[AMV] Amerikaanse politiek #610 Healthcare Bad Mmmkay!

quote:

Op zaterdag 30 maart 2019 21:19 schreef Ulx het volgende:

twitter:

LauraAJarrett twitterde op vrijdag 29-03-2019 om 20:16:06 News from AG Barr - Mueller report coming mid-April if not sooner; report nearly 400 pages; no plans for WH privilege review https://t.co/LmrG5A1qFZ reageer retweet

Dat zal Trump niet waarderen. Ik las ergens dat Barr zelf in de xhit kan komen als hij iets te enthousiast is in het wegstrepen van zaken die de Leider in de problemen zouden kunnen brengen.

twitter:

kylegriffin1 twitterde op vrijdag 29-03-2019 om 21:05:24 Jerry Nadler responds to the new Barr letter: "As I informed the Attorney General earlier this week, Congress requires the full and complete Mueller report, without redactions, as well as access to the underlying evidence, by April 2. That deadline still stands." reageer retweet

twitter:

kylegriffin1 twitterde op vrijdag 29-03-2019 om 21:10:30 Jerry Nadler responds to Bill Barr: "It is critical for AG Barr to come before Congress immediately to explain the rationale behind his letter, his rapid decision that the evidence developed was insufficient ... and his continued refusal to provide us with the full report." reageer retweet

twitter:

RepAdamSchiff twitterde op vrijdag 29-03-2019 om 22:25:03 Congress has asked for the entire Mueller report, and underlying evidence, by April 2. That deadline stands.In the meantime, Barr should seek court approval (just like in Watergate) to allow the release of grand jury material.Redactions are unacceptable. #ReleaseTheReport reageer retweet

Adam Schiff: Barr Memo Claim On Need For Obstruction Decision 'Flimsy' | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC

quote:

Barr’s position is indefensible. The Constitution gives the “the sole Power of Impeachment” to the House of Representatives, and the House Judiciary Committee has jurisdiction over impeachments. The Mueller investigation was, among other things, an investigation into possible criminal conduct by the president of the United States. There is no legal principle, including the separation of powers, that would permit the executive branch to block the results of an investigation into crimes allegedly committed by the president from the House of Representatives. To do so would deny the House’s ability to carry out its constitutional power of impeachment.

Politico

quote:

Op zaterdag 30 maart 2019 23:09 schreef Ulx het volgende:

twitter:

brianstelter twitterde op zaterdag 30-03-2019 om 22:30:50 Banner on @:CNN: "Trump says he's working with 4 to 5 senators on health care plan, but no such group appears to exist." reageer retweet

Als hij werkelijk een werkgroep zou hebben gestart zou hij wel namen kunnen noemen. De kwaliteit van zijn leugens neemt af.

twitter:

seungminkim twitterde op zaterdag 30-03-2019 om 22:59:16 Republicans have no intention of heeding Trump’s urgent demands to be come the “Party of Healthcare!” — not only is there no such plan, there’s no plan to make a plan. with @jdawsey1 https://t.co/kws2sSMA9M reageer retweet

twitter:

LucyFlores twitterde op vrijdag 29-03-2019 om 20:52:57 This was an incredibly difficult thing to do, but something that felt necessary. It took awhile before I found the words and the support that made me feel like this was finally a story I could tell. https://t.co/Sr5Go3xuTe reageer retweet

quote:

Op zaterdag 30 maart 2019 23:59 schreef epicbeardman het volgende:

twitter:

LucyFlores twitterde op vrijdag 29-03-2019 om 20:52:57 This was an incredibly difficult thing to do, but something that felt necessary. It took awhile before I found the words and the support that made me feel like this was finally a story I could tell. https://t.co/Sr5Go3xuTe reageer retweet

Engnek die Biden

quote:

In a major legal blow to President Trump’s push to expand offshore oil and gas development, a federal judge ruled that an executive order by Mr. Trump that lifted an Obama-era ban on oil and gas drilling in the Arctic Ocean and parts of the North Atlantic coast was unlawful.

The decision, by Judge Sharon L. Gleason of the United States District Court for the District of Alaska, concluded late Friday that President Barack Obama’s 2015 and 2016 withdrawal from drilling of about 120 million acres of Arctic Ocean and about 3.8 million acres in the Atlantic “will remain in full force and effect unless and until revoked by Congress.” She wrote that an April 2017 executive order by Mr. Trump revoking the drilling ban “is unlawful, as it exceeded the president’s authority.”

The decision, which is expected to be appealed in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, immediately reinstates the drilling ban on most of the Arctic Ocean off the coast of Alaska, a pristine region home to endangered species including polar bears and bowhead whales where oil companies have long sought to drill. Along the Atlantic coast, it blocks drilling around a series of coral canyons that run from Norfolk, Va., to the Canadian border which are home to unique deepwater corals and rare fish species.

In addition, Friday’s ruling by the judge, an Obama appointee, has broader implications for Mr. Trump’s effort to push drilling across the American coastline and on public lands.

Specifically, the Arctic Ocean drilling case could give legal ammunition to opponents of Mr. Trump’s efforts to roll back protections for two million acres of national monuments created by Mr. Obama and President Bill Clinton.

The case adds to a growing roster of legal losses for Mr. Trump’s efforts to undo Mr. Obama’s environmental legacy. Experts in environmental law estimate that the Trump administration has now lost about 40 environmental cases in federal courts.

Most immediately, the decision will force the Interior Department to withdraw the waters of the Arctic Ocean from its forthcoming plan detailing where the federal government intends to lease federal waters to oil companies for offshore drilling. A draft of that plan published last year called for drilling off the entire United States coastline.

The White House referred questions on the matter to the Interior Department, where a spokeswoman declined to comment.

SPOILER

Om spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.

twitter:

allinwithchris twitterde op zaterdag 30-03-2019 om 01:19:44 .@AOC: "I didn't expect them to make total fools of themselves." https://t.co/sT045pmqdD reageer retweet

quote:

Op zondag 31 maart 2019 00:14 schreef Ensiferum het volgende:
Denken jullie dat Schiff, Nadler, Maddow, Stelter etc, de zaak zullen laten gaan (en excuses aanbieden (hah! As if!)) wanneer het rapport niet brengt wat ze willen?

quote:

Op zondag 31 maart 2019 00:42 schreef EipNiC het volgende:

[..]

En als ik dit zeg dan ben ik een BNW-gekkie. Pre-teens aanranden lijkt me heel wat viezer dan sletjes bij de kut grijpen, niet?

quote:

Op zondag 31 maart 2019 11:01 schreef Knipoogje het volgende:

[..]

Het rapport zal heel veel brengen wat ze willen. Als daar nipt niet genoeg uit komt voor strafbare feiten, dan hoeven ze geen excuses aan te bieden. Dan hadden ze immers gelijk in dat Trump een idioot grote hoop vuil met zich mee draagt.

Als ze ook maar een fractie van het fanatisme van de Republikeinen bezitten volgt er sowieso geen excuses, maar een stuk of 6 vervolgonderzoeken (zie Benghazi). Maar goed, dat is een whataboutisme.

quote:

Op zondag 31 maart 2019 12:28 schreef speknek het volgende:

[..]

Iemand d'r haren ruiken is niet viezer dan iemand bij het geslachtsdeel grijpen, nee. Het ene is creepy, het andere crimineel.