[AMV] Amerikaanse politiek #461 The General and the pervert

quote:

Dianne Feinstein slams criminal referral: 'Not a single revelation in the Steele dossier has been refuted'

Senate Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., slammed the criminal referral of Christopher Steele by Sens. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., saying it has numerous “flaws” and “omits key facts.”

In a five-page analysis released Friday, Feinstein says the criminal referral is “not based on any allegation” that Steele, the author of the infamous Trump-Russia dossier, lied to FBI investigators about former Trump aide Carter Page, or what was included in the dossier.

“[N]either provide any evidence that any of the information in Steele’s dossier is wrong. Instead, the referral is limited to a single baseless allegation: that Steele lied about his contacts with the press,” the analysis says.

This week Grassley made public more details from the Jan. 4 unclassified criminal referral of Steele. The referral asks the Department of Justice to investigate whether Steele lied to FBI investigators about his communications with the press.

The referral, which was first released in heavily redacted form on Monday, appears to confirm some level of coordination between the extended Clinton circle and the Obama administration in the effort to seek damaging information about then-presidential candidate Donald Trump.

The less-redacted referral fails to provide further illumination on the memo mentioned in the dossier obtained by BuzzFeed, which laid out how Steele allegedly received information from "a foreign sub-source who is in touch with [redacted], a contact of [redacted], a friend of the Clintons, who passed it to [redacted]" — redactions that appeared in the first issuance of the referral.

The unredacted referral does discuss the controversial Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court applications seeking permission for the government to spy on Page.

Feinstein’s analysis claims the Grassley-Graham referral omits “key facts,” because they failed to modify the referral “before and after” the Justice Department provided the committee with documents about its interactions with Steele. This includes an Oct. 19, 2016, report that Steele received information from a “friend of the Clintons.” According to Feinstein, 14 of the 17 memos within the Steele dossier were created by him before the Oct. 19. report.

Feinstein’s analysis concludes that the criminal referral “fails to make a case” that Steele actually lied o the FBI.

“The criminal referral contains no new information. All the information in the criminal referral was already available to the FBI and the Department of Justice,” the analysis concludes. “In fact, the referral relies on publicly available information and information that was provided to Congress from DOJ and the FBI.”

In a statement accompanying the analysis, Feinstein said the Grassley-Graham referral has goals that include “undermining the FBI and Special Counsel [Robert] Mueller’s investigation, attacking Christopher Steele and deflecting attention from collusion and obstruction of justice investigations.

“Not a single revelation in the Steele dossier has been refuted. Unfortunately, the claims in the criminal referral rely on classified information, so it’s difficult to fully repudiate them here. However, as much as possible using unclassified information, the following points lay out the flaws in the criminal referral,” she said.

The Justice Department has not yet publicly commented on the Grassley-Graham referral.

quote:

After months of secret negotiations, a shadowy Russian bilked American spies out of $100,000 last year, promising to deliver stolen National Security Agency cyberweapons in a deal that he insisted would also include compromising material on President Trump, according to American and European intelligence officials.

The cash, delivered in a suitcase to a Berlin hotel room in September, was intended as the first installment of a $1 million payout, according to American officials, the Russian and communications reviewed by The New York Times. The theft of the secret hacking tools had been devastating to the N.S.A., and the agency was struggling to get a full inventory of what was missing.

Several American intelligence officials said they made clear that they did not want the Trump material from the Russian — who was suspected of having murky ties to Russian intelligence and to Eastern European cybercriminals. He claimed the information would link the president and his associates to Russia. But instead of providing the hacking tools, the Russian produced unverified and possibly fabricated information involving Mr. Trump and others, including bank records, emails and purported Russian intelligence data.

The United States intelligence officials said they cut off the deal because they were wary of being entangled in a Russian operation to create discord inside the American government. They were also fearful of political fallout in Washington if they were seen to be buying scurrilous information on the president.

The Central Intelligence Agency declined to comment on the negotiations with the Russian seller. The N.S.A., which produced the bulk of the hacking tools that the Americans sought to recover, said only that “all N.S.A. employees have a lifetime obligation to protect classified information.”

quote:

Fox removes 'Darker, Gayer, Different' Olympics column

Fox News has taken down a column on its website penned by executive editor John Moody that argued the U.S. Olympic Committee (USOC) wants to change the games' motto to “Darker, Gayer, Different."

The network said in a statement to The Hill that the "column does not reflect the views or values of FOX News."

In the column, which was published Thursday on Fox News's website, Moody wrote, “Unless it’s changed overnight, the motto of the Olympics, since 1894, has been ‘Faster, Higher, Stronger.’ It appears the U.S. Olympic Committee would like to change that to ‘Darker, Gayer, Different.’ If your goal is to win medals, that won’t work.”

Moody also scolded a USOC official for embracing the diversity of U.S. team, stating the official gave an “embarrassing laundry list of how many African-Americans, Asians and openly gay athletes” are on the American Olympic squad.

“No sport that we are aware of awards points — or medals — for skin color or sexual orientation,” Moody wrote.

Moody's perspective was sparked by a statement by Jason Thompson, the USOC’s director of diversity and inclusion, who told The Washington Post on Feb. 4 that while the 2018 U.S. team is more diverse than other rosters in the past, “We’re not quite where we want to be.”

“I think full-on inclusion has always been a priority of Team USA,” Thompson told the Post. “I think everybody’s always felt it should represent every American.”

Moody argued that Olympians should be chosen by merit and asked if the selections were based on "the best publicity" instead.

“While uncomfortable, the question probably needs to be asked: were our Olympians selected because they’re the best at what they do, or because they’re the best publicity for our current obsession with having one each from Column A, B and C?” Moody wrote.

“Sorry,” Moody wrote. “ ‘Faster, Higher, Stronger’ still works better than ‘we win because we’re different.’ ”

A Fox News spokesperson said the column was no longer on the site and does not reflect the views of the news outlet.

“John Moody’s column does not reflect the views or values of FOX News and has been removed," the spokesperson said in an email.

