[AMV] #1021 Hondse Reps en Kattige Dems

quote:

Op woensdag 1 februari 2023 22:09 schreef MoreDakka het volgende:
Grappig, want CRT is juist geschrapt uit een AP curriculum. Dat is dan maar goed ook he.

quote:

Op woensdag 1 februari 2023 22:13 schreef Kijkertje het volgende:

[..]
CRT is niet geschrapt uit een een AP curriculum, het hele curriculum is geschrapt omdat er een paar zgn 'CRT' elementen in gevonden zijn.

quote:

After heavy criticism from Gov. Ron DeSantis, the College Board released on Wednesday an official curriculum for its new Advanced Placement course in African American Studies — stripped of much of the subject matter that had angered the governor and other conservatives.

[..]

David Coleman, the head of the College Board, said in an interview that the changes were all made for pedagogical reasons, not to bow to political pressure. “At the College Board, we can’t look to statements of political leaders,” he said. The changes, he said, came from “the input of professors” and “longstanding A.P. principles.”

[..]

He said that during the initial test of the course this school year, the board received feedback that the secondary, more theoretical sources were “quite dense” and that students connected more with primary sources, which he said have always been the foundation of A.P. courses.

[..]

The expunged writers and scholars include Kimberlé W. Crenshaw, a law professor at Columbia, which touts her work as “foundational in critical race theory”; Roderick Ferguson, a Yale professor who has written about queer social movements; and Ta-Nehisi Coates, the author who has made the case for reparations for slavery. Gone, too, is bell hooks, the writer who shaped discussions about race, feminism and class.

quote:

Op woensdag 1 februari 2023 22:18 schreef MoreDakka het volgende:

[..]
Dat is onjuist.

https://archive.ph/1DsBc#selection-720.0-720.5
[..]
Dus geen CRT in high school, daar kunnen we allemaal voor zijn toch?

quote:

Op woensdag 1 februari 2023 22:25 schreef Kijkertje het volgende:

[..]
Nou nee. Je kan het oneens zijn met bepaalde onderwerpen, het is nog steeds geen CRT.

quote:

Op woensdag 1 februari 2023 22:27 schreef MoreDakka het volgende:

[..]
Niet meer nee. Zoals je kunt lezen is die troep niet door te komen. Maar goed dat het geschrapt is, toch?

quote:

The subjects are no longer part of the exam, and are simply offered on a list of options for a required research project.

And even that list, in a nod to local laws, "can be refined by local states and districts."

quote:

Op woensdag 1 februari 2023 22:28 schreef Kijkertje het volgende:

[..]
Weet je over welke onderwerpen het ging? En waarom is het goed dat die geschrapt werden?

quote:

Op woensdag 1 februari 2023 22:32 schreef MoreDakka het volgende:

[..]
Dat staat gewoon in het artikel. Maar ben je voorstander van CRT op high school of niet? Het argument was altijd dat het niet gegeven wordt omdat het 'universitair' is.

quote:

“DeSantis likes to make noise and he’s running for president,” Mr. Finn said. “But they’ve been getting feedback from all over the place in the 60 schools they’ve been piloting this in. I think it’s a way of dealing with the United States at this point, not just DeSantis. Some of these things they might want to teach in New York, but not Dallas. Or San Francisco but not St. Petersburg.”

quote:

Op woensdag 1 februari 2023 22:40 schreef Kijkertje het volgende:

[..]

Ik ben ervoor om studenten op de hoogte te brengen van ALLE visies dus ook CRT wat niet inhoudt dat de universitaire studie (wat CRT is) daar onderwezen wordt.

quote:

Net als je de slavernij -periode moet kunnen bespreken
wat niet inhoudt dat je racisme onderwijst. Waarom zou je het niet mogen hebben daarover?

quote:

Op woensdag 1 februari 2023 22:42 schreef MoreDakka het volgende:

[..]
Wel dus. En daarom is het ook geschrapt, het is niet door te komen. Nogmaals, staat gewoon letterlijk in het artikel. Dit zijn exact de schrijvers en teksten die gebruikt worden in die CRT-courses. Als jij vindt dat kinderen in high school dat soort ondoorgrondbare bagger nodig hebben, tja. CRT wordt niet onderwezen in high school, maar dat zou wel moeten volgens jou. Het is bijna Trumpiaans
[..]
Er is niemand die claimt dat je het niet over slavernij mag hebben.

