abonnement Unibet Coolblue Bitvavo
  zondag 19 maart 2006 @ 21:34:22 #51
32622 Elusive
Mad Fer It!!
pi_36181325
oh Oversight
je hebt nog steeds niet iets van je laten horen over http://www.pentagonresearch.com/ ? waarom niet ? wat daar allemaal staat is toch stukken aannemelijker dan die sprookjes die je nu allemaal hier in de topic plakt van vage geocities.com wanadoo.fr en lyocs.com sites

het beste is om gewoon niet meer te posten in dit en de andere 911 topics en ze in een langzame dood laten sterven.

[ Bericht 45% gewijzigd door Elusive op 19-03-2006 21:55:53 ]
pi_36182036
quote:
Op zondag 19 maart 2006 21:24 schreef Oversight het volgende:

dit zijn géén welles/ nietus topics....
Wie bepaalt dan wat er een feit is en wat niet?
Wanneer 2 personen in dit topic objecten in framepjes gaan overtekenen en beiden tot een andere conclusie komen, is dan de conclusie van de ene wel een feit omdat die persoon het topic heeft geopend en de conclusie van de ander geen feit omdat die enkel in het topic post??
Wie bepaalt wat een feit is?
geen
pi_36186595
quote:
Op zondag 19 maart 2006 21:21 schreef Oversight het volgende:

[..]

JANE's,...

we zouden hier toch met FEITEN komen?

[afbeelding]
Ja en ik kom met een feit! En het feit is dat een gobal hawk een lichtgewicht vliegtuig is wat dus absoluut niet door de muur van het pentagon kan vliegen. Da's een FEIT! Nu kom jij aan met plaatje van kruisraket? Oftewel je negeert weer eens een post die je zogenaamde feit met de grond gelijkt maakt en komt weer eens met totaal iets anders aanzetten wat niks te maken heeft met het zogenaamde feit wat jij poste. Durf eens een keertje echt ergens op in te gaan ipv de discussie uit de weg te gaan door over iets heel anders te beginnen. Want het feit dat je een kruisraket nu gaat vergelijken met een global hawk slaat ook weer nergens op, blijkt nog maar eens uit dat je je absoluut niet verdiept in de materie maar alles maar overneemt zolang het maar niet zegt dat het een boeing 757 van United Airlines was.

Of beweer je dat ze een kruisraket in een gobal hawk hebben gestopt, die weer in de kleuren van een UA boeing hebben gespoten, de gobal hawk daarna compleet hebben omgebouwd om de dimensies gelijk te krijgen met die van een 757 (wat niet kan anders klopt je plaatje niet) maar hoe verklaar je anders dat zoveel ooggetuigen een boeing 757 van United Airlines het pentagon in hebben zien vliegen? Verklaar dat eens met onweerlegbare feiten, niet van die halve veronderstellingen of totaal uit hun verband gerukte quotes.
pi_36187607
quote:
Op zondag 19 maart 2006 10:51 schreef Oversight het volgende:
dan bekijken we http://membres.lycos.fr/applemacintosh/pentagon.htm

en daarna http://membres.lycos.fr/applemacintosh2/Pentagon2.htm

Zet iemand even de FEITEN op een rijtje ?
Van die 2de site, kan het het wegschietende brokstuk op plaatje 2 dit zijn:
http://www.pentagonresearch.com/068.html
Gevonden vlak bij de camerapositie.

Brokstuk van plaatje 3 kan dit zijn:
http://www.pentagonresearch.com/074.html

En niet zoals ze onderaan die site beweren, dat zijn namelijk de restanten vna de trailer die voor het pentagon stond.

Maar dit had je ook zelf kunnen doen.
pi_36189417
quote:
Op zondag 19 maart 2006 21:24 schreef Oversight het volgende:

[..]

Zucht, die FEITEN staan hier al 2 dagen....


