Netflix: Making a Murderer de bizarste serie die je ooit zult zien #2

quote:

Op vrijdag 8 januari 2016 20:12 schreef Scrummie het volgende:

[..]

Gebruik anders spoiler tags voor de zekerheid

quote:

Op vrijdag 8 januari 2016 20:27 schreef n00b13 het volgende:

[..]

Op mobiel. Dat wordt fijn...

quote:

Op vrijdag 8 januari 2016 21:01 schreef Rnie het volgende:
Ex-Boyfriend going wrong....punt.

[ afbeelding ]

quote:

Op vrijdag 8 januari 2016 16:33 schreef Karina het volgende:
Er komt een 'vervolg' op Investigation Discovery:

[..]

quote:

— Not only was the bullet found in the garage linked to Halbach’s DNA, but it was forensically tied to Avery’s gun as well. ...

— The criminal complaint claimed that authorities had found restraints — handcuffs and leg irons — at Avery’s residence. ...

— The infamous car key that was found in Avery’s residence had DNA of his sweat on it. ...

— Avery not only called Auto Trader and specifically requested Halbach to take pictures the day she was killed, but he also gave a false name when he did so. Why? ...

— Not only was Avery’s blood — which we’re supposed to believe was planted by the police after being extracted from an evidence room — found in six places on Halbach’s vehicle, but DNA from his sweat was also found on a hood latch. How did it get there?

quote:

1. Avery’s past incident with a cat was not “goofing around”. He soaked his cat in gasoline or oil, and put it on a fire to watch it suffer.

2. Avery targeted Teresa. On Oct 31 (8:12 am) he called AutoTrader magazine and asked them to send “that same girl who was here last time.” On Oct 10, Teresa had been to the Avery property when Steve answered the door just wearing a towel. She said she would not go back because she was scared of him (obviously). Avery used a fake name and fake # (his sister’s) giving those to the AutoTrader receptionist, to trick Teresa into coming.

3. Teresa’s phone, camera and PDA were found 20 ft from Avery’s door, burned in his barrel. Why did the documentary not tell the viewers the contents of her purse were in his burn barrel, just north of the front door of his trailer?

4. While in prison, Avery told another inmate of his intent to build a “torture chamber” so he could rape, torture and kill young women when he was released. He even drew a diagram. Another inmate was told by Avery that the way to get rid of a body is to “burn it”…heat destroys DNA.

5. The victim’s bones in the firepit were “intertwined” with the steel belts, left over from the car tires Avery threw on the fire to burn, as described by Dassey. That WAS where her bones were burned! Suggesting that some human bones found elsewhere (never identified as Teresa’s) were from this murder was NEVER established.

6. Also found in the fire pit was Teresa’s tooth (ID’d through dental records), a rivet from the “Daisy Fuentes” jeans she was wearing that day, and the tools used by Avery to chop up her bones during the fire.

7. Phone records show 3 calls from Avery to Teresa’s cell phone on Oct 31. One at 2:24, and one at 2:35–both calls Avery uses the *67 feature so Teresa doesn’t know it him…both placed before she arrives. Then one last call at4:35 pm, without the *67 feature. Avery first believes he can simply say she never showed up (his original defense), so tries to establish the alibi call after she’s already been there, hence the 4:35 call. She will never answer of course, so he doesn’t need the *67 feature for that last call.

8. Avery’s DNA (not blood) was on the victim’s hood latch (under her hood in her hidden SUV). The SUV was at the crime lab since 11/5…how did his DNA get under the hood if Avery never touched her car? Do the cops have a vial of Avery’s sweat to “plant” under the hood?

9. Ballistics said the bullet found in the garage was fired by Avery’s rifle, which was in a police evidence locker since 11/6…if the cops planted the bullet, how did they get one fired from HIS gun? This rifle, hanging over Aver’s bed, is the source of the bullet found in the garage, with Teresa’s DNA on it. The bullet had to be fired BEFORE 11/5—did the cops borrow his gun, fire a bullet, recover the bullet before planting the SUV, then hang on to the bullet for 4 months in case they need to plant it 4 months later???

quote:

Op vrijdag 8 januari 2016 23:41 schreef marcodej het volgende:
http://www.kratzlawfirm.com/

Huur mij in! Waarom?
"Successfully tried one of the largest and most complex homicide cases in Wisconsin history (State of Wisconsin v. Steven Avery)"

quote:

Op vrijdag 8 januari 2016 23:58 schreef GekkeGerrit- het volgende:
Toen Kratz in zijn slotpleidooi tegen de jury zei dat een stem voor 'onschuldig' zou betekenen dat ze dan ook vinden dat de Sheriff Department die moord op Therasa heeft gepleegd, had ik echt zin om mijn tv uit het raam te gooien.

Ook hoe hij op een van die persconferenties al genietend dat horrorverhaal van Brendan begon te vertellen... Wat een fucking creep. 100% zeker dat hij een erectie had op dat moment.

quote:

Op zaterdag 9 januari 2016 00:29 schreef SacreCoeur het volgende:
Ik weet nog niet helemaal wat ik ervan vind allemaal... ik neig naar onschuldig, maar de gevangenis maakt sowieso dik (jezus, toen Brendan verscheen in afl. 10 )

quote:

Op zaterdag 9 januari 2016 01:19 schreef MrSalazar het volgende:
Mensen welke dit n.a.v. DWDD gaan kijken.

quote:

Op zaterdag 9 januari 2016 01:19 schreef MrSalazar het volgende:
Mensen welke dit n.a.v. DWDD gaan kijken.

quote:

Op zaterdag 9 januari 2016 06:44 schreef OMG het volgende:

Wat ik dan weer niet begrijp is die groep internethelden die meteen voor het vrijlaten van die 2 zijn na het zien van een enigszins eenzijdige documentaire.

quote:

Op zaterdag 9 januari 2016 01:20 schreef n00b13 het volgende:

[..]

Wanneer was het? Ik las het in het AD en op nog een site.