quote:

Op woensdag 1 februari 2023 16:58 schreef PaarsBeestje het volgende:
[ twitter ]Jamie Raskin ondergaat momenteel behandelingen tegen kanker en raakt uiteraard zijn haar kwijt, en bedekt dat met een hoofddoekje. De republikeinen proberen af te dwingen dat hij dat niet mag dragen. Ik word hier zo misselijk van.

quote:

Biden has said he is unsure if the laptop is his and he does not remember dropping it off, but he has conceded that his memory at the height of his drug addiction was not reliable. His allies also suggest that materials later made public may be a mix of materials obtained in various ways.

During the same period, Biden also left a laptop with Keith Ablow, a Massachusetts-based psychiatrist who has been close to Republican activist Roger Stone. That laptop was seized by agents who raided Ablow's office in February 2020, and it was eventually returned to Biden.

Kevin Morris, one of Biden's friends and associates, has been overseeing a forensic analysis of that laptop to determine if it was the basis of the hard drives that were later distributed by Trump allies.

quote:

Op donderdag 2 februari 2023 00:51 schreef Kijkertje het volgende:
Nog meer gevolgen van DeSantis nieuwe wetten in de heksenjacht op 'WOKENESS!' op scholen:

[ twitter ]
[ twitter ]
En nog een draadje:

[ twitter ]

quote:

Manhattan prosecutors this week warned that they might file new fraud charges against Allen H. Weisselberg, a longtime top executive at Donald J. Trump’s real estate business — increasing pressure on Mr. Weisselberg to cooperate in a broader investigation into the former president, according to people with knowledge of the matter.

Mr. Weisselberg, the Trump Organization’s former chief financial officer, is already serving a five-month sentence in the Rikers Island jail complex after pleading guilty to unrelated tax fraud charges. While he testified against the company at its trial on the same charges last year, he has for years refused to turn on Mr. Trump directly.

But as the Manhattan district attorney, Alvin L. Bragg, jump-starts his office’s effort to indict Mr. Trump, his prosecutors are using the prospect of additional charges to exert leverage over Mr. Weisselberg, the people with knowledge of the matter said. The potential charges, which prosecutors conveyed to the former executive’s legal team this week, center on insurance fraud and could lead to a significant prison sentence for Mr. Weisselberg, who is 75.

[..]

quote:

Op vrijdag 3 februari 2023 09:04 schreef AnneX het volgende:
Informatief over de gaande en komende man als Chief of Staff.
https://www.newyorker.com(...)d-in-the-white-house

En opvallend hoe veel scherper en alerter Dems zijn in debatten.
Zie de post hierboven.
Er is een clip van AOC die vol overgave staat te fulmineren over het gedwongen vertrek uit een commissie van haar collega.
Die vervolgens prompt door Jeffries in een andere belangrijke commissie wordt geplaatst.

quote:

Op vrijdag 3 februari 2023 16:53 schreef MoreDakka het volgende:
Natuurlijk zijn die Republikeinen hypocriet, maar iemand als Omar hoort daar absoluut niet. Net zoals de Democraten die Taylor Green er ook ergens uitegooid hebben.

Wel grappig dat idioten zoals AOC dan weer beginnen over racisme enz

quote:

Op vrijdag 3 februari 2023 17:14 schreef Kijkertje het volgende:

[..]
Dat vind je wel een goede vergelijking? Greene die publiekelijk de executie van prominente Democraten propageerde wegens 'verraad' vs Ilhan Omar die haar excuses maakt over een tweet waarvan ze zich niet eens bewust was dat die gezien kon worden als anti-semitisch

quote:

Following the vote, House Foreign Affairs member Ken Buck, R-Colo., was overheard in an elevator calling it the "stupidest vote in the world." Fellow Rep. Mike Simpson, R-Idaho, agreed and added that all it does is make Omar a "martyr." They both also agreed that it was simply a retaliatory vote in response to Democrats removing certain Republicans from committees in the 117th Congress.

Buck and Simpson urged fellow passengers in the elevator to not let leadership know their thoughts.