[afbeelding]
haha, ik ben helemaal overtuigd door dit plaatje

Serieus, ik lig echt in een scheur hier. Je had net zo goed een fucking vliegende drol in dat plaatje kunnen zetten. Je bewijst er echt geen reet mee

Zowieso zit je hier echt iedereen te irriteren, Oversight, met je constante stroom met misinformatie die gewoon @ random van een bagger site haalt.
When dry solid
nitrogen triiodide
is touched, even with a feather, it decomposes rather violently
2 NI3 (s) --> N2 (g) + 3 I2 (s)
pi_36189722
RudeOnline, je theorie is weerlegd
Gerrit Zalm: "Ik woon in Scheveningen en mijn chauffeur in Voorburg. Daarom duurde het even."
pi_36189808
quote:
Op maandag 20 maart 2006 01:04 schreef Stikstof-tri-iodide het volgende:

[..]

haha, ik ben helemaal overtuigd door dit plaatje

Serieus, ik lig echt in een scheur hier. Je had net zo goed een fucking vliegende drol in dat plaatje kunnen zetten. Je bewijst er echt geen reet mee

Zowieso zit je hier echt iedereen te irriteren, Oversight, met je constante stroom met misinformatie die gewoon @ random van een bagger site haalt.


Truth Feedback 19
Gerrit Zalm: "Ik woon in Scheveningen en mijn chauffeur in Voorburg. Daarom duurde het even."
  dinsdag 21 maart 2006 @ 20:57:48 #59
19194 Oversight
◢◤
pi_36244123
FEIT:



[ Bericht 10% gewijzigd door Oversight op 21-03-2006 21:41:42 ]
◢◤
  dinsdag 21 maart 2006 @ 21:02:35 #60
19194 Oversight
◢◤
pi_36244285
FEIT:



FEITEN:

Er wordt maar 1 herkenbaar stuk wrak gevonden.

Dat stuk is direct herleidbaar naar de rechtervoorzijde van een Am Air 757-200.

En ligt dus aan de verkeerde kant van de koers die gevlogen werd op het grasveld.
[/feiten]

Sherlock Holmes zou zich hebben omgedraaid in z'n graf.

Een aan zekerheid grenzend vermoeden kan worden uitgesproken dat ie tot de conclusie zou zijn gekomen dat er geen andere mogelijkheid is,dan dat iemand het er opzettelijk heeft neergelegd.



[ Bericht 38% gewijzigd door Oversight op 22-03-2006 13:56:13 ]
◢◤
pi_36244493
kikkers

[ Bericht 7% gewijzigd door #ANONIEM op 21-03-2006 21:08:28 ]
pi_36244595
En misschien kun je je kikkers van een toelichting voorzien.
  dinsdag 21 maart 2006 @ 21:29:23 #63
19194 Oversight
◢◤
pi_36245515
FEIT:

American Airlines Flight 77 is the plane that is supposed to have hit the Pentagon on September 11th, 2001.

Flight 77, with 58 passengers and a flight crew of four, was a 757-200 on a scheduled flight from Dulles to Los Angeles.
It took off at 8:20 AM, ten minutes after its scheduled departure time.
At 8:46 the plane veered severely off course, a deviation indicated in a USATODAY.com graphic as semicircular loop to the north, ten miles in radius.
Reports indicate communications from the pilots at 8:50, four minutes after the reported deviation.
According to the Boston Globe, the transponder was shut off at 8:56, after which the plane reversed direction and began flying back toward the capital.
With its transponder off, air traffic controllers and NORAD were still able to track the jet using radar.

Flight 77 was een Boeing 757-200



Met een rechtervoorkant...



Waarvan maar 1 deeltje is teruggevonden, op de verkeerde kant van het grasveld zonder zichtbare brand of rookschade...



[ Bericht 1% gewijzigd door Oversight op 21-03-2006 21:46:30 ]
◢◤
pi_36245573
Imageshack kikkers...
niet de vervaarlijke schaduw
met zijn dikke pens vol pistolen
beiden ingevet als een locomotief onder nul
  dinsdag 21 maart 2006 @ 21:43:57 #65
19194 Oversight
◢◤
pi_36246034
quote:
Op dinsdag 21 maart 2006 21:30 schreef LostFormat het volgende:
Imageshack kikkers...
Sorry,... de bovenste twee alvast verzet,.. nu goed ?

◢◤
pi_36246093
FEIT:

De velg van het wiel gevonden in de brokstukken van het pentagon is het wiel van een 757.

