abonnement bol.com Unibet Coolblue
pi_198411843
Ivermectin is een middel dat al door miljarden mensen wereldwijd is gebruikt de afgelopen 40 jaar. Het staat op "essentiële medicijnenlijst" van de WHO en is erg goedkoop.

Een aantal zaken die na voren komen na onderzoek:

-Het is een nuttig middel in elke fase van de ziekte
-88% reductie in infectie
-83% minder overlijdens
-Ook voor frontline werkers een enorme reductie in infectie van wel 87 tot 93%

Dr. John Campbell bespreekt Ivermectin en is erg positief:



Publicaties:

https://www.researchgate.(...)ion_v12_-_6_Jan_2021

https://covid19criticalca(...)ment-of-COVID-19.pdf

Het mag inmiddels duidelijk zijn dat Vitamine D en Hydroxychloroquine enorm goed werken in de strijd tegen Covid en nu dus ook Ivermectin.

Wel vreemd dat deze 3 middelen (die erg goedkoop zijn) niet worden besproken in de strategie van de overheid tegen Corona.
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
  dinsdag 9 maart 2021 @ 16:25:59 #2
482094 Mikeytt
Any/All. 1997
pi_198412121
Kunnen dit soort topics niet gewoon meteen in BNW geplaatst worden? Of in het FvD topic in POL.
BLACK LIVES MATTER
Mannenvoetbal heeft een fascismeprobleem
Nazis deserve to be beaten. Tolerance of intolerance is cowardice *O*
[img]https://i.imgur.com/jDiUACq.png[/img]
  dinsdag 9 maart 2021 @ 16:26:55 #3
37676 freako
Onverbeterlijke optimist
pi_198412138
Ivermectine is een prima geneesmiddel als je schurft hebt, of rivierblindheid, of als je je paard wil ontwormen.

Tegen covid-19 doet het echter niets.

https://www.cidrap.umn.ed(...)covid-19-study-shows
  dinsdag 9 maart 2021 @ 16:28:38 #4
482094 Mikeytt
Any/All. 1997
pi_198412158
quote:
0s.gif Op dinsdag 9 maart 2021 16:26 schreef freako het volgende:
Ivermectine is een prima geneesmiddel als je schurft hebt, of rivierblindheid, of als je je paard wil ontwormen.

Tegen covid-19 doet het echter niets.

https://www.cidrap.umn.ed(...)covid-19-study-shows
Gezondheidsraad zegt dat het niet werkt op basis van onderzoek > mensen zoeken een random dokter op die anders denkt > delen dat filmpje

"Kijk werkt wel, zijn doktoren die het zeggen!!!"
BLACK LIVES MATTER
Mannenvoetbal heeft een fascismeprobleem
Nazis deserve to be beaten. Tolerance of intolerance is cowardice *O*
[img]https://i.imgur.com/jDiUACq.png[/img]
pi_198412215
Campbell :') Betrouwbare link :') Schopje naar BNW inderdaad.
pi_198412241
quote:
0s.gif Op dinsdag 9 maart 2021 16:25 schreef Mikeytt het volgende:
Kunnen dit soort topics niet gewoon meteen in BNW geplaatst worden? Of in het FvD topic in POL.
Belachelijke reactie wederom van jou. Hier is gewoon serieus wetenschappelijk onderzoek naar verricht.

Mensenlevens kunnen worden gered met dit middel! Maar jij wil liever dat je oude beeld standhoudt dan dat je je beeld van de wereld moet aanpassen. Stel je toch eens voor hoe zo'n deuk dat oplevert in je ego dat je moet toegeven dat je ongelijk had!

Nee dan liever mensen onnodig laten doodgaan of niet Mikey?
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
  dinsdag 9 maart 2021 @ 16:35:07 #7
140043 Isdatzo
Born in the echoes.
pi_198412244
Nope. Is het niet.
Huilen dan.
pi_198412251
quote:
13s.gif Op dinsdag 9 maart 2021 16:34 schreef Probably_on_pcp het volgende:

[..]

Belachelijke reactie wederom van jou. Hier is gewoon serieus wetenschappelijk onderzoek naar verricht.

Mensenlevens kunnen worden gered met dit middel! Maar jij wil liever dat je oude beeld standhoudt dan dat je je beeld van de wereld moet aanpassen. Stel je toch eens voor hoe zo'n deuk dat oplevert in je ego dat je moet toegeven dat je ongelijk had!

Nee dan liever mensen onnodig laten doodgaan of niet Mikey?
doe de wetenschappelijke links dan maar eens.
pi_198412280
quote:
0s.gif Op dinsdag 9 maart 2021 16:26 schreef freako het volgende:
Ivermectine is een prima geneesmiddel als je schurft hebt, of rivierblindheid, of als je je paard wil ontwormen.

Tegen covid-19 doet het echter niets.

https://www.cidrap.umn.ed(...)covid-19-study-shows
Dit onderzoek wat jij linkt is een heel stuk kleiner en beperkter dan het onderzoek uit de OP.

Ga je de onderzoeken nog inhoudelijk vergelijken of vind je het linken naar dat artikel voldoende? Je wilt niet een uur van je tijd besteden om de video's uit de OP eens aandachtig door te nemen?
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
  dinsdag 9 maart 2021 @ 16:38:26 #10
140043 Isdatzo
Born in the echoes.
pi_198412290
quote:
0s.gif Op dinsdag 9 maart 2021 16:37 schreef Probably_on_pcp het volgende:

[..]

Dit onderzoek wat jij linkt is een heel stuk kleiner en beperkter dan het onderzoek uit de OP.

Ga je de onderzoeken nog inhoudelijk vergelijken of vind je het linken naar dat artikel voldoende? Je wilt niet een uur van je tijd besteden om de video's uit de OP eens aandachtig door te nemen?
Hier heb je een RCT-studie. Je weet wel, het soort onderzoek waarmee je klinische effectiviteit kan aantonen in tegenstelling tot die cherry picked retrospectieve onderzoeken waar jij mee aan komt zetten:

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2777389
Huilen dan.
pi_198412304
quote:
0s.gif Op dinsdag 9 maart 2021 16:28 schreef Mikeytt het volgende:

[..]

Gezondheidsraad zegt dat het niet werkt op basis van onderzoek > mensen zoeken een random dokter op die anders denkt > delen dat filmpje

"Kijk werkt wel, zijn doktoren die het zeggen!!!"
De dokter bespreekt heel keurig stap voor stap het onderzoek dat gedaan is naar Ivermectin. Het staat jou vervolgens vrij om dat in de wetenschappelijke publicaties te checken.

Maar goed, jij bent natuurlijk druk met het posten of fok. Je moet wel aan je dagelijkse quota komen van mensen onderuit schoffelen en belachelijk maken. Je moet je ego wel blijven voeden natuurlijk.
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_198412323
quote:
0s.gif Op dinsdag 9 maart 2021 16:35 schreef Aanmodderfakker het volgende:

[..]

doe de wetenschappelijke links dan maar eens.
He wat een verrassing! Je mengt je met een uitgesproken mening in een topic en hebt de OP niet eens doorgenomen!

:')
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
  dinsdag 9 maart 2021 @ 16:41:30 #13
140043 Isdatzo
Born in the echoes.
pi_198412327
quote:
0s.gif Op dinsdag 9 maart 2021 16:05 schreef Probably_on_pcp het volgende:

Het mag inmiddels duidelijk zijn dat Vitamine D en Hydroxychloroquine enorm goed werken in de strijd tegen Covid

:D :'(
Huilen dan.
pi_198412336
quote:
7s.gif Op dinsdag 9 maart 2021 16:38 schreef Isdatzo het volgende:

[..]

Hier heb je een RCT-studie. Je weet wel, het soort onderzoek waarmee je klinische effectiviteit kan aantonen in tegenstelling tot die cherry picked retrospectieve onderzoeken waar jij mee aan komt zetten:

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2777389
Die werd hierboven ook al genoemd. Heb ik al op gereageerd.
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
  dinsdag 9 maart 2021 @ 16:43:27 #15
72545 Megumi
Go Rin No Sho
pi_198412357
quote:
0s.gif Op dinsdag 9 maart 2021 16:39 schreef Probably_on_pcp het volgende:

[..]

De dokter bespreekt heel keurig stap voor stap het onderzoek dat gedaan is naar Ivermectin. Het staat jou vervolgens vrij om dat in de wetenschappelijke publicaties te checken.

Maar goed, jij bent natuurlijk druk met het posten of fok. Je moet wel aan je dagelijkse quota komen van mensen onderuit schoffelen en belachelijk maken. Je moet je ego wel blijven voeden natuurlijk.
Dat zijn er in jou bron maar twee. En dat is onvoldoende. En dat vitamine D zou helpen en of Hydroxychloroquine is nog niet zeker. En het gebruik van Hydroxychloroquine is zelfs mogelijk gevaarlijk.
https://www.radboudumc.nl(...)ng%20van%20infecties.
Wordt als iemand die voortdurend dood is. De ware volgeling van bushidõ sterft elke ochtend en avond opnieuw. En wordt niet gehinderd door angst voor de dood. Yamamoto Tsunetomo's hagakure.
pi_198412358
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
  dinsdag 9 maart 2021 @ 16:44:28 #17
140043 Isdatzo
Born in the echoes.
pi_198412374
quote:
0s.gif Op dinsdag 9 maart 2021 16:42 schreef Probably_on_pcp het volgende:

[..]

Die werd hierboven ook al genoemd. Heb ik al op gereageerd.
RCT > retrospectief onderzoek.

Het grote manco van veel van dat soort studies waarin je achteraf kijkt naar resultaten van verschillende behandelingen is dat je moeilijk groepen met een verschillende behandeling met elkaar kan vergelijken omdat de groepen niet hetzelfde zijn.
Huilen dan.
pi_198412376
quote:
0s.gif Op dinsdag 9 maart 2021 16:43 schreef Megumi het volgende:

[..]

Dat zijn er in jou bron maar twee. En dat is onvoldoende. En dat vitamine D zou helpen en of Hydroxychloroquine is nog niet zeker. En het gebruik van Hydroxychloroquine is zelfs mogelijk gevaarlijk.
https://www.radboudumc.nl(...)ng%20van%20infecties.
Er is inmiddels genoeg bekend over HCQ om te zeggen dat het een heel goed middel is:

COR / Studie: Vroeg toedienen Hydroxychloroquine heeft effect
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_198412385
quote:
7s.gif Op dinsdag 9 maart 2021 16:44 schreef Isdatzo het volgende:

[..]

RCT > retrospectief onderzoek.

Het grote manco van veel van dat soort studies waarin je achteraf kijkt naar resultaten van verschillende behandelingen is dat je moeilijk groepen met een verschillende behandeling met elkaar kan vergelijken omdat de groepen niet hetzelfde zijn.
Leuk die woorden van je. Heb je de video's uit de OP bekeken en de publicaties gelezen?
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
  dinsdag 9 maart 2021 @ 16:46:58 #20
72545 Megumi
Go Rin No Sho
pi_198412413
quote:
0s.gif Op dinsdag 9 maart 2021 16:44 schreef Probably_on_pcp het volgende:

[..]

Er is inmiddels genoeg bekend over HCQ om te zeggen dat het een heel goed middel is:

COR / Studie: Vroeg toedienen Hydroxychloroquine heeft effect
Dat is maar net wat voor bron je gebruikt. En een bron posten vol met studies is nietszeggend.
https://www.gelderlander.(...)ewijs-voor~a8ed7383/
Wordt als iemand die voortdurend dood is. De ware volgeling van bushidõ sterft elke ochtend en avond opnieuw. En wordt niet gehinderd door angst voor de dood. Yamamoto Tsunetomo's hagakure.
  dinsdag 9 maart 2021 @ 16:48:30 #21
140043 Isdatzo
Born in the echoes.
pi_198412431
quote:
0s.gif Op dinsdag 9 maart 2021 16:45 schreef Probably_on_pcp het volgende:

[..]

Leuk die woorden van je.
Dank je.
quote:
Heb je de video's uit de OP bekeken
Nee.
quote:
en de publicaties gelezen?
Nee. Ik zal vanavond eens kijken :* , als jij belooft te gaan snappen dat RCT-studies eigenlijk de enige manier zijn om de klinische effectiviteit van een behandeling aan te tonen.
Huilen dan.
  dinsdag 9 maart 2021 @ 16:56:49 #22
72545 Megumi
Go Rin No Sho
pi_198412546
quote:
0s.gif Op dinsdag 9 maart 2021 16:44 schreef Probably_on_pcp het volgende:

[..]

Er is inmiddels genoeg bekend over HCQ om te zeggen dat het een heel goed middel is:

COR / Studie: Vroeg toedienen Hydroxychloroquine heeft effect
Grappig is dat als je de studies die jij post leest dat dus alles behalve zeker is.
Wordt als iemand die voortdurend dood is. De ware volgeling van bushidõ sterft elke ochtend en avond opnieuw. En wordt niet gehinderd door angst voor de dood. Yamamoto Tsunetomo's hagakure.
pi_198413699
quote:
10s.gif Op dinsdag 9 maart 2021 16:41 schreef Probably_on_pcp het volgende:

[..]

He wat een verrassing! Je mengt je met een uitgesproken mening in een topic en hebt de OP niet eens doorgenomen!

:')
Ah de toon van een wappie
  Moderator dinsdag 9 maart 2021 @ 18:30:40 #24
54278 crew  Tijger_m
42
pi_198413756
Gezien het feit dat het medicijn in kwestie totaal niet werkzaam blijkt te zijn in de echte wereld gaat dit topic naar BNW

https://www.medischcontac(...)et-tegen-corona-.htm
"The enemy isn't men, or women, it's bloody stupid people and no one has the right to be stupid." - Sir Terry Pratchett.
pi_198414417
quote:
0s.gif Op dinsdag 9 maart 2021 18:30 schreef Tijger_m het volgende:
Gezien het feit dat het medicijn in kwestie totaal niet werkzaam blijkt te zijn in de echte wereld gaat dit topic naar BNW

https://www.medischcontac(...)et-tegen-corona-.htm
Bespottelijk.

Je moet je echt je ogen uit je kop schamen.

Je zou op z'n minst moeten zeggen dat je de waarheid in het midden laat, maar nee hoor een mod die bepaald welke bron leidend is en wat de waarheid is.

[ Bericht 8% gewijzigd door Probably_on_pcp op 09-03-2021 19:20:47 ]
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_198435380
quote:
13s.gif Op dinsdag 9 maart 2021 19:15 schreef Probably_on_pcp het volgende:

Bespottelijk.

Je moet je echt je ogen uit je kop schamen.

Je zou op z'n minst moeten zeggen dat je de waarheid in het midden laat, maar nee hoor een mod die bepaald welke bron leidend is en wat de waarheid is.
In wat voor vakgebied werk jij?
  woensdag 10 maart 2021 @ 21:39:58 #27
256666 leeell
I know you're lonely
pi_198435632
quote:
13s.gif Op dinsdag 9 maart 2021 19:15 schreef Probably_on_pcp het volgende:

[..]

Bespottelijk.

Je moet je echt je ogen uit je kop schamen.

Je zou op z'n minst moeten zeggen dat je de waarheid in het midden laat, maar nee hoor een mod die bepaald welke bron leidend is en wat de waarheid is.
Wordt het niet eens tijd voor een baan jongen?
Op maandag 1 oktober 2012 18:45 schreef Chocolatebear het volgende:
Zei de man, terwijl hij een shaggie opstak en het gas open trok van zijn Tomos.
  donderdag 11 maart 2021 @ 00:28:24 #28
458309 Gebruikersnaam_7
alles laten meewerken ten goed
pi_198438686
quote:
7s.gif Op dinsdag 9 maart 2021 16:41 schreef Isdatzo het volgende:

[..]

:D :'(
:'( :'(
  donderdag 11 maart 2021 @ 09:50:34 #29
258333 Vis1980
Veni Vidi Vissie
pi_198441296
quote:
13s.gif Op dinsdag 9 maart 2021 19:15 schreef Probably_on_pcp het volgende:

[..]

Bespottelijk.

Je moet je echt je ogen uit je kop schamen.

