https://www.reuters.com/a(...)uclear-idUSKBN1AC1TIquote:Hypothetically speaking, U.S. Admiral says ready for nuclear strike on China if Trump so ordered
The U.S. Pacific Fleet commander, addressing a security conference in Australia, said in answer to a question on Thursday that he would be prepared to launch a nuclear strike on China if President Donald Trump so ordered.
The fleet spokesman later said the question was asked as an "outrageous hypothetical".
Admiral Scott Swift was speaking at the Australian National University in Canberra when he was asked whether he would be prepared to launch a nuclear attack on China if ordered to do so by Trump.
"The answer would be yes," he said.
Swift said that all members of the U.S. military had sworn an oath to obey officers and the U.S. president as commander in chief to defend the constitution.
"This is core to the American democracy," he said, in a recording of the event obtained by Reuters.
"Any time you have a military that is moving away from a focus, and an allegiance, to civilian control, then we really have significant problems."
Hij moet wel een order tekenen eerst. Wat moeten ze met 1 tweet?quote:Op donderdag 27 juli 2017 18:41 schreef SureD1 het volgende:
DoD negeert de order van POTUS dus gewoon...
Prima...
quote:"There will be no modifications to the current policy until the President's direction has been received by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary has issued implementation guidance."
twitter:realDonaldTrump twitterde op woensdag 26-07-2017 om 14:55:58After consultation with my Generals and military experts, please be advised that the United States Government will not accept or allow...... reageer retweet
De Neurenberg tribunalen hebben anders aangetoond dat "Befehl ist Befehl" geen geaccepteerde schulduitsluitingsgrond is.quote:Op donderdag 27 juli 2017 18:45 schreef crystal_meth het volgende:
[..]
https://www.reuters.com/a(...)uclear-idUSKBN1AC1TI
Blind allegiance...
http://ifpnews.com/exclus(...)-anti-iran-sanction/quote:US to Kill JCPOA by Passing New Anti-Iran Sanctions: Deputy FM
Iran’s top nuclear negotiator has slammed the ‘hostile’ move by the US House of Representatives to impose new sanctions against the Islamic Republic, saying the decision would kill the nuclear deal between Tehran and world powers.
Iran’s Deputy Foreign Ministry for Legal and International Affairs, Seyyed Abbas Araqchi, said on Wednesday the discussions underway in the US Congress to pass a new law against Iran, North Korea and Russia amount to a totally hostile move against these countries.
Speaking on the sidelines of a seminar in Tehran, Araqchi said Iran will give a crushing response to the United States’ next move.
“Over the past years, we have always been targeted by the US government and Congress’ hostile moves and the hostilities are not limited to the incumbent government and congress,” he said.
According to a Farsi Report by ISNA, he went on saying that the anti-Iran bill which is under discussion in the US Congress does not impose new sanctions against the Islamic Republic in new fields. “The new law, if approved, is in fact a wrap-up of all the US sanctions imposed on Iran over the past years in non-nuclear fields,” Araqchi noted.
The Iranian diplomat also warned that the new law, if approved, will hamper the implementation of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and also deprive Iran of its rights under the nuclear deal.
“The new law violates various articles of the JCPOA. The US was obliged to fulfil its pledges under the deal with goodwill and a constructive approach and avoid any move violating its implementation. These are parts of the US commitments under the deal,” he added.
The deputy foreign minister also said the US House’s move stands in stark contrast with these commitments and Iran will never remain silent towards the violation.
[..]
http://thehill.com/news-b(...)anian-military-sitesquote:US seeks new inspections on Iranian military sites: report
President Trump is pushing for inspections of Iranian military sites as he considers canceling the Obama-era nuclear agreement with Tehran, senior U.S. officials told The Associated Press.
The inspections of the suspicious sites are meant to remedy flaws in the existing deal, according to the news service, and are part of an aggressive new administration push to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons.
Trump harshly criticized the Iranian agreement during his campaign and presidency, saying he was willing to scrap the plan.
Iran's compliance with the requests for the new inspections may provide the administration with a clear path of action, the AP noted.
Administration officials clashed earlier this month over recertifying Iran's compliance with the agreement.
Trump reluctantly agreed to certify Iran's compliance at the request of Cabinet members, after the International Atomic Energy Agency said that Tehran's infractions were minor.
The new strategy will also include negotiations with European nations on a follow-up agreement aimed at halting Iran's nuclear development, after the current deal expires in about 10 years, according to the AP.
Iran on Thursday successfully tested a satellite-carrying rocket after promising a response to proposed U.S. sanctions over Tehran's ballistic missile program.
http://www.news.com.au/wo(...)e4156eaa34098eb54e62quote:Iran launches rocket into space
IRAN successfully launched a satellite-carrying rocket into space on Thursday, the country’s state media reported without elaborating.
Iranian state television described the launch as involving a “Simorgh” rocket that is capable of carrying a satellite weighing 250 kilograms. The state media report did not elaborate on the rocket’s payload. “Simorgh” means “phoenix” in Farsi.
The website YJC.ir, which is affiliated with Iranian state television, as well as the semi-official Fars news agency, also reported the launch on Thursday, saying it was successful.
The launch comes as the United States has criticised Iran’s ballistic missile tests.
Anderzijds was het waarschijnlijk het beste antwoord op die vraag, ongeacht of hij het meent of niet. Een genuanceerd antwoord met verwijzing naar war crime wetgeving etc. zou hem problemen bezorgen.quote:Op donderdag 27 juli 2017 18:56 schreef SureD1 het volgende:
[..]
