BNW Brave New World
Samenzwering, verborgen agenda's en geheime geschiedenis. De zoektocht naar de wereld die achter de façade van alledag ligt.
Officiële verhaal + stats van het vliegtuig type.quote:Op vrijdag 27 april 2018 16:15 schreef Tingo het volgende:
[..]
Van waar heb je deze cijfers gekregen?
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Thats the maximum fuel capacity. 24,140Usgal / 91,380Lquote:
Voor de volledigheid, Flight 11 zat ongeveer op 10.000 vd 24.140 gallons. De bewering is ook niet dat deze fully fuelled was op het moment van impact. Voor de ander was dat 10.000 vd 11.489. Een stuk voller dan jij hier claimt dat mogelijk zou zijn.
A 767 has a range of about 4,000 miles at least. Boston to LA is around 2,500 miles so for such a flight, it would not be necessary or make any sense to have full tanks at take-off.
The fictitious 9/11 planes used only a third of passenger/baggage capacity so there would be even less fuel required for the flight.
The suggestion/assumption that the 9/11 fictitious jets were 'fully-laden' (even at take-off) is not only very misleading but also absolute bullshit.
It doesn't matter much anyway, but it's just another piece of nonsense in the silly 9/11 official storyline.
Ask the pilot
https://www.usatoday.com/(...)boeing-737/17036931/
Flight planning includes the fuel to fly from the departure airport to the destination, to an alternate if required, and to fly for 45 minutes. If holding is anticipated, then additional fuel is added. Every pound of fuel requires additional fuel to lift it, thereby adding cost to the flight.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Ah. So you basically made it up and therefore cannot provide an exact quote from any of the many, much more reliable sources than yourself. It seems like another good reason not to believe a fckin word that you have the shameless audacity to type.quote:
[..]
Officiële verhaal + stats van het vliegtuig type.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Hopelijk heb je 't nu ook zelf door dat je opmerking hier boven totaal onzin is.quote:
[
Helemaal 100% gaat niet werken nee, maar 100% min een beetje om van vliegveld naar toren te vliegen is toch niet zo gek?
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
quote:
[..]
Thats the maximum fuel capacity. 24,140Usgal / 91,380L
A 767 has a range of about 4,000 miles at least. Boston to LA is around 2,500 miles so for such a flight, it would not be necessary or make any sense to have full tanks at take-off.
The fictitious 9/11 planes used only a third of passenger/baggage capacity so there would be even less fuel required for the flight.
The suggestion/assumption that the 9/11 fictitious jets were 'fully-laden' (even at take-off) is not only very misleading but also absolute bullshit.
It doesn't matter much anyway, but it's just another piece of nonsense in the silly 9/11 official storyline.
Ask the pilot
https://www.usatoday.com/(...)boeing-737/17036931/
Flight planning includes the fuel to fly from the departure airport to the destination, to an alternate if required, and to fly for 45 minutes. If holding is anticipated, then additional fuel is added. Every pound of fuel requires additional fuel to lift it, thereby adding cost to the flight.
Jij moet echt eens leren om beter te lezen...quote:
[..]
Ah. So you basically made it up and therefore cannot provide an exact quote from any of the many, much more reliable sources than yourself. It seems like another good reason not to believe a fckin word that you have the shameless audacity to type.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Ah yes, your usual evasive, ignorant bullshit.quote:
[..]
[..]
Jij moet echt eens leren om beter te lezen...
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Het is nog steeds de waarheid. Je leest duidelijk erg slecht, en verzint van alles wat ik helemaal niet schrijf, of zelfs expliciet het tegenover gestelde over schrijf. Dus ja, leer alsjeblieft eens beter lezen.quote:
[..]
Ah yes, your usual evasive, ignorant bullshit.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Wrong.quote:
Op
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Wrongquote:
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Wrong.quote:
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Wrongquote:
Helemaal 100% gaat niet werken nee, maar 100% min een beetje om van vliegveld naar toren te vliegen is toch niet zo gek?
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Zelfs jouw eigen bronnen spreken je hierin tegen... En nee, dat is niet waar ik het hierboven over had. Kijk alleen al naar jouw onbegrip over brandstof in de vliegtuigen en zo. Je misrepresent daar op meerdere manieren wat ik er over schrijf.quote:
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
No it's not. Kijk naar de kleinere van die twee 767's. Die zat op 90ish procent van total capacity.quote:
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Helemaal geen bron.quote:
[..]
Officiële verhaal + stats van het vliegtuig type.
Je verzint maar wat.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Zegt wie?quote:
[..]
No it's not. Kijk naar de kleinere van die twee 767's. Die zat op 90ish procent van total capacity.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Nee dat zeg ik toch, is het officiële verhaalquote:
[..]
Helemaal geen bron.
Je verzint maar wat.
Zo moeilijk is dat toch niet om te begrijpen?
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Why would such similar flights (aircraft type,destinations, passenger and baggage on board) take-off with and then consume such different amounts of fuel?quote:
Voor de volledigheid, Flight 11 zat ongeveer op 10.000 vd 24.140 gallons. De bewering is ook niet dat deze fully fuelled was op het moment van impact. Voor de ander was dat 10.000 vd 11.489. Een stuk voller dan jij hier claimt dat mogelijk zou zijn.
Where exactly did you get the figures? I think you just made them up.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Because not all planes and not all flights are the same?quote:
[..]
Why would such similar flights (aircraft type,destinations, passenger and baggage on board) take-off with and then consume such different amounts of fuel?
Where exactly did you get the figures? I think you just made them up.
Wat is hier precies zo vreemd aan?
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Wrong again.quote:
[..]
No it's not. Kijk naar de kleinere van die twee 767's. Die zat op 90ish procent van total capacity.
De fictieve 9/11 vliegtuigen zelfde maat waren.
Eentje ietsjes lichter was.
Als we de officiele onzin verhaaltjes moeten geloven
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Wrong... Het waren voor de twee torens verschillende subtypes 767.quote:
[..]
Wrong again.
De fictieve 9/11 vliegtuigen zelfde maat waren.
Eentje ietsjes lichter was.
Als we de officiele onzin verhaaltjes moeten geloven
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
The fictitious 9/11 flights were pretty much the same.quote:
[..]
Because not all planes and not all flights are the same?
The flightplanners would know almost exactly how much fuel would be required for the trip. Why would they fill them to capacity and then let them fly with so much unused fuel on board? Thats not very cost efficient at all.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Pretty much is not the same.quote:
[..]
The fictitious 9/11 flights were pretty much the same.
The flightplanners would know almost exactly how much fuel would be required for the trip. Why would they fill them to capacity and then let them fly with so much unused fuel on board? Thats not very cost efficient at all.
1 + 1 = blauw
767-200 and 767-200ER are the same size.The 767-200 is just a few tons lighter.quote:
[..]
Wrong... Het waren voor de twee torens verschillende subtypes 767.
You obviously haven't read the specs and stats very well.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
