[AMV] President TRUMP: Koning, Keizer, Admiraal #256

quote:

Op vrijdag 10 februari 2017 02:18 schreef KrappeAuto het volgende:

[..]

Nou, ja, ik ga Wilders stemmen in maart dus wat dat betreft heb ik een minuscule rol in het bepalen wat ons beleid moet zijn op dit thema, maar voor de rest heb ik het niet voor het zeggen, nee. Had je inhoudelijk nog iets toe te voegen?

quote:

Op vrijdag 10 februari 2017 02:50 schreef wdn het volgende:

[..]

Moet je zelf weten waar je op stemt natuurlijk.
Maar zou elke stem op 1 van de kleinere partijen niet hetzelfde resultaat hebben?
Heeft waarschijnlijk meer effect.

Een PVV met 50+ zetels zou ook niet goed zijn voor Nederland verwacht ik.
En zo'n kleinere partij zou wel eens in ruil voor het doorvoeren van een standpunt van die partij mee kunnen doen aan een regering (want de kans dat we 6 partijen nodig gaan hebben voor een meerderheid is reeel)

quote:

Zemel v. Rusk, 381 U.S. 17 (1965) (“[S]imply because a statute deals with foreign relations [does not mean that] it can grant the Executive totally unrestricted freedom of choice.”).

quote:

Op vrijdag 10 februari 2017 01:23 schreef Puddington het volgende:
Voor de critici die zeggen dat dit in het supreme Court teruggedraaid gaat worden omdat dat bij het 9th district vaak gebeurt omdat ze zogenaamd liberaal zijn, dit stukje:

[..]

https://www.reddit.com/r/(...)njunction_on/ddjwi26

quote:

I'm not trying to get into a fight here, but the court ruled under authority granted via Runyon v. McCrary, which is a pretty thin premise and construct. Step away from the politics for a second - if this were flipped by a higher court, would you really be surprised?

I think the ban is dumb too, but this really does smell like judicial insertion. And in my view, /u/victor_e_bull take on it is far more accurate. You've read rulings like these before - when a court spends 11 of 29pgs on jurisdiction, review ability, and standing. Its precisely because they know an appeals court is unlikely to find in its favor - the court is writing to the appeals court. Less is always more in these cases.

quote:

SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!

quote:

Op donderdag 9 februari 2017 20:34 schreef WhiteBeard het volgende:

[..]

En zelfs binnen de EU zijn er voorwaarden voor immigratie.

quote:

Op vrijdag 10 februari 2017 05:30 schreef L3gend het volgende:
Wel opvallend dat tweemaal een Bush rechter zich tegen de EO heeft gekeerd

quote:

Op vrijdag 10 februari 2017 05:35 schreef DUTCHKO het volgende:

[..]

Waarom?
Rechters moeten onpartijdig kunnen oordelen.

quote:

Op vrijdag 10 februari 2017 05:38 schreef L3gend het volgende:

[..]

Dat zijn ze in het algemeen ook, maar hiermee kan de smoes dat het links liberale rechters zich tegen Trump keren teniet worden gedaan.

De EO van Trump is gewoon puinhoop

quote:

Op vrijdag 10 februari 2017 05:38 schreef L3gend het volgende:

[..]

Dat zijn ze in het algemeen ook, maar hiermee kan de smoes dat het links liberale rechters zich tegen Trump keren teniet worden gedaan.

De EO van Trump is gewoon puinhoop

quote:

Op vrijdag 10 februari 2017 05:42 schreef Eyjafjallajoekull het volgende:
Dat zijn ze in het algemeen ook, maar hiermee kan de smoes dat het links liberale rechters zich tegen Trump keren teniet worden gedaan.

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op zaterdag 04-02-2017 om 21:44:07 What is our country coming to when a judge can halt a Homeland Security travel ban and anyone, even with bad intentions, can come into U.S.? reageer retweet

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op zaterdag 04-02-2017 om 14:12:02 The opinion of this so-called judge, which essentially takes law-enforcement away from our country, is ridiculous and will be overturned! reageer retweet

twitter:

Bart_DeWever twitterde op donderdag 08-12-2016 om 17:46:15 #iksteunTheo reageer retweet

twitter:

Bart_DeWever twitterde op vrijdag 09-12-2016 om 11:38:34 Geen ‘gouvernement des juges’ https://t.co/S0kAjhjacp https://t.co/RNDVAtbmh3 reageer retweet

twitter:

Bart_DeWever twitterde op vrijdag 30-12-2016 om 11:13:16 Wereldvreemde en activistische rechtspraak mocht ik dus niet zeggen wegens ongehoord ... hoe mag ik dit arrest van de RVV dan wel noemen? 🤔 reageer retweet

twitter:

Bart_DeWever twitterde op vrijdag 03-02-2017 om 16:20:26 Nee, de critici hadden gelijk: dit mag je niet wereldvreemd noemen. Het is pure waanzin. (Bron @HLN_BE… https://t.co/OShcn0grfP reageer retweet

quote:

Op vrijdag 10 februari 2017 05:35 schreef DUTCHKO het volgende:
Waarom?
Rechters moeten onpartijdig kunnen oordelen.

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op donderdag 09-02-2017 om 14:26:07 Sen. McCain should not be talking about the success or failure of a mission to the media. Only emboldens the enemy! He's been losing so.... reageer retweet

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op donderdag 09-02-2017 om 14:31:59 ...long he doesn't know how to win anymore, just look at the mess our country is in - bogged down in conflict all over the place. Our hero.. reageer retweet

quote:

Op vrijdag 10 februari 2017 07:48 schreef 99.999 het volgende:
Whehe, wat zou het hier saai zijn geweest als Clinton gewoon president was geworden.

quote:

Op vrijdag 10 februari 2017 07:56 schreef DUTCHKO het volgende:

[..]

Misschien saai in politiek opzicht maar minder saai in militaire conflikten...

quote:

Just four weeks after Donald Trump stood beside a table stacked high with papers trumpeting his plan to separate himself from his business empire, the president and his family and advisers have not made much effort to truly split their business activities and their official duties.

His Palm Beach club Mar-a-Lago doubled its initiation fee, while Sean Spicer, his press secretary, has labeled it "the Winter White House." The CEO of his hotels business pondered a threefold expansion. Foreign dignitaries are flocking to his Washington hotel. He urged British officials to scuttle a wind farm that would obstruct the view from his golf course. Lawyers for first lady Melania Trump claimed in a New York State libel suit that a Daily Mail article about her cost her the chance “to launch a broad-based commercial brand in multiple product categories, each of which could have garnered multimillion-dollar business relationships."

Then, on Thursday, senior adviser Kellyanne Conway, standing in front of the White House seal for a Fox News interview, told people to buy from first daughter Ivanka Trump’s fashion line after Nordstrom yanked the products from their stores.

Ethics lawyers called it a clear violation of the executive branch’s regulation against officials’ endorsing companies and products.

"You can't do that," said Richard Painter, a chief ethics official in the Bush White House. "You just can't do that." Even Rep. Jason Chaffetz, a Republican and head of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said it was "wrong, wrong, wrong,” "unacceptable," and "clearly over the line."

But there’s little official recourse since the White House essentially self-polices on such ethics issues. And Conway is unlikely to face reprimand from a boss who clearly approves. It was Trump himself, after all, who touched off the controversy, when he took to Twitter on Wednesday to attack Nordstrom, saying his daughter had been “treated so unfairly” by the company and that its decision was “terrible!"

"What the president did, that was even worse," Painter said. "You can't send a tweet from your official account criticizing a company. It is just another ethical problem with his presidency

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op vrijdag 10-02-2017 om 00:35:49 SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE! reageer retweet

quote:

White House press secretary Sean Spicer tangled with the press corps during the daily briefing on Thursday, as reporters repeatedly pressed him to explain how Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch’s criticism of Donald Trump got twisted, among other controversies.

Spicer appeared to reach his boiling point when, after a six-minute stretch of inquiries related to Gorsuch, he batted down a question about why Trump has time to tweet about a department store but neglected to tweet about a recent attack on a mosque in Quebec.
.
“Why are you asking why he didn’t do it when I literally stood here and did it?” an exasperated Spicer told SiriusXM's Jared Rizzi, explaining that after the attack he addressed the nation himself from his White House lectern for the president. “What are you… a tw…? You’re equating me addressing the nation here in a tweet? That’s the silliest thing I’ve ever heard. OK, I’m done. This is silly. OK, next.”

Spicer entered the briefing room Thursday afternoon facing no shortage of negative headlines: Kellyanne Conway’s potential ethics violation over promoting Ivanka Trump’s brand on Fox News, a Reuters report detailing President Donald Trump’s private call with Russian President Vladimir Putin in which he slammed a nuclear treaty after first asking his aides what the treaty was, and questions about Gorsuch appearing to denounce Trump’s attacks on the judiciary.