A person familiar with the network's internal structure said Moody's title is only a formal one and editors were "too deferential" to vet the story using the usual checks and balances.

“Moody’s title is a formality and he has not performed that function for several years. Editors were too deferential to him given his longevity at the network and as a result did not put the column through the proper vetting process, which is why it was taken down,” the source said.

Moody, 64, joined Fox News upon the network's launch in 1996. He left in 2009 to lead Newscore, a global wire service owned by then-Fox News parent company News Corp.

Moody returned to Fox News in 2012 after Newscore was absorbed by Fox News.

The Olympics kicked off in Pyeongchang, South Korea on Friday.

The U.S. team sent 243 athletes to South Korea, including 10 African-American and 10 Asian-American competitors. A solid majority of the roster is white.

The team also boasts the first African-American long-track speedskater to represent the U.S. in addition to its first African-American hockey player.

Adam Rippon, the first openly gay American to qualify for the Winter Olympics, is also on the squad as a figure skater.

twitter:

kylegriffin1 twitterde op zaterdag 10-02-2018 om 01:50:08 W.H. Counsel Don McGahn writes to Devin Nunes that Trump is unable to declassify the Democratic memo “at this time” (Letter via pool). https://t.co/DDRJtKz7s4 reageer retweet

quote:

Op zaterdag 10 februari 2018 01:58 schreef Recce het volgende:
Het Democratische memo wordt niet vrijgegeven door Trump.

twitter:

kylegriffin1 twitterde op zaterdag 10-02-2018 om 01:50:08 W.H. Counsel Don McGahn writes to Devin Nunes that Trump is unable to declassify the Democratic memo “at this time” (Letter via pool). https://t.co/DDRJtKz7s4 reageer retweet

quote:

Op zaterdag 10 februari 2018 02:10 schreef Nintex het volgende:

twitter:

AP twitterde op zaterdag 10-02-2018 om 02:04:57 BREAKING: Citing national security concerns, Trump says he won't declassify Democratic memo on Russia probe, asks for revisions. reageer retweet

Trump wil een paar revisies op advies van zijn staff.

quote:

White House Chief of Staff John F. Kelly on Friday morning instructed senior staff to communicate a version of events about the departure of staff secretary Rob Porter that contradicts the Trump administration’s previous accounts, according to two senior officials.

During a staff meeting, Kelly told those in attendance to say he took action to remove Porter within 40 minutes of learning that abuse allegations from two ex-wives were credible, according to the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because discussions in such meetings are supposed to be confidential.

“He told the staff he took immediate and direct action,” one of the officials said, adding that people after the meeting expressed disbelief with one another and felt his latest account was not true.

That version of events contradicts both the public record and accounts from numerous other White House officials in recent days as the Porter drama unfolded. Kelly — who first learned of the domestic violence allegations against Porter months ago — issued a glowing statement of support for Porter’s personal character after the allegations first surfaced publicly Tuesday and privately urged him to remain on the job until the next day when his resignation was announced.

At Friday’s meeting, Kelly also told subordinates to convey to other White House aides that he cares about domestic violence, according to the officials.

White House spokesmen declined to comment on Kelly’s message at the staff meeting.

quote:

Op zaterdag 10 februari 2018 02:57 schreef Kijkertje het volgende:
Kelly offers account of Porter exit that some White House aides consider untrue

[..]

Die gaat vast niet lang meer mee

twitter:

SenBlumenthal twitterde op zaterdag 10-02-2018 om 02:18:34 Trump’s refusal to release Democratic response to #NunesMemo makes a mockery of national security and common sense. https://t.co/6Gjx25tS8R reageer retweet

quote:

Op zaterdag 10 februari 2018 03:02 schreef ExtraWaskracht het volgende:

[..]

Je moet ook wel meewegen wie dan in de plaats zou kunnen en willen komen. Zolang dat niet duidelijk is zie ik niet een alternatief?

quote:

Op zaterdag 10 februari 2018 03:04 schreef Kijkertje het volgende:

[..]

Is er niet ergens nog een generaal?

quote:

Op zaterdag 10 februari 2018 03:19 schreef ExtraWaskracht het volgende:

[..]

Mattis. Maar dat zou een degradatie zijn tov zijn huidige positie.

quote:

Communications officer Mercedes Schlapp told some staffers to come to her with questions because Hope Hicks was “dealing with a lot” and “not able to perform the duties of communications director right now,” three people familiar with the meeting tell WSJ.

twitter:

Lawrence twitterde op zaterdag 10-02-2018 om 01:26:59 John Kelly's hometown paper says he is "a racist and incompetent staffer who has enabled a racist and incompetent president." https://t.co/ZKoKtnHuj7 via @BostonGlobe reageer retweet

quote:

Op zaterdag 10 februari 2018 05:04 schreef Kijkertje het volgende:

twitter:

Lawrence twitterde op zaterdag 10-02-2018 om 01:26:59 John Kelly's hometown paper says he is "a racist and incompetent staffer who has enabled a racist and incompetent president." https://t.co/ZKoKtnHuj7 via @BostonGlobe reageer retweet

quote:

Op zaterdag 10 februari 2018 05:08 schreef Szura het volgende:

[..]

Vernietigend

twitter:

TheBaxterBean twitterde op vrijdag 09-02-2018 om 19:15:37 JUST IN: Trump campaign chair in KY pleads guilty to sex trafficking of minors: 21 counts against 19 victims, to get 20 yrs in prison, “felony trafficking of a minor, felony inducing a minor to engage in sex, and a third count of giving alcohol to a minor”https://t.co/jlM9QpCzMS https://t.co/1scCWud33F reageer retweet

quote:

Op zaterdag 10 februari 2018 02:57 schreef Kijkertje het volgende:
Kelly offers account of Porter exit that some White House aides consider untrue

[..]

