Ik zou het echt briljant vinden dat na al die Rusland beschuldigingen een affaire met een pornoster hem fataal wordt.quote:Op donderdag 19 april 2018 08:34 schreef klappernootopreis het volgende:
https://www.politico.com/(...)el-cohen-flip-536926
De schrik zit er goed in daar..
Ik gaf al aan dat Trump op gegeven moment onderuit gehaald wordt door een kleine speler.quote:Op donderdag 19 april 2018 08:44 schreef DustPuppy het volgende:
[..]
Ik zou het echt briljant vinden dat na al die Rusland beschuldigingen een affaire met een pornoster hem fataal wordt.
quote:President Donald Trump’s trade tariffs are already claiming their first American victims. But it isn’t Chinese duties causing the damage ― at least, not yet. It’s Canadian ones.
Tariffs imposed by the U.S. Commerce Department on Canadian newsprint in January and increased in March have caused the price of the paper product to skyrocket as much as 32 percent, hitting an already cash-strapped newspaper industry. As a result, the Tampa Bay Times, which has won 12 Pulitzer Prizes, is being forced to lay off about 50 staffers, the Tampa Bay Business Journal reported Wednesday.
The paper’s CEO, Paul Tash, offered a frank assessment of the duties’ effect in a letter to readers published late last month, noting the Times uses 17,000 tons of newsprint a year. Thanks to Trump’s tariffs, the cost per ton of newsprint is now $800 instead of $600, upping the paper’s yearly bill by $3.4 million.
“Payroll is the only expense that is bigger than newsprint,” Tash wrote. “To help offset the extra expense of paper, publishers will eliminate jobs. Make no mistake: These tariffs will cause layoffs across American newspapers, including this one.”SPOILEROm spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.
Elk nadeel heb z'n voordeel, zullen ze wel denken.quote:Op donderdag 19 april 2018 10:42 schreef brokjespoes het volgende:
Jobs! Jobs! Jobs! Bel de krant! O nee, dat kan niet meer, het krantenpapier is te duur geworden...
Trump’s Tariffs Are Costing American Jobs. Again. (HuffPo)
[..]
Daar willen Republikeinen het liever even niet over hebben, kennelijk helpt het niet echt.quote:Op maandag 16 april 2018 23:59 schreef FlipjeHolland het volgende:
Je hoort trouwens ook niks meer over het repeal and replacen van Obamacare.
quote:GOP Spending Against Obamacare Plummets In 2018 Elections (HuffPo; reading time: 6:57)
Since the Affordable Care Act’s passage in 2010, repealing Obamacare has been the driving issue for the Republican Party. GOP lawmakers voted to defund, change or repeal parts of the law at least 67 times while President Barack Obama was in office, and they promised voters that if they won control of the White House, they’d make the dream of full repeal come true.
Republicans received their chance in the 2016 elections, which handed the party control of both chambers of Congress and the White House. But they failed to get the job done last year as voters realized what they’d be losing and public opinion swung in favor of the law. The GOP has shown no signs of trying to take up repeal again this year.
Now, Republicans are giving up on Obamacare repeal as a campaign issue as well. Anti-Obamacare ad spending in the 2018 election cycle has plummeted compared to the same period in the previous three cycles. “The reality of the situation is that Republicans really don’t have much to say about health care at this point,” said Geoff Garin, a Democratic pollster who is president of Hart Research.SPOILEROm spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.
quote:Three right-wing militiamen from rural Kansas were found guilty on Wednesday in a 2016 plot to slaughter Muslim refugees living in an apartment complex in Garden City.
Patrick Stein, Gavin Wright and Curtis Allen were found guilty on charges of weapons of mass destruction and conspiracy against civil rights. Wright was also found guilty on a charge of lying to the FBI. The defendants will face a potential life sentence when they come back to court in late June.
The jury decided the case after slightly less than a day of deliberations. The three defendants showed little outward emotion as the verdicts were read. Afterward, defense attorneys comforted the defendants’ family members, who did not wish to speak to members of the media.
In closing arguments, attorneys for the defendants had accused the FBI of overstepping and targeting the group because of rhetoric that, while hateful, was protected by the First Amendment.SPOILEROm spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.
Ik denk dat die gasten altijd al geradicaliseerd zijn geweest. Het verschil is dat ze nu makkelijker in het openbaar kunnen "actievoeren". Waar voorheen kleurlingen en minderheden "ongelukjes" kregen of simpelweg spoorloos verdwenen, worden die nu door dit soort Angry White Men direct bedreigd of aangevallen, omdat die zich gesteund voelen door Trump met zijn "I think there is blame on both sides" uitspraak.quote:Op donderdag 19 april 2018 11:28 schreef brokjespoes het volgende:
Vervolg op These Three "Angry White Men" Had A Plan To Kill Muslims. How Were They Radicalized?
Right-Wing Extremists Guilty In Terror Plot Against Muslim Refugees (HuffPo)
[..]
quote:A Kansas federal judge ruled Wednesday that Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach (R) was in contempt of court for failing to follow her order to register voters who had signed up to vote at the DMV but had failed to present proof of citizenship.
U.S. District Judge Julie Robinson said Kobach had failed to comply with a 2016 preliminary injunction that blocked a Kansas law requiring people to provide proof of citizenship when they register to vote. The decision affected roughly 18,000 people whose registrations were being held up, and Robinson told Kobach to make sure those voters were fully registered. Kobach assured her that he would and that he would send out postcards to any affected voter.
Kansans usually get a postcard before an election informing them of their polling place, and those who didn’t get them before an election would likely have been confused, the plaintiffs said at the trial.SPOILEROm spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.quote:"Secretary Kobach likes to talk about the rule of law. Talk is cheap, and his actions speak louder than his words."
[ Bericht 0% gewijzigd door brokjespoes op 19-04-2018 13:01:25 ]
bronquote:The General Accountability Office has already determined that Pruitt broke laws when he installed a privacy booth at exorbitant expense; the nonpartisan investigator has also been asked to look into the raises Pruitt gave to staff using an obscure legal loophole and his purges of the EPA’s advisory boards.
The House Oversight Committee asked Pruitt for a series of documents and witness interviews spanning many of his scandals.
The House Energy and Commerce Committee is now “seeking information on a flood of ethics questions and lavish spending” by Pruitt.
The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee is investigating Pruitt’s use of multiple emails, and whether he evaded FOIA requests.
The White House said it would probe Pruitt’s relationship with an energy lobbyist who gave him a special deal on his condo rent.
The Office of Management and Budget will investigate Pruitt’s wasteful spending of $43,000 on a privacy booth.
The EPA Office of the Inspector General is currently conducting investigations into Pruitt over (1) his possible violation of anti-lobbying laws (2) his spending on security (3) his expensive privacy booth, and (4A) his travel, a probe which it subsequently (4B) expanded (4C) twice.
Ik heb zo'n vermoeden dat hij een swamp voor zichzelf heeft gecreëerd..quote:Op donderdag 19 april 2018 13:49 schreef Re het volgende:
Pruitt ondertussen de meest onderzochte Administrator?
[..]
bron
Die journalisten kunnen toch in een staalfabriek gaan werken?quote:Op donderdag 19 april 2018 10:45 schreef westwoodblvd het volgende:
[..]
Elk nadeel heb z'n voordeel, zullen ze wel denken.
quote:In the case of Amazon, Trump roasted the company for days on Twitter at the end of March, crushing its stock price. Since then he’s only asked for a review of Post Office contracts, including the one it has with Amazon. Investors consider the review unlikely to amount to anything. Fears of a full-bore assault on the online retail giant have evaporated and its shares are climbing again.
