BNW Brave New World
Samenzwering, verborgen agenda's en geheime geschiedenis. De zoektocht naar de wereld die achter de façade van alledag ligt.
In wat voor vakgebied werk jij?quote:Op dinsdag 9 maart 2021 19:15 schreef Probably_on_pcp het volgende:
Bespottelijk.
Je moet je echt je ogen uit je kop schamen.
Je zou op z'n minst moeten zeggen dat je de waarheid in het midden laat, maar nee hoor een mod die bepaald welke bron leidend is en wat de waarheid is.
Wordt het niet eens tijd voor een baan jongen?quote:
[..]
Bespottelijk.
Je moet je echt je ogen uit je kop schamen.
Je zou op z'n minst moeten zeggen dat je de waarheid in het midden laat, maar nee hoor een mod die bepaald welke bron leidend is en wat de waarheid is.
Op maandag 1 oktober 2012 18:45 schreef Chocolatebear het volgende:
Zei de man, terwijl hij een shaggie opstak en het gas open trok van zijn Tomos.
Zei de man, terwijl hij een shaggie opstak en het gas open trok van zijn Tomos.
Kom anders eens met betrouwbare bronnen. Verder moet je eens goed in de spiegel kojken als je het verschil niet meer ziet tussen BNW en realiteit.quote:
[..]
Bespottelijk.
Je moet je echt je ogen uit je kop schamen.
Je zou op z'n minst moeten zeggen dat je de waarheid in het midden laat, maar nee hoor een mod die bepaald welke bron leidend is en wat de waarheid is.
Het antwoord op de belangrijkste vraag van alle vragen? 42!
Studie naar Ivermectin met zeer positieve resultaten. Nog niet gepeer-reviewed:
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
Men is er nog helemaal niet definitief over uit, maarquote:Op dinsdag 9 maart 2021 18:30 schreef Tijger_m het volgende:
Gezien het feit dat het medicijn in kwestie totaal niet werkzaam blijkt te zijn in de echte wereld gaat dit topic naar BNW
https://www.medischcontac(...)et-tegen-corona-.htm
(bron)quote:Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified.
Het moge inmiddels duidelijk zijn dat geen enkel middel, hoe effectief ook, werkzaam MAG zijn van de vaccin-pushers.
Haha, U schakelt nog. Test een DAF !
Toch worden er weldegelijk al bestaande medicijnen gebruikt om bijvoorbeeld de cytokinestorm te reducerenquote:
Het moge inmiddels duidelijk zijn dat geen enkel middel, hoe effectief ook, werkzaam MAG zijn van de vaccin-pushers.
(bron)
Heel simpel gezegd: alle ontstekingsremmers voorkomen ergere symptomen van Covid omdat ze het immuunsysteem kalmeren.
Ik heb een bekende Amerikaanse zakenman/politicus horen zeggen dat bleekmiddel zeer effectief is om corona te bestrijden!quote:
Het moge inmiddels duidelijk zijn dat geen enkel middel, hoe effectief ook, werkzaam MAG zijn van de vaccin-pushers.
Er staat nog een vraag voor u open!!
Wat een onzin weer.quote:
Het moge inmiddels duidelijk zijn dat geen enkel middel, hoe effectief ook, werkzaam MAG zijn van de vaccin-pushers.
Huilen dan.
Dat het gros van mensen zich graag eenzijdig door bigpharma met belangen laten informeren is een studie waard op zich. En het zijn vaak mensen die hebben gestudeerd 🤔
Een anti chloroquine artikel werd toch weer verwijderd uit een wetenschappelijk tijdschrift vanwege leugens?quote:
Dat maakt HCQ niet ineens wél effectief. Hoeveel solide onderzoeken staan daartegenover? En een uitstekend voorbeeld van het zelfreinigend vermogen van de medische wetenschap, niet?quote:
[..]
Een anti chloroquine artikel werd toch weer verwijderd uit een wetenschappelijk tijdschrift vanwege leugens?
Huilen dan.
Als HCQ niet werkt en daar zoveel bewijs voor is. Waarvoor was die lastercampagne in een wetenschappelijk tijdschrift (die weer werd weggehaald) tegen HCQ dan goed voor?quote:Op woensdag 12 mei 2021 15:02 schreef Isdatzo het volgende:
[..]
Dat maakt HCQ niet ineens wél effectief. Hoeveel solide onderzoeken staan daartegenover? En een uitstekend voorbeeld van het zelfreinigend vermogen van de medische wetenschap, niet?