Die gaat vast niet lang meer mee

quote:

Op zaterdag 10 februari 2018 01:58 schreef Recce het volgende:
Het Democratische memo wordt niet vrijgegeven door Trump.

twitter:

kylegriffin1 twitterde op zaterdag 10-02-2018 om 01:50:08 W.H. Counsel Don McGahn writes to Devin Nunes that Trump is unable to declassify the Democratic memo “at this time” (Letter via pool). https://t.co/DDRJtKz7s4 reageer retweet

quote:

Op zaterdag 10 februari 2018 09:20 schreef Refragmental het volgende:

[..]

Typisch wel weer dat de democraten zulke smerige spelletjes spelen.
Expres geheime informatie in die memo stoppen waarvan ze weten dat het moet worden zwart gestreept, om vervolgens te roepen dat Trump niet transparant is.

Had niet anders verwacht, sterker nog, dit was al voorspeld ruim een week terug.

twitter:

justinamash twitterde op zaterdag 10-02-2018 om 02:30:37 Both the Republican and Democratic #FISA memos should be released. I’ve read both memos. Neither one endangers national security. The American people deserve the opportunity to read both memos. reageer retweet

twitter:

RepAdamSchiff twitterde op zaterdag 10-02-2018 om 02:46:09 After ignoring urging of FBI & DOJ not to release misleading Nunes memo because it omits material facts, @POTUS now expresses concerns over sharing precisely those facts with public and seeks to send it back to the same Majority that produced the flawed Nunes memo to begin with: reageer retweet

twitter:

NancyPelosi twitterde op zaterdag 10-02-2018 om 02:32:56 This move by @realDonaldTrump confirms what we have all known for weeks — that his decision to release the #NunesMemo was a blatantly political move made without concern for national security. The hypocrisy is on full display. What does the President have to hide? reageer retweet

twitter:

SenSchumer twitterde op zaterdag 10-02-2018 om 03:00:04 .@realDonaldTrump’s double standard when it comes to transparency is appalling. The rationale for releasing the #NunesMemo, transparency, vanishes when it could show information that’s harmful to him. Millions of Americans are asking one simple question: what is he hiding? reageer retweet

quote:

Op zaterdag 10 februari 2018 10:34 schreef westwoodblvd het volgende:
Toch wel triest om te zien hoe intelligence en een organisatie als de FBI nu tot politieke "football" zijn geworden. Schei toch een partij uit met al die memo's en laat ze gewoon hun werk doen.

Donald Trump Closer To Ending Russia Probe As Rachel Brand Quits DoJ | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC

quote:

Op zaterdag 10 februari 2018 10:34 schreef westwoodblvd het volgende:
Toch wel triest om te zien hoe intelligence en een organisatie als de FBI nu tot politieke "football" zijn geworden. Schei toch een partij uit met al die memo's en laat ze gewoon hun werk doen.

quote:

Op zaterdag 10 februari 2018 15:38 schreef Monolith het volgende:
In Kansas worden er kennelijk geen eisen gesteld aan kandidaten voor het gouverneurschap, dus doen er ook minderjarigen mee:
https://www.npr.org/secti(...)utm_content=20180209

quote:

Op zaterdag 10 februari 2018 15:39 schreef Boze_Appel het volgende:

[..]

Volgens mij worden die eisen in geen enkele staat gesteld.

quote:

Op zaterdag 10 februari 2018 15:44 schreef Monolith het volgende:

[..]

Wel degelijk:
https://en.m.wikipedia.or(...)in_the_United_States

quote:

Op zaterdag 10 februari 2018 02:26 schreef Kijkertje het volgende:

[..]

Ik denk dat hij gewoon alles met een zwarte viltstift wil bewerken.

quote:

Op zaterdag 10 februari 2018 15:38 schreef Monolith het volgende:
In Kansas worden er kennelijk geen eisen gesteld aan kandidaten voor het gouverneurschap, dus doen er ook minderjarigen mee:
https://www.npr.org/secti(...)utm_content=20180209

quote:

Op zaterdag 10 februari 2018 18:18 schreef Nintex het volgende:

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op zaterdag 10-02-2018 om 15:20:35 The Democrats sent a very political and long response memo which they knew, because of sources and methods (and more), would have to be heavily redacted, whereupon they would blame the White House for lack of transparency. Told them to re-do and send back in proper form! reageer retweet

quote:

Op zaterdag 10 februari 2018 17:42 schreef westwoodblvd het volgende:

[..]

De vorige gouverneur heeft Kansas ten gronde gericht met zijn beleid. Belastingverlaging na belastingverlaging met een dieprode begroting met als gevolg dat ze tot in hun nek in de schulden zitten en er eigenlijk geen publieke diensten meer over zijn. Veel slechter kan het dus niet worden

quote:

Op zaterdag 10 februari 2018 18:20 schreef OMG het volgende:
Wat is er precies aan?

quote:

Op zaterdag 10 februari 2018 21:13 schreef Ringo het volgende:

[..]

Mr.T doet een meerregelige uitspraak en Nindwerx krijgt daar een superhard stijfje van.
Maakt verder geen ene kankertyfusmoer uit waar het over gaat, Nindwerx krijgt er een stijfje van. Nou jullie weer!

quote:

Op zaterdag 10 februari 2018 15:44 schreef Monolith het volgende:

[..]

Wel degelijk:
https://en.m.wikipedia.or(...)in_the_United_States

quote:

Op zaterdag 10 februari 2018 23:32 schreef Glijdt_licht het volgende:

[..]

Eerder gouverneur zijn dan een biertje drinken

quote:

Op zaterdag 10 februari 2018 18:18 schreef Nintex het volgende:

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op zaterdag 10-02-2018 om 15:20:35 The Democrats sent a very political and long response memo which they knew, because of sources and methods (and more), would have to be heavily redacted, whereupon they would blame the White House for lack of transparency. Told them to re-do and send back in proper form! reageer retweet

twitter:

tedlieu twitterde op zaterdag 10-02-2018 om 18:08:02 I read the #DemocraticMemo and @realDonaldTrump is lying. The memo is:-Not political -Not long (many adults, and teens, routinely read more pages than this memo)-Not a revelation of sources & methods. But unlike the #NunesMemo, it does contain facts. #ReleaseTheDemMemo https://t.co/65ACXQ26wn reageer retweet

quote:

Op zaterdag 10 februari 2018 22:16 schreef MangoTree het volgende:
Gaat het goed met je?

quote:

Op zondag 11 februari 2018 00:34 schreef Devion het volgende:
Zoals voorspelt, Democratische memo wordt niet gereleased en vorig topic mensen niet serieus nemen .