Je zou op z'n minst moeten zeggen dat je de waarheid in het midden laat, maar nee hoor een mod die bepaald welke bron leidend is en wat de waarheid is.
Kom anders eens met betrouwbare bronnen. Verder moet je eens goed in de spiegel kojken als je het verschil niet meer ziet tussen BNW en realiteit.
Het antwoord op de belangrijkste vraag van alle vragen? 42!
pi_199375657
Studie naar Ivermectin met zeer positieve resultaten. Nog niet gepeer-reviewed:

"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_199375743
quote:
0s.gif Op dinsdag 9 maart 2021 18:30 schreef Tijger_m het volgende:
Gezien het feit dat het medicijn in kwestie totaal niet werkzaam blijkt te zijn in de echte wereld gaat dit topic naar BNW

https://www.medischcontac(...)et-tegen-corona-.htm
Men is er nog helemaal niet definitief over uit, maar
quote:
Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified.
(bron)
  dinsdag 11 mei 2021 @ 19:37:29 #32
14142 Daffodil31LE
Pienter Pookje
pi_199377659
Het moge inmiddels duidelijk zijn dat geen enkel middel, hoe effectief ook, werkzaam MAG zijn van de vaccin-pushers.
Haha, U schakelt nog. Test een DAF !
pi_199378755
quote:
0s.gif Op dinsdag 11 mei 2021 19:37 schreef Daffodil31LE het volgende:
Het moge inmiddels duidelijk zijn dat geen enkel middel, hoe effectief ook, werkzaam MAG zijn van de vaccin-pushers.
Toch worden er weldegelijk al bestaande medicijnen gebruikt om bijvoorbeeld de cytokinestorm te reduceren
(bron)

Heel simpel gezegd: alle ontstekingsremmers voorkomen ergere symptomen van Covid omdat ze het immuunsysteem kalmeren.
  woensdag 12 mei 2021 @ 12:44:55 #34
279682 theguyver
Sidekick van A tuin-hek!
pi_199387001
quote:
0s.gif Op dinsdag 11 mei 2021 19:37 schreef Daffodil31LE het volgende:
Het moge inmiddels duidelijk zijn dat geen enkel middel, hoe effectief ook, werkzaam MAG zijn van de vaccin-pushers.
Ik heb een bekende Amerikaanse zakenman/politicus horen zeggen dat bleekmiddel zeer effectief is om corona te bestrijden!
Er staat nog een vraag voor u open!!
  woensdag 12 mei 2021 @ 14:13:55 #35
140043 Isdatzo
Born in the echoes.
pi_199388278
quote:
0s.gif Op dinsdag 11 mei 2021 19:37 schreef Daffodil31LE het volgende:
Het moge inmiddels duidelijk zijn dat geen enkel middel, hoe effectief ook, werkzaam MAG zijn van de vaccin-pushers.
Wat een onzin weer.
Huilen dan.
pi_199388656
Dat het gros van mensen zich graag eenzijdig door bigpharma met belangen laten informeren is een studie waard op zich. En het zijn vaak mensen die hebben gestudeerd 🤔
pi_199388676
quote:
7s.gif Op woensdag 12 mei 2021 14:13 schreef Isdatzo het volgende:

[..]

Wat een onzin weer.
Een anti chloroquine artikel werd toch weer verwijderd uit een wetenschappelijk tijdschrift vanwege leugens?
  woensdag 12 mei 2021 @ 15:02:45 #38
140043 Isdatzo
Born in the echoes.
pi_199388833
quote:
0s.gif Op woensdag 12 mei 2021 14:48 schreef TFL het volgende:

[..]

Een anti chloroquine artikel werd toch weer verwijderd uit een wetenschappelijk tijdschrift vanwege leugens?
Dat maakt HCQ niet ineens wél effectief. Hoeveel solide onderzoeken staan daartegenover? En een uitstekend voorbeeld van het zelfreinigend vermogen van de medische wetenschap, niet?
Huilen dan.
pi_199388905
quote:
7s.gif Op woensdag 12 mei 2021 15:02 schreef Isdatzo het volgende:

[..]

Dat maakt HCQ niet ineens wél effectief. Hoeveel solide onderzoeken staan daartegenover? En een uitstekend voorbeeld van het zelfreinigend vermogen van de medische wetenschap, niet?
Als HCQ niet werkt en daar zoveel bewijs voor is. Waarvoor was die lastercampagne in een wetenschappelijk tijdschrift (die weer werd weggehaald) tegen HCQ dan goed voor?
  woensdag 12 mei 2021 @ 15:12:53 #40
140043 Isdatzo
Born in the echoes.
pi_199388956
quote:
1s.gif Op woensdag 12 mei 2021 15:09 schreef TFL het volgende:

[..]

Als HCQ niet werkt en daar zoveel bewijs voor is. Waarvoor was die lastercampagne in een wetenschappelijk tijdschrift (die weer werd weggehaald) tegen HCQ dan goed voor?
Nergens goed voor. Prachtige redenatie dit.
Huilen dan.
pi_199389570
quote:
0s.gif Op woensdag 12 mei 2021 14:47 schreef TFL het volgende:
Dat het gros van mensen zich graag eenzijdig door bigpharma met belangen laten informeren is een studie waard op zich. En het zijn vaak mensen die hebben gestudeerd 🤔
Iedereen met een beetje verstand weet dat juist big pharma goedkoop is, ten opzichte van bijna alle alternatieve dingen. Zoals homeopathie en dergelijke..

dus juist die alternatieve producenten hebben belangen, big pharma veel minder. Zij willen gewoon producten op de markt wat wetenschappelijk werkt.
Een vaccin bijvoorbeeld werkt, en je het maar 1 keer of misschien 2 keer te gebruiken. Medicijnen daarentegen moet je je leven gebruiken en kost dus meer. Big Pharma zou dan juist tegen vaccinatie moeten zijn.
  woensdag 12 mei 2021 @ 17:50:07 #42
14142 Daffodil31LE
Pienter Pookje
pi_199391082
quote:
0s.gif Op woensdag 12 mei 2021 12:44 schreef theguyver het volgende:

[..]

Ik heb een bekende Amerikaanse zakenman/politicus horen zeggen dat bleekmiddel zeer effectief is om corona te bestrijden!
Dan heb je slecht geluisterd, ofwel is jouw kennis van de Engelse taal een beetje aan de lage kant.

Er werd gesproken over een desinfecterend middel, niet over bleekmiddel.
Haha, U schakelt nog. Test een DAF !
pi_199425123
twitter
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_199452044
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_199452069
Weten ze daar niet dat Ivermectin een alu-hoedje medicijn is??

"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_199452599
Mensen wier realiteit enkel bestaat uit dat wat door een select groepje geautoriseerde instituten en personen wordt gezegd, zijn niet te overtuigen. Dat moet je ook niet willen proberen, ze denken niet als kritische mensen. Het enige dat hen kan ontwaken is een immens schokkende ervaring. Maar dan moeten ze natuurlijk wel in staat zijn oorzaak en gevolg te linken.
pi_199452722
quote:
14s.gif Op zondag 16 mei 2021 16:00 schreef QuidProJoe het volgende:
Mensen wier realiteit enkel bestaat uit dat wat door een select groepje geautoriseerde instituten en personen wordt gezegd, zijn niet te overtuigen. Dat moet je ook niet willen proberen, ze denken niet als kritische mensen. Het enige dat hen kan ontwaken is een immens schokkende ervaring. Maar dan moeten ze natuurlijk wel in staat zijn oorzaak en gevolg te linken.
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_199542208
Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19

Abstract

Background:
After COVID-19 emerged on U.S shores, providers began reviewing the emerging basic science, translational, and clinical data to identify potentially effective treatment options. In addition, a multitude of both novel and repurposed therapeutic agents were used empirically and studied within clinical trials.

Areas of Uncertainty:
The majority of trialed agents have failed to provide reproducible, definitive proof of efficacy in reducing the mortality of COVID-19 with the exception of corticosteroids in moderate to severe disease. Recently, evidence has emerged that the oral antiparasitic agent ivermectin exhibits numerous antiviral and anti-inflammatory mechanisms with trial results reporting significant outcome benefits. Given some have not passed peer review, several expert groups including Unitaid/World Health Organization have undertaken a systematic global effort to contact all active trial investigators to rapidly gather the data needed to grade and perform meta-analyses.

Data Sources:
Data were sourced from published peer-reviewed studies, manuscripts posted to preprint servers, expert meta-analyses, and numerous epidemiological analyses of regions with ivermectin distribution campaigns.

Therapeutic Advances:
A large majority of randomized and observational controlled trials of ivermectin are reporting repeated, large magnitude improvements in clinical outcomes. Numerous prophylaxis trials demonstrate that regular ivermectin use leads to large reductions in transmission. Multiple, large “natural experiments” occurred in regions that initiated “ivermectin distribution” campaigns followed by tight, reproducible, temporally associated decreases in case counts and case fatality rates compared with nearby regions without such campaigns.

Conclusions:
Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified.

https://journals.lww.com/(...)nstrating_the.4.aspx
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_199556058
COVID-19: Disease Hitting a Brick Wall in Mexico City



What will you do if you get COVID while waiting in line for the vaccine, or even after?

If you are in Mexico City, you will be treated with ivermectin. As of Dec 29, this long-established drug has been used in COVID-positive patients, and soon thereafter death rates started to plummet, as the graphic shows. By Jan 22, about 50,000 doses had been delivered.

Mexico City is following the example of the state of Chiapas, which saw cases drop by two-thirds after it started using ivermectin on Aug 1, as Dr. Pierre Kory told the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs on Dec 8.

It is too soon to see whether vaccinations decrease the rate of COVID hospitalizations or deaths. In the U.S., these are still rising, and the official policy on early treatment is still therapeutic nihilism. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) did update its long-standing recommendation against ivermectin to “neutral.” It considers the evidence from 39 trials, all favorable, to be insufficient.

We are already seeing adverse side effects from the vaccine. Some 151 deaths shortly following (but not necessarily caused by) the vaccine have been reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS). A nurse who cares for nursing home residents describes deterioration in his patients’ mobility and cognition after their second dose.

Between Dec 14 and Dec 18, about 272,001 doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine were administered and 3,150 “Health Impact Events” were recorded (1.1%). The CDC’s definition of Health Impact Events is “unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work, required care from doctor or health care professional.” It is not known how serious or long-lasting the events were. When people receive the vaccine, they will receive information on signing up for the V-safe program.

It is not known whether the vaccine would prevent or ameliorate the disease if taken after exposure. It is also not known whether vaccinated persons can transmit disease, according to the Robert Koch Institute. Vaccinated persons can be treated if they get COVID.

Head-to-head comparisons between long-term results of early treatment versus vaccination are not being done.

For some vulnerable populations, such as prison inmates, it is too late for vaccination. In one Arizona prison, more than half the inmates tested positive for COVID-19 in early December. AAPS has a asked Arizona governor Doug Ducey to facilitate making ivermectin available in prisons and other high-risk settings.

https://aapsonline.org/co(...)wall-in-mexico-city/
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_199556208
Ivermectin: Controversial COVID-19 Drug Used in Mexico City

Yesterday, Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador announced on Twitter he tested positive for COVID-19. He added that he is doing well and today, he called Russian President Vladimir Putin to discuss the delivery of 24 million doses of the Sputnik V vaccine.

Meanwhile, Oliva López, Head of the Mexico City Ministry of Health, reported that the city’s medical staff was administering ivermectin and azithromycin to COVID-19 patients, reported el Financiero, with the support of the National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition “Salvador Zubirán” (INCMNSZ), the Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS) and the Ministry of Education, Science, Technology and Innovation (SECTEI). “The Ministry of Health has determined there is enough evidence to use medicines such as ivermectin and azithromycin on SARS-CoV-2 positive people, even those without symptoms,” said López. In Mexico City, 50,747 people have been administered one of those medicines, among others, as part of their COVID-19 treatment, López told Forbes Mexico. However, she urged citizens to avoid self-medicating when it came to these treatments and urged anyone presenting symptoms to get medical attention.

Last April, researchers from Monash University in Melbourne, Australia, discovered that ivermectin could be used to treat SARS-CoV-2, reported Forbes Mexico. But both the FDA and WHO advise against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 and warn of side effects, reports Deutsche Welle. Previously, ivermectin tablets had been approved for the treatment of some parasitic worms, while topical formulations were approved for the treatment of external parasites such as headlice and skin conditions such as rosacea, according to the FDA. But more evidence is necessary regarding its effectiveness and safety in the treatment of COVID-19, warn researchers.

Last month, the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAPHRA) said that the drug had not been approved for human use as there is no sound clinical evidence supporting its use in fighting COVID-19, reports iAfrica. The Regulatory Authority argued that the clinical trials needed to justify its administration are still lacking. However, some countries in Latin America including Peru, Bolivia and Guatemala have been administering ivermectin to COVID-19 patients.

https://mexicobusiness.ne(...)rug-used-mexico-city
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_199631152
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_199645357
"I Don't Know Of A Bigger Story In The World" Right Now Than Ivermectin: NYTimes Best-Selling Author

So why are journalists not covering it?

Michael Capuzzo, a New York Times best-selling author , has just published an article titled “The Drug That Cracked Covid”. The 15-page article chronicles the gargantuan struggle being waged by frontline doctors on all continents to get ivermectin approved as a Covid-19 treatment, as well as the tireless efforts by reporters, media outlets and social media companies to thwart them.

Because of ivermectin, Capuzzo says, there are “hundreds of thousands, actually millions, of people around the world, from Uttar Pradesh in India to Peru to Brazil, who are living and not dying.” Yet media outlets have done all they can to “debunk” the notion that ivermectin may serve as an effective, easily accessible and affordable treatment for Covid-19. They have parroted the arguments laid out by health regulators around the world that there just isn’t enough evidence to justify its use.

For his part, Capuzzo, as a reporter, “saw with [his] own eyes the other side [of the story]” that has gone unreported, of the many patients in the US whose lives have been saved by ivermectin and of five of the doctors that have led the battle to save lives around the world, Paul Marik, Umberto Meduri, José Iglesias, Pierre Kory and Joe Varon. These are all highly decorated doctors. Through their leadership of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care (FLCCC) Alliance, they have already enhanced our treatment of Covid-19 by discovering and promoting the use of Corticoid steroids against the virus. But their calls for ivermectin to also be used have met with a wall of resistance from healthcare regulators and a wall of silence from media outlets.

“I really wish the world could see both sides,” Capuzzo laments.

But unfortunately most reporters are not interested in telling the other side of the story. Even if they were, their publishers would probably refuse to publish it.

Gaat verder:

https://www.zerohedge.com(...)-best-selling-author
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_199659017
Artikel met wat redelijk wat grafieken als je direct naar de link gaat.

After Mexico City introduced ivermectin plan, COVID hospitalizations and deaths disappeared

MEXICO CITY, May 26, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — A city-wide initiative in Mexico’s bustling capital to prescribe ivermectin to COVID-19 positive patients has resulted in a 52–76 percent reduction in hospitalizations, according to research by the Mexican Digital Agency for Public Innovation (DAPI), Mexico’s Ministry of Health, and the Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS).

Concerned about hospital capacity in the summer of 2020, the Mexican government devised an aggressive testing regime, ramping up from 3,000 tests per day in June to around 24,000 antigen tests every day by that November, according to TrialSiteNews. Mexico City Ministry of Health head Oliva López later announced that doctors will give ivermectin and azithromycin to treat COVID-19.

“The Ministry of Health has identified that there is enough evidence to use in people positive for SARS-CoV-2, even without symptoms, some drugs such as ivermectin and azithromycin,” López confirmed in a press conference.

Local authorities created a home-treatment-kit, including ivermectin, for its 22 million-strong population on December 28, 2020, following a spike in cases of COVID-19.

Individuals testing positive for COVID from an antigen test, and who were experiencing at least mild symptoms, began receiving one of the government’s ivermectin-based treatment kits from December 29.

