quote:Op dinsdag 15 januari 2019 22:44 schreef Tingo het volgende:
[..]
I'm more interested in what we have been told over the last seven decades rather than what may or not be possible right now.
Why do you believe 'atomic' bombs exist? Please be specific.
quote:Op dinsdag 15 januari 2019 22:48 schreef Tingo het volgende:
[..]
It'd be quite something if you finally provided something to back up the vague claims you have made.
Don't be shy!
Beantwoord de vraag!quote:Op dinsdag 15 januari 2019 22:43 schreef Tingo het volgende:
[..]
Whether something is 'pretty clear' to you does not say much.....but that's ok, because you know very well that such information is thin on the ground...otherwise you'd've very happily posted it by now.
Weak. It was a simple question.quote:Op dinsdag 15 januari 2019 22:44 schreef Tingo het volgende:
[..]
I'm more interested in what we have been told over the last seven decades rather than what may or not be possible right now.
Why do you believe 'atomic' bombs exist? Please be specific.
Stel je voor, je opent een discussie en je wordt naar je positie in deze gevraagd.quote:Op woensdag 16 januari 2019 08:04 schreef controlaltdelete het volgende:
Nu maar hopen dat Tingo zich snel laat horen wat een despotie met al die rakkers.
My answer is not 'weak' at all, if that's what you mean.quote:
Beantwoord de vraag nu eens.quote:Op zaterdag 19 januari 2019 12:22 schreef Tingo het volgende:
[..]
My answer is not 'weak' at all, if that's what you mean.
Anyway – whatever answer I gave would no doubt be met with one shitty remark or another, and I don't really care what you think, so it doesn't matter.
…....
Simple questions don't necessarily have simple answers.
Here's a simple question for you and your fellow 'nukers' :
Why do you believe that 'atomic' bombs have ever been used and/or tested?
Please give a few reasons which we can all understand.
Ja of nee kijkt mij een heel makkelijk antwoord.quote:Op zaterdag 19 januari 2019 12:22 schreef Tingo het volgende:
[..]
My answer is not 'weak' at all, if that's what you mean.
Anyway – whatever answer I gave would no doubt be met with one shitty remark or another, and I don't really care what you think, so it doesn't matter.
…....
Simple questions don't necessarily have simple answers.
Here's a simple question for you and your fellow 'nukers' :
Why do you believe that 'atomic' bombs have ever been used and/or tested?
Please give a few reasons which we can all understand.
I thought I'd been very clear about my opinion of 'atomic' bombs.quote:Op zaterdag 19 januari 2019 12:33 schreef Pietverdriet het volgende:
[..]
Beantwoord de vraag nu eens.
I don't know....whether it is possible to make an atomic bomb or not will not make the mountain of idiotic imagery, propaganda films and miraculous survivor/witness statements any more real/believable.quote:Op dinsdag 15 januari 2019 14:38 schreef Vis1980 het volgende:
[..]
Maar is het mogelijk een atoombom te maken?
Deze vraagquote:Op zaterdag 19 januari 2019 13:22 schreef Tingo het volgende:
[..]
I thought I'd been very clear about my opinion of 'atomic' bombs.
Welke vraag precies?
Gewoon ophouden met draaien en een simpel ja of nee, en waarom niet bij een neequote:Op dinsdag 15 januari 2019 19:19 schreef Pietverdriet het volgende:
[..]
Beantwoord de vraag, is een atoombom (fissie) mogelijk, en als je dan toch bezig bent is een waterstofbom (fusie) mogelijk?
Yes it's weak, i'd have more chance to balance my weight on a soap bubble than to keep your theory intact, that kind of weakness accurately describes your defense on the matter.quote:Op zaterdag 19 januari 2019 12:22 schreef Tingo het volgende:
[..]
My answer is not 'weak' at all, if that's what you mean.
Anyway – whatever answer I gave would no doubt be met with one shitty remark or another, and I don't really care what you think, so it doesn't matter.
…....
Simple questions don't necessarily have simple answers.
Here's a simple question for you and your fellow 'nukers' :
Why do you believe that 'atomic' bombs have ever been used and/or tested?
Please give a few reasons which we can all understand.
I don't know/ Ja/ nee.Whatever the answer might be to your question will not and does not make the ridiculous propaganda films,miraculous survival stories etc. any more believable.quote:Op dinsdag 15 januari 2019 19:19 schreef Pietverdriet het volgende:
[..]
Beantwoord de vraag, is een atoombom (fissie) mogelijk, en als je dan toch bezig bent is een waterstofbom (fusie) mogelijk?
Om meerdere redenen. Een aanzienlijk aantal werden bijvoorbeeld in view of the public getest. Over de natuurkunde achter kernwapens is in de loop van de decennia redelijk wat naar buiten gekomen, and it all makes sense. Kernenergie bestaat, in verschillende vormen. Etc. etc.quote:Op zaterdag 19 januari 2019 13:22 schreef Tingo het volgende:
[..]
I thought I'd been very clear about my opinion of 'atomic' bombs.
Welke vraag precies?
I've asked questions which you and and your fellow nukers have completely ignored
Here's one of them - again.....
Why do you believe that 'atomic' bombs have ever been used and/or tested?
