quote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 10:29 schreef DeJori het volgende:
Bekijk de tweet van @BBCBreaking: https://twitter.com/BBCBreaking/status/448028481684013056
Lekker op tijd
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26713727quote:Ukraine orders Crimea withdrawal
Ukraine's interim President Olexander Turchynov says he has ordered the withdrawal of armed forces from Crimea.
The decision was taken because of Russian threats to the lives of military staff and their families, the president announced.
Russian troops have seized most of Ukraine's bases in the peninsula, including the naval base at Feodosia.
twitter:HaraldDoornbos twitterde op maandag 24-03-2014 om 10:40:11Karzai steunt Rusland. RT @nyt Afghan Leader Supports Russia’s Annexation of Crimea http://t.co/IUw7dWdjFe reageer retweet
Tja, Karzai wordt onder druk gezet om de security agreement te tekenen, had weer drie Amerikaanse senatoren op bezoek; je vraagt je af waarom de Amerikanen zoveel moeite doen als er op 5 april een nieuwe president gekozen wordt, en de drie belangrijkste kandidaten (volgens de VS) bereid zijn te tekenen.quote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 11:11 schreef theNull het volgende:
twitter:HaraldDoornbos twitterde op maandag 24-03-2014 om 10:40:11Karzai steunt Rusland. RT @nyt Afghan Leader Supports Russia’s Annexation of Crimea http://t.co/IUw7dWdjFe reageer retweet
lolquote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 17:28 schreef SadPanda het volgende:
Time to grab guns and kill damn Russians – Tymoshenko in leaked tape
http://rt.com/news/tymoshenko-calls-destroy-russia-917/
Fantastisch wijf dus... not.
quote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 17:28 schreef SadPanda het volgende:
Time to grab guns and kill damn Russians – Tymoshenko in leaked tape
http://rt.com/news/tymoshenko-calls-destroy-russia-917/
Fantastisch wijf dus... not.
http://rt.com/news/tymoshenko-calls-destroy-russia-917/quote:Tymoshenko confirmed the authenticity of the conversation on Twitter, while pointing out that a section where she is heard to call for the nuclear slaughter of the eight million Russians who remain on Ukrainian territory was edited.
She tweeted “The conversation took place, but the '8 million Russians in Ukraine' piece is an edit. In fact, I said Russians in Ukraine – are Ukrainians. Hello FSBSorry for the obscene language.”
The former Ukrainian PM has not clarified who exactly she wants to nuke.
Dat neemt de andere dingen nog niet weg.quote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 18:18 schreef Chazr het volgende:
[..]
[..]
http://rt.com/news/tymoshenko-calls-destroy-russia-917/
Goh, raar zeg. Russen vallen haar landje binnen en ze wil terugvechten. Wat een gewelddadige hoer.quote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 17:28 schreef SadPanda het volgende:
Time to grab guns and kill damn Russians – Tymoshenko in leaked tape
http://rt.com/news/tymoshenko-calls-destroy-russia-917/
Fantastisch wijf dus... not.
Er wordt dus ook over gesproken in de plenaire vergadering van de NSS, en niet alleen tijdens de G7. Benieuwd of Lavrov erop reageert.twitter:carlbildt twitterde op maandag 24-03-2014 om 16:54:42Several countries in @NSS2014 discussion bring up Ukraine situation and Russia violating 1994 Budapest memorandum. reageer retweet
twitter:BBCWorld twitterde op maandag 24-03-2014 om 18:27:26Russian and Ukrainian foreign ministers to meet on the sidelines of G7 summit, local media report http://t.co/0OMMyHZL7r reageer retweet
twitter:EuromaidanPR twitterde op maandag 24-03-2014 om 18:30:23Meeting between #Russia's Lavrov& #Ukraine's Deshchytsya happening now http://t.co/stXrCiBPRu @PhilipIttner @ajamlive http://t.co/W9N11LURne reageer retweet
Met ondertitels?quote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 18:38 schreef Ajacied422 het volgende:
Persconferentie met Lavrov begint over enkele ogenblikken
http://hosting.dutchview.nl/20140323-nss/videoiframe.php
Vond je dat ook van het Iraakse verzet tegen de Amerikaanse invasie of lag het toen anders?quote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 18:20 schreef waht het volgende:
[..]
