Russia vs Ukraine #75 opzettelijk of niet

quote:

"According to my information, the F-16 of the Ukrainian pilot Alexei "Moonfish" Mes was shot down by the Patriot anti-aircraft missile system due to discoordination between units. The reports noted that he "failed to manage." The event took place during one of the most powerful air attacks of the Russians on August 26. War is war, such episodes are possible. But the culture of lies in the Command of the Air Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, as well as in other senior military staffs, leads to the fact that the system of managing military decisions does not improve on the basis of truthful, consistently collected analytics, but deteriorates and even collapses, as it happens in Pokrovsky direction. And none of the generals has been punished. General Oleschuk remains in office,"

quote:

Globalists Are Trying To Escalate The Ukraine War Into WWIII Before The US Election
The purpose of NATO involvement in the Ukraine War has, to me, always appeared obvious. Ukraine has nothing to do with the interests of the western public, nothing to do with the security of Europe and nothing to do with the economic advancement of the United States. Yet, NATO and the globalists have been politically interfering in the region since at least 2014 and preparing the ground for an eventual war with Russia.

To be clear, I don’t favor Russia any more than I favor Ukraine. The Kremlin has long had its own ties to the globalists, as I have outlined in numerous articles. How deep those ties go is up for debate – Maybe the honeymoon is over and Russia is truly done trying to get a seat at the globalist table. What I do know is that western elites want a world war and they have done everything in their power to start one.

Look at it this way: What if you were to make a list of all the covert and overt NATO operations in Ukraine and then flipped script? What if Russia was pursuing all the same agendas of destabilization, control and arms proliferation in Mexico (as the Soviets did in Cuba in the 1960s)? If the US invaded Mexico preemptively it would be completely understandable.

Whether or not Putin is acting in the best interests of Russia doesn’t really matter. The war was inevitable anyway because NATO made sure it was impossible to avoid. But what purpose does such a proxy war serve? Well, it doesn’t serve much purpose at all…unless the goal is to instigate a wider world war between the East and the West. In that scenario the globalists benefit greatly.

They get a scapegoat for the economic collapse they’ve already set in motion. They multiply the global fear factor and make the public desperate for the political elites to step in and solve all their problems. And, they can get rid of their domestic enemies (conservatives and patriots) by accusing them of “working with Russia” to undermine the war effort if they dare to rebel against unconstitutional mandates.

Beyond that, they also get an opportunity to send young men (who might rebel) off to the meat grinder in Ukraine so that there’s no new generation of freedom fighters to deal with. World War III is a win-win-win for the Davos crowd, as long as it doesn’t go full-on nuclear holocaust and wipe out their carefully crafted surveillance states.

But how do they turn the proxy war into a world war without looking like the bad guys? That’s the trick, isn’t it?

The proxy (in this case, Ukraine) would have to take actions that provoke Russia into an explosive outburst. Russia would have to utilize tactics or weaponry that puts a vast number of civilians at risk, requiring greater NATO involvement and perhaps even UN intervention. They need Russia to level a major city containing hundreds of thousands of civilians. They need Russia to drop MOABs or nukes. They need a dramatic war crime; otherwise, the western public is not going to support boots on the ground or agree to a military draft.

quote:

Op maandag 2 september 2024 09:10 schreef UncleScorp het volgende:

[..]
Idd benieuwd welke trucs ze nog zullen proberen uithalen om tot de ultieme escalatie te geraken.
Kursk heeft het niet geflikt.
Volgende is (door het westen bediende) lange afstandsraketten diep in Rusland.
Gaat ook niet lukken.
En dan ... ?

quote:

Op maandag 2 september 2024 09:47 schreef UncleScorp het volgende:

[..]
De grens tussen proxy/rechtstreeks begint meer en meer te vervagen.

quote:

Op maandag 2 september 2024 09:19 schreef UncleScorp het volgende:
Blijkbaar weer heisa over een raket op een shopping center in Kharkov ?
Hier maken ze ntl geen melding van een recente video op Telegram .
In deze video wordt aangeklaagd dat de zogenaamde 46A4638 Unit van de 3rd Assault Brigade het shopping center Target, Akademika Pavlova Street 120 in Kharkov overgenomen hadden. Het werd geclaimed als een military facility en niemand kreeg nog toegang.
Volgende bezoek was een Iskander ...

De persoon in die video zal het mogen uitleggen ...

quote:

Op maandag 2 september 2024 14:32 schreef UncleScorp het volgende:
Eigenlijk moet Zelenksy niet zoeken naar de ultieme escalatie...
[..]

quote:

Op maandag 2 september 2024 16:04 schreef UncleScorp het volgende:

[..]
Nou dan moet je mss es de docu Europe-the Last Battle bekijken. Wel heftig (!) en lang, maar bevat veel doordenkertjes.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/QtLvxZ9d0yEY/

quote:

Op maandag 2 september 2024 16:15 schreef epicbeardman het volgende:
[ x ]