twitter:kylegriffin1 twitterde op vrijdag 14-12-2018 om 19:30:32 GREEN BAY, Wis. (AP) — Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker signs Republican lame-duck legislation weakening powers of Democrat who defeated him. reageer retweet
twitter:kaitlancollins twitterde op vrijdag 14-12-2018 om 20:33:05 Earlier this week, Sen. Hatch shrugged off President Trump being implicated by prosecutors in two crimes committed by Michael Cohen, telling @mkraju, "I don't care, all I can say is he's doing a good job as President." Now he says he regrets the remark. https://t.co/0XNOq4G5zU https://t.co/SVn3zyklgH reageer retweet
Jammer. The Weekly Standard was een van de weinig overgebleven rechtse publicaties die zich nog wel onafhankelijk ten opzichte van Trump opstelde.twitter:oliverdarcy twitterde op vrijdag 14-12-2018 om 20:02:14 I obtained audio of today's staff meeting where Clarity Media Group announced the closure of The Weekly Standard. Clarity's CEO told employees, "Don't get on social media and attack anybody because it will put your severance in jeopardy" https://t.co/ddTXTUesGc reageer retweet
Dat moet over Clinton gaan!quote:Op vrijdag 14 december 2018 19:56 schreef westwoodblvd het volgende:
Spannend verhaal over een geheimzinnige rechtszaak die gevoerd wordt over een dagvaarding om een getuigenis af te leggen tussen enerzijds Mueller en anderzijds een onbekende getuige. Iedere keer als er in deze zaak een hoorzitting is, gaat de hele verdieping op slot, wordt het gebouw gescand voor achtergelaten opnameapparatuur en worden alle journalisten naar buiten gestuurd.
Dat gaat dan ongeveer zo:
Reporters shooed away as mystery Mueller subpoena fight rages on
https://www.politico.com/(...)bpoena-fight-1065409
Trump’s Inauguration Paid Trump’s Company — With Ivanka in the Middletwitter:kylegriffin1 twitterde op vrijdag 14-12-2018 om 22:00:06 Trump's inauguration paid the Trump Org. for rooms, meals and event space at Trump's D.C. hotel.Ivanka was involved in negotiating prices. A top inaugural planner expressed concern the hotel was overcharging. The spending could be a violation of the law. https://t.co/tAC96DVFYW reageer retweet
quote:As the inaugural committee planned the landmark celebration, internal concerns were raised about whether Trump’s Washington hotel was overcharging for event space. The spending could be a violation of the law.
[..]
twitter:pacificlife twitterde op vrijdag 14-12-2018 om 20:47:37 A message from Pacific Life: https://t.co/bDq9hzia53 reageer retweet
Dude....twitter:GeorgePapa19 twitterde op vrijdag 14-12-2018 om 21:23:51 It is true. I will be running for Congress in 2020, and I will win. Stay tuned. reageer retweet
Gekkenhuis!quote:Op vrijdag 14 december 2018 23:02 schreef Ulx het volgende:Dude....twitter:GeorgePapa19 twitterde op vrijdag 14-12-2018 om 21:23:51 It is true. I will be running for Congress in 2020, and I will win. Stay tuned. reageer retweet
twitter:ScottMStedman twitterde op vrijdag 14-12-2018 om 22:00:54 Breaking: The FBI is actively investigating George Papadopoulos and his alleged ties to Russia, even after his prison term. https://t.co/8UPOvT0igz reageer retweet
twitter:realDonaldTrump twitterde op vrijdag 14-12-2018 om 23:18:15 I am pleased to announce that Mick Mulvaney, Director of the Office of Management & Budget, will be named Acting White House Chief of Staff, replacing General John Kelly, who has served our Country with distinction. Mick has done an outstanding job while in the Administration.... reageer retweet
twitter:bert_gilfoyle twitterde op vrijdag 14-12-2018 om 23:24:03 @Acosta Mick Mulvaney: "wait, what?" reageer retweet
Echt!twitter:thehill twitterde op vrijdag 14-12-2018 om 23:31:00 White House Deputy Press Secretary Hogan Gidley: "The President of the United States has one job at the inauguration: it's to show up, to thank everyone for the service to get him elected, & then also dance with the First Lady. He did all of those things." https://t.co/E5R7gvJcuJ https://t.co/NLpWST9vub reageer retweet
Het klinkt wel echt wanhopig.quote:Op vrijdag 14 december 2018 23:57 schreef Kijkertje het volgende:Echt!twitter:thehill twitterde op vrijdag 14-12-2018 om 23:31:00 White House Deputy Press Secretary Hogan Gidley: "The President of the United States has one job at the inauguration: it's to show up, to thank everyone for the service to get him elected, & then also dance with the First Lady. He did all of those things." https://t.co/E5R7gvJcuJ https://t.co/NLpWST9vub reageer retweet
twitter:hardball twitterde op zaterdag 15-12-2018 om 01:30:41 Throughout the 2016 campaign, Trump frequently warned voters that Hillary Clinton would spend her entire presidency under investigation if elected: https://t.co/onyB4tz4Cu reageer retweet
unrolled, in text:twitter:nicholas_bagley twitterde op zaterdag 15-12-2018 om 01:57:39 The Texas decision on the Affordable Care Act is out. The individual mandate is unconstitutional, the court rules, and the mandate can't be severed from the rest of the Act. https://t.co/vWgTU8Cdsq reageer retweet
en met verwijzingen: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1073743858876514304.htmlquote:The Texas decision on the Affordable Care Act is out. The individual mandate is unconstitutional, the court rules, and the mandate can't be severed from the rest of the Act.
