BNW Brave New World
Samenzwering, verborgen agenda's en geheime geschiedenis. De zoektocht naar de wereld die achter de façade van alledag ligt.
Just a few thousand kilo's? That's like nothing!quote:Op maandag 30 april 2018 13:32 schreef Tingo het volgende:
[..]
767-200 and 767-200ER are the same size.The 767-200 is just a few tons lighter.
You obviously haven't read the specs and stats very well.
1 + 1 = blauw
I want to ask you this nicely.quote:
[..]
Wrong again.
De fictieve 9/11 vliegtuigen zelfde maat waren.
Eentje ietsjes lichter was.
Als we de officiele onzin verhaaltjes moeten geloven
Can u stop saying that those planes were fake/fictive?
Het antwoord op de belangrijkste vraag van alle vragen? 42!
Same size planes, same destinations, same distances, roughly the same payload. There would absolutely no good reason to be at maximum fuel capacity at take-off for either flight.quote:
According to Hek and his magical figures (which he seems to have just pulled out of the air) - one of the fictitious planes used about 10 times as much fuel as the other.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Jij vind 24000 gallons pretty much the same als 11000 gallons max capacity?quote:
[..]
The fictitious 9/11 flights were pretty much the same.
The flightplanners would know almost exactly how much fuel would be required for the trip. Why would they fill them to capacity and then let them fly with so much unused fuel on board? Thats not very cost efficient at all.
Die brandstoftanks zijn meer dan twee keer zo groot man. De hoeveelheid brandstof aan boord hangt van zoveel factoren af, niet alleen van de vluchtduur.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
De brandstoftank ging het om... Die is meer dan twee keer zo groot voor de ER versie.quote:
[..]
767-200 and 767-200ER are the same size.The 767-200 is just a few tons lighter.
You obviously haven't read the specs and stats very well.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Waar zeg ik dat dan?quote:
[..]
Same size planes, same destinations, same distances, roughly the same payload. There would absolutely no good reason to be at maximum fuel capacity at take-off for either flight.
According to Hek and his magical figures (which he seems to have just pulled out of the air) - one of the fictitious planes used about 10 times as much fuel as the other.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Now you're lying again. You just pointed out some differences yourself, which you are now ignoring. All because you have this preconceived notion that any official story is a lie.quote:
[..]
Same size planes, same destinations, same distances, roughly the same payload. There would absolutely no good reason to be at maximum fuel capacity at take-off for either flight.
According to Hek and his magical figures (which he seems to have just pulled out of the air) - one of the fictitious planes used about 10 times as much fuel as the other.
1 + 1 = blauw
Een beetje een grote muil hebben over feiten en details, maar zelf steeds verkondigen dat de vliegtuigen niet echt waren.
Hoeveel mensen moeten er bij jouw verhaal in het complot hebben gezeten?
Duizenden mensen zijn dood, maar jij loopt even doodleuk en arrogant te verkondigen dat ze fictief waren. Ga je ongelooflijk schamen!
Hoeveel mensen moeten er bij jouw verhaal in het complot hebben gezeten?
Duizenden mensen zijn dood, maar jij loopt even doodleuk en arrogant te verkondigen dat ze fictief waren. Ga je ongelooflijk schamen!
Het antwoord op de belangrijkste vraag van alle vragen? 42!
No - I think you have quoted incorrect figures.quote:
[..]
Jij vind 24000 gallons pretty much the same als 11000 gallons max capacity?
The planes were the same size, only the 767-200 is slightly lighter.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
He's talking about fuel tanks.quote:
[..]
No - I think you have quoted incorrect figures.
The planes were the same size, only the 767-200 is slightly lighter.
1 + 1 = blauw
Dat is juist het hele punt van de EXTENDED RANGE versiequote:
[..]
No - I think you have quoted incorrect figures.
The planes were the same size, only the 767-200 is slightly lighter.
De brandstoftanks zijn groter. Het vliegtuig zelf niet nee, alleen wat zwaarder.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
quote:
Dus volgens jou - eentje heeft 14,000 gallons gebruikt en de ander 1,400 gallons gebruikt.quote:
Voor de volledigheid, Flight 11 zat ongeveer op 10.000 vd 24.140 gallons. De bewering is ook niet dat deze fully fuelled was op het moment van impact. Voor de ander was dat 10.000 vd 11.489. Een stuk voller dan jij hier claimt dat mogelijk zou zijn.
