’s presidency and were documented in a number of FD-302s, which summarize interviews with him by the FBI.

The existence of the FD-302s detailing Ohr’s interactions with Steele calls into question who at the FBI—and possibly the DOJ—was aware of his activities.

As Associate Deputy Attorney General, Ohr reported directly to Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates.

Ohr first came to the public’s attention on Dec. 7, 2017, when Fox News revealed that Ohr had been in repeated contact with Steele during the 2016 presidential campaign—while Steele was in the ongoing process of constructing his dossier containing unverified claims about Trump.

Fox News also disclosed that Ohr met with Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson after the election. Fusion GPS had been hired by the Clinton presidential campaign and Democratic National Committee (DNC) to produce the dossier on Trump, for which the company had hired Steele.

It was later revealed that Ohr met with Simpson prior to the presidential election as well.

On Dec. 11, 2017, it was revealed that Ohr’s wife, Nellie Ohr, had worked for Fusion GPS during the 2016 election. Nellie Ohr was “paid by Fusion GPS through the summer and fall of 2016.”

Bruce Ohr never publicly disclosed the employment of his wife by Fusion GPS despite a requirement to file financial disclosure forms regarding his wife’s work.

Ohr was demoted following the initial Fox News report, losing his title of Associate Deputy Attorney General and his prestigious office on the fourth floor of the Justice Building. It appears the DOJ only took action after they learned of the Fox News investigation into Ohr’s role.

Newly released texts, emails, and handwritten notes have provided further insight into Ohr’s interactions with Steele and Simpson.

It appears that Ohr became the conduit between Steele, Fusion GPS, and the FBI after Steele was formally terminated by the FBI in late October or early November 2016. Steele’s termination occurred after he revealed—in violation of FBI policy—his relationship with the FBI in an Oct. 30, 2016, Mother Jones article by David Corn.

Interactions between Ohr and Steele are highlighted in a Feb. 28, 2018, letter from Senator Chuck Grassley to DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz, which makes reference to documents the DOJ provided to Grassley.

“These documents have raised several serious questions about the propriety of the FBI’s relationship with former British Intelligence agent Christopher Steele,” the letter reads.

“The documents also raise questions about the role of Bruce Ohr, a senior Justice Department official whose wife worked for Fusion GPS, in continuing to pass allegations from Steele and Fusion GPS to the FBI after the FBI had terminated Mr. Steele as a source.”

Of importance is the specific wording by Senator Grassley. Ohr was “continuing to pass allegations from Steele and Fusion GPS to the FBI after the FBI had terminated Mr. Steele as a source.”

Senator Grassley then provided specific evidence detailing his claims: “Numerous FD-302s demonstrating that Department of Justice official Bruce Ohr continued to pass along allegations from Mr. Steele to the FBI after the FBI suspended its formal relationship with Mr. Steele for unauthorized contact with the media, and demonstrating that Mr. Ohr otherwise funneled allegations from Fusion GPS and Mr. Steele to the FBI.”

FD-302s are used to report or summarize FBI interviews.

Grassley wasn’t insinuating that Ohr might have served as the conduit between Steele and the FBI. He was stating these occurrences as fact. Grassley had seen the underlying 302s and listed them in his letter to Inspector General Horowitz along with actual FBI interview dates:

• Ohr FD-302 12/19/16 (interview date 11/22/16)
• Ohr FD-302 12/19/16 (interview date 12/5/16)
• Ohr FD-302 12/19/16 (interview date 12/12/16)
• Ohr FD-302 12/27/16 (interview date 12/20/16)
• Ohr FD-302 1/27/17 (interview date 1/27/17)
• Ohr FD-302 1/31/17 (interview date 1/23/17)
• Ohr FD-302 1/27/17 (interview date 1/25/17)
• Ohr FD-302 2/8/17 (interview date 2/6/ 17)
• Ohr FD-302 2/15/17 (interview date 2/14/17)
• Ohr FD-302 5/10/17 (interview date 5/8/17)
• Ohr FD-302 5/12/17 (interview date 5/ 12/17)
• Ohr FD-302 5/16/17 (interview date 5/15/17)

Contact between Steele and Ohr continued through to at least mid-May 2017—six months after the election.

We know that Steele and Fusion GPS continued their work following the 2016 election.

Sometime in early 2017, Steele and Fusion GPS were hired by a former intelligence committee staffer for Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), Daniel Jones, who runs the Penn Quarter Group. The stated purpose behind hiring Steele and Fusion was to “continue exposing Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.”

