BNW Brave New World
Samenzwering, verborgen agenda's en geheime geschiedenis. De zoektocht naar de wereld die achter de façade van alledag ligt.
[modbreak]Dit topic gaat over de verkiezingen en de vermeende fraude en het complot daaromheen, niet over algemeen politiek beleid." Dank u. En speel eens op de bal en niet op de man"[/modbreak].
Het begon zo, heel erg superspannend:
Toen ging het opeens iets slechter voor Trump:
Toen zei Trump dit:
En het was goed.
Daarop heeft Trump mevrouw Powell ingeschakeld om The Kraken los te laten, en toen was het ineens zo:
Maar The Kraken bleek toch niet zoveel invloed te hebben.
En uiteindelijk is het toch gewoon weer dit geworden:
Overigens is de uiteindelijke stand geworden:
306 Biden - 232 Trump
Het begon zo, heel erg superspannend:
Toen ging het opeens iets slechter voor Trump:
Toen zei Trump dit:
En het was goed.
Daarop heeft Trump mevrouw Powell ingeschakeld om The Kraken los te laten, en toen was het ineens zo:
Maar The Kraken bleek toch niet zoveel invloed te hebben.
En uiteindelijk is het toch gewoon weer dit geworden:
Overigens is de uiteindelijke stand geworden:
306 Biden - 232 Trump
“The fundamental cause of the trouble in the modern world today is that the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.”— Bertrand Russell
“The fundamental cause of the trouble in the modern world today is that the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.”— Bertrand Russell
“The fundamental cause of the trouble in the modern world today is that the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.”— Bertrand Russell
Niet voor Trump-fans als Trump maar blijft beweren dar er fraude was.quote:Op woensdag 27 oktober 2021 20:10 schreef V. het volgende:
Magoed, de enige logische conclusie is: Biden is de rechtmatig gekozen president van de VS.
Er is geen geloofwaardig bewijs voor het tegendeel.
Het enige dat Trumpisten rest is querulantie.
Duidelijk. Opgelost.
Nieuwe poging:
quote:In your editorial “The Election for Pennsylvania’s High Court” (Oct. 25), you state the fact that a court wrongly said mail-in ballots could be counted after Election Day. “This didn’t matter,” you add, “because Mr. Biden won the state by 80,555, but the country is lucky the election wasn’t closer. If the election had hung on a few thousand Pennsylvanians, the next President might have been picked by the U.S. Supreme Court.”
Well actually, the election was rigged, which you, unfortunately, still haven’t figured out. Here are just a few examples of how determinative the voter fraud in Pennsylvania was:
• 71,893 mail-in ballots were returned after Nov. 3, 2020, at 8 p.m., according to Audit the Vote PA. None of these should have been counted according to the U.S. Constitution and the state Legislature, which didn’t approve this change.
• 10,515 mail-in votes from people who do not exist on the Pennsylvania voter rolls at all.
• 120,000 excess voters are not yet accounted for by the Pennsylvania Department of State—far more votes than voters!
• From 2016 to 2020, during my term as president, Republicans out-registered Democrats 21 to 1. This translated to a 659,145-vote lead at 12:38 a.m. on election night, with “Trump” up a full 15 points.
• Hundreds of thousands of votes were unlawfully counted in secret, in defiance of a court order, while Republican poll watchers were thrown out of buildings where voting took place.
• 39,771 people who registered to vote after the Oct. 19, 2020, deadline, still voted in the 2020 election—simply not allowed.
Highly respected Audit the Vote PA found numerous data integrity problems the Pennsylvania Statewide Uniform Registry of Electors (SURE) system, including:
• 305,874 voters were removed from the rolls after the election on Nov. 3rd.
• 51,792 voters with inactive voter registrations at the end of October 2020 nevertheless voted.
• 57,000 duplicate registrations.
• 55,823 voters who were backfilled into the SURE system.
• 58,261 first-time voters 70 years and older.
• 39,911 people who were added to voter rolls while under 17 years of age.
• 17,000 mail-in ballots sent to addresses outside of Pennsylvania.
