EU wil asielzoekers verdelen #9 Waar migranten blijven komen

quote:

Op maandag 21 september 2015 00:18 schreef JanKorteachternaam het volgende:

[..]

Ik zeg gewoon grenzen dicht voor elke asielzoeker. Japanse aanpak. Allemaal terugsturen naar de regio. Het belang van Nederland en de Nederlanders moet onvoorwaardelijk op nummer 1 staan.

quote:

Op maandag 21 september 2015 00:21 schreef JanKorteachternaam het volgende:

[..]

Gewoon er uit gooien dat volk. Kappen met dat correcte gedoe. De illegalen die hier naartoe komen bedonderen de zaak, dan hoeven wij ook niet correct te zijn. Bovendien zegt het VN Vluchtelingen verdrag niets over vingerafdrukken. Gewoon uitzetten naar Turkije.

quote:

Op maandag 21 september 2015 00:24 schreef JanKorteachternaam het volgende:
Het is te gek voor woorden dat we ons laten ringeloren door een stel achterlijken.

Tijd om out-of-the-box te denken. Als ze echt niet teruggestuurd kunnen worden zoals sommigen hier zeggen, stuur ze dan naar Griekenland. Zet in Griekenland grote kampen op. Op deze manier kan Griekenland de schuld die ze bij ons hebben voldoen.

quote:

Ondertussen moet het vluchtelingen verdrag worden opgezegd. Er dient een nieuw verdrag te komen dat alleen geldig is in alle niet-islamitische landen van Europa, Australië, Canada en de VS.

quote:

Op maandag 21 september 2015 00:29 schreef LTVDK het volgende:

[..]

Japan is natuurlijk totaal niet te vergelijken, dat is een eiland zonder grenzen op land. Dan is het een stuk makkelijk 'tegen' te houden dan iets onrealistisch als een hek om een heel continent.

quote:

The limits to Turkey’s hospitality

With no end in sight to the flow of Syrian refugees from Turkey to Greece, and the inevitable tragedies connected with this dangerous form of migration, the time has come for Turkey to answer this uncomfortable question: Why do all these Syrians want to leave Turkey and take such immense risks to reach the European Union?

If one were to believe Turkish politicians and analysts, Turkey has done a great job with its open-door policy for over 2 million Syrians escaping the horrors in their country. Turkey is the largest refugee-hosting country in the world and, apparently for that reason alone, its refugee policy is beyond doubt or criticism. The ones to blame are the Europeans, who refuse to share the burden because they are selfish, racist and/or Islamophobic. As I wrote before, there are indeed many good reasons to criticize European countries for the lack of a just and effective common policy. Having said that, the question remains why hundreds of thousands of Syrian refugees still prefer to leave the Turkish heaven and enter the European hell. The answer is simple: For Syrian refugees, Turkey is not heaven and Europe is not hell.

Let there be no misunderstanding: Since the start of the civil war in Syria in 2011, Turkey behaved extremely generously, giving every Syrian refugee the right to have an unlimited duration of stay in Turkey. State-of-the-art camps were set up along the border, and Syrians out of the camps were helped, for instance with access to the Turkish healthcare system. I am sure all of them are and will remain grateful for this modern version of the traditional Turkish hospitality. But there have always been certain limits as well and they are becoming clearer every day. In a recent, very insightful article on the website The Disorder of Things, Can Mutlu, assistant professor at Bilkent University in Ankara, explained what these structural problems are.

First, Syrian refugees cannot apply for asylum in Turkey, but live under a temporary protection regime based on the expectation that one day, hopefully soon, the Syrian guests will return home. That status does not give them the right to employment, which means in practice that many either do not have a job or have to work for incredibly low wages and under poor health and safety conditions. It is true that some Syrians managed to organize a new life for themselves in Turkey, but the majority did not. On top of that comes a growing feeling among many Turks that “the” Syrians, with their access to the Turkish social welfare, health and education systems, are becoming a burden too heavy to carry for Turkey in times when the economic prospects are not so bright anymore, unemployment is on the rise and the lira has plummeted.

Again, Turkey offered a great temporary solution but is now in dire need of a long-term one knowing the refugees are not going to return home any time soon.

The crumbling social acceptance of large numbers of non-integrated refugees is a common problem facing many other countries as well. The point is that Ankara seems unwilling to accept this unpleasant reality and act on it.

One way to do so would be to reconsider the infamous “geographical limitation” that is a key component of Turkey's refugee policy. It basically means that, for historical reasons, only Europeans can apply for asylum in Turkey. The rest are condemned to stay here without a status, wait years for approval by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) (waiting time now almost 10 years) or move on to a country that does offer Syrians refugees the chance to be recognized as a refugee and start a new life. As stated by many Syrian refugees, at the moment their crucial problem with Turkey is the fact that they can survive here, but they cannot live and prosper. Turkey offering at least some of them the possibility to become an integral part of society by providing them with a permanent status would be one of the ways to convince Syrians to stay in Turkey and not put their lives at risk in shaky rubber boats.
At the moment, another reason for Turkey not to allow Syrians to leave Turkey for Europe through legal and regular means is a set of agreements between Turkey and the EU. It includes the right of EU member states to send back migrants that cross into EU territory via Turkey if their asylum application is rejected. Why not interpret this re-admission agreement in a more flexible way, albeit temporarily, and allow Turkey to help Syrian refugees reach the EU in a safe way because almost all of them are sure to be recognized as such once they have arrived in Europe? Why not discuss this option with Donald Tusk, the president of the European Council, when he visits Turkey this week?

One way or the other, Turkey can no longer hide behind its laudable policies of the past. It has to come up with solutions for the urgent problems of today and tomorrow.

http://www.todayszaman.co(...)pitality_398568.html

quote:

Op maandag 21 september 2015 09:47 schreef Odaiba het volgende:

Huge crowd of Migrant Muslims attack police in Germany -Please wake up