Nergens goed voor. Prachtige redenatie dit.quote:Op woensdag 12 mei 2021 15:09 schreef TFL het volgende:
[..]
Als HCQ niet werkt en daar zoveel bewijs voor is. Waarvoor was die lastercampagne in een wetenschappelijk tijdschrift (die weer werd weggehaald) tegen HCQ dan goed voor?
Huilen dan.
Iedereen met een beetje verstand weet dat juist big pharma goedkoop is, ten opzichte van bijna alle alternatieve dingen. Zoals homeopathie en dergelijke..quote:
Dat het gros van mensen zich graag eenzijdig door bigpharma met belangen laten informeren is een studie waard op zich. En het zijn vaak mensen die hebben gestudeerd 🤔
dus juist die alternatieve producenten hebben belangen, big pharma veel minder. Zij willen gewoon producten op de markt wat wetenschappelijk werkt.
Een vaccin bijvoorbeeld werkt, en je het maar 1 keer of misschien 2 keer te gebruiken. Medicijnen daarentegen moet je je leven gebruiken en kost dus meer. Big Pharma zou dan juist tegen vaccinatie moeten zijn.
Dan heb je slecht geluisterd, ofwel is jouw kennis van de Engelse taal een beetje aan de lage kant.quote:
[..]
Ik heb een bekende Amerikaanse zakenman/politicus horen zeggen dat bleekmiddel zeer effectief is om corona te bestrijden!
Er werd gesproken over een desinfecterend middel, niet over bleekmiddel.
Haha, U schakelt nog. Test een DAF !
Mensen wier realiteit enkel bestaat uit dat wat door een select groepje geautoriseerde instituten en personen wordt gezegd, zijn niet te overtuigen. Dat moet je ook niet willen proberen, ze denken niet als kritische mensen. Het enige dat hen kan ontwaken is een immens schokkende ervaring. Maar dan moeten ze natuurlijk wel in staat zijn oorzaak en gevolg te linken.
quote:Op zondag 16 mei 2021 16:00 schreef QuidProJoe het volgende:
Mensen wier realiteit enkel bestaat uit dat wat door een select groepje geautoriseerde instituten en personen wordt gezegd, zijn niet te overtuigen. Dat moet je ook niet willen proberen, ze denken niet als kritische mensen. Het enige dat hen kan ontwaken is een immens schokkende ervaring. Maar dan moeten ze natuurlijk wel in staat zijn oorzaak en gevolg te linken.
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19
Abstract
Background:
After COVID-19 emerged on U.S shores, providers began reviewing the emerging basic science, translational, and clinical data to identify potentially effective treatment options. In addition, a multitude of both novel and repurposed therapeutic agents were used empirically and studied within clinical trials.
Areas of Uncertainty:
The majority of trialed agents have failed to provide reproducible, definitive proof of efficacy in reducing the mortality of COVID-19 with the exception of corticosteroids in moderate to severe disease. Recently, evidence has emerged that the oral antiparasitic agent ivermectin exhibits numerous antiviral and anti-inflammatory mechanisms with trial results reporting significant outcome benefits. Given some have not passed peer review, several expert groups including Unitaid/World Health Organization have undertaken a systematic global effort to contact all active trial investigators to rapidly gather the data needed to grade and perform meta-analyses.
Data Sources:
Data were sourced from published peer-reviewed studies, manuscripts posted to preprint servers, expert meta-analyses, and numerous epidemiological analyses of regions with ivermectin distribution campaigns.
Therapeutic Advances:
A large majority of randomized and observational controlled trials of ivermectin are reporting repeated, large magnitude improvements in clinical outcomes. Numerous prophylaxis trials demonstrate that regular ivermectin use leads to large reductions in transmission. Multiple, large “natural experiments” occurred in regions that initiated “ivermectin distribution” campaigns followed by tight, reproducible, temporally associated decreases in case counts and case fatality rates compared with nearby regions without such campaigns.
Conclusions:
Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified.
https://journals.lww.com/(...)nstrating_the.4.aspx
Abstract
Background:
After COVID-19 emerged on U.S shores, providers began reviewing the emerging basic science, translational, and clinical data to identify potentially effective treatment options. In addition, a multitude of both novel and repurposed therapeutic agents were used empirically and studied within clinical trials.