They were both in the air for about the same amount of time.
I think you just made these figures up.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Which is what I corrected you on.quote:
[..]
Dat is juist het hele punt van de EXTENDED RANGE versie
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Again, waar zeg ik dat dan?quote:
[..]
[..]
Dus volgens jou - eentje heeft 14,000 gallons gebruikt en de ander 1,400 gallons gebruikt.
They were both in the air for about the same amount of time.
I think you just made these figures up.
You're just making this up.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Nee, je las weer eens niet goed wat ik schreef.quote:
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
In that case he should state fuel tanks and not vliegtuigen.quote:
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
quote:Op maandag 30 april 2018 13:50 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:
[..]
Nee, je las weer eens niet goed wat ik schreef.
quote:
[..]
No it's not. Kijk naar de kleinere van die twee 767's. Die zat op 90ish procent van total capacity.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
You should learn to read better in your own language or stop purposefully ignoring information that doesn't line up with your divergent worldview.quote:
[..]
In that case he should state fuel tanks and not vliegtuigen.
1 + 1 = blauw
Een tank van 11000 gallon is kleiner dan een tank van 24000 gallon...quote:
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Op donderdag 26 april 2018 01:03 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:quote:
[..]
Again, waar zeg ik dat dan?
Voor de volledigheid, Flight 11 zat ongeveer op 10.000 vd 24.140 gallons. De bewering is ook niet dat deze fully fuelled was op het moment van impact. Voor de ander was dat 10.000 vd 11.489. Een stuk voller dan jij hier claimt dat mogelijk zou zijn.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
En waar zeg ik dat de ene zoveel meer brandstof verbruikt heeft dan de andere?quote:
[..]
Op donderdag 26 april 2018 01:03 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:
Voor de volledigheid, Flight 11 zat ongeveer op 10.000 vd 24.140 gallons. De bewering is ook niet dat deze fully fuelled was op het moment van impact. Voor de ander was dat 10.000 vd 11.489. Een stuk voller dan jij hier claimt dat mogelijk zou zijn.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Dat kan je zien van je eigen cijfers.quote:
[..]
En waar zeg ik dat de ene zoveel meer brandstof verbruikt heeft dan de andere?
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
No.quote:
[..]
Jij vind 24000 gallons pretty much the same als 11000 gallons max capacity?
Waar haal je de 11,000 gallons vandaan? Volgens veel betrouwbaarder bronnen 't meer in de buurt van 17,000 is.
Yes I already know that.
Here is a comparison between the two types.
https://www.airlines-info(...)/Boeing-767-200.html
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
quote:
Please explain the above figures.quote:Op donderdag 26 april 2018 01:03 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:
Voor de volledigheid, Flight 11 zat ongeveer op 10.000 vd 24.140 gallons. De bewering is ook niet dat deze fully fuelled was op het moment van impact. Voor de ander was dat 10.000 vd 11.489. Een stuk voller dan jij hier claimt dat mogelijk zou zijn.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
You should STFU or post something constructive or helpful to the 'discussion'.quote:
[..]
You should learn to read better in your own language or stop purposefully ignoring information that doesn't line up with your divergent worldview.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
In a word : No.quote:
[..]
I want to ask you this nicely.
Can u stop saying that those planes were fake/fictive?
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Are they? If you find the discussion here in any way offensive, may be it's not really the place for you to be hanging out.quote:
Een beetje een grote muil hebben over feiten en details, maar zelf steeds verkondigen dat de vliegtuigen niet echt waren.
Hoeveel mensen moeten er bij jouw verhaal in het complot hebben gezeten?
Duizenden mensen zijn dood, maar jij loopt even doodleuk en arrogant te verkondigen dat ze fictief waren. Ga je ongelooflijk schamen!
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
https://www.airlines-info(...)/Boeing-767-200.html
767-200 range 9000km.
767-200ER range 12000km.
Distance Boston to LAX rondom 4000km is.
Flightplanners weten ook hoeveel brandstof voor de vluchten nodig is, dus er geen goede reden is dat de fictieve 9/11 vliegtuigen fully-loaded zouden zijn. Daarom zijn er flightplanners die alles berekenen om de kosten zo laag mogelijk te houden.
The fully-loaded airliner lie is told to us to give the official storyline some kind of credibilty, spread by 9/11 propaganda mouthpieces such as Leslie Robertson - whom Hek tried to present to us as head designer, head structural engineer of the towers.
767-200 range 9000km.