Goh, raar zeg. Russen vallen haar landje binnen en ze wil terugvechten. Wat een gewelddadige hoer.
Ongeveer hetzelfde, niemand ziet zijn land graag binnengevallen worden. Dat was dan ook een domme strategie van Bush en z'n aapjes.quote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 18:41 schreef SadPanda het volgende:
[..]
Vond je dat ook van het Iraakse verzet tegen de Amerikaanse invasie of lag het toen anders?
Kosovo en Afghanistan ook?quote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 18:42 schreef waht het volgende:
[..]
Ongeveer hetzelfde, niemand ziet zijn land graag binnengevallen worden. Dat was dan ook een domme strategie van Bush en z'n aapjes.
quote:Former Putin Adviser: 'Russia Will Not Spare The South And East Of Ukraine'
The Austrian daily Wiener Zeitung has published an illuminating interview about Ukraine and the Kremlin with Andrei Illarionov, a prominent Russian economist who served as Vladimir Putin’s top economic adviser from 2000 to 2005, as well as the Kremlin’s representative to the G-8.
Illarionov’s comments are important, given his direct knowledge of Putin’s Kremlin, and deserve a wide audience. The interview, which includes troubling truths about Russia now, follows in toto.
“Crimea is Only the First Step”
Q: What are Putin’s intentions with regard to Crimea?
A: The Russian Black Sea Fleet has its bases in Sevastopol in Crimea and Vladimir Putin wants to secure them. The Russian president fears that the new Ukrainian government may terminate the basing lease and let NATO use the ports. In addition, he wants to bring the Russian and Russian-speaking population home into his empire.
Q: A majority of the residents of Crimea voted in favor of splitting off from Ukraine.
A: The referendum offered Putin a legal basis to send his troops into Ukraine. Crimea is only the first step. Russia will not spare the South and East of Ukraine. The violent clashes in Kharkiv and Donetsk and the occupation of the local administrations there were arranged by the Kremlin. Putin wants to destabilize Eastern Ukraine and possibly plunge it into a civil war. Then, he could also invade the Eastern regions.
Q: Eastern Ukraine does not want to have anything to do with the interim government in Kyiv, claiming that there are fascists in power there. Is it not understandable that the Eastern Ukrainians want to have a protector?
A: Do you in the West believe the fable about fascists? Putin is only looking for a pretext for a larger military intervention. By the way, I have doubts that the majority of Russians believe the fascist theory.
Q: Opinion polls say that more than sixty percent of Russians would approve of a war over Crimea.
A: Opinion polls in authoritarian states are untrustworthy and do not reflect people’s real views. Public opinion in Russia is the result of propaganda and brainwashing. The best example of this is Russian television with its extremely unbalanced coverage of Ukraine.
Q: In February, Ukraine’s interim government overturned a language act, as a result of which Russian lost its status as official language. Has this not added fuel to the fire?
A: This was certainly a mistake. However, the Russian language in the East and South has never been in jeopardy.
Q: Shouldn’t the Ukrainian government reach out to the Kremlin to defuse the situation?
A: What the Ukrainian government should do above all is show strength, but it fails to do so. Kyiv should have brought Crimea under its control at the very start. Only from a position of strength would Kyiv have had a chance to be heard by the Kremlin. Just imagine: Ukrainian companies continue to deliver defense technology to Russia – knowing full well that Russia could use it against Ukraine.
Q: Was it a mistake that Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons in the 1990s?
A: In the Budapest Memorandum of 1994, the West guaranteed Ukraine’s security provided it gave up its nuclear weapons. Yet now, the West is unable to keep its promise. If Ukraine had nuclear weapons right now, the crisis over Crimea would not have happened.