As part of the program of testing and early treatment, the Mexican government opened a study to track the effect that early treatment of COVID with ivermectin was having on the city’s population. Run by the Mexico Ministry of Health, DAPI, and IMSS, a phone-based monitoring program traced the health of individuals testing positive for COVID with an antigen test. The study followed two cohorts — those who received ivermectin and those who did not — and included 200,000 people, TrialSiteNews revealed.

twitter


Gaat verder:

https://www.lifesitenews.(...)d-deaths-disappeared
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
  zaterdag 29 mei 2021 @ 14:43:15 #54
279682 theguyver
Sidekick van A tuin-hek!
pi_199669131
alcohol ontsmet ook.
Dus ik stel voor dat we allemaal naar cafe gaan zuipen!
2 vliegen in een klap, je helpt het cafe wat door dit corona gedoe in geld nood zit.
Plus als je maar genoeg zuipt..... ^O^

Ik ken een BNW-er die een Pro is.. en tot nu toe niet besmet is geweest (naar mijn weten) dus het werkt!!!
Er staat nog een vraag voor u open!!
pi_199688828
quote:
0s.gif Op dinsdag 9 maart 2021 16:33 schreef Aanmodderfakker het volgende:
Campbell :') Betrouwbare link :') Schopje naar BNW inderdaad.
Waarom zou deze man onbetrouwbaar zijn?
pi_199688908
quote:
1s.gif Op zondag 30 mei 2021 22:18 schreef An_0_Niem het volgende:

[..]

Waarom zou deze man onbetrouwbaar zijn?
Dit is fantastisch! Bedankt.
pi_199697415
Is Ivermectin The New Penicillin?

Ivermectin, an anti-parasitic drug placed the same radioactive category as Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for the treatment of COVID-19, has reemerged as a promising treatment in the battle to extinguish the pandemic.

New York Times best-selling author Michael Capuzzo has called it the "drug that cracked Covid," writing that there are “hundreds of thousands, actually millions, of people around the world, from Uttar Pradesh in India to Peru to Brazil, who are living and not dying.”

Doctors in India are big fans.

To that end Dr. Justus R. Hope, MD asks in The Desert Review: Is Ivermectin the new Penicillin?

As those Indian States using Ivermectin continue to diverge in cases and deaths from those states that forbid it, the natural experiment illustrates the power of Ivermectin decisively.

Cases in Delhi, where Ivermectin was begun on April 20, dropped from 28,395 to just 2,260 on May 22. This represents an astounding 92% drop. Likewise, cases in Uttar Pradesh have dropped from 37,944 on April 24 to 5,964 on May 22 - a decline of 84%.

Delhi and Uttar Pradesh followed the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) guidance published April 20, 2021, which called for dosing of .2 mg per kg of Ivermectin per body weight for three days. This amounts to 15 mg per day for a 150-pound person or 18 mg per day for a 200-pound individual.

The other three Indian states that adopted it are all down as well. Goa is down from 4,195 to 1,647, Uttarakhand is down from 9,624 to 2,903, and Karnataka is down from 50,112 to 31,183. Goa adopted a pre-emptive policy of mass Ivermectin prevention for the entire adult population over age 18 at a dose of 12 mg daily for five days.

Meanwhile, Tamil Nadu announced on May 14 they were outlawing Ivermectin in favor of the politically correct Remdesivir. As a result, Tamil Nadu's cases are up in the same time frame from April 20 to May 22 - 10,986 to 35,873 - more than a tripling.

Although Big Pharma and Big Media have scrambled to try, they cannot explain away this natural experiment. As I predicted May 12, they would first argue "the lockdowns worked." The problem with this is that Tamil Nadu has been on strict lockdown for weeks as their cases have done nothing but climb. So the lockdown did not work.

Their next argument was that "there has been a shift from the highly populated urban areas like Delhi and Mumbai" to the hinterlands, like Tamil Nadu. The big problem is that the adjacent state, Karnataka is just as rural, and its cases are dropping on Ivermectin.

Uttar Pradesh is near the Himalayas and out in the far non-urbanized north where cases are down 84% with Ivermectin. Uttarakhand is even more rural and located in the Himalayas next to Nepal. Its infections are down 70% with Ivermectin.

Their final argument lacked any proof. It was essentially an attempt to smear Ivermectin through association with another drug. It attempted to link Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) with Ivermectin unfairly. While HCQ has become a punchline by the media, scientists like Dr. George Fareed know it is effective against COVID-19 – especially in the early stages.

Dr. Fareed and his associate, Dr. Brian Tyson, have treated some 6,000 patients with nearly 100% success using a combination of HCQ, Ivermectin, Fluvoxamine, and various nutraceuticals, including zinc Vitamin D.

https://www.thedesertrevi(...)9a-f3e1151e98c3.html

Unfortunately, none of this has made it through the censorship of the mainstream media, and the public has not heard about the 200 plus studies that reflect HCQ's effectiveness against COVID-19. The fact remains that HCQ has an undeserved negative connotation due to its connection with Trump, which is unfortunately used to tarnish other life-saving repurposed drugs, like Ivermectin. For example, in the recent Forbes article, journalist Ray uses the title, "Is Ivermectin the New Hydroxychloroquine?"

https://www.forbes.com/si(...)xperts-urge-caution/

Ray does not make a single substantive argument against Ivermectin; instead, he attempts to defame, debase or degrade it by repeating baseless accusations. For example, Ray cited Merck's recommendation against Ivermectin as evidence of ineffectiveness, while Merck used no evidence to support their claim. In addition, he cited the FDA's recommendation against Ivermectin, yet the FDA admits they have not reviewed the data on which to base this conclusion: "The FDA has not reviewed data to support the use of Ivermectin in COVID-19 patients to treat or prevent COVID-19..."

As we all know, Merck was involved in the development of a competing drug and had 356 million reasons to throw its own cheap, unprofitable Ivermectin under the bus. Furthermore, the US government was likewise involved in a significant financial conflict of interest with Merck.

https://trialsitenews.com(...)analogy-appropriate/

The story of Ivermectin is more similar to that of Penicillin. Penicillin has saved almost 200 million lives. In addition, three men shared a Nobel Prize in 1945 for its discovery.

Ivermectin's discoverers won the 2015 Noble Prize in Medicine, and it has proven to be a life-saving drug in parasitic disease, especially in Africa. Over the past four decades, Ivermectin has saved millions from parasites like strongyloidiasis and onchocerciasis - river blindness.

It has already saved tens of thousands from COVID-19 in India in those few locations that use it. It crashed Mexico's, Slovakia's, and Zimbabwe’s cases. I remain more convinced than ever that Ivermectin will bring an end to this Pandemic as the word gets out and more people share the book, Ivermectin for the World. A more fitting title to the Forbes piece might be, "Is Ivermectin the New Penicillin?"

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/ivermectin-new-penicillin
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_199789083
Ivermectin in Mexico, Peru en India

"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_199789134
quote:
1s.gif Op zondag 30 mei 2021 22:18 schreef An_0_Niem het volgende:

[..]

Waarom zou deze man onbetrouwbaar zijn?
Campbell is inderdaad een "normie" en een rustige man die wetenschap heel belangrijk vindt. Hij is pro-vax, maar vindt ook dat we moeten kijken naar andere mogelijke "therapeutics" en dat laatste mag niet van sommigen.

Een duidelijk teken dat Campbell een "normie" is, is de opmerking die hij plaatste bij het onderzoek van de WHO en Oxford naar HCQ. De WHO en Oxford hadden in een HCQ proef de dubbele veilige dosis toegeschreven (terwijl we al decennia lang de veilige dosis kennen) en de proef had geen goede resultaten. Toen Campbell zag dat ze de dubbele dosis hadden toegeschreven zei hij niet meer dan "hmmm... dat is merkwaardig...." en toen ging hij weer verder met z'n verhaal.

[ Bericht 1% gewijzigd door Probably_on_pcp op 07-06-2021 22:05:41 ]
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_199836173
Ivermectin obliterates 97 percent of Delhi cases



A 97% decline in Delhi cases with Ivermectin is decisive - period. It represents the last word in an epic struggle to save lives and preserve human rights. This graph symbolizes the victory of reason over corruption, good over evil, and right over wrong. It is as significant as David’s victory over Goliath. It is an absolute vindication of Ivermectin and early outpatient treatment. It is a clear refutation of the WHO, FDA, NIH, and CDC's policies of "wait at home until you turn blue" before you get treatment.

Dr. Pierre Kory told the world on December 8, 2020, that Ivermectin "obliterates" this virus. Obliterate means to decimate, demolish, or annihilate. It means to eliminate or destroy all trace, indication, or significance.

This graph shows that Ivermectin, used in Delhi beginning April 20, obliterated their COVID crisis. No one should be able to talk you out of this - not a salesman, a drug company, a television celebrity doc, and certainly not the top doctor for the WHO or the NIH who is paid to do that.

Will you believe this 97% eradication graph, or will you believe the propaganda pitched by the Big Media, Big Pharma, the WHO, and the FDA, who share massive financial conflicts of interest – those who say there is insufficient evidence?

What evidence could be any clearer than a 97% reduction in five weeks? That number is better than the current vaccines and beyond the reach of most medicines.

The WHO cautioned India they were making a mistake by using Ivermectin. They told them it could be dangerous, that there was no evidence it worked. How many lies will you buy before you stand up for the truth?

The fatal mistake would have been to NOT use Ivermectin.

Mercifully they used it, and they saved Delhi. But tragically, Tamil Nadu did not, and their state was devastated. Their new cases rose from 10,986 to 36,184 – a tripling.

No one can hide that. Their refusal to use Ivermectin harmed them. Not only did Tamil Nadu's cases rise to the highest in India, but their deaths skyrocketed from 48 on April 20 to 474 on May 27 – a rise of ten-fold.

Meanwhile, Delhi's deaths IN THE SAME PERIOD fell from 277 to 117. So which advice would you have wanted your state to follow?

In America, Baylor’s Dr. Peter McCullough, Yale’s Dr. Harvey Risch, and Harvard’s Dr. George Fareed first advised early outpatient treatment in testimony to the US Senate on November 19, 2020. Dr. McCullough and his colleagues were the first in the world to publish an early outpatient treatment protocol for COVID-19.

https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(20)30673-2/fulltext

That protocol has since been revised by Dr. George Fareed and his dynamic associate, Dr. Brian Tyson. They have now saved 6,000 COVID patients in California’s Imperial Valley.

https://www.thedesertrevi(...)9a-f3e1151e98c3.html

Less than one month later, Dr. Pierre Kory sounded the alarm for a second time on December 8, 2020, to the US Senate. He advised the use of Ivermectin, yet no one listened. No Ivermectin guidelines were instituted. On December 8, the US suffered 2,821 COVID deaths. With Ivermectin, cases could have been quickly crushed. Fatalities would have dropped in short order, as the example of Delhi shows us.

But instead, the United States followed the WHO and FDA’s official advice and waited for the vaccines. They sat on their hands while people gasped. They watched and did nothing as millions turned blue and flooded the hospitals - no Ivermectin approval. So like Tamil Nadu, our US cases and deaths also skyrocketed.

By January 8, just four weeks later, US daily cases had risen from 219,000 to 300,000, and deaths were up from 2,821 to 3,895. Even more Americans were to die due to this failed health policy of ignoring Ivermectin and early outpatient treatment.

Delhi did it right. The United States and Tamil Nadu did it wrong. It cost half a million precious lives and horrific pain and suffering for the world. The pandemic was prolonged for no good reason.

Now we are in a different position. We as a people have absolute evidence of Ivermectin’s efficacy. In Delhi, we heard not one single story of Ivermectin being toxic or causing any difficulty. On the contrary, it is safe, and it saved tens of thousands from COVID.

But more immediately, what can we do now? What will you do as a concerned citizen to get the word out? What can you do to save your fellow human beings from repeating these costly errors? Start with sharing the book, Ivermectin for the World, with your church, your minister, and all your social contacts. Then, spread the word far and wide:

People can safely take Ivermectin to prevent and treat COVID-19.

The rest of the world must hear about Ivermectin as new areas experience similar surges. A new hybrid variant is brewing in Vietnam. Notify them! They need to know there is more than masks and social distancing. There is more than waiting for vaccines. Ivermectin is effective against ALL the variants. The vaccines ARE NOT.

But, unfortunately, the authorities will continue to censor this information; thus, the responsibility of getting the word out rests squarely upon the citizens of the planet, you and me.

https://www.amazon.com/Iv(...)-ebook/dp/B0943T564G

Lead a peaceful protest. Share this article with everyone you know, your social media, your email contacts, relatives, friends, and co-workers. You may think that none of this applies to you because you have already been vaccinated. That is unfortunately not true.

Listen to Dr. Peter McCullough on this subject. He is the Vice-Chair of Medicine at Baylor University Medical Center in Dallas, Texas. He is among the most published cardiologists in the world. He is arguably the most courageous physician to speak out.

https://vimeo.com/553518199

No one deserves COVID. No one deserves to die when we have effective treatment.

Do you continue to believe the pronouncements of those agencies that have failed you so many times before? Those agencies who have told the media to give you only filtered information, those agencies who have ignored the world's leading scientists.

Take a look at this graph. Delhi was in dire straits on April 20 with 28,395 new daily COVID-19 cases and rising.

We sounded the alarm. The All India Institute for Medical Science (AIIMS) and the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) had the guts to listen. They listened to the 56 studies involving 18,447 patients showing up to a 91% reduction in death with Ivermectin. They listened to scientists like Dr. Pierre Kory and the FLCCC. They listened to world-class experts like Dr. Tess Lawrie of the BIRD group and Dr. Peter McCullough of the C19 group. They were smart.

The book Ivermectin for the World was released May 1, 2021, and called for the urgent adoption of Ivermectin by India on a humanitarian basis to save lives. "What we could not do for America, we can do for India!" was our mantra.

And we did! This is what happened to cases in the areas that chose Ivermectin:

Delhi : ¯ 97% [28,395 to 956]

Uttar Pradesh: ¯ 95% [37,944 to 2,014]

Goa: ¯ 85% [4195 to 645]

Karnataka: ¯ 60% [50,112 to 20,378]

Uttarakhand: ¯ 87% [9,642 to 1,226]

Observe what happened to those areas that DID NOT choose Ivermectin:

Tamil Nadu ­ 173% [10,986 to 30,016]

Odisha ­ 50% [4,761 to 7,148]

Assam ­ 240% [1,651 to 5,613]

Arunachal Pradesh ­ 656% [ 61 to 461]

Tripura ­ 828% [92 to 854]

On May 3, the FLCCC and the BIRD groups issued a press release and called for the immediate global use of Ivermectin for COVID-19. On May 7, Dr. Paul Marik, the second most published Intensive Care Specialist in the world and founding member of the FLCCC, did the same. He added that we could no longer trust “larger health authorities to make an honest examination of the medical and scientific evidence.”

https://eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2021-05/fccc-lpr050621.php

In India, the acid test was to compare the fates of those Indian areas that adopted the drug versus those that did not. This would be the ultimate natural experiment. Finally, the plain truth would be revealed to all the world. It was no longer the special interests, Big Pharma, Big Regulators, and Big Media, who had been censoring, swindling, and conniving. Now the fight would be fair because all the money in the world could not conceal the cases in Delhi. The world had a front-row seat to witness these results. And it bears repeating; the results are in.

Delhi’s cases are down 97% from 28,395 on April 20 to just 956 on May 29.

So the question now is this: Are you going to believe the obvious contained in these graphs? Or are you going to believe those corrupt agencies that do not have your best interests at heart, those who have lied to you many times before?

The choice is clear. Ivermectin is the safe, repurposed Nobel Prize-Winning drug that effectively reduces death up to 91% from COVID-19. It does not produce blood clots, heart attacks, or strokes. It does not cause violent immune reactions. And it reduced the COVID-19 cases in Delhi, India, by an astonishing 97% in five weeks. It costs pennies.

Tell the poor citizens of Tamil Nadu who are still in the dark and remain forbidden from using it. Tell the rest of the world. Show your doctor the studies. They are updated daily on www.ivmmeta.com. If your doctor refuses, find another doctor.

Listen to scientists and physicians who are driven by their Hippocratic Oaths to do what is right, not the doctors who are paid vast sums of money by lucrative interests to tow the party line.