Dit zat er al zo hard aan te komen. Democraten proberen een vies spelletje te spelen, maar dat gaan ze, zoals het afgelopen jaar, verliezen.

quote:

Op zondag 11 februari 2018 00:46 schreef ExtraWaskracht het volgende:

[..]

Hey, wat leuk, een nieuw gezicht!

Hoezo vind je dat de democrats een vies spelletje zouden spelen ondanks dat de republikeinen in het huis voor vrijgave van de memo hebben gestemd?

quote:

Op zondag 11 februari 2018 01:22 schreef westwoodblvd het volgende:

[..]

Dat heeft 'ie vast ergens op T_D gelezen.

quote:

Op zondag 11 februari 2018 01:30 schreef ExtraWaskracht het volgende:

[..]

Mogelijk. Ik vind dat we in dialoog moeten blijven, om het maar erg zwaar uit te drukken...

quote:

Op zondag 11 februari 2018 01:34 schreef westwoodblvd het volgende:

[..]

Met een normale conservatief valt prima te discussiëren. Maar met de tegenwoordige achterban van Trump is eigenlijk geen fatsoenlijk woord te wisselen. Niet op niveau in ieder geval, niet zonder dat je binnen een minuut in samenzweringen, alternative facts en whataboutisms vervalt. Maargoed, ben benieuwd.

quote:

Op zondag 11 februari 2018 01:40 schreef ExtraWaskracht het volgende:
Dat op voorhand afwijzen vind ik niet gezond in een democratie als de onze. Hell, ook met Nintex valt zo nu en dan gewoon te babbelen, ook al wijkt zijn mening flink af van de mijne EN is hij de helft van de tijd aan het trollen.

quote:

Op zondag 11 februari 2018 01:40 schreef ExtraWaskracht het volgende:

[..]

Dat op voorhand afwijzen vind ik niet gezond in een democratie als de onze. Hell, ook met Nintex valt zo nu en dan gewoon te babbelen, ook al wijkt zijn mening flink af van de mijne EN is hij de helft van de tijd aan het trollen.

quote:

"The Democrats sent a very political and long

quote:

Op zondag 11 februari 2018 15:47 schreef Monolith het volgende:
Als de media niet braaf als kritiekloze spreekbuis fungeert, dan richt je gewoon je eigen medium op:
https://www.politico.com/(...)ive-news-site-402097

quote:

Service Unavailable
The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to maintenance downtime or capacity problems. Please try again later.

Additionally, a 503 Service Unavailable error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.

quote:

[..]

The real danger that’s facing us is we’ve lost respect for truth and facts. People have discovered that it’s much easier to destroy reputations for credibility than it is to maintain them. It doesn’t matter how good your facts are, somebody else can spread the rumour that you’re fake news. We’re entering a period of epistemological murk and uncertainty that we’ve not experienced since the middle ages.

[..]

Sometimes, views can have terrifying consequences that might actually come true. I think what the postmodernists did was truly evil. They are responsible for the intellectual fad that made it respectable to be cynical about truth and facts. You’d have people going around saying: “Well, you’re part of that crowd who still believe in facts.”

[..]

twitter:

danieldennett twitterde op zaterdag 21-01-2017 om 19:27:59 I envy Republican senators. How often do people get a chance to be a hero without risking their lives? Be brave. Do the right thing. reageer retweet

Every Republican senator has an opportunity to grow a spine and stand up for truth and justice and the rule of law. My other hope is that if Trump has to choose between being president and being a billionaire, I think he may just resign.

[..]

I’ll tell you one thing that surprised me. There’s a higher order principle that I thought would be more important than has turned out to be the case. I’ll give you an example: why do advertisements cost so much at the Super Bowl? Answer: it’s not just that millions of people are watching but that millions of people, hundreds of millions of people, know that hundreds of millions of people are watching. And that gives it additional credibility. And the web isn’t like that. But when you’ve got Trump tweeting to millions of people at a time, they know that he’s tweeting to millions at a time. He’s getting one of the advantages of this credibility effect without the disadvantages. So the siloing effect is really very unnerving. This is one of the features of the new transparency that is most worrying. No sooner do we develop the hardware to give the globe a nervous system than we spoil it. We’re at great risk of going blind.

quote:

Op zondag 11 februari 2018 16:17 schreef Boze_Appel het volgende:

[..]


[..]



Maar hoe is dit anders dan infowars, breitbart of een willekeurige mongool met een blog?

twitter:

NatashaBertrand twitterde op zondag 11-02-2018 om 16:30:50 Sen. @RonWyden has asked @USTreasury for the financial records of Trump’s sale of a Palm Beach mansion to Russian oligarch Dmitry Rybolovlev in 2008. https://t.co/PT6tRzVQef reageer retweet

quote:

In a bombshell report published Friday, The New York Times found that American spies paid thousands of dollars to a Russian with shady connections in an effort to recover stolen cyberweapons. But instead of receiving the cyberweapons in return, they were handed dubious “kompromat,” or compromising material, on President Donald Trump.

[..]

US officials made it clear to the Russian intermediary that they were not interested in the kompromat he was offering on Trump. Moreover, the report said, upon closer examination of the materials the Russian provided, counterintelligence officials found that they did not bear the hallmarks of a Russian intelligence product.

Rather, they appeared to have been pulled from public news reports. US officials therefore feared they were part of a disinformation campaign aimed at stoking tensions over the Steele dossier, which the FBI is using as a “roadmap” while it investigates Russia’s interference in the 2016 election.