Q: The West has punished persons close to the Crimean government loyal to Moscow by imposing travel bans. Other sanctions are being considered. Will Putin be impressed by that?
A: No, such sanctions are not effective. They should have been agreed upon months ago. Putin will not be frightened off by travel bans.
Q: Should the West supply arms to Ukraine, as some Republicans in the United States are demanding?
A: Arms supplies are not enough. Putin must be confronted militarily. I do not mean acts of war. But the West should show a military presence in the Black Sea, for example. This is the only way to stop Putin.
Q: Does the West have to fear Putin?
A: Angela Merkel says that Putin has lost touch with reality. This is what it looks like from the viewpoint of a typical European politician, but it’s wrong. Putin does not behave like a normal statesman. The West should see the world with Putin’s eyes and understand his logic.
Q: What is Putin’s logic?
A: He is driven by personal and political power and has unleashed hysteria in Russia about becoming a new empire. This puts global security at risk. He will carry on until he is stopped.
Q: You were Putin’s adviser for a number of years. Why did you quit?
A: When I joined the Presidential team, Russia was halfway free. I wanted to help the country move ahead in economic terms, and I did. After all, Russia made a leap forward and recovered from the chaos of the 1990s. Yet in political terms, Putin ruled Russia in an increasingly authoritarian style. I dropped out after the hostage drama in Beslan. When terrorists seized the school in 2004, I argued to act with caution. Yet Putin attacked the school with tanks. More than 331 people lost their lives in the process.
Q: If you were still on Putin’s team, what would your advice regarding Ukraine be now?
A: Every prudent advisor would advise him to keep his fingers out of Ukraine. Unfortunately, Putin does not listen to advice. He is not willing to listen to anybody.
http://www.businessinside(...)-east-ukraine-2014-3
Poetin is op berenjacht.quote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 18:56 schreef Ajacied422 het volgende:
Volgens Lavrov heeft het niets met Oekraïne te maken dat Poetin afwezig is.
twitter:JuurdEijsvoogel twitterde op maandag 24-03-2014 om 18:56:41Lavrov in DenHaag: g8 is an informal club, nobody can throw out anybody else reageer retweet
Ik verzon maar een jaartal. Waar houdt het op (1950? Middeleeuwen? Jezus?) en waarom wil je perse (gare) vergelijkingen maken (als het je uitkomt)?quote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 19:00 schreef SadPanda het volgende:
[..]
Wat moet je nou weer met Sierra Leone
"Do you in the West believe the fable about fascists? Putin is only looking for a pretext for a larger military intervention. By the way, I have doubts that the majority of Russians believe the fascist theory. "quote:
Het zijn geen gare vergelijkingen. Dezelfde mensen die hier tegen zijn, zijn bijna altijd wel voor de dingen die ik opnoem.quote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 19:02 schreef opgebaarde het volgende:
[..]
Ik verzon maar een jaartal. Waar houdt het op (1950? Middeleeuwen? Jezus?) en waarom wil je perse (gare) vergelijkingen maken (als het je uitkomt)?
Ja en Rusland dacht toen precies het tegenovergestelde van nu en de wereld zag er heel anders uit. Maar laat maar ik laat jou en je topic al me rust. (Vroeger toen ik 5 was piste ik eens in het zwembad, ik zal dat morgen weer doen maar dan van de hoge duikplank)quote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 19:04 schreef SadPanda het volgende:
[..]
Het zijn geen gare vergelijkingen. Dezelfde mensen die hier tegen zijn, zijn bijna altijd wel voor de dingen die ik opnoem.
Geen idee wat je bedoelt maar succes met het pissen.quote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 19:06 schreef opgebaarde het volgende:
[..]
