BNW Brave New World
Samenzwering, verborgen agenda's en geheime geschiedenis. De zoektocht naar de wereld die achter de façade van alledag ligt.
Yes - they all seem to piss in the same pot indeed.quote:Op maandag 24 december 2018 18:46 schreef theguyver het volgende:
[..]
En de rest doet hun gewoon na? Rusland Frankrijk noord korea India Pakistan etc? Bedoel die laatste 2 liggen sinds afscheiding van gb met elkaar overhoop he..
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
'But why?' what? Try and be more clear with your questions (and answers) please.quote:Op maandag 24 december 2018 18:46 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:
[..]
But why? Fearmongery doesn't make something fake.
https://issuepedia.org/Fearmongery
Fearmongery is a manipulative tool which is used by powermongers to gain political power by the following methodology:
1. invent an existential threat
2. convince gullible people that it threatens them personally
3. get money and power from them to "fight" it
4. use some of that money and power to make your message more convincing and to broadcast it more widely
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why?quote:
[..]
Beantwoord eerst maar eens waarom een exponentiële kettingreactie in een kritische massa niet plaats kan vinden volgens jou.
I didn't write that.
I think you already know the (textbook) answer and you're asking me in order to draw me into some scientistic discussion, then you can at least appear to be right and/or clever in some way.
No amount of scientistic jargon (from you or anyone else) is going to make the ridiculous propaganda movies, miraculous survival/witness stories etc. all suddenly appear to be real or true in any way.
If you believe the 'atomic' bomb horror stories, maybe you can explain the scientistic technicalities of melting eye-balls/ skin/ x-rayed soldiers etc.
I'd've thought that eyeballs/skin/flesh etc. would fry/burn rather than melt....as I'd expect to happen in a fire-bombing raid for example.
If you don't believe the silly stories, maybe you can explain why we were told such things in the first place.
Fyne jaarwisseling allemaal.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Nee.quote:
Denk je dat atoomenergie één van de belangrijkste onderdelen is als je kernwapens aan het ontkennen bent? Of begin jij aan tafel ook met het toetje en eindig je met het voorgerecht?
Pannekoekje.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Nog maar een keer herhalen dan. Waarom moet iets nep zijn als het als punt voor fear mongering wordt gebruikt?quote:
[..]
'But why?' what? Try and be more clear with your questions (and answers) please.
https://issuepedia.org/Fearmongery
Fearmongery is a manipulative tool which is used by powermongers to gain political power by the following methodology:
1. invent an existential threat
2. convince gullible people that it threatens them personally
3. get money and power from them to "fight" it
4. use some of that money and power to make your message more convincing and to broadcast it more widely
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Goed,quote:
[..]
Why?
I didn't write that.
I think you already know the (textbook) answer and you're asking me in order to draw me into some scientistic discussion, then you can at least appear to be right and/or clever in some way.
No amount of scientistic jargon (from you or anyone else) is going to make the ridiculous propaganda movies, miraculous survival/witness stories etc. all suddenly appear to be real or true in any way.
If you believe the 'atomic' bomb horror stories, maybe you can explain the scientistic technicalities of melting eye-balls/ skin/ x-rayed soldiers etc.
I'd've thought that eyeballs/skin/flesh etc. would fry/burn rather than melt....as I'd expect to happen in a fire-bombing raid for example.
If you don't believe the silly stories, maybe you can explain why we were told such things in the first place.
Fyne jaarwisseling allemaal.
Vertel, is een atoombom nu mogelijk of niet? Dat lijk je namelijk te beweren. Je begint telkens over wat anders.
In Baden-Badener Badeseen kann man Baden-Badener baden sehen.
Allemaal toepasselijk op jouw berichten over atoombommen inderdaad.quote:
[..]
'But why?' what? Try and be more clear with your questions (and answers) please.
https://issuepedia.org/Fearmongery
Fearmongery is a manipulative tool which is used by powermongers to gain political power by the following methodology:
1. invent an existential threat
2. convince gullible people that it threatens them personally
3. get money and power from them to "fight" it
4. use some of that money and power to make your message more convincing and to broadcast it more widely
Conscience do cost.
Jij en allen die hier posten hetzelfde gewenstquote:
[..]