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op zaterdag 10-02-2018 om 16:20:05 According to the @nytimes, a Russian sold phony secrets on "Trump" to the U.S. Asking price was $10 million, brought down to $1 million to be paid over time. I hope people are now seeing & understanding what is going on here. It is all now starting to come out - DRAIN THE SWAMP! reageer retweet

quote:

Op zondag 11 februari 2018 20:55 schreef Nintex het volgende:
Lees maar wat die dame aan voorbeelden getweet heeft.

twitter:

CNN twitterde op zaterdag 10-02-2018 om 20:30:22 Kim Jong Un's sister is stealing the show at the Winter Olympics https://t.co/1EenqF8pi7 https://t.co/KULtJBtTEz reageer retweet

Of deze meneer:

twitter:

JamesHasson20 twitterde op zondag 11-02-2018 om 06:36:18 Here are stories fawning over North Korea at the Olympics from:-Wapo-Wall Street Journal-NYT-CNN-ABC News-NBC News-NPR-Time-The TelegraphOh and here are articles from a few weeks ago warning that NK would use the Olympics as a propaganda offensive. Good job, guys. 1/4 https://t.co/pJyk0OyfuW reageer retweet

quote:

But as North Korea's brutal dictator, Kim's brother has ruled with an iron fist since coming to power, operating Nazi-style prison camps, repressing political opposition and even executing senior officers and his own family members in an effort to consolidate power.

quote:

Op zondag 11 februari 2018 21:08 schreef Nintex het volgende:

[..]

Niemand die dat leest in deze tijd.

Ze lezen die clickbait headlines. Leuk koppie van de zus van Kim is het verhaal.

quote:

Op zondag 11 februari 2018 21:08 schreef Nintex het volgende:

[..]

Niemand die dat leest in deze tijd.

Ze lezen die clickbait headlines. Leuk koppie van de zus van Kim is het verhaal.

quote:

Russian cyberspies pursuing the secrets of military drones and other sensitive U.S. defense technology tricked key contract workers into exposing their email to theft, an Associated Press investigation has found.

What ultimately may have been stolen is uncertain, but the hackers clearly exploited a national vulnerability in cybersecurity: poorly protected email and barely any direct notification to victims.

The hackers known as Fancy Bear, who also intruded in the U.S. election, went after at least 87 people working on militarized drones, missiles, rockets, stealth fighter jets, cloud-computing platforms or other sensitive activities, the AP found.

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 02:03 schreef Recce het volgende:
Mooie chart voor als je even snel wilt zien hoe betrouwbaar een bron is:

[ afbeelding ]

quote:

Following the success of #ReleaseTheMemo, Russian-influenced Twitter accounts seek to rile up Trump supporters with new messages, analysts say.

After the success of the viral #ReleaseTheMemo campaign, Russian-influenced Twitter accounts are test-running other hashtags designed to stoke anger, particularly among supporters of President Donald Trump, against “deep state” forces, according to analysts at Hamilton 68, a website that tracks Russian-influenced Twitter accounts.

Last weekend, a host of new hashtags trended in the network of accounts monitored by Hamilton 68, including #fisagate, #obamadeepstate, #wethepeopledemandjustice, #thememorevealsthecoup and even #obamaslegacyisobamagate.

None of those have taken hold, but the flurry of new efforts indicated to Bret Schafer, an analyst for the Alliance for Security Democracy, which runs Hamilton 68, that the Russians would continue to push issues related to the “deep state.”

“There’s still a ton of activity,” Schafer said. “It does look like they’re looking for the next hashtag. … They’re clearly looking for the next step in this process.”

Some of the hashtags tied former President Barack Obama to the “deep state” resistance against Trump, a clear attempt to play on political divisions.

Schafer said he typically doesn’t put too much stock in a single trending hashtag, but when six or seven on the same theme bubble up, it usually indicates a broader strategy, he said.

These new efforts follow the striking success of #ReleaseTheMemo, which benefited from a particularly intense push, said Jonathon Morgan, the CEO of New Knowledge, the cybersecurity firm that built the Hamilton 68 dashboard.

quote:

President Trump is defending Rob Porter even though, privately, he says he’s guilty.

Behind closed doors: The president has told multiple people that he believes the accusations about Porter, and finds him “sick.”

Four sources who have spoken directly with Trump tell me his private comments about ex-aide Porter — whose two ex-wives accused of violent attacks — have been brutal.

quote:

Rep. Lou Barletta, a Great Republican from Pennsylvania who was one of my very earliest supporters, will make a FANTASTIC Senator. He is strong & smart, loves Pennsylvania & loves our Country! Voted for Tax Cuts, unlike Bob Casey, who listened to Tax Hikers Pelosi and Schumer!

quote:

Op zondag 11 februari 2018 01:38 schreef Nintex het volgende:

[..]

De strategie, alle ballen op Trump werkt niet. Dat zouden ze toch moeten weten. De GOP probeerde dat zelfde bij Obama en faalde. Pas toen Trump met een nieuw platform op de proppen kwam kwamen de kiezers terug.

Met een Trump-haat platform alleen winnen de Dems nooit van de GOP machine.

quote:

Op zaterdag 10 februari 2018 04:01 schreef Kijkertje het volgende:

President Trump's Best People | NYT Opinion

22 government officials ontslagen/ opgestapt

quote:

WASHINGTON—Heartbroken over the resignation of boyfriend Rob Porter from the Trump administration following reports that the now-former White House staff secretary had physically and emotionally abused his ex-wives, White House Communications Director Hope Hicks told reporters Friday she wished only to find one nice guy in the executive branch’s autocratic personality cult. “Every time I think I’ve found someone who shares my values in this legion of totalitarian sociopaths, they turn out to be nowhere near as good a guy as I first thought,” said Hicks, noting that the dating pool of single, oppressive pricks is fairly small, and connecting with a draconian tyrant who is also sweet and caring is increasingly difficult. “I just know the perfect, ruthless monster for me is out there somewhere in this fanatical hive mind of unfeeling narcissists—a selfish, vicious bastard who will sweep me off my feet. I just have to find the one for me.” As of press time, White House sources reported Hicks had been seen making eyes at a male colleague rumored to have good looks, kind eyes, and the appealing personality of a serial killer.