So the next time you hear a highly paid doctor advising you that Ivermectin does not work, or you read another article disputing this, please believe your eyes and this graph.

Use your common sense. Some truths are self-evident, and Ivermectin's pronounced effect against this virus is one of them. Another self-evident truth, straight from the Declaration of Independence, is the human right to life - which includes the right to select medical treatment - free from governmental interference.

We do not require scientists to interpret these fundamental truths. We do not need a philosopher to know that censorship of life-saving information is wrong. We do not require any more "studies" to understand that all the world needs Ivermectin - immediately.

“What we did for India, we must now do for the rest of the world!”


https://www.thedesertrevi(...)6d-2722d2325a08.html
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_200511765
Australische politicus die laat zien, aan de hand van onderzoek, dat Ivermectine een prima middel is!

twitter
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_200515888
Ivermectin wordt gemaakt door big Pharma en is onderdeel van het complot.
Het enige wat echt werkt is vitamine D van zonlicht en dennennaaldenthee
Do not go gentle into that good night
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
  zaterdag 24 juli 2021 @ 09:53:40 #63
140043 Isdatzo
Born in the echoes.
pi_200516220
quote:
0s.gif Op vrijdag 11 juni 2021 20:00 schreef Probably_on_pcp het volgende:
Ivermectin obliterates 97 percent of Delhi cases
Hier gestopt met lezen.
Huilen dan.
pi_200516223
quote:
0s.gif Op vrijdag 11 juni 2021 20:00 schreef Probably_on_pcp het volgende:
Ivermectin obliterates 97 percent of Delhi cases

[ afbeelding ]

A 97% decline in Delhi cases with Ivermectin is decisive - period. It represents the last word in an epic struggle to save lives and preserve human rights. This graph symbolizes the victory of reason over corruption, good over evil, and right over wrong. It is as significant as David’s victory over Goliath. It is an absolute vindication of Ivermectin and early outpatient treatment. It is a clear refutation of the WHO, FDA, NIH, and CDC's policies of "wait at home until you turn blue" before you get treatment.

Dr. Pierre Kory told the world on December 8, 2020, that Ivermectin "obliterates" this virus. Obliterate means to decimate, demolish, or annihilate. It means to eliminate or destroy all trace, indication, or significance.

This graph shows that Ivermectin, used in Delhi beginning April 20, obliterated their COVID crisis. No one should be able to talk you out of this - not a salesman, a drug company, a television celebrity doc, and certainly not the top doctor for the WHO or the NIH who is paid to do that.

Will you believe this 97% eradication graph, or will you believe the propaganda pitched by the Big Media, Big Pharma, the WHO, and the FDA, who share massive financial conflicts of interest – those who say there is insufficient evidence?

What evidence could be any clearer than a 97% reduction in five weeks? That number is better than the current vaccines and beyond the reach of most medicines.

The WHO cautioned India they were making a mistake by using Ivermectin. They told them it could be dangerous, that there was no evidence it worked. How many lies will you buy before you stand up for the truth?

The fatal mistake would have been to NOT use Ivermectin.

Mercifully they used it, and they saved Delhi. But tragically, Tamil Nadu did not, and their state was devastated. Their new cases rose from 10,986 to 36,184 – a tripling.

No one can hide that. Their refusal to use Ivermectin harmed them. Not only did Tamil Nadu's cases rise to the highest in India, but their deaths skyrocketed from 48 on April 20 to 474 on May 27 – a rise of ten-fold.

Meanwhile, Delhi's deaths IN THE SAME PERIOD fell from 277 to 117. So which advice would you have wanted your state to follow?

In America, Baylor’s Dr. Peter McCullough, Yale’s Dr. Harvey Risch, and Harvard’s Dr. George Fareed first advised early outpatient treatment in testimony to the US Senate on November 19, 2020. Dr. McCullough and his colleagues were the first in the world to publish an early outpatient treatment protocol for COVID-19.

https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(20)30673-2/fulltext

That protocol has since been revised by Dr. George Fareed and his dynamic associate, Dr. Brian Tyson. They have now saved 6,000 COVID patients in California’s Imperial Valley.

https://www.thedesertrevi(...)9a-f3e1151e98c3.html

Less than one month later, Dr. Pierre Kory sounded the alarm for a second time on December 8, 2020, to the US Senate. He advised the use of Ivermectin, yet no one listened. No Ivermectin guidelines were instituted. On December 8, the US suffered 2,821 COVID deaths. With Ivermectin, cases could have been quickly crushed. Fatalities would have dropped in short order, as the example of Delhi shows us.

But instead, the United States followed the WHO and FDA’s official advice and waited for the vaccines. They sat on their hands while people gasped. They watched and did nothing as millions turned blue and flooded the hospitals - no Ivermectin approval. So like Tamil Nadu, our US cases and deaths also skyrocketed.

By January 8, just four weeks later, US daily cases had risen from 219,000 to 300,000, and deaths were up from 2,821 to 3,895. Even more Americans were to die due to this failed health policy of ignoring Ivermectin and early outpatient treatment.

Delhi did it right. The United States and Tamil Nadu did it wrong. It cost half a million precious lives and horrific pain and suffering for the world. The pandemic was prolonged for no good reason.

Now we are in a different position. We as a people have absolute evidence of Ivermectin’s efficacy. In Delhi, we heard not one single story of Ivermectin being toxic or causing any difficulty. On the contrary, it is safe, and it saved tens of thousands from COVID.

But more immediately, what can we do now? What will you do as a concerned citizen to get the word out? What can you do to save your fellow human beings from repeating these costly errors? Start with sharing the book, Ivermectin for the World, with your church, your minister, and all your social contacts. Then, spread the word far and wide:

People can safely take Ivermectin to prevent and treat COVID-19.

The rest of the world must hear about Ivermectin as new areas experience similar surges. A new hybrid variant is brewing in Vietnam. Notify them! They need to know there is more than masks and social distancing. There is more than waiting for vaccines. Ivermectin is effective against ALL the variants. The vaccines ARE NOT.

But, unfortunately, the authorities will continue to censor this information; thus, the responsibility of getting the word out rests squarely upon the citizens of the planet, you and me.

https://www.amazon.com/Iv(...)-ebook/dp/B0943T564G

Lead a peaceful protest. Share this article with everyone you know, your social media, your email contacts, relatives, friends, and co-workers. You may think that none of this applies to you because you have already been vaccinated. That is unfortunately not true.

Listen to Dr. Peter McCullough on this subject. He is the Vice-Chair of Medicine at Baylor University Medical Center in Dallas, Texas. He is among the most published cardiologists in the world. He is arguably the most courageous physician to speak out.

https://vimeo.com/553518199

No one deserves COVID. No one deserves to die when we have effective treatment.

Do you continue to believe the pronouncements of those agencies that have failed you so many times before? Those agencies who have told the media to give you only filtered information, those agencies who have ignored the world's leading scientists.

Take a look at this graph. Delhi was in dire straits on April 20 with 28,395 new daily COVID-19 cases and rising.

We sounded the alarm. The All India Institute for Medical Science (AIIMS) and the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) had the guts to listen. They listened to the 56 studies involving 18,447 patients showing up to a 91% reduction in death with Ivermectin. They listened to scientists like Dr. Pierre Kory and the FLCCC. They listened to world-class experts like Dr. Tess Lawrie of the BIRD group and Dr. Peter McCullough of the C19 group. They were smart.

The book Ivermectin for the World was released May 1, 2021, and called for the urgent adoption of Ivermectin by India on a humanitarian basis to save lives. "What we could not do for America, we can do for India!" was our mantra.

And we did! This is what happened to cases in the areas that chose Ivermectin:

Delhi : ¯ 97% [28,395 to 956]

Uttar Pradesh: ¯ 95% [37,944 to 2,014]

Goa: ¯ 85% [4195 to 645]

Karnataka: ¯ 60% [50,112 to 20,378]

Uttarakhand: ¯ 87% [9,642 to 1,226]

Observe what happened to those areas that DID NOT choose Ivermectin:

Tamil Nadu ­ 173% [10,986 to 30,016]

Odisha ­ 50% [4,761 to 7,148]

Assam ­ 240% [1,651 to 5,613]

Arunachal Pradesh ­ 656% [ 61 to 461]

Tripura ­ 828% [92 to 854]

On May 3, the FLCCC and the BIRD groups issued a press release and called for the immediate global use of Ivermectin for COVID-19. On May 7, Dr. Paul Marik, the second most published Intensive Care Specialist in the world and founding member of the FLCCC, did the same. He added that we could no longer trust “larger health authorities to make an honest examination of the medical and scientific evidence.”

https://eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2021-05/fccc-lpr050621.php

In India, the acid test was to compare the fates of those Indian areas that adopted the drug versus those that did not. This would be the ultimate natural experiment. Finally, the plain truth would be revealed to all the world. It was no longer the special interests, Big Pharma, Big Regulators, and Big Media, who had been censoring, swindling, and conniving. Now the fight would be fair because all the money in the world could not conceal the cases in Delhi. The world had a front-row seat to witness these results. And it bears repeating; the results are in.

Delhi’s cases are down 97% from 28,395 on April 20 to just 956 on May 29.

So the question now is this: Are you going to believe the obvious contained in these graphs? Or are you going to believe those corrupt agencies that do not have your best interests at heart, those who have lied to you many times before?

The choice is clear. Ivermectin is the safe, repurposed Nobel Prize-Winning drug that effectively reduces death up to 91% from COVID-19. It does not produce blood clots, heart attacks, or strokes. It does not cause violent immune reactions. And it reduced the COVID-19 cases in Delhi, India, by an astonishing 97% in five weeks. It costs pennies.

Tell the poor citizens of Tamil Nadu who are still in the dark and remain forbidden from using it. Tell the rest of the world. Show your doctor the studies. They are updated daily on www.ivmmeta.com. If your doctor refuses, find another doctor.

Listen to scientists and physicians who are driven by their Hippocratic Oaths to do what is right, not the doctors who are paid vast sums of money by lucrative interests to tow the party line.

So the next time you hear a highly paid doctor advising you that Ivermectin does not work, or you read another article disputing this, please believe your eyes and this graph.

Use your common sense. Some truths are self-evident, and Ivermectin's pronounced effect against this virus is one of them. Another self-evident truth, straight from the Declaration of Independence, is the human right to life - which includes the right to select medical treatment - free from governmental interference.

We do not require scientists to interpret these fundamental truths. We do not need a philosopher to know that censorship of life-saving information is wrong. We do not require any more "studies" to understand that all the world needs Ivermectin - immediately.

“What we did for India, we must now do for the rest of the world!”


https://www.thedesertrevi(...)6d-2722d2325a08.html
Grappig, aantal doden en infecties verminderd in lijn met de lockdowns en vaccinaties en jij denkt dat het komt door ivermectin. Een medicijn dat pas gegeven wordt na besmetting en dus geen invloed heeft op het aantal besmettingen.
logischerwijs zou je toch zeggen dat minder besmettingen is minder ziekenhuisopname is minder doden.
Do not go gentle into that good night
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
pi_200597683
Ivermectin Docks to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Receptor-binding Domain Attached to ACE2

Abstract
Background/aim: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). One drug that has attracted interest is the antiparasitic compound ivermectin, a macrocyclic lactone derived from the bacterium Streptomyces avermitilis. We carried out a docking study to determine if ivermectin might be able to attach to the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound with ACE2.

Materials and methods: We used the program AutoDock Vina Extended to perform the docking study.

Results: Ivermectin docked in the region of leucine 91 of the spike and histidine 378 of the ACE2 receptor. The binding energy of ivermectin to the spike-ACE2 complex was -18 kcal/mol and binding constant was 5.8 e-08.

Conclusion:
The ivermectin docking we identified may interfere with the attachment of the spike to the human cell membrane. Clinical trials now underway should determine whether ivermectin is an effective treatment for SARS-Cov2 infection.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32871846/
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_200597768
Doctors Raise Awareness on Ivermectin Treatment for COVID-19

In an effort to help end the pandemic, an international coalition of medical experts is holding worldwide events Saturday to raise awareness about the effectiveness of ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19.

Organizers of the World Ivermectin Day say doctors and supporters of the inexpensive FDA-approved drug will host free online and public events in over a dozen countries.

Two nonprofits—Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care (FLCCC) Alliance and the British Ivermectin Recommendation Development (BIRD) group—who have been campaigning for the off-label use of ivermectin to prevent and treat COVID-19 say the event’s focus is to let more people know that the antiparasitic drug can treat COVID-19, possibly end the pandemic, and help eliminate fear of the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus.

“We have an incredibly positive and uplifting message to share: ivermectin treats and prevents COVID and it is the key to unlocking the never-ending cycle of pandemic peaks and personal restrictions and will help restart economies,” Dr. Tess Lawrie, cofounder of the BIRD group said in a press release.

Lawrie is also a co-author of a peer-reviewed meta-analysis study published in the American Journal of Therapeutics that found ivermectin to be effective against COVID-19, the disease caused by the CCP virus. Lawrie and her team concluded with a moderate level of confidence that ivermectin reduced the risk of death by an average of 62 percent, at a 95 percent confidence interval of 0.19-0.73, especially when prescribed early.



FLCCC Alliance also conducted their own review of 18 randomized controlled trials on COVID-19 treatment with ivermectin. They found “large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance.” The authors also said that studies on the prevention of COVID-19 reported significantly reduced risks of the disease with regular use of the drug.

Gaat verder:

https://www.theepochtimes(...)sharemorningbriefnoe
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_200692635
quote:
0s.gif Op woensdag 28 juli 2021 14:37 schreef Probably_on_pcp het volgende:
Doctors Raise Awareness on Ivermectin Treatment for COVID-19

onzin
ONdertussen in Zuid Afrika

https://www.sowetanlive.c(...)tin-continue-to-die/
Do not go gentle into that good night
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
pi_200761222
Israeli scientist says COVID-19 could be treated for under $1/day

Double-blind study shows ivermectin reduces disease’s duration and infectiousness • FDA and WHO caution against its use

Ivermectin, a drug used to fight parasites in third-world countries, could help reduce the length of infection for people who contract coronavirus for less than a $1 a day, according to recent research by Sheba Medical Center in Tel Hashomer.

Prof. Eli Schwartz, founder of the Center for Travel Medicine and Tropical Disease at Sheba, conducted a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial from May 15, 2020, through the end of January 2021 to evaluate the effectiveness of ivermectin in reducing viral shedding among nonhospitalized patients with mild to moderate COVID-19.

Ivermectin has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration since 1987. The drug’s discoverers were awarded the 2015 Nobel Prize in medicine for its treatment of onchocerciasis, a disease caused by infection with a parasitic roundworm.

Over the years, it has been used for other indications, including scabies and head lice. Moreover, in the last decade, several clinical studies have started to show its antiviral activity against viruses ranging from HIV and the flu to Zika and West Nile.

The drug is also extremely economical. A study published in the peer-reviewed American Journal of Therapeutics showed that the cost of ivermectin for other treatments in Bangladesh is around $0.60 to $1.80 for a five-day course. It costs up to $10 a day in Israel, Schwartz said.

In Schwartz’s study, some 89 eligible volunteers over the age of 18 who were diagnosed with coronavirus and staying in state-run COVID-19 hotels were divided into two groups: 50% received ivermectin, and 50% received a placebo, according to their weight. They were given the pills for three days in a row, an hour before a meal.
The volunteers were tested using a standard nasopharyngeal swab PCR test with the goal of evaluating whether there was a reduction in viral load by the sixth day – the third day after termination of the treatment. They were swabbed every two days.

Nearly 72% of volunteers treated with ivermectin tested negative for the virus by day six. In contrast, only 50% of those who received the placebo tested negative.

IN ADDITION, the study looked at culture viability, meaning how infectious the patients were, and found that only 13% of ivermectin patients were infectious after six days, compared with 50% of the placebo group – almost four times as many.

“Our study shows first and foremost that ivermectin has antiviral activity,” Schwartz said. “It also shows that there is almost a 100% chance that a person will be noninfectious in four to six days, which could lead to shortening isolation time for these people. This could have a huge economic and social impact.”

