Precies.quote:Op dinsdag 23 april 2019 11:41 schreef klappernootopreis het volgende:
[..]
allicht. Pence is er een die maar al te graag het "beleid" van Trump wil doorzetten. En dit weet Pelosi.
Benieuwd wat Pence te verbergen heeft.twitter:kylegriffin1 twitterde op dinsdag 23-04-2019 om 18:00:09Mike Pence hasn't released any tax returns since taking office, WSJ reports.It's getting less attention, but it's just as precedent-breaking: Going back to Walter Mondale in the 1970s, all of Pence's predecessors have disclosed their returns. https://t.co/MrSiZyBr4K reageer retweet
Nixon kon ook niet meteen rekenen op een impeachment procedure. Die had eerst hoorzittingen in de Senaat (waarna hij voordat de procedure werd ingezet af trad). Het zou nog best wel kunnen dat als bijvoorbeeld Mueller gehoord wordt er aan de hand van wat hij verklaart een dergelijke procedure gestart zou worden al blijf ik me af vragen hoe electoraal verstandig dat zou zijn ... staat tegenover dat een precedent scheppen door niks te doen ook eigenlijk niet kan, maar ja.quote:Op dinsdag 23 april 2019 18:13 schreef Beathoven het volgende:
[..]
Precies.
Misschien klinkt het als desinteresse. Ik volgde de ontwikkelingen iedere dag, maar met het signaal van Pelosi heb ik me er eigenlijk al bij neergelegd dat men in een bananenstaatsituatie zit.
Gezien de weinige kansen of openingen die er nu zelfs met het grofst mogelijke "geschut" zijn en Trump theoretisch gezien opnieuw gekozen kan worden is het imho stukken minder interessant geworden om de doorsudderende Amerikaanse politiek of die van een andere corrupte regering van dag tot dag te volgen.
Nixon is ook wel een mooi voorbeeld van hoe politiek dat soort procedures zijn. Je hoort nu vrijwel niemand meer een lans breken voor de daden van Nixon, maar in de house judicial committee stemden alle 21 Democraten unaniem voor het starten van impeachment voor obstructie en machtsmisbruik, terwijl de Republikeinen in meerderheid tegenstemden. Voor de geheime bombardementen op Cambodja en belastingontduiking stemden de Democraten dan weer in kleine meerderheid voor impeachment, terwijl de Republikeinen juist weer unaniem tegenstemden.quote:Op dinsdag 23 april 2019 18:28 schreef ExtraWaskracht het volgende:
[..]
Nixon kon ook niet meteen rekenen op een impeachment procedure. Die had eerst hoorzittingen in de Senaat (waarna hij voordat de procedure werd ingezet af trad). Het zou nog best wel kunnen dat als bijvoorbeeld Mueller gehoord wordt er aan de hand van wat hij verklaart een dergelijke procedure gestart zou worden al blijf ik me af vragen hoe electoraal verstandig dat zou zijn ... staat tegenover dat een precedent scheppen door niks te doen ook eigenlijk niet kan, maar ja.
quote:The White House plans to fight a subpoena issued by the House Judiciary Committee for former White House counsel Donald McGahn to testify, according to people familiar with the matter, setting up another showdown in the aftermath of the special counsel report.
The Trump administration also plans to oppose other requests from House committees for the testimony of current and former aides about actions in the White House described in special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s report, according to two people familiar with internal thinking.
White House lawyers plan to tell attorneys for administration witnesses called by the House that they will be asserting executive privilege over their testimony, officials said.
Such a move will intensify an ongoing power struggle between the Trump administration and congressional Democrats, potentially setting up a protracted court battle.
McGahn was mentioned more than 150 times in Mueller’s report and provided damaging accounts to investigators about how the president pressured him to oust the special counsel and then pushed him to publicly deny the episode.
