[AMV] Amerikaanse politiek #841 EverythingTrumpTouchesDies

quote:

Op woensdag 7 oktober 2020 23:12 schreef Szura het volgende:
[ twitter ]

quote:

Op woensdag 7 oktober 2020 23:18 schreef epicbeardman het volgende:

[..]

bron

quote:

Op woensdag 7 oktober 2020 23:19 schreef SnertMetChoco het volgende:
Open er een topic over op SHO.

quote:

Op woensdag 7 oktober 2020 23:21 schreef Tijger_m het volgende:

[..]

Hunter Biden is geen kandidaat noch bekleed hij enige gekozen of ongekozen functie in de VS.

quote:

Op woensdag 7 oktober 2020 23:16 schreef Zelva het volgende:

[..]

Waarom moet Morgenstern daarover worden bijgepraat en waarom is dat interessant?

quote:

Op woensdag 7 oktober 2020 21:39 schreef speknek het volgende:
[ twitter ]

Een maand geleden was dit nog een spannende race. Je gelooft het bijna niet.

De belastingaangiftes en de covid hubris zijn misschien wel historische october surprises.

quote:

Op woensdag 7 oktober 2020 23:24 schreef Tijger_m het volgende:

[..]

Dat is heel goed mogelijk maar het zou nieuws zijn als je kon aantonen dat zijn vader iets gedaan had omdat Hunter geld kreeg van iemand en dat is nu juist wat nooit gebeurt. Dus dan is het allemaal helemaal niet interessant.

quote:

Op woensdag 7 oktober 2020 23:31 schreef Tijger_m het volgende:

[..]

Ja, en daar kwam NUL beinvloeding van Biden sr of door Biden sr uit. Waarmee het dus allemaal een beetje irrelevant word.

quote:

Op woensdag 7 oktober 2020 23:25 schreef Szura het volgende:

[..]

Je leest verkeerd.

quote:

Op woensdag 7 oktober 2020 23:34 schreef Tijger_m het volgende:

[..]

Mischien moet je lezen wat ik post?

quote:

In addition to the over $4million paid by Burisma for Hunter Biden's and Archer's board memberships,Hunter Biden hisfamily and Archer received millions of dollars from foreign nationals with questionable backgrounds

quote:

Op woensdag 7 oktober 2020 23:37 schreef Zelva het volgende:

[..]

De andere optie is dat Trump zou worden bijgepraat, maar dat lijkt me zeer sterk.

quote:

Op woensdag 7 oktober 2020 23:51 schreef DonDruiper het volgende:
Dus hij zit weer in de Oval Office alsof er niks aan de hand is? Alsof hij niet nog besmettelijk is?

quote:

Op woensdag 7 oktober 2020 23:51 schreef DonDruiper het volgende:
Dus hij zit weer in de Oval Office alsof er niks aan de hand is? Alsof hij niet nog besmettelijk is?

quote:

Op donderdag 8 oktober 2020 00:13 schreef AnneX het volgende:
[ twitter ]
Dit klinkt ernstig.

quote:

Op woensdag 7 oktober 2020 23:37 schreef epicbeardman het volgende:

[..]

Dat maakt het nieuws niet minder relevant, ondanks dat er rapporten zijn dat de Biden SR's geen invloed hebben gehad. (heb mij er niet zo in verdiept) Dat zijn zoon rijk wordt in in voor veel Amerikanen een vaag land ligt gewoon niet lekker terwijl er miljoenen moeten rondkomen van welfare.
[..]

Uit de pdf.

quote:

Op woensdag 7 oktober 2020 22:02 schreef Tijger_m het volgende:
Vrienden, boeren en buitenlui, de Amerikaanse verkiezingen zijn aanstaande en dus hebben wij onze franchise even tijdelijk uitgebreid en wel hier:

Amerikaanse verkiezingen 2020

Allen zijn welkom!

quote:

Op donderdag 8 oktober 2020 00:35 schreef Tijger_m het volgende:

[..]

Ja, en bedankt

quote:

Op donderdag 8 oktober 2020 00:37 schreef Tijger_m het volgende:

[..]

quote:

Covid-19 has created a crisis throughout the world. This crisis has produced a test of leadership. With no good options to combat a novel pathogen, countries were forced to make hard choices about how to respond. Here in the United States, our leaders have failed that test. They have taken a crisis and turned it into a tragedy.

The magnitude of this failure is astonishing. According to the Johns Hopkins Center for Systems Science and Engineering, the United States leads the world in Covid-19 cases and in deaths due to the disease, far exceeding the numbers in much larger countries, such as China. The death rate in this country is more than double that of Canada, exceeds that of Japan, a country with a vulnerable and elderly population, by a factor of almost 50, and even dwarfs the rates in lower-middle-income countries, such as Vietnam, by a factor of almost 2000. Covid-19 is an overwhelming challenge, and many factors contribute to its severity. But the one we can control is how we behave. And in the United States we have consistently behaved poorly.