Ohr’s role in this process is currently being investigated by Congress.

Ohr has been scheduled for an Aug. 28 interview before the House Committees on the Judiciary and Oversight and Government Reform. In advance of this interview, Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) and Oversight and Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) are requesting additional information regarding Ohr in the form of any and all FD-302s—including any generated from previously undisclosed FBI interviews of Ohr:

“In anticipation of this interview, we request DOJ provide the Committee access to all FD-302’s written as a result of any interviews conducted by the FBI of Mr. Ohr. These should include, but not be limited to, any 302’s previously made available to other congressional committees,” the letter reads.

The existence of additional FD-302s could reveal that contact between Ohr, Steele, and Simpson was more prevalent than previously thought.

The fact that Ohr was able to continue his communications with Steele and funnel information into the FBI through interviews formalized in FD-302s raises the question of who in the chain of command was aware of the interactions.

Information provided by Steele, which the FBI itself said it was unable to verify, played a crucial role in the FBI obtaining a FISA warrant on Trump campaign volunteer Carter Page. Information provided by Ohr could have made its way into subsequent FISA renewals.

Then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates signed the original FISA Warrant on Carter Page in October 2016 along with the first FISA Renewal in January 2017. Ohr reported directly to Yates.

Yates was present at a Jan. 5, 2017, meeting with then-President Barack Obama, then-FBI Director James Comey, then-Vice President Joe Biden, and then-National Security Advisor Susan Rice in the oval office of the White House. That meeting was documented in an email sent by Susan Rice to herself and was disclosed in a letter from Senator Grassley.

According to Grassley, that meeting reportedly included a discussion of the Steele dossier and the FBI’s investigation of its claims.

The FD-302s detailing the FBI interviews of Ohr could shed more light on the role that senior Obama officials played in the set-up of the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign based on Steele’s information.

quote:

Why isn't the MSM clamoring for declassification of the memo? Maybe because some of them have already seen it, and it's bad.

James A. Wolfe, the Senate staffer who is accused of leaking documents, sent 82 text messages to his girlfriend Ali Watkins, the New York Times reporter, the evening after the Senate Intelligence Committee saw it. The FISA warrant is 82 pages, not including the signature page. Why would he send pages that were 100% redacted? Answer: He wouldn't. It was an unredacted version.

So the New York Times has seen the real FISA warrant, and possibly others have by now as well. And they are no longer crying for it to be declassified in order to show all the evidence the FBI had against Carter Page and the Trump Campaign! I wonder why not?

Because it's bad...real, real bad. But not for Trump, rather for the DOJ, FBI, and possibly the Obama Administration.

quote:

‘Major Crack in Government’s Defenses’: We May Finally Learn How the FBI Handled the Steele Dossier

U.S. District Judge Amit P. Mehta has ruled that the FBI cannot issue a Glomar response when it comes to whatever verification attempts they may have used for the contents of the infamous Christopher Steele dossier. In other words, the FBI can no longer hide behind the “we can neither confirm nor deny” response in order to stonewall records requests regarding how they may have tried to determine the validity of the synopsis of the dossier that raised concerns President Donald Trump might be compromised by Russia, pee tapes and all.

“In this case, the court must decide whether the February 2018 public release of two congressionally drafted memoranda—popularly known as the ‘Nunes Memo’ and the ‘Schiff Memo’—vitiates Defendants’ Glomar responses to Plaintiffs’ demand for records concerning a ‘two-page synopsis’ of the Dossier,” the judge began, noting that he had previously sided with the government.

Judge Mehta said that the disclosures in the Nunes and Schiff memos “constitute a public acknowledgement of the existence of the records sought by Plaintiffs from Defendant Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) and that the FBI therefore may no longer maintain its Glomar responses.”

National security lawyer Bradley P. Moss, whose tweet on the news you can see above, told Law&Crime that this is a “major crack in the Government’s legal defenses.”

“[Those defenses were] designed to conceal whether the FBI has taken any steps to verify the accuracy of the ‘salacious’ allegations outlined in that synopsis provided to then-President-elect Trump in January 2017,” Moss said. “Ironically, if it turns out that the FBI has undertaken such efforts and has verified any of the claims, thereby embarrassing President Trump politically, the president will have no one to blame for that revelation other than himself.”