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 02:03 schreef Recce het volgende:
Mooie chart voor als je even snel wilt zien hoe betrouwbaar een bron is:

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 02:03 schreef Recce het volgende:
Mooie chart voor als je even snel wilt zien hoe betrouwbaar een bron is:

[ afbeelding ]

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 11:37 schreef brokjespoes het volgende:

[..]

"Fair & Balanced" FoxNews op de grens van "Unfair" en "Nonsense".

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 12:16 schreef klappernootopreis het volgende:

[..]

Toch vraag ik me af wie deze grafiek heeft gemaakt..

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 12:16 schreef klappernootopreis het volgende:
Toch vraag ik me af wie deze grafiek heeft gemaakt..

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 12:16 schreef klappernootopreis het volgende:

[..]

Toch vraag ik me af wie deze grafiek heeft gemaakt..

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 12:36 schreef Recce het volgende:

[..]

Dat is natuurlijk een goede vraag. De grafiek komt van deze site: http://www.allgeneralizationsarefalse.com/ Daar kun je bij About en Methodology Posts lezen hoe de grafiek tot stand is gekomen. De maakster is een advocate, heeft een bachelor Engelse taal en is de afgelopen twee jaar het medialandschap aan het bestuderen.

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 12:49 schreef klappernootopreis het volgende:

[..]

En wat is haar politieke achtergrond, en wie heeft haar opdracht gegeven om dit te doen?

quote:

Op zondag 11 februari 2018 08:45 schreef Ludachrist het volgende:

[..]

Waarom zou je met een figuur als Nintex in discussie moeten gaan omdat het een democratie is?

Ik bedoel, hij heeft vast een mening hoor, maar als hij die alleen kan uiten met non-argumenten, getroll en zwakzinnige one-liners hoef je daar echt niet serieus op in te gaan omdat democratie. Als hij serieus zou willen discussiëren mag hij ook zelf de moeite nemen om serieus een discussie aan te gaan.

quote:

But I know that the medium of a well-written article just doesn’t reach people who don’t read long things. In this post, I refer to such people as “non-readers” or “infrequent readers.” I am fully aware that the website MediaBiasFactCheck, and the organization Pew Research, and media research departments at many universities have large sets of empirical data available to review, and that those sources are more reputable than *just me*. But non/infrequent readers don’t read those sources. What do they read? Memes, which are often just two juxtaposed pictures with a pithy, terrible, one-sentence argument placed on top in large white letters. Tweets in which arguments are limited to 140 characters. They also prefer to watch videos, like YouTube “documentaries,” no matter how deceptively edited or spun.

Memes and tweets and YouTube videos spread quickly. They don’t take any effort to read, and people are convinced by them. They base their viewpoints upon them IN PLACE of basing their opinions upon long written pieces. To the extent that infrequent readers read, they prefer short articles that confirm their biases. Because they read very little, their comprehension skills and ability to distinguish good writing from bad writing is low. This is true for infrequent readers across the political spectrum. All of this is extremely disturbing to me.

Many non/infrequent-readers prefer easily digestible, visual information. I wanted to take the landscape of news sources that I was highly familiar with and put it into an easily digestible, visual format. I wanted it to be easily shareable, and more substantive than a meme, but less substantive than an article. I cite the fact that it has been shared over 20,000 times on Facebook (that I know of) and viewed 3 million times on Imgur as evidence that I accomplished the goal of it being shareable. In contrast, maybe one-one millionth the amount of people will read this boring-ass article about my methodology behind it.

Many non/infrequent readers are quite bad at distinguishing between decent news sources and terrible news sources. I wanted to make this chart in the hopes that if non/infrequent readers saw it, they could use it to avoid trash. For those of you who can discern between the partisan leanings of The Economist and the Wall Street Journal, I have to say this chart was not primarily made for your benefit. You are already good at reading and distinguishing news sources.

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op maandag 12-02-2018 om 13:46:56 This will be a big week for Infrastructure. After so stupidly spending $7 trillion in the Middle East, it is now time to start investing in OUR Country! reageer retweet

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 13:49 schreef Adrie072 het volgende:

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op maandag 12-02-2018 om 13:46:56 This will be a big week for Infrastructure. After so stupidly spending $7 trillion in the Middle East, it is now time to start investing in OUR Country! reageer retweet

En toch kan ik het wel waarderen, dat ie dit zo openlijk zegt. Hoe ie dat gaat invullen is een andere zaak...

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 13:49 schreef Adrie072 het volgende:

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op maandag 12-02-2018 om 13:46:56 This will be a big week for Infrastructure. After so stupidly spending $7 trillion in the Middle East, it is now time to start investing in OUR Country! reageer retweet

En toch kan ik het wel waarderen, dat ie dit zo openlijk zegt. Hoe ie dat gaat invullen is een andere zaak...

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 13:49 schreef Adrie072 het volgende:

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op maandag 12-02-2018 om 13:46:56 This will be a big week for Infrastructure. After so stupidly spending $7 trillion in the Middle East, it is now time to start investing in OUR Country! reageer retweet

En toch kan ik het wel waarderen, dat ie dit zo openlijk zegt. Hoe ie dat gaat invullen is een andere zaak...

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 13:49 schreef Adrie072 het volgende:

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op maandag 12-02-2018 om 13:46:56 This will be a big week for Infrastructure. After so stupidly spending $7 trillion in the Middle East, it is now time to start investing in OUR Country! reageer retweet

En toch kan ik het wel waarderen, dat ie dit zo openlijk zegt. Hoe ie dat gaat invullen is een andere zaak...