One of the wealthiest hedge fund managers in the world, who is a Trump supporter and did not want to be identified by name criticizing the president, said trading on any single Trump comment — whether Amazon or anything else — was ill advised given how quickly he can change positions or simply move on to another subject
(....)
Taro Aso, Japan’s finance minister, told reporters that he “would welcome” the United States' return (to TPP), “if it’s true.” But he added that Trump “is a person who could change temperamentally, so he may say something different the next day," Aso said, according to a Reuters report.
In Australia, Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull echoed the sentiment and said it would be "great" to have Washington rejoin the pact. But, he added, “we’re certainly not counting on it."
Is dat een andere aanklacht als deze: https://saraacarter.com/b(...)j-on-steele-dossier/ ?quote:Op donderdag 19 april 2018 14:46 schreef westwoodblvd het volgende:
Cohen dropt zijn smaad & laster aanklachten tegen BuzzFeed en het bureau achter het Steele Dossier:
Cohen drops libel suits against BuzzFeed, Fusion GPS
https://www.politico.com/(...)usion-lawsuit-537327
"Dropping the suits could help Cohen avoid being questioned by lawyers from Fusion GPS or having to turn over evidence related to the case — both steps that could undercut his defense in the criminal probe."
Ra ra ra waarom zou hij er geen heil meer in zien?
Dat is geen aanklacht, maar zijn wat geradicaliseerde republikeinen in het Huis van Afgevaardigden die wat lopen te roepen naar de department of justice voor hun radicale achterban.quote:Op donderdag 19 april 2018 19:52 schreef fliert het volgende:
[..]
Is dat een andere aanklacht als deze: https://saraacarter.com/b(...)j-on-steele-dossier/ ?
Ik zie soms door al die bomen het bos niet meer.
Gebaseerd op bizarre hoeveelheid tijd die ze bezig zijn geweest met Clinton in het verleden zonder ook maar ergens te komen denk ik dat het verstandig is om dat hierbij als standaard uitgangspunt te nemen.quote:
quote:Inspector general referred findings on McCabe to U.S. attorney for consideration of criminal charges (WaPo)
The Justice Department inspector general referred its finding that former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe repeatedly misled investigators who were examining a media disclosure to the top federal prosecutor in D.C. to determine whether McCabe should be charged with a crime, according to people familiar with the matter.
The referral to the D.C. U.S. Attorney’s Office occurred some time ago, after the inspector general concluded McCabe had lied to investigators or his own boss, then-FBI Director James B. Comey, on four occasions, three of them under oath.
It was not immediately clear how the D.C. U.S. Attorney’s Office responded to the referral, or whether prosecutors there are conducting their own investigation or believe criminal charges are appropriate. A referral to federal prosecutors does not necessarily mean McCabe will be charged with a crime.
The Justice Department, the D.C. U.S. Attorney’s Office and a spokeswoman for McCabe declined to comment Thursday.
Last week, Inspector General Michael Horowitz sent to Congress a report blasting McCabe. It says he inappropriately authorized the disclosure of sensitive information to the media, then lied repeatedly to investigators examining the matter. The report — which quickly became public, though it was not released by the inspector general — laid out in stunning detail allegations McCabe had deceived investigators about his role in approving the disclosure, even as he lashed out at others in the FBI for leaks.
McCabe, though, disputes many of the report’s findings and has said he never meant to mislead anyone.
Lying to federal investigators is a crime punishable by up to five years in prison, and some legal analysts speculated in the wake of the report that the inspector general seemed to be laying out a case for accusing McCabe of such conduct. The report alleged that one of McCabe’s lies “was done knowingly and intentionally” — which is a key aspect of the federal crime.SPOILEROm spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.
quote:Trump today, via pool: “Human trafficking is worse than it’s ever been in the history of the world.”
Wat?quote:Op donderdag 19 april 2018 21:53 schreef ExtraWaskracht het volgende:
Imgur zou het weer moeten doen ... testje:
[ afbeelding ]
Trump heeft gelijk. Het is een witch hunt.twitter:business twitterde op donderdag 19-04-2018 om 21:36:18Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein told Trump last week that he isn’t a target of any part of Mueller’s investigation, sources say https://t.co/FIZcWqzs57 https://t.co/ivpq0sgoxS reageer retweet
twitter:SethAbramson twitterde op donderdag 19-04-2018 om 22:35:36This is excellent news. It gives Rosenstein some job security (possibly short-lived) even as it means *absolutely nothing* for the certainty that Donald Trump will eventually face impeachable offenses. https://t.co/Owxmfzzi9t reageer retweet
twitter:SethAbramson twitterde op donderdag 19-04-2018 om 22:37:272/ Essentially, this news story—and all its many predecessors in the same vein—is based on a popular misconception of what the word "target" means and when it is used. But hey, if it convinces Trump and gets him off the FBI's back, his imbecilic credulousness is a national asset. reageer retweet
twitter:SethAbramson twitterde op donderdag 19-04-2018 om 22:39:263/ Meanwhile, Trump telling his top advisers that it's simply "not the right time" to fire Mueller and/or Rosenstein actually *confirms* that this *is* in the cards—and that they'll be fired as soon as Trump becomes a target. Which—hey!—maybe the FBI and DOJ *know*? LOL at Trump. reageer retweet
Comey is degene die het hele circus in gang heeft gezet. Hij lult zich zelf in ieder interview finaal klem.twitter:esaagar twitterde op donderdag 19-04-2018 om 22:22:11Comey says he did not have confidence in Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, which prompted his leak and effort to spark a special counsel reageer retweet
Dat gaat met het vertrek van Ryan alleen maar minder worden. Die staat bekend als een fundraising kanon, maar nu hij speaker af is, is hij dat appeal nu wel kwijt.quote:Op donderdag 19 april 2018 23:08 schreef Monolith het volgende:
Qua fundraising gaat het ook nog niet echt lekker voor de Republikeinen:
https://www.politico.com/(...)2018-midterms-493823
quote:Former New York mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani, a combative former prosecutor and longtime ally of President Trump, told The Washington Post on Thursday that he has joined the president’s legal team dealing with the ongoing special counsel probe.
“I’m doing it because I hope we can negotiate an end to this for the good of the country and because I have high regard for the president and for Bob Mueller,” Giuliani said in an interview.
Giuliani, who joins a legal team that has struggled to recruit new members to its ranks, said he has been speaking with Trump for weeks about joining the group of legal advisers. He said he would work alongside Trump’s current attorneys, Jay Sekulow and Ty Cobb, who focus on the federal investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. He also said he will soon take a leave from his law firm, Greenberg Traurig.
Giuliani said he formalized his decision in recent days, including over dinner last week at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida.SPOILEROm spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.twitter:SethAbramson twitterde op donderdag 19-04-2018 om 23:19:26I'm so excited by this. Giuliani was a major election crook in October 2016, receiving and disseminating many illegal NYPD and FBI leaks (most false) to try to help Trump win. So yes, let's get him front and center so we can grill him daily on what he did. https://t.co/bmPYaqo5nP reageer retweet
twitter:SethAbramson twitterde op donderdag 19-04-2018 om 23:23:08So Trump has just hired, as his new attorney, an almost certain witness in the Mueller probe. That means he will be paying money to, and sharing his own confidential testimony with, a fellow Mueller witness. This is both Obstruction and Witness Tampering. But hey, who's counting? https://t.co/vPvvEvWX47 reageer retweet
twitter:SethAbramson twitterde op donderdag 19-04-2018 om 23:25:142/ Understand what this allows Trump to do (or what he *thinks* it does): allows him to discuss the Russia case and the pre-election Clinton email hoaxes with Giuliani, synch up his testimony, then ensure Giuliani can't discuss those conversations with Mueller.He's transparent. reageer retweet
[ Bericht 17% gewijzigd door Kijkertje op 19-04-2018 23:35:13 ]“The fundamental cause of the trouble in the modern world today is that the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.”— Bertrand Russell
Ik denk niet dat Ryan heel veel impact heeft op fundraising voor lokale races. Je ziet nu in de special elections wel vaak dat de RNC nog bijspringt, maar dat is niet echt een optie bij de midterms.quote:Op donderdag 19 april 2018 23:11 schreef westwoodblvd het volgende:
[..]