We know that we could have done better. China, faced with the first outbreak, chose strict quarantine and isolation after an initial delay. These measures were severe but effective, essentially eliminating transmission at the point where the outbreak began and reducing the death rate to a reported 3 per million, as compared with more than 500 per million in the United States. Countries that had far more exchange with China, such as Singapore and South Korea, began intensive testing early, along with aggressive contact tracing and appropriate isolation, and have had relatively small outbreaks. And New Zealand has used these same measures, together with its geographic advantages, to come close to eliminating the disease, something that has allowed that country to limit the time of closure and to largely reopen society to a prepandemic level. In general, not only have many democracies done better than the United States, but they have also outperformed us by orders of magnitude.

Why has the United States handled this pandemic so badly? We have failed at almost every step. We had ample warning, but when the disease first arrived, we were incapable of testing effectively and couldn’t provide even the most basic personal protective equipment to health care workers and the general public. And we continue to be way behind the curve in testing. While the absolute numbers of tests have increased substantially, the more useful metric is the number of tests performed per infected person, a rate that puts us far down the international list, below such places as Kazakhstan, Zimbabwe, and Ethiopia, countries that cannot boast the biomedical infrastructure or the manufacturing capacity that we have.2 Moreover, a lack of emphasis on developing capacity has meant that U.S. test results are often long delayed, rendering the results useless for disease control.

Although we tend to focus on technology, most of the interventions that have large effects are not complicated. The United States instituted quarantine and isolation measures late and inconsistently, often without any effort to enforce them, after the disease had spread substantially in many communities. Our rules on social distancing have in many places been lackadaisical at best, with loosening of restrictions long before adequate disease control had been achieved. And in much of the country, people simply don’t wear masks, largely because our leaders have stated outright that masks are political tools rather than effective infection control measures. The government has appropriately invested heavily in vaccine development, but its rhetoric has politicized the development process and led to growing public distrust.

The United States came into this crisis with enormous advantages. Along with tremendous manufacturing capacity, we have a biomedical research system that is the envy of the world. We have enormous expertise in public health, health policy, and basic biology and have consistently been able to turn that expertise into new therapies and preventive measures. And much of that national expertise resides in government institutions. Yet our leaders have largely chosen to ignore and even denigrate experts.

The response of our nation’s leaders has been consistently inadequate. The federal government has largely abandoned disease control to the states. Governors have varied in their responses, not so much by party as by competence. But whatever their competence, governors do not have the tools that Washington controls. Instead of using those tools, the federal government has undermined them. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which was the world’s leading disease response organization, has been eviscerated and has suffered dramatic testing and policy failures. The National Institutes of Health have played a key role in vaccine development but have been excluded from much crucial government decision making. And the Food and Drug Administration has been shamefully politicized,3 appearing to respond to pressure from the administration rather than scientific evidence. Our current leaders have undercut trust in science and in government,4 causing damage that will certainly outlast them. Instead of relying on expertise, the administration has turned to uninformed “opinion leaders” and charlatans who obscure the truth and facilitate the promulgation of outright lies.

Let’s be clear about the cost of not taking even simple measures. An outbreak that has disproportionately affected communities of color has exacerbated the tensions associated with inequality. Many of our children are missing school at critical times in their social and intellectual development. The hard work of health care professionals, who have put their lives on the line, has not been used wisely. Our current leadership takes pride in the economy, but while most of the world has opened up to some extent, the United States still suffers from disease rates that have prevented many businesses from reopening, with a resultant loss of hundreds of billions of dollars and millions of jobs. And more than 200,000 Americans have died. Some deaths from Covid-19 were unavoidable. But, although it is impossible to project the precise number of additional American lives lost because of weak and inappropriate government policies, it is at least in the tens of thousands in a pandemic that has already killed more Americans than any conflict since World War II.

Anyone else who recklessly squandered lives and money in this way would be suffering legal consequences. Our leaders have largely claimed immunity for their actions. But this election gives us the power to render judgment. Reasonable people will certainly disagree about the many political positions taken by candidates. But truth is neither liberal nor conservative. When it comes to the response to the largest public health crisis of our time, our current political leaders have demonstrated that they are dangerously incompetent. We should not abet them and enable the deaths of thousands more Americans by allowing them to keep their jobs.

quote:

Op donderdag 8 oktober 2020 01:41 schreef Jojoke het volgende:
Als ik de laatste berichten van Trump zo lees dan is er �f grote paniek in kamp Trump over de aankomende verkiezingen �f hij zit aan de pilletjes en heeft ze niet op een rijtje. Misschien beiden.

quote:

Op donderdag 8 oktober 2020 01:50 schreef Szura het volgende:
[ twitter ][ twitter ]

Nog wat corona in de brandhaard van Amerika

quote:

Op donderdag 8 oktober 2020 02:39 schreef Kijkertje het volgende:
[ twitter ]