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op zaterdag 22-07-2017 om 14:17:54 The Republican Senators must step up to the plate and, after 7 years, vote to Repeal and Replace. Next, Tax Reform and Infrastructure. WIN! reageer retweet

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op maandag 18-12-2017 om 19:41:05 The train accident that just occurred in DuPont, WA shows more than ever why our soon to be submitted infrastructure plan must be approved quickly. Seven trillion dollars spent in the Middle East while our roads, bridges, tunnels, railways (and more) crumble! Not for long! reageer retweet

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op vrijdag 22-12-2017 om 14:05:06 At some point, and for the good of the country, I predict we will start working with the Democrats in a Bipartisan fashion. Infrastructure would be a perfect place to start. After having foolishly spent $7 trillion in the Middle East, it is time to start rebuilding our country! reageer retweet

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op maandag 12-02-2018 om 13:46:56 This will be a big week for Infrastructure. After so stupidly spending $7 trillion in the Middle East, it is now time to start investing in OUR Country! reageer retweet

quote:

Trump finally launching $1.5T sales pitch
https://www.politico.com/(...)lion-403248?lo=ap_a1

The White House is rolling out President Donald Trump’s long-awaited infrastructure plan Monday, swinging for the fences with a $1.5 trillion initiative that is light on new federal dollars — but could inspire a wave of toll roads, ease decades-old regulations and permanently change cities’ and states’ expectations for assistance from Washington.

[...]

Trump is proposing to provide $200 billion for his plan over the next 10 years — “not a large amount,” he has conceded — paid for by unspecified cuts elsewhere in the budget proposal that the White House also plans to release Monday. That spending is meant to draw an additional $1.3 trillion or more in investments from cities, states, private investors and other sources.

[...]

However, many infrastructure advocates believe that the real fix that’s needed is a permanent new revenue stream, something Trump’s plan doesn’t address.

Oregon Rep. Peter DeFazio, the top Democrat on the House Transportation Committee, said in an address Friday that Trump's plan would "slash the federal commitment to a national infrastructure network."

"This is not a real infrastructure plan — it’s simply another scam, an attempt by this administration to privatize critical government functions, and create windfalls for their buddies on Wall Street," DeFazio said. "This fake proposal will not address the serious infrastructure needs facing this country, so our potholed roads will get worse, our bridges and transit systems will become more dangerous, and our tolls will become higher."

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 15:38 schreef brokjespoes het volgende:
Ergens is het erg dat je Trump op die zetel gewoon herként.

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op maandag 12-02-2018 om 13:54:32 Thank you to Sue Kruczek, who lost her wonderful and talented son Nick to the Opioid scourge, for your kind words while on @foxandfriends. We are fighting this terrible epidemic hard - Nick will not have died in vain! reageer retweet

quote:

More than three months after President Trump declared the nation's opioid crisis a public health emergency, activists and health care providers say they're still waiting for some other action.

The Trump administration quietly renewed the declaration recently. But it has given no signs it's developing a comprehensive strategy to address an epidemic that claims more than 115 lives every day. The president now says that to combat opioids, he's focused on enforcement, not treatment.

Trump spent just over a minute of his 80-minute State of the Union address talking about opioids. In a speech this week in Cincinnati, he had a few more comments. The opioid epidemic, he said, "has never been worse. People form blue ribbon committees. They do everything they can. And frankly, I have a different take on it. My take is you have to get really, really tough, really mean with the drug pushers and the drug dealers."

The president's mention of "blue ribbon committees" sounds like a slam on one he convened last year, chaired by former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie — the President's Commission on Combating Drug Addiction and the Opioid Crisis. The commission issued more than 50 recommendations. The administration has so far followed up on just a few of those recommendations.

SPOILER

Om spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 17:33 schreef Kijkertje het volgende:

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op maandag 12-02-2018 om 13:54:32 Thank you to Sue Kruczek, who lost her wonderful and talented son Nick to the Opioid scourge, for your kind words while on @foxandfriends. We are fighting this terrible epidemic hard - Nick will not have died in vain! reageer retweet

Nog meer gebakken lucht

Trump Says He Will Focus On Opioid Law Enforcement, Not Treatment

[..]

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 15:25 schreef Ulx het volgende:
[ afbeelding ]

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 17:43 schreef Pietverdriet het volgende:

[..]

Ik snap de grap niet

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 17:40 schreef Tchock het volgende:

[..]

Trump gaat gewoon weer op de klassieke Republikeinse tour van de War on Drugs. Harder aanpakken, geen verslaafden helpen, de drugshandel ondergronds drijven en dan over een aantal jaar concluderen dat dat - nog steeds - niet werkt.

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 18:00 schreef Boze_Appel het volgende:

[..]

Trump again targets drug policy office, proposing 95 percent budget cut

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 18:00 schreef Boze_Appel het volgende:

[..]

Trump again targets drug policy office, proposing 95 percent budget cut

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 18:01 schreef Tchock het volgende:

[..]

Heb je ook iets te melden over deze link?

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 18:03 schreef Boze_Appel het volgende:

[..]

Dat het hele opiod-gebeuren hem geen reet kan schelen als hij 95% van het budget van de mensen die het moeten gaan doen weghaalt. Die tweet over Sue Kruczek is dus zo hypocriet als het maar zijn kan. Je gaat het niet hard aanpakken door 95% van het budget weg te halen.

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 17:43 schreef Pietverdriet het volgende:

[..]

Ik snap de grap niet

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 15:04 schreef xpompompomx het volgende:

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op maandag 12-02-2018 om 13:46:56 This will be a big week for Infrastructure. After so stupidly spending $7 trillion in the Middle East, it is now time to start investing in OUR Country! reageer retweet

Aldus de man die het "verslaan van IS" belangrijker vond dan de infrastructuur in eigen land.

quote:

The president has made this claim (or one like it) several times — on the campaign trail, in interviews and in speeches. According to our fact checkers, Trump has repeated this number at least 21 times.

But . . . it is flat wrong.

Though estimates vary, experts say the United States spent about $1.8 trillion on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan between 2001 and 2017. (Of course, Afghanistan is not actually in the Middle East, but Trump seems to be including that country in his calculation.)

More comprehensive assessments, which look at direct and indirect expenditures from the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan Pakistan and Syria, estimate the cost at about $3.6 trillion from 2001 to 2016, according to a Brown University study. That figure includes costs tied to veterans' care and disability benefits, along with “war-related additions” to the Department of Homeland Security, the Pentagon and the State Department.