Dat gaat met het vertrek van Ryan alleen maar minder worden. Die staat bekend als een fundraising kanon, maar nu hij speaker af is, is hij dat appeal nu wel kwijt.
Gaat nog leuk worden. McCabe heeft al vaker aangegeven te gaan zingen en niet alleen tenonder wil gaan.quote:Op donderdag 19 april 2018 20:43 schreef ExtraWaskracht het volgende:
McCabe overigens mogelijk wel in de problemen met een referral van de DOJ inspector general naar een US attorney (ook geen aanklacht vooralsnog) :
[..]
Ik weet niet wat dit betekent. Wat zou bij dan weten en wat heeft hij gezegd?quote:Op donderdag 19 april 2018 23:18 schreef Refragmental het volgende:
[..]
Gaat nog leuk worden. McCabe heeft al vaker aangegeven te gaan zingen en niet alleen tenonder wil gaan.
Nou, weet ik niet. Ryan heeft tot dusver al 40 miljoen binnengeharkt voor de NRCC voor 2018 en dat gaat echt niet allemaal op aan special elections.quote:Op donderdag 19 april 2018 23:18 schreef Monolith het volgende:
[..]
Ik denk niet dat Ryan heel veel impact heeft op fundraising voor lokale races. Je ziet nu in de special elections wel vaak dat de RNC nog bijspringt, maar dat is niet echt een optie bij de midterms.
twitter:brookefoxnews twitterde op donderdag 19-04-2018 om 23:27:36Trying to get all news in this tweet: #mccabe criminal referral; DAG Rosenstein tells POTUS he’s not part of SDNY #MichaelCohen probe; Rudy Giuliana joins POTUS legal team; #comeymemos will be sent to congressional committees; it’s 5:27pm. reageer retweet
twitter:SethAbramson twitterde op donderdag 19-04-2018 om 23:39:43Oh Rudy https://t.co/sm8LHqXLxw reageer retweet
quote:However, in the burgeoning spirit of openness and diplomacy, Moon said Kim is willing to give up US troops' removal as a precondition for discussions over denuclearizing the Korean Peninsula.
"North Korea has expressed willingness to give up its nuclear program without making (a) demand that the (US Forces Korea) forces withdraw from the Korean Peninsula,"
Justice Department watchdog to report on Clinton-related FBI leakstwitter:StevenJHarper1 twitterde op donderdag 19-04-2018 om 23:47:23@SethAbramson Giuliani might rival Joe diGenova as the shortest-tenured member of Trump's legal team. Timing is everything: https://t.co/VWZHB6aoIM reageer retweet
quote:A long-awaited U.S. Justice Department internal watchdog report on former FBI chief James Comey's public disclosures on Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server while secretary of state and whether FBI employees leaked information to try to hurt her 2016 presidential bid is expected to be issued next month.
The report from Michael Horowitz, the department's inspector general, arises from an investigation he launched about a week before Republican President Donald Trump, who defeated Democrat Clinton in the election, took office in January 2017.
In a letter last week to Republican Representative Trey Gowdy, chairman of the House of Representatives Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Horowitz said his office was "working diligently" to complete the report and expected to release it in May.
Horowitz's letter did not offer details of what will be in the report. In a Jan. 12, 2017 letter to five congressional committees, he enumerated 2016 election-related issues his office would look into.
Clinton has called the FBI investigation into her emails and Comey's public disclosures about it significant factors in her loss to Trump, who fired Comey as FBI director in May 2017.
The investigation will examine Comey's statements in August 2016 that no charges would be brought against Clinton and in October about the re-opening of the FBI investigation into her use of a private email server rather than a government server, potentially jeopardizing classified information.
The report also is expected to address whether active and retired FBI agents in New York leaked information about investigations of the Clinton Foundation charitable organization and the discovery of a trove of Clinton-related emails.
Law enforcement officials previously told Reuters the information was leaked to former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, an adviser to the Trump campaign who subsequently discussed the contents on Fox News.
Horowitz's office also has sought to determine whether such leaks influenced Comey's decision 11 days before the election to announce the reopening of the Clinton email investigation. Law enforcement sources with knowledge of the matter, speaking on condition of anonymity, said at the time a fear of leaks from within his own agency helped prompt Comey to make that public disclosure.
Comey did not respond to a request for comment.
Trump and Comey have exchanged harsh criticism in the past week. Trump called Comey a "slime ball." Comey called Trump an unethical liar who is morally unfit to be president.
Win-win voor Trump. Ze kunnen hun verklaringen afstemmen en alle gesprekken blijven beschermd.quote:Op donderdag 19 april 2018 23:50 schreef ExtraWaskracht het volgende:
Als Giuliani deel uit maakte van Trumps campagne... maakt dat hem geen getuige voor Mueller? Kan Trump hem dan wel inhuren als advocaat in deze zaak?
Het kan ook worden gezien als witness tampering.quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 00:00 schreef westwoodblvd het volgende:
[..]
Win-win voor Trump. Ze kunnen hun verklaringen afstemmen en alle gesprekken blijven beschermd.
Wel lastig om te bewijzen als je niet kunt weten wat er besproken is.quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 00:05 schreef Ulx het volgende:
[..]
Het kan ook worden gezien als witness tampering.
quote:Kushner Cos. Subpoenaed Over Tenant Records (WSJ)
Action relates to paperwork the company filed in New York about rent-regulated tenants
WASHINGTON—The real-estate company run by the family of White House adviser Jared Kushner in mid-March received a federal grand-jury subpoena for information related to paperwork the company filed in New York City concerning its rent-regulated tenants, according to people familiar with the matter.
The subpoena, part of an investigation by prosecutors in the Brooklyn U.S. attorney’s office, came shortly after an Associated Press article about the company having filed documents that said it had zero rent-regulated tenants, when in fact it had hundreds, an omission that relieved them of certain rules governing developers.
The Kushner Cos., where President Donald Trump’s son-in-law was chief executive before joining the administration, said at the time of the Associated Press article that the paperwork was done by a third party and that “if mistakes or violations are identified, corrective action is taken immediately.”
A spokeswoman for the company said Thursday that “Kushner Companies has nothing to hide and is cooperating fully with all legitimate requests for information, including this subpoena.” She added: “We believe that this subpoena, which has already been complied with, was issued based solely on an article that appeared in the press the day before it was issued.”
A spokesman for the U.S. attorney’s office, John Marzulli, said: “I can’t confirm or deny the existence of any subpoena or investigation.”SPOILEROm spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.
Lijkt me sterk dat dat onder attorney client privilege valt?quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 00:00 schreef westwoodblvd het volgende:
[..]
Win-win voor Trump. Ze kunnen hun verklaringen afstemmen en alle gesprekken blijven beschermd.
quote:Op donderdag 19 april 2018 23:16 schreef westwoodblvd het volgende:
Intussen is de communicatiestrategie van de RNC afgedaald tot het niveau zeurderige kleuter:
RNC sending 'Lyin Lion' mascot to follow Comey around on book tour
http://thehill.com/homene(...)tter_impression=true
Dat is toch al gepost?quote:Op donderdag 19 april 2018 23:50 schreef ExtraWaskracht het volgende:
Als Giuliani deel uit maakte van Trumps campagne... maakt dat hem geen getuige voor Mueller? Kan Trump hem dan wel inhuren als advocaat in deze zaak?
