De grote 911 samenzwering ? (komt de waarheid boven) #5

quote:

Universal Admits Defeat, Removes Flight 93 Forum

Universal Studios has admitted defeat in its efforts to re-package the official 9/11 fraud and has completely deleted its own forum after the website was hijacked by individuals posting truthful information about what really happened to Flight 93.

We previously reported that Universal's forum moderators were deleting entire threads in real time deeming them, "inappropriate."

The website had been turned into a battle ground for countering the Flight 93 government apologist propaganda being regurgitated in an impetuous lunge to give credibility to a tale about as reality-based as Humpty Dumpty.

Now a visit to the website only returns the text, "There are no message boards currently available."

The fact that Universal took the decision to remove the entire forum suggests they were concerned that people voicing alternative explanations behind 9/11 and attacking the government version of events was harmful to the reputation of the film, proving again that Flight 93 was produced, in addition to making hundreds of millions of dollars, to negatively reinforce the official 9/11 orthodoxy.

Polls on the website returned results of 80% believing a government cover-up behind 9/11.

[..]

quote:

John: And was United Airlines Flight 93 shot down in Pennsylvania by a U.S. or NATO pilot and was that what was supposed to hit the Pentagon?

DGP: No, that was hit at 10:00 hours. It was taken out by the North Dakota Air Guard. I know the pilot who fired those two missiles to take down 93.

John: Was it shot down because the airline pilots actually regained control of the hijacked auto-pilot or was that to replace the unmanned drone that was shot down?

DGP: No, it was the aircraft, you see, had totally unconscious people on board. There were no hijackers. At 9:35, the Happy Hooligans, the Air Guard flying the F-16s were ordered to take that plane out. And they took it out from 9:35 to 10:00.

John: Were there any refueling jets involved in that operation?

AJ: Hold on a second, John. The question is why would they deviate from the plan of flying it into the Capitol? Why did the globalists decide to go ahead and shoot the plane down?

DGP: There had been an adjustment to the controls, probably by an AWACs aircraft flying overhead, again, remote control. And it was on a course for either the Capitol or the White House. And at this stage, you don't know. The Happy Hooligans came in and took care of it.

AJ: Do you think they were not following orders?

DGP: Who, the Happy Hooligans?

AJ: Well, yeah, you've got Cheney running around, we've got the stand down taking place.

DGP: Well, this is correct, but you see the Adj. General of the State of North Dakota gave the command to take it out. And, by God, they took it out. And I've got the full story in the book.

AJ: That's a good thing they did that. You said you talked to the pilot. Think about this folks. Imagine what Bush would have gotten if he would have had that plane fly into the Capitol? Imagine the police state we would be in right now.

DGP: Yes, yes, yes, indeed.

AJ: And so you had to have the diversionary blast at the Pentagon so no one would get suspicious and think it was a military coup.

DGP: Perhaps, perhaps.

AJ: John, does that answer your question?

John: Was there any refueling tankers used by the North Dakota Air Guard and what tanker wing was used?

DGP: I don't know about the aircraft itself. I don't know about refueling. They came off base in Langley and it was just a few minutes out from Langley to the intercept over Pennsylvania. It was just a matter of minutes.

AJ: Colonel, how did you get in touch with the pilot who shot the plane down?

DGP: It turned out to be an old friend of mine from the Air National Guard and this is my home state of North Dakota. And I attended the ceremony in North Dakota and watched the Adj. General [garbled] the pilot being decorated a year later for this activity that happened on 911 with Flight 93.

BREAK

AJ: Welcome back. We are about to go back to the Colonel and his amazing revelation of the North Dakota National Guard that had been moved to Langley Virginia a few months before 911. And then went in there and shot down that Flight 93 over Pennsylvania. He says he's talked to the pilot. His info checks out. I've been researching what he's been doing for years. Before we go back to our guest and 4 final calls from Scott and June and Warren and Greg, and we'll go to you quick too, because we've got a bunch of news we need to get to.

[Skipped segment]

Colonel, before we take these four final calls, go over that a little bit slower for folks. That's a big deal. You talked to the pilot, a friend of yours, who shot down Flight 93 that was going for the Capitol or the White House. And go over that for folks.