Moss said what made this “largely possible” was Trump’s decision to declassify the Devin Nunes and Adam Schiff memos. Moss works with the Law Office of Mark S. Zaid, Esq. and represents the James Madison Project, the named plaintiff in the judge’s response which you can read here.

quote:

Op zondag 19 augustus 2018 21:37 schreef ems. het volgende:

[..]

Klagen over censuur maar afwijkende meningen snel censureren

quote:

As Expected, Lawyer/Lobbyist Adam Waldman Refuses to Cooperate With Senate Judiciary Committee

Adam Waldman is the lawyer/lobbyist for Oleg Deripaska, the Russian billionaire who appears to be a key background player in the 2016 DOJ/FBI scheme against presidential candidate Donald Trump. Additionally, Waldman represents the U.S. interests of Christopher Steele, author of the Clinton-Steele Dossier that was used by the DOJ/FBI during their scheme against presidential candidate Donald Trump.

Waldman was also the person in contact with corrupt Senate Intelligence Committee vice-chairman Mark Warner early in 2017 when the ‘insurance policy’ was deployed against newly elected President Donald Trump. As discovered in text messages, Waldman was the liaison, the person providing plausible deniability, between Senator Warner, Christopher Steele and Oleg Deripaska.



As many people are now aware, the SSCI is the most corrupt committee apparatus within congress; and as noted in the text messages, Adam Waldman only wanted to work with the Senate Intelligence Committee on his endeavors.

However, Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley has requested testimony from Mr. Waldman surrounding his contacts and engagements throughout the 2016/2017 operation to undermine and remove President Donald Trump. In a response letter released today (full pdf here) lawyers representing Mr. Waldman are trying to keep their client from forced testimony; and it appears likely he is remaining outside of the country to avoid being captured in the investigative net.

Here’s the letter from Waldman’s lawyers:

quote:

Op donderdag 23 augustus 2018 02:16 schreef zomerindebol het volgende:
https://www.thegatewaypun(...)-word-versus-trumps/

quote:

Op donderdag 23 augustus 2018 07:52 schreef KoosVogels het volgende:

[..]

Maar wanneer worden Obama, Clinton en McCain nou precies opgepakt? Of is dit allemaal onderdeel van het masterplan van Trump?

quote:

Op donderdag 23 augustus 2018 08:21 schreef KoosVogels het volgende:

[..]

Geen idee, vraag het hen. Ik heb nooit beweerd dat Trump wordt afgezet.

Wat betreft de collusion: we gaan het zien. Ik wacht rustig de uitkomsten af van het Mueller-onderzoek.

quote:

Op donderdag 23 augustus 2018 08:32 schreef KoosVogels het volgende:

[..]

Oh, dat de benoeming doorgaat, daar twijfelt niemand aan. En deze kwestie gaat Trump niet de kop kosten. Dan zouden de Republikeinen hem moeten afvallen en dat gaat niet gebeuren.

Wel bijzonder dat je de gebeurtenissen van de afgelopen dagen beschouwt als een of ander strategie van 'het verzet'. Dat Cohen zo ging draaien, had niemand aan zien komen. Vooral Trump niet.

quote:

Op donderdag 23 augustus 2018 08:34 schreef KoosVogels het volgende:

[..]

De ironie van deze post zal jou vast ontgaan.

Nogmaals, ik wacht geduldig de uitkomsten van het onderzoek af. Het zijn boeiende tijden voor politieke junkies. Ik vermaak mij dan ook kostelijk.

quote:

Op donderdag 23 augustus 2018 08:35 schreef ems. het volgende:
"Geest aan het najagen" en vervolgens zelf 3 topics volspammen met propaganda omdat mensen kwaad spreken over die pion van een Trump

quote:

Op donderdag 23 augustus 2018 08:39 schreef KoosVogels het volgende:

Een aantal Democraten dringt inderdaad aan op uitstel. Maar ik heb nog geen commentatoren serieus de verwachting uit zien of horen spraken dat dat ook gebeurt.

quote:

Oké. En nu?

quote:

Op donderdag 23 augustus 2018 08:40 schreef KoosVogels het volgende:

[..]

De ironie sloeg vooral op jouw 'wens is de vader van de gedachte'-opmerking.

Verder merk ik op dat je steeds geïrriteerder begint te raken. Geen leuke week gehad?

quote:

Op donderdag 23 augustus 2018 08:53 schreef ems. het volgende:

[..]