McGahn's lawyer, William Burck, began discussions with the House Judiciary Committee about his potential testimony after the panel issued a subpoena Monday, according to people familiar with the matter.SPOILEROm spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.twitter:kylegriffin1 twitterde op woensdag 24-04-2019 om 01:20:24Chairman Nadler responds: "This evening's reports, if accurate, represent one more act of obstruction by an Administration desperate to prevent the public from talking about the President's behavior. The Committee's subpoena stands. I look forward to Mr. McGahn's testimony." reageer retweet
twitter:AdamSchiff twitterde op woensdag 24-04-2019 om 04:36:05Trump is resisting every Congressional request for testimony and documents related to our oversight responsibility.Like an aspiring autocrat, he doesn't recognize the co-equal branches of our government.He has lived his entire life without accountability.That ends now. https://t.co/QixgD7zGBs reageer retweet
[ Bericht 11% gewijzigd door Kijkertje op 24-04-2019 06:40:30 ]“The fundamental cause of the trouble in the modern world today is that the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.”— Bertrand Russell
quote:Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin on Tuesday told a key lawmaker he would make a final decision as to whether to furnish President Trump’s tax returns by May 6, committing for the first time to a specific deadline in what has become a major Washington power struggle.
In a 10-page letter to House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Richard E. Neal (D-Mass.), Mnuchin said the Democrats’ request for Trump’s tax returns raised constitutional and privacy issues that needed to be resolved by the Justice Department before he could make a decision on how to proceed.
The letter repeatedly cast doubt on the motivations of Democrats in seeking the tax return information. Mnuchin served as Trump’s finance chairman during the 2016 presidential campaign, and the president already has signaled he does not want the information released, but multiple legal scholars have said they don’t see much precedent for Mnuchin to ignore the congressional inquiry.
Still, Treasury Department officials have taken steps to make their reluctance to turn over the records legally defensible. Tuesday’s letter contained 48 footnotes.SPOILEROm spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.“The fundamental cause of the trouble in the modern world today is that the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.”— Bertrand Russell
quote:Jared Kushner, in his first public comments since the public release of special counsel Robert Mueller’s final report, on Tuesday downplayed the effect of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, which saw his father-in-law win the Oval Office.
“You look at what Russia did, buying some Facebook ads and trying to sow dissent. It’s a terrible thing,” Kushner, who is also one of President Donald Trump’s senior advisers, said at a Time magazine event in New York. “But I think the investigations and all of the speculation that’s happened for the last two years has a much harsher impact on our democracy than a couple Facebook ads.”
The Justice Department, however, is offering a starkly different assessment of the potential dangers of a Russian intelligence operation to U.S. national security — and argues that it doesn’t take a master spy to do serious harm.
In a little-noticed court filing on Friday, an expert witness for the government, Robert Anderson Jr., a former assistant director of the FBI’s counterintelligence division, outlined how the activities of Russian gun-rights activist Mariia Butina during the election contained all the hallmarks of a sophisticated intelligence operation.
Anderson’s declaration has spawned a new fight between the government and Butina’s lawyers, who countered that it was speculative and blurred the line between informal networking and clandestine intelligence operations.
But the filing also sheds light on how the Justice Department views the ongoing threat of Russian attempts to influence American politics and goes well beyond what Mueller’s team was able to say in its 448-page report.