Die tweets van Seth toch? Wel zijn mening uiteraard.quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 00:19 schreef ExtraWaskracht het volgende:
[..]
Oh, waar kan ik het antwoord lezen?
Ah, heb daar overheen gelezen. Mogelijk dat die later aan de post zijn toegevoegd.quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 00:21 schreef Whiskers2009 het volgende:
[..]
Die tweets van Seth toch? Wel zijn mening uiteraard.
Klopt!quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 00:26 schreef ExtraWaskracht het volgende:
[..]
Ah, heb daar overheen gelezen. Mogelijk dat die later aan de post zijn toegevoegd.
twitter:DanaBashCNN twitterde op donderdag 19-04-2018 om 23:59:12just talked to Giuliani who said his role on Trump team is limited. He worked with Mueller at DOJ & as NYC Mayor (Mueller at FBI) He hopes knowing Mueller can help bring the investigation to conclusion, saying it "needs a little push." How soon? "maybe a couple of weeks" reageer retweet
Ah, ok. Dat had ik dan weer gemistquote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 00:26 schreef ExtraWaskracht het volgende:
[..]
Ah, heb daar overheen gelezen. Mogelijk dat die later aan de post zijn toegevoegd.
twitter:RVAwonk twitterde op donderdag 19-04-2018 om 23:42:49Here's Rudy Giuliani in Nov. 2016, admitting that the FBI had leaked information to the Trump campaign — giving them advanced warning about Comey's letter. https://t.co/6lOvlouFPl reageer retweet
Wat een BS, alsof Giuliani even gaat bepalen wanneer het onderzoek afgelopen is. Het onderzoek is afgelopen als alle feiten boven tafel zijn en alle sporen uitgezocht zijn. Niet eerder.quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 00:33 schreef Kijkertje het volgende:
twitter:DanaBashCNN twitterde op donderdag 19-04-2018 om 23:59:12just talked to Giuliani who said his role on Trump team is limited. He worked with Mueller at DOJ & as NYC Mayor (Mueller at FBI) He hopes knowing Mueller can help bring the investigation to conclusion, saying it "needs a little push." How soon? "maybe a couple of weeks" reageer retweet
Echt he! Zou hij dat nou zelf geloven?quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 01:46 schreef westwoodblvd het volgende:
[..]
Wat een BS, alsof Giuliani even gaat bepalen wanneer het onderzoek afgelopen is. Het onderzoek is afgelopen als alle feiten boven tafel zijn en alle sporen uitgezocht zijn. Niet eerder.
http://thehill.com/blogs/(...)ould-never-have-beenquote:Former FBI director James Comey said Thursday if he could “change time” so that Anthony Weiner had never “been born.”
Comey made the comment about the former New York representative during an interview with New Yorker editor David Remnick.
“If I could change time, Hillary Clinton wouldn’t have used a private email server,” he said, according to The New Yorker’s live tweets of the event. “Anthony Weiner certainly wouldn’t have a laptop — maybe wouldn’t have even been born.”
twitter:joshrogin twitterde op vrijdag 20-04-2018 om 04:35:58Comey tells @maddow he commissioned an internal FBI investigation into leaks to Giuliani about the Hillary investigation. Wow. reageer retweet
Hoe kan het een witch hunt zijn als hij geen target is?quote:Op donderdag 19 april 2018 22:46 schreef Nintex het volgende:
Trump heeft gelijk. Het is een witch hunt.twitter:business twitterde op donderdag 19-04-2018 om 21:36:18Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein told Trump last week that he isn’t a target of any part of Mueller’s investigation, sources say https://t.co/FIZcWqzs57 https://t.co/ivpq0sgoxS reageer retweet
Groot gelijk Montov, maar dat ga je van Nontex niet krijgen, die komt hier alleen om te trollen...quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 06:15 schreef Montov het volgende:
[..]
Hoe kan het een witch hunt zijn als hij geen target is?
Zijn criminele vrienden worden aangepakt en Trump reageert alsof hij zelf wordt aangepakt. Dat zegt genoeg over zijn betrokkenheid en pogingen om het onderzoek te saboteren.
Hoe zou een onwetend en onschuldig persoon zich gedragen wanneer blijkt dat je campagnemensen, familie en juridisch team zo moerassig als de pest zijn? Ik zou me verraden voelen door die zogenaamde vrienden. Trump voelt zich verraden door mensen die de waarheid achterhalen, openbaren en onderzoeken.
Hij spreekt alleen voor zijn eigen achterban, en die weten inderdaad niet beter.quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 09:02 schreef AnneX het volgende:
Smakelijk nieuws weer vannacht.
Deze kwam ik tegen https://www.msnbc.com/bri(...)t-know-1215264835609
Die begon ook al op te vallen...
Gezien Trump’s obsessie, moeten de pee pee tapes wel bestaan, elk gesprek met Comey komt hij er op terug!quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 08:48 schreef westwoodblvd het volgende:
Nu Coney's memos door DoJ naar Congress zijn gestuurd zijn ze natuurlijk meteen gelekt zodat Nunes er niet maandenlang selectief informatie uit kan loslaten in de vorm van mistekenende werkstukjes. Comey's memo's zijn hier te lezen:
https://www.documentcloud(...)s-Comey-s-memos.html
quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 11:19 schreef SureD1 het volgende:
[..]
Gezien Trump’s obsessie, moeten de pee pee tapes wel bestaan, elk gesprek met Comey komt hij er op terug!
twitter:SethAbramson twitterde op vrijdag 20-04-2018 om 09:04:3639/ That Trump brings McCabe and the golden showers up in every conversation with Comey is legitimately insane—100% abnormal. That Putin and he discussed hookers—repeat, *Putin and Trump discussed hookers*—is shocking in part because we don't know when that conversation occurred. reageer retweet
* ril*quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 11:19 schreef SureD1 het volgende:
[..]
Gezien Trump’s obsessie, moeten de pee pee tapes wel bestaan, elk gesprek met Comey komt hij er op terug!
Gelukkig is het nu wel voorbij met die onzin. Donald Trump als lichtend voorbeeld voor ons allen weet wat men moet doen. Of liever laten.quote:
twitter:kylegriffin1 twitterde op vrijdag 20-04-2018 om 05:15:02In closed-door meetings at the U.N., Trump officials pushed socially conservative views on women’s rights issues—like abstinence-based policies—further to the right than those expressed by most other countries present, including Russia, BuzzFeed reports. https://t.co/L0fELYbol1 reageer retweet
De kiezer? zowel in de states als in Rusland? Ik doe maar een gok.quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 11:48 schreef Nintex het volgende:
Nee, ze hebben over wie ze nu weer genaaid hebben![]()
Het past in Trumps' MO om het hardste te klagen over dingen die waar zijn. Zo wond hij zich ook enorm op over de toeschouwersaantallen bij zijn inauguratie, maar veel minder over bijvoorbeeld berichten dat hij een pruik draagt (wat hoogstwaarschijnlijk niet waar is).quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 11:28 schreef Ulx het volgende:
[..]twitter:SethAbramson twitterde op vrijdag 20-04-2018 om 09:04:3639/ That Trump brings McCabe and the golden showers up in every conversation with Comey is legitimately insane—100% abnormal. That Putin and he discussed hookers—repeat, *Putin and Trump discussed hookers*—is shocking in part because we don't know when that conversation occurred. reageer retweet
En Trump die gaat vertellen dat je abstinace moet nastreven, terwijl hij zelf elke passerende pornoster er even naast doet.quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 12:21 schreef Ulx het volgende:
Twee wereldleiders die over hoertjes aan het keuvelen zijn... Het roept ook wel vraagtekens op.