Why?
I didn't write that.
I think you already know the (textbook) answer and you're asking me in order to draw me into some scientistic discussion, then you can at least appear to be right and/or clever in some way.
No amount of scientistic jargon (from you or anyone else) is going to make the ridiculous propaganda movies, miraculous survival/witness stories etc. all suddenly appear to be real or true in any way.
If you believe the 'atomic' bomb horror stories, maybe you can explain the scientistic technicalities of melting eye-balls/ skin/ x-rayed soldiers etc.
I'd've thought that eyeballs/skin/flesh etc. would fry/burn rather than melt....as I'd expect to happen in a fire-bombing raid for example.
If you don't believe the silly stories, maybe you can explain why we were told such things in the first place.
Fyne jaarwisseling allemaal.
Thanks. Yes I know I am.quote:
[..]
Goed,
Vertel, is een atoombom nu mogelijk of niet? Dat lijk je namelijk te beweren. Je begint telkens over wat anders.
I've already made my opinion very clear as to whether I thinl atomic weapons exist or not. Nobody here has presented any information/response etc. to make me think otherwise.
I began and am continuing about the beginning of the (1940's-1960's) 'atomic age'. It's a big subject which requires time and energy to research, and then having the patience required to even bother replying to vague claims made by certain users here.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Not true.quote:
[..]
Allemaal toepasselijk op jouw berichten over atoombommen inderdaad.
You only post here to try and irritate people and disrupt any chance of 'discussion',. You never post anything regarding the content/information provided. The majority of your posts consist of sniping, nasty, personal remarks rather than anything which contributes to the 'discussion', which is likely a sociopathic trait on your part. You don't care about truth.
I still don't fully understand why people who seem to believe, and are satisfied with pretty much anything they see on the MSM 'news', post here.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Beantwoord de vraag eens i.p.v. zo te draaienquote:
[..]
Thanks. Yes I know I am.
I've already made my opinion very clear as to whether I thinl atomic weapons exist or not. Nobody here has presented any information/response etc. to make me think otherwise.
I began and am continuing about the beginning of the (1940's-1960's) 'atomic age'. It's a big subject which requires time and energy to research, and then having the patience required to even bother replying to vague claims made by certain users here.
In Baden-Badener Badeseen kann man Baden-Badener baden sehen.
Jij bent vooral degene die discussie ontwijktquote:
[..]
Not true.
You only post here to try and irritate people and disrupt any chance of 'discussion',.
In Baden-Badener Badeseen kann man Baden-Badener baden sehen.
Aah right, eerst de conclusies klaar hebben en dan met je onderzoek beginnen. Gotcha.quote:
[..]
Thanks. Yes I know I am.
I've already made my opinion very clear as to whether I thinl atomic weapons exist or not. Nobody here has presented any information/response etc. to make me think otherwise.
I began and am continuing about the beginning of the (1940's-1960's) 'atomic age'. It's a big subject which requires time and energy to research, and then having the patience required to even bother replying to vague claims made by certain users here.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
I still don't fully understand why people who seem to believe, and are satisfied with pretty much anything they see on youtube news', post here.quote:
[..]
I still don't fully understand why people who seem to believe, and are satisfied with pretty much anything they see on the MSM 'news', post here.
Conscience do cost.
No. You are wrong again.quote:
[..]
Aah right, eerst de conclusies klaar hebben en dan met je onderzoek beginnen. Gotcha.
You haven't read the post (in reply to Mr.Verdriet) properly.
[ Bericht 13% gewijzigd door SuperHartje op 16-01-2019 09:05:15 ]
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Je bent begonnen aan je onderzoek, terwijl je je conclusie daarvoor al klaar had. Seems pretty clear to me.quote:
[..]
No. You are wrong again.
You haven't read the post (in reply to Mr.Verdriet) properly.
[ Bericht 12% gewijzigd door SuperHartje op 16-01-2019 09:06:13 ]
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Maar is het mogelijk een atoombom te maken?quote:
[..]
No. You are wrong again.
You haven't read the post (in reply to Mr.Verdriet) properly.
[ Bericht 14% gewijzigd door SuperHartje op 16-01-2019 09:05:43 ]
Het antwoord op de belangrijkste vraag van alle vragen? 42!