Please give a few reasons which we can all understand.
• Omdat de natuurkundige basis achter kernsplitsing vrij basic is.quote:Op maandag 21 januari 2019 23:59 schreef Tingo het volgende:
I've asked myself the same question.
Please give a few simple but specific reasons which we can all understand.
quote:Op maandag 21 januari 2019 23:59 schreef Tingo het volgende:
[..]
I don't know/ Ja/ nee.Whatever the answer might be to your question will not and does not make the ridiculous propaganda films,miraculous survival stories etc. any more believable.
Please stop trying to haul me into some scientistic discussion where you (quite desperately) want to at least appear to be right. Don't try and 'blind us with science'.
Explain to us how eye-balls and skin can 'melt'.
Present some defintive information about the 'nuclear' EMP.
…......
Simple questions don't necessarily have simple answers.
Here's a simple question for you and your fellow 'nuker/nukists' :
Why do you believe that 'atomic' bombs have ever been used and/or tested?
I've asked myself the same question.
Please give a few simple but specific reasons which we can all understand.
Here you go.quote:Op zaterdag 19 januari 2019 14:19 schreef illusions het volgende:
[..]
Yes it's weak, i'd have more chance to balance my weight on a soap bubble than to keep your theory intact, that kind of weakness accurately describes your defense on the matter.
What makes me, us or anyone believe nuclear bombs exist? Oh, I don't know, maybe a gazillion amount of books and reports written about it? People believe in the bible and there's a lot more verifiable info on nuclear weapons in comparison, just saying. Maybe the numerous amounts of witness reports or the countless casualties, or maybe a simple reading from a geiger teller in an afflicted area? Maybe the fact that if you deny nuclear weapons you also deny nuclear energy? Just to name a couple of the most obvious reasons. A few reasons which we can all understand.
There is literally more information available on nuclear bombs than on strawberries, yet you don't deny the existence of those, do you now? If you want to deny all that, the burden of proof is on you, which is why i perfectly understand you consistently and continuously avoid answering any questions that pertain to the scientific part of the matter - because even touching the subject would of course void any sensible argument you think you have.
"Atom bombs are being used in movies (and) as fearmongery." simply doesn't cut it. Never has, never will. It doesn't make it fake just because they use it to scare and manipulate people. Plane crashes are being used as fearmongery aswell, are you gonna deny plane crashes?
There is not a single shred of scientific background to your claims that refute the existence of nuclear weapons.
P.S. If you're gonna base your reply around any possible spelling or grammar mistakes and not get into the matter, we'll all know what that means.
En alleen een select clubje verlichten ziet de waarheidquote:Op dinsdag 22 januari 2019 10:52 schreef controlaltdelete het volgende:
Voor mij is de keuze ook niet zo lastig, fake media, fake history, fake sky, fake world.
En fake nuclear power?quote:Op dinsdag 22 januari 2019 10:52 schreef controlaltdelete het volgende:
Voor mij is de keuze ook niet zo lastig, fake media, fake history, fake sky, fake world.
Gelieve wel een beetje inhoudelijk te blijven.quote:Op dinsdag 22 januari 2019 10:52 schreef controlaltdelete het volgende:
Voor mij is de keuze ook niet zo lastig, fake media, fake history, fake sky, fake world.
Deze is te mooi, want wat je hier op somt wat dus nep is, geeft mij aan dat deze post dus ook nep is. Aangezien dat gene wat nep is er juist voor zorgt dat je dit hier überhaupt kan typen.quote:Op dinsdag 22 januari 2019 10:52 schreef controlaltdelete het volgende:
Voor mij is de keuze ook niet zo lastig, fake media, fake history, fake sky, fake world.
Waarom beantwoord je de vraag niet? Je draait en komt met vragen, maar je neemt geen standpunt in.quote:Op maandag 21 januari 2019 23:59 schreef Tingo het volgende:
[..]
I don't know/ Ja/ nee.Whatever the answer might be to your question will not and does not make the ridiculous propaganda films,miraculous survival stories etc. any more believable.
Please stop trying to haul me into some scientistic discussion where you (quite desperately) want to at least appear to be right. Don't try and 'blind us with science'.
Explain to us how eye-balls and skin can 'melt'.
Present some defintive information about the 'nuclear' EMP.
…......
Simple questions don't necessarily have simple answers.
Here's a simple question for you and your fellow 'nuker/nukists' :
Why do you believe that 'atomic' bombs have ever been used and/or tested?
I've asked myself the same question.
Please give a few simple but specific reasons which we can all understand.
Dit kan overigens inderdaad niet door verstrooiing. Probeer maar eens met een lamp door je vinger te schijnen. Je hele vinger licht op, maar je ziet geen bot. Het licht verstrooit om het bot heen.quote:Op vrijdag 14 december 2018 15:46 schreef DupingDelight het volgende:
[..]
[..]
Via linkje van ChrisCarter
Man van 80 die even een accountje maakt op een snopes forum om deze urban legend even te helpen levend te houden. Ik geloof het meteen.
Wat is jouw mening eigenlijk, zijn atoombommen mogelijk of niet?quote:
Forum Opties | |
---|---|
Forumhop: | |
Hop naar: |