Hopelijk het laatste Maddy McCann topic, maandag is d-day.

quote:

PJ admitted a simulation of the scenario

^{Dubbelklik op de afbeelding ivm scherpte}


The arrival of the dogs that detected cadaver odours and blood traces led the PJ to admit that some of the details where Maddie had been sleeping had been staged to sustain the abduction theory. One of the examples that were pointed out in one of the many reports that were written by the investigators was the fact that the soft toy was on the bed where Maddie slept, a bed that was partially undone. The animals detected odours on the child’s toy, but they did not mark her death on that spot. Which led the PJ to admit that Maddie had died in another area of the house, and then the toy was taken to the bed because it was the most likely spot in case of an abduction. Other details were analysed, like the fact that the furniture was too well positioned and the sofa was completely pushed against the wall.

Details

Investigated leads – The final report is clear. All the leads were investigated, the abduction theory was verified into detail. But the investigation’s main conclusions pointed towards the death of the child in the apartment, on the 3rd of May.

300 policemen were looking for Madeleine McCann during the first days. The PJ stresses that many among them spent several weeks sleeping only a few hours.

2000 diligences were made by the Judiciária during their search for Madeleine. International cooperation was requested on several moments, to exclude several cases of false sightings.

High costs – The PJ spared no costs throughout this investigation. Millions of euros were spent on the investigation into the disappearance, namely on the high payments that were made to the labs that collected the genetic profiles.

Suspicions – Dave’s involvement is considered again
Parents refused technical help

Works with endangered children and approached the McCanns in the Algarve. Found the behaviour strange

Yvone, who earned credentials from the English government to work in situations that involve endangered children, was in the Algarve when Maddie disappeared but the McCanns refused her help. The specialist told the PJ, during two depositions that were made one month apart from each other, that she approached the couple after the first few hours and that the behaviour from both left her with suspicions about their involvement in the disappearance.

The behaviour of David Payne, who was accused by a couple of doctors that spent holidays with him in 2005, of having attitudes that indiciated paedophile practices, also left Yvone intrigued. The McCanns’ friend had called them aside and advised them not to speak to the technician.

Yvone found another detail strange. David’s face was not unfamiliar to her, and the technician believes he might have been inquired before, within some case of sexual abuse. She tried to remember when but failed to locate moment and the circumstances under which she had met him.

The days went by and Yvone continued to think about the issue. She then sent a letter to the English police, where she pointed out the details that she had perceived. Namely, that the bedroom window had not been forced open, that it was not normal for a couple of doctors to leave their children alone and that Kate had reacted in an aggressive manner when she had approached her. She also alerted to the official statistics, that point towards the majority of these cases to involve a cover-up from the families.

Gonçalo Amaral’s book upsets the English

A delegation from the British justice left for London yesterday after having tried, in Portimão, to keep some details of the process under secrecy.

The English, who according to what CM was able to establish, are upset about possible revelations that the book from the former coordinator of the PJ in Portimão may make, tried to request the instruction judge to maintain the secrecy on the forensics reports about the blood traces and cadaver odour that were collected from the apartment at the Ocean Club, but also other parts from the process.

As far as CM was able to establish, the pretentions from the English delegation were denied, except in the case of the identity of persons that have condemnations or a police record of paedophilia which reside in the Algarve or were spending holidays in the region when the facts took place.

The British that were in Portimão are policeman Stuart Prior, one of the senior liaison officers with the Portuguese police, a magistrate and a jurist from SOCA, the British agency that specializes in investigation organized crime.

It is not known whether the trip was made under a rogatory letter or politically negotiated between the governments of both countries.

“In defense of my good name”

The book by Gonçalo Amaral is written in defense of his honour. “I felt the need to reinstate my good name, which was publicly rubbished while the institution that I belonged to for 26 years, the Polícia Judiciária, didn’t allow me to defend myself, or did so institutionally”, Gonçalo Amaral states in a text that justifies the book. In order to carry out that defense, he requested permission from the national directory but never obtained it. The book, which will be presented by Marques Vidal, a former director of the Judiciária, is launched on the 24th of this month, during a session that is scheduled for El Corte Inglés, in Lisbon. source: Correio da Manhã 19.07.2008, paper edition

quote:

Loose notes:

Laboratory | Decisive test – The final report ended up being decisive for the foreseeable archiving of the process. In that document, which CM revealed, the possibility of DNA contamination was admitted.

Archived | AG announced – The day after tomorrow, the AG will release a communication that will most likely announce the archiving of the process. The case will remain pending in Portimão’s Public Ministry, waiting for better evidence.

Reconstitution | Stopped – The reconstitution of the evening of the disappearance was a diligence that was seen as essential in the process. It was stopped because some of the McCanns’ friends did not accept to return.

Wardrobe | Odour detected – The English dogs signaled traces of Maddie’s death behind the sofa and in the bedroom wardrobe. On the bed, the animals didn’t detect anything.

Contamination | Traces – The authorities have no doubts that the contamination of the location made the investigation more difficult. During the first few hours, tens of people entered the bedroom.

Removed | By phone – Gonçalo Amaral was the target of various attacks and was removed by Alípio Ribeiro, by phone, after making a statement to a newspaper.

Letter | Paedophile register – Yvone, in the letter that she sent to the English police, wanted the authorities to verify whether Dave had a register of paedophile activities.

source: Correio da Manhã 19.07.2008, paper edition

quote:

Op zaterdag 19 juli 2008 14:57 schreef livelink het volgende:
Ik krijg als ik dit zo allemaal lees en vooral dan weer het nieuwe verhaal met betrekking tot David Payne heel sterk het gevoel dat er nog een enorme beerput aan ellende open moet komen. Je zou bijna zeggen dat alle indertijd aanwezige kinderen van de Tapas nagekeken zouden moeten worden op sporen van misbruik.

quote:

British don't want the disclosure of the identities of referenced for pedophilia, in the Algarve

The British police wishes to maintain confidential the names from a list of British citizens referenced for having pedophile practices, residing in the Algarve, that were identified during the Maddie’s case investigation. This list is part of the disappearing process of Madeleine Mccann whose archiving will be announced next Monday.

The maintenance of this list under confidentiality is one of the pretensions of the English police, under the argument that the divulgation of the identities of those individuals would be an intrusion in the domain of the private life.

Monday the General Attorney’s Office is going to release the final dispatch from the Public Ministry that decides on the archiving of Maddie’s case, for lack of evidence to sustain any accusation. With this dispatch, Kate and Gerry McCann (Madeleine’s parents), as well as the British citizen Robert Murat, will cease being arguidos.

The fact that the process may be archived, does not obviates that it may be re-open in the future. However, that would occur only if appear new elements of proof that invalidate the fundaments invoked by the Public Ministry, as it is established by the Penal Process Code, artº 279º.

The decision to archive may be appealed. Only when that timing is extinguished, will the process be open to the public.

[by] Amaral in book

Many details of the investigation may, however, become known before, through the reading of a book written by the inspector of Policia Judiciária (PJ) that leaded the investigation, Gonçalo Amaral, and that will be launched, next 24th in Lisbon.

At least, that is what the author promises, who ended up by being removed from the investigation, in the sequence of declarations considered offensive to the English police.

With the opening of the process, it will be possible to clear the doubts, to know what diligences were made, what was the level of the English police participation in the investigation and to know the real motives that took the police and Public Ministry to constitute Murat and the McCann couple, arguidos. It will be also possible to detect the incoherence’s and contradictions in the investigation, as well as the falsities that were divulged publicly.

There is also interrogations about the destiny of Paulo Rebelo, the coordinating inspector that replaced Gonçalo Amaral in Maddie’s case investigation, and on whom were put so many hopes of success.

Paulo Rebelo was installed in Portimão and surrounded himself with the best investigators of the PJ from all the areas. The effort was fruitless. Rebelo was unable to repair some errors committed on the initial phases of the investigation. He was also unable to advance for new leads.

With the conclusion of the case, Rebelo hopes that the PJ Directory decides quickly to substitute him in the direction of the department, in order to put him again, in Lisbon, in a place compatible with his curriculum.

by: Paula Torres de Carvalho (the journalist that also wrote " PJ admits hastiness in Madeleine McCann Case" - http://ultimahora.publico.clix.pt/noticia.aspx?id=1318465&idCanal=62

quote:

English defended the use of the dogs - Correio da Manhã

Traces – Finding the trail of a death changed the direction of the investigation



English defended the use of the dogs

An exhaustive report explains the possible scenarios to hide a body and defends the animals’ reliability

Mark Harrison, the English police who was designated to help the Polícia Judiciária in the search for Madeleine McCann, wrote a report last summer, in which he defended the usage of the dogs that are experts in the detection of cadaver odours and blood traces. The discovery of the residues and the signaling of the trail of a cadaver thus ended up formally changing the direction of an investigation that had been limited to the theory of abduction until then.

The report, which praises the Portuguese authorities’ work, suggested that the animals should be taken to all the locations where the body might have been hidden. From the apartment that had been rented by the McCanns up to the crèche, through the beach and the church area.



Mark Harrison explained that it was necessary to analyse the scenarios of Madeleine having been killed that night and her body abandoned by a person on foot or by car. The expert added that despite of the high costs of that search, it should be carried out in order to clarify the case.

Dogs are reliable

In the report, Mark Harrison says that it us very unlikely that the body was buried in the sand. The English policeman defends that a launch into the sea is the most likely scenario, while the body should also be searched for within an area of cliffs and dense bushes that lies east of Praia da Luz.

The two English dogs were presented as an indispensable help to the investigation, after their abilities and the manner in which they are trained were explained in detail, as well as the fact that they both react to blood traces and cadaver odours, without a single episode of “false positives” in the investigations.

In his report, Mark Harrison listed cases of success that offered a guarantee of reliability. And he asserted that if the dogs came to signal Maddie’s death, then it would be a fact.

Details

High costs - Mark Harrison stressed the high costs of the dogs. Their daily rate amounted to one thousand euros; the cost of the trip for them and their handlers was of 2750. There was also the cost of the passport for the animals (450 euros), adding to the lodging, the food and the transportation of the vehicles that were necessary for the animals.

False positives – Eddie, the dog that specialized in cadaver odour detection, has never given a false alert. He has participated in approximately 200 searches in homicide scenarios in Great Britain and never signaled any products that derived from meat or any other food item.

Human blood – Keela was trained exclusively with human blood; blood that is subject to strict testing and which comes from hospitals. She locates contaminated guns, smells vehicles and clothing items, and accurately detects residues, even if the locations are subject to cleaning.

Kate refused to answer the PJ

Kate refused to answer tens of questions from the Polícia Judiciária. After the first day of questioning, when she appeared in the company of her lawyer but was heard as a witness, Kate changed her stance. Being made an arguida and the fact that the authorities assumed that they admitted her involvement in the disappearance of her daughter Madeleine, led her to adopt a different attitude.

She refused to reply, for example, why she left the twins behind in the bedroom in order to call her husband and friends at the restaurant, after finding out that Maddie had disappeared.



She also failed to explain why she had not searched for her daughter in the first moments, sitting on the bed almost without moving, and she offered no explanation for the fact that the preliminary test results from the English lab detected traces in the car boot and behind the sofa, traces whose DNA resembled Maddie’s.

Other details from her personal and professional life remained unanswered. Kate refused, for example, to explain whether or not it was true that before the holidays she had admitted she had a bad premonition. Whether or not she had ever complained that the twins were very restless or had ever admitted to deliver the guard of Maddie to a relative.

Kate also remained expressionless when she was confronted with the possibility that she had quit working because she could not handle the pressure of raising he three small children.

She did not explain how the cadaver odour was found on her clothes and on the soft toy that was normally used by Maddie, or why the dogs marked the death inside the apartment.

Kate also chose not to clarify who had called Sky News, nor did she reveal whom she had called in the moments that immediately followed the disappearance.

In her deposition, Kate was also confronted with the fact that her refusal to make a statement might hinder the discovery of her daughter’s whereabouts. Nevertheless, she kept her silence.

Mother’s DNA on the window

The window had been forced open and the abductor had taken the child through it. That was the first possibility that was advanced by Kate to the authorities that collected residues on location. But the tests that were done at the IML [Portuguese forensics institute] ended up isolating just one DNA which did not belong to the child but rather to Kate. To the PJ, it is also practically impossible for anyone to carry the child out of that window, which does not even open completely.



Gerry accepted to speak to the police

On the day that he was made an arguido, Gerry accepted to answer all of the Judiciária’s questions.

Doubts about surveillance on the children

The PJ found contradictions in the friends’ testimonies concerning the manner in which the children were watched over.

Denied the use of sedatives on the children

Kate and Gerry have always denied to the PJ that they medicated the children or used any sedative to make them sleep. Maddie’s parents thus stated that their children went to bed early simply because they were used to that, and it was not even usual for them to wake in the middle of the night. CM knows that months after Maddie disappeared, Kate suggested to the Judiciária that the twins should be tested in order to find out whether they had been sedated that night. Something that the investigators found strange, given the fact that being doctors, they both knew that any residue would have disappeared by then. This was considered to be another indicator that Kate and Gerry were not telling the whole truth about what happened on the 3rd of May, hiding what had happened to the child.

Notes

Recorded | PJ taped action – The dogs’ search was recorded by the Polícia Judiciária. The handler also wrote an extensive report that translated the signs that had been detected by the animals during their search for traces.

TIR | English address – Kate stated her identity and her residence and gave her English address. Therefore, the return home was not considered to be an escape from justice.

Return | Postponed promise – When they returned home, the McCanns promised to return if it was necessary to make a statement. The reconstitution was requested, but the friends boycotted it. source: Correio da Manhã 20.07.2008, paper edition

quote:

Anyone Remember this Little Girl?

The Mccanns, Clarence Mitchell, Branson, Kennedy, Metodo 3, the Tapas 7, 8, or 9 should hang your heads in shame, you a the biggest bunch of spineless, arrogant, smug individuals that I have ever had to endure on the Tv and Media.

You have spent the last 14 months spewing your bile and contradictions to the entire world. Something happened on that night, the whole world knows that something happened, and not just that poor girls our disappearence.

Your are cool and calculated, you have shown and unbelievable lack of emotion. The silence of the Tapas Mooks is deafening, again, cool and calculating.

And today........... the news about Payne. I actually hope that this is not true, if it is, god help him. The story has overtaken what the ***k this case is all about, that little girl. But then the leak of Payne, I wonder, I just wonder where it came from.

My mother hit the nail on the head today. She said, in all her 74 years, in all the child abductions, she has seen on TV and in the Press, she said, ''the one thing that the parents do, is smell the clothes, the sheets, the toys of the missing girl or boy'' THEY DONT ****ING WASH THEM STRAIGHT AWAY. Now that is bizarre. Bizzare or Deliberate. Deliberate in my book.

They dont leave their children alone for 5 nights running, and then blame the British Public, because, 'everyone does it on Holiday' ..........its 'what you do'.............. You arrogant Bas*****. Dont try putting your Guilt that night, on the shoulders of the British or any other Nation.

Forget the DNA, forget the Police Files, forget your Holidays to Canada, forget Payne and his mates, what you have done over the last 14 months is try to offload your guilt that night, onto anyone that would listen. Anyone that would donate, put a poster up.

And finally to the little girl, who, through no fault of her own, has more than likely lost her life, due to your Neglect. Your Neglect, that regardless of the outcome on Monday, will stick with you and your cronies for the rest of your lives, you sad, sad apologies for something human.

Whether you like it or not, you are now the worlds biggest child neglectors. That is without question.

When you go to bed at night, just as you are dropping off to sleep, remember there is a child out there, that just wants to be cuddled and wrapped up warm...................and through no fault of her own, finds herself on the other side, lonely, sad and frustrated that her parents would rather fly to America, go to Canada, jogging, playing golf, walks in the park, than leave no stone unturned in the quest for her return, and all for the sake of the twins. Always for the sake of the twins.

Leaving no stone unturned. **** off. Liars the lot of you.

quote:

Evidence of death convinces the PJ but fails in court - Diário de Notícias

Tests. On the day before the likely announcement by the Attorney General of the archiving of the Maddie case, DN knows from sources that are close to the process that the analyses from hair that was found in the McCanns’ car revealed that 16 out of 18 markers match the child’s genetic information

Judge mistrusts evidence used in an isolated manner

Tests that were performed on hair that was collected from the boot of the car that was rented by the McCanns in the Algarve have determined that 16 out of 18 markers match Madeleine’s genetic information. The information, which was released to DN by a source from the PJ, joins the results in the preliminary report from the Birmingham lab, in England, where it is verified that “15 out of the 19 genetic markers that were found in a residue that was collected from the couple’s car boot are a match” with the child.

“The evidence is unequivocal for the investigators”, the PJ source guarantees. “We are talking about a tuft of hair that was found in the spare tire well, in the car boot, which could not have fallen from the siblings’ clothes or have ended up on that spot by other means. The issue is that in order to make a solid proof in court, one has to reach 18 markers. But with 16, the investigators have no doubts left”, the policeman recognizes.

But for a judge that was contacted by DN, there is no reason for such certainties. “It depends on which markers are missing and if I had to decide only with a basis on that element of proof, I would not take a case to court, because the chances for success would be very small. This type of evidence always has to be articulated with other elements.”

Another source that is well positioned near the process, and with forensics knowledge, sustains the PJ agent’s version by defending that “these tests are like the collection of fingerprints, where a piece of evidence in court needs to detect 13 points, but from 11 onwards the police is already certain”.

For DN’s source, the conclusions from the tests that were performed on the hair that was found inside the Renault Scénic that was used by the McCanns were not included in the PJ’s final report merely because “if the evidence was not going to be used in court, the police did not want the Public Ministry to say that there is a persecution of the child’s parents”.

Although he mistrusts this isolated type of evidence, the judge that was heard by DN argues that there is matter to take the parents of Maddie McCann to court. “They could be judged over the crime of endangering a minor, because leaving their daughter alone inside a hotel room while they go to dinner is not acceptable within the social patterns, and over obstruction of justice. It is better to remember that the child’s parents called the televisions before they called the police.” Source: Diário de Notícias, 20.07.2008

quote:

Op zondag 20 juli 2008 13:47 schreef kahaarin het volgende:
<knip>

Ik heb de commentaren van de journalist schuingezet, het leest nu wat makkelijker, vooral die link tussen Murat en Stagg vind ik interessant, het maakt blijkbaar niet zoveel uit of ze de echte dader hebben, een zwart schaap in de kudde die ze kunnen beschuldigen is genoeg, de dader is geidentificeerd en het leven kan gewoon doorgaan.
Ik heb het idee dat dit tov Murat is mislukt en dat die paranoia van nu komt omdat er geen 'dader' is gevonden en men dit dus gevoelsmatig niet heeft kunnen afsluiten. (Just my 2 cents. )

quote:

Dear Mr. Editor………

I’m quite sure that you are very busy, organising your hacks and other staff, clearing away space on the front pages of your newspapers to make way for tomorrows joyous headlines, not to mention the inevitable ‘’pull out and keep’’ 10 page insert guide, explaining the tragic chain of events that have had to be endured by Saint Gerry & Kate of Rothwell.

“Bungling/Boozy/Inept/ Sardine Munching Porto Plods finally admit defeat!!”, “The agony goes on for our Kate & Gerry” and “Vindicated at last!!”,

Just some, I am CERTAIN, of the headlines that we will all be reading about in the next couple of days. Readers will then be subjected to innumerable column inches over the coming weeks, with poignant articles from Richard Madely, Amanda Pearson, Carol Malone et al, explaining how they had all ‘been there’ for our illustrious golden couple, supporting them in their hour of need, joining forces to combat and admonish those ‘vile evil whisperings’ that were emanating along the corridors of certain internet forums and blogs.

No doubt, celebs’ agents are already in negotiation with tabloid editors, all lining up to prepare their clients to express their solidarity by way of ‘exclusive interviews’; “as a parent myself, I can’t imagine what hell they have had to go through………by the way, my new book, which is out this Monday……………………….”

Who knows?. Almost certainly an OBE or two will be in the pipeline, especially if the McCanns are allowed to take credit for the European ‘AMBER ALERT’.

Clarence Mitchell will almost certainly be given greater impetus, either directly or otherwise, to organise the Government’s Media Monitoring Unit, to clamp down and to CLOSE down those websites and bloggers that influence sufficient numbers of people to be potentially detrimental to New Labours diktats, (as he did the MIRROR Forum).

Tony ‘Glenda’ Parsons, will undoubtedly have accrued sufficient soundbites to keep his Mirror column going for the next 2 years.

But, Mr. Editor, just before you fall asleep at night in your bed, having finished the proof reading to your simpering, sycophantic, subservient homage to Clarence Mitchell’s release, please give a little thought to the following:-

Irrespective of what the Portuguese announce on Monday, the 20th July, there are a number of serious issues and questions which, FAR from being answered, have actually never been ASKED.

It may very well please you and whoever is dictating your editorial policy to perpetually vilify and BLAME the Portuguese authorities, their police or even their subjects for every aspect of the Madeleine McCann tragedy, but that would not explain, in any way, the following:--

The suspicions surrounding the McCanns and their possible involvement in the disappearance of their daughter arose, NOT because the Policia Judiciaria were inept and clueless, but because the McCanns made inaccurate statements, from the outset. Inaccurate statements about their movements, the movements of their friends, inaccurate statements about the state and condition of how they found the apartment and the shutters, inaccurate statements about what they discovered and discussed.

We know that they made inaccurate statements because what they said directly contravened and countered what the other stated, as well as what some of their friends stated. And they can’t ALL have been correct. Inaccurate statements, Lies or omissions?

Likewise, it wasn’t the ‘bungling Porto plod’ who strongly suspected or suggested that Madeleine may have died in the apartment.

It was a couple of British dogs. Specialist canines, who have a LONG and proven history and success rate in determining and locating the precise areas of residual tissue and and materials relating to cadavers. Specialist dogs who are currently proving to be both CRUCIAL and instrumental in unraveling the ongoing horrors being unearthed at Haut de la Garenne in Jersey.

Not, I am sure, that you will give much credence or space to their findings in Portugal, but HOW would you propose to explain away their behaviour in Praia da Luz, in the apartment, on Kate McCanns clothes and belongings? Having a bad day? Inconclusive? The fact that it is not wholly admissible in a Court of Law?

And what about that car boot sample? The Birmingham FSS, the acknowledged, finest Forensic science laboratory in the world? Martin Brunt is STILL on the Sky News website video, reporting a “100% DNA Match to Madeleine McCann”. Was he misinformed? Contaminated sample? Mistaken Process? Total fabrication? We may never know, especially given that the British authorities are fighting to ensure that particular aspect of this case remains secret. (Have you ever asked yourself why?, Mr. Editor, or are you simply not permitted to question Mr. Mitchells rhetoric?)

Are you also, Mr.Editor, going to lambast those bungling, inept, incapable LEICESTERSHIRE police, who were also widely reported as concurring, and in some cases even SUGGESTING, that Madeleine died in the apartment on that first night in May?

“ Licentious, lacklustre, Leicester Police loonies!” doesn’t quite have the same ring to it, does it Mr.Editor?

Friends in high places? Curious RICH associates and backers, underhand Government assistance? Prime Ministerial blessings, chats and advice?. Papal divine intervention, European and world leaders hob-nobs?. It’s all there Mr. Editor. Enough material to sell a billion Sunday journals. So why no interest?

You see, Mr. Editor; I don’t really know what happened in Praia da Luz in May of last year. I don’t know why, how or when. I wasn’t there. Neither were you. We can only listen to those that are either close to, or aligned to, the proceeding in question.

It boils down to who and what you want to believe. I am reminded of Herman Goering. He once stated, “it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy” How right he was.

I realised just how right he was when George Bush convinced the majority of his people that Saddam Hussein had a hand in 9/11, just before he embarked on the massacre of an estimated 600,000 Iraqi men, women and children, just so that Halliburtons could procure the rich oil fields; (FAT lot of good THAT did with the current oil price, but I digress.)

What I particularly hate about that atrocity, is that the British went ahead and held his hand while he did it. Only at least Blair gave the British people SOME credit. He knew we wouldn’t buy the 9/11 angle, so he made up the WMD’s story, inventing documents, dossiers and ‘intelligence’ as he went along.

“Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy”

Charles de Mendez? We would know for sure, exactly what happened to him, poor chap, were we to examine the countless surveillance video of the event. Except, for some reason, we can’t. Because the tape is apparently damaged or lost, or the cameras malfunctioned or were facing the wrong way or were broken or vandalised. Or all of the above.

And of course, when Neil Mackay sensationally reported in 2003 that “senior members” of the Labour Government were being investigated for “pedophilia and the "enjoyment" of child-sex pornography”, as part of the infamous ’Operation Ore’, Tony Blair very quickly and effectively served a DA NOTICE on the press and media, banning details of these matters being reported. A ban that still stands today. A sublime example of how a Government and its press can lie, mislead and fool its people.

“Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy”
So, you see, Mr. Editor. You will have to forgive me if I choose not to believe a single word that your paper publishes on the Madeleine Mccann case.

You will have to excuse me if I do not join in the rejoicing and celebrations when the illustrious couple are exonerated , nor contribute to their inevitable NEW fund to help them “find their daughter”.

Because, although it may be ultimately true that there is insufficient evidence to prove the culpability of the McCanns in the disappearance of their daughter, there is most definitely AMPLE and OVERWHELMING evidence that the authorities of this country do not wish for the truth to ever come out.

BUT; if there IS a god, and the leaders who presided over this debacle and cover up ever have to stand and atone before him, then rest assured that their minions:- the paltry, gutless, servile cowards who spread their lies and diktats in their respective newspapers, will have to atone also.

That’s YOU, Mr. Editor.

Perhaps you’d care to dwell on that point before you fall asleep tonight.

That, and the image of a precious, angelic and innocent little girl for whom, with your able assistance, Justice was denied

Godbless, Madeleine. Wherever you may be.

quote:

Rogatories – Judge didn’t validate the diary immediately

PJ wanted to hear the McCanns again

Today, the process is most likely to be archived. Ten months ago, the PJ asked for the reconstitution of the crime and a new questioning of the couple

Pinto Monteiro promised a solution for the Maddie case for today. The archiving of the process is most likely to be announced on the General Attorney’s Office’s website, after more than a year of an investigation that was made of breakthroughs and retreats.

The Judiciária lost some battles and diligences that were not carried out may have compromised the discovery of the truth. That is the understanding of Gonçalo Amaral, who launches the book ‘The Truth about the Lie’ next week, in which he promises to explain the reason why he believed in the child’s death and in the involvement of the parents in concealing the cadaver.

CM knows that Gonçalo Amaral was not alone in this fight. Only days after Kate and Gerry were questioned and after they returned to England, the PJ inspector who was in charge of the process defended that he wanted to hear the couple again and that they should be subject to a more serious coercion measure. He also requested the reconstitution of the facts.

In a dispatch that is dated September 19, Magalhães Menezes, a prosecutor of the Republic, manifested himself against it. He said it was an unnecessary diligence, because Kate had refused to answer and Gerry had clarified little or nothing.

Concerning the change in the coercion measures, he said there was no legal basis for any modification. The couple had given their English address when they were made arguidos, and remained available to be contacted at that residence.

Later on, when the PJ made the requests again, the magistrate ended up admitting to the new questioning. But he postponed the decision for a later moment in time, because he understood that hearing the friends and the numerous persons that the PJ had requested might raise new questions.

It should also be noted that the judge kept some reservations about the requests that were made by the Judiciária’s investigators. Concerning Kate’s diary, for example, the judicial magistrate argued that only later would it be possible to know whether it could be validated, because it revealed facts from Maddie’s mother’s private life.

Judge Pedro Frias refused the Public Ministry to access the text messages that were sent and received by Gerry McCann, alleging that the messages were telephone interceptions and that judicial authorizations could not be given after the occurrence.

Mysteries of the process

Investigating the friends – A strong suspicion, prompted by three testimonies, fell over one of the McCann couple’s friends. But that doctor returned to his country after the disappearance and he did not explain many of the questions for which the PJ had no answers. The Judiciária failed to understand his life story.

Reconstitution – Right after the interrogation of Kate and Gerry, the PJ requested the reconstitution of the facts. The English were asked to return to Portugal for the diligence to be carried out. Kate and Gerry ended up accepting, but the friends denied it. The Polícia Judiciária did not carry out the reconstitution and the archiving of the case, waiting for better evidence, renders the diligence useless.

Irishman not heard – An Irish citizen who stated he saw Gerry carrying a child on the evening of the 3rd of May should have been questioned again through a rogatory letter. But that was not fulfilled, and his deposition ended up not being obtained. What was known was that the witness made himself immediately available for a deposition.

Text message register – The PJ wanted to access the contents of the text messages that were sent and received by Gerry during the hours immediately before and after his daughter’s disappearance. The Public Ministry validated the request, but the judge did not defer the pretention, considering that it would be equal to listening operations. And that at that point in time, there was no judicial permission for them to be carried out.

Clinical records – The Public Ministry decided that the PJ should not access the clinical records of Madeleine and the twins Sean and Amélie. The prosecutor sustained that such would violate the privacy of the children and their parents, and the evidence might be considered null. For the magistrate, the request was not duly sustained, either.

To find out whether Dave saw Madeleine in the apartment

The last time that Maddie was seen by someone outside the group was at around 5.30 p.m. on the 3rd of May. After that, only David Payne asserts to have seen Maddie in the apartment, when he went there to exchange a few words with Kate. The PJ mistrusts that thesis and ends up having doubts about the time span of the disappearance. There are also contradictions about the time that Dave spent inside the apartment. Kate says they only exchanged two or three words, but Gerry guarantees that his friend stayed inside the house where his children were, for half an hour. The fact that three witnesses launch suspicions about Dave made it fundamental to clarify this situation.

Brother-in-law washed the car due to fish smell

Gerry’s brother-in-law was also heard in a rogatory letter. He was the usual driver of the Renault Scénic and he explained to the police that he had washed the car boot because one day he had perceived that fish blood had spilled from the bag that he had just acquired at the supermarket. Alexander also added, in April this year, when he was questioned by the investigators, that one day he had noticed a strange smell in the car. But he guaranteed that was due to the fact that they usually transported waste in the car boot. He also said that the twins’ nappies were usually placed there, and that was the reason for the intense smells.

Trip to London without results

It was the last great hope for the investigation. Already in the possession of the final documents from the English lab, which launched strong doubts and rendered the results from the residues that were found inside the car that was rented by the McCanns 22 days after Maddie disappeared inconclusive, the Polícia Judiciária from Portimão made themselves available to watch the questioning of the McCanns’ friends. Paulo Rebelo, who had substituted Gonçalo Amaral, and two other investigators went to Leicester, but returned empty-handed.

It was in April this year and the hearings were held at the English police’s headquarters, a few kilometers from the couple’s house. But the witnesses added little or nothing and in many moments pointed towards what they had already told the Portuguese authorities after the disappearance. The PJ’s final report, which is most likely to prompt the dispatch for archiving by the Public Ministry today, reinforces just that and it is ultimately accepted that the investigation has reached a dead end.

Many situations remain unclear, namely how it was possible for Jane Tanner to have seen a man carrying a child while Gerry, who was standing two or three metres away, saw nothing; and how an abductor could have carried a child horizontally, through a small window that only half opened.

Notes

Teachers | Heard – The PJ heard Madeleine’s teachers through a rogatory letter. They guaranteed that Madeleine was happy with the McCann couple and that there had never been any incident.

Mitchell | Guaranteed innocence – Clarence Mitchell, the couple’s spokesman, was questioned on the 28th of April. He guaranteed that he had accepted to work with the McCanns because he had believed in their innocence. source: Correio da Manhã, 21.07.2008, paper edition

quote:

Op maandag 21 juli 2008 13:17 schreef kahaarin het volgende:

[..]

Goedemorgen Suko en de rest!

Wachten duurt lang......

Waarschijnlijk heb je gelijk wbt team McCann, het wachten is op de eerste Clarrie spin in de Britse media en op de Portugese kranten....
[..]

http://www.iht.com/articl(...)gal-Missing-Girl.php

quote:

Op maandag 21 juli 2008 14:45 schreef kahaarin het volgende:

[..]

Inderdaad zeg, ik dacht dat je in eerdere posts over die snifferdogs had staan dat vergissen heel weinig voorkwam? Natuurlijk net nu.....

quote:

Madeleine police inquiry shelved

The investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann has been shelved. Portugal's attorney general Fernando Jose Pinto Monteiro has told police to halt their inquiry. He also confirmed that suspect status has been lifted from the child's parents and a third British national, Robert Murat.

Madeleine, of Rothley, Leicestershire, disappeared from her holiday apartment in Portugal on 3 May 2007, aged three.

'Most important'

Portuguese media had previously reported that the 14-month long investigation would be closed because of a lack of evidence. Detectives submitted their final report at the start of July to prosecutors.

Kate and Gerry McCann, Madeleine's parents, have said they want their own private investigators to see detectives' files so they can keep looking for their daughter. Mr and Mrs McCann's spokesman, Clarence Mitchell, said the couple would not comment in advance of the attorney general's official statement. He added: "Obviously they are aware of numerous reports suggesting that the case is about to be shelved.

"If that is the case they hope that it is made very clear that their arguido status is revoked and they hope to gain access to the police files so that their private investigators can continue the search for Madeleine. "At the end of the day that is the most important thing - finding their daughter and keeping the search going."

Last week Mr Murat received a £600,000 settlement and apology after a libel claim over allegations in 11 UK newspapers. In March Mr and Mrs McCann reached a libel settlement and got an apology from Express Newspapers for suggesting they were responsible for her death.

The McCanns and Mr Murat both strongly denied any involvement in Madeleine's disappearance.

'Good job'

In an interview with the BBC, Goncalo Amaral - the former police chief leading the Madeleine inquiry - said he believed she was dead. "The evidence that we had gathered by the time that I left the case pointed to the girl being dead - and having died inside the apartment," he said.

"I don't know what happened next, I can't say. We'll have to wait for the case files to be made public." Mr Amaral was removed from the case last October after reportedly criticising the British police. He is now publishing a book about the investigation and denied that Portuguese police had failed to carry it out properly.

"Let's wait, and people will see that the Portuguese police and the British police did a good job - because various British agencies were involved. "We tried and we worked hard, so we can't be accused of incompetence or failure."

Mr Amaral also insisted that despite them being made formal suspects, there was "no persecution" of the McCanns. "The police don't want to persecute anyone - just to investigate what happened in a given case," he said.

quote:

PRESS RELEASE

I
By the dispatch with today's date (21.07.2008) emmitted by the two magistrates of the Public Ministry competent for the case, it was decided the archiving of the inquiry related with the disappearance of the minor Madeleine McCann, for not having been obtained proof of the practice of any crime by the arguidos.

II

The condition of arguido of Robert James Queriol Evelegh Murat, Gerald Patrick McCann an Kate Marie Healy cease here, being declared extinct the coertion mesures superimposed to them.

III

There may be place to hierarchic appeal, a request to the opening of the instruction or the re-opening of the inquiry process, if requested by who has legitimacy t do it.

IV

The inquiry may be re-opened by the initiative of the Public Ministry or at the request of someone interested if new elements of proof emerge that may originate serious, pertinent and consequent diligences.

V

After the legal timings are passed, the process may be consulted by any person that reveals to hold a legitimate interest in it, as long as all the formalities imposed by law are observed.

Lisboa, 21 de Julho de 2008

The Press Office

Ana Lima

Leave comments to the Attorney General here: http://www.pgr.pt/english/index.htm

quote:

I sincerely wish Mr Amaral every success with his book. Does anyone know if it will be translated into English?

Mr Mitchell’s statement that others are making money out of Madeleine’s name could be classed as hypocritical considering the McCanns have announced forth coming movies, books and a substantial payment for an interview with Oprah Winfrey once their Arguido status is lifted. And they are still looking into new ‘solutions’ – according to yet more ‘close friends’ the McCanns may look into Mr Amaral’s book in the hope of finding something within its pages to sue the author.

Mr Mitchell had previously suggested that any monies from Mr Amaral’s book should be donated to the McCann fund – why on earth would he do that? Surely it should go towards his retirement? The McCanns have hauled in enough money through the public’s kindness and through suing British newspapers yet they still have not shown any proof that any of the fund money has gone towards finding Madeleine; still they have not released any audits to show exactly where the money donated by the public has been spent and still they are looking to build more through any means available.

What has struck me throughout the case is that the McCanns have not contributed anything themselves, the very people who say they are doing everything they can to (apparently) find Madeleine. Mr Mitchell goes on about the fund drying up and thrusting the begging bowl under the public’s noses as if he believes that the average person (who probably earns a mere pittance in comparison to the McCanns and Mr Mitchell) has an endless stream of money to give away to a fund that has not, as yet, been proven to be going towards ‘finding Madeleine.’ If they want the public to continuously donate money that they can probably ill afford, then surely the McCanns should have the decency to release audits of where, exactly, the fund money has so far been spent. What’s more, if they are so concerned about the fund running out then isn’t it about time that they showed willing and sold their house, down-sized and put their own money into the ‘find Madeleine Fund’?

Considering how the McCanns have acted, Is it any wonder that people are repeating their words “we are doing everything we can to find Madeleine” then adding “as long as it’s with someone else’s money”

So who, exactly, is making money out of whose name?

quote:

Op maandag 21 juli 2008 21:05 schreef kahaarin het volgende:

[..]

Bah,bah, ik denk dat je gelijk hebt, Clarrie zal dit zien als overwinning en proberen dit om te buigen alsof de McCanns eigenlijk vleugeltjes zouden moeten hebben en een gouden harpje......
[..]

Natuurlijk, de zaak zit op slot en er moet zo veel mogelijk geld uit gehaald worden, die documenten zijn wellicht cruciaal voor de publieke kijk op de zaak, ik ben er ook niet meer zo zeker van dat dit enkel de getuigenverklaringen van de eerste periode waren, ze waren er zo op gebrand dat ik begin te denken dat dit de belastende verklaringen waren, nogmaals een klap in het gezicht van de PJ, dit had natuurlijk nooit in de handen van de, toen nog wel, verdachten mogen komen.
[..]
Jee Kahaarin, daar zit wat in, tuurlijk ziiten er heel belastende verklaringen in en mogelijk nog wat uitslagen van het een of ander....
Het enige wat die zegt is dat er geen bewijzen zijn, niet meer en niet minder, bewijzen verzamelen was hem ook bijna onmogelijk gemaakt, kijk maar eens naar wat er is gebeurd met die rogatory letters en de statements die van geen kanten aansloten maar die hij ook nooit heeft kunnen checken allemaal, team McCann zag het nut er niet van in om die reconstructie te doen immers.
[..]
Yep, nogmaals, niet meewerken loont kennelijk, dat begrihp ik ook nog steeds niet. Die vrienden waren dan wel geen formeel verdachten maar het moge duidelijk zijn dat ze geen klap hebben uitgevoerd enig zicht in de zaak te krijgen en te helpen Madeleine te vinden, integendeel zou ik zeggen.
Ik maak me sterk dat als die dossiers vernietigd moeten worden er heus wel sources close to er de hand op weten te leggen, ik kan me niet voorstellen dat ze dit gewoon maar allemaal bij het vuilnis zetten, dit is te groot om onder het tapijt te vegen.
[..]
Nou ja, niet bij het vuilnis, dat ook nou weer niet, maar mogelijk in een kluis of zo, maar vermoedelijk heeft Correio da Manhã nog wat liggen, die krant heeft kennelijk heel veel materiaal in handen zoals we konden lezen....
Tja, hard maar waarschijnlijk waar, poppetje......
[..]

De Portugezen hoeven zich nergens voor te schamen, degenen die dat wel zouden moeten doen hebben het te druk met vingerwijzen en beschuldigen, dat boek is imho echt 1 van de laatste mogelijkheden om enigzins een beetje licht op de zaak te werpen.

quote:

Op maandag 21 juli 2008 21:22 schreef livelink het volgende:
Een zaak 'gewonnen' en een kind verloren...., ik weet niet wat ik er van moet zeggen of denken. Kennelijk hadden teveel mensen iets te verliezen en was het daarom zo moeilijk om te achterhalen wat er nou precies is gebeurd op 2 of 3 mei. Ik hoop dat ooit iemand toch gaat praten, of zou dat ijdele hoop zijn?

quote:

Op maandag 21 juli 2008 21:54 schreef kahaarin het volgende:

[..]

Het is heel wrang dat het hier gewoon op neerkomt idd, ook dat Suko gewoon gelijk heeft wat betreft tear yerkers en Clarrie spin, hopelijk heb je niet net gegeten want dit artikel is echt misselijk makend....
[..]

http://www.monstersandcri(...)spects__2nd_Roundup_

Ondanks alle vows en tears staan de agony en pain van de ouders vooraan in de statements, hoe durf je over je eigen sores te zeuren als je kind weg is en je zelf hebt bijgedragen aan de verdwijning door te gaan zitten zuipen met je vrienden terwijl je kids moederziel alleen in een open appartement liggen, ik weet het, mijn plaat loopt vast en ik heb dit al ik weet niet hoe vaak gezegd maar kom op zeg, het is toch te erg dat mensen die hun kinderen achterlaten om te gaan feesten zo'n ontzettend podium krijgen om hun jankverhalen en beschuldigingen te uiten, in 1 woord walgelijk......

quote:

Op maandag 21 juli 2008 21:40 schreef voyeur het volgende:
De vraag is wat er erger is. Dat Madeleine verwaarloosd en wel op geheimzinnige wijze gedood is of het volstrekt falen van de normale rechtsgang. Het eerste is een gruwelijk incident, het tweede suggereert dat een armer EG land onder grote druk gesteld door cynische mensen niet in staat is recht te doen gelden. Ik zal de komende tijd nog vaak denken aan deze zaak en welk aspect nu het meest afgrijselijk is.

Enfin op naar Ophrey en het grote cashen. Ouders overal ter wereld trek lering uit dit verhaal en dump de lastpak in Portugal voor grotere roem en massa's geld. Arme Madeleine geeft volgens haar moeder nog steeds haar twopence worth aan haar 'abductors', maar haar ouders doen het natuurlijk niet voor zulke kleine bedragen.

quote:

Op maandag 21 juli 2008 22:39 schreef kahaarin het volgende:

[..]

Ik moest me gewoon even afreageren, ik heb de NewsNow site dichtgegooid en kijk er niet eerder weer naar dan morgen, I promiss.

quote:

Op maandag 21 juli 2008 23:00 schreef Suko het volgende:

[..]

Heel verstandig....

Interessant: "Pinto Monteiro was faced with choosing between bringing charges in connection with Madeleine's disappearance, closing the case or asking the police to continue investigating". The Gaurdian

What was wrong with exercising the first option? Bron

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> The REAL Madeleine McCann Story by SPUDGUN <<<
^{Nieuws/info is te lezen op o.a.Three Arguidos Forum + Joana Morais + mccannfiles}

quote:

’Onthullingen’ zaak-Maddie

LISSABON, maandag
Het voormalige Portugese hoofd van het onderzoek naar de verdwenen Madeleine McCann presenteert deze week zijn boek over de zaak en kondigt explosieve onthullingen aan.
Juist vandaag sluiten de Portugese aanklagers de zaak van het vorig jaar verdwenen Britse meisje waarschijnlijk wegens gebrek aan bewijs.
Ex-onderzoeker Goncala Amaral, die in oktober van de zaak werd afgehaald, belooft aanstaande donderdag echter met „explosieve onthullingen” te komen. Vooral over de rol van de Britse politie zou hij het nodige hebben te melden. Hij gelooft dat Maddie niet meer leeft.

quote:

Op dinsdag 22 juli 2008 00:29 schreef schatje het volgende:
Ook in de (papieren) Telegraaf aandacht voor het aanstaande boek van Goncala Amaral.
[..]

bron

quote:

The PJ refuse to abandon the Maddie case in spite of the, "McCann case."
SOS Madeleine McCann 21/07/08 (vertaling )

The PJ are not ready to abandon the investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann in spite of the announcement from the office of the Attorney General of the Republic (PGR) that the process would be archived. The Portimao Department of Criminal Investigation (DIC) of the PJ which has investigated Madeleine's disappearance, "is going to be strengthened briefly," a police source confirmed in statements to the Lusa agency.

According to the same source, the strengthening of the resources of the Portimao PJ is intended to cope with the possibility of new leads or sensitive details to be analysed within the framework of the Maddie case. The National Directorate of the PJ, led by Almeida Rodrigues, gave instructions about the way in which every lead in connection with the Madeleine case, "is immediately investigated."

The decision of the Public Minister (MP) to archive the investigation into Madeleine McCann's disappearance and to lift the arguidos status of the parents, Kate and Gerry McCann, was not greeted with suprise by the PJ investigators or the British police: one of the investigators affirmed, "having been the victims of an agreement which goes over their heads and which does not take account of the interests of the victim, Maddie."

"The Maddie case has become the McCann case, we have gone from a police investigation to a case of political protection and manipulation of the law," a British police officer accuses in statements to SMM. Duarte Levy & Paulo Reis

quote:

Madeleine Cops File Leaked On Web Sky News
Madeleine Files Leaked

Breaking News10:06am UK, Tuesday July 22, 2008
Martin Brunt, Crime correspondent, in Praia da Luz

Kate and Gerry McCann have to wait a week to see the police files on the Madeleine case, but a summary has already been leaked to a Portuguese website. It explains why the couple were made arguidos... because of the "scent of death" detected by the cadaver dog and their own reluctance to answer police questions.

According to the leak, the dog found the smell of a corpse in the couple's bedroom at apartment 5a and behind a sofa in the living room. The dog detected the same on Madeleine's soft toy Cuddle Cat and on the key fob in the family's hire car.

The police report says the couple were made arguidos "due to the slight possibility of connection to a corpse".The second animal - a blood dog - found traces of Madeleine's blood behind the couch, on two items of Kate McCann's clothes and on the key fob and in the car boot, according to the leak.

It also says there was a DNA match to Madeleine's on samples taken from the car but later forensic results did not confirm that initial finding. Robert Murat was made a suspect after a British Sunday newspaper reporter gave his name to police because of his "inquisitive" behaviour.

Suspicions were fuelled by friends of the McCanns who claimed he helped in the search for Madeleine on the night she vanished, contradicting his alibi that he was at his nearby home with his mother all night. The report says detectives found no one else who saw him on the night and telephone wires and searches provided no evidence of his involvement.

In a fascinating glimpse of the kind of information fed to police, one witness said he had overhead Gerry McCann talking into his mobile phone in nearby Lagos and saying "please don't hurt Madeleine". Detectives did cell site analysis on Gerry's phone and established he was elsewhere at the time. The witness was wrong.

quote:

Op dinsdag 22 juli 2008 12:47 schreef kahaarin het volgende:
Goeddemiddag!

Ik ben weer kalm, ik heb dit zelfs kunnen lezen zonder dat mijn bloeddruk steeg, de McCanns willen de PJ aanklagen, ze zijn zo boos omdat ze arguido zijn gemaakt:
<knip>

Nou ben ik heel benieuwd of ze dit uit het Maddy-fund willen betalen en wat de reactie van de geldschieters zal zijn, dit heeft imho niets te maken met de zaak, niets te maken met Madleine maar met hun eigen gram halen, laten ze dat geld gebruiken voor de zoektocht naar Maddy ipv hun lelieblanke achterwerken schoon te praten.
Ze zijn zelf immers echt niet van alle smetten vrij.

Ik heb trouwens zo maar een ideetje, zou het kunnen zijn dat als ze veroordeeld waren voor neglect, ze dan niet meer veroordeeld kunnen worden voor de eventuele verdwijning? Je kunt natuurlijk niet voor verwaarlozing met de dood tot gevolg worden veroordeeld en daarbovenop voor dood door schuld.
De zaak ligt alleen maar op de plank totdat er nieuw bewijs is, niet meer en niet minder, als er nieuw bewijs komt bovendrijven kunnen de McCanns alsnog opgepakt worden, als ze al schuldig waren bevonden niet meer natuurlijk.

Suko had wel gelijk dat er nu in de eerste tijd na de statements van de PJ de McCanns een nieuwe campagne aan het voeren zijn om er zelf beter uit te zien, een 'wronged couple'.......

quote:

July 23, 2008 - 00:30 am Pre-publication
"Madeleine died in apartment''
The 'CM' begins to be published today, exclusively excerpts from the book of Gonçalo Amaral, who believes that Madeleine McCann died in apartment in Praia da Luz The episode of holidays of 2005, in Majorca - they are raised suspicions about a friend the couple - and the results of DNA are the first excerpt.

Madeleine Beth McCann, with 2 ½ years, and their twin brothers at the time with few months old, departing on vacation in the company of parents to the island of Majorca. Together with three other couples they go to doctors with their children. [...] SG had attended the University of Dundee, between 1987 and 1992, there has known the future mother of Madeleine. KG only came to know Gerry McCann in this marriage with Kate Healy, around 1998, in Liverpool. After that event, the couple SG KG and become close friends of the parents of Madeleine and is a regular, passing week-end together, maintaining contact by phone.

In the third or fourth night in Majorca, after dinner, eating and drinking, when they were seated around a table in a courtyard outside the house, KG attends a scene that has caused fear for the welfare of her daughter and other children. She was seated between Gerry McCann and David Payne, when he heard the latter ask if she, perhaps referring to Madelein, would do 'this', starting in the act following a suck their fingers, which hinders the mouth and rising, suggesting a fálico subject, while with the fingers of the other hand, formed circles around the nipple, as a provocative and sexual. At a time when KG looked with amazement to Gerry McCann and David Payne, it was made a nervous silence. After all the talk continued as if nothing had happened. This episode caused KG in a serious doubt about the relationship of David Payne with children. In yet another occasion, KG would see David Payne to make the same gestures, this time speaking of their daughter. In that period of leave were the parents who gave bath for children, but from there KG never left the David Payne closer to their daughter. After these holiday in Majorca, KG only found the couple David and Fiona Payne on one occasion, not talking to them since then.

[...] What is written above was reported on May 16, 2007, only thirteen days after the disappearance of Madeleine English to the police, the couple SG and KG It was an important and relevant information for research.. However, nothing was sent to the Portuguese police.

[...] I believe that only after my departure of research, perhaps in late October 2007, is that the testimony of KG has been referred to the Portuguese police. With legitimacy question is: which is why the British police Tuesday, apparently, hidden evidence that during six months? When they heard that David Payne, organizer of the trip to Majorca, and who were reported abnormal behaviour in dealing with children, was the same which organised the trip to Portugal, which was part of the group of the holiday village of Luz where Madeleine was part, that was the first friend of the family to be seen next to Kate McCann after the disappearance of the child (as we shall see below) and that the date of the testimony was still in Portugal and may be confronted with these statements?

"[...] In the first days of September, just days before the constitution and accused the couple McCann, the Superintendent Stuart Prior, goes to the Portimão. It brings with it a preliminary report [of the forensic laboratory in Birmingham], coming discuss the status of the investigation with us. In a meeting with the investigating team Portuguese and English, in our office, Stuart shows up disappointed with the results of the examinations. It starts here the saga of the reports of the FSS. We read the report and we do not agree with the disappointment of Stuart. They are concerned the traces collected blood on the floor, behind the couch of the apartment 5A, as well as traces of blood recovered boot of the car used by McCann. We talk about blood traces (blood) because the dog is trained CSI only to detect that body fluid. The reports to support decision-making, prepared by specialists Mark Harrison and Martin Grime, are clear: the dog CSI was used to locate human blood. The Low Copy Number, technique used to determine the DNA of those samples, does not determine that body fluid comes from the DNA. In the first case, you can read that which obtained a result of incomplete DNA, for little information in the sample, giving indications of low-level DNA from more than one person . But all components of DNA confirmed coincide with the corresponding components of the DNA profile of Madeleine!

The second case, after an explanation of the components of the DNA profile of Madeleine, concluding that it is represented by 19 alleles, it appears that 15 are present in the sample examined. In other words, there are 4 components to have a 100% conclusive result. According to the experts that laboratory, those 15 have not arrived to finish with a great degree of certainty, that this was the DNA profile of Madeleine, because the Low Copy Number 37 components found in the sample. There 37 components because at least three individuals contributed to this result. Despite having been found 15 components of the DNA profile of Madeleine, the result was considered complex.

But it turned around here this first preliminary report. In it, the scientist has been careful to explain that abnormal in many of the profiles of the experts of the laboratory are present elements of the DNA profile of Madeleine. In other words, much of the DNA profile of any one person can be constructed by three donors. The first two issues have arisen. The first: to that served in terms of criminal evidence, a profile of DNA, if it can be a combination of three or more donors.

Another question was simple: why is that the DNA profile of those three donors contributed to 15 components of the DNA profile of Madeleine and not by any other person, for example, of the scientist who carried out the examination? But the surprises of the preliminary reports would not be here. [...]

WHAT THE BOOK ON BEHALF OF EX-POLICE

Gonçalo Amaral decided to write the book to recover its freedom of expression. Away from research by Alípio Ribeiro, the former coordinator of PJ of Portimão believe Madeleine McCann died in the apartment of the Ocean Club on the night of May 3, 2007. And also believes that parents simulated the abduction and hid the corpse of her daughter, after a tragic accident inside the apartment.

WAR OF DIRECTORS

The national director of PJ, Almeida Rodrigues, said yesterday that his predecessor, Alípio Ribeiro, "nãos if notabilizou for being a good researcher He said once the criticism made by Alípio the closing of the case Maddie, considering it was "too early for most."

Tomorrow: Get to know some more hot spots of the book which tells another version of the investigation and that MCCann did not want to see published. Leia a entrevista com o autor. Read the interview with the author.

quote:

Op woensdag 23 juli 2008 11:27 schreef kahaarin het volgende:
Goedemiddag, nou ja bijna dan.

Ik denk Suko dat als Amaral dit niet kan bewijzen hij ongelofelijk in de knoei zit, ik hoop echt dat hij dit kan hard maken.
Joana is echt goed bezig met die mooie rijtjes en vertalingen, het zaakje stinkt echt, dit is geen oplossing maar een overgave van de PJ, ik denk dat men zich heeft gerealiseerd dat de ge-eikte paden volgen geen zin heeft want team McCann heeft alles compleet dichtgetimmerd.

En dan dit:

http://www.yorkshirepost.(...)t-leaked-.4314557.jp
[..]

Goh, tjonge jonge, uit wiens pen zou dit gekomen zijn?
Ik denk dat ze weer een deal gaan sluiten en alle gegevens zonder slag of stoot in hun schoot geworpen krijgen, vervolgens kan die rechter die vriendin is van Kate alle stukken die mogelijk kwaad kunnen onder de 'bescherming' van Madeleine nav haar ward of court status gooien en niemand krijgt er ooit iets van te zien.
Amaral zal wel een boete krijgen en het boek verboden worden, presto, je kinderen alleen achterlaten in een hotel, lekker gaan feesten en er 1 kwijtraken heeft geen gevolgen als je maar rijk en invloedrijk genoeg bent.......

quote:

2 – Area of the backyard, close to the apartment 5A:
- cadaver odour dog:
* in a flowerbed, commented by the dog handler the lightness of the scent detected;

3 – Apartments where the rest of the elements of the group stayed
* NOTHING was detected by any of the dogs;

4 – House of the McCanns at the date of the inspection [second apartment]
* NOTHING at the house was detected by any of the dogs;

5 - In the area of Vila da Luz
* NOTHING was detected by any of the dogs;

6 – In the clothes and belongings of the Family MCCANN
- cadaver odour dog:
* in two pieces of clothing belonging to KATE HEALY
* in a piece of clothing of the minor MADELEINE
* in the plush toy, possibly belonging to MADELEINE (it was detected cadaver odour, when the plush was inside the residence – at the date occupied by the family)

7 – In the vehicle used by the MCCANN family
- cadaver odour dog:
* signalled the key of the vehicle;
- blood dog:
* signalled the key of the vehicle;
* signalled the interior of the vehicle’s boot;

8 – In the vehicle used by a friend of the family, who stayed in the same resort, matching some of the holiday days.

quote:

“The Truth of the Lie”: Release of Gonçalo Amaral’s Book on the Maddie Case with Hot Revelations

The book “The truth of the Lie" , which promises controversial revelations on the Maddie case, is launched tomorrow. The SIC reveals today the first excerpts. The work has the signature of the man who directed great part of the investigations but ended up being removed. The lawyer of the couple McCann, Rogério Alves, said to the SIC that he does not comment fiction.

Gonçalo Amaral says that he wants “to put back the good name that was vilified in the public domain" without the Judicial Police allowing his own defence.

In the first pages of the work, the author highlights since then the unusual treatment given to the couple McCann, which in the words of the inspector were treated with "tweezers".

Much was spoken also about the attitudes of Gerry and Kate McCann and Gonçalo Amaral reports several situations in which he found the coldness of the couple strange facing the tension of the investigations.

In one of the situations the inspector speaks about the mother of the child, Kate, who before the possibility to find the daughter appears bothered with the speed reached by the car of the police. [This was after a new information of a possible sighting of Madeleine was given to the police, the mother instead of being anxious looked annoyed with the entire situation]

In another case it was the father who aroused the attention of the inspectors: in the middle of a negotiation, with a possible kidnapper, the doctor “was sucking casually one lollipop while reading banalities in sites of the Internet and talking about rugby and football with one of the English police officers.”

Gonçalo Amaral believes that : "Madeleine died in the apartment 5A of the Ocean Clube, on the 3rd of May of 2007, but he does not discard the hypothesis of having been accidental."

Contacted by SIC, Rogério Alves, he refused to comment on the book by Gonçalo Amaral. “While lawyer of the family McCann, I only comment reality, I do not comment fiction", said the lawyer.

Excerpts of the book “The Truth of the Lie"

P. 11
“This book appears out of the necessity that I felt of putting back my good name that was vilified in the public domain without the PJ has allowing me to stand up for myself ”.

P. 19
“The mistake was that we treated the couple 'with tweezers'. They were treated with privileges. It is that, that is not normal”.

P. 26
“It seems that the Judiciary Police is a ‘stepmother’ [Portuguese expression, meaning the PJ as an institution was never good to its officers] with its servants, it never knew how to defend them ”.

P. 38
“It was pertinent to know if Madeleine was the biological daughter of the couple McCann, the information requested does not arrive, but the English ambassador is already arriving. It is not normal this preoccupation of the English diplomacy ”.

P. 48
“A hand print was found in the balcony window at the rear [of the apartment]. It was corresponding to one of the police elements ”. (protocol of proceedings is lacking)
(Joana legt uit: "means that the police did not get the concept of a scene of crime, they didn't use the regular procedures, like gloves, etc... which are generally used in a murder scene - no wonder anyway- the kidnap theory was the theory pushed forward even before the police arrival. It was the former British Ambassador who called the former director of the PJ pressuring the theory of abduction - that was the obliging hypothesis until the PJ Inspector coordinating the case found that it was impossible to have had occurred a kidnapping."

P. 54
Sightings:
“Kate appears bored because of having being obliged to return and bothered with the speed reached by the police car We found strange that she didn’t show signs of hope with the possibility of the girl being recovered ”.

P. 67
“The PJ should have had persons to analyse all the news, being preoccupied by what the parents and friends would say to the public opinion. What did not happen ”.

P. 68
“It is not usual that common citizens, to whom a daughter just had disappeared, nominate press advisers”

P. 71
“The English service secret already had, after the facts, the couple and the group of friends under surveillance. If that was right such an information was never accessed by the Portuguese police”

P. 81
“The medical registries (of Madeleine) requested with insistence were not given to us, due to great difficulties raised in England”.

P. 92
Attempt of extortion
"Gerry McCann was sucking casually one lollipop while he was reading banalities in sites of the Internet and was talking about rugby and football with one of the English police officers.”

Sentence of the English police officers “Do not forget that he starts cutting people in half shortly afterwards of the breakfast”.
(Joana legt uit: "as a surgeon he cuts people - it's a way of trying to explain is coldness and apathy and uninterest in the situation of extortion that was happening. a parent would not be doing this but we are talking about people who jogged and laughed, and slept all night without trouble.)

P. 165
“There were signs of death in the apartment. It was concluded that that cadaver odour could only came from Madeleine McCann”.

P. 168
“The toy had cadaver odour”

P. 214
Conclusions
“Madeleine died in the apartment 5 A on the 3rd of May of 2007
A simulation of kidnapping took place
Kate and Gerry are suspected of corpse's occultation [hiding the cadaver]
The death might have happened as a result of an accident
There are signs of negligence in the safe keeping and security of the children”
Source:SIC