• Another analysis of Montgomery County, Pa., found 98% of the eligible voting population in the county was already registered to vote—not possible.
• A canvass of Montgomery County has identified 78,000 phantom voters, with roughly 30% of respondents unaware that there are people registered and voting from their address.
• One nursing home in Lancaster County had 690 registrations and an extremely high turnout rate of 85% in 2020, while nursing homes were closed due to Covid. One of these residents said she had not voted in the past 3 years, but had a mail-in ballot cast in her name.
• 25,000 ballots were requested from nursing homes at the exact same time.
• Numerous reports and sworn affidavits attested to poll watcher intimidation and harassment, many by brute force.
• Attorney General Bill Barr ordered U.S. Attorney Bill McSwain to stand down and not investigate election irregularities.
• Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook poured over $17 million to interfere in the Pennsylvania election, including $5.5 million on “ballot processing equipment” in Philadelphia and $552,000 for drop boxes where the voting pattern was not possible.
And so much more! This is why Democrats and the Fake News Media do not want a full forensic audit in Pennsylvania. In reality, 80,555 ballots are nothing when there is this much corruption or voter irregularities.
Donald J. Trump
Palm Beach, Fla.
“The fundamental cause of the trouble in the modern world today is that the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.”— Bertrand Russell
Beweert ie nu dat als ik alles op tel niemand rechtmatig op Biden heeft gestemdquote:Op woensdag 27 oktober 2021 21:45 schreef Kijkertje het volgende:
[..]
Niet voor Trump-fans als Trump maar blijft beweren dar er fraude was.
Nieuwe poging:
[ twitter ]
[..]
althans daar lijkt het wel op.
Er staat nog een vraag voor u open!!
De man is knetterrrrrgek, gevaarlijk en crimineel.
Letterlijk het type dat je in Arkham Asylum zou proppen, als dat echt bestond.
Letterlijk het type dat je in Arkham Asylum zou proppen, als dat echt bestond.
Ja inderdaad, V. ja.
Nja de Groot schalige fraude VS president verkiezingen 2020 en Arkham asylum zijn beide fictief.quote:
De man is knetterrrrrgek, gevaarlijk en crimineel.
Letterlijk het type dat je in Arkham Asylum zou proppen, als dat echt bestond.
Nja ik zou m meer zien als een Caligula.
Er staat nog een vraag voor u open!!
De extreme sexuele uitspattingen passen dan weer niet bij de rechts conservatieven.quote:
Nja ik zou m meer zien als een Caligula.
In Virginia weten ze bij Republikeinen ook nu al weer dat de Democraten gaan frauderen bij de gouverneursverkiezing!
Same old, same old ...
[ Bericht 1% gewijzigd door Kijkertje op 28-10-2021 06:11:17 ]
Same old, same old ...
[ Bericht 1% gewijzigd door Kijkertje op 28-10-2021 06:11:17 ]
“The fundamental cause of the trouble in the modern world today is that the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.”— Bertrand Russell
Dus ze weet dat er wordt gefraudeerd, maar ze doet er niks aan, wat is dat voor stompzinnig gedoe?
"Bleach is healthy. It's mostly water. And we are mostly water. Therefore, we are bleach."
Carol Who 
In Wisconsin wordt de 'election review' al net zo professioneel aangepakt als de 'audit' in Arizona.
Ze hebben Carol ingehuurd
[ Bericht 1% gewijzigd door Kijkertje op 28-10-2021 06:20:15 ]
In Wisconsin wordt de 'election review' al net zo professioneel aangepakt als de 'audit' in Arizona.
Ze hebben Carol ingehuurd
quote:Assembly Republicans have hired someone named Carol to help answer their questions about the 2020 election.
Just don’t ask Carol or her bosses what her last name is.
"No comment," she said Wednesday before hanging up on a reporter.
The hiring of Carol is the latest example of the opacity of a review of the 2020 election being overseen by former state Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman at a cost to taxpayers of $676,000.