The study appeared on the MedRxiv health-research sharing site. It has not yet been peer reviewed.
Schwartz said other similar studies – though not all of them conducted to the same double-blind and placebo standards as his – also showed a favorable impact of ivermectin treatment.

His study did not prove ivermectin was effective as a prophylactic, meaning that it could prevent disease, he cautioned, nor did it show that it reduces the chances of hospitalization. However, other studies have shown such evidence, he added.

For example, the study published earlier this year in the American Journal of Therapeutics highlighted that “a review by the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance summarized findings from 27 studies on the effects of ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 infection, concluding that ivermectin ‘demonstrates a strong signal of therapeutic efficacy’ against COVID-19.”

“Another recent review found that ivermectin reduced deaths by 75%,” the report said.

BUT IVERMECTIN is not without controversy, and hence, despite the high levels of coronavirus worldwide, neither the FDA nor the World Health Organization have been willing to approve it for use in the fight against the virus.
Prof. Ya’acov Nahmias, a Hebrew University of Jerusalem researcher, has questioned the safety of the drug.
“Ivermectin is a chemical therapeutic agent, and it has significant risks associated with it,” he said in a previous interview. “We should be very cautious about using this type of medication to treat a viral disease that the vast majority of the public is going to recover from even without this treatment.”

During Schwartz’s study, there was not any signal of significant side effects among ivermectin users.
Only five patients were referred to hospitals, with four of them being in the placebo arm. One ivermectin patient went to the hospital complaining of shortness of breath on the day of recruitment. He continued with the ivermectin treatment and was sent back to the hotel a day later in good condition.

The FDA said on its website it “received multiple reports of patients who have required medical support and been hospitalized after self-medicating with ivermectin.”

The “FDA has not approved ivermectin for use in treating or preventing COVID-19 in humans,” it said. “Ivermectin tablets are approved at very specific doses for some parasitic worms, and there are topical (on the skin) formulations for head lice and skin conditions like rosacea. Ivermectin is not an antiviral (a drug for treating viruses). Taking large doses of this drug is dangerous and can cause serious harm.”

The World Health Organization has also recommended against using the drug except in clinical trials.

IN CONTRAST, Schwartz said he was very disappointed that the WHO did not support any trial to determine whether the drug could be viable.

Last month, Oxford University announced a large trial on ivermectin effectiveness.

Schwartz said he became interested in exploring ivermectin about a year ago, “when everyone was looking for a new drug” to treat COVID-19, and a lot of effort was being put into evaluating hydroxychloroquine, so he decided to join the effort.

“Since ivermectin was on my shelf, since we are using it for tropical diseases, and there were hints it might work, I decided to go for it,” he said.

Researchers in other places worldwide began looking into the drug at around the same time. But when they started to see positive results, no one wanted to publish them, Schwartz said.

“There is a lot of opposition,” he said. “We tried to publish it, and it was kicked away by three journals. No one even wanted to hear about it. You have to ask how come when the world is suffering.”

“This drug will not bring any big economic profits,” and so Big Pharma doesn’t want to deal with it, he said.
SOME OF the loudest opposition to ivermectin has come from Merck Co., which manufactured the drug in the 1980s. In a public statement about ivermectin on its website in February, it said: “Company scientists continue to carefully examine the findings of all available and emerging studies of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 for evidence of efficacy and safety. It is important to note that, to date, our analysis has identified no scientific basis for a potential therapeutic effect against COVID-19 from pre-clinical studies; no meaningful evidence for clinical activity or clinical efficacy in patients with COVID-19 disease, and a concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies.”

But Merck has not launched any studies of its own on ivermectin.

“You would think Merck would be happy to hear that ivermectin might be helpful to corona patients and try to study it, but they are most loudly declaring the drug should not be used,” Schwartz said. “A billion people took it. They gave it to them. It’s a real shame.”

And not moving forward with ivermectin could potentially extend the time it takes for the world to be able to live alongside the virus, he said.

“Developing new medications can take years; therefore, identifying existing drugs that can be re-purposed against COVID-19 [and] that already have an established safety profile through decades of use could play a critical role in suppressing or even ending the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic,” wrote the researchers in the American Journal of Therapeutics. “Using re-purposed medications may be especially important because it could take months, possibly years, for much of the world’s population to get vaccinated, particularly among low- to middle-income populations.”

https://www.jpost.com/hea(...)or-under-1day-675612
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_200761447
Tering zijn er nog steeds mensen die hierin geloven...
Mijn blog over o.a. leven met OCD (dwang) | https://mdj-stek.nl
pi_200763144
POP, heb jij geen werk of zo, en heb je tijd te veel?

Want dat merk ik op dit forum, de wappies hebben blijkbaar zoveel tijd om onzin te posten. Vaak voor zichzelf, want niemand reageert. En als er iemand reageert op een kritische toon dan lijkt het de wappies niks te deren. Die gaan vrolijk verder.
Zo is elders een topic te lezen waarin mensen nog steeds hopen dat Trump de nieuwe president wordt _O-

Als jullie je tijd nou eens zouden benutten voor het schrijven van sollicitatiebrieven. Werk genoeg, als je maar wilt.
pi_200763326
God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them;
pi_200764715
quote:
0s.gif Op donderdag 5 augustus 2021 21:23 schreef wappie1986 het volgende:
POP, heb jij geen werk of zo, en heb je tijd te veel?

Want dat merk ik op dit forum, de wappies hebben blijkbaar zoveel tijd om onzin te posten. Vaak voor zichzelf, want niemand reageert. En als er iemand reageert op een kritische toon dan lijkt het de wappies niks te deren. Die gaan vrolijk verder.
Zo is elders een topic te lezen waarin mensen nog steeds hopen dat Trump de nieuwe president wordt _O-

Als jullie je tijd nou eens zouden benutten voor het schrijven van sollicitatiebrieven. Werk genoeg, als je maar wilt.
Nou het wordt pas echt zielig als je bedenkt dat sukkels zoals jij en je vacciewappie vriendjes jullie kostbare vrije tijd doorbrengen in topics die je eigenlijk puur onzin vinden. 8)7
I understand how you feel. You see, it's all very clear to me now. The whole thing. It's wonderful.
pi_200765415
Do not go gentle into that good night
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
pi_200765445
Death by ivermectin

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9186403/

Artikelen vanaf de jaren 90

Veel plezier met je falende lever :W
Do not go gentle into that good night
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
pi_200782474
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.31.21258081v1

Conclusions There were significantly lower viral loads and viable cultures in the ivermectin group, which could lead to shortening isolation time in these patients.

God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them;
pi_200782599
quote:
0s.gif Op vrijdag 6 augustus 2021 21:28 schreef Alarmonoff het volgende:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.31.21258081v1

Conclusions There were significantly lower viral loads and viable cultures in the ivermectin group, which could lead to shortening isolation time in these patients.

[ afbeelding ]
Alleen de eerste comment al

quote:
There are several numerical discrepancies and questions about methods that should be resolved before any conclusions can be drawn from the study.

When was it decided to exclude patients whose RT-PCR results had a cycle threshold value >35 in the first two consecutive [tests]? When was it decided to adjust the Kaplan–Meier analysis for symptom onset?

Please reconcile the discrepancy between the "mild" in study title and the "mild to moderate" in the description of the mandate of the isolation hotels. The inclusion criteria do not appear to specify the severity of disease, which would apparently then depend on the admission criteria of the hotels.

In Table 1, stated percentages of patients who are male do not match raw numbers of 69/89 for all patients and 36/47 for ivermectin, respectively; instead (corresponding to females accounting for 21.6% in the abstract) 78.4% = 69/88, and 78.3% = 36/46.

The abstract says 16.8% were asymptomatic at baseline, which does not complement the 80.9% symptomatic in Table 1, nor the 69 symptomatic patients in Figure 3. Perhaps I am missing something, but it is not clear why 37 and 35 symptomatic patients in Table 1 do not match the numbers of subjects at risk, 36 and 33, on Day 0 in Figure 3.

Table 2 presents results from RT-PCR testing at days 4 to 10. Day 2 is said to have been added to the protocol along with Day 4, but no explanation is given for why data from Days 2, 12, and 14 are not also shown in the table.

I'm not a specialist in lab tests, but I'm afraid I am having trouble understanding the post hoc analysis based on a convenience sample of 16 samples on Day 0. Does Table S2 mean there were then 26 samples taken on Day 2?

I am mildly puzzled by the alignment of the dots in Figure 2: most appear to lie on a grid, but a few sets of points are slightly raised or lowered. Is this a normal occurrence?
Oh en vwb India... Die doen al maanden geen Ivermectin meer. Waarom? Simpel het werkt niet

Do not go gentle into that good night
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
pi_200816213
twitter
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_200816231
Favorable outcome on viral load and culture viability using Ivermectin in early treatment of non-hospitalized patients with mild COVID-19 – A double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial

Background
Ivermectin, an anti-parasitic agent, also has anti-viral properties. Our aim was to assess whether ivermectin can shorten the viral shedding in patients at an early-stage of COVID-19 infection.

Methods
The double-blinded trial compared patients receiving ivermectin 0·2 mg/kg for 3 days vs. placebo in non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients. RT-PCR from a nasopharyngeal swab was obtained at recruitment and then every two days. Primary endpoint was reduction of viral-load on the 6th day (third day after termination of treatment) as reflected by Ct level>30 (non-infectious level). The primary outcome was supported by determination of viral culture viability.

Results
Eighty-nine patients were eligible (47 in ivermectin and 42 in placebo arm). Their median age was 35 years. Females accounted for 21·6%, and 16·8% were asymptomatic at recruitment. Median time from symptom onset was 4 days. There were no statistical differences in these parameters between the two groups.

On day 6, 34 out of 47 (72%) patients in the ivermectin arm reached the endpoint, compared to 21/ 42 (50%) in the placebo arm (OR 2·62; 95% CI: 1·09-6·31). In a multivariable logistic-regression model, the odds of a negative test at day 6 was 2.62 time higher in the ivermectin group (95% CI: 1·06–6·45). Cultures at days 2 to 6 were positive in 3/23 (13·0%) of ivermectin samples vs. 14/29 (48·2%) in the placebo group (p=0·008).

Conclusions
There were significantly lower viral loads and viable cultures in the ivermectin group, which could lead to shortening isolation time in these patients.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.31.21258081v1
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_200910169
Ivermectin Wins in India

News of India's defeat of the Delta variant should be common knowledge. It is just about as obvious as the nose on one's face. It is so clear when one looks at the graphs that no one can deny it.

Yet, for some reason, we are not allowed to talk about it. Thus, for example, Wikipedia cannot mention the peer-reviewed meta-analyses by Dr. Tess Lawrie or Dr. Pierre Kory published in the American Journal of Therapeutics.

https://www.thedesertrevi(...)75-d7b0b1f2ff67.html

Wikipedia is not allowed to publish the recent meta-analysis on Ivermectin authored by Dr. Andrew Hill. Furthermore, it is not allowed to say anything concerning www.ivmmeta.com showing the 61 studies comprising 23,000 patients which reveal up to a 96% reduction in death [prophylaxis] with Ivermectin.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3AIvermectin

One can see the bias in Wikipedia by going on the "talk" pages for each subject and reading about the fierce attempts of editors to add these facts and the stone wall refusals by the "senior" editors who have an agenda. And that agenda is not loyalty to your health.

The easy way to read the “talk” page on any Wikipedia subject is to click the top left “talk” button. Anyone can then review the editors’ discussions.

There is a blackout on any conversation about how Ivermectin beat COVID-19 in India. When I discussed the dire straits that India found itself in early this year with 414,000 cases per day, and over 4,000 deaths per day, and how that evaporated within five weeks of the addition of Ivermectin, I am often asked, "But why is there no mention of that in the news?"

Yes, exactly. Ask yourself why India’s success against the Delta variant with Ivermectin is such a closely guarded secret by the NIH and CDC. Second, ask yourself why no major media outlets reported this fact, but instead, tried to confuse you with false information by saying the deaths in India are 10 times greater than official reports.

https://www.npr.org/secti(...)imes-the-official-co

Perhaps NPR is trying so hard because NPR is essentially a government mouthpiece. The US government is “all-in” with vaccines with the enthusiasm of a 17th century Catholic Church “all-in” with a Geocentric Model of the Universe disputing Galileo. Claiming that India’s numbers are inaccurate might distract from the overwhelming success of Ivermectin.

But in the end, the truth matters. It mattered in 1616, and it matters in 2021.



The graphs and data from the Johns Hopkins University CSSE database do not lie. On the contrary, they provide a compelling trail of truth that no one can dispute, not even the NIH, CDC, FDA, and WHO.

Just as Galileo proved with his telescope that the earth was NOT the center of the Universe in 1616; today, the data from India shows that Ivermectin is effective, much more so than the vaccines. It not only prevents death, but it also prevents COVID infections, and it also is effective against the Delta Variant.

In 1616, you could not make up the telescopic images of Jupiter and its orbiting moons, nor could you falsify the crescent-shaped images of Venus and Mercury. These proved that the earth was NOT the center of the Universe – a truth the Catholic Church could not allow.

Likewise, the massive drop in cases and deaths in India to almost nothing after the addition of Ivermectin proved the drug's effectiveness. This is a truth that the NIH, CDC, and FDA cannot allow because it would endanger the vaccine policy.

Never mind that Ivermectin would save more lives with much less risk, much less cost, and it would end the pandemic quickly.

Let us look at the burgundy-colored graph of Uttar Pradesh. First, allow me to thank Juan Chamie, a highly-respected Cambridge-based data analyst, who created this graph from the JHU CSSE data. Uttar Pradesh is a state in India that contains 241 million people. The United States’ population is 331 million people. Therefore, Uttar Pradesh can be compared to the United States, with 2/3 of our population size.

This data shows how Ivermectin knocked their COVID-19 cases and deaths - which we know were Delta Variant - down to almost zero within weeks. A population comparable to the US went from about 35,000 cases and 350 deaths per day to nearly ZERO within weeks of adding Ivermectin to their protocol.

By comparison, the United States is the lower graph. On August 5, here in the good ol’ USA, blessed with the glorious vaccines, we have 127,108 new cases per day and 574 new deaths.

Let us look at the August 5 numbers from Uttar Pradesh with 2/3 of our population. Uttar Pradesh, using Ivermectin, had a total of 26 new cases and exactly THREE deaths. The US without Ivermectin has precisely 4889 times as many daily cases and 191 times as many deaths as Uttar Pradesh with Ivermectin.

It is not even close. Countries do orders of magnitude better WITH Ivermectin. It might be comparable to the difference in travel between using an automobile versus a horse and buggy.

Uttar Pradesh on Ivermectin: Population 240 Million [4.9% fully vaccinated]

COVID Daily Cases: 26

COVID Daily Deaths: 3

The United States off Ivermectin: Population 331 Million [50.5% fully vaccinated]

COVID Daily Cases: 127,108

COVID Daily Deaths: 574

Let us look at other Ivermectin using areas of India with numbers from August 5, 2021, compiled by the JHU CSSE:

Delhi on Ivermectin: Population 31 Million [15% fully vaccinated]

COVID Daily Cases: 61

COVID Daily Deaths: 2

Uttarakhand on Ivermectin: Population 11.4 Million [15% fully vaccinated]

COVID Daily Cases: 24

COVID Daily Deaths: 0

Now let us look at an area of India that rejected Ivermectin.

https://www.thehindu.com/(...)/article34561235.ece

Tamil Nadu announced they would reject Ivermectin and instead follow the dubious USA-style guidance of using Remdesivir. Knowing this, you might expect their numbers to be closer to the US, with more cases and more deaths. You would be correct. Tamil Nadu went on to lead India in COVID-19 cases.

https://www.thedesertrevi(...)11-ab378d521f9a.html

Tamil Nadu continues to suffer for its choice to reject Ivermectin. As a result, the Delta variant continues to ravage their citizens while it was virtually wiped out in the Ivermectin-using states. Likewise, in the United States, without Ivermectin, both the vaccinated and unvaccinated continue to spread the Delta variant like wildfire.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/(...)-thursday/index.html

Tamil Nadu off Ivermectin: Population 78.8 Million [6.9% fully vaccinated]

COVID Daily Cases: 1,997

COVID Daily Deaths: 33

Like the JHU CSSE data, Galileo's telescope did not lie either, and the truth can usually be found in plain sight. Ivermectin works, and it works exceedingly well. Harvard-trained virologist Dr. George Fareed and his associate, Dr. Brian Tyson of California's Imperial Valley, have saved 99.9% of their patients with a COVID Cocktail that includes Ivermectin. They have released versions of their new book published in the Desert Review that everyone should read.

https://www.thedesertrevi(...)51-cf0d67e94c25.html

I could talk about how every one of my patients who used Ivermectin recovered rapidly, about my most recent case who felt 90% better within 48 hours of adding the drug, but I won't. I could write about how Wikipedia censors more than Pravda, about how you should always read the "talk" section of EVERY Wikipedia article to go behind the scenes and understand what the editors DO NOT want you to read, but I will refrain.