Foto van de velg in de brokstukken:



Foto's van velgen van 757's:


http://members.tripod.com/~aravm98/reference/757LGindex.htm
geen
pi_36246106
FEIT:
Het pentagon is 9 jaar geleden versterkt met een speicaal doek wat ontwikkeld was bij ten cate in almelo
quote:
Almelo’s doek redde levens in Pentagon

Almelo - Een supersterk en technologisch hoogwaardig textieldoek uit de fabrieken van Ten Cate Nicolon in Almelo heeft bij de aanslagen op 11 september vorig jaar er mede voor gezorgd dat honderden mensenlevens werden gespaard.
Het speciale textieldoek, Geolon genaamd, werd negen jaar geleden verwerkt in de muren van het Pentagon in Washington. Door die toepassing bleven de muren en vloeren van het Pentagon tot meer dan een half uur na de inslag van het gekaapte vliegtuig hangen. Door deze marge wisten veel medewerkers van het Amerikaanse defensiehoofdkwartier op het nippertje te ontsnappen aan de dood.
http://www.frieschdagblad.nl/artikel.asp?artID=7520
geen
pi_36246112
FEIT:
De brokstukken van de motor (combustion chamber) gevonden in het pentagon puin zijn onderdelen van een RB-211 motor van een boeing 757


Engine debris allegedly from Pentagon, showing combustion chamber housing


Engine compressor or turbine disc


RB-211 overview, combustion chamber housing and high-pressure compressor disc (Source: Boeing maintenance documents)
quote:
The plane debris observed in the various photographs does indeed comport with that of a 757, at least to the limited degree with which they can be compared to actual 757 parts or the manufacturer's detail drawings, as shown above. The engine compressor or turbine disk appears to be approximately the correct diameter to have been used in a Rolls Royce RB211-535E4B engine, as used in American Airlines 757 aircraft. The fragment of the high pressure combustor casing also comports with the string of fuel inlet nozzle holes, the mounting bosses of which have the correct number of screw holes (6). The combustor is definitely not from a Pratt and Whitney PW2037, which is the other make of 757 engine used in the airline industry, nor is it from a General Electric CF6-80C2.
quote:
Some observers have claimed that these engine parts are too small to have come from a 757. The confusion is because the RB-211 engine configuration is dominated by the large turbofan at the front of the engine, which is what people expect a 757 engine should look like. However, because the RB-211 is a "high bypass" engine, the high-pressure compressor, combustion chamber and turbine are all much smaller than the turbofan, as shown in the small overview figure at the top left of the drawing. It is perfectly reasonable to ask what happened to the turbofan -- but the compressor disk and the combustor case do look like 757 parts.
quote:
With regards to the missile theory: The engine parts might comport with the Rolls-Royce turbofan engine in a British Harrier jump-jet, but probably not with a Global Hawk or other missile. The wheel and landing gear parts do not look like they came from a fighter plane or missile. After a diligent search, we have been unable to find any photographs of parts which are clearly from a fighter jet or missile, rather than from a Boeing 757.
http://www.911-strike.com/engines.htm
geen
pi_36246206
FEIT:

Brokstukken van na eencrash van een passagiers in pennsilvania:

Geen brokstukken te zien.

FEIT:
Brokstukken van de crash van flight 93. Geen brokstukken te zien:
geen
  dinsdag 21 maart 2006 @ 21:54:55 #70
19194 Oversight
◢◤
pi_36246437
quote:
Op dinsdag 21 maart 2006 21:46 schreef natte-flamoes het volgende:
FEIT:
De brokstukken van de motor (combustion chamber) gevonden in het pentagon puin zijn onderdelen van een RB-211 motor van een boeing 757

[afbeelding]
Engine debris allegedly from Pentagon, showing combustion chamber housing
WEERLEGD

EXTRA BELANGRIJK FEIT:

Only one engine was found inside the Pentagon. The two images below show two parts of the single engine found in the Pentagon. The left-hand image shows what appears to be part of the rotor element bearing the stubs of vanes. The right-hand image shows what appears to be the compressor (front) stage of the engine encased by its housing. This engine is barely a third the diameter of a large turbofan engine that powers the Boeing 757.




Turbofan Engine used in Boeing 757
The engines used by the Boeing 757 are similar to the Pratt and Whitney engine shown below (PW 2003) and have the same dimensions, being nearly three meters in diameter, more than twice the diameter of the engine shown above.



[ Bericht 2% gewijzigd door Oversight op 21-03-2006 22:02:34 ]
◢◤
pi_36246510
FEIT:
265 mensen vonden de dood bij de 4 vliegtuigcrashes.
quote:
Planes
265 people killed on four planes; 232 passengers, 25 flight attendants, 8 pilots. (Note that this total includes the 19 hijackers, who reportedly boarded the planes as passengers.)

