[AMV] Amerikaanse verkiezingen 2016 #217 Jill Stein klinkt erg Duits

quote:

Op dinsdag 6 december 2016 10:52 schreef DeParo het volgende:

[..]

Indien Clinton had gewonnen en alsnog Michigan of Wisconsin had verloren dan had ze die staten ook niet opnieuw aangevraagd, Stein evenmin, dat lijkt me vrij logisch.

quote:

Madonna: Women voted for Donald Trump because they hate women
'Women’s nature is not to support other women. It’s really sad'

The Independent Online

Madonna’s reflections on the outcome of the US presidential election arrive at a stark conclusion: men look out for each other, but, fundamentally, women hate women.

The 42 per cent of female voters who walked into polling booths and chose Mr Trump were, for many, the hardest to process after his lewd, sexist and obscene comments and the accusations of sexual assault levelled against him, which he denied.

But the reason for this was simple for Madonna, who sounded uncharacteristically defeated when she spoke to Billboard about the result. “Women hate women. That’s what I think it is. Women’s nature is not to support other women. It’s really sad. Men protect each other, and women protect their men and children. Women turn inward and men are more external. A lot of it has do with jealousy and some sort of tribal inability to accept that one of their kind could lead a nation.”

The iconic singer was one of a number of high-profile voices to issue grim last minute warnings after polls began suggesting the prospect of a Trump administration was not as absurd as it once seemed.

Madonna compared her heartbreak over the election victory to suffering a bereavement, saying she has not had a fitful night’s sleep since. She also said her devastation over the results and her objections to Mr Trump had got her into a few arguments with people she knew who did vote for him.

Her outlook was bleak and one that is becoming increasingly familiar: “We’re f**ked”.

“We live in a country that’s run by ­bankers. In a way, it makes sense that Donald Trump is the president. Because money rules. Not intelligence, not experience, not a moral compass, not the ability to make wise ­decisions, not the ability to think of the future of the human race.”

http://www.independent.co(...)t&utm_medium=twitter

quote:

Op dinsdag 6 december 2016 17:57 schreef Ulx het volgende:
Trump wil de bestelling voor twee nieuwe Airforce One's die in 2024 moeten gaan vliegen annuleren twitterde hij terloops.

Boeing aandelen verloren direct 1% waarde. Ze zullen nu wel blij zijn in Seattle.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38221579

quote:

Op dinsdag 6 december 2016 17:59 schreef DeParo het volgende:

[..]

Huh? Clinton en Obama vier jaar geleden? Wat bedoel je?

quote:

Op dinsdag 6 december 2016 18:00 schreef Kansenjongere het volgende:

[..]

Het verschil tussen het aantal stemmen dat Clinton tot op heden heeft behaald en Obama vier jaar geleden.
In eerdere threads is nogal eens geroepen dat Clinton dit jaar miljoenen stemmen minder zou hebben behaald dan Obama vier jaar geleden.

quote:

Op dinsdag 6 december 2016 10:48 schreef DeParo het volgende:

[..]

De hypocrisie van Trump mag ook prima onderstreept worden, net als zijn leugens, mijn probleem is dat Stein en Clinton er ook in vervallen.

quote:

Op dinsdag 6 december 2016 10:48 schreef Ludachrist het volgende:

[..]

Ze accepteren de uitslag, maar de uitslag moet wel goed vastgesteld worden. Dat is iets anders dan 'ik zie wel of ik de uitslag accepteer'.

quote:

Op dinsdag 6 december 2016 17:57 schreef Ulx het volgende:
Trump wil de bestelling voor twee nieuwe Airforce One's die in 2024 moeten gaan vliegen annuleren twitterde hij terloops.

Boeing aandelen verloren direct 1% waarde. Ze zullen nu wel blij zijn in Seattle.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38221579

quote:

Op dinsdag 6 december 2016 18:00 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:

[..]

Heeft hij geen aandelen Boeing?

quote:

Op maandag 5 december 2016 17:49 schreef antiderivative het volgende:
Een aantal bezoekjes aan Trump Tower dinsdag:

Terry Branstad (Iowa Governor)
Muriel Bowser (DC Mayor)
Laura Ingraham (Radio host)
Rex Tillerson (CEO Exxon Mobil)
Masayoshi Son (CEO SoftBank Corp)

Zoals al eerder aangegeven, Branstad staat op de lijst om Ambassadeur in China te worden. Is bovendien een persoonlijke vriend van Xi Jinping.

twitter:

CNN twitterde op dinsdag 06-12-2016 om 19:42:36 Iran's President warns President-elect Donald Trump not to ruin agreement with the US https://t.co/0j7mMSdAzH https://t.co/9iWmx3AtVR reageer retweet

