Waarom lijkt jou dat een goed idee?quote:Op vrijdag 7 september 2018 00:05 schreef Nintex het volgende:
Nog even en de Republikeinen hebben het volledige rechtssysteem in handentwitter:SenateMajLdr twitterde op donderdag 06-09-2018 om 20:50:24The Senate confirmed 8 more of @POTUS’s judicial nominees today. reageer retweet
filmpje in tweettwitter:kylegriffin1 twitterde op vrijdag 07-09-2018 om 01:20:39Harris says she had "reliable information" Kavanaugh was part of a convo about Mueller with someone from the firm of Trump's personal lawyer.Kavanaugh: "The answer is no."Harris: "Thank you. And it would have been great if you could have said that last night." (via CSPAN) https://t.co/J9Dfl7y82a reageer retweet
quote:Op donderdag 6 september 2018 23:06 schreef Ulx het volgende:
De MSM zegt dat Alex Jones en Infowars nu ook van Twitter zijn getrapt.
quote:A Twitter spokesperson confirmed to The Daily Beast that Jones was suspended for a Periscope video he posted in which he berates CNN reporter Oliver Darcy.
"Those are the eyes of a rat," Jones told Darcy in the video. Jones also called the CNN reporter "the equivalent of like the Hitler Youth" and said that he smiles "like a possum that crawled out of the rear end of a dead cow."
The confrontation happened on Capitol Hill yesterday where Jones made a surprise appearance as Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey was testifying before Congress.
Giuliani to AP: Trump will not answer obstruction questionstwitter:davidjoachim twitterde op vrijdag 07-09-2018 om 01:35:59BREAKING:New York (AP) -- Trump will not answer federal investigators' questions, in writing or in person, about whether he tried to block the probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election, Giuliani tells @AP reageer retweet
quote:President Donald Trump will not answer federal investigators' questions, in writing or in person, about whether he tried to block the probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election, one of the president's attorneys told The Associated Press on Thursday.
Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani said questions about obstruction of justice were a "no-go."
Giuliani's statement was the most definitive rejection yet of special counsel Robert Mueller's efforts to interview the president about any efforts to obstruct the investigation into possible coordination between his campaign and Russians. It signals the Trump's lawyers are committed to protecting the president from answering questions about actions the president took in office.
It's unclear if Giuliani's public position has been endorsed by Trump, who has said he wants to answer questions under oath. Negotiations about the scope and format of an interview are still ongoing. If the legal team holds its stance, it could force Mueller to try to subpoena the president, likely triggering a standoff that would lead to the Supreme Court.
Mueller's office has previously sought to interview the president about the obstruction issue, including his firing last year of former FBI Director James Comey and his public attacks on Attorney General Jeff Sessions. Trump's legal team has argued that the president has the power to hire and fire appointees and the special counsel does not have the authority to ask him to explain those decisions. Giuliani said Thursday the team was steadfast in that position.
"That's a no-go. That is not going to happen," Giuliani said. "There will be no questions at all on obstruction."Told ya so!SPOILEROm spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.
twitter:SethAbramson twitterde op vrijdag 07-09-2018 om 01:53:05AS PREDICTED https://t.co/BMl3PnvFUI reageer retweet
(Oh en nee, ook ik draag Seth niet op handen en vind hem regelmatig erg emotioneel en te snel reageren. Hij corrigeert zichzelf daarop ook regelmatig en is niet te beroerd zijn excuses aan te bieden. Maar met zijn analyses wb de handel en wandel van Trump en kornuiten heeft hij er tot nu toe nog nooit naast gezeten.)twitter:SethAbramson twitterde op vrijdag 07-09-2018 om 01:57:452/ The first time I gave a rock-solid guarantee that Trump would land on this position was June 2017: 15 months ago. reageer retweet
[ Bericht 9% gewijzigd door Kijkertje op 07-09-2018 02:56:58 ]“The fundamental cause of the trouble in the modern world today is that the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.”— Bertrand Russell
twitter:SethAbramson twitterde op vrijdag 07-09-2018 om 02:17:37Trump publicly claims innocence, so he can't take the Fifth; to take the Fifth, he'd have to imply he could have criminal liability.Problem is, how many days after Trump asserts the Fifth do you think he'd be on Twitter protesting his innocence again, thereby screwing himself? reageer retweet
twitter:SethAbramson twitterde op vrijdag 07-09-2018 om 02:22:022/ And for what it's worth, you can't assert the Fifth on the claim that the government is corrupt and trying to frame you for a crime you didn't commit. reageer retweet
quote:A government photographer edited official pictures of Donald Trump’s inauguration to make the crowd appear bigger following a personal intervention from the president, according to newly released documents.