Ja en Rusland dacht toen precies het tegenovergestelde van nu en de wereld zag er heel anders uit. Maar laat maar ik laat jou en je topic al me rust. (Vroeger toen ik 5 was piste ik eens in het zwembad, ik zal dat morgen weer doen maar dan van de hoge duikplank)
Ah, Juliaquote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 17:28 schreef SadPanda het volgende:
Time to grab guns and kill damn Russians – Tymoshenko in leaked tape
http://rt.com/news/tymoshenko-calls-destroy-russia-917/
Wat jij wil aantonen met je "Kosovo en Afghanistan" vraag die je meerdere keren per dag stelt, geldt ook voor Rusland. Misschien moet je per definitie niet dat soort retorische vragen stellen, komen alleen maar antwoorden uit om vooral nooit iets te doen en het is nooit een sterk argumentquote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 19:16 schreef SadPanda het volgende:
[..]
Geen idee wat je bedoelt maar succes met het pissen.
Hoezo geldt dat ook voor Rusland? Of wil je helemaal terug gaan naar voordat de SU viel?quote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 19:20 schreef opgebaarde het volgende:
[..]
Wat jij wil aantonen met je "Kosovo en Afghanistan" vraag die je meerdere keren per dag stelt, geldt ook voor Rusland. Misschien moet je per definitie niet dat soort retorische vragen stellen, komen alleen maar antwoorden uit om vooral nooit iets te doen en het is nooit een sterk argument
De Russische versie hiervan is lachwekkend.quote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 17:34 schreef SadPanda het volgende:
‘Revival of anarchy’: Ukraine radicals rob Russia-Moldova train passengers
http://rt.com/news/anarchy-ukraine-train-robbery-873/
Iemand uit de Poolse regering zou dat voorstel gehad hebben van Rusland. Lijkt me erg onwaarschijnlijkquote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 19:28 schreef SadPanda het volgende:
[ afbeelding ]
Komt er ook nog eens een goed idee uit de mond van Zjirinovski.
quote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 19:24 schreef Nintex het volgende:
[..]
De Russische versie hiervan is lachwekkend.
"We gaan de 8 miljoen Russen in eigen land nuken en dan naar het internationaal gerechtshof in Den Haag" misschien hadden ze de edit eerst nog even moeten naluisteren![]()
Merkel heeft gelijk, Putin en zijn malle KGB-kliek zijn helemaal doorgedraaid.
Wel een goed ideequote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 19:29 schreef DeJori het volgende:
[..]
Iemand uit de Poolse regering zou dat voorstel gehad hebben van Rusland. Lijkt me erg onwaarschijnlijk
Zou wel, hoe noemde poetin het nou, wat historische gerechtigheid zijn voor Polenquote:
http://www.volkskrant.nl/(...)ndse-producten.dhtmlquote:Zjirinovski spuwde zijn gal over Nederland tijdens een fel debat in de Doema, het Russische parlement. 'Hun kaas en tulpen zijn verrot, we moeten ervoor zorgen dat hier geen Heineken-bier meer komt", zei hij. 'n Nederland zijn alleen maar drugsverslaafden, prostituees en seksuele minderheden."
Lijkt me een gezellige kerel om eens een drankje mee te doen.quote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 19:41 schreef SadPanda het volgende:
Leuke praatjes heeft hij altijd wel
[..]
http://www.volkskrant.nl/(...)ndse-producten.dhtml
Als het van Putin en de Russische FSB komt. Zou ook van de SBU kunnen komen, de geheime dienst van Ukraine. Dat Ukraine een nieuwe regering heeft betekent niet dat iedereen in de SBU plots pro-westers is geworden.quote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 19:24 schreef Nintex het volgende:
[..]
De Russische versie hiervan is lachwekkend.