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op dinsdag 06-12-2016 om 20:09:49 Masa (SoftBank) of Japan has agreed to invest $50 billion in the U.S. toward businesses and 50,000 new jobs.... reageer retweet

twitter:

realDonaldTrump twitterde op dinsdag 06-12-2016 om 20:10:27 Masa said he would never do this had we (Trump) not won the election! reageer retweet

quote:

Op dinsdag 6 december 2016 18:56 schreef 99.999 het volgende:
Best bedrag maar het mooie is dat je nu al weet dat Trump ook deze belofte grotendeels zal breken. Immers, je weet dat er nieuwe vliegtuigen met zware eisen zullen moeten komen en gezien de mode van protectionisme zullen die echt niet bij pakweg Airbus besteld worden maar gewoon bij Boeing...

twitter:

ABC twitterde op dinsdag 06-12-2016 om 20:25:42 Trump announces that Masayoshi Son, CEO of SoftBank, has agreed to invest $50 billion in U.S., create 50K new jobs. https://t.co/NRYqaLHY4J reageer retweet

quote:

Op dinsdag 6 december 2016 20:48 schreef Nintex het volgende:

twitter:

ABC twitterde op dinsdag 06-12-2016 om 20:25:42 Trump announces that Masayoshi Son, CEO of SoftBank, has agreed to invest $50 billion in U.S., create 50K new jobs. https://t.co/NRYqaLHY4J reageer retweet

Nu met bewegend beeld. Trump harkt nu al bakken met geld binnen.

quote:

Trump’s Taiwan call wasn’t a blunder. It was brilliant.

President-elect Donald Trump (Mark Kauzlarich/Reuters)

By Marc A. Thiessen December 5 at 11:51 AM
Relax.

Breathe.

Donald Trump’s phone call with the president of Taiwan wasn’t a blunder by an inexperienced president-elect unschooled in the niceties of cross-straits diplomacy.

It was a deliberate move — and a brilliant one at that.

The phone call with President Tsai Ing-wen was reportedly carefully planned, and Trump was fully briefed before the call, according to The Post. It’s not that Trump was unfamiliar with the “Three Communiques” or unaware of the fiction that there is “One China.” Trump knew precisely what he was doing in taking the call. He was serving notice on Beijing that it is dealing with a different kind of president — an outsider who will not be encumbered by the same Lilliputian diplomatic threads that tied down previous administrations. The message, as John Bolton correctly put it, was that “the president of the United States [will] talk to whomever he wants if he thinks it’s in the interest of the United States, and nobody in Beijing gets to dictate who we talk to.”

Amen to that.

And if that message was lost on Beijing, Trump underscored it on Sunday, tweeting: “Did China ask us if it was OK to devalue their currency (making it hard for our companies to compete), heavily tax our products going into their country (the U.S. doesn’t tax them) or to build a massive military complex in the middle of the South China Sea? I don’t think so!” He does not need Beijing’s permission to speak to anyone. No more kowtowing in a Trump administration.

Trump promised during the campaign that he would take a tougher stand with China, and supporting Taiwan has always been part of his get-tough approach to Beijing. As far back as 2011, Trump tweeted: “Why is @BarackObama delaying the sale of F-16 aircraft to Taiwan? Wrong message to send to China. #TimeToGetTough.” Indeed, the very idea that Trump could not speak to Taiwan’s president because it would anger Beijing is precisely the kind of weak-kneed subservience that Trump promised to eliminate as president.

Trump’s call with the Taiwanese president sent a message not only to Beijing, but also to the striped-pants foreign-policy establishment in Washington. It is telling how so many in that establishment immediately assumed Trump had committed an unintended gaffe. “Bottomless pig-ignorance” is how one liberal foreign-policy commentator described Trump’s decision to speak with Tsai. Trump just shocked the world by winning the presidential election, yet they still underestimate him. The irony is that the hyperventilation in Washington has far outpaced the measured response from Beijing. When American foreign-policy elites are more upset than China, perhaps it’s time for some introspection.

The hypocrisy is rank. When President Obama broke with decades of U.S. policy and extended diplomatic recognition to a murderous dictatorship in Cuba, the foreign-policy establishment swooned. Democrats on Capitol Hill praised Obama for taking action that was “long overdue.” Former President Jimmy Carter raved about how Obama had “shown such wisdom,” while the New York Times gushed that Obama was acting “courageously” and “ushering in a transformational era for millions of Cubans who have suffered as a result of more than 50 years of hostility between the two nations.”