Bron

quote:

On Wednesday, Rep. Jim Jordan, chair of the House Judiciary Committee, gaveled in the first hearing in what he promised will be a crusade against the Biden administration: “We won’t stop until we get the truth to fix the problem for the American people.” The hearing—supposedly about the “border crisis”—had little to do with truth, though, instead going off on wild tangents, highlighting MAGA disinformation, and exploiting human suffering. That was to be expected given the record of the man who led it—one of obstructing investigations, spreading disinformation, and sowing false doubt in the minds of the American people. It confirmed what we knew going into the hearing: Jordan is unfit to serve on the Judiciary Committee, much less lead it.

Jordan is a classic demagogue. When presented with facts or evidence which plainly debunk his position, he doesn’t concede or even attempt to further inquire into those truths. He instead seems content with pretending as though he was never presented with the truth at all, repeating his talking points incessantly without even acknowledging contradictory facts presented to him. This was seen most recently in an appearance on NBC’s Meet the Press, during which Jordan just flat-out ignored his interlocutor, Chuck Todd. Under his leadership, the committee’s aim to “fix” anything is a false premise, as Jordan has made clear he is out to get President Biden and his administration.

Jordan began Wednesday’s opening hearing with the white nationalism–tinged argument that Biden is intentionally working to flood the nation with dangerous undocumented immigrants. “Month after month after month, we have set records for migrants coming into the country, and frankly I think it’s intentional,” Jordan alleged. “It seems deliberate, it seems premeditated, it seems intentional.” This will be Jordan’s mode of oversight from his Judiciary Committee perch, lobbing unfounded allegations. “Make no mistake about it, the Biden administration is carrying out its plan,” he alleged on Wednesday, saying that “crimes committed by illegal alien trespassers and … overwhelmed local resources … are all part of [the] federal government’s plan.” Again, this is not oversight, it is demagoguery.

Jordan, in fact, is a classic example of a member of Congress who has demonstrated contempt for congressional oversight—except when he wants to abuse it for partisan purposes. That is clear from Jordan’s refusal to cooperate with the Jan. 6 House Select Committee’s investigations and, indeed, his own participation in the Trump-led attempted coup on the peaceful transition of power following the 2020 election.

The Jan. 6 committee’s final report describes Jordan as “a significant player” in Trump’s efforts to illegally overturn the 2020 election results. The evidence presented by the committee in their report lays bare how Jordan was “personally involved in the acts and circumstances of January 6th” and why he, along with a handful of other members, “should be questioned in a public forum about their advance knowledge of and role in President Trump’s plan to prevent the peaceful transition of power.”

Jordan, who wants to subpoena and question witnesses in his congressional investigations, himself ignored a congressional subpoena and flat-out refused to be questioned in a congressional investigation about the blatant attacks on our democracy.

Jordan has yet to account publicly for his involvement—he twice failed to appear for deposition testimony before the committee, instead responding via a series of letters setting out a “variety of objections.” In one such letter, Jordan contended that the committee’s request for him to appear was “outside the bounds of any legitimate inquiry, violates core Constitutional principles, and would serve to further erode legislative norms.” This was untrue and represented a series of false excuses to avoid accountability for his actions.

Appearing in response to the request for his testimony would have been the proper action, an action he refused to take, but no doubt expects others to undertake in the hearings he calls.

Beyond his refusal to testify about his own involvement in Jan. 6, Jordan’s general views and actions promote falsehoods and encourage attacks on legitimate institutions. As others have written, Jordan engaged in “a systematic disinformation campaign” of falsehoods about the election processes and institutions he vowed to protect; he was involved in “early post-election messaging strategy” and “participated in numerous post-election meetings in which senior White House officials, Rudolph Giuliani, and others, discussed strategies for challenging the election, chief among them claims that the election had been tainted by fraud”; and he advocated that state legislatures could appoint their own electors, fake electors, a legal theory in contravention of the Constitution and the Electoral Count Act.

But his actions intent on stymieing the transition of power on Jan. 6 were even more sinister. As early as November 2020, Jordan had been having discussions with White House officials about Vice President Mike Pence’s role on Jan. 6. Jordan, along with other Republican members of Congress from the Freedom Caucus, attended a White House meeting on Dec. 21, 2020, in which the plan to have Pence “affect the outcome of the election was disclosed and discussed,” according to the committee report. But Jordan’s involvement went further than merely attending meetings. He led them.