DGP: Okay, quick rundown. They were out of Hector Field, Fargo, North Dakota. A bunch, this 119 Fighter Group and they are called the Happy Hooligans. They are probably the best interceptors that we have in the country. They were moved to Langley Air Force Base from Hector Field down to Southern Virginia. And when the klaxon horn went off at 9:35, those two pilots put down their coffee and shot into their aircraft and took off. They didn't know where they were going initially but by 10:00 hours, they had rendezvoused over Southern Pennsylvania. That's about 250 miles in just a matter of minutes and engaged 93 with two side-winder missiles. And they accomplished their objective. Now Hector Field, I use to fly out of Hector Field some time ago. I know most of those pilots. I could name names. I know the National Guard Adj. General. And they were decorated about a year later and I have the full write up of that story in my book.

AJ: Yeah and it's just ignored by the media. I have that article, too. And later, well okay, it was a missile, well there wasn't "Let's Roll." It's all made-up theatre for the public and we buy it like a bunch of saps.

DGP: That is correct.

quote:

Op donderdag 4 mei 2006 14:28 schreef Boswachtertje het volgende:

[..]

ik ga ook nog wel even zoeken naar meer sites met dezelfde info, het kwam mij als redelijk betrouwbaar over namelijk

quote:

Op donderdag 4 mei 2006 21:35 schreef NorthernStar het volgende:

[..]


Loose Change leunt bijvoorbeeld helemaal op het idee dat er geen Boeing op het Pentagon is ingevlogen. Als blijkt dat er wel een Boeing was dan richt de film enorme schade aan. In een keer de hele geloofwaardigheid van de 'truth movement' kapot.

quote:

Op vrijdag 5 mei 2006 03:10 schreef Sebastral het volgende:

[..]

Waarom zou er geloofwaardigheid verloren gaan als er antwoorden komen? De geloofwaardigheid komt van het voor mogelijk houden dat de overheid zoiets gedaan kan hebben. Dan is uitsluitsel van wel/geen vliegtuig heus geen excuus voor de rest..
Verder ben ik het natuurlijk met je eens

quote:

Op donderdag 4 mei 2006 21:35 schreef NorthernStar het volgende:
Iemand die echt inside info heeft en hier mee naar buiten wil komen gaat eerst een paar maanden interessant doen op verschillende sites en message boards?

quote:

Op vrijdag 5 mei 2006 15:18 schreef Boswachtertje het volgende:

[..]

Ik zou zeggen: oordeel zelf over de text in dit topic
Ik zeg ook niet dat die info de waarheid is, maar het is wel nieuwe informatie! En met toch wel best ver strekkende gevolgen..

ps. hij beweert dat de anthrax brieven van Amerikaanse makelaardij zijn, zie ook de link die ik hierboven heb neergezet

quote:

BBC; ‘For you I feel nothing but disgust,’ said Rosemary Dillard, whose husband Eddie died when a hijacked aircraft slammed into the Pentagon.

‘I hope you sit in that jail without seeing the sky, without seeing the sun… and that your name never comes up in the news again,’ she said.

Moussaoui responded: ‘She [Ms Dillard] said I destroyed a life and she lost a husband. Maybe one day she can think about how many people the CIA has destroyed.’

quote:

Op vrijdag 5 mei 2006 15:18 schreef Boswachtertje het volgende:

[..]

ps. hij beweert dat de anthrax brieven van Amerikaanse makelaardij zijn, zie ook de link die ik hierboven heb neergezet

quote:

Zijn belangrijkste taak was het hervormen van de CIA na een reeks blunders. Zo zag de CIA de aanslagen van 11 september 2001 op New York en Washington niet aankomen. Ook bleek de informatie over Saddam Hoessein en diens vermeende massavernietigingswapens niet te kloppen.
[PZC]

quote:

SIGINT: NSA Director Michael Hayden testified before Congress in October 2002 that the NSA had no indications that Al Qaeda was planning attacks on US soil, let alone against New York or Washington.10 This directly contradicts the fact that in the summer of 2001 the NSA had intercepted communications between the reported tactical mastermind of the attacks, Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, and Mohammed Atta. The NSA did not share the information with any other agencies even at a time when Mohammed was on the FBI's most-wanted terror list. The NSA also failed to translate some messages and later offered the nonsensical excuse that they had no way to separate these calls from millions of others.11

[What do you suppose they were talking about? The best bars in South Florida?]