Zou handig zijn als Tingo daar eens een duidelijk antwoord op gaf ja.quote:
[..]
Maar is het mogelijk een atoombom te maken?
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Zou je gewoon de vraag kunnen beantwoorden?quote:
[..]
No. You are wrong again.
You haven't read the post (in reply to Mr.Verdriet) properly.
PS : You really should make sure you have read the post properly before you make hasty smart-arsed replies, otherwise you'll end up looking even more stupid than you actually are.
In Baden-Badener Badeseen kann man Baden-Badener baden sehen.
Dit dus, dat heb je niet. Je impliceert op meerdere manieren te geloven dat bepaalde tests nep zijn, maar de directe vraag of je gelooft dat alle nukes niet kunnen bestaan blijf je maar ontwijken.quote:
I've already made my opinion very clear as to whether I thinl atomic weapons exist or not.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Beantwoord de vraag, is een atoombom (fissie) mogelijk, en als je dan toch bezig bent is een waterstofbom (fusie) mogelijk?quote:
[..]
Thanks. Yes I know I am.
I've already made my opinion very clear as to whether I thinl atomic weapons exist or not. Nobody here has presented any information/response etc. to make me think otherwise.
I began and am continuing about the beginning of the (1940's-1960's) 'atomic age'. It's a big subject which requires time and energy to research, and then having the patience required to even bother replying to vague claims made by certain users here.
In Baden-Badener Badeseen kann man Baden-Badener baden sehen.
Whether something is 'pretty clear' to you does not say much.....but that's ok, because you know very well that such information is thin on the ground...otherwise you'd've very happily posted it by now.quote:
[..]
Je bent begonnen aan je onderzoek, terwijl je je conclusie daarvoor al klaar had. Seems pretty clear to me.
[ Bericht 6% gewijzigd door SuperHartje op 16-01-2019 09:34:20 ]
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
I'm more interested in what we have been told over the last seven decades rather than what may or not be possible right now.quote:
[..]
Maar is het mogelijk een atoombom te maken?
Why do you believe 'atomic' bombs exist? Please be specific.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
It'd be quite something if you finally provided something to back up the vague claims you have made.quote:
[..]
Zou handig zijn als Tingo daar eens een duidelijk antwoord op gaf ja.
Don't be shy!
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Waarom heb je geen antwoord op de vraag?quote:
[..]
I'm more interested in what we have been told over the last seven decades rather than what may or not be possible right now.
Why do you believe 'atomic' bombs exist? Please be specific.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
quote:
[..]
I'm more interested in what we have been told over the last seven decades rather than what may or not be possible right now.
Why do you believe 'atomic' bombs exist? Please be specific.
quote:
[..]
It'd be quite something if you finally provided something to back up the vague claims you have made.
Don't be shy!
Beantwoord de vraag!quote:
[..]
Whether something is 'pretty clear' to you does not say much.....but that's ok, because you know very well that such information is thin on the ground...otherwise you'd've very happily posted it by now.
[ Bericht 23% gewijzigd door SuperHartje op 16-01-2019 09:35:54 ]
In Baden-Badener Badeseen kann man Baden-Badener baden sehen.
Weak. It was a simple question.quote:
[..]
I'm more interested in what we have been told over the last seven decades rather than what may or not be possible right now.
Why do you believe 'atomic' bombs exist? Please be specific.
Het antwoord op de belangrijkste vraag van alle vragen? 42!
Stel je voor, je opent een discussie en je wordt naar je positie in deze gevraagd.quote:
Nu maar hopen dat Tingo zich snel laat horen wat een despotie met al die rakkers.
In Baden-Badener Badeseen kann man Baden-Badener baden sehen.
Ik snap niet wat dat is met dat terugketsen van die bewijslast de hele tijd. Waarom zou een atoombom wél bestaan? Nou, misschien omdat de ontploffingen en achterliggende natuurkunde enorm uitgebreid gedocumenteerd zijn, omdat er legio slachtoffers bestaan, ga zo maar door.
Als je bananen ontkent, dan is de vraag toch ook niet "Waarom denk je dat bananen wél bestaan?"