Wisconsinites picked Joe Biden over Donald Trump by a margin of nearly 21,000 votes. Recounts and court rulings upheld those results and a legislative audit released last week did not identify any widespread fraud.
Republicans who control the Assembly and Gableman want further investigation and they’ve brought on Carol to help them.
The woman, who signs her emails “Carol M.,” has been contacting attorneys for election officials recently to discuss subpoenas Gableman has issued. She has not told them whether she is a lawyer, an administrative assistant or holds some other post, the attorneys said.
[..]
[ Bericht 1% gewijzigd door Kijkertje op 28-10-2021 06:20:15 ]
“The fundamental cause of the trouble in the modern world today is that the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.”— Bertrand Russell
quote:Op woensdag 27 oktober 2021 21:02 schreef Kijkertje het volgende:
Intussen volgt Aaron Rupar Garland's hearing in het Congres:
Teveel om allemaal te posten
[ twitter ]
En ja hoor!
“The fundamental cause of the trouble in the modern world today is that the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.”— Bertrand Russell
Arizona Attorney General Opens ‘Formal Investigation’ Into 2020 Election: Will ‘Hold People Accountable For Breaking The Law’
quote:Arizona Senate President Karen Fann has announced that the state’s Attorney General Mark Brnovich has opened up a ‘formal investigation ‘into Maricopa County election officials’ misconduct due to the revelations in Arizona’s independent election audit.
Karen Fann was on ‘The Conservative Circus’ with James T. Harris to discuss the Arizona audit and revealed Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich’s investigation. She also discussed coming changes to election law in Arizona. The audio segment can be heard below.
“Some of that report is inconclusive and so we will have supplemental reports coming,” Fann said. “And the reason why it is inconclusive is because Maricopa County did not turn over the routers, did not over the splunk logs. They have now admitted before Congress that they deleted files the day before everything was supposed to be turned in and over to us.”
“They admitted in Congress that, actually, they said that they had to delete them to make room for an upcoming election,” she continued. “However, congressmen then pointed out that there were still elections on the server from previous – before 2020, and they couldn’t explain why that was.”
“When they said, ‘don’t worry, the deleted files are on a backup archive,’ and Congressman Biggs said ‘did you turn that over to the auditors in the Senate’? they said, ‘well, no, they didn’t subpoena our backup archives.”
“So, this is the stuff we have been putting up from day one,” Fann said, addng “our audit was pretty darn good, and we’re not done yet.”
“I mean, you don’t hold information from the voters and the constituents and just think you are going to get away with it,” Fann continued. “Not going to happen.”
Fann then discussed that it is now the job of the state’s Attorney General to act on the findings in the audit, as well as Maricopa County’s potentially unlawful obstruction of the investigation. She also pointed to election laws that were broken by Maricopa County in the 2020 election.
“We, as a legislative body, right?” she continued. “Our job is policy. Our job is to make laws, make sure they’re working, and change or update laws as necessary. It is the Attorney General’s office’s to enforce those laws. So, we are on a dual path now. We have turned everything – we have, so far, over to the Attorney General.
“He has opened up a formal investigation,’ Fann said of the Attorney General. “He is seeking not only all the information we have, but he is digging further into information that other people have gathered, even outside of the audit. So – that’s his job. He is going to hold people accountable.”
In early October, a U.S. House Committee for Oversight and Reform hearing on the Arizona election review exploded into fireworks after a Maricopa County election official admitted that the county officials effectively deleted election data from materials turned over to auditors after receiving a legal subpoena from the Arizona Senate.
Maricopa County Supervisors Jack Sellers and Bill Gates, David Becker of the Center for Election Innovation and Research, Gowri Ramachandran of the Brennan Center for Justice and Arizona Senate audit liaison Ken Bennett appeared before the committee.
Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ) cross-examined Maricopa County Vice Chairman Bill Gates on the deletion of data in the materials turned over to the Arizona auditors.
The entire House Oversight Hearing can be watched below:
The Congressional hearing showed that Maricopa County election officials had deleted election data, obstructed an official investigation, and misled the public about its conduct during the 2020 election. The only thing that now remains is the critical part: Accountability.