Shadey?twitter:realDonaldTrump twitterde op vrijdag 20-04-2018 om 12:34:16So General Michael Flynn’s life can be totally destroyed while Shadey James Comey can Leak and Lie and make lots of money from a third rate book (that should never have been written). Is that really the way life in America is supposed to work? I don’t think so! reageer retweet
Het zou niemand moeten verbazen, na het lekken van die opnames dat hij maar wat graag opschept over vrouwen bij het kruis grijpen.quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 12:21 schreef Ulx het volgende:
Twee wereldleiders die over hoertjes aan het keuvelen zijn... Het roept ook wel vraagtekens op.
quote:Chris Christie is sparing no expense when it comes to his official portrait, which is being paid for with public funds. The former New Jersey Republican governor is commemorating his eight years in office, which ended in January, with a painting of himself by Australian artist Paul Newton. He signed an $85,000 contract for the work the month before his term ended.
The price is more than the state’s three previous governors paid for their portraits combined, reports The Record, which revealed the extravagant expenditure on Thursday. Newton has previously painted the portraits of Australian singer Kylie Minogue, Pope Benedict XVI and Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh.
In 2017, Christie was infamously snapped vacationing with his family on an otherwise vacant state-owned beach that he’d earlier closed due to a budget impasse. Some people on Twitter suggested that Christie, who also once spent more than $82,000 in public money on concessions at NFL games, should use photographs taken that beach day for his portrait instead:
Whatever, dude.twitter:realDonaldTrump twitterde op vrijdag 20-04-2018 om 12:50:38Nancy Pelosi is going absolutely crazy about the big Tax Cuts given to the American People by the Republicans...got not one Democrat Vote! Here’s a choice. They want to end them and raise your taxes substantially. Republicans are working on making them permanent and more cuts! reageer retweet
Flynn plant een comeback. Te dom voor woorden, maargoed.quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 12:39 schreef Ulx het volgende:
De oelewapper is weer wakker.Shadey?twitter:realDonaldTrump twitterde op vrijdag 20-04-2018 om 12:34:16So General Michael Flynn’s life can be totally destroyed while Shadey James Comey can Leak and Lie and make lots of money from a third rate book (that should never have been written). Is that really the way life in America is supposed to work? I don’t think so! reageer retweet
The Trump-O-Meter staat op Bat Shit Crazy vandaag.twitter:realDonaldTrump twitterde op vrijdag 20-04-2018 om 12:57:12Looks like OPEC is at it again. With record amounts of Oil all over the place, including the fully loaded ships at sea, Oil prices are artificially Very High! No good and will not be accepted! reageer retweet
Ben je nou gewoon random one-liners aan het roeptoeteren of?quote:
Ja.quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 13:01 schreef DustPuppy het volgende:
[..]
Ben je nou gewoon random one-liners aan het roeptoeteren of?
Dit draait allemaal om Aramco.quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 13:00 schreef Ulx het volgende:
The Trump-O-Meter staat op Bat Shit Crazy vandaag.twitter:realDonaldTrump twitterde op vrijdag 20-04-2018 om 12:57:12Looks like OPEC is at it again. With record amounts of Oil all over the place, including the fully loaded ships at sea, Oil prices are artificially Very High! No good and will not be accepted! reageer retweet
quote:President Donald Trump floated the idea of jailing journalists to stop leaks from the White House, former FBI Director James Comey wrote in a memo last year in which he recalled an encounter with the president. The document was published by various news outlets on Thursday just hours after the Department of Justice released copies to congressional leaders.
“The president then wrapped up our conversation by returning to the issue of finding leakers,” Comey wrote in the document, dated Feb. 14, 2017. “I said something about the value of putting a head on a pike as a message. He replied by saying it may involve putting reporters in jail.”
″‘They spend a couple days in jail, make a new friend, and they are ready to talk,’” Comey recounted the president saying. “I laughed as I walked to the door Reince Priebus had opened.”
The New York Times first reported the encounter last May.SPOILEROm spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.
Flynn heeft ook zitten lekken?quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 12:39 schreef Ulx het volgende:
De oelewapper is weer wakker.Shadey?twitter:realDonaldTrump twitterde op vrijdag 20-04-2018 om 12:34:16So General Michael Flynn’s life can be totally destroyed while Shadey James Comey can Leak and Lie and make lots of money from a third rate book (that should never have been written). Is that really the way life in America is supposed to work? I don’t think so! reageer retweet
Flynn werkt zelfs mee met Mueller. Dat lijkt Trump vergeten te zijn.quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 13:10 schreef ExtraWaskracht het volgende:
[..]
Flynn heeft ook zitten lekken?
*ouch*twitter:kylegriffin1 twitterde op vrijdag 20-04-2018 om 14:00:01A federal appeals court has ruled that local governments don't need to provide certain types of help to federal immigration authorities in order to get federal grants, thereby preventing the Trump admin from denying funds to sanctuary cities. https://t.co/p0zOzw9J3E reageer retweet
Echt weer dom geneuzel dit. Door hoge olieprijzen wordt het aantrekkelijker voor oliemaatschappijen te investeren in nieuwe projecten en zodoende jobs te creëren. Die schaliegasprojecten zijn pas een beetje rendabel vanaf 50 dollar het vat.quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 13:00 schreef Ulx het volgende:
The Trump-O-Meter staat op Bat Shit Crazy vandaag.twitter:realDonaldTrump twitterde op vrijdag 20-04-2018 om 12:57:12Looks like OPEC is at it again. With record amounts of Oil all over the place, including the fully loaded ships at sea, Oil prices are artificially Very High! No good and will not be accepted! reageer retweet
Als de regering Trump ons een ding leert dan is het wel de relevantie van de onafhankelijke derde macht.quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 14:02 schreef Ulx het volgende:
*ouch*twitter:kylegriffin1 twitterde op vrijdag 20-04-2018 om 14:00:01A federal appeals court has ruled that local governments don't need to provide certain types of help to federal immigration authorities in order to get federal grants, thereby preventing the Trump admin from denying funds to sanctuary cities. https://t.co/p0zOzw9J3E reageer retweet
Dat zal Trump niet leuk vinden.
Maar hoe krijg je dan het land weer aan de steenkool?quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 14:13 schreef Falco het volgende:
[..]
Echt weer dom geneuzel dit. Door hoge olieprijzen wordt het aantrekkelijker voor oliemaatschappijen te investeren in nieuwe projecten en zodoende jobs te creëren. Die schaliegasprojecten zijn pas een beetje rendabel vanaf 50 dollar het vat.
Zie o.a. dit plaatje:
[ afbeelding ]
quote:
Schiff legt het ook nog even uit.twitter:RepAdamSchiff twitterde op vrijdag 20-04-2018 om 14:51:45The memos do not discuss collusion, Mr. President, but they do show you clearing the room and asking Director Comey to drop the Flynn case. Along with your repeated requests for loyalty and to “lift the cloud,” this is all evidence of potential obstruction. https://t.co/2DGF32doHp reageer retweet
ze malen en verkopen het als coke..quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 14:28 schreef Ulx het volgende:
[..]
Maar hoe krijg je dan het land weer aan de steenkool?