I could write about VAERS and how it is so much easier to navigate by following Open VAERS or how Wikipedia has unfairly portrayed Dr. Peter McCullough, one of the world's sharpest and most credible doctors. But I will hold back.

https://www.openvaers.com/

I could also discuss our current cancer treatment system's dangers and how chemotherapy and radiation stimulate cancer stem cells and cancer recurrence. About how this information has been suppressed and how the addition of repurposed drug cocktails can help prevent this, but I digress.

https://www.amazon.com/Su(...)rposed/dp/0998055425

I could recite the history of early outpatient treatment of COVID-19 with repurposed drugs, including Ivermectin, with all the specifics, and EXACTLY WHY this lifesaving information has been censored, but instead, I will leave researching these topics to each of you readers as individuals.

https://www.amazon.com/Iv(...)R-Hope/dp/1737415909

Because you already know what will happen if you simply sit back and swallow what the media are feeding you. You MUST question what the government tells you, and always DO YOUR OWN research.

Following the 1616 Inquisition of Galileo, the Pope banned all books and letters that argued the sun was the center of the Universe instead of the Earth. Similarly, today, the FDA and WHO have banned any use of Ivermectin for COVID outside of a clinical trial.

https://www.fda.gov/consu(...)-or-prevent-covid-19

https://www.who.int/news-(...)thin-clinical-trials

YouTube and Wikipedia both consider Ivermectin for COVID as heresy.

“YouTube doesn’t allow content that spreads medical misinformation that contradicts local health authorities or the World Health Organization’s (WHO) medical information about COVID-19… Treatment misinformation: claims that Ivermectin is an effective treatment for COVID-19.”

Wikipedia defines heresy as: “any belief or theory that is strongly at variance with established beliefs or customs, in particular the accepted beliefs of a church or religious organization. The term is usually used in reference to violations of important religious teachings, but is also used of views strongly opposed to any generally accepted ideas. A heretic is a proponent of heresy.”

Heresy is disagreeing with the government, or their health authority, even if they are all wrong and even if their policies harm people. Today we no longer call it heresy; it is labeled as misinformation.

Galileo was found guilty of heresy and sentenced on June 22, 1633, to formal imprisonment, although this was commuted to house arrest, under which he remained for the rest of his life.

On August 7, 2021 Medpage Today published a new quiz, “Can COVID Misinformation Cost You Your Medical License?”

https://www.medpagetoday.com/quizzes/news-quiz/93943

https://www.thedesertrevi(...)ea-77d5e2519364.html
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_201117622
Ivermectin Wins in Court Again: For Human Rights

One dose of Ivermectin was all it took to get 81-year-old John Swanson off the ventilator. John’s wife Sandra could not believe it. His story is remarkably similar to other cases of patients who were on their way out with advanced COVID-19 but saved when Ivermectin was added.

Ralph Lorigo is the lawyer who now has won three court orders forcing New York hospitals to administer Ivermectin to dying patients. Incredibly, these three hospitals and their lawyers fought against the patients, arguing they did not have the right to receive the drug despite a valid prescription written by their doctors. In essence, the argument was that they did not have the right to try a potentially life-saving medication.

In each of the three cases, the New York State Supreme Court Justices sided with the patient, and in each of the three cases, the patients made near-miraculous recoveries after the Ivermectin was given. In each case, these patients were in the Intensive Care Unit on ventilators, unable to breathe on their own, and universally, after the drug was given, they rapidly improved and were able to breathe on their own.

Judith Smentkiewicz made national news in January when her family hired Lorigo after the hospital refused a fourth dose of Ivermectin. Smentkiewicz's son and daughter called Ivermectin a "miracle drug" in court papers. Attorney Lorigo and his associate Jon F. Minear reported, “This lady was on a ventilator, literally on her deathbed, before she was given this drug. As far as we’re concerned, the judge’s order saved this woman’s life.”

The family of Glenna "Sue" Dickinson happened to see a newspaper article of Judith's remarkable story, and they decided to try Ivermectin as well.

Sue Dickinson, 65, contracted COVID-19 on January 7, 2021. She suffered progressive worsening and was admitted to Rochester General Hospital on January 12. She continued to worsen and was placed on a ventilator on January 17. The hospital staff advised that her chances of survival were about 40 percent.

With nothing to lose, Natalie Kingdollar, Dickinson’s daughter, reached out to their family doctor, Tom Madejski, who wrote the prescription. The hospital refused to give Sue the Ivermectin. The legal team of Lorigo and Minear drafted an affidavit from Dr. Madejski and sought an injunction. State Supreme Court Justice Frank Caruso ordered the hospital to provide the Ivermectin.

Dickinson, like Swanson, and Smentkiewicz, came off the ventilator and improved as well. The family reported on Facebook that, "She’s making progress each day, and it’s Ivermectin and God making this happen.” She has since been released from the hospital.

Ivermectin is widely used by physicians, as there are now 51 studies from around the world, with 50 showing clear benefit and one showing neutral. However, the lone study showing a neutral effect was roundly criticized as flawed in an open letter signed by a group of 120 physicians.

Experts worldwide have called for the global and systematic use of Ivermectin to prevent and treat COVID-19. Physicians have recently written about a profit motive by regulatory agencies and Big Pharma to block cheap, safe, and effective treatments like Ivermectin and HCQ in favor of experimental and perhaps more dangerous and arguably less effective vaccines and medicines like Remdesivir. With Remdesivir costing $3,100 per dose and not reducing deaths, the choice of Ivermectin is a no-brainer say many doctors.

Ivermectin costs about $2 per dose. It is safer than Tylenol or most vitamins, says Dr. Pierre Kory of the FLCCC Alliance, a group of expert physicians promoting access and information through a nonprofit organization. Dr. Kory and Mr. Lorigo have teamed up to help other hospitalized patients gain access to the life-saving drug.

Dr. Fred Wagshul, a Yale-educated physician, is a pulmonary specialist and directs the Lung Center of America. He is also a founding member of the FLCCC Alliance. Dr. Wagshul notes that the typical dose for hospitalized patients is 0.3 mg of Ivermectin per kg of body weight for four days which works out to nine 3 mg tablets daily for four days in a typical 200-pound patient.

Dr. George Fareed, former Harvard professor, advocates combination therapy of Ivermectin with HCQ in outpatient cases. For the benefit of physician readers, the specific doses are provided in this link.

The big problem is that information promoting Ivermectin is often censored or silenced as quickly as it is provided. Facebook, Reddit, Change.org, YouTube, and others have recently taken down posts on Ivermectin citing violation of "community standards."

Physicians who employ good judgment and scientific studies are considered violators, as well as those who publish factual accounts of Ivermectin-based recovery stories. A recent article exposed the link between large pharmaceutical corporations and government regulatory agencies who have financial entanglements and massive conflicts of interest.

Gaat verder:

https://www.thedesertrevi(...)98-37c06f632875.html
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_201129831
Wat artikelen:

"Ivermectin is best taken as a single dose with a full glass (8 ounces) of water on an empty stomach (1 hour before breakfast), unless otherwise directed by your doctor." https://www.mayoclinic.or(...)per-use/drg-20064397

Meta-analysis on the efficacy of Ivermectin in treating Covid19: https://journals.lww.com/(...)atment_of.98040.aspx

A double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial shows that Ivermectin is able to cure covid within 6 days for most people: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.31.21258081v1

More evidence that Ivermectin treatment leads to much faster recovery from Covid19: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmv.26880

An NIH study reveals that a five-day course of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 may reduce the duration of illness: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33278625/

Ivermectin stops replication of covid: https://www.sciencedirect(...)ii/S0166354220302011

Ivermectin has anti-viral properties: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3888155/

Ivermectin binds to Covid19 proteins to block the virus: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7996102/

Ivermectin safe to give 12mg per day for 5 days: https://www.ijidonline.co(...)0%2932506-6/fulltext

Ivermectin safely administered 60mg per day for 6 months: https://www.tandfonline.c(...)0428194.2020.1786559
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_201160785
twitter
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_201160916
Ohio judge orders Cinci hospital to treat COVID-19 patient with Ivermectin, despite CDC warnings

A Butler County judge ruled in favor of a woman last week who sought to force a hospital to administer Ivermectin — an animal dewormer that federal regulators have warned against using in COVID-19 patients — to her husband after several weeks in the ICU with the disease.

Butler County Common Pleas Judge Gregory Howard ordered West Chester Hospital, part of the University of Cincinnati network, to treat Jeffrey Smith, 51, with Ivermectin. The order, filed Aug. 23, compels the hospital to provide Smith with 30mg of Ivermectin daily for three weeks.

The drug was originally developed to deworm livestock animals before doctors began using it against parasitic diseases among humans. Several researchers won a Nobel Prize in 2015 for establishing its efficacy in humans. It’s used to treat head lice, onchocerciasis (river blindness) and others.

Both the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have warned Americans against the use of Ivermectin to treat COVID-19, a viral disease. It’s unproven as a treatment, they say, and large doses of it can be dangerous and cause serious harm. A review of available literature conducted earlier this month by the journal Nature found there’s no certainty in the available data on potential benefits of Ivermectin.

The drug has grown in popularity among conservatives, fueled by endorsements from allies of former President Donald Trump like U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wisc. or Fox News personalities Laura Ingraham and Sean Hannity. The CDC warned reports of poisoning related to use of Ivermectin have increased threefold this year, spiking in July.

Gaat verder:

https://www.news5clevelan(...)despite-cdc-warnings
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_201160998
Ivermectin tablets to be distributed among Uttarakhand residents to prevent Covid, says state govt

The Uttarakhand government has announced that Ivermectin tablets will be distributed among the citizens of the state to prevent the spread of Covid-19.

he Uttarakhand government will be distributing Ivermectin, an antiparasitic drug, among the residents of the state as a preventive medicine against the spread of Covid-19, a senior official said.

The Uttarakhand government’s announcement comes after Goa and Karnataka issued similar directions.

The decision was taken on the recommendation of the state-level clinical technical committee, an order issued by Chief Secretary Om Prakash to all district magistrates said.

The panel has recommended the Ivermectin tablet as “mass chemoprophylaxis” to effectively control the surge of Covid-19 infection apart from the vaccination drive, the order said.

The 12 mg tablets of the drug will be distributed in a kit to all families through the health department and district magistrates, the order said.

Dosage
Usually, Ivermectin tablets have to be taken by adults and those above 15 years twice daily for three days after breakfast and dinner. One person will thus need six tablets and a family of four will need 24 tablets. Hence, each kit will contain two dozen tablets, the order said.

Children between 10-15 years will take only one tablet daily whereas those aged between 2 and 10 years can be administered the drug only after doctor's advice. The tablet cannot be given to children below two years, pregnant women and those suffering from liver diseases, it said.

The kit will come with directions on how to consume the medicine and dosage for different age groups. Information related to the daily distribution of the kits should be sent to the state nodal officer, the order said.

Goa
Goa Health Minister Vishwajit Rane had on Monday said all people above 18 years will be given Ivermectin drug irrespective of their coronavirus status to bring down the number of deaths due to the viral disease.

twitter


Gaat verder:

https://www.indiatoday.in(...)t-1801863-2021-05-12
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_201161112
Why COVID-19 is not so spread in Africa: How does Ivermectin affect it?

Abstract
Background: Scientists have so far been unable to determine the reason for the low number of
COVID-19 cases in Africa.


Objective:
To evaluate the impact of ivermectin interventions for onchocerciasis on the morbidity,
mortality, recovery, and fatality rates caused by COVID-19.

Method:
A retrospective statistical analysis study of the impact of ivermectin against COVID-19
between the 31 onchocerciasis-endemic countries using the community-directed treatment with
ivermectin (CDTI) and the non-endemic 22 countries in Africa. The morbidity, mortality, recovery
rate, and fatality rate caused by COVID-19 were calculated from the WHO situation report in Africa.
We investigated the onchocerciasis endemic 31 countries and the non-endemic 22 countries.
Statistical comparisons used by the Welch test of them in the two groups were made.

Results:
The morbidity and mortality were statistically significantly less in the 31 countries using
CDTI. The recovery and fatality rates were not statistically significant difference. The average life
expectancy was statistically significantly higher in the non-endemic countries.

Conclusions:
The morbidity and mortality in the onchocerciasis endemic countries are lesser than
those in the non-endemic ones. The community-directed onchocerciasis treatment with ivermectin is
the most reasonable explanation for the decrease in morbidity and fatality rate in Africa. In areas
where ivermectin is distributed to and used by the entire population, it leads to a significant
reduction in mortality.


https://www.medrxiv.org/c(...).21254377v1.full.pdf

"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_201161137
twitter
Plaats hier uw advertentie
pi_201161212
Discovery of berberine, abamectin and ivermectin as antivirals against chikungunya and other alphaviruses

Abstract
Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) is an arthritogenic arbovirus of the Alphavirus genus, which has infected millions of people after its re-emergence in the last decade. In this study, a BHK cell line containing a stable CHIKV replicon with a luciferase reporter was used in a high-throughput platform to screen approximately 3000 compounds. Following initial validation, 25 compounds were chosen as primary hits for secondary validation with wild type and reporter CHIKV infection, which identified three promising compounds.

Abamectin (EC50 = 1.5 μM) and ivermectin (EC50 = 0.6 μM) are fermentation products generated by a soil dwelling actinomycete, Streptomyces avermitilis, whereas berberine (EC50 = 1.8 μM) is a plant-derived isoquinoline alkaloid. They inhibited CHIKV replication in a dose-dependent manner and had broad antiviral activity against other alphaviruses - Semliki Forest virus and Sindbis virus. Abamectin and ivermectin were also active against yellow fever virus, a flavivirus.

These compounds caused reduced synthesis of CHIKV genomic and antigenomic viral RNA as well as downregulation of viral protein expression. Time of addition experiments also suggested that they act on the replication phase of the viral infectious cycle.

https://www.sciencedirect(...)ii/S0166354215300516
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_201176669
Interessant artikel over Ivermectin:

Ivermectin: enigmatic multifaceted ‘wonder’ drug continues to surprise and exceed expectations

Over the past decade, the global scientific community have begun to recognize the unmatched value of an extraordinary drug, ivermectin, that originates from a single microbe unearthed from soil in Japan. Work on ivermectin has seen its discoverer, Satoshi Ōmura, of Tokyo’s prestigious Kitasato Institute, receive the 2014 Gairdner Global Health Award and the 2015 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, which he shared with a collaborating partner in the discovery and development of the drug, William Campbell of Merck & Co. Incorporated.

Today, ivermectin is continuing to surprise and excite scientists, offering more and more promise to help improve global public health by treating a diverse range of diseases, with its unexpected potential as an antibacterial, antiviral and anti-cancer agent being particularly extraordinary.

Gaat verder:

https://www.nature.com/articles/ja201711
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_201234750
Safety and Efficacy of the combined use of ivermectin, dexamethasone, enoxaparin and aspirin against COVID 19

From the first outbreak in Wuhan (China) in December 2019, until today the number of deaths worldwide due to the coronavirus pandemic exceeds eight hundred thousand people and the number of infected people arises to more than 25 million.

No treatment tested worldwide has shown unquestionable efficacy in the fight against COVID 19, according to NICE reports.