On Jan. 2, 2021, Jordan led a conference call with Trump and other members of Congress where the group “discussed strategies for delaying the January 6th joint session.” The group also “discussed issuing social media posts encouraging President Trump’s supporters to ‘march to the Capitol’ on the 6th.” These events involved nothing less than an effort to steal a presidential election for the first time in our history and helped lead to the insurrectionist attack on the Capitol.

Jordan’s communication with Trump and the White House endured right up until at least the evening of Jan. 6. Jordan himself has acknowledged that he forwarded a message to White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows on Jan. 5, advising that Pence should “call out all the electoral votes that he believes are unconstitutional as no electoral votes at all.” He has also admitted that he spoke to Trump “more than once” on Jan. 6, though he has provided inconsistent public statements on the exact number of conversations and has been less forthcoming on what the two spoke about. The Jan. 6 committee report also states that Jordan spoke at least twice with Rudy Giuliani on the evening of Jan 6, prior to the joint session resuming. Details of those conversations remain unknown, but “during that time, Giuliani has testified, he was attempting to reach Members of Congress after the joint session resumed to encourage them to continue objecting to Joe Biden’s electoral votes.”

Allegations about Jordan’s involvement in coverups are not new. Jordan served as an assistant wrestling coach at Ohio State University from 1986 to 1994 at a time when the team physician for OSU athletes was engaged in widespread sexual abuse of OSU student-athletes. An independent OSU investigation released in 2019 found that the physician, Richard Strauss, had sexually abused at least 177 male students during his 20-year tenure as an athletic and student health doctor at OSU.

The OSU report found that 22 coaches confirmed to investigators that they were aware of rumors and/or complaints about Strauss. Several former OSU wrestlers said in on-the-record interviews and in testimony before the Ohio statehouse in 2020 that they had either directly talked to Jordan about the situation or that he should have known about it as it was an “open secret” on the team. In 2019, a former wrestling referee said he reported sexual misconduct involving Strauss directly to Jordan.

Jordan called accusations that he helped cover up sexual abuse “false,” saying: “I never knew about any type of abuse.” Jordan accused one of the wrestlers of having a “vendetta” and, in a 2018 interview with Fox News, suggested the “lies” were “sequenced and choreographed” by “the left.” It’s all part of the Jordan playbook in his congressional role as well: Deflect, distract, and distort reality.

Jordan as a self-professed truth-seeker is an oxymoron, given the Ohio State allegation, his stonewalling of the congressional investigation into Trump’s attempted coup and the attack on the Capitol, and his refusal to comply with a congressional subpoena from the committee.

Unfortunately, Jordan is not only chairing the House Judiciary Committee. As part of his alleged quest to “get the truth,” he is also chairing a new subcommittee, named the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government. This new committee shows every sign of preparing to abuse congressional powers in order to undertake partisan attacks on the Biden administration, intelligence agencies, and law enforcement bodies.

It is Jordan’s responsibility to come fully clean about himself, including his active participation in the greatest attack on our democracy since the Civil War. Until he does, the last thing he should be doing is investigating anyone else.

quote:

Op zaterdag 4 februari 2023 03:36 schreef Kijkertje het volgende:
Chinese Ballon gespot!

[ twitter ]
[ afbeelding ]

[ twitter ]
Al die commentaren ook

Oh het Pentagon komt het volk geruststellen:

[ twitter ]
Maar daar zijn ze allemaal WOKE! natuurlijk

[ twitter ]

MTG heeft gelijk een heel draadje gesponnen

[ twitter ]
[..]
[ twitter ]
Ik ben benieuwd of MTG door de (ongetwijfeld factual) briefings die ze als lid van de Oversight Committee krijgt wat realistischer gaat worden in de toekomst. Dan zou haar benoeming daar tenminste nog enig nut hebben maar ik vrees het ergste. Bij Trump werkte dat iig niet. Integendeel ....

Oh ja AOC zit ook in die Committee. Gezellig!