"We gaan de 8 miljoen Russen in eigen land nuken en dan naar het internationaal gerechtshof in Den Haag" misschien hadden ze de edit eerst nog even moeten naluisteren![]()
Merkel heeft gelijk, Putin en zijn malle KGB-kliek zijn helemaal doorgedraaid.
twitter:michaeldweiss twitterde op maandag 24-03-2014 om 18:39:24Putin Falsified Crimean ‘Referendum’ Results, Illarionov Says | The Interpreter http://t.co/g1ApPQXpUZ via @Interpreter_Mag reageer retweet
Ja die heeft ook dit gezegd:quote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 20:05 schreef Frikandelbroodje het volgende:
twitter:michaeldweiss twitterde op maandag 24-03-2014 om 18:39:24Putin Falsified Crimean ‘Referendum’ Results, Illarionov Says | The Interpreter http://t.co/g1ApPQXpUZ via @Interpreter_Mag reageer retweet
Dit inderdaadquote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 18:20 schreef waht het volgende:
[..]
Goh, raar zeg. Russen vallen haar landje binnen en ze wil terugvechten. Wat een gewelddadige hoer.
quote:According to the secretary of the National Security and Defense Andriy Parubiy, Russian Federation still considers invading the continental part of Ukraine. This information was confirmed by Andriy Parubiy himself during the briefing.
Russian forces keep coming to Ukrainian borders and at this moment around 100.000 of armed Russian soldiers are ready to invade the territory of Ukraine even despite all the official claims coming from Kremlin.
“We can say with a firm that the Russian side keeps following its plan, so called “Russian Spring”. They continue working towards destabilizing the situation in the South-Eastern regions,” said Parubiy.
He also mentioned that almost every single day Ukrainian patrols capture diversion groups that are being sent from the Russian side in order to destabilize the situation and capture administrative buildings.
“Only during the past two days in the city of Odessa we managed to capture a diversion group of 4. They were armed with assault rifles and pistols. In Chernihivs’ka oblast’ we captured a citizen of Russian federation who tried to pass the Ukrainian border with the ammo supplies and in Kherson we arrested a suspect who have been collecting information about Ukrainian army forces,” mentioned Parubiy. He also added that today not far from the city of Odessa a group of unknown men attacked the weaponry.
During the whole special operation we also were lucky to capture a couple of Russian leaders who happen to lead radically oriented groups. Their main function was to destabilize the current situation in Eastern regions.
“So, we continue to monitor the ongoing situation in the 8 South-Eastern regions of Ukraine while diversion groups keep coming to Ukraine in order to destabilize the current situation and create a reason for Russian intervention. Right now the biggest danger is coming from the Odess’ka oblast’ that measures with Transnistia.”
In the end of t briefing, the secretary of the National Security and Defense Andriy Parubiy said that Ukrainian soldiers area ready to protect their Motherland.
Maar hij heeft in 2004 ook de verkeerde cijfers over CO2 uitstoot gebruikt om Russisch verzet tegen Kyoto aan te wakkeren, nadat Putin het verdrag reeds getekend had. Een actie die hij waarschijnlijk op z'n eentje deed. Zie Global Warming: Looking Beyond Kyoto - Page 161.quote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 20:11 schreef theNull het volgende:
[..]
Ja die heeft ook dit gezegd:
http://www.globalpost.com(...)ar-Andrei-Illarionov
G7 is klaar, ze druppelen nu binnen bij het diner.twitter:AP twitterde op maandag 24-03-2014 om 20:20:56BREAKING: Diplomat: G-7 to hold June summit in Brussels instead of G-8 meeting in Russia. reageer retweet
Geen idee wat de betrouwbaarheid is uiteraardquote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 20:23 schreef Nintex het volgende:
[..]
100.000 troepen, het waren er eerst 20k, ja dat gaat uit de hand lopen.
Die 20k kwam van "U.S. defense officials", de 100.000 komt van de leider van Svoboda.quote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 20:23 schreef Nintex het volgende:
[..]
100.000 troepen, het waren er eerst 20k, ja dat gaat uit de hand lopen.
dat was donderdag 20 maart, of er sindsdien iets veranderd is?quote:The Russian military presence includes combat troops, heavy armor, attack helicopters, highly trained airborne forces and special-operations troops, the officials said. They stressed that there has been no change in the number or equipment in recent days.
http://www.rawstory.com/r(...)gion-as-next-target/quote:General Philip Breedlove, Natos supreme allied commander, described the Russian force that began exercises 10 days ago as very, very sizeable and very, very ready.