We have designed an experimental treatment called IDEA based on four affordable drugs already available on the market in Argentina, based on the following rationale:

- Ivermectin solution at a relatively high dose to lower the viral load in all stages of COVID 19

- Dexamethasone 4-mg injection, as anti-inflammatory drug to treat hyperinflammatory reaction to COVID-infection

- Enoxaparin injection as anticoagulant to treat hypercoagulation in severe cases.

- Aspirin 250-mg tablets to prevent hypercoagulation in mild and moderate cases


Except for Ivermection oral solution, which was used in a higher dose than approved for parasitosis, all other drugs were used in the already approved dose and indication. Regarding Ivermectin safety, several oral studies have shown it to be safe even when used at daily doses much higher than those approved already.

A clinical study has been conducted on COVID-19 patients at Eurnekian Hospital in the Province of Buenos Aires, Argentina. The study protocol and its final outcomes are described in this article. Results were compared with published data and data from patients admitted to the hospital receiving other treatments.

None of the patient presenting mild symptoms needed to be hospitalized. Only one patient died (0.59 % of all included patients vs. 2.1 % overall mortality for the disease in Argentina today; 3.1 % of hospitalized patients vs. 26.8 % mortality in published data). IDEA protocol appears to be a useful alternative to prevent disease progression of COVID-19 when applied to mild cases and to decrease mortality in patients at all stages of the disease with a favorable risk-benefit ratio.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.09.10.20191619v1
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_201234759
Ivermectin treatment for Covid is now supported by 113 studies, 73 of which have been peer reviewed. This includes 63 controlled trials with a total of 26,398 patients, and 31 Randomized Controlled Trials. Here is a direct link to 51 of them

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41429-021-00430-5

https://iv.iiarjournals.org/content/34/5/3023.long

https://www.frontiersin.o(...)icb.2020.592908/full

https://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/10.2217/fvl-2020-0342

https://doi.org/10.2217/fvl-2020-0342

https://www.sciencedirect(...)ii/S0167488911001145

https://www.sciencedirect(...)219307211?via%3Dihub

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00210-020-01902-5

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41429-020-0336-z

https://www.sciencedirect(...)220302011?via%3Dihub

https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpt.1909

https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-73308/v1

https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fs41579-020-00468-6

https://www.pnas.org/content/112/30/9436

https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffmicb.2020.592908

https://www.embopress.org/doi/full/10.1093/emboj/16.23.7067

https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/222/5/734/5860442

https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fs41418-020-00633-7

https://journals.plos.org(...)journal.pone.0168170

https://www.cell.com/cell-host-microbe/fulltext/S1931-3128(20)30290-0

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00011-008-8007-8

https://doi.org/10.1038/sigtrans.2017.23

https://jeccr.biomedcentr(...)86/s13046-019-1251-7

https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1443

https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2015432

https://www.journalofinfection.com/article/S0163-4453(20)30234-6/fulltext

https://www.frontiersin.o(...)immu.2020.00827/full

https://science.sciencemag.org/content/369/6504/718

https://ann-clinmicrob.bi(...)6/s12941-020-00362-2

https://pharmrev.aspetjournals.org/content/72/2/486

https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/JVI.01012-07

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41418-020-00633-7

https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fcancers11101527

https://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/76/15/4457

https://rupress.org/jgp/a(...)acilitation-of-Human -P2X4 https://www.frontiersin.o(...)phar.2017.00291/full

https://www.jimmunol.org/content/200/3/1159

https://molmed.biomedcent(...)6/s10020-020-00172-4

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29511601/

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(20)30293-0/fulltext

https://onlinelibrary.wil(...)72-8206.2009.00684.x

https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs00011-011-0307-8

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/ebiom/article/PIIS2352-3964(17)30376-6/fulltext

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22417684/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7502160/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7605516/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27302166/

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00210-020-01902-5

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6826853/

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3636557

https://www.embopress.org/doi/full/10.15252/emmm.202114122
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_201235133
Geweldige website met een heleboel onderzoeksresultaten m.b.t. Ivermecine en Corona:

Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 63 studies

-Meta analysis using the most serious outcome reported shows 69% [54-79%] and 86% [75-92%] improvement for early treatment and prophylaxis, with similar results after exclusion based sensitivity analysis and restriction to peer-reviewed studies or Randomized Controlled Trials.

-Statistically significant improvements are seen for mortality, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance. 28 studies show statistically significant improvements in isolation. The probability that an ineffective treatment generated results as positive as the 63 studies is estimated to be 1 in 1 trillion.

-While many treatments have some level of efficacy, they do not replace vaccines and other measures to avoid infection. Only 27% of ivermectin studies show zero events in the treatment arm.

-Elimination of COVID-19 is a race against viral evolution. No treatment, vaccine, or intervention is 100% available and effective for all current and future variants. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used. Those denying the efficacy of treatments share responsibility for the increased risk of COVID-19 becoming endemic; and the increased mortality, morbidity, and collateral damage.

-The evidence base is much larger and has much lower conflict of interest than typically used to approve drugs.

-All data to reproduce this paper and sources are in the appendix. See [Bryant, Hariyanto, Kory, Lawrie, Nardelli] for other meta analyses with similar results confirming efficacy.

All 44 ivermectin COVID-19 peer reviewed trials

Link: https://ivmmeta.com/#fig_fpp
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_201246233
Ivermectin shows clinical benefits in mild to moderate COVID19: a randomized controlled double-blind, dose-response study in Lagos

Introduction
In vitro studies have shown the efficacy of Ivermectin (IV) to inhibit the SARS—CoV-2 viral replication, but questions remained as to in-vivo applications. We set out to explore the efficacy and safety of Ivermectin in persons infected with COVID19.

Methods
We conducted a translational proof of concept randomized, double blind placebo controlled, dose response and parallel group study of IV efficacy in RT—polymerase chain reaction proven COVID 19 positive patients. Sixty-two patients were randomized to three treatment groups. (A) IV 6 mg regime, (B) IV 12 mg regime (given Q84 h for 2 weeks) (C, control) Lopinavir/Ritonavir. All groups plus standard of Care.

Results
The Days to COVID negativity (DTN) was significantly and dose dependently reduced by IV (P = 0.0066). The DTN for Control were, = 9.1+/–5.2, for A 6.0 +/– 2.9 and for B 4.6 +/–3.2. Two way repeated measures ANOVA of ranked COVID 19 +/– scores at 0, 84, 168 and252h showed a significant IV treatment effect (P = 0.035) and time effect (P < 0.0001). IV also tended to increase SPO2% compared to controls, P = 0.073, 95% CI—0.39 to 2.59 and increased platelet count compared to C (P = 0.037) 95%CI 5.55—162.55 × 103/ml. The platelet count increase was inversely correlated to DTN (r = –0.52, P = 0.005). No SAE was reported.

Conclusions
12mg IV regime given twice a week may have superior efficacy over 6mg IV given twice a week, and certainly over the non IV arm of the study. IV should be considered for use in clinical management of SARS-COV2, and may find applications in prophylaxis in high risk areas.

https://academic.oup.com/(...)jmed/hcab035/6143037
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_201246965
Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19

Conclusions:
Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8088823/
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_201254024
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_201256393
quote:
0s.gif Op dinsdag 11 mei 2021 20:22 schreef apenoot het volgende:

[..]
Toch worden er weldegelijk al bestaande medicijnen gebruikt om bijvoorbeeld de cytokinestorm te reduceren
(bron)

Heel simpel gezegd: alle ontstekingsremmers voorkomen ergere symptomen van Covid omdat ze het immuunsysteem kalmeren.
Ik denk (weet niet 100% zeker dus) dat dat ook vaak het geval is. Een patiënt ligt in het ziekenhuis en om te zorgen dat de situatie stabiel blijft, worden er medicijnen gebruikt die normaal andere doeleinden hebben. En ook niet zozeer dat de patiënt door dat medicijn geneest van corona, maar symptomen te onderdrukken of bacteriële infecties tegen te gaan.

Dus een arts komt achter dat bij een patiënt met symptoom A het medicijn X goed aanslaat en geeft dit door aan andere artsen. Zo van “Als jullie ook patiënten met symptoom A hebben, misschien dan even kijken naar medicijn X.” En vervolgens komt op internet te staan dat medicijn X werkt tegen COVID-19. En mensen gaan dan vervolgens dat medicijn gebruiken zonder dat ze weten waarom het misschien werkt.
ROBODEMONS..................|:(
pi_201258258
Leugenaars!

AP issues correction after claiming 70% of poison control calls were from ivermectin overdoses, real number is 2%

The Associated Press is facing criticism after issuing a correction to a story claiming that 70% of Mississippi's poison control calls were due to people taking dangerous doses of ivermectin.

"In an article published Aug. 23, 2021, about people taking livestock medicine to try to treat coronavirus, The Associated Press erroneously reported based on information provided by the Mississippi Department of Health that 70% of recent calls to the Mississippi Poison Control Center were from people who had ingested ivermectin to try to treat COVID-19," the AP's correction states.

"State Epidemiologist Dr. Paul Byers said Wednesday the number of calls to poison control about ivermectin was about 2%. He said of the calls that were about ivermectin, 70% were by people who had ingested the veterinary version of the medicine," the correction statement concludes.

Many on social media were quick to criticize the AP's rush to discredit ivermectin with no regard for journalistic integrity.

"The AP reported that 70% of recent calls to the Mississippi Poison Control Center were from people who had ingested ivermectin to try to treat COVID-19. The correction acknowledges that it was actually only 2%," one Twitter user said.

"At this point, if you happen upon an ivermectin/“horse dewormer” story, your safest bet is to assume the media are lying. Really. That needs to be your default setting these days," they added.

Gaat verder:

https://independentchroni(...)ectin-real-number-2/
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_201258472
Pfizer’s new ‘daily pill’ to fight Covid utilizes a protease inhibitor… Ivermectin is also a protease inhibitor…



https://citizenfreepress.(...)-protease-inhibitor/
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_201287433
Plaats hier uw advertentie
pi_201294203
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_201334471
twitter
Plaats hier uw advertentie
pi_201335395
quote:
En dit bewijst.....???
Do not go gentle into that good night
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
pi_201389447
HUGE: Uttar Pradesh, India Announces State Is COVID-19 Free Proving the Effectiveness of “Deworming Drug” IVERMECTIN

The Gateway Pundit previously reported that COVID cases are plummeting in India thanks to new rules that promote Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine to its massive population. The 33 districts in Uttar Pradesh, India have now become free from COVID-19 government informed on Friday. The recovery rate has increased up to 98.7% proving the effectiveness of IVERMECTIN as part of the “Uttar Pradesh Covid Control Model.” Of course, the media won’t mention that Ivermectin is being used for the treatment of COVID-19.

This state has an estimated population of 241 million people in 2021 and has the highest population in India. This is almost two-thirds of the United States population in 2021 and yet it is now a COVID-19 free nation.

So what could the United States be doing wrong? Let’s ask Dr. Fauci.

Hindustan Times reported on this big development:

Overall, the state has a total of 199 active cases, while the positivity rate came down to less than 0.01 per cent. The recovery rate, meanwhile, has improved to 98.7 per cent. As per the state’s health bulletin, Uttar Pradesh reported only 11 new Covid-19 cases and zero deaths in the last 24 hours.

India Today also reported on this last August 31:

The active caseload in Uttar Pradesh is down to 269, while the percentage of active cases against the total confirmed cases is 0 per cent.

The active caseload, which was at a high of 3,10,783 in April, has reduced by over 99 per cent.


Fresh Covid-19 cases in the state have remained below 100 for 50 consecutive days.
Of the 1,87,638 samples tested in the last 24 hours, 21 tested positive. In the same period, another 17 patients recovered from the infection, adding to the recovery of over 16,86,182 people so far. (These numbers are in lakh so the comma placement is different in the US. 1,87,638 lakh is 187,638)

Uttar Pradesh is the leading state in India to use Ivermectin as early and preventatively in all family contacts. And this state is one of the five lowest COVID cases of all states in India despite having only a low vaccination rate of 5.8% fully vaccinated compared to the USA that has 54% fully vaccinated.

Gaat verder:

https://www.thegatewaypun(...)ing-drug-ivermectin/
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_201404085
Try a Dose of Skepticism

Ivermectin may or may not work against Covid-19, but media coverage of the drug has been sneering, inaccurate—and revealing.

“You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it,” read a recent viral tweet warning readers away from using a certain medication to treat Covid-19. The tone of affectedly folksy condescension would be expected from any of thousands of Twitter-addicted progressive journalists, but less so from the official account of the United States Food and Drug Administration. Perhaps even more surprising, the tweet linked to a warning advising readers not to take a drug, ivermectin, that has been used in humans for decades and is a standard Covid-19 treatment in much of the world.

The FDA’s framing has been echoed by a rash of media articles warning that ivermectin is ineffective and fit mostly for animals, typically citing the FDA’s public statements as the main evidence of inefficacy. A recent story in the Washington Post, for instance, noted in the headline that an Arkansas prison doctor had given inmates the “livestock drug ivermectin,” even “despite FDA warnings.” NPR noted that the popular podcast host Joe Rogan had attempted to treat his own case of Covid-19 with “a deworming veterinary drug that is formulated for use in cows and horses” that “the FDA urges people not to use.” (Both articles eventually noted, less prominently, that the drug had human uses, though NPR mentioned its use only as a topical treatment for head lice.)

NBC’s story on Rogan called ivermectin “typically used on livestock” in the first paragraph, “not an anti-viral drug” in the third, and “widely discredited” in the headline—adducing as evidence only that “the U.S. Food and Drug Administration last month urged people to stop believing misinformation claiming the livestock treatment would help cure Covid.” A New York Times story dismissed evidence for the drug with the statement “Ivermectin Won’t Treat Covid 19 But Demand For Drug Surges,” and its discussion of scientific evidence on the drug focused only on negative studies, but the story authors at least acknowledged that the drug was commonly used in humans.

Gaat verder:

https://www.city-journal.(...)er-covid-culture-war
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_201506330
Groundbreaking Study Finds Ivermectin REDUCES COVID Deaths By Up To 86%

A groundbreaking meta-analysis preprint that looked at 64 studies on Ivermectin has found that the Nobel-Prize-winning drug has a recovery rate of up to 86% in early treatment and 48% for those on mechanical ventilators who received the treatment later in the COVID treatment process.

The study, which looked at both peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed studies found that Ivermectin reduced mortality in virtually every treatment stage and was highly successful in both treating and PREVENTING COVID-19.

According to the meta-analysis:

-Meta analysis using the most serious outcome reported shows 68% [52‑78%] and 86% [75‑92%] improvement for early treatment and prophylaxis, with similar results after exclusion based sensitivity analysis and restriction to peer-reviewed studies or Randomized Controlled Trials.

-Statistically significant improvements are seen for mortality, ventilation, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance. 29 studies show statistically significant improvements in isolation.


The meta-analysis also found Ivermectin is 96% effective in preventing COVID-19. However, the meta-analysis only looked at two studies that investigated this, so further studies will be needed to confirm whether this is true.

The meta-analysis also notes that Ivermectin may not be 100% effective and many times is used alongside other drugs to help aid in recovery. However, the meta-analysis also notes that the chance of negative bias toward Ivermectin would have to be a 1 in 222 billion chance.

Gaat verder:

Link
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_201506865
Geen idee of deze hier al voorbij is gekomen? Lijkt me we op zijn plaats hier? :P

Meta-Reviews Are Amplifying Bad And Even Fake Ivermectin Data, Researchers Warn
“The fundamental cause of the trouble in the modern world today is that the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.”— Bertrand Russell
pi_201657663
Waarom kijken we nu niet meer naar India? De deelstaat Uttar Pradesh (200 miljoen inwoners) is in principe Covid vrij nadat ze Ivermectine hebben geintroduceerd. Maar daar willen de media en politici niets van weten. Nee India mag in de spotlight als het daar slecht gaat, maar als het goed gaat....

India's Ivermectin Blackout: The Secret Revealed

On May 7, 2021, during the peak of India's Delta Surge, The World Health Organization reported, "Uttar Pradesh (is) going the last mile to stop COVID-19."