The photographer cropped out empty space “where the crowd ended” for a new set of pictures requested by Trump on the first morning of his presidency, after he was angered by images showing his audience was smaller than Barack Obama’s in 2009.
The detail was revealed in investigative reports released to the Guardian under the Freedom of Information Act by the inspector general of the US interior department. They shed new light on the first self-inflicted crisis of Trump’s presidency, when his White House falsely claimed he had attracted the biggest ever inauguration audience.SPOILEROm spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.“The fundamental cause of the trouble in the modern world today is that the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.”— Bertrand Russell
quote:This week’s revelations of a purported “resistance” force of senior government officials acting as guardrails against President Trump — manipulating him, infantilizing him and ignoring his directives — raised the specter of a shadow administration.
“Who’s in charge at the White House?” a reporter shouted at Trump on Thursday as he departed for a rally in Montana.
The president did not answer.
An anonymous editorial in the New York Times, from someone identified only as a senior official, and a new Bob Woodward book, “Fear,” detail efforts at the highest levels of the government to contain Trump’s impulses and, in the most extreme cases, defy and even undermine his orders.
The successive disclosures crystallized what has long been evident throughout the Trump presidency — a cadre of administration officials alarmed by the whims and wishes of a chief executive they view as mercurial and impetuous working to curb his instincts on a range of issues, including national security, trade and immigration.SPOILEROm spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.“The fundamental cause of the trouble in the modern world today is that the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.”— Bertrand Russell
De comments eronder zijn disturbing vermakelijk.quote:Op vrijdag 7 september 2018 04:33 schreef OMG het volgende:
https://mobile.twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1037883056252694528
Ananamish? Amominous?
Ik hoop dat deze vent alles kwijtraakt. Laat een van de Clintons zijn celdeur opslot doen.quote:
quote:Op donderdag 6 september 2018 16:55 schreef Kijkertje het volgende:
Filmpje in tweettwitter:kylegriffin1 twitterde op donderdag 06-09-2018 om 16:15:11Cory Booker says he's going to violate Senate rules and release an email kept confidential on "racial profiling" to "expose" that docs being withheld "have nothing to do with national security.""I understand that the penalty comes with potential ousting from the Senate." (ABC) https://t.co/fzAEM4J8Ej reageer retweet
quote:Op donderdag 6 september 2018 16:55 schreef Ulx het volgende:
twitter:kylegriffin1 twitterde op donderdag 06-09-2018 om 16:15:11Cory Booker says he's going to violate Senate rules and release an email kept confidential on "racial profiling" to "expose" that docs being withheld "have nothing to do with national security.""I understand that the penalty comes with potential ousting from the Senate." (ABC) https://t.co/fzAEM4J8Ej reageer retweet
twitter:kylegriffin1 twitterde op donderdag 06-09-2018 om 16:25:15Mazie Hirono announces that she'll also release a Committee confidential document to the press, says that if Cory Booker is going to be punished, "count me in, too." reageer retweet
twitter:kylegriffin1 twitterde op donderdag 06-09-2018 om 16:35:57Dick Durbin to Cory Booker: "I concur with what you are doing. Let's jump into this pit together ... If there is going to be some retribution against the senator from New Jersey, count me in. I want to be part of this process." (via CBS) https://t.co/4x9FW84L10 reageer retweet
twitter:kylegriffin1 twitterde op donderdag 06-09-2018 om 16:45:25Democrats were saying "bring it on" as John Cornyn told them that Cory Booker had clearly broken Senate rules. reageer retweet
Alleen dan weer jammer dat zijn "spartacus" moment bijelkaar lijkt te zijn verzonnen.quote:Op donderdag 6 september 2018 16:57 schreef Ulx het volgende:
twitter:SenSchumer twitterde op donderdag 06-09-2018 om 16:28:38I stand with Judiciary Committee Democrats who are well within their rights to release these very important documents that a former Kavanaugh deputy designed as “committee confidential.”The American ppl deserve to know the truth about Judge Kavanaugh’s record. #WhatAreTheyHiding? reageer retweet
Vandaar dat ik geen tijd heb om fire and fury uit te lezen. ,Ik kom er gewoon niet aan toe.quote:Op donderdag 6 september 2018 20:14 schreef clumsy_clown het volgende:
Herenmetiet, er is bijna geen ruimte voor een adempauze tussen al het nieuws door. Over twee weken begint Manaforts tweede zaak alweer, en het is nog maar de vraag of de stof van kavenaugh en het boek dan al is gesetteld.