Interessant.quote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 20:11 schreef theNull het volgende:
[..]
Ja die heeft ook dit gezegd:
http://www.globalpost.com(...)ar-Andrei-Illarionov
http://windowoneurasia2.b(...)n-falsified.html?m=1quote:Staunton, March 24 – The majority of residents of Crimea almost certainly did not vote to join the Russian Federation, according to a detailed analysis of that vote by Andrey Illarionov, and Putin’s claimed victory was, as many have suspected, the result of the kind of massive falsification Putin has perpetrated in Russian elections in the past.
Illarionov’s detailed discussion of this issue is convincing, but it is especially important because it calls attention to a trend Putin and his supporters have done everything they can to suppress: support in Crimea for joining the Russian Federation had in fact been declining rather than increasing, a development that may have contributed to the timing of Moscow’s action.
In a blog post over the weekend, Illarionov begins by citing the statement of former Ukrainian Prime Minister Yuliya Timoshenko who said that only 34 percent of Crimean residents voted for joining the Russian Federation, not the 97 percent Vladimir Putin has claimed (echo.msk.ru/blog/aillar/1284798-echo/).
Speaking on “Shuster Live,” Timoshenko said that “according to the data of the leaders of the Crimean Tatar people, only a little more than 34 percent of Crimeans voted for unity with Russia.” That figure, she suggested, is “very close to the truth” (zn.ua/POLITICS/timoshenko-zayavila-chto-za-prisoedinenie-k-rossii-progolosovala-lish-tret-krymchan-141729_.html).
Such figures correspond with the results of polls taken in Crimea in early to mid-February, Illarionov point out. One by the Democratic Initiative found that 35.9 percent of Crimeans favored joining Russia, and a second by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology found a figure of 41.0 percent (dif.org.ua/en/events/ukrainieyu-ne-hochut.htm).
And these in turn replicate the findings of still earlier samplings by the Research and Branding Goup and the Gallup Institute and International Republican Institute, he says (argumentua.com/novosti/vpervye-bolshinstvo-krymchan-khotyat-videt-krym-v-sostave-ukrainy and 112.ua/video/prisoedinenie-kryma-k-rossii-rezultaty-golosovaniya-na-krymskom-kanale-atr.html?type=90106).
Such expressions of public opinion in Crimea not only call into question the results Moscow claimed but suggest that those who currently accept them as somehow valid or at least indicative of a majority in the peninsula need to look more closely at those who have examined Russian falsifications of the vote (kireev.livejournal.com/1005294.html).
“At a minimum,” Illarionov says, “two-thirds of the residents of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea did not vote for joining [it] to present-day Putin’s Russia.” Consequently, the chief ideological prop of the Kremlin on this issue falls apart and means that Putin is relying on naked force alone, something that those concerned about Ukraine and the future should focus on.
More such analyses are likely to appear in the coming days, and one can only hope they will have an impact on thinking in the West as well as in Russia. But already they have called attention to something that Putin has preferred not to talk about and that may explain why he acted when he did even more than references to the Maidan.
Nine months ago, Tatyana Ivzhenko of Moscow’s “Nezavsimaya gazeta” reported that “Russia is losing influence on Crimean residents,” a conclusion she said arose from the findings of new polls there. To the extent that is true, Putin may have felt he had to move when he did lest support for him and for Russia were to fall further (ng.ru/cis/2012-09-14/1_crym.html?print=Y).
Some commentators are likely to insist that the Maidan changed everything, that the Kyiv demonstrations intensified the national feelings of ethnic Russians in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine. There is likely some truth in that, but more recent soundings show that most ethnic Russians even in those regions put Ukrainian citizenship above Russian ethnicity.