Goh nu opeens alleen nog maar maricopa county waar blijven alle andere onderzoeken waar de republikeinse ophitsers het over gehad hebben.
Die zogenaamde miljoenen frauduleuze democratische stemmen waarover emotioneel over gedaan werd.
Die zogenaamde miljoenen frauduleuze democratische stemmen waarover emotioneel over gedaan werd.
EXCLUSIVE: Over 50% of Voters in New Poll Say Big Tech Interfered in 2020 Election
Hihi. Al die hulp van Big Tech en de MSM, en nog fraude van clownesque proporties nodig hebben.quote:A new poll commissioned by MRC with McLaughlin & Associates shows 51.8 percent of voters blame Big Tech for “election interference” in the 2020 presidential election.
The Post uncovered emails indicating that then-candidate Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, “pursued lucrative deals involving China’s largest private energy company — including one that he said would be ‘interesting for me and my family.’” The story hit shortly before the 2020 election and Twitter and Facebook both took action against the Post China bombshell much like they had for a similar Hunter Biden scandal involving dealings in Ukraine. The Post account was censored, sharing the story was restricted and Twitter suspended users for even sharing the story.
Americans’ reactions to the social media censorship were part of the National Omnibus survey of 1,000 voters, and the findings spoke volumes. When asked “Do you believe Facebook, Twitter, and other social media sites' censoring of the now-confirmed Hunter Biden email story constitutes election interference?” 51.8 percent responded, “Yes.” Just 32.2 percent responded, “No” — nearly a 20 percent difference. An additional 15.9 percent said they didn’t know.
Nearly half of the respondents — 49.2 percent — also said it wasn’t “appropriate for Facebook and Twitter to block this story about Joe Biden from being seen by their users before the election.”
There were other interesting findings in the poll. Some American voters appear to have bought the media’s storyline at the time that the since-confirmed Hunter Biden story was the result of Russian disinformation.
The poll asked respondents if they believed the Hunter Biden scandal was true or if they merely thought it to be Russian disinformation. 29.6 percent responded that they believed it to be Russian disinformation.
In one damning poll result, 29.6 percent of those polled said that had they been aware of the “evidence Joe Biden lied about his knowledge of his son Hunter’s overseas business dealings,” they would have been “less likely” to vote for him. 15.6 percent of Democrats said this would have made them less likely to vote for Joe Biden.
This is not the first time that McLaughin & Associates revealed evidence that Big Tech stole the 2020 election by covering for Hunter Biden.
NewsBusters reported on previous McLaughlin & Associates research in late 2020 regarding Biden’s China scandal, which indicated that 36 percent of Biden voters were NOT aware of the evidence linking Joe Biden to corrupt financial dealings with China through his son Hunter. Thirteen percent of these voters (or 4.6 percent of Biden’s total vote) said that had they known these facts, they would not have voted for the former vice president.
MRC President Brent Bozell scorched Big Tech and Big Media at the time for stealing the 2020 election:
“It is an indisputable fact that the media stole the election. The American electorate was intentionally kept in the dark. During the height of the scandal surrounding Hunter Biden’s foreign dealings, the media and the big tech companies did everything in their power to cover it up. Twitter and Facebook limited sharing of the New York Post’s reports, and the liberal media omitted it from their coverage or dismissed it as Russian disinformation.”
This national survey of 1,000 likely voters was conducted on October 14-18, 2021. Results have an accuracy of +/- 3.1% at a 95% confidence interval.
Ah je hebt inmiddels bewijs voor de fraude gevonden, zo ja kun je dat dan ook met ons delen want dat meer dan 50% van de kiezers volgens deze poll denkt dat er fraude is gepleegd betekend nog steeds niet dat dit ook zo is. Feiten trekken zich namelijk weinig aan van peilingen.quote:Op donderdag 28 oktober 2021 11:09 schreef QuidProJoe het volgende:
EXCLUSIVE: Over 50% of Voters in New Poll Say Big Tech Interfered in 2020 Election
[..]