  • American Airlines flight 11 BOS-LAX (north tower of World Trade Center):
    93 people: 82 passengers (including 5 hijackers), 9 flight attendants, 2 pilots

  • United Airlines flight 175 BOS-LAX (south tower of World Trade Center):
    65 people: 56 passengers (including 5 hijackers), 7 flight attendants, 2 pilots

  • American Airlines flight 77 IAD-LAX (The Pentagon):
    64 people: 58 passengers (including 5 hijackers), 4 flight attendants, 2 pilots

  • United Airlines flight 93 EWR-SFO (Pittsburgh):
    44 people: 37 passengers (including 4 hijackers), 5 flight attendants, 2 pilots

    See also: Memorial wiki tributes to the occupants of each plane
  • http://en.wikipedia.org/w(...)_2001_attacks#Planes


    Lijst met namen van de 4 vluchten:
  • American Airlines flight 11
  • United Airlines flight 175
  • Amrican Airlines flight 77
  • United Airlines 93
    http://sep11.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tributes_to_planes
  • geen
    pi_36246608
    quote:
    Op dinsdag 21 maart 2006 21:54 schreef Oversight het volgende:

    [..]

    WEERLEGD

    FEIT:

    Only one engine was found inside the Pentagon. The two images below show two parts of the single engine found in the Pentagon. The left-hand image shows what appears to be part of the rotor element bearing the stubs of vanes. The right-hand image shows what appears to be the compressor (front) stage of the engine encased by its housing. This engine is barely a third the diameter of a large turbofan engine that powers the Boeing 757.
    Lees je wel?
    quote:
    Some observers have claimed that these engine parts are too small to have come from a 757. The confusion is because the RB-211 engine configuration is dominated by the large turbofan at the front of the engine, which is what people expect a 757 engine should look like. However, because the RB-211 is a "high bypass" engine, the high-pressure compressor, combustion chamber and turbine are all much smaller than the turbofan, as shown in the small overview figure at the top left of the drawing. It is perfectly reasonable to ask what happened to the turbofan -- but the compressor disk and the combustor case do look like 757 parts.
    pi_36246614
    FEIT
    Ziad Jarrah zat aan de stuurknuppel van flight 93 vlak voor de crash.
    quote:
    Flight 93 hijacker: 'Shall we finish it off?'
    9/11 report reveals who was at controls before crash
    Friday, July 23, 2004 Posted: 5:57 AM EDT (0957 GMT)


    (CNN) -- Who actually put United Flight 93 into a death dive, causing it to slam into the Pennsylvania countryside on September 11, 2001, is revealed in the 9/11 commission report released Thursday.

    The passenger revolt began at 9:57 a.m., nearly 30 minutes after the four terrorists aboard launched their takeover of the Boeing 757 loaded with more than 11,000 gallons of jet fuel.

    As passengers charged the cockpit door, terrorist hijacker Ziad Jarrah began rolling the plane to the left and right, "attempting to knock the passengers off balance," the 9/11 commission report said. Jarrah told another hijacker in the cockpit to block the door.

    By 9:59 a.m., Jarrah changed tactics and "pitched the nose of the airplane up and down to disrupt the assault."

    "The [flight] recorder captured the sounds of loud thumps, crashes, shouts and breaking glass and plates. At 10:00:03 a.m., Jarrah stabilized the airplane," the report says.

    "Five seconds later, Jarrah asked, 'Is that it? Shall we finish it off?' A hijacker responded, 'No. Not yet. When they all come, we finish it off.' "

    Jarrah resumed pitching the plane up and down.

    "In the cockpit. If we don't, we'll die," a passenger is heard saying.

    "Sixteen seconds later, a passenger yelled, 'Roll it!' " the report says.

    By 10:01 a.m., Jarrah stopped his violent maneuvers and said, "Allah is the greatest! Allah is the greatest!"

    According to the report, he then asked another hijacker in the cockpit, "Is that it? I mean, shall we put it down?"

    "Yes, put it in it, and pull it down," the other responded.

    The passengers continued with their assault, trying to break through the cockpit door. At 10:02 a.m. and 23 seconds, a hijacker said, "Pull it down! Pull it down!"

    "The hijackers remained at the controls but must have judged that the passengers were only seconds from overcoming them," the report concludes.

    "The airplane headed down; the control wheel was turned hard to the right. The airplane rolled onto its back, and one of the hijackers began shouting, 'Allah is the greatest. Allah is the greatest.'