Ik vind hem wel wat hebben van Charlie Brown, die heeft ook zo'n groot rond hoofd..quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 14:56 schreef Ulx het volgende:
Schiff legt het ook nog even uit.twitter:RepAdamSchiff twitterde op vrijdag 20-04-2018 om 14:51:45The memos do not discuss collusion, Mr. President, but they do show you clearing the room and asking Director Comey to drop the Flynn case. Along with your repeated requests for loyalty and to “lift the cloud,” this is all evidence of potential obstruction. https://t.co/2DGF32doHp reageer retweet
SPOILEROm spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.twitter:SethAbramson twitterde op vrijdag 20-04-2018 om 10:17:562/ So Comey is saying—bizarrely—that someone *falsely* leaked to the New York Times, the *day after* he sent his letter to Congress, that concerns about leaks from the New York field office were critical to Comey's decision to re-open the Clinton case. Who leaked that, and *why*? reageer retweet
twitter:SethAbramson twitterde op vrijdag 20-04-2018 om 10:20:273/ Comey's reply—leaks were irrelevant to my letter to Congress—echoes him being unwilling to say Clinton would be a better POTUS than Trump and his flailing defenses of the FBI. He may *think* he's being honest; he's playing politics. I don't think he even admits it to himself. reageer retweet
twitter:SethAbramson twitterde op vrijdag 20-04-2018 om 10:25:244/ Remember, too, that Comey won't/can't discuss why nothing was done on the Clinton case from October 3 to 26—and why he gave it no attention and (perhaps) McCabe didn't or was expecting others to. That's the *other* NYC field office shenanigan we'll hear more about eventually. reageer retweet
Goed zo! D'r gaat echt heel veel van downtrickelen. Echt waar.twitter:kylegriffin1 twitterde op vrijdag 20-04-2018 om 15:40:05An analysis by The AP shows the nation's six big Wall Street banks saved at least $3,590,000,000 in taxes last quarter, thanks to the recently enacted Trump tax law. https://t.co/vGpOve277J reageer retweet
Serieuze vraag, geloof je dit echt? Los van de inhoud kom je niet over als een hele domme jongen.quote:
quote:In May 1984, an official from the Trump Organization called to tell me how rich Donald J. Trump was. I was reporting for the Forbes 400, the magazine’s annual ranking of America’s richest people, for the third year. In the previous edition, we’d valued Trump’s holdings at $200 million, only one-fifth of what he claimed to own in our interviews. This time, his aide urged me on the phone, I needed to understand just how loaded Trump really was.
The official was John Barron — a name we now know as an alter ego of Trump himself. When I recently rediscovered and listened, for first time since that year, to the tapes I made of this and other phone calls, I was amazed that I didn’t see through the ruse: Although Trump altered some cadences and affected a slightly stronger New York accent, it was clearly him. “Barron” told me that Trump had taken possession of the business he ran with his father, Fred. “Most of the assets have been consolidated to Mr. Trump,” he said. “You have down Fred Trump [as half owner] . . . but I think you can really use Donald Trump now.” Trump, through this sockpuppet, was telling me he owned “in excess of 90 percent” of his family’s business. With all the home runs Trump was hitting in real estate, Barron told me, he should be called a billionaire.
At the time, I suspected that some of this was untrue. I ran Trump’s assertions to the ground, and for many years I was proud of the fact that Forbes had called him on his distortions and based his net worth on what I thought was solid research.
But it took decades to unwind the elaborate farce Trump had built to project an image as one of the richest people in America. Nearly every assertion supporting that claim was untrue. Trump wasn’t just poorer than he said he was. Over time I have learned that he should not have been on the first three Forbes 400 lists at all. In our first-ever list, in 1982, we included him at $100 million, but Trump was actually worth roughly $5 million — a paltry sum by the standards of his super-monied peers — as a spate of government reports and books showed only much later.
The White House declined to comment for this story. The Trump Organization did not respond to a request for comment.SPOILEROm spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.“The fundamental cause of the trouble in the modern world today is that the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.”— Bertrand Russell
Opa heeft rust nodig.twitter:kylegriffin1 twitterde op vrijdag 20-04-2018 om 16:35:52Per pool, Trump has arrived at Trump International Golf Club in FL.This is Trump’s 108th day at a Trump golf club as president. reageer retweet
Nintex is een gokverslaafde pokerspeler die All-in is gegaan met een 2 en een Joker. Dan moet je tot het bittere einde blijven bluffen.quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 16:19 schreef Bernhard.von.Galen het volgende:
[..]
Serieuze vraag, geloof je dit echt? Los van de inhoud kom je niet over als een hele domme jongen.
Haha dank je. Deze gedachte helpt wel om zijn posts te begrijpen.quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 16:58 schreef Montov het volgende:
[..]
Nintex is een gokverslaafde pokerspeler die All-in is gegaan met een 2 en een Joker. Dan moet je tot het bittere einde blijven bluffen.
Prachtige beschrijving.quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 16:58 schreef Montov het volgende:
[..]
Nintex is een gokverslaafde pokerspeler die All-in is gegaan met een 2 en een Joker. Dan moet je tot het bittere einde blijven bluffen.
Een joker bij het pokeren?quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 16:58 schreef Montov het volgende:
[..]
Nintex is een gokverslaafde pokerspeler die All-in is gegaan met een 2 en een Joker. Dan moet je tot het bittere einde blijven bluffen.
De joker is een miljardair, dus hij zal weten hoe het spelletje werkt.quote:
Een joker en de kaart met instructies. Dan moet je pas bluffen.quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 17:39 schreef Montov het volgende:
[..]
De joker is een miljardair, dus hij zal weten hoe het spelletje werkt.
Ik wilde eerst nog kiezen voor een joker en een bisschop om er 4d schaken van te maken, maar het schaakstuk heet in het Nederlands een loper, dus dat was wat minder toepasselijk.
Ik ben gewoon niet goed genoeg om een fulltime Twitter komiek te worden, helaas.
I see what you did there.quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 12:45 schreef Belabor het volgende:
Het zou niemand moeten verbazen, na het lekken van die opnames dat hij maar wat graag opschept over vrouwen bij het kruis grijpen.
Voor een man met zijn ego is er ook niks raars aan die mysoginie, past perfect in zijn persoonlijkheidskader.
Daarom (en om vele andere redenen) is deze man ook volledig ongeschikt als president. Maar goed, dat roep ik al sinds 2016 maar de Amerikanen zien dat blijkbaar anders.
Wat gaat er mis bij jouw quote?quote:
twitter:Breaking911 twitterde op vrijdag 20-04-2018 om 17:50:14The Democratic Party filed a federal lawsuit alleging a conspiracy by the Trump campaign, Russia and WikiLeaks to disrupt the 2016 presidential election. - Fox News reageer retweet
twitter:thehill twitterde op vrijdag 20-04-2018 om 18:04:04JUST IN: Russia: Trump invited Putin to the White House https://t.co/Be0NwwT0OW https://t.co/muxtFzvegS reageer retweet
Voor degenen die net als Nintex willen lachen om de hoeveelheid shit waarin de republikeinen zitten, hier is het hele document: https://www.lawfareblog.c(...)lection-interferencequote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 18:19 schreef Nintex het volgende:
twitter:Breaking911 twitterde op vrijdag 20-04-2018 om 17:50:14The Democratic Party filed a federal lawsuit alleging a conspiracy by the Trump campaign, Russia and WikiLeaks to disrupt the 2016 presidential election. - Fox News reageer retweet
quote:Under the law of the United States, civil discovery is wide-ranging and may seek disclosure of information that is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.[4] This is a much broader standard than relevance, because it contemplates the exploration of evidence which might be relevant, rather than evidence which is truly relevant.