[ twitter ]

quote:

Op zaterdag 4 februari 2023 21:10 schreef Sjemmert het volgende:

[..]
That didnt age well.

De ballon is neergeschoten.

https://www.forbes.com/si(...)tes/?sh=39fc61423935

[ twitter ]

quote:

Op zaterdag 4 februari 2023 22:04 schreef Bluesdude het volgende:
China heeft toch spionagesatelieten die foto's nemen.
Is het idee dat de ballon betere foto's kan doorsturen ?

quote:

But several reports have been published in the past two days that give us a better sense of when spy balloons operated by New Cold War adversaries have sailed into U.S. airspace. Bloomberg News reported on Friday that Chinese balloons flew over the U.S. while President Trump occupied the White House.

"The balloon spotted this week over Montana was not the first time the U.S. has detected Chinese balloons over their territory--with previous incursions occurring during the Trump Administration," Bloomberg reported.

But an unnamed source from the Trump administration insisted to Bloomberg in that same article that it wasn't a big deal.

"One top national security official from the administration of former President Donald Trump said none of the Chinese spy balloons were near sensitive sites or had payloads as large as this one appears to carry," Bloomberg continued.

And if you can't trust an unnamed official who worked for Trump, who can you trust, right?

The Associated Press also has a new report that quotes a defense expert who said that Chinese spy balloons have been detected near sensitive sites in Hawaii, home to a large U.S. military presence, during the past five years.

"Craig Singleton, a senior fellow at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, said Chinese surveillance balloons have been sighted on numerous occasions over the past five years in different parts of the Pacific, including near sensitive U.S. military installations in Hawaii," the Associated Press reported on Saturday.

President Biden has been in office for two years, leaving three years of Trump's presidency in that window of five years.

The Wall Street Journal also independently reported that Chinese spy balloons have flown over the U.S. before, though didn't specify the era.

"China has sent surveillance balloons over the continental U.S. on at least a handful of occasions, U.S. officials said," the Journal reported on Friday.

And all of this still leaves open the possibility that other adversary aircraft have flown over the U.S. during the Trump years, aside from balloons. We still don't know why swarms of drones were flying over Colorado and Nebraska in December 2019 and January 2020. If you'll recall, President Trump was president at that time and we never got an answer to who was behind that.

Trump himself posted a video to Twitter yesterday, rambling about how the University of Pennsylvania might be compromised by Chinese spies, an accusation for which he provided no evidence. Trump, a known liar and continued threat to the safety and security of the United States, also called for a the U.S. government to shoot down the Chinese spy balloon.

quote:

Long before the shoot down, U.S. officials took steps to protect against the balloon's collection of sensitive information, mitigating its intelligence value to the Chinese. The senior defense official said the recovery of the balloon will enable U.S. analysts to examine sensitive Chinese equipment. "I would also note that while we took all necessary steps to protect against the PRC surveillance balloon's collection of sensitive information, the surveillance balloon's overflight of U.S. territory was of intelligence value to us," the official said. "I can't go into more detail, but we were able to study and scrutinize the balloon and its equipment, which has been valuable."

The balloon did not pose a military or physical threat. Still its intrusion into American airspace over several days was an unacceptable violation of U.S. sovereignty. The official said Chinese balloons briefly transited the continental United States at least three times during the prior administration.

While Chinese officials admitted that the balloon was theirs, they said it was a runaway weather balloon. "The PRC has claimed publicly that the high-altitude balloon operating above the United States is a weather balloon that was blown off course. This is false," the official said. "This was a PRC surveillance balloon. This surveillance balloon purposely traversed the United States and Canada, and we are confident it was seeking to monitor sensitive military sites."

quote:

Op zaterdag 4 februari 2023 11:04 schreef Knipoogje het volgende:
https://www.washingtonpos(...)conspiracy-theories/

Waarom Dana Milbank mijn favo columnist is van de WaPo

* brokjespoes ligt inderdaad nogal dubbel hier maar gaat niet citeren⁽¹⁾; lees 't allemaal zelf maar!

quote:

Op dinsdag 7 februari 2023 18:53 schreef Bluesdude het volgende:
[ twitter ]

Gut.... weer een extreemrechtse terreurgroep
Ook trumplovers? Of vinden ze Trump te soft