Ik vind het niet meer dan normaal dat er in een topic waar atoomwapens ontkend worden, wordt gevraagd naar de achterliggende motivatie. Als het enige wat dan naar voren komt is "ik vind het er nep uit zien en het wordt gebruikt als fearmongering", dan is dat natuurlijk niet erg overtuigend.
Als je bananen ontkent, dan is de vraag toch ook niet "Waarom denk je dat bananen wél bestaan?"
Ik vind het niet meer dan normaal dat er in een topic waar atoomwapens ontkend worden, wordt gevraagd naar de achterliggende motivatie. Als het enige wat dan naar voren komt is "ik vind het er nep uit zien en het wordt gebruikt als fearmongering", dan is dat natuurlijk niet erg overtuigend.
My answer is not 'weak' at all, if that's what you mean.quote:
Anyway – whatever answer I gave would no doubt be met with one shitty remark or another, and I don't really care what you think, so it doesn't matter.
…....
Simple questions don't necessarily have simple answers.
Here's a simple question for you and your fellow 'nukers' :
Why do you believe that 'atomic' bombs have ever been used and/or tested?
Please give a few reasons which we can all understand.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Beantwoord de vraag nu eens.quote:
[..]
My answer is not 'weak' at all, if that's what you mean.
Anyway – whatever answer I gave would no doubt be met with one shitty remark or another, and I don't really care what you think, so it doesn't matter.
…....
Simple questions don't necessarily have simple answers.
Here's a simple question for you and your fellow 'nukers' :
Why do you believe that 'atomic' bombs have ever been used and/or tested?
Please give a few reasons which we can all understand.
In Baden-Badener Badeseen kann man Baden-Badener baden sehen.
Ja of nee kijkt mij een heel makkelijk antwoord.quote:
[..]
My answer is not 'weak' at all, if that's what you mean.
Anyway – whatever answer I gave would no doubt be met with one shitty remark or another, and I don't really care what you think, so it doesn't matter.
…....
Simple questions don't necessarily have simple answers.
Here's a simple question for you and your fellow 'nukers' :
Why do you believe that 'atomic' bombs have ever been used and/or tested?
Please give a few reasons which we can all understand.
Het antwoord op de belangrijkste vraag van alle vragen? 42!
I thought I'd been very clear about my opinion of 'atomic' bombs.quote:
[..]
Beantwoord de vraag nu eens.
Welke vraag precies?
I've asked questions which you and and your fellow nukers have completely ignored
Here's one of them - again.....
Why do you believe that 'atomic' bombs have ever been used and/or tested?
Please give a few reasons which we can all understand.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
I don't know....whether it is possible to make an atomic bomb or not will not make the mountain of idiotic imagery, propaganda films and miraculous survivor/witness statements any more real/believable.quote:
[..]
Maar is het mogelijk een atoombom te maken?
Anyway - another exciting day in football - fijn weekend verder allemaal!
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Deze vraagquote:
[..]
I thought I'd been very clear about my opinion of 'atomic' bombs.
Welke vraag precies?
Gewoon ophouden met draaien en een simpel ja of nee, en waarom niet bij een neequote:
[..]
Beantwoord de vraag, is een atoombom (fissie) mogelijk, en als je dan toch bezig bent is een waterstofbom (fusie) mogelijk?
In Baden-Badener Badeseen kann man Baden-Badener baden sehen.
Yes it's weak, i'd have more chance to balance my weight on a soap bubble than to keep your theory intact, that kind of weakness accurately describes your defense on the matter.quote:
[..]
My answer is not 'weak' at all, if that's what you mean.
Anyway – whatever answer I gave would no doubt be met with one shitty remark or another, and I don't really care what you think, so it doesn't matter.
…....
Simple questions don't necessarily have simple answers.
Here's a simple question for you and your fellow 'nukers' :
Why do you believe that 'atomic' bombs have ever been used and/or tested?
Please give a few reasons which we can all understand.
What makes me, us or anyone believe nuclear bombs exist? Oh, I don't know, maybe a gazillion amount of books and reports written about it? People believe in the bible and there's a lot more verifiable info on nuclear weapons in comparison, just saying. Maybe the numerous amounts of witness reports or the countless casualties, or maybe a simple reading from a geiger teller in an afflicted area? Maybe the fact that if you deny nuclear weapons you also deny nuclear energy? Just to name a couple of the most obvious reasons. A few reasons which we can all understand.
