NWS Nieuws & Achtergronden
Discussieer hier diepgaander over de actualiteiten.
https://www.eurointegrati(...)/2024/05/21/7186378/
Dat was inderdaad een blamage. Dat niet alleen de EU (als eerste zelf) maar zelfs de NAVO zijn condolences uitsprak na de dood van de Iraanse president. quote:Will the world mourn when Putin dies? How the death of Iran's president has embarrassed the West
The crash that killed Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi and several other senior officials on Sunday has caused many Ukrainians to question whether Western politicians have a proper grasp of reality, given that Iran openly supports Putin's Russia and supplies it with weapons for the war against Ukraine.
When Tehran officially confirmed the deaths of Iran’s president and foreign minister, top European politicians rushed to offer the Iranians their condolences, even expressing "solidarity" with them.
Statements from politicians about their support for Iran just kept on coming, despite being met with outrage from ordinary citizens and politicians. Particularly surprising were the inappropriate (from our perspective) remarks by politicians whose pro-Ukrainian stance is unquestionable. Even the US, despite its image as a public enemy of Iran, made gestures of respect for the politician rightly dubbed "the Butcher of Tehran".
After this, it won’t be a surprise to hear expressions of sympathy and "liking" from Western politicians when Putin dies. Certain EU leaders have had some time to think about this already.
SPOILEROm spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.Solidarity with the "Butcher of Tehran"
Perhaps the first high-ranking Western official to have made a controversial statement was Janez Lenarčič, the EU commissioner responsible for crisis management and humanitarian aid. He made the statement on Sunday, before official confirmation of the Iranian officials' deaths had come through. Lenarčič reported that Tehran, unable to locate the crash site, had turned to Brussels for help.
"Upon Iranian request for assistance we are activating the EU's Copernicus EMS rapid response mapping service [a service for quickly providing satellite images – EP] in view of the helicopter accident reportedly carrying the President of Iran and its foreign minister," he tweeted, adding the hashtag #EUSolidarity.
The hashtag immediately sparked unanimous outrage overnight in response to the commissioner's tweet.
"Solidarity with a terrorist regime? Does the EU know this?" "Why? They are openly intent on destroying the EU." "Are you serious? It's absolutely horrifying that the EU is declaring solidarity with the Butcher of Tehran." "Solidarity with the regime that funds EU-recognised terror groups, kills girls who dare to have their hair uncovered, and arms Russia in Ukraine? Shameful."
These are just some of the comments, with many tens of thousands of likes, that appeared under Lenarčič's tweet in the first few hours from verified users – European experts, journalists and others.
Many called for Janez Lenarčič's resignation. Influential national politicians such as Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, who chairs the Bundestag Defence Committee, also expressed outrage over the tweet. The commissioner had to publicly justify himself the next morning, claiming he had been misunderstood and had meant "an act of humanity" rather than solidarity.
This blunder should have demonstrated the need to think through any statements on Iran very carefully, considering the country’s overall role and the passengers of the helicopter that crashed. However, as soon as Tehran had confirmed the death of Iran’s president and foreign minister, European politicians were unstoppable.
A flood of statements of "support" for the Iranian government began to pour out.
One of the first to react in Brussels was European Council President Charles Michel, who expressed "sincere condolences" on behalf of the entire EU.
The reaction to Michel's tweet indicated how out of kilter his statement was with the views of ordinary Europeans. Only a thousand people liked his tweet, whereas critical comments received tens or even hundreds of times more support.
"The EU? Not in my name!" exclaimed German regional MP Gert Wllmann, tweeting a collage of over a hundred faces of Iranians killed by Raisi's regime. His comment garnered thousands of likes. The phrase "not in my name" featured in many of the more than 10,000 comments on Michel's post of condolence "on behalf of the EU".
"Oh boy, European condolences for the death of a butcher and cruel mass murderer. You don’t speak in my name," Theo Francken, a Belgian MP, said.
Unlike Lenarčič, Charles Michel did not retract or apologise for his words.
It turned out he was the first, but far from the most cringeworthy.
Josep Borrell, the head of EU diplomacy, offered condolences to the people of Iran, and this mantra about the "people" was echoed by other Western leaders.
This was in sharp contrast with the fact that until last week, European politicians never missed a chance to remind everyone that the current Iranian government (represented by Raisi and Amir-Abdollahian) oppresses its people, conducts repressions and punishes democratic expression. The plane crash left no room for this in their statements.
Astonishingly, even NATO expressed its condolences to the "people of Iran" on the death of the Iranian leaders! The appearance of this statement was extremely odd: the alliance was certainly not forced to do this; Iran is more of a problem and potential threat for NATO, and certainly not a partner; ultimately, this statement was made despite the fact that clearly not all NATO members agreed with it.