As our fact checkers report, the number Trump is citing seems to come from another Brown University report, one that estimates future spending all the way out to 2050. His figure also seems to include, they write, matters such as “interest on the debt and veterans' care for the next three decades.” (A working paper from professors at Harvard Kennedy School estimated the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan would ultimately cost taxpayers $4 trillion to $6 trillion.)

Here is another thing about the president's tweet: Despite what he said on the campaign trail, Trump has expanded the war effort in Afghanistan. He approved a troop surge there, a decision that added billions to the overall cost of the war in that country. As my colleague Steven Mufson reported, Trump's “decision to send more troops will add billions of dollars a year to the already-towering war costs, which have topped $1 trillion in Afghanistan alone over the past 16 years. And the government will still be paying for war veterans' health-care costs for at least another half-century.”

Mufson wrote that U.S. spending in Afghanistan will rise to about $840.7 billion if the president's fiscal 2018 budget is approved. (That estimate comes courtesy of Anthony Cordesman, an expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.)

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 19:30 schreef westwoodblvd het volgende:
Hoe dan ook doodzonde van het geld geweest. Zeker Irak. Thanks W!

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 19:32 schreef Ulx het volgende:
Irak had gekund. Maar het moest goedkoop. En dat was duurkoop.

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 19:37 schreef Ulx het volgende:
Gelukkig heeft Trump Jr niks met de politiek te maken. Maar toch...

Afrekening in het criminele milieu? Druk van de Russen?

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 19:38 schreef westwoodblvd het volgende:

[..]

Amerika had niks te zoeken in Irak. Was een hobbyproject van Cheney.

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 19:38 schreef Tchock het volgende:

[..]

Wat

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 19:39 schreef Ulx het volgende:

[..]

Dat maakt niks uit. Het had gekund. Maar het moest goedkoop.

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 19:40 schreef Ulx het volgende:

[..]

Als zijn vrouw een poederbrief krijgt die voor hem bedoeld was?

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 19:43 schreef Tchock het volgende:

[..]

Trump Jr zat in het campagneteam van Trump en is overduidelijk nog steeds adviseur voor zijn vader, al dan niet openlijk. Bovendien verdedigt hij met hand en tand het beleid van de minst geliefde president in decennia op elke plek waar ze hem maar aan het woord laten.

Nee, heeft vast niets met politiek te maken.

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 19:46 schreef Ulx het volgende:

[..]

Welnee. Hij regelt de zakelijke dingen voor Sr omdat Sr er uiteraard niets mee te maken heeft. Jahaaa. Echt waar.

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 19:46 schreef Ulx het volgende:

[..]

Welnee. Hij regelt de zakelijke dingen voor Sr omdat Sr er uiteraard niets mee te maken heeft. Jahaaa. Echt waar.

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 19:46 schreef Tchock het volgende:

[..]

Hilarisch.

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 19:48 schreef Ulx het volgende:
Maar goed. Ik ben benieuwd wat de reden is. Het lijkt me te vroeg voor een campagnetrucje om sympathie mee te vergaren.

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 19:48 schreef Ulx het volgende:

[..]

Het is wat ze zelf beweren.

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 19:49 schreef Tchock het volgende:

[..]

Waarschijnlijk van een of andere extremist die met geweld en dreiging een politieke tegenstander probeert het zwijgen op te leggen.

Zeg maar, wat poederbrieven altijd als reden hebben.

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 19:51 schreef Ulx het volgende:
Dat eerste.

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 20:01 schreef Boze_Appel het volgende:
Voor diegenen die het gemist hebben: het budget

quote:

President Donald Trump proposed a $4.4 trillion federal budget on Monday for fiscal 2019, a plan Congress is expected to all but ignore that would slash entitlements and other domestic programs in favor of higher spending on the military and immigration enforcement.

Trump again asked lawmakers for drastic reductions in environmental, research and diplomatic programs he’s long derided as wasteful: a 27 percent cut to the State Department; 34 percent to the Environmental Protection Agency; cost-cutting overhauls to Medicare and other social safety-net programs. That money would be partially diverted toward building a wall on the Mexican border and boosting defense spending.

The Pentagon would see an $80 billion increase in its budget, up 13 percent. Entitlement programs would see a $1.7 trillion cut over a decade, including $237 billion from Medicare.

The budget shows the 2019 deficit nearly doubling from projections last year, to $984 billion. The red ink would total $7.1 trillion over the next decade, the national debt would rise to nearly $30 trillion, and the budget would not balance. That assumes Congress adopts all Trump’s proposals, including spending cuts, and the economy doesn’t suffer a downturn for at least a decade.

SPOILER

Om spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.

Any president’s budget proposal is customarily dismissed by Congress -- which controls the government’s purse strings, under the Constitution -- as a dead-on-arrival wish list. That’s especially true with this year’s document. Just last week, Congress passed its own bipartisan two-year budget agreement that increased caps for both domestic and defense spending.

The White House scrambled over the weekend to re-write its proposal to account for the deal, only increasing the likelihood that legislators dismiss Trump’s plan. The agreement boosts spending caps by $300 billion and provides $90 billion in emergency disaster aid.

SPOILER

Om spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.

Trump Proposes $4.4 Trillion Budget

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 20:20 schreef Kijkertje het volgende:

[..]

Inside Trump's $4.4 Trillion Budget: More Defense and Red Ink

[..]

Trump Proposes $4.4 Trillion Budget

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 20:38 schreef Ulx het volgende:
Ach. Het is maar een verlanglijstje. Het is niet echt verrassend te noemen. Trump lijkt gewoon te denken dat hij het land als bedrijf kan runnen. Inclusief faillissement en dan weglopen.
De deficit hawks accepteren zoiets nooit.

quote:

Op maandag 12 februari 2018 20:46 schreef Ulx het volgende:
O ja. Gewoon op gezondheidszorg en ouderen en zo.