Allowing Russia to “bypass formal channels of diplomacy, win concessions, and exert influence within the United States” by entertaining backchannel lines of communication could result in “commensurate harm to the United States, including harm to the integrity of the United States’ political processes and internal government dealings, as well as to U.S. foreign policy interests and national security,” Anderson wrote.SPOILEROm spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.“The fundamental cause of the trouble in the modern world today is that the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.”— Bertrand Russell
twitter:JohnWDean twitterde op woensdag 24-04-2019 om 03:11:11Trump says he is opposed to White House aides testifying to Congress. Unless the witness agrees Trump can't stop them without a court order, which would be unprecedented and doubtful. He can't gag his former aides, and it is criminal to threaten them. https://t.co/VruD3j4kyW reageer retweet
twitter:mkraju twitterde op woensdag 24-04-2019 om 00:58:36Neal response: "This afternoon, Secretary Mnuchin notified me that once again, the IRS will miss the deadline for my 6103 request. I plan to consult with counsel about my next steps." https://t.co/nOlYJtMUnM reageer retweet
twitter:EamonJavers twitterde op dinsdag 23-04-2019 om 17:32:27I asked Hogan Gidley if President Trump will accept Russian help in the 2020 election. He said “I don’t understand the question” and pointed out that the president has “already denounced multiple times Russian involvement” in the 2016 cycle. https://t.co/QeZ6xwPEai reageer retweet
twitter:maggieNYT twitterde op dinsdag 23-04-2019 om 17:35:05When did potus “denounce” Russian involvement? https://t.co/ldFugDiyGY reageer retweet
quote:Congressman Larry Hogan was the only Republican to vote for all three Nixon articles of impeachment. He quoted Abraham Lincoln saying "we cannot escape history."
Truth. Wat er aan te doen echter?!twitter:EvanMcMullin twitterde op woensdag 24-04-2019 om 03:40:30I can't stress enough the extent to which Trump's base now lives in an alternative info environment and who can blame them? Everyone is lying to them. Trump. His team. Many right-wing commentators. Congressional Republicans. The GOP. Fox News. This is a huge long-term problem. reageer retweet
Pence heeft zich de laatste twee jaar angstvallig stil gehouden. Het feit blijft wel dat hij deel uit maakte van dezelfde campagne-caravaan als Trump. Dan kun je zwijgen wat je wil, maar ben je toch besmet.quote:Op dinsdag 23 april 2019 18:19 schreef Ulx het volgende:
Benieuwd wat Pence te verbergen heeft.twitter:kylegriffin1 twitterde op dinsdag 23-04-2019 om 18:00:09Mike Pence hasn't released any tax returns since taking office, WSJ reports.It's getting less attention, but it's just as precedent-breaking: Going back to Walter Mondale in the 1970s, all of Pence's predecessors have disclosed their returns. https://t.co/MrSiZyBr4K reageer retweet
Ik denk niet dat die veel te verbergen heeft, maar als Pence zijn tax returns openbaart, dan zijn er nog minder redenen voor Trump om dat niet te doen.quote:Op dinsdag 23 april 2019 18:19 schreef Ulx het volgende:
Benieuwd wat Pence te verbergen heeft.twitter:kylegriffin1 twitterde op dinsdag 23-04-2019 om 18:00:09Mike Pence hasn't released any tax returns since taking office, WSJ reports.It's getting less attention, but it's just as precedent-breaking: Going back to Walter Mondale in the 1970s, all of Pence's predecessors have disclosed their returns. https://t.co/MrSiZyBr4K reageer retweet
En dit afdoen al een paar facebook ads. Hij is er blijkbaar niet van bewust hoe subliminale boodschappen werken? Of juist wél.quote:Op woensdag 24 april 2019 05:10 schreef Kijkertje het volgende:
Nog even de beelden van Kushner:
"You look at what Russia did, buying some Facebook ads to try to sow dissent and do it, and it's a terrible thing," Kushner said. "But I think the investigations and all of the speculation that's happened for the last two years has had a much harsher impact on our democracy than a couple of Facebook ads."![]()
Russian Influence Reached 126 Million Through Facebook Alone