De Neurenberg tribunalen hebben anders aangetoond dat "Befehl ist Befehl" geen geaccepteerde schulduitsluitingsgrond is.
Klopt... maar ik mag hopen dat mocht hij ooit de order krijgen hij zijn post acuut neerlegt...quote:Op donderdag 27 juli 2017 19:16 schreef crystal_meth het volgende:
[..]
Anderzijds was het waarschijnlijk het beste antwoord op die vraag, ongeacht of hij het meent of niet. Een genuanceerd antwoord met verwijzing naar war crime wetgeving etc. zou hem problemen bezorgen.
Trump = Caesar Tiberius?quote:Op donderdag 27 juli 2017 16:41 schreef pullup het volgende:
[..]
Lol, die is bijna nog gekker dan de baas
In his head, there are loads of ´my generals´.quote:Op donderdag 27 juli 2017 18:54 schreef xpompompomx het volgende:
Wel grappig dat dit dan kennelijk totaal gelogen is:twitter:realDonaldTrump twitterde op woensdag 26-07-2017 om 14:55:58After consultation with my Generals and military experts, please be advised that the United States Government will not accept or allow...... reageer retweet
twitter:Alexruoff twitterde op donderdag 27-07-2017 om 19:43:22Lindsey Graham will meet with parliamentarian to see if Graham-Cassidy can pass reconciliation. If not, he's a "no" on skinny repeal reageer retweet
twitter:Alexruoff twitterde op donderdag 27-07-2017 om 19:43:54So parliamentarian might kill repeal in a way no one could have guessed. reageer retweet
Terecht, het was ook een schijtvertoningquote:Op donderdag 27 juli 2017 19:48 schreef pullup het volgende:
Zelfs het opperhoofd van de padvinders maakt zijn excuses over de speech van Trump nu![]()
http://time.com/4876705/d(...)speech/?xid=homepage
Wat een winnaar ook he.quote:Op donderdag 27 juli 2017 19:49 schreef ExtraWaskracht het volgende:
twitter:Alexruoff twitterde op donderdag 27-07-2017 om 19:43:22Lindsey Graham will meet with parliamentarian to see if Graham-Cassidy can pass reconciliation. If not, he's a "no" on skinny repeal reageer retweet
twitter:Alexruoff twitterde op donderdag 27-07-2017 om 19:43:54So parliamentarian might kill repeal in a way no one could have guessed. reageer retweet
Skinny repeal me if oldtwitter:SarahHuckabee twitterde op woensdag 26-07-2017 om 22:07:50Dylan aka Pickle thank you for your letter and hope to meet you soon! https://t.co/XZlJARZ9cs reageer retweet
Ik ben benieuwd naar een goede longread of een 2doc over Dylan Pickle...quote:Op donderdag 27 juli 2017 19:53 schreef Vis1980 het volgende:
[..]
Wat een winnaar ook he.Skinny repeal me if oldtwitter:SarahHuckabee twitterde op woensdag 26-07-2017 om 22:07:50Dylan aka Pickle thank you for your letter and hope to meet you soon! https://t.co/XZlJARZ9cs reageer retweet
[ afbeelding ]
quote:Op donderdag 27 juli 2017 19:53 schreef Vis1980 het volgende:
[..]
Wat een winnaar ook he.Skinny repeal me if oldtwitter:SarahHuckabee twitterde op woensdag 26-07-2017 om 22:07:50Dylan aka Pickle thank you for your letter and hope to meet you soon! https://t.co/XZlJARZ9cs reageer retweet
[ afbeelding ]
quote:White House changes press briefing transcript to make Trump’s golf skills more flattering
(..)
In the transcript of the briefing on the White House website, the “three-foot putts” that Scaramucci referenced has been changed to “30-foot putts.”
https://www.dailydot.com/(...)putts-quote-changed/
Zijn tere ego zou nog veel harder gekrenkt worden door een impeachment...quote:Op donderdag 27 juli 2017 20:29 schreef FlipjeHolland het volgende:
oom donald wil gewoon heel erg graag impeached worden maar hij krijgt t gewoon niet voor elkaar. hij haalt steeds gekkere stunts uit maar de republikeinen steken liever hun kop in t zand dan dat ze hem de eer gunnen.
ik denk dat die zelf ook veel liever in zijn ivoren trump toren zit en beetje louche zaken deals doet dan elke dag zn tere ego gekrenkt zien worden door die verdraaide fake news journalisten.
Nee ik denk ook nog steeds dat het in het begin een grap was en toen hij de kandidaat werd ging hij rare dingen zeggen om maar niet van Clinton te winnen. Het kan gewoon niet dat iemand zoveel domme dingen doet tenzij het bewust isquote:Op donderdag 27 juli 2017 20:42 schreef Whiskers2009 het volgende:
[..]
Zijn tere ego zou nog veel harder gekrenkt worden door een impeachment...
Ah, the South Park hypothesis...quote:Op donderdag 27 juli 2017 21:17 schreef vipergts het volgende:
[..]
Nee ik denk ook nog steeds dat het in het begin een grap was en toen hij de kandidaat werd ging hij rare dingen zeggen om maar niet van Clinton te winnen. Het kan gewoon niet dat iemand zoveel domme dingen doet tenzij het bewust is
Forum Opties | |
---|---|
Forumhop: | |
Hop naar: |