The court's decision is NOT limited to guaranteed issue and community rating. In the court's view -- and this is *absolutely* insane -- the entire Affordable Care Act is unconstitutional.
Procedurally, however, the court has not granted an injunction. He has instead treated the red states' motion for a preliminary injunction as a request for summary judgment.
The court's decision is also not limited to the plaintiff red states. That means the blue states -- California et al. -- can take an appeal.
Because there's no injunction (not yet, anyhow) the Trump administration would not be in contempt if it continued to implement the ACA. Nor, I think, does it need to secure a stay pending appeal -- though I could be wrong about that. Which means that EVERYONE SHOULD STAY CALM.
As I've said before, reasonable minds can differ about whether a penalty-free individual mandate is unconstitutional, as the court has said. All the action is on whether the mandate is severable.
Oh, by the way -- he issued this decision the night that open enrollment ended. You think that was a coincidence? I've got a bridge to sell you.
On severability, the judge cites the relevant legal standard. You would've thought that would have resolved the question: we all know that Congress in 2017 wanted an ACA without the mandate. Why? Because that's what it voted for.
The judge starts by going by to the 2010 Congress, which thought the individual mandate essential. Now, that doesn't imply that THE WHOLE STATUTE has to fall if the individual mandate goes. But that's how the judge reads it.
The intent of the 2010 Congress, however, isn't what matters here. So all the real fighting happens in the judge's discussion of the 2017 Congress. And that's where things get weird.
"There is no answer." Seriously? Hey, Judge O'Connor, I'm old enough to have lived through the repeal-and-replace debate. IT WAS LAST YEAR. And I'm confident about two things: (1) that Congress didn't repeal the whole ACA, and (2) that it did repeal the mandate penalty.
As for the claim that the penalty was not the individual mandate, that'd have come as a surprise to every Republican official who said they'd REPEALED THE INDIVIDUAL MANDATE. If you're measuring congressional intent, shouldn't that matter?
Oh, it gets better! He says that it's the blue states that are asking him to be an activist judge!
He goes on in that vein: "Nothing to see here, I'm just doing my job." if you can read this claim that he's just a judicial minimalist without gales of laughter, you're a better person than I am.
I haven't even gotten to the standing analysis, such as it is. The judge here says that the plaintiffs -- two individuals -- are subject to the "individual mandate," and therefore suffer injury.
Never mind that this individual mandate -- the purported unconstitutionality of which is SUCH A BIG DEAL that the entire rest of the ACA has to fall -- IS COMPLETELY UNENFORCEABLE.
The judge credulously accepts the individual plaintiffs' claims that they would be "freed from arbitrary governance." But eliminating the mandate penalty did exactly that. It freed them!
I'm gobsmacked. This judge honestly thinks the Constitution requires the elimination of the entire ACA -- including its Medicaid expansion, its provisions about calorie counts at chain restaurants, and its new rules on biosimilars -- because of an unenforceable "mandate"?
If you were ever tempted to think that right-wing judges weren't activist -- that they were only "enforcing the Constitution" or "reading the statute" -- this will persuade you to knock it off. This is insanity in print, and it will not stand up on appeal.
Ik kan me nog een zekere user herinneren die hier beweerde dat wetten maar via het congres moeten worden gemaakt en niet via de rechter. Benieuwd wat die hiervan vindt.quote:Op zaterdag 15 december 2018 02:46 schreef ExtraWaskracht het volgende:
Uitspraak over de zaak van het niet meer verplichten van een boete voor het niet afsluiten van een ACA verzekering. Draadje van een rechtenprofessor:unrolled, in text:twitter:nicholas_bagley twitterde op zaterdag 15-12-2018 om 01:57:39 The Texas decision on the Affordable Care Act is out. The individual mandate is unconstitutional, the court rules, and the mandate can't be severed from the rest of the Act. https://t.co/vWgTU8Cdsq reageer retweet
[..]
en met verwijzingen: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1073743858876514304.html
Weer een politieke stok voor de Democraten om mee te slaan richting de Republikeinen.quote:Op zaterdag 15 december 2018 02:46 schreef ExtraWaskracht het volgende:
Uitspraak over de zaak van het niet meer verplichten van een boete voor het niet afsluiten van een ACA verzekering. Draadje van een rechtenprofessor:unrolled, in text:twitter:nicholas_bagley twitterde op zaterdag 15-12-2018 om 01:57:39 The Texas decision on the Affordable Care Act is out. The individual mandate is unconstitutional, the court rules, and the mandate can't be severed from the rest of the Act. https://t.co/vWgTU8Cdsq reageer retweet
[..]
en met verwijzingen: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1073743858876514304.html
Ook de enige waar Trump van wint in Ohio. Maar hij wint niet een beetje maar gewoon +6.quote:Op zaterdag 15 december 2018 16:10 schreef westwoodblvd het volgende:
Dat Warren in haar home state derde scoort in de peilingen zou haar genoeg moeten zeggen over haar kansen. Als de Dems haar nomineren dan wordt dat een drama.
Dit soort peilingen zeggen nog steeds vrij weinig zonder dat de campagne is begonnen. Biden en Sanders staan nog steeds hoofdzakelijk bovenaan op basis van naamsbekendheid. Ik moet ook nog maar zien of die twee nog trek hebben in een dergelijke campagne.quote:Op zaterdag 15 december 2018 16:10 schreef westwoodblvd het volgende:
Dat Warren in haar home state derde scoort in de peilingen zou haar genoeg moeten zeggen over haar kansen. Als de Dems haar nomineren dan wordt dat een drama.
Forum Opties | |
---|---|
Forumhop: | |
Hop naar: |