Areas of Uncertainty:
The majority of trialed agents have failed to provide reproducible, definitive proof of efficacy in reducing the mortality of COVID-19 with the exception of corticosteroids in moderate to severe disease. Recently, evidence has emerged that the oral antiparasitic agent ivermectin exhibits numerous antiviral and anti-inflammatory mechanisms with trial results reporting significant outcome benefits. Given some have not passed peer review, several expert groups including Unitaid/World Health Organization have undertaken a systematic global effort to contact all active trial investigators to rapidly gather the data needed to grade and perform meta-analyses.
Data Sources:
Data were sourced from published peer-reviewed studies, manuscripts posted to preprint servers, expert meta-analyses, and numerous epidemiological analyses of regions with ivermectin distribution campaigns.
Therapeutic Advances:
A large majority of randomized and observational controlled trials of ivermectin are reporting repeated, large magnitude improvements in clinical outcomes. Numerous prophylaxis trials demonstrate that regular ivermectin use leads to large reductions in transmission. Multiple, large “natural experiments” occurred in regions that initiated “ivermectin distribution” campaigns followed by tight, reproducible, temporally associated decreases in case counts and case fatality rates compared with nearby regions without such campaigns.
Conclusions:
Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified.
https://journals.lww.com/(...)nstrating_the.4.aspx
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
COVID-19: Disease Hitting a Brick Wall in Mexico City
What will you do if you get COVID while waiting in line for the vaccine, or even after?
If you are in Mexico City, you will be treated with ivermectin. As of Dec 29, this long-established drug has been used in COVID-positive patients, and soon thereafter death rates started to plummet, as the graphic shows. By Jan 22, about 50,000 doses had been delivered.
Mexico City is following the example of the state of Chiapas, which saw cases drop by two-thirds after it started using ivermectin on Aug 1, as Dr. Pierre Kory told the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs on Dec 8.
It is too soon to see whether vaccinations decrease the rate of COVID hospitalizations or deaths. In the U.S., these are still rising, and the official policy on early treatment is still therapeutic nihilism. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) did update its long-standing recommendation against ivermectin to “neutral.” It considers the evidence from 39 trials, all favorable, to be insufficient.
We are already seeing adverse side effects from the vaccine. Some 151 deaths shortly following (but not necessarily caused by) the vaccine have been reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS). A nurse who cares for nursing home residents describes deterioration in his patients’ mobility and cognition after their second dose.
Between Dec 14 and Dec 18, about 272,001 doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine were administered and 3,150 “Health Impact Events” were recorded (1.1%). The CDC’s definition of Health Impact Events is “unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work, required care from doctor or health care professional.” It is not known how serious or long-lasting the events were. When people receive the vaccine, they will receive information on signing up for the V-safe program.
It is not known whether the vaccine would prevent or ameliorate the disease if taken after exposure. It is also not known whether vaccinated persons can transmit disease, according to the Robert Koch Institute. Vaccinated persons can be treated if they get COVID.
Head-to-head comparisons between long-term results of early treatment versus vaccination are not being done.
For some vulnerable populations, such as prison inmates, it is too late for vaccination. In one Arizona prison, more than half the inmates tested positive for COVID-19 in early December. AAPS has a asked Arizona governor Doug Ducey to facilitate making ivermectin available in prisons and other high-risk settings.
https://aapsonline.org/co(...)wall-in-mexico-city/
What will you do if you get COVID while waiting in line for the vaccine, or even after?
If you are in Mexico City, you will be treated with ivermectin. As of Dec 29, this long-established drug has been used in COVID-positive patients, and soon thereafter death rates started to plummet, as the graphic shows. By Jan 22, about 50,000 doses had been delivered.
Mexico City is following the example of the state of Chiapas, which saw cases drop by two-thirds after it started using ivermectin on Aug 1, as Dr. Pierre Kory told the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs on Dec 8.
It is too soon to see whether vaccinations decrease the rate of COVID hospitalizations or deaths. In the U.S., these are still rising, and the official policy on early treatment is still therapeutic nihilism. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) did update its long-standing recommendation against ivermectin to “neutral.” It considers the evidence from 39 trials, all favorable, to be insufficient.
We are already seeing adverse side effects from the vaccine. Some 151 deaths shortly following (but not necessarily caused by) the vaccine have been reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS). A nurse who cares for nursing home residents describes deterioration in his patients’ mobility and cognition after their second dose.
Between Dec 14 and Dec 18, about 272,001 doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine were administered and 3,150 “Health Impact Events” were recorded (1.1%). The CDC’s definition of Health Impact Events is “unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work, required care from doctor or health care professional.” It is not known how serious or long-lasting the events were. When people receive the vaccine, they will receive information on signing up for the V-safe program.