There is literally more information available on nuclear bombs than on strawberries, yet you don't deny the existence of those, do you now? If you want to deny all that, the burden of proof is on you, which is why i perfectly understand you consistently and continuously avoid answering any questions that pertain to the scientific part of the matter - because even touching the subject would of course void any sensible argument you think you have.
"Atom bombs are being used in movies (and) as fearmongery." simply doesn't cut it. Never has, never will. It doesn't make it fake just because they use it to scare and manipulate people. Plane crashes are being used as fearmongery aswell, are you gonna deny plane crashes?
There is not a single shred of scientific background to your claims that refute the existence of nuclear weapons.
P.S. If you're gonna base your reply around any possible spelling or grammar mistakes and not get into the matter, we'll all know what that means.
I don't know/ Ja/ nee.Whatever the answer might be to your question will not and does not make the ridiculous propaganda films,miraculous survival stories etc. any more believable.quote:
[..]
Beantwoord de vraag, is een atoombom (fissie) mogelijk, en als je dan toch bezig bent is een waterstofbom (fusie) mogelijk?
Please stop trying to haul me into some scientistic discussion where you (quite desperately) want to at least appear to be right. Don't try and 'blind us with science'.
Explain to us how eye-balls and skin can 'melt'.
Present some defintive information about the 'nuclear' EMP.
…......
Simple questions don't necessarily have simple answers.
Here's a simple question for you and your fellow 'nuker/nukists' :
Why do you believe that 'atomic' bombs have ever been used and/or tested?
I've asked myself the same question.
Please give a few simple but specific reasons which we can all understand.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Om meerdere redenen. Een aanzienlijk aantal werden bijvoorbeeld in view of the public getest. Over de natuurkunde achter kernwapens is in de loop van de decennia redelijk wat naar buiten gekomen, and it all makes sense. Kernenergie bestaat, in verschillende vormen. Etc. etc.quote:
[..]
I thought I'd been very clear about my opinion of 'atomic' bombs.
Welke vraag precies?
I've asked questions which you and and your fellow nukers have completely ignored
Here's one of them - again.....
Why do you believe that 'atomic' bombs have ever been used and/or tested?
Please give a few reasons which we can all understand.
Tel daar bij op de waslijst aan consequences als kernwapens nep zouden zijn.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
• Omdat de natuurkundige basis achter kernsplitsing vrij basic is.quote:
I've asked myself the same question.
Please give a few simple but specific reasons which we can all understand.
• Omdat een complot dat alle testen en toepassingen nep zijn, vele malen ongeloofwaardiger zijn dan dat die wapens gewoon ontwikkeld zijn.
Het is dezelfde vraag als "waarom geloof je dat je ouders je ouders zijn, en dat je niet geadopteerd bent terwijl alles op dat eerste wijst"?
Ik ben zelf natuurkundige, en al die vakken kernfysica en al die bijbehorende proefjes omtrent kernfysica en kwantummechanica zouden dan allemaal nep moeten zijn. En dat niet alleen: ook de structuur van b.v. sterren en de bijbehorende spectroscopie zouden allemaal herzien moeten worden.
Dan vraag ik mezelf af, wat waarschijnlijker is: dat dat inderdaad het geval is, of dat dit weer de zoveelste internet-complotdinges is. Na 15 jaar aan complotmensen en crackpots te hebben gesproken, is die keuze voor mij persoonlijk niet zo lastig.
-
Voor mij is de keuze ook niet zo lastig, fake media, fake history, fake sky, fake world.
Als je in discussie gaat met een trol, wint hij. Als je een trol beledigt, wint hij. Als je tekeer gaat tegen een trol, wint hij. Het enige waar trollen niet tegen kunnen, is te worden genegeerd.
quote:
[..]
I don't know/ Ja/ nee.Whatever the answer might be to your question will not and does not make the ridiculous propaganda films,miraculous survival stories etc. any more believable.
Please stop trying to haul me into some scientistic discussion where you (quite desperately) want to at least appear to be right. Don't try and 'blind us with science'.
Explain to us how eye-balls and skin can 'melt'.