Had Putin not played up Russian nationalist sentiment and used it as the basis for an invasion and seizure of Ukrainian territory, Ukraine would likely have been able to integrate its ethnic Russians as full-fledged Ukrainian citizens and would have been a state interested in at least cooperative relations with Moscow.
But Putin’s actions have unified Ukrainians in ways few had thought possible even several weeks ago, and they are likely to remain unified against Moscow in much the same way the victims of Russian aggression on other occasions are. One can only hope that Russians in Ukraine will nonetheless reject Putin’s inversion of ethnicity and citizenship.
http://mobile.nytimes.com(...)aucus&_r=0&referrer=quote:U.S. Intelligence Officials Believe Snowden Is Working With Russia, Lawmaker Says
By BRIAN KNOWLTON
March 23, 2014
WASHINGTON — A top congressional intelligence official said on Sunday that American counterintelligence officials are virtually unanimous in believing that Edward J. Snowden is “under the influence of Russian intelligence services.”
That suggestion came from Representative Mike Rogers, the Michigan Republican who is chairman of the Intelligence Committee.
Mr. Rogers had previously raised the possibility that Mr. Snowden, the former National Security Agency contractor, might be working for Russia, though the congressman has yet to offer any evidence. His assertions on Sunday, however, were his most sweeping to date.
“Every counterintelligence official believes that,” Mr. Rogers said on the NBC News program “Meet the Press.” “You won’t find one that doesn’t believe today he’s under the influence of Russian intelligence services.”
For Mr. Rogers, the question now is when that supposed collaboration began: after Mr. Snowden arrived in Moscow from Hong Kong in late June, or even before then, when he abruptly left Hawaii in May.
“The more we look into this, I think the more you’re going to find that that date gets further and further away from his story,” Mr. Rogers said.
In a Jan. 19 appearance on the same NBC program, Mr. Rogers said that some of Mr. Snowden’s actions in absconding with secret N.S.A. materials were “beyond his technical capabilities.”
But investigators have disclosed no evidence that Mr. Snowden’s work, while under contract to the N.S.A., might have been directed by a foreign power.
Ben Wizner, an American Civil Liberties Union lawyer who advises Mr. Snowden, has vigorously rejected Mr. Rogers’s contentions, noting that Mr. Snowden tried to gain asylum in several other countries before settling in Russia.
There has been no public indication that investigators for the F.B.I., the N.S.A. or the Pentagon have uncovered evidence that Mr. Snowden received assistance from any foreign intelligence service.
http://www.politics.hu/20(...)treason-says-jobbik/quote:Hungary’s approval to EU-Ukraine association agreement “treason”, says Jobbik
Hungary’s recent signing of the association agreement between the European Union and Ukraine equals to giving up Hungary’s national interests, a lawmaker of radical nationalist Jobbik said on Monday calling the ratification an “overt act of treason”.
Istvan Szavay slammed the government for “unconditionally serving the EU” and said that Hungary should have defined preconditions for its support. He added that he thought approving the association agreement was not in Hungary’s interests and suggested that the act was important for the EU in its “geopolitical chess game with Russia over Ukraine”.
Szavay insisted that the government had lied in that “Ukraine’s new language law would ensure the same rights” as the former legislation. It is not true, either, that Transcarpathian Hungarians do not want autonomy, the lawmaker added.
Jobbik insists that there would be a need for Hungarian-Ruthenian autonomy in Transcarpathia, he said.
Ah, ze beginnen de restjes van west Oekraïne al op te delenquote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 21:46 schreef meth1745 het volgende:
[..]
http://www.politics.hu/20(...)treason-says-jobbik/
Geen idee, weet enkel dat het één van de twee (grote) oppositiepartijen is, enquote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 21:56 schreef DeJori het volgende:
[..]