Nah. Ik vind het vooral belangrijk voor de medelezers om te zien dat je hypocriet en geëmotioneerd bent omdtrent Trump en dat men dus je propaganda met een flinke korrel zout moet nemen.

Verder ben je de hele tijd aan het slachtofferen wat ronduit lachwekkend is. Zeker als je anderen beticht van iets waar je je zelf al weken aan schuldig maakt

quote:

Op donderdag 23 augustus 2018 08:54 schreef zomerindebol het volgende:

[..]

stap voor stap zoals eerder vermeld, eerst zullen o.a. Bruce Ohr, (die volgens schipp een behoorlijke email conference had met steele om samen het dossier bij elkaar te fantaseren) wat een klap zal dat geven in de libtards hoofdjes, en brennan en consorten die de clearance afgepakt zullen worden krijgen een endictment aan hun broek.

Clinton e.d. zie ik pas gebeuren na de midterms of mischien zelfs net voor de volgende verkiezingen al blijft dat koffiedik kijken, want als de onderzoeken van huber eerder klaar zijn of de andere lopende zaken kan het een en ander wel eens versnellen.

Ik weet dat ik iig aan de goede kant sta van dit gebeuren en dat ik niet me in bochten ga hoeven wringen om maar weer uit te leggen waarom er nog steeds geen bewijs is van collusion terwijl de andere kant daar heel duidelijk is.

quote:

Many Clinton supporters believe Comey’s 11th hour reopening of a case that had shadowed her campaign was a form of sabotage that cost her the election. But the evidence shows Comey and his inner circle acted only after worried agents and prosecutors in New York forced their hand. At the prodding of Attorney General Lynch, they then worked to reduce and rush through, rather than carefully examine, potentially damaging new evidence.

quote:

Op vrijdag 24 augustus 2018 10:38 schreef KoosVogels het volgende:

Wel grappig dat je al weet ik hoeveel pagina's volplempt met vermeende corruptieschandalen, gepleegd door overheden en/of functionarissen. Maar ondertussen zijn is het de kring rondom Trump die daadwerkelijk in de beklaagdenbank zit.

quote:

Op maandag 4 juni 2018 22:14 schreef dellipder het volgende:
Het aantal mensen van de DoJ en de FBI dat ontslag heeft geregen, zijn opgestapt of een demotie hebben gehad;

DoJ

John Carlin, opgestapt (heeft een rol in het Fisa-abuse)
Sally Yates, ontslagen (medeplichtig aan het framen van Micheal Flynn)
Bruce Ohr, twee demoties gekregen (had zeer nauwe connecties met Christopher Steele, Glenn Simpson en Fusion GPS ook via zijn vrouw Nellie Ohr die voor Fusion GPS werkte)
David Laufman, opgestapt (nauw verbonden met de Clinton e-mail controverse)
Rachel Brand, opgestapt (Fisa 702)
Mary McCord, opgestapt (medeplichtig aan "unmasking" en 'leaking" in de zaak Flynn)

FBI

James Comey, ontslagen (exonaration before investigation; voerde een nep-onderzoek uit in de Clinton e-mail controverse}
Peter Strzok, demotie gehad en verwijderd van de special counsel-team ontslagen (medeplichtig aan het framen van Micheal Flynn en het vrijpleiten van Hillary Clinton)
Lisa Page, demotie gehad en opgestapt ("uitvoerende kracht van de "insurance policy")
Andrew McCabe, ontslagen (betrokken bij het vrijpleiten van Hillary Clinton en het framen van Donald Trump en Micheal Flynn)
Bill Priestap, in zijn positie gebleven, maar bevoegdheden beperkt
Micheal Kortan, ontslag genomen (P.R-man van de FBI, moglijk betrokken bij media lekken en/of mediaspins)
James Rybicky, ontslagen (een belangrijke spil in de "insurance policy"-complot)
James Baker, demotie gehad en beperkte bevoegdheden gekregen (uitvoerende kracht van de 'insurance policy")

quote:

Op vrijdag 24 augustus 2018 08:35 schreef dellipder het volgende:
Nog meer corruptie:

Despite Comey Assurances, Vast Bulk of Weiner Laptop Emails Were Never Examined

Het artikel zou men natuurlijk in zijn geheel moeten lezen, maar ik highlight even de bekende : talking point" van de Dems, #Theresistance, antialles uit het artikel:

[..]

Over de achtergrond hiervan heb ik eerder een bericht gemaakt die je hier kan lezen.

