BNW Brave New World
Samenzwering, verborgen agenda's en geheime geschiedenis. De zoektocht naar de wereld die achter de façade van alledag ligt.
Just a few thousand kilo's? That's like nothing!quote:Op maandag 30 april 2018 13:32 schreef Tingo het volgende:
[..]
767-200 and 767-200ER are the same size.The 767-200 is just a few tons lighter.
You obviously haven't read the specs and stats very well.
1 + 1 = blauw
I want to ask you this nicely.quote:
[..]
Wrong again.
De fictieve 9/11 vliegtuigen zelfde maat waren.
Eentje ietsjes lichter was.
Als we de officiele onzin verhaaltjes moeten geloven
Can u stop saying that those planes were fake/fictive?
Het antwoord op de belangrijkste vraag van alle vragen? 42!
Same size planes, same destinations, same distances, roughly the same payload. There would absolutely no good reason to be at maximum fuel capacity at take-off for either flight.quote:
According to Hek and his magical figures (which he seems to have just pulled out of the air) - one of the fictitious planes used about 10 times as much fuel as the other.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Jij vind 24000 gallons pretty much the same als 11000 gallons max capacity?quote:
[..]
The fictitious 9/11 flights were pretty much the same.
The flightplanners would know almost exactly how much fuel would be required for the trip. Why would they fill them to capacity and then let them fly with so much unused fuel on board? Thats not very cost efficient at all.
Die brandstoftanks zijn meer dan twee keer zo groot man. De hoeveelheid brandstof aan boord hangt van zoveel factoren af, niet alleen van de vluchtduur.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
De brandstoftank ging het om... Die is meer dan twee keer zo groot voor de ER versie.quote:
[..]
767-200 and 767-200ER are the same size.The 767-200 is just a few tons lighter.
You obviously haven't read the specs and stats very well.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Waar zeg ik dat dan?quote:
[..]
Same size planes, same destinations, same distances, roughly the same payload. There would absolutely no good reason to be at maximum fuel capacity at take-off for either flight.
According to Hek and his magical figures (which he seems to have just pulled out of the air) - one of the fictitious planes used about 10 times as much fuel as the other.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Now you're lying again. You just pointed out some differences yourself, which you are now ignoring. All because you have this preconceived notion that any official story is a lie.quote:
[..]
Same size planes, same destinations, same distances, roughly the same payload. There would absolutely no good reason to be at maximum fuel capacity at take-off for either flight.
According to Hek and his magical figures (which he seems to have just pulled out of the air) - one of the fictitious planes used about 10 times as much fuel as the other.
1 + 1 = blauw
Een beetje een grote muil hebben over feiten en details, maar zelf steeds verkondigen dat de vliegtuigen niet echt waren.
Hoeveel mensen moeten er bij jouw verhaal in het complot hebben gezeten?
Duizenden mensen zijn dood, maar jij loopt even doodleuk en arrogant te verkondigen dat ze fictief waren. Ga je ongelooflijk schamen!
Hoeveel mensen moeten er bij jouw verhaal in het complot hebben gezeten?
Duizenden mensen zijn dood, maar jij loopt even doodleuk en arrogant te verkondigen dat ze fictief waren. Ga je ongelooflijk schamen!
Het antwoord op de belangrijkste vraag van alle vragen? 42!
No - I think you have quoted incorrect figures.quote:
[..]
Jij vind 24000 gallons pretty much the same als 11000 gallons max capacity?
The planes were the same size, only the 767-200 is slightly lighter.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
He's talking about fuel tanks.quote:
[..]
No - I think you have quoted incorrect figures.
The planes were the same size, only the 767-200 is slightly lighter.
1 + 1 = blauw
Dat is juist het hele punt van de EXTENDED RANGE versiequote:
[..]
No - I think you have quoted incorrect figures.
The planes were the same size, only the 767-200 is slightly lighter.
De brandstoftanks zijn groter. Het vliegtuig zelf niet nee, alleen wat zwaarder.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
quote:
Dus volgens jou - eentje heeft 14,000 gallons gebruikt en de ander 1,400 gallons gebruikt.quote:
Voor de volledigheid, Flight 11 zat ongeveer op 10.000 vd 24.140 gallons. De bewering is ook niet dat deze fully fuelled was op het moment van impact. Voor de ander was dat 10.000 vd 11.489. Een stuk voller dan jij hier claimt dat mogelijk zou zijn.
They were both in the air for about the same amount of time.
I think you just made these figures up.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Which is what I corrected you on.quote:
[..]
Dat is juist het hele punt van de EXTENDED RANGE versie
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Again, waar zeg ik dat dan?quote:
[..]
[..]
Dus volgens jou - eentje heeft 14,000 gallons gebruikt en de ander 1,400 gallons gebruikt.
They were both in the air for about the same amount of time.
I think you just made these figures up.
You're just making this up.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Nee, je las weer eens niet goed wat ik schreef.quote:
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
In that case he should state fuel tanks and not vliegtuigen.quote:
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
quote:Op maandag 30 april 2018 13:50 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:
[..]
Nee, je las weer eens niet goed wat ik schreef.
quote:
[..]
No it's not. Kijk naar de kleinere van die twee 767's. Die zat op 90ish procent van total capacity.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
You should learn to read better in your own language or stop purposefully ignoring information that doesn't line up with your divergent worldview.quote:
[..]
In that case he should state fuel tanks and not vliegtuigen.
1 + 1 = blauw
Een tank van 11000 gallon is kleiner dan een tank van 24000 gallon...quote:
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Op donderdag 26 april 2018 01:03 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:quote:
[..]
Again, waar zeg ik dat dan?
Voor de volledigheid, Flight 11 zat ongeveer op 10.000 vd 24.140 gallons. De bewering is ook niet dat deze fully fuelled was op het moment van impact. Voor de ander was dat 10.000 vd 11.489. Een stuk voller dan jij hier claimt dat mogelijk zou zijn.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
En waar zeg ik dat de ene zoveel meer brandstof verbruikt heeft dan de andere?quote:
[..]
Op donderdag 26 april 2018 01:03 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:
Voor de volledigheid, Flight 11 zat ongeveer op 10.000 vd 24.140 gallons. De bewering is ook niet dat deze fully fuelled was op het moment van impact. Voor de ander was dat 10.000 vd 11.489. Een stuk voller dan jij hier claimt dat mogelijk zou zijn.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Dat kan je zien van je eigen cijfers.quote:
[..]
En waar zeg ik dat de ene zoveel meer brandstof verbruikt heeft dan de andere?
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
No.quote:
[..]
Jij vind 24000 gallons pretty much the same als 11000 gallons max capacity?
Waar haal je de 11,000 gallons vandaan? Volgens veel betrouwbaarder bronnen 't meer in de buurt van 17,000 is.
Yes I already know that.
Here is a comparison between the two types.
https://www.airlines-info(...)/Boeing-767-200.html
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