    "With the sounds of the passenger counter-attack continuing, the aircraft plowed into an empty field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, at 580 miles per hour, about 20 minutes' flying time from Washington, D.C."

    Struggle in the cockpit
    The report says Jarrah intended to fly the plane into the White House or the U.S. Capitol. "He was defeated by the alerted, unarmed passengers of United 93," the report says.

    The battle aboard the plane was burned into history by the story of one passenger, Todd Beamer, who used an onboard phone to call the FBI. At the end of his call, the operator overhead him say to other passengers, "Let's roll."

    He and other passengers had learned of the attacks in New York and Washington after placing calls to loved ones.

    In the weeks and months after the attacks, there were reports that officials believed passengers had overtaken the plane, forcing it to crash in the field in Pennsylvania. However, last year, officials began backing away from that theory.

    Thursday's report gives no indication that passengers ever broke through the cockpit door, but it makes clear that passengers' actions thwarted the plans of the terrorists.

    The report also gives harrowing details of the moments just before and after the plane was hijacked.

    The plane, which had left Newark, New Jersey, for Los Angeles, California, at 8:42 a.m. carrying 37 passengers and seven crew members, received a warning from United flight dispatcher Ed Ballinger at 9:24 a.m.: "Beware any cockpit intrusion -- two a/c [aircraft] hit World Trade Center."

    The message was sent by Ballinger to several aircraft to alert them of potential terrorists.

    Two minutes later, at 9:26 a.m., pilot Jason Dahl appeared to be puzzled by the message and responded, "Ed, confirm latest mssg plz -- Jason."

    "The hijackers attacked at 9:28," the report says. "While traveling 35,000 feet above eastern Ohio, United 93 suddenly dropped 700 feet. Eleven seconds into the descent, the FAA's air traffic control center in Cleveland received the first of two radio transmissions from the aircraft.

    "During the first broadcast, the captain or first officer could be heard declaring 'Mayday' amid the sounds of a physical struggle in the cockpit. The second transmission, 35 seconds later, indicated that the fight was continuing. The captain or first officer could be heard shouting: 'Hey get out of here -- get out of here -- get out of here.' "

    At 9:32 a.m., the report says, a hijacker "made or attempted to make the following announcement to the passengers of Flight 93: 'Ladies and gentlemen: Here the captain, please sit down keep remaining sitting. We have a bomb on board. So, sit.' "

    The report also says a woman, most likely a flight attendant, was being held captive in the cockpit. "She struggled with one of the hijackers who killed or otherwise silenced her," it says.

    The report says at least 10 passengers and two crew members contacted family, friends or others on the ground. They reported the hijackers were wearing red bandanas, forced passengers to the back of the plane and claimed a bomb was aboard, according to the report.

    Flight 93 was the only hijacked plane that day with four hijackers aboard. All other flights had five hijackers.

    The report says a man who was denied entry and detained in Florida a month before the attacks possibly was supposed to have been the fifth hijacker aboard Flight 93.

    "The operative likely intended to round out the team for this flight, Mohamed al Kahtani, had been refused entry by a suspicious immigration inspector at Florida's Orlando International Airport in August," the report says.

    Al Kahtani is currently being held at the detainee center at the U.S. naval base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
    http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/07/22/911.flight.93/
    geen
    pi_36246723
    FEIT:
    getuigen verklaren een passagiersvliegtuig gezien te hebben:


  • "USAToday.com Editor Joel Sucherman saw it all: an American Airlines jetliner fly left to right across his field of vision as he commuted to work Tuesday morning. It was highly unusual. The large plane was 20 feet off the ground and a mere 50 to 75 yards from his windshield. Two seconds later and before he could see if the landing gear was down or any of the horror-struck faces inside, the plane slammed into the west wall of the Pentagon 100 yards away. 'My first thought was he's not going to make it across the river to [Reagan] National Airport. But whoever was flying the plane made no attempt to change direction,' Sucherman said. 'It was coming in at a high rate of speed, but not at a steep angle—almost like a heat-seeking missile was locked onto its target and staying dead on course.'"
    - "Journalist Witnesses Pentagon Crash." eWeek.com, 13 Sep 2001

  • A pilot who saw the impact, Tim Timmerman, said it had been an American Airways 757. "'It added power on its way in,' he said. 'The nose hit, and the wings came forward and it went up in a fireball.'"
    - "Pentagon Eyewitness Accounts." The Guardian, 12 Sep 2001

  • Traffic is normