Waar blijven de Epstein files? #2

quote:

Op maandag 22 december 2025 14:09 schreef Beathoven het volgende:

[..]
Laten we eens hypothetisch aannemen dat alles wat je uitkraamt waar zou zijn. Dan zit je zogenaamd Clinton te verdedigen door dat dossier niet te willen openbaren.

Ik ben van mening dat het hele dossier iets van de DOJ is en onder de democraten zou de federale overheid zich nooit op een ander vlak begeven dan het eigen. Maar we zitten hier met een Maga dat de muren tussen verantwoordelijkheden heeft weggeslagen voor autocratie en sterke beloftes aan het volk heeft gedaan. De Epsteinfiles zouden worden vrijgegeven.

En ik heb hier nog nooit zoiets beroerds als een soort BNW-orc als poortwachter gezien, die zo bezig was met argumentatie vinden in waarom hij 'niet' wil dat een beloofd dossier op straat komt. Dus je maakt het allemaal wel heel bijzonder met je verdediging.

quote:

Op maandag 22 december 2025 19:08 schreef Beathoven het volgende:

[..]
Matt Gaetz?

De Matt Gaetz die een meid onder de 18 een beugel "cadeau" gedaan heeft in ruil voor seks en journalistje speelt voor het witte huis?

Die vindt jij ethisch gezien een goede keus?

Het gaat er niet om hoe jij persoonlijk iets wilt zien. Het gaat erom dat men "volledige openheid van zaken" beloofde bij aanvang en geen enkele openheid geeft. De poppetjes die eromheen willen dansen boeit niemand wat. De slachtoffers weten wat er gebeurd is en de wereld heeft recht op openheid.

Ontsleutelen die handel.

quote:

Epstein bragging to Norwegian politician Thorbjan Jagland about advising the Russians on how to deal with Trump: "It's not complex. He must be seen to get something. It's that simple."

quote:

Thorbjørn Jagland (Drammen, 5 november 1950) is een Noors politicus en lid van de Arbeiderspartij. Van 1992 tot 2002 was hij voorzitter van de Arbeiderspartij, van 1996 tot 1997 premier, en minister van Buitenlandse Zaken van 2000 tot 2001. Van 2005 tot 2009 was hij voorzitter van het Noorse parlement.

Jagland was van 1 oktober 2009 tot 18 september 2019 secretaris-generaal van de Raad van Europa en van 1 januari 2009 tot 3 maart 2015 voorzitter van het Noors Nobelcomité, dat de Nobelprijs voor de Vrede toekent.

quote:

In 2020, after initially denying contact with Epstein, Jagland acknowledged that Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Gates visited his residence in Strasbourg on March 27, 2013. That meeting is not mentioned in the Epstein-files. On November 13 this year, Jagland told NRK that he had contact with Epstein in order to learn about Donald Trump, and that the contact was of a normal diplomatic nature.

The matter will be followed up in a new article when additional Epstein files are published later this week.

1. Indication of a possible meeting prior to January 27, 2013

In January 2013, Epstein mentions Thorbjørn Jagland’s name in an email exchange with a contact. This contact replies that he recalls having met Jagland at what he refers to as Epstein’s place, without specifying which of Epstein’s properties. Epstein owned residences in New York, Palm Beach, and on an island in the Caribbean. Reference: Instance 1.

2. Indication of a possible cocktail party in September 2014

In September 2014, Jagland is supposed to have attended a cocktail party hosted by Epstein in New York. Reference: Instances 2, 3, and 4.

3. Indication of a possible meeting in February 2017

In February 2017, an email exchange between Jagland and Epstein indicates that Epstein planned to travel by train to Strasbourg in order to meet Jagland. Reference: Instance 7.

4. Indication of a possible stay in or before April 2017

In April 2017, an email exchange between Jagland and Epstein refers to a meeting that appears to have taken place over several days, which Jagland describes as wonderful and thanks Epstein for having done so much for them (who “them” refers to is not specified). Epstein apologizes for having to cut the stay short abruptly. Jagland asks for another meeting when Epstein next comes to Paris. Reference: Instance 8.

5. Indication of a possible meeting in June 2017

In June 2017, Epstein writes in an email to a contact that one of the following individuals will stay overnight with him in Paris: Jagland, Lavrov, or Putin. The sentence lacks punctuation, making it unclear which of them is meant, but it appears to point to Jagland. Eleven days later, in a new email, Jagland thanks him for a lovely evening. Reference: Instances 10 and 11.

6. Indication of a possible meeting in New York in September 2018

In an email in June 2018, Jagland writes that he will be at the “UN” during “high-level week,” which may refer to the annual meeting of the United Nations in New York in September 2018. On September 9, 2018, Epstein writes in an email to a contact that Thorbjørn Jagland will give a country-to-country briefing on the 23rd, if the contact would like to. Reference: Instances 11 and 12.

https://samfunnogpolitikk(...)rey-epstein-meetings

quote:

Facing contempt of Congress, the Clintons’ lawyers made an untenable offer: that I travel to New York for a conversation with President Clinton only. No official transcript would be recorded and other Members of Congress would be barred from participating. I have rejected the Clintons’ ridiculous offer.

The Clintons’ latest demands make clear they believe their last name entitles them to special treatment. The House Oversight Committee’s bipartisan subpoenas require the Clintons to appear for depositions that are under oath and transcribed. Former President Clinton has a documented history of parsing language to evade questions, responded falsely under oath, and was impeached and suspended from the practice of law as a result.

The absence of an official transcript is an indefensible demand that is insulting to the American people who demand answers about Epstein’s crimes. As part of our investigation, the House Oversight Committee has released transcripts of interviews with former U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr and former U.S. Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta, which has provided much needed transparency to the public. Without a formal record, Americans would be left to rely on competing accounts of what was said.

Former Secretary Clinton’s on-the-record testimony is necessary for the Committee’s investigation given her knowledge from her time as Secretary of State of the federal government’s work to counter international sex-tracking rings, her personal knowledge of Ms. Maxwell, and her family's relationship with Mr. Epstein.

Contempt proceedings begin tomorrow.

quote:

Everyone is frustrated because they want to see the Epstein files and I do too, but here are the facts:

As of today, the DOJ has completed a review of over 5 million documents, conducted by over 500 attorneys, and they are ready to be released NOW.

However, Obama appointed Judge Paul Engelmayer has ordered a SECOND review of those documents and is now requiring certification of those documents by U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton, while simultaneously blocking the appointment of a special counsel. This is causing MAJOR delays.

I will be bringing forward a bill to IMPEACH Judge Engelmayer for obstructing the release of the Epstein files and failure to appoint special counsel! Release the files!