Ik vermoed omdat er nog geen bewijs is dat Trump persoonlijk betrokken was. Je zou hem alleen maar de kans geven om dat te zeggen, maakt je zaak niet sterker. Daarnaast kom je dan in de sfeer van presidentiële immuniteit, al kan Trump daar geen beroep op doen voor zaken van voor hij president was.quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 20:54 schreef ExtraWaskracht het volgende:
Wat zaken die ik me dan als leek afvraag: hoezo geen Trump zelf?
Ja, op zich wel logisch eigenlijk ... je kunt moeilijk random mensen gaan aanklagen en om Trump zelf aan te klagen zonder dat je bewijs hebt dat hij onderdeel uitmaakte van de samenzwering zou potentieel een PR fiasco zijn.quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 21:01 schreef Tchock het volgende:
[..]
Ik vermoed omdat er nog geen bewijs is dat Trump persoonlijk betrokken was. Je zou hem alleen maar de kans geven om dat te zeggen, maakt je zaak niet sterker. Daarnaast kom je dan in de sfeer van presidentiële immuniteit, al kan Trump daar geen beroep op doen voor zaken van voor hij president was.
Bovendien kan ik me nog voorstellen dat een aanklacht tegen de Trump org. indirect toch wel Trump raakt. Als je eenmaal hebt aangetoond dat de organisatie en haar medewerkers iets fout deden, is het voor de grote baas lastig te beweren dat hij er niets van wist.quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 21:04 schreef ExtraWaskracht het volgende:
[..]
Ja, op zich wel logisch eigenlijk ... je kunt moeilijk random mensen gaan aanklagen en om Trump zelf aan te klagen zonder dat je bewijs hebt dat hij onderdeel uitmaakte van de samenzwering zou potentieel een PR fiasco zijn.
Ja, dat gaat een groot mediafeest worden. Enig idee wat nu de procedure gaat zijn en met wat voor termijn discovery zou gaan beginnen?quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 20:59 schreef crystal_meth het volgende:
De hack bracht al hun interne communicatie naar buiten, nu kunnen ze het Trump kamp hetzelfde aandoen. Met het discovery process kunnen ze veel meer te weten komen en openbaar maken dan wat Mueller's onderzoek zal opleveren.
[..]
Hoeveel shit, en wat is de kans van slagen? Ik lees verder niet in die link, of kijk ik verkeerd?quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 18:22 schreef Mike het volgende:
[..]
Voor degenen die net als Nintex willen lachen om de hoeveelheid shit waarin de republikeinen zitten, hier is het hele document: https://www.lawfareblog.c(...)lection-interference
quote:O'Brien Sues GOP Campaign
Lays Blame For Bugging on White House
By Bob Woodward
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, June 21, 1972; Page A01
Democratic National Chairman Lawrence F. O'Brien, apparently seizing on the break-in and attempted bugging of party headquarters here as a major campaign issue, attempted yesterday to lay responsibility for the incident at the door of the White House.
He said there is "a developing clear line to the white House," and cited what he called the "potential involvement" of special counsel to the President, Charles Colson.
O'Brien made his remarks as the Democratic National Committee filed a $l million suit in U.S. District Court here against the Committee for the re-election of the President, whose chief security agent was one of five men arrested at the break-in at 2:30 a.m. on Saturday.
President Nixon's campaign chairman, former Attorney General John N. Mitchell, again deplored the bugging incident, denied any party responsibility for it and called the law suit "another example of sheer demagoguery on the part of Mr. O'Brien."
In other developments yesterday:
• White House consultant and former CIA employee Howard E. Hunt, whose name was found in two of the suspects' address books, was reported to be a "good friend" of the suspects' first attorney, Douglas Caddy.
• Federal sources close to the investigation said that a diagram that could have been used in a past or future bugging attempt on Miami Beach headquarters on Sen. George S. McGovern was found among the suspects' belongings.
• Sources in the FBI said that agents were ordered to question Hunt yesterday, but the sources were unable to indicate if Hunt had been reached. This was the first indication that the government thought Hunt might have some information about the bugging.
Sen. William Proxmire (D-Wis.) charged yesterday that the Federal Reserve Board "ducked, misled, hid out, avoided calls" and gave him "the idiot treatment" in connection with his request that the board produce the name of the bank involved in issuing 58 $l00 bills seized from the five suspects.
Proxmire, ranking Democratic member of the Senate Banking Committee, said that the board's failure to act "suggests they have something to hide."
Banks are required to record details of any transaction involving sums over 5,000 or large federal reserve notes.
O'Brien charged that Mitchell attempted to make it appear that former CIA employee James W. McCord Jr., the security agent who was arrested Saturday, had ended his employment with the Nixon committee some months ago.
Until Monday McCord was the salaried security chief for the committee. Mitchell's first statement Sunday on McCord's employment with the committee was that McCord was employed months ago.
"We know that as of the moment of his arrest at gunpoint just l0 feet from where I now stand, Mr. McCord was in the pay of the Committee for the Re-election of the President," O'Brien said.
"If John Mitchell's reflex attempt to conceal that fact is any signal of what is to come from the Republican Party and administration, I fear we shall be long in getting at the truth."
O'Brien went on to call the incident a "cheap cloak-and-dagger intrigue at the national political level. We learned of this bugging attempt only because it was bungled. How many other attempts have there been? And just who was involved?"
He said the lawsuit was an attempt to force the issue into examination by the court. A Democratic spokesman said court hearings on the matter could begin in "the near future."
"I believe we are about to witness the ultimate test of this administration that so piously committed itself to a new era of law and order just four years ago." O'Brien said.
In a prepared statement, Mitchell called O'Brien's suit a "political stunt."
"This committee did not authorize and does not condone the alleged actions of the five men apprehended Saturday morning. We abhor such activity.
"The Committee for the Re-election of the President is not legally, morally or ethically accountable for actions taken without its knowledge and beyond the scope of its control." Mitchell said.
In yesterday's editions, The Post reported the existence of Hunt's name in the suspects' address books and that he functioned at the White House as an assistant to Colson.
A White House aide confirmed that Colson, who is said to handle delicate assignments for the president, was the man who brought hunt to the White House. The aide, who said Hunt was hired because of his CIA expertise, said Hunt worked on declassifying the Pentagon Papers and, most recently, on narcotics intelligence.
He said Hunt last worked for the White House on March 20.
Presidential spokesman Ronald Ziegler said yesterday morning, "I talked to Mr. Colson after reading The Washington Post story this morning, and he made it clear that he is in no way involved with this matter..." Later Ziegler told reporters that he was finished with any comment on the subject.:
Federal sources close to the bugging investigation said two large ballrooms scheduled to be used as Miami headquarters for McGovern during the Democratic Convention were diagrammed in another address book taken by authorities from the suspects' belongings.
The rough diagram, a sketch, shows the Regency and Mediterranean rooms at the Doral Hotel on the Ocean in Miami.
It also denotes the location of two emergency exits from the rooms. The word "May" was written by the diagram, apparently a reference to the month, the sources said.
Asked about the diagram yesterday, McGovern's convention coordinator, Owen Donley, confirmed that the rooms have been slated for use by McGovern convention staff since January.
Donley said one room would be used by the news media and the other for staff or delegate caucuses.
"If they wanted to bug the two rooms, it wouldn't bother anyone anyway. They are both public rooms in the hotel. We will hold staff caucuses there, but they will be mass meetings. There wouldn't be anything said there that wouldn't be said out on the street."
Donley said the McGovern campaign staff was exploring various antibugging methods before the Democratic National headquarters incident.
"We didn't suddenly become paranoid. We were paranoid beforehand. That is just part of convention procedure," Donley said. He indicated that antibugging precautions would be taken at the headquarters in Miami.
Hunt, the White House consultant, has a full-time job in the public relations firm of Robert R. Mullen Co., l700 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, directly across from Nixon's re-election headquarters and the chief White House offices.