Report: Bulk of Weiner laptop emails were never examined

quote:

Op zaterdag 25 augustus 2018 13:54 schreef KoosVogels het volgende:

[..]

Het IG-rapport maakt duidelijk dat er van bias geen sprake was, enkel dat er werd geblunderd. Over Strzok wordt veel tamtam gemaakt, maar uiteindelijk gaat de zaak als een nachtkaars uit. Die sms'jes waren niet handig, maar dat was het dan ook wel.

Geen idee hoe het zit met Comey en die brief (kon ook zo snel geen betrouwbare bron vinden waarin het waarom erachter is onderzocht). Feit is echter dat ook hernieuwde onderzoeken naar het handelen van Clinton niets hebben geleverd. Tevens is het een feit dat het optreden van Comey juist nadelig heeft uitgepakt voor Clinton.

quote:

Op zaterdag 25 augustus 2018 14:13 schreef KoosVogels het volgende:

[..]

Strzok is ontslagen, dat klopt. Zijn positie was ook redelijk onhoudbaar geworden na alle ophef. En nu? Want zijn verklaringen hebben Mueller niet afgeremd noch het onderzoek schade toegebracht.

quote:

Verder vind ik prima als Clinton wordt vervolgd als ze strafbare feiten heeft gepleegd. Tot dusver is dat nog niet aangetoond, ondanks dat daar genoeg tijd en energie in is gestoken.

quote:

En zelfs als de onderzoeken van Comey 'nep' waren, het resultaat blijft hetzelfde: zijn handelen was in het nadeel van Clinton en heeft haar misschien zelfs het presidentschap gekost.

quote:

18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information

(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

quote:

Op zaterdag 25 augustus 2018 14:44 schreef KoosVogels het volgende:

Wat betreft dat laatste artikel: je weet dat het rapport onderstaande stelt?

quote:

Wat betreft dat het een feit zou zijn dat Clinton schuldig zou zijn aan het plegen van strafbare feiten: prima, toon dat aan en vervolg haar. Dat zou onder de huidige omstandigheden een koud kunstje moeten zijn, zeker gezien jouw stelligheid.

quote:

Op zaterdag 25 augustus 2018 15:02 schreef KoosVogels het volgende:

Jij maakt een heel punt van Comey die op eigen houtje zou handelen. Dat heeft hij inderdaad gedaan, maar dat heeft vooral nadelig uitgepakt voor Clinton.

quote:

Jij bent degene die conclusies trekt. Volgens jou is Clinton immers schuldig aan van alles.

quote:

Special access program

Special Access Programs (SAPs) in the U.S. Federal Government are security protocols that provide highly classified information with safeguards and access restrictions that exceed those for regular (collateral) classified information. SAPs can range from black projects to routine but especially-sensitive operations, such as COMSEC maintenance or Presidential transportation support. In addition to collateral controls, a SAP may impose more stringent investigative or adjudicative requirements, specialized nondisclosure agreements, special terminology or markings, exclusion from standard contract investigations (carve-outs), and centralized billet systems.[1] Within the Department of Defense, SAP is better known as "SAR" by the mandatory Special Access Required (SAR) markings.

Judge Napolitano: New Revelations Make Hillary 'Prime Candidate for Prosecution'

Inspector General Reveals Hillary Clinton Had HIGHEST Secret Classified Material on Email Server!

quote:

Op donderdag 23 augustus 2018 08:04 schreef dellipder het volgende:

[..]

Lanny Davis is een vertrouweling van de Clintons en een adept van Barack Obama. Zo ook Micheal Cohen. Cohen werkte voor Hillary Clinton voordat hij voor Donald Trump ging werken.
Lanny David is onder FARA geregistreerd voor Dmytro Firtash, gelinkt aan Vladimir Putin, die gezocht wordt door de Amerikaanse overheid.

Lanny Davis Obliterated CNN’s ‘Bombshell’ Report About Michael Cohen And Trump Tower

• CNN reported on July 27 that Michael Cohen is willing to tell investigators that Donald Trump authorized the infamous Trump Tower meeting with a group of Russians
• But Cohen’s lawyer now says that bombshell report got “mixed up”
• Lanny Davis says that Cohen “does not” have information that Trump had prior knowledge about the meeting

(Desbetreffende CNN-segment embedded in het artikel)

quote:

Exclusive: Michael Cohen told Congress he doesn’t know if Trump knew about Russia meeting


Michael Cohen told lawmakers last year, in sworn testimony, that he didn't know whether then-candidate Donald Trump had foreknowledge of the 2016 Trump Tower meeting with Russians, three sources with knowledge of Cohen's testimony tell Axios.