twitter:Joe_Gerth twitterde op maandag 22-04-2019 om 21:26:29Is the Russian mob coming to Kentucky? https://t.co/5ghtJhHDGr via @courierjournal reageer retweet
twitter:Joe_Gerth twitterde op maandag 22-04-2019 om 21:29:35Oh, and I had a hunch the Russians were involved nearly a year and a half ago when Braidy didn't want its employees criticizing the president. https://t.co/MgZ02nJ9Xk reageer retweet
Blijkbaar is de Turtle nog corrupter dan gedacht.twitter:MollyMcKew twitterde op dinsdag 23-04-2019 om 02:33:05Why local journalism is important: Kentucky governor put taxpayer $$ into an aluminum plant owned by one of his backers. Then the 2 KY senators, McConnell+Paul, were 2 of 3 votes needed to overturn sanctions on Deripaska, whose Rusal then invested $200mil in the plant. Get it? https://t.co/p8wrTT1jtU reageer retweet
twitter:kylegriffin1 twitterde op dinsdag 23-04-2019 om 23:55:40Trump complained about his follower count in his White House meeting with Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey today, WaPo reports.https://t.co/V7IWu9jM65 reageer retweet
Het zal ook niet...twitter:RepMaxineWaters twitterde op dinsdag 23-04-2019 om 22:15:41Another strike against Treasury Sec. Mnuchin. Sears sued Mnuchin, claiming that he was among the board members who helped the CEO strip Sears of $2 BILLION in assets. Wow! Trump, his cabinet, & his inner circle show up in so many fraudulent efforts! Are they all crooks? reageer retweet
Trump weigert gewoon de VS te beschermen tegen vijanden domestic & abroad.twitter:maggieNYT twitterde op woensdag 24-04-2019 om 11:02:31Before Nielsen was forced out, she tried to focus the White House on one of her highest priorities as DHS secretary: preparing for new and different Russian forms of interference in 2020. Mulvaney told her not to bring it up in front of the president. https://t.co/WDNjfC52O4 reageer retweet
Benieuwd. Een beetje lekkere oorlog is goed voor de ratings.twitter:realDonaldTrump twitterde op woensdag 24-04-2019 om 14:00:46Mexico’s Soldiers recently pulled guns on our National Guard Soldiers, probably as a diversionary tactic for drug smugglers on the Border. Better not happen again! We are now sending ARMED SOLDIERS to the Border. Mexico is not doing nearly enough in apprehending & returning! reageer retweet
Eindelijk weer eens oorlog met Mexico vanwege een verzonnen crisisquote:Op woensdag 24 april 2019 14:04 schreef Ulx het volgende:
Benieuwd. Een beetje lekkere oorlog is goed voor de ratings.twitter:realDonaldTrump twitterde op woensdag 24-04-2019 om 14:00:46Mexico’s Soldiers recently pulled guns on our National Guard Soldiers, probably as a diversionary tactic for drug smugglers on the Border. Better not happen again! We are now sending ARMED SOLDIERS to the Border. Mexico is not doing nearly enough in apprehending & returning! reageer retweet
MAGA! Het economische genie dat Trump heet flikt het toch maar even! Of zo.twitter:kylegriffin1 twitterde op woensdag 24-04-2019 om 13:30:00Trump's washing machine tariffs cost U.S. consumers $815,000 for every job created, according to new research. https://t.co/FvunJwzcMm reageer retweet
twitter:realDonaldTrump twitterde op woensdag 24-04-2019 om 14:10:06The Mueller Report, despite being written by Angry Democrats and Trump Haters, and with unlimited money behind it ($35,000,000), didn’t lay a glove on me. I DID NOTHING WRONG. If the partisan Dems ever tried to Impeach, I would first head to the U.S. Supreme Court. Not only...... reageer retweet
twitter:realDonaldTrump twitterde op woensdag 24-04-2019 om 14:18:31.....are there no “High Crimes and Misdemeanors,” there are no Crimes by me at all. All of the Crimes were committed by Crooked Hillary, the Dems, the DNC and Dirty Cops - and we caught them in the act! We waited for Mueller and WON, so now the Dems look to Congress as last hope! reageer retweet
twitter:ddale8 twitterde op woensdag 24-04-2019 om 14:48:241) Trump has offered no proof of crimes by people who investigated him; 2) Trump can ask all he wants, but the Supreme Court doesn't hear challenges to impeachment, a political process; 3) "High crimes and misdemeanors" don't have to be actual criminal offenses. https://t.co/GkqcMRMao7 reageer retweet
| Forum Opties | |
|---|---|
| Forumhop: | |
| Hop naar: | |