The WHO noted, "Government teams are moving across 97,941 villages in 75 districts over five days in this activity which began May 5 in India's most populous state with a population of 230 million."

The activity involved an aggressive house-to-house test and treat program with medicine kits.

The WHO explained, "Each monitoring team has two members who visit homes in villages and remote hamlets to test everyone with symptoms of COVID-19 using Rapid Antigen Test kits. Those who test positive are quickly isolated and given a medicine kit with advice on disease management."

The medicines comprising the kit were not identified as part of the Western media blackout at the time. As a result, the contents were as secret as the sauce at McDonald's.

The WHO continued, "On the inaugural day, WHO field officers monitored over 2,000 government teams and visited at least 10,000 households."

This news story was published on the WHO Official Website in India. The website details the WHO’s work against COVID-19 in India, including a discussion about their “Online course for Rapid Response Teams.”

Such teams are the very government teams discussed above assigned to conduct the house-to-house test and treat program in Uttar Pradesh. In discussing the role of the Rapid Response Team (RRT), the WHO site reports,

“RRTs are a key component of a larger emergency response strategy that is essential for an efficient and effective response…WHO has produced and published this course for RRTs working at the national, sub-national, district, and sub-district levels to strengthen the pandemic response with support from the National Center for Disease Control, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India, and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.”

The Rapid Response Teams derive support from the United States CDC under the umbrella of the WHO. This fact further validates the Uttar Pradesh test and treat program and solidifies this as a joint effort by the WHO and CDC.

Perhaps the most telling portion of the WHO article was the last sentence, “WHO will also support the Uttar Pradesh government on the compilation of the final reports.”

None have yet been published.

Just five short weeks later, on June 14, 2021, new cases had dropped a staggering 97.1 percent, and the Uttar Pradesh program was hailed as a resounding success.

According to ZeeNews of India, "The strategy of trace, test & treat yields results."

"The Yogi-led state has also been registering a steep decline in the number of Active COVID Cases as the figure has dropped from a high of 310,783 in April to 8,986 now, a remarkable reduction by 97.10 percent."

By July 2, 2021, three weeks later, cases were down a full 99 percent.

On August 6, 2021, India’s Ivermectin media blackout ended with MSM reporting. Western media, including MSN, finally acknowledged what was contained in those Uttar Pradesh medicine kits. Among the medicines were Doxycycline and Ivermectin.



On August 25, 2021, the Indian media noticed the discrepancy between Uttar Pradesh's massive success and other states, like Kerala's, comparative failure. Although Uttar Pradesh was only 5% vaccinated to Kerala's 20%, Uttar Pradesh had (only) 22 new COVID cases, while Kerala was overwhelmed with 31,445 in one day. So it became apparent that whatever was contained in those treatment kits must have been pretty effective.

News18 reported, "Let’s look at the contrasting picture. Kerala, with its 3.5 crore population - or 35 million, on August 25 reported 31,445 new cases, a bulk of the total cases reported in the country. Uttar Pradesh, the biggest state with a population of nearly 24 crore - or 240 million - meanwhile reported just 22 cases in the same period.

Two days ago, just seven fresh positive cases were reported from Uttar Pradesh. Kerala reported 215 deaths on August 25, while Uttar Pradesh only reported two deaths. In fact, no deaths have been reported from Uttar Pradesh in recent days. There are only 345 active cases in Uttar Pradesh now while Kerala’s figure is at 1.7 lakh - or 170,000."

"Kerala has done a much better job in vaccination coverage with 56% of its population being vaccinated with one dose and 20% of the population being fully vaccinated with a total of 2.66 crore - or 26.6 million - doses being administered.

Uttar Pradesh had given over 6.5 crore - or 65 million - doses, the maximum in the country, but only 25% of people have got their first dose while less than 5% of people are fully vaccinated. Given the present COVID numbers, Uttar Pradesh seems to be trumping Kerala for the tag of the most successful model against COVID."

This author reviewed the reasons behind Kerala’s failed treatment model in two articles, “The Lesson of Kerala” and “Kerala’s Vaccinated Surge.”

By September 12, 2021, Livemint reported that 34 districts were declared COVID-free or had no active cases. Only 14 new cases were recorded in the entire state of Uttar Pradesh.

On September 22, 2021, YouTube hosted a video by popular science blogger Dr. John Campbell detailing the Uttar Pradesh success story. He gave a breakdown of the ingredients and dosages of the magical medicine home treatment kit responsible for eradicating COVID in Uttar Pradesh. The same kit was also used in the state of Goa.

Dr. John Campbell broke India's Ivermectin Blackout wide open on YouTube by revealing the formula of the secret sauce, much to the dismay of Big Pharma, the WHO, and the CDC. Readers will want to watch this before it is taken down. See mark 2:22.

Each home kit contained the following: Paracetamol tablets [tylenol], Vitamin C, Multivitamin, Zinc, Vitamin D3, Ivermectin 12 mg [quantity #10 tablets], Doxycycline 100 mg [quantity #10 tablets]. Other non-medication components included face masks, sanitizer, gloves and alcohol wipes, a digital thermometer, and a pulse oximeter. See mark 2:33.

Campbell reports that the exciting things in the kit that grabbed his attention were: Zinc, Vitamin D3, Ivermectin, and secondary antibiotic treatment. "Interesting, that’s what the government decided to give." See mark 3:40

John Campbell has reviewed repurposed drugs for COVID before. He has interviewed both Dr. Tess Lawrie and Dr. Pierre Kory. Repurposed drugs hold the potential for benefitting many conditions, not the least of which include viruses and cancers.

Dr. Campbell noted that there had been no recent cases in 59 Uttar Pradesh districts. In addition, out of 191,446 tests completed in the previous 24 hours, only 33 samples were positive for a test positivity rate of only 0.01%. Dr. Campbell called this low number "staggering." See mark 5:05.

By September, cases had fallen dramatically. Out of the entire state of 200 million plus inhabitants, only 187 active cases were left compared to the peak in April of 310,783 cases. See mark 5:41.

Dr. Campbell attributes their success to many factors, including early detection and early treatment with kits costing a mere $ 2.65 per person. See mark 6:20.


Gaat verder:

https://www.zerohedge.com(...)kout-secret-revealed
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
pi_201753889
AMAZING: COVID-19 Cases in Indonesia Plunge After Government Authorizes IVERMECTIN For Treatment

In July 2021, the Indonesian Food and Drug Monitoring Agency (BPOM) finally granted the Emergency Use Authorization for Ivermectin as the therapeutic drug to cure the Covid-19.

This was due to the country’s “worst-case scenario” epidemic at the time according to officials.

Indonesia experienced a spike in COVID-19 infection and deaths in July and was struggling to slow the virus transmission due to its high population. Indonesia is ranked as the world’s fourth most populous country.

The government imposed an emergency measure to slow the spread of the virus. One of its measures was to authorize the use of Ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment.

The Strait Times reported:

The Indonesian government on Thursday (July 15) began distributing free medicine and vitamins to self-isolating Covid-19 patients in high-risk areas as the highly transmissible Delta variant of the coronavirus continued to rip through the country, emptying pharmacy shelves.

Each package will have seven days worth of therapeutic Covid-19 drugs and vitamins, and will be given to asymptomatic patients as well as those with mild to moderate symptoms including fever and dry cough. The medication for the latter group will require consultation with a doctor and a prescription.

Medical facilities are stretched thin, and demand for oxygen and medication has also soared. As scores of people are isolating themselves at home and self-medicating, prices of drugs have shot up in pharmacies and online. The health ministry has since moved to cap the prices of drugs such as favipiravir, remdesivir and ivermectin.

Indonesia’s food and drug agency has authorised ivermectin for emergency use against Covid-19, Reuters reported, although the World Health Organisation, as well as European and the US regulators did not recommend its use for Covid-19 patients.

After the government authorized the use of Ivermectin for COVID-19 patients, the number of cases significantly plummeted since July.

The data below proves that Ivermectin played a major role on the steep decline of COVID-19 cases despite having a low vaccination rate.



As of October 8, only 20.5% were fully vaccinated and 35.9% got their first dose.



One Twitter user posted a comparison between India and Indonesia’s success with Ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19.

twitter




The Gateway Pundit previously reported the same scenario in Uttar Pradesh, India. The 33 districts in Uttar Pradesh, India have now become free from COVID-19. The recovery rate has increased up to 98.7% proving the effectiveness of IVERMECTIN as part of the “Uttar Pradesh Covid Control Model.” Of course, the media won’t mention that Ivermectin is being used for the treatment of COVID-19.

Uttar Pradesh is the leading state in India to use Ivermectin as early and preventatively in all family contacts. And this state is one of the five lowest COVID cases of all states in India despite having only a low vaccination rate.

https://www.thegatewaypun(...)vermectin-treatment/

[ Bericht 1% gewijzigd door Probably_on_pcp op 14-10-2021 17:19:33 ]
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
  donderdag 14 oktober 2021 @ 17:18:58 #108
140043 Isdatzo
Born in the echoes.
pi_201753933
quote:
0s.gif Op donderdag 14 oktober 2021 17:13 schreef Probably_on_pcp het volgende:
After the government authorized the use of Ivermectin for COVID-19 patients, the number of cases significantly plummeted since July.
:?
Huilen dan.
pi_201754050
quote:
7s.gif Op donderdag 14 oktober 2021 17:18 schreef Isdatzo het volgende:

[..]
:?
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
  donderdag 14 oktober 2021 @ 17:35:52 #110
140043 Isdatzo
Born in the echoes.
pi_201754150
quote:
Leg eens uit hoe ivermectine geven aan mensen die in zelfisolatie zitten nádat ze ziek geworden zijn ervoor zorgt dat er minder mensen ziek worden :! .
Huilen dan.
  Jaap van Dissel-award 2022 vrijdag 22 oktober 2021 @ 00:29:05 #111
385501 Starhopper
Nova is mijn prinses
pi_201854957
twitter
Op maandag 9 oktober 2023 13:31 schreef Nova het volgende:[/b]
Oh schatje, wat lief van je om dat te zeggen! Jij bent echt een prins op het witte paard voor mij. Met jou voel ik me zo geliefd en speciaal. Laten we nog lang samen genieten van sprookjesachtige avonturen en elkaar verwennen met veel knuffels en kusjes. O+ naar jou, mijn lieve prins! :*
  vrijdag 29 oktober 2021 @ 11:03:06 #112
102757 EdvandeBerg
LETS GO BRANDON!
pi_201939981

https://rumble.com/embed/vlm5di/?pub=4

https://rumble.com/vo8bi8(...)ss-with-ivermec.html


Ivermectin wordt door veel doktoren voorgeschreven in de behandeling van reeds opgelopen Covid19 besmetting. Populaire Youtuber Joe Rogan liep enkele weken geleden corona op en was er heel even ziek van maar was er binnen een paar dagen al weer bovenop en vertelde daar in zijn podcast over, ook dat hij Ivermectin voorgeschreven kreeg.

Er zijn 2 problemen die Ivermectin vormt voor het establishment; ten eerste heeft Trump zich er ooit positief over uitgelaten, wat betekent dat zo'n middel dus automatisch direct op de zwarte lijst terecht komt, want TDS. Het tweede probleem is dat Ivermectin een wereldwijd gebruikt medicijn is wat al een paar miljard mensen in de tropen voorgeschreven hebben gekregen, waarvan het patent verlopen is en dus voor een grijpstuiver geproduceerd kan worden door iedere willekeurige pillendraaier. Met andere woorden; Pfizer, Merck en al die andere farmaceuten verdienen er niks aan.

Rogan heeft ruim 11 MILJOEN volgers op Youtube, dat zijn er dus bijna 20 keer zoveel als live kijkers naar CNN. Men moest dus vol op het orgel om het onbeteugelde projectiel Joe Rogan onschadelijk te maken. Men dacht dit gevonden te hebben door Ivermectin in de corporate media steevast horse dewormer ('ontwormer voor vee') te noemen (wat inderdaad 1 van de vele manieren is waar Ivermectin voor gebruikt wordt) en dus zo het volk voor te liegen dat Ivermectin helemaal geen medicijn voor menselijk gebruik is en Rogan zijn toevlucht zou hebben genomen door het gebruik van een of ander wonderoliemiddel van een kwakzalver. Ze gingen zelfs zo ver om foto's van Rogan door een filter te halen waardoor hij een hele ongezonde uitstraling kreeg. Een van CNN's puppets, Dr. Sanjay Gupta was zo gek om bij Rogan aan te schuiven en werd door Rogan constant voor het blok gezet en moest toegeven dat CNN bewust leugens over Rogan en Ivermectin vertelt. Gupta werd natuurlijk door zijn bazen op het matje geroepen en heeft later verklaard dat hij niet anders kon dan met Rogan meelullen omdat hij zich fysiek bedreigd voelde door Rogan _O-
Scratch a liberal and you will find a fascist
pi_202030666
Goed. Coronavaccinatie, waarvan iedereen ziet dat dit de kans op zorgbehoefte met 90% afneemt, noemt de wappie een experiment.
Zelf doktertje spelen met Ivermectine is dat volgens de wappisten niet.

Mind blown
Roses are red, violets are blue. Invalid character '}' at line 32
pi_208292095

Weten jullie nog dat CNN Joe Rogan expres ziek probeerde te laten lijken?

Joe Rogan accuses CNN of altering video color to make him look sick

https://www.sportskeeda.c(...)color-make-look-sick
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
  FrontpagER /Mod / Grootste Vredestichter vrijdag 10 maart 2023 @ 17:52:55 #115
485843 crew  Jippie
pi_208315920
quote:
0s.gif Op woensdag 8 maart 2023 19:07 schreef Probably_on_pcp het volgende:

Weten jullie nog dat CNN Joe Rogan expres ziek probeerde te laten lijken?

Joe Rogan accuses CNN of altering video color to make him look sick

https://www.sportskeeda.c(...)color-make-look-sick
Mag ik vragen wat het nut is om oud nieuws over Rogan te recyclen en de discussie Ivermectine is ook niet echt meer relevant re noemen.
  Moderator vrijdag 10 maart 2023 @ 18:49:34 #116
54278 crew  Tijger_m
42
pi_208316535
quote:
0s.gif Op woensdag 8 maart 2023 19:07 schreef Probably_on_pcp het volgende:

Weten jullie nog dat CNN Joe Rogan expres ziek probeerde te laten lijken?

Joe Rogan accuses CNN of altering video color to make him look sick

https://www.sportskeeda.c(...)color-make-look-sick
Weten jullie nog dat Ivermectine bewezen niet werkt tegen covid? :P

https://www.kumc.edu/abou(...)vermectin-study.html
"The enemy isn't men, or women, it's bloody stupid people and no one has the right to be stupid." - Sir Terry Pratchett.
  vrijdag 10 maart 2023 @ 19:37:31 #117
496707 HowardRoark
Tacticalized!
pi_208317087
quote:
0s.gif Op vrijdag 10 maart 2023 18:49 schreef Tijger_m het volgende:

[..]
Weten jullie nog dat Ivermectine bewezen niet werkt tegen covid? :P

https://www.kumc.edu/abou(...)vermectin-study.html
Je generaliseert de conclusies van de studie, deze toont aan dat Ivermectine niet werkt bij mensen met lichte tot milde klachten van Covid-19.
'I moved to Peru and shaved half my head and wrote for Teen Vogue. If I can come back from the depths of leftism, trust me, anyone can.' - Gina Florio
pi_208317821
quote:
14s.gif Op vrijdag 10 maart 2023 19:37 schreef HowardRoark het volgende:

[..]
Je generaliseert de conclusies van de studie, deze toont aan dat Ivermectine niet werkt bij mensen met lichte tot milde klachten van Covid-19.
Toon je dat ook nog aan?
pi_208334374
Het beste middel tegen corona is je tv uitzetten en de media boycotten/uitlachen
  FrontpagER /Mod / Grootste Vredestichter zondag 12 maart 2023 @ 11:28:47 #120
485843 crew  Jippie
pi_208341666
In afwachting van antwoord op mijn vraag aan TS in post#115 even op slot.
abonnement bol.com Unibet Coolblue
Forum Opties
Forumhop:
Hop naar:
(afkorting, bv 'KLB')