The big picture: And Cohen still doesn't know whether Trump knew about the infamous meeting, according to Cohen's lawyer, Lanny Davis. "Nothing has changed," he told Axios. News reports last month said Cohen was willing to assert to special counsel Robert Mueller that Trump did know about the meeting in advance.

• Why it matters: Questions about Cohen's testimony about the meeting may earn him a return trip to Capitol Hill.

What's new: This information about what Cohen told Congress about Trump — reported here for the first time — colors in the gaps of a joint statement Tuesday by Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr and Vice Chair Sen. Mark Warner that got buried under the Cohen-Manafort news avalanche.

• "[W]e recently re-engaged with Mr. Cohen and his team following press reports that suggested he had advance knowledge of the June 2016 meeting between campaign officials and Russian lawyers at Trump Tower," the statement says.
• "Mr. Cohen had testified before the Committee that he was not aware of the meeting prior to its disclosure in the press last summer."
• "[T]he Committee inquired of Mr. Cohen's legal team as to whether Mr. Cohen stood by his testimony. They responded that he did stand by his testimony."
• "We hope ... Mr. Cohen’s plea agreement will not preclude his appearance before our Committee as needed for our ongoing investigation.”

The backstory: Last year, when questioned under oath by lawmakers on the House intelligence committee, Cohen not only said that he himself had no foreknowledge of the meeting but that he had no idea whether Trump did either, according to three sources with knowledge of his testimony.

• A source briefed on Cohen's testimony said he repeated that testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee.

I asked Davis why he didn't shoot down last month's stories.

• Davis, after a long day of TV hits defending Cohen, said: "It was painful. We were not the source, we could not confirm, and we could not correct. We had to be silent because of the sensitivity needed in the middle of a criminal investigation."

quote:

Op zaterdag 25 augustus 2018 15:11 schreef dellipder het volgende:

Hillary Clinton heeft misdrijven gepleegd door TS/SCI informatie en SAP-inlichtingen van een beveiligde overheidslocatie te halen en op naar servertje in het keldertje te sturen.
James Comey heeft een nep-onderzoek gedaan om dit alles in de doofpot te laten verdwijnen. Het was bijna gelukt met het wisselen van gross negligence en extreme carelessness
Ware het niet voor pervert Anthony Wiener en de honderduizenden e-mails die op zijn laptop zijn gevonden.
Andrew McCabe heeft hierover zijn baas niet ingelicht en zodra er werd gedreigd de media over de ontdekking in te lichten moest Comey wel actie ondernemen.
Pervert Wiener...

quote:

Op woensdag 29 augustus 2018 11:19 schreef KoosVogels het volgende:

[..]

Waar blijven die arrestaties die jij ons had beloofd?

quote:

Op donderdag 23 augustus 2018 08:21 schreef KoosVogels het volgende:

Geen idee[...]

Wat betreft de collusion: we gaan het zien. Ik wacht rustig de uitkomsten af van het Mueller-onderzoek.

quote:

Op woensdag 29 augustus 2018 15:30 schreef zomerindebol het volgende:

[..]

Je ziet toch wat zich aan het ontvouwen is met o.a. Ohr , als dalijk de andere onderzoeken zijn geweest komen de arrestaties vanzelf.
Je kan hier wel over door blijven ouwehoeren maar liever dat je ontopic blijft ipv een topic probeert te saboteren.

Of denk je dat men het niet aan gaat pakken dat o.a. clinton geheimen heeft verkocht aan china door ze toegang te geven op de server.

quote:

WASHINGTON, D.C. –Congressman Louie Gohmert (TX-01) released the following statement today regarding the claim made by the FBI that they have ‘not found any evidence’ regarding Hillary Clinton’s serving being breached:

“It’s not surprising that the FBI ‘has not found any evidence’ regarding Clinton’s servers being breached. Like I stated to Former FBI Agent Peter Strzok in the House Judiciary Hearing, it was the Obama-appointed Intelligence Community Inspector General that discovered the breach. It was not the FBI that found it, so their statement was technically correct, but very deceptive in its omission.