Ah, ze beginnen de restjes van west Oekraïne al op te delen
Niet dat we Jobbik te serieus moeten nemen. Die hebben volgens mij niet veel steun in hun eigen parlement, is het wel?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jobbikquote:Measured according to its representation in the European Parliament and the National Assembly, it is Hungary's third largest party.
quote:
http://www.reuters.com/ar(...)dUSBREA2N10620140324quote:(Reuters) - U.S. President Barack Obama and major industrialized allies warned Russia on Monday it faced damaging economic sanctions if President Vladimir Putin takes further action to destabilize Ukraine following the seizure of Crimea.
Leaders of the Group of Seven, meeting without Russia, agreed to hold their own summit this year instead of attending a planned G8 meeting in the Russian Olympic venue of Sochi, along the Black Sea coast from Crimea, and to suspend their participation in the G8 until Russia changes course.
On a day when Kiev ordered its remaining troops to withdraw from Crimea and Russian forces used force to capture a marine base and a landing ship, leaders of the United States, Germany, France, Britain, Italy, Japan and Canada condemned what they called "Russia's illegal attempt to annex Crimea in contravention of international law".
They also agreed to work together to reduce their dependence on Russian oil and gas.
"We remain ready to intensify actions including coordinated sectoral sanctions that will have an increasingly significant impact on the Russian economy, if Russia continues to escalate this situation," they said in a joint statement.
The G7 leaders, who met on the sidelines of a nuclear security summit in The Hague, said they would meet again in Brussels in early June, the first time since Russia joined the G8 in 1998 that it will have been shut out of the annual summit of industrialized democracies.
Obama, who has imposed tougher sanctions on Moscow than European leaders over its takeover of the strategic peninsula, told reporters: "Europe and America are united in our support of the Ukrainian government and the Ukrainian people".
"We're united in imposing a cost on Russia for its actions so far," he said of the visa bans and asset freezes slapped on senior Russian and Crimean officials.
[..]
Andersom: de VS beloven meer gas te verkopen. De gasexport van de VS is gereguleerd; de overheid moet toestemming geven voor de export van gas.quote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 22:12 schreef meth1745 het volgende:
[..]
[..]
http://www.reuters.com/ar(...)dUSBREA2N10620140324
"work together to reduce their dependence on Russian oil and gas", Europa belooft meer gas en olie van Canada en de VS te kopen?
Daarnaast is er voor de import en export van LNG nogal wat infrastructuur nodig (terminals in havens e.d.). Met dat ene extra terminalletje in Estland wat op de planning staat red je het niet.quote:The Natural Gas Act of 1938, as amended, requires anyone who wants to import or export natural gas, including liquefied natural gas (LNG) from or to a foreign country must first obtain an authorization from the Department of Energy. The Office of Oil and Gas Global Security and Supply, Division of Natural Gas Regulatory Activities is the one-stop-shopping place to obtain these authorizations in the Department. The import/export authorizations are necessary for anyone who wants to import or export natural gas, including LNG.
http://energy.gov/fe/services/natural-gas-regulation
Dat het westen wanhopig is, ze kunnen niks en de wil ontbreekt ook.quote:
EU koopt meer gas van de VS. Wat is het probleem dan?quote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 23:06 schreef vigen98 het volgende:
[..]
Dat het westen wanhopig is, ze kunnen niks en de wil ontbreekt ook.
Ik snap wel waarom Oekraïne zo reageert omdat toch opeens een stuk land niet meer van hun is, maar ze moeten toch wel erkennen dat het niet meer Oekraïne is en dat de bevolking daar voor Rusland koosquote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 23:08 schreef Ambicioso het volgende:
[..]
EU koopt meer gas van de VS. Wat is het probleem dan?
Rusland schaadt het niet volgens jou. Iedereen blij.
Aldus Rusland.quote:Op maandag 24 maart 2014 23:09 schreef vigen98 het volgende:
[..]
Ik snap wel waarom Oekraïne zo reageert omdat toch opeens een stuk land niet meer van hun is, maar ze moeten toch wel erkennen dat het niet meer Oekraïne is en dat de bevolking daar voor Rusland koos
| Forum Opties | |
|---|---|
| Forumhop: | |
| Hop naar: | |