Yesterday, Robert E. Bennett, president of the Mullen firm, said that Hunt was a "good friend" of the suspects' first attorney, Caddy.
Hunt and Caddy once shared an office at the Mullen firm, according to Bennet. Caddy was not employed there but acted as liaison with General Foods Corp. where he was employed.
In Superior Court here Saturday when the five suspects appeared for arraignment, Caddy was secretive and stayed in the background, bringing in another attorney to represent the five men.
Shortly after 3 a.m. Saturday, Caddy told a reporter, he received a call from the wife of Bernard L. Baker, one of the five men arrested. "She said that her husband told her to call me if he hadn't called her by 3 a.m. that it might mean trouble," Caddy said.
Caddy said he had met Barker once, a year ago, and that they had had a "sympathetic conversation."
Barker, who owns a real estate firm in Miami, has been active in anti-Castro activities and is reported to have played a role in the Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba in l961.
In addition to McCord and Barker, the other three suspects are: Frank Surges, also known as Frank Florini, an American who served in Fiddle Castor's revolutionary army and has since been a leader in the anti-Castro movement in Miami: Virgilio R. Gonzalez, a locksmith; and Eugenio R. Martinez, a real estate salesman for Barker.
McCord was still being held in D.C. jail yesterday on $30,000 bond. The other four were being held there on $50,000 bond. All are charged with attempted burglary and attempted interception of telephone and other communication.
Their attorney, Joseph A. Rafferty Jr., filed a motion yesterday seeking a reduction on the bond.
Meanwhile, yesterday Sen. Bob Dole, head of the Republican National Committee, denied as totally false reports that the Republicans had urged Spanish community leaders and other Republicans not to discuss the bugging incident with anyone.
Staat verder niks idd .. hier wel een WaPo artikel erover: Democratic Party files lawsuit alleging Russia, the Trump campaign and WikiLeaks conspired to disrupt the 2016 campaignquote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 21:52 schreef Montov het volgende:
[..]
Hoeveel shit, en wat is de kans van slagen? Ik lees verder niet in die link, of kijk ik verkeerd?
Zal van de rechter afhangen of het zover komt. Geen idee hoe lang dat kan duren, ik zou verwachten dat de DNC daar rekening mee gehouden heeft toen ze het moment kozen om dit in te dienen... Wanneer zou het voor hen optimaal zijn?quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 21:07 schreef ExtraWaskracht het volgende:
[..]
Ja, dat gaat een groot mediafeest worden. Enig idee wat nu de procedure gaat zijn en met wat voor termijn discovery zou gaan beginnen?
https://www.vox.com/2018/(...)tions-hacking-emailsquote:The DNC may well be hoping to use this new suit to surface more evidence of this, should it proceed to the discovery stage — but as of now, they don’t have the goods on any Trumpworld involvement with the hack and leak that damaged Democrats specifically. (Special counsel Robert Mueller is, of course, continuing to investigate the matter.)
https://www.nytimes.com/2(...)a-trump-lawsuit.htmlquote:Mr. Perez firmly denied that the lawsuit had a political purpose, but he appeared to allude at points to the possibility that civil litigation might bring to light damaging information about Mr. Trump and his associates.
The complaint is largely based on information that has previously been disclosed in news reports and subsequent court proceedings. But if the lawsuit proceeds, the president and his campaign aides could be forced to disclose documents and submit to depositions that require them to answer questions under oath.
To reach the discovery stage, lawsuits have to survive any motion to dismiss the litigation by the defendants.
Mr. Perez suggested, for instance, that Mr. Trump’s tax returns would reveal “shady conduct” if they were ever made public. Asked if part of the lawsuit’s aim was to force such disclosures, Mr. Perez demurred: “I haven’t given that any thought.”
quote:Always a bad sign when the judge tells you that your motion has “gaping holes in it,” as the judge told the attys for MC and DJT this AM. I don’t know why they continue to hide what they know about the FBI raids. Time to come clean and let the chips fall where they may
Het grappige is dat dit juist the American dream is.quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 12:39 schreef Ulx het volgende:
De oelewapper is weer wakker.Shadey?twitter:realDonaldTrump twitterde op vrijdag 20-04-2018 om 12:34:16So General Michael Flynn’s life can be totally destroyed while Shadey James Comey can Leak and Lie and make lots of money from a third rate book (that should never have been written). Is that really the way life in America is supposed to work? I don’t think so! reageer retweet
Dit volg ik niet helemaal... je denkt dat de American dream is zelf oneerlijk groot te worden en de kleintjes te verpulveren oid?quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 22:46 schreef Vis1980 het volgende:
[..]
Het grappige is dat dit juist the American dream is.
sorry, het ging mij meer om het stukje: "...making lots of money with a third rate book.Is that really the way life in America is supposed to work?"quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 23:03 schreef ExtraWaskracht het volgende:
[..]
Dit volg ik niet helemaal... je denkt dat de American dream is zelf oneerlijk groot te worden en de kleintjes te verpulveren oid?
Ik dacht dat de American dream neer kwam op kansen en eerlijkheid van het belonen van hard werken. Dus dat je van arme sloeber zou kunnen opwerken naar rijkaard; met name op basis van inspanning en inzicht ipv vals spelen.quote:Op vrijdag 20 april 2018 23:12 schreef Vis1980 het volgende:
[..]
sorry, het ging mij meer om het stukje: "...making lots of money with a third rate book.Is that really the way life in America is supposed to work?"
Maar inderdaad het 'liegen' over het hoofd gezien. Al maakt dat vaak niet heel veel uit, het doel is uiteindelijk veel geld verdienen.
quote:TRUMP FUNDRAISER OFFERED RUSSIAN GAS COMPANY PLAN TO GET SANCTIONS LIFTED FOR $26 MILLION (The Intercept)
SHORTLY AFTER PRESIDENT Donald Trump was inaugurated last year, top Republican fundraiser Elliott Broidy offered Russian gas giant Novatek a $26 million lobbying plan aimed at removing the company from a U.S. sanctions list, according to documents obtained by The Intercept.
Broidy is a Trump associate who was deputy finance chair of the Republican National Committee until he resigned last week amid reports that he had agreed to pay $1.6 million to a former Playboy model with whom he had an affair. But in February 2017, when he laid out his lobbying proposal for Novatek, he was acting as a well-connected businessman and longtime Republican donor in a bid to help the Russian company avoid sanctions imposed by the Obama administration. The 2014 sanctions were aimed at punishing Russia for annexing Crimea and supporting pro-Russia separatists in eastern Ukraine.
In February 2017, Broidy sent a draft of the plan by email to attorney Andrei Baev, then a Moscow- and London-based lawyer who represented major Russian energy companies for the firm Chadbourne & Parke LLP. Baev had already been communicating with Novatek about finding a way to lift U.S. sanctions.
Broidy proposed arranging meetings with key White House and congressional leaders and generating op-eds and other articles favorable to the Russian company, along with a full suite of lobbying activities to be undertaken by consultants brought on board. Yet even as he offered those services, Broidy was adamant that his company, Fieldcrest Advisors LLC, would not perform lobbying services but would hire others to do it. He suggested that parties to the deal sign a sweeping non-disclosure agreement that would shield their work from public scrutiny.
The plan is outlined in a series of emails and other documents obtained by The Intercept. Broidy and Baev did not dispute the authenticity of the exchanges but said the deal was never consummated.Broidy, die RNC finance pipo in zeden-opspraak die afgetreden is, is ook hier weer terug te vinden ...SPOILEROm spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.
Forum Opties | |
---|---|
Forumhop: | |
Hop naar: |