[LIES A SIXTH GRADER WOULD NOT ACCEPT]

quote:

Only against this backdrop can we properly assess the
threat bin Laden poses. The Saudi militant is unquestionably
going to come at us again. If he can find a weak spot,
which he probably can, he will target us most likely in the
Third World, where his men can maneuver. Then the
Bush administration will have to make a defining decision.
Will President Bush continue the Clinton administration’s
preference for putting terrorist strikes into the FBI’s
investigative hands and, forensic evidence willing, into the
courts, thereby avoiding the diplomatically messy question
of retaliation? Will the administration forcefully complement
the above with another barrage of cruise missiles
aimed at rock huts on the thin hope of catching bin Laden
and his lieutenants unawares?
Deputy secretary of state Richard Armitage recently
warned that the United States would hold the Taliban
responsible for future attacks by Al Qaeda. We can only
hope that this doesn’t mean filing some future court case
in New York City or bouncing the rubble in makeshift
camps in Afghanistan. The Taliban chieftain Mullah
Omar ought to discover that dead Americans mean cruise
missiles coming through his bedroom window and cluster
bombs all over his frontline troops.
The Pentagon’s alarms in the Middle East and the
fecklessness of the administration’s policy toward

quote:

Major New 9/11 Truth Symposium Coming To L.A.

In June 2006 researchers, scholars, journalists, media personalities, and average folks will come together from all over the USA to gather in Los Angeles to invite the rest of the world to examine the facts of 9/11.

Through powerful & insightful presentations from prominent guest speakers & riveting documentary screenings we will examine the Neo-Con Agenda and 9/11 as the pretext for the brutal on-going war in Iraq as well as the establishment's future plans.

This event can be billed as "Two Days Of Truth" and it is a challenge to the establish mouthpiece media that resolutely defends the government fairy tale version of what happened on that fateful day.

The conference will witness the premiere of Alex Jones' newest and most powerful film which largely focuses on the 7/7 London bombings and how the British government ran and exploited the attacks to accelerate big brother's control grid and cashless society.

Jones has been quietly working on this newest documentary for months in his production studio in Austin, Texas keeping even the title under wraps until the premiere at the American Scholars Symposium conference in June 2006.

Noted speakers included on the roster include Dylan Avery, whose Loose Change 2 film has received critical acclaim across the country, causing a mainstream media backlash seeking to debunk the evidence presented in the documentary. See the evidence for yourself and hear the commentary of talented young producer Avery as he counters the elite attack dogs.

This is guaranteed to be unlike any other conference of its kind - the first one ever presented by Alex Jones, a progenitor of the 9/11 Truth Movement who was the first speak out and challenge the government's official story of what happened on 9/11.

Come and experience the biggest ever 9/11 conference - More highly respected speakers than any other, more amazing films than any other, plus special surprise guests. Come to learn, come to share and come to help each other create new strategies to defend the constitution and save the republic from the grip of its greatest enemy.

Participation in this event is not limited to those who are already awake to the truth of 9/11, but is open to all who have questions about the official story. We also invite the mainstream media to join us as fellow truth seekers and face the facts about the events surrounding September 11th, 2001.

quote:

Op donderdag 11 mei 2006 15:55 schreef UncleScorp het volgende:
Ow ja het klinkt idd veel logischer dat het een paar geiteneukers waren ...

quote:

Op donderdag 11 mei 2006 19:43 schreef zhe-devilll het volgende:
http://www.wereldgeheimen.nl/index2.html
moet je deze site eens lezen
je mond gaat open en je ogen los

quote:

Rest van die site is ook 1 grote TRU ellende opsomming

quote:

Op donderdag 11 mei 2006 21:27 schreef Ericr het volgende:

Rest van die site is ook 1 grote TRU ellende opsomming. NWO, Subliminale boodschappen, Illuminati etc etc. Zit nog te zoeken naar artikelen over Chemtrails en reptilians, maar die zullen later nog wel aan bod komen.

quote:

Op donderdag 11 mei 2006 16:13 schreef Ericr het volgende:

[..]

Hoe moeilijk is het nou om de officiele lezing te accepteren?