When I asked Peter Strzok about this, he said that he remembered being briefed by the ICIG investigator but did not remember what it was about. That is not credible. We know that the FBI’s head of counter-intelligence, Mr. Strzok, was doing all he could to help protect Hillary Clinton. So, when the Intel IG investigator came to report to Mr. Strzok that a specific foreign intelligence entity (which was not Russian) was receiving virtually all the emails from Secretary of State Clinton’s private server in real time, it is not remotely believable that he would not remember the conversation. In fact, if he testified that he remembered the briefing, he would be potentially incriminating himself in a coverup or obstruction role.

One thing has been made acutely clear – partisan politics, sadly, are very much at play within some of the leadership at the FBI. Though Strzok and other FBI personnel were briefed on Hillary Clinton's server being hacked, as now reported, they knew this would devastate Hillary Clinton’s chances of being elected and they were not about to let that happen.

Fortunately, progress is currently being made at the FBI and there are good people there who are making a difference. Unfortunately, the FBI’s deceptive omission in its statement reveals that the FBI has not been completely cleansed of the partisanship that so pervasively corrupted it in Washington, DC.”

quote:

Op woensdag 5 september 2018 15:15 schreef Vis1980 het volgende:

[..]

Hoe lang duurde het onderzoek Watergade?

quote:

Op woensdag 5 september 2018 17:18 schreef Vis1980 het volgende:
Haha ik stelde een hele normale, duidelijke en beantwoordbare vraag. Jullie komen met een tegenvraag.

Probeer het nog eens, dan beantwoord ik je vraag.

quote:

Op woensdag 5 september 2018 17:52 schreef Vis1980 het volgende:

[..]

Aangeven dat een onderzoek lang kan duren en bij afronding pas een uitslag gaat komen. Knap dat jullie al weten dat er niets is gevonden.

quote:

Op woensdag 5 september 2018 16:15 schreef dellipder het volgende:

[...] wat precies is probable cause geweest om aan te nemen dat er een misdrijf is gepleegd?

quote:

Op woensdag 5 september 2018 19:59 schreef Chewie het volgende:

[..]

Waarom eis je die directheid niet van jezelf eigenlijk?

Je pedante toontje en je weigering om een discussie te voeren maakt dit topic al dood en als een antwoord je niet zint betekend dit nog niet dat er geen antwoord gegeven is, maar ja wat kan je ook verwachten van mensen die Trump als grote voorvechter van de vrijheid zien.

Vraag me daadwerkelijk af of je de serieus te nemen bronnen waarvan jij denkt dat ze je (Qanon) geneuzel ondersteunen wel gelezen hebt en zo ja of je ze wel begrijpt aangezien die bronnen je verhaal namelijk nooit ondersteunen. Bronnen die je geneuzel wel ondersteunen zijn alt-rechtse blogjes en de moonies krant

quote:

Op woensdag 5 september 2018 19:37 schreef Vis1980 het volgende:
De eerste zin na heel simpel;

Daar staat je antwoord al lang.

quote:

Op woensdag 5 september 2018 20:31 schreef Chewie het volgende:

[..]

Ja die zijn je al vaak genoeg gegeven door anderen en mij, dat jij er voor kiest om die te negeren is toch echt jouw probleem.

Maar blijf vooral doorgaan met je onnozele complotje, tot nu toe gaat het exact het omgekeerde wat jij (of de alt rechtse twitter mongool die je volgt maar slecht vertaald) hier aan het beweren bent.

quote:

Op woensdag 5 september 2018 20:40 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:

[..]

Wat denk je zelf dan wat dat is?

quote:

Op woensdag 5 september 2018 21:01 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:

[..]

Dat lijkt me overduidelijk, het hulp krijgen van een buitenlandse mogendheid.

quote:

Op woensdag 5 september 2018 21:19 schreef Vis1980 het volgende:

[..]

Er loopt een onafgemaakt onderzoek, nogal wiedes dat jij geen bewijs hebt gezien.

quote:

Op woensdag 5 september 2018 21:22 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:

Wacht het resultaat van dat onderzoek nou gewoon af...

quote:

Op woensdag 5 september 2018 21:35 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:

[..]

Right... onderzoek doen is natuurlijk nergens voor nodig. Laten we onze conclusies gewoon nu al klaar hebben!

quote:

Op woensdag 5 september 2018 21:49 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:

Wat bazel je nou weer? Beetje jammer dat je het nodig vindt om van alles te gaan verzinnen. Het slaat namelijk nergens op.