But the most bizarre statement came from Polish President Andrzej Duda, who compared Raisi's death to the death of Lech Kaczyński. The fact that the former was an ally of Putin, while the latter was Duda’s political opponent who was killed in 2010 as his plane attempted to land at a Russian air base, did not stop Duda from tweeting this nonsense, angering many ordinary Poles.
Has everyone in the West lost their minds?
The statements by Duda, Michel and Borrell clearly illustrated that even Ukraine's friends – and those who certainly do not have warm feelings towards Russia and its allies in this war – joined in the general chorus of "thoughts and prayers", sometimes playing a significant role in the surge of such statements.
And while condolences were natural coming from the Global South, and even more so from Iran's neighbours (ranging from Azerbaijan, which unintentionally played a role in the events leading up to the crash, to Trkiye, which even declared mourning in solidarity), the mass outpouring of statements from Western leaders was frankly striking, surprising and sometimes shocking.
It reached the point of absurdity.
How else can one describe the Pope's declaration of the "spiritual closeness to the Iranian people" he claimed to feel after the crash?
However, amid the amnesia that has gripped many European leaders, a few examples stand out. More precisely, there is currently only one state that has publicly declared that the death of Iran’s president is not a cause for mourning: Lithuania.
Lithuanian Foreign Minister Gabrielius Landsbergis said: "I don't feel comfortable sending condolences while Iran is sending drones that are used against civilians in Ukraine." Several other states have not publicly stated what their Lithuanian counterpart said, but they hold roughly the same view as Landsbergis, says a source in the diplomatic corps.
As far as other countries are concerned, the only politicians who have expressed this obvious and logical stance are outside the government – such as the MPs mentioned above. A prime example of the sane mind is this comment by former US vice president Mike Pence.
--"Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi is dead and the world is a safer place. Raisi was responsible for the murder of thousands of Iranian political prisoners he ordered executed in 1988, 1,500 Iranians slaughtered in the 2019 protests and the years of terrorist violence sown by Iran across the region that claimed American lives. My hope and prayer is that Raisi’s death will give the people of Iran a chance to claim their birthright of freedom and end Iran’s long reign of terror," Pence said.--
This is a thoroughly hawkish statement in the classic Republican spirit. It's just a shame that hardly anyone thinks like this anymore.
The US stance deserves a mention of its own. The US officially classifies Iran as part of the "axis of evil", and for a long time it refrained from making any statements or gestures regarding the disaster – until it was put to the vote at a UN Security Council meeting, and the all-or-nothing mentality disappeared.
At the Security Council meeting on 20 May, the representative of Mozambique, which holds the Security Council presidency in May, also offered condolences to the Iranians and announced that there would be a "minute of silence". All the UN Security Council members except the US diplomats immediately stood up, while the Americans pointedly remained seated. A few seconds later, though, having sent their signal of dissatisfaction, they too stood up to pay their respects to Raisi.
What happens at the UN Security Council is always coordinated, and this episode was no exception. The US had therefore prepared to honour Ebrahim Raisi and consciously participated in this ceremony. This speaks louder than any statements – although Washington’s statement did sound relatively sane.
The whole story has been very revealing – for Ukraine as well, as it immerses us in the reality of international relations. Unfortunately these realities are cynical in the extreme, and there is almost no room left for values and principles. More precisely, these principles are valid for many, but they vanish as soon as a politician becomes a government official and begins to represent the state in the world.
From that moment on, politicians develop a desire for compromise and finding common ground with aggressors, ignoring even public opinion.
Isolated exceptions like Lithuania do not, unfortunately, change the overall picture. Moreover, there is nothing fundamentally new about this story. Many will remember that when Vitaly Churkin, the Russian Ambassador to the UN and one of Russia’s key international advocates, died in 2017, there was a similar outpouring of condolences, statements about the death of a distinguished diplomat, and so on...
Of course it could be argued that that was before 2022 and the world was still unaware of the nature and danger of Putin's regime. But unfortunately, given how Ukraine’s partners have acted in the case of Iran, it is clear that the problem lies elsewhere. And there is little doubt that even after Putin dies, many in the West will be eager to express their condolences, contrary to the lessons the world should have learned back in 1945.
Iran die een terroristische staat is die Rusland helpt in de oorlog met Oekrane, Hamas helpt tegen Israel, en nog andere terroristische organisaties steunt in hun gevecht met het westen.
En condolences naar de Iraanse bevolking toe? Laat mij niet lachen. Er werd vuurwerk afgestoken en gefeest door een grote groep van de bevolking. Onder zijn bewind werden de Iranirs onderdrukt, uitgemoord, gemarteld en nog veel meer van dat soort dingen.
Alleen Litouwen heeft publiekelijk aangegeven geen condolences te willen sturen. Daarvoor hulde.
Op 
Op 
Op 
Op 
Op 
Op 
Op 
Ook gestorven voor onze vrijheid. 
. Zelfde trucje dat ze bij de Kerch brug hebben uitgehaald.