It is not known whether the vaccine would prevent or ameliorate the disease if taken after exposure. It is also not known whether vaccinated persons can transmit disease, according to the Robert Koch Institute. Vaccinated persons can be treated if they get COVID.
Head-to-head comparisons between long-term results of early treatment versus vaccination are not being done.
For some vulnerable populations, such as prison inmates, it is too late for vaccination. In one Arizona prison, more than half the inmates tested positive for COVID-19 in early December. AAPS has a asked Arizona governor Doug Ducey to facilitate making ivermectin available in prisons and other high-risk settings.
https://aapsonline.org/co(...)wall-in-mexico-city/
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
Ivermectin: Controversial COVID-19 Drug Used in Mexico City
Yesterday, Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador announced on Twitter he tested positive for COVID-19. He added that he is doing well and today, he called Russian President Vladimir Putin to discuss the delivery of 24 million doses of the Sputnik V vaccine.
Meanwhile, Oliva López, Head of the Mexico City Ministry of Health, reported that the city’s medical staff was administering ivermectin and azithromycin to COVID-19 patients, reported el Financiero, with the support of the National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition “Salvador Zubirán” (INCMNSZ), the Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS) and the Ministry of Education, Science, Technology and Innovation (SECTEI). “The Ministry of Health has determined there is enough evidence to use medicines such as ivermectin and azithromycin on SARS-CoV-2 positive people, even those without symptoms,” said López. In Mexico City, 50,747 people have been administered one of those medicines, among others, as part of their COVID-19 treatment, López told Forbes Mexico. However, she urged citizens to avoid self-medicating when it came to these treatments and urged anyone presenting symptoms to get medical attention.
Last April, researchers from Monash University in Melbourne, Australia, discovered that ivermectin could be used to treat SARS-CoV-2, reported Forbes Mexico. But both the FDA and WHO advise against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 and warn of side effects, reports Deutsche Welle. Previously, ivermectin tablets had been approved for the treatment of some parasitic worms, while topical formulations were approved for the treatment of external parasites such as headlice and skin conditions such as rosacea, according to the FDA. But more evidence is necessary regarding its effectiveness and safety in the treatment of COVID-19, warn researchers.
Last month, the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAPHRA) said that the drug had not been approved for human use as there is no sound clinical evidence supporting its use in fighting COVID-19, reports iAfrica. The Regulatory Authority argued that the clinical trials needed to justify its administration are still lacking. However, some countries in Latin America including Peru, Bolivia and Guatemala have been administering ivermectin to COVID-19 patients.
https://mexicobusiness.ne(...)rug-used-mexico-city
Yesterday, Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador announced on Twitter he tested positive for COVID-19. He added that he is doing well and today, he called Russian President Vladimir Putin to discuss the delivery of 24 million doses of the Sputnik V vaccine.
Meanwhile, Oliva López, Head of the Mexico City Ministry of Health, reported that the city’s medical staff was administering ivermectin and azithromycin to COVID-19 patients, reported el Financiero, with the support of the National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition “Salvador Zubirán” (INCMNSZ), the Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS) and the Ministry of Education, Science, Technology and Innovation (SECTEI). “The Ministry of Health has determined there is enough evidence to use medicines such as ivermectin and azithromycin on SARS-CoV-2 positive people, even those without symptoms,” said López. In Mexico City, 50,747 people have been administered one of those medicines, among others, as part of their COVID-19 treatment, López told Forbes Mexico. However, she urged citizens to avoid self-medicating when it came to these treatments and urged anyone presenting symptoms to get medical attention.
Last April, researchers from Monash University in Melbourne, Australia, discovered that ivermectin could be used to treat SARS-CoV-2, reported Forbes Mexico. But both the FDA and WHO advise against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 and warn of side effects, reports Deutsche Welle. Previously, ivermectin tablets had been approved for the treatment of some parasitic worms, while topical formulations were approved for the treatment of external parasites such as headlice and skin conditions such as rosacea, according to the FDA. But more evidence is necessary regarding its effectiveness and safety in the treatment of COVID-19, warn researchers.
Last month, the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAPHRA) said that the drug had not been approved for human use as there is no sound clinical evidence supporting its use in fighting COVID-19, reports iAfrica. The Regulatory Authority argued that the clinical trials needed to justify its administration are still lacking. However, some countries in Latin America including Peru, Bolivia and Guatemala have been administering ivermectin to COVID-19 patients.
https://mexicobusiness.ne(...)rug-used-mexico-city
"An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."
