[AMV] Amerikaanse politiek #633 Bye Bye Sarah

quote:

Op vrijdag 14 juni 2019 11:13 schreef Ensiferum het volgende:
Wie zouden goede opvolgers van Sanders zijn als press secretary?

Milo Yiannopoulos of Alex Jones zouden leuke interacties met Jim Acosta hebben. En Milo is ook nog eens homo, da's goed voor de woke-punten.

quote:

Op vrijdag 14 juni 2019 11:13 schreef Ensiferum het volgende:
Wie zouden goede opvolgers van Sanders zijn als press secretary?

Milo Yiannopoulos of Alex Jones zouden leuke interacties met Jim Acosta hebben. En Milo is ook nog eens homo, da's goed voor de woke-punten.

quote:

Op vrijdag 14 juni 2019 11:51 schreef Hexagon het volgende:
Als ik de naam Buttigieg zie moet ik steeds aan een mix van Buttplug en Ballgag denken

quote:

Op vrijdag 14 juni 2019 11:53 schreef archito het volgende:

[..]

Dat kan wellicht ook aan jouw referentiekader liggen.

quote:

Op vrijdag 14 juni 2019 12:43 schreef klappernootopreis het volgende:
https://www.politico.com/(...)er-hatch-act-1364221

de volgende?

quote:

Op vrijdag 14 juni 2019 12:47 schreef xpompompomx het volgende:

[..]

Ik durf te wedden dat de gewoon mag blijven zitten van de grote maffiabaas.

twitter:

MeetThePress twitterde op donderdag 13-06-2019 om 23:54:05 NEW: Gov. Steve Bullock (D-Mont.) reacts to not making the first Democratic debate: @GovernorBullock: "Of course, Chuck, I'm disappointed with the DNC." reageer retweet

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op donderdag 13-06-2019 om 22:10:26 After 3 1/2 years, our wonderful Sarah Huckabee Sanders will be leaving the White House at the end of the month and going home to the Great State of Arkansas.... reageer retweet

twitter:

business twitterde op vrijdag 14-06-2019 om 13:21:06 Julian Assange tells a London court that his life is “effectively at stake” as he battles being sent to the U.S. where he faces charges that he endangered national security https://t.co/ewcjDllVTN reageer retweet

twitter:

davidfrum twitterde op vrijdag 14-06-2019 om 13:23:41 When Assange was warned that publishing the names of Afghans who had cooperated with US forces might put *THEIR* lives at risk, he replied: "Well, they're informants. So, if they get killed, they've got it coming to them. They deserve it." https://t.co/R81l3NxU8F https://t.co/PAIXGItmDW reageer retweet

twitter:

kylegriffin1 twitterde op vrijdag 14-06-2019 om 14:00:01 Interesting exchange here. 1:35 in. STEPHANOPOULOS: If you answered these questions to me now, why not answer them to Robert Mueller under oath? TRUMP: Because— [pause] they were looking to get us for lies. https://t.co/krjOSeTg2P reageer retweet

twitter:

PeterAlexander twitterde op vrijdag 14-06-2019 om 14:55:32 Trump, with Fox & Friends, on the First Lady: "We have our own Jackie O today, it's called Melania. We'll call it 'Melania T.'" reageer retweet

quote:

Op vrijdag 14 juni 2019 11:15 schreef KoosVogels het volgende:

[..]

Wat was nou precies de hypocrisie waar je op doelde in je reactie richting mij?

twitter:

kylegriffin1 twitterde op vrijdag 14-06-2019 om 14:45:10 Trump on foreign dirt: "Of course you have to look at it because, if you don't look at it, you're not going to know if it's bad. How are you going to know if it's bad?"Via Fox https://t.co/e0e3JoAvbd reageer retweet

twitter:

rgoodlaw twitterde op vrijdag 14-06-2019 om 14:56:34 Trump: don’t report foreign government’s offering dirt until you actually take it and decide whether it’s bad.As the Chair of Federal Election Commission reminded yesterday: “It is ILLEGAL...to solicit, accept, or RECEIVE anything of value” from foreign national for a campaign. https://t.co/HbP7XiRMjA reageer retweet

FEC Chair: Entire US Gov't. Must Speak Out | Morning Joe | MSNBC

twitter:

kylegriffin1 twitterde op vrijdag 14-06-2019 om 17:42:47 Interesting response: Kayleigh McEnany, the national press secretary for the Trump 2020 campaign, said that the Trump campaign would handle offers of information on opponents from foreign entities on a "case by case basis."https://t.co/z7L7P0Z2yy reageer retweet

twitter:

ABC twitterde op vrijdag 14-06-2019 om 11:35:06 EXCLUSIVE: Pres. Trump tells @GStephanopoulos he never suggested firing special counsel Robert Mueller—and what ex-White House counsel Don McGahn told Mueller “doesn’t matter." https://t.co/KcBTRmDQHH https://t.co/wG3z1TqJIw reageer retweet

quote:

President Trump disputed White House counsel Don McGahn’s testimony that the president had instructed him to fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller telling ABC News anchor George Stephanopoulos that McGahn “may have been confused.” Trump who has refused to testify under oath said in a contentious back-and-forth that “the story on that very simply, number one, I was never going to fire Mueller. I never suggested firing Mueller.” When Stephanopoulos brought up McGahn’s extensive testimony under oath to the contrary, Trump countered “I don’t care what [McGahn] says, it doesn’t matter.”

Why does Trump think the White House counsel would lie under oath? “Because he wanted to make himself look like a good lawyer,” Trump said. “Or he believed it because I would constantly tell anybody that would listen—including you, including the media—that Robert Mueller was conflicted. Robert Mueller had a total conflict of interest.” “And has to go?” Stephanopoulos asked. “I didn’t say that,” Trump responded.

Trump explained that he didn’t testify before the special counsel because, basically, he lies a lot. “[T]hey were looking to get us for lies or slight misstatements,” Trump said. “I looked at what happened to people, and it was very unfair. Very, very unfair. Very unfair.” Trump said while he didn’t testify he did provide written answers to Mueller’s questions he surely has never actually read. Stephanopoulos pointed out that the written answers didn’t address potential obstruction of justice.

“Wait a minute,” Trump said. “Wait a minute. I did answer questions. I answered them in writing.” “Not on obstruction,” Stephanopoulos interrupted. “George, you’re being a little wise guy, OK—which is, you know, typical for you,” Trump said. “Just so you understand. Very simple. It’s very simple. There was no crime. There was no collusion. The big thing’s collusion. Now, there’s no collusion. That means they set—it was a setup, in my opinion, and I think it’s going to come out.”