Present some defintive information about the 'nuclear' EMP.
…......
Simple questions don't necessarily have simple answers.
Here's a simple question for you and your fellow 'nuker/nukists' :
Why do you believe that 'atomic' bombs have ever been used and/or tested?
I've asked myself the same question.
Please give a few simple but specific reasons which we can all understand.
Here you go.quote:
[..]
Yes it's weak, i'd have more chance to balance my weight on a soap bubble than to keep your theory intact, that kind of weakness accurately describes your defense on the matter.
What makes me, us or anyone believe nuclear bombs exist? Oh, I don't know, maybe a gazillion amount of books and reports written about it? People believe in the bible and there's a lot more verifiable info on nuclear weapons in comparison, just saying. Maybe the numerous amounts of witness reports or the countless casualties, or maybe a simple reading from a geiger teller in an afflicted area? Maybe the fact that if you deny nuclear weapons you also deny nuclear energy? Just to name a couple of the most obvious reasons. A few reasons which we can all understand.
There is literally more information available on nuclear bombs than on strawberries, yet you don't deny the existence of those, do you now? If you want to deny all that, the burden of proof is on you, which is why i perfectly understand you consistently and continuously avoid answering any questions that pertain to the scientific part of the matter - because even touching the subject would of course void any sensible argument you think you have.
"Atom bombs are being used in movies (and) as fearmongery." simply doesn't cut it. Never has, never will. It doesn't make it fake just because they use it to scare and manipulate people. Plane crashes are being used as fearmongery aswell, are you gonna deny plane crashes?
There is not a single shred of scientific background to your claims that refute the existence of nuclear weapons.
P.S. If you're gonna base your reply around any possible spelling or grammar mistakes and not get into the matter, we'll all know what that means.
En alleen een select clubje verlichten ziet de waarheidquote:
Voor mij is de keuze ook niet zo lastig, fake media, fake history, fake sky, fake world.
Iets met vaders, wensen en gedachten.
-
En fake nuclear power?quote:
Voor mij is de keuze ook niet zo lastig, fake media, fake history, fake sky, fake world.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Gelieve wel een beetje inhoudelijk te blijven.quote:
Voor mij is de keuze ook niet zo lastig, fake media, fake history, fake sky, fake world.
A child is born with no state of mind.
Deze is te mooi, want wat je hier op somt wat dus nep is, geeft mij aan dat deze post dus ook nep is. Aangezien dat gene wat nep is er juist voor zorgt dat je dit hier überhaupt kan typen.quote:
Voor mij is de keuze ook niet zo lastig, fake media, fake history, fake sky, fake world.
Er staat nog een vraag voor u open!!
Waarom beantwoord je de vraag niet? Je draait en komt met vragen, maar je neemt geen standpunt in.quote:
[..]
I don't know/ Ja/ nee.Whatever the answer might be to your question will not and does not make the ridiculous propaganda films,miraculous survival stories etc. any more believable.
Please stop trying to haul me into some scientistic discussion where you (quite desperately) want to at least appear to be right. Don't try and 'blind us with science'.
Explain to us how eye-balls and skin can 'melt'.
Present some defintive information about the 'nuclear' EMP.
…......
Simple questions don't necessarily have simple answers.
Here's a simple question for you and your fellow 'nuker/nukists' :
Why do you believe that 'atomic' bombs have ever been used and/or tested?
I've asked myself the same question.
Please give a few simple but specific reasons which we can all understand.
In Baden-Badener Badeseen kann man Baden-Badener baden sehen.
Dit kan overigens inderdaad niet door verstrooiing. Probeer maar eens met een lamp door je vinger te schijnen. Je hele vinger licht op, maar je ziet geen bot. Het licht verstrooit om het bot heen.quote:
[..]
[..]
Via linkje van ChrisCarter
Man van 80 die even een accountje maakt op een snopes forum om deze urban legend even te helpen levend te houden. Ik geloof het meteen.
Wat is jouw mening eigenlijk, zijn atoombommen mogelijk of niet?quote:
[ Bericht 15% gewijzigd door SuperHartje op 23-01-2019 16:18:25 ]
In Baden-Badener Badeseen kann man Baden-Badener baden sehen.