Here’s what President-elect Donald Trump has been doing after the election
View Photos Trump has been holding interviews and meetings as he prepares to transition into the White House.
But when Trump broke with decades of U.S. diplomatic practice and had a phone call with the democratically elected leader of Taiwan, he was declared a buffoon. Well, if they didn’t like that phone call, his critics may hate what could come next even more. Trump now has an opportunity to do with Taiwan what Obama did with Cuba — normalize relations.

There are a number of steps the Trump administration can take to strengthen our military, economic and diplomatic ties with Taiwan. My American Enterprise Institute colleague Derek Scissors has suggested that Trump could negotiate a new free-trade agreement with Taiwan. “Taiwan’s tiny population means there is no jobs threat,” Scissors says, but Taiwan is also the United States’ ninth-largest trading partner. A free-trade agreement would be economically beneficial to both sides and would send a message to friend and foe alike in Asia that, despite Trump’s planned withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the United States is not withdrawing from the region.

On the military front, Trump could begin sending general officers to Taipei once again to coordinate with their Taiwanese counterparts and hold joint military exercises. On the diplomatic front, Bolton says the new administration could start “receiving Taiwanese diplomats officially at the State Department; upgrading the status of U.S. representation in Taipei from a private ‘institute’ to an official diplomatic mission; inviting Taiwan’s president to travel officially to America; allowing the most senior U.S. officials to visit Taiwan to transact government business; and ultimately restoring full diplomatic recognition.”

Beijing would be wise not to overreact to any overtures Trump makes to Taiwan. When China tested President George W. Bush in his first months in office by scrambling fighters and forcing a U.S. EP-3 aircraft to land on the Chinese island of Hainan, its actions backfired. After the incident, Bush approved a $30 billion arms package for Taiwan, announced that Taiwan would be treated as a major non-NATO ally and declared that the United States would do “whatever it took” to defend Taiwan. His actions not only strengthened U.S. ties with Taiwan but also set the stage for good relations with Beijing throughout his presidency.

China does not want to make the same mistake and overplay its hand with Trump. Trump’s call with Taiwan’s president was a smart, calculated move designed to send a clear message: The days of pushing the United States around are over.

That may horrify official Washington, but it’s the right message to send.

https://www.washingtonpos(...)257442e0530#comments

quote:

In a statement, Boeing said: "We are currently under contract for $170 million to help determine the capabilities of these complex military aircraft that serves the unique requirements of the President of the United States."

twitter:

4evertruther twitterde op dinsdag 06-12-2016 om 23:02:30 @Cernovich Stand down orders on #Pizzagate are in process by Team Trump. Milo must have received call from Steven K. himself. reageer retweet

twitter:

jdelreal twitterde op dinsdag 06-12-2016 om 23:21:15 Oh the irony. @SenBobCorker, possible @realDonaldTrump Secretary of State, ***aims to expand NATO*** https://t.co/nys9LcTISA via @karoun reageer retweet

quote:

Op dinsdag 6 december 2016 21:03 schreef Nintex het volgende:
En Trump had gelijk over de kosten van Airforce One

[ afbeelding ]

Na de tweet vandaag

- Het kost maar 170 miljoen! <- Trump had gelijk, het gaat 4 miljard kosten
- Conflict of interest! <- Trump had al zijn aandelen al verkocht

quote:

Op dinsdag 6 december 2016 23:47 schreef 99.999 het volgende:

[..]

Joh, alles kan. Maar zie jij in Trump een man die in ouwe rommel door blijft vliegen? Dan mag Boeing die dingen voor een paar miljard renoveren. Linksom of rechtsom komt die investering er en breekt hij zijn belofte.

quote:

Op dinsdag 6 december 2016 23:50 schreef 99.999 het volgende:

[..]

Lees wel iets over een Japanse bank die vijftig miljard zou investeren. Ik zou er niet op gokken dat dit doorgaat. Maar wat is er met een Chinees bedrijf?

quote:

Op dinsdag 6 december 2016 23:50 schreef 99.999 het volgende:

[..]

Lees wel iets over een Japanse bank die vijftig miljard zou investeren. Ik zou er niet op gokken dat dit doorgaat. Maar wat is er met een Chinees bedrijf?

quote:

Op dinsdag 6 december 2016 23:59 schreef Kansenjongere het volgende:

[..]

Banken waren toch juist het grote kwaad als we de Trumpfans mochten geloven?

quote:

Op woensdag 7 december 2016 00:01 schreef Nintex het volgende:

[..]

Hier de powerpoint slide met de handtekeningen van Donald J Trump en de CEO van Softbank/Foxconn
[ afbeelding ]

Softbank is de eigenaar van Sprint een grote telecomboer in de VS