Nou en?quote:Op vrijdag 7 september 2018 08:48 schreef Refragmental het volgende:
[..]
[..]
[..]
Alleen dan weer jammer dat zijn "spartacus" moment bijelkaar lijkt te zijn verzonnen.
http://www.foxnews.com/en(...)o-be-inaccurate.html
Dat was eigenlijk ook niet de intentie van de DEMS. Die hadden een ander doel. Hirono deed de echte zet, terwijl Booker de aandacht trok..quote:
Juist. 2d dammen enzo.quote:Op vrijdag 7 september 2018 09:06 schreef klappernootopreis het volgende:
[..]
Dat was eigenlijk ook niet de intentie van de DEMS. Die hadden een ander doel. Hirono deed de echte zet, terwijl Booker de aandacht trok..
Is 2d dammen niet gewoon dammen?quote:
Bovendien die documenten zijn er voor alle Amerikanen, ook de democraten. Zou jij een rechter vertrouwen die maar een klein deel van de feiten tot zijn beschikking heeft? Ik niet. Dan kunnen ze net zo goed dit soort rechters op die plek zetten:quote:Op vrijdag 7 september 2018 09:11 schreef ExtraWaskracht het volgende:
[..]
Is 2d dammen niet gewoon dammen?
Ik heb verder de stukken niet gelezen en ook niet echt de commentaren, maar als het niks voorstelt, waarom dan de moeite om alles maar geheim te houden? Zou de default niet moeten zijn: het is openbaar tenzij?
Dat kan zomaar kloppen. Hij is ook gister pas toegevoegd op 538, zoals hier te zien is: https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/quote:Op donderdag 6 september 2018 19:23 schreef martijnde3de het volgende:
[..]
Hij kwam net voorbij bij mij op twitter, vandaar dat ik hem deel.
Bring ittwitter:CoryBooker twitterde op donderdag 06-09-2018 om 20:04:58Today members of @JudiciaryDems released committee confidential docs about Judge Kavanaugh that were previously hidden from public view. We will continue to release more committee confidential documents to draw attention to this sham process. https://t.co/Iap1KgJXzK reageer retweet
Freisler past wel bij Trump met zijn ordinaire gegil in de rechtzaalquote:Op vrijdag 7 september 2018 09:21 schreef klappernootopreis het volgende:
[..]
Bovendien die documenten zijn er voor alle Amerikanen, ook de democraten. Zou jij een rechter vertrouwen die maar een klein deel van de feiten tot zijn beschikking heeft? Ik niet. Dan kunnen ze net zo goed dit soort rechters op die plek zetten:
[ afbeelding ]
Het is ook de schuld van die “supporters” dat hij in het WH zit.quote:Op vrijdag 7 september 2018 09:52 schreef Ulx het volgende:
Trump tells supporters it'll be 'your fault' if he gets impeached
Fans: Meet Bus. Bus: Meet fans.
| Forum Opties | |
|---|---|
| Forumhop: | |
| Hop naar: | |