767-200ER range 12000km.
Distance Boston to LAX rondom 4000km is.
Flightplanners weten ook hoeveel brandstof voor de vluchten nodig is, dus er geen goede reden is dat de fictieve 9/11 vliegtuigen fully-loaded zouden zijn. Daarom zijn er flightplanners die alles berekenen om de kosten zo laag mogelijk te houden.
The fully-loaded airliner lie is told to us to give the official storyline some kind of credibilty, spread by 9/11 propaganda mouthpieces such as Leslie Robertson - whom Hek tried to present to us as head designer, head structural engineer of the towers.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Fuel load at time of impact vs max capacity.quote:
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Weet je zeker dat die 11.489 gallons cijfer helemaal goed is ?quote:
[..]
Fuel load at time of impact vs max capacity.
I suggest you look up the specifications again.Kan je ook 'n goede reden geven waarom de fictieve 9/11 planes fully-loaded bij take-off waren en dus 3 of bijna 4 keer meer brandstof aan board voor zo'n destinatie nodig was?
Volgens sommige bronnen, beide 9/11 fictieve vliegtuigen 767-200ER's waren.
http://nymag.com/news/9-11/10th-anniversary/planes/
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Vis is hier prima welkom. Laat dit soort geneuzel maar achterwegequote:
[..]
Are they? If you find the discussion here in any way offensive, may be it's not really the place for you to be hanging out.
Ah die klopte inderdaad niet, had bij flight 77 (757-223) zitten kijken.quote:
[..]
Weet je zeker dat die 11.489 gallons cijfer helemaal goed is ?
Wie zegt dat dat het geval is?quote:Kan je ook 'n goede reden geven waarom de fictieve 9/11 planes fully-loaded bij take-off waren en dus 3 of bijna 4 keer meer brandstof aan board voor zo'n destinatie nodig was?
Jij suggereerde dat dat helemaal niet kon, waarop ik je corrigeerde.Nope:quote:Volgens sommige bronnen, beide 9/11 fictieve vliegtuigen 767-200ER's waren.
http://nymag.com/news/9-11/10th-anniversary/planes/
https://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=20010911-1
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
yes they are. It's not about being offensive, it's about being a complete asshole over the back of a whole lot of dead people and their families.quote:
[..]
Are they? If you find the discussion here in any way offensive, may be it's not really the place for you to be hanging out.
Against all evidence you choose to stay deaf and blind, and you make it about a very dumb conspiracy.
BNW or not, ireally hope youll never loose your kids in an event and that other clueless dumb people will say your kid was an actor or never existed.
Look I dont mind asking questions about this, but saying 911 never even happened is something that doesn't even need to be debunked if you have relatives dying in it.
Het antwoord op de belangrijkste vraag van alle vragen? 42!
Lekker wazig weer.quote:
Wie zegt dat dat het geval is?
Welke 'geval' heb je 't over precies?
Do you think the 9/11 fictieve vliegtuigen fully-loaded at take-off waren of niet?
Have you changed your mind?
Hoe precies denk je dat je mij 'çorrigeerde' heb?
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Neequote:
[..]
Lekker wazig weer.
Welke 'geval' heb je 't over precies?
Do you think the 9/11 fictieve vliegtuigen fully-loaded at take-off waren of niet?
Neequote:Have you changed your mind?
Jij claimde iets over hoeveel brandstof tijdens takeoff/climb gebruikt werd aan het begin van de vlucht, weet je nog.quote:Hoe precies denk je dat je mij 'çorrigeerde' heb?
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
I understand that for some people questioning the validity of victims is a sensitive subject.quote:
[..]
yes they are. It's not about being offensive, it's about being a complete asshole over the back of a whole lot of dead people and their families.
Against all evidence you choose to stay deaf and blind, and you make it about a very dumb conspiracy.
BNW or not, ireally hope youll never loose your kids in an event and that other clueless dumb people will say your kid was an actor or never existed.
Look I dont mind asking questions about this, but saying 911 never even happened is something that doesn't even need to be debunked if you have relatives dying in it.
Being oversensitive/sentimental and/or feeling emotionally involved with a certain subject will cloud rational thinking.
Is there any aspect at all about the 9/11official story that you have your doubts about?
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
I still say that it 'd be around 30%. You haven't posted anything at all to make me think otherwise.quote:
Jij claimde iets over hoeveel brandstof tijdens takeoff/climb gebruikt werd aan het begin van de vlucht, weet je nog.
You haven't corrected me about anything. You are nowhere near as clever as you like to think.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Grappig. You were the one making all the posts that referred to maximum fuel loads.quote:
Maybe you now understand that you were wrong but don't have the gonads to admit it because you have such a huge ego which you need to keep intact.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Grappig dat je die post van mij waar ik gelijk verduidelijk dat ik niet claim dat ze vol vertrokken zijn voor het gemak maar negeert. Dat moet ook wel, anders kan je dit denkbeeld niet in stand houdenquote:
[..]
Grappig. You were the one making all the posts that referred to maximum fuel loads.
Maybe you now understand that you were wrong but don't have the gonads to admit it because you have such a huge ego which you need to keep intact.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
En heb je zelf al enig bewijs voor deze claim, anders dan je duim?quote:
[..]
I still say that it 'd be around 30%. You haven't posted anything at all to make me think otherwise.
You haven't corrected me about anything. You are nowhere near as clever as you like to think.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Doe ff normaal, ik probeer je simpelweg aan te moedigen om de discussie niet uit de weg te gaan, welke reden je daarvoor ook moge hebben.quote:
[..]
You should STFU or post something constructive or helpful to the 'discussion'.
1 + 1 = blauw
I’ve given a ball-park figure from the info I have gathered from a few different forums/sites. I could be wrong of course.quote:
[..]
En heb je zelf al enig bewijs voor deze claim, anders dan je duim?
It’s general (interesting) info really and doesn’t have THAT much to do with 9/11. The point is, in reality, those flights would not have had so much fuel on board (9,000/10,000 gallons at impact according to the official fairy tale) and would not have even taken off with so much fuel on board as it would be well within their range to complete the flight to LAX with less .
You being an aviation, aerospace, aeronautical, enthusiast/plane-spotter type should be able to find more information quite easily.
And you seem to have much more time on your hands than I do.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Dus je hebt die bronnen, maar geeft ze gewoon niet? Klinkt alsof het uit een duim wordt gezogen. Is ook prima, kunnen we weer verderquote:
[..]
I’ve given a ball-park figure from the info I have gathered from a few different forums/sites. I could be wrong of course.
It’s general (interesting) info really and doesn’t have THAT much to do with 9/11. The point is, in reality, those flights would not have had so much fuel on board (9,000/10,000 gallons at impact according to the official fairy tale) and would not have even taken off with so much fuel on board as it would be well within their range to complete the flight to LAX with less .
You being an aviation, aerospace, aeronautical, enthusiast/plane-spotter type should be able to find more information quite easily.
And you seem to have much more time on your hands than I do.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Mensen, dit topic is door google geflagged als 'gevaarlijke of denigrerende inhoud'.
Verder niks, wilde alleen even melden hoe VOLKOMEN DEBIEL google is. Carry on
Verder niks, wilde alleen even melden hoe VOLKOMEN DEBIEL google is. Carry on
- Oh hi Mark!
- Cool... Cool, cool, cool.
Jayden, Ik mis mijn grote vriend...
Zie wat ik kijk: trakt.tv
- Cool... Cool, cool, cool.
Jayden, Ik mis mijn grote vriend...
Zie wat ik kijk: trakt.tv
Dan zijn we goed bezig.quote:
Mensen, dit topic is door google geflagged als 'gevaarlijke of denigrerende inhoud'.
[ afbeelding ]
Verder niks, wilde alleen even melden hoe VOLKOMEN DEBIEL google is. Carry on
Zeker volkomen debielquote:
Mensen, dit topic is door google geflagged als 'gevaarlijke of denigrerende inhoud'.
[ afbeelding ]
Verder niks, wilde alleen even melden hoe VOLKOMEN DEBIEL google is. Carry on
Thats fantastic news!quote:
Mensen, dit topic is door google geflagged als 'gevaarlijke of denigrerende inhoud'.
[ afbeelding ]
Verder niks, wilde alleen even melden hoe VOLKOMEN DEBIEL google is. Carry on
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
niks nieuws ......zuckerberg moet meer zn best doen....AIVD had ook zo'n lijst .............................
TTT [img]http://symboldictionary.net/library/graphics/symbols/tripletau.jpg[/img]
Δημοσθένης
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18FgnFVm5k0&fmt=37&hd=1&autoplay=1
Δημοσθένης
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18FgnFVm5k0&fmt=37&hd=1&autoplay=1