Hihi. Al die hulp van Big Tech en de MSM, en nog fraude van clownesque proporties nodig hebben.
Hihihi. Wederom een mooi gevalletje "hoe kan ik anderen laten zien dat ik niks heb gelezen en geen idee heb waar ik over praat" zonder het daadwerkelijk te zeggen.quote:
[..]
Ah je hebt inmiddels bewijs voor de fraude gevonden, zo ja kun je dat dan ook met ons delen want dat meer dan 50% van de kiezers volgens deze poll denkt dat er fraude is gepleegd betekend nog steeds niet dat dit ook zo is. Feiten trekken zich namelijk weinig aan van peilingen.
Wat een emotionele reactie, nogmaals jij stelt dat er gefraudeerd zou zijn door o.a. Big Tech en ik vraag je naar bewijs voor deze stelling, dat je wederom weer geen bewijs kunt produceren is weer uitermate teleurstellend te noemen.quote:
[..]
Hihihi. Wederom een mooi gevalletje "hoe kan ik anderen laten zien dat ik niks heb gelezen en geen idee heb waar ik over praat" zonder het daadwerkelijk te zeggen.
Kan je eerst jouw stelling bewijzen, namelijk dat ik dat heb gesteld wat jij zegt? Het lijkt me immers niet dat ik een stelling dien te verdedigen die ik niet heb gemaakt.quote:
[..]
Wat een emotionele reactie, nogmaals jij stelt dat er gefraudeerd zou zijn door o.a. Big Tech en ik vraag je naar bewijs voor deze stelling, dat je wederom weer geen bewijs kunt produceren is weer uitermate teleurstellend te noemen.
Het is toch opvallend om te zien hoe afhankelijk van stropoppen en andere drogredeneringen de MSM-volgers zijn. De objectieve waarheid zou die middelen niet nodig hebben.
Dat staat gewoon letterlijk in de quote waar ik op reageerquote:
[..]
Kan je eerst jouw stelling bewijzen, namelijk dat ik dat heb gesteld wat jij zegt? Het lijkt me immers niet dat ik een stelling dien te verdedigen die ik niet heb gemaakt.
Het is toch opvallend om te zien hoe afhankelijk van stropoppen en andere drogredeneringen de MSM-volgers zijn. De objectieve waarheid zou die middelen niet nodig hebben.
Maar waar is dat bewijs dan waar al door velen en vaak om gevraagd is in dit topic?quote:Hihi. Al die hulp van Big Tech en de MSM, en nog fraude van clownesque proporties nodig hebben.
En ben je zo'n schaap dat je een poll als bewijs ziet voor die vermeende fraude, ik ben namelijk wel iets kritischer?
Maar daar staat helemaal niet dat Big Tech heeft gefraudeerd. Tevens schreef je "zo ja kun je dat dan ook met ons delen want dat meer dan 50% van de kiezers volgens deze poll denkt dat er fraude is gepleegd" en "En ben je zo'n schaap dat je een poll als bewijs ziet voor die vermeende fraude, ik ben namelijk wel iets kritischer?". Waar staat dat eigenlijk in dat stuk dat ik heb gepost?quote:
[..]
Dat staat gewoon letterlijk in de quote waar ik op reageer
[..]
Maar waar is dat bewijs dan waar al door velen en vaak om gevraagd is in dit topic?
En ben je zo'n schaap dat je een poll als bewijs ziet voor die vermeende fraude, ik ben namelijk wel iets kritischer?
QPJ/Ensiferum weet gewoon dat er geen enkel bewijs is voor grootschalige fraude door de democraten/msm/big tech of wie dan ook joh. Hij loopt of gewoon te trollen, of is gewoon echt delusional als hij echt in die fraude gelooft. Daarom komt hij nooit met bewijs, want dat bewijs bestaat simpelweg niet. Ik snap dan ook niet waarom dit topic nog open is, los van de entertainmentwaarde die users zoals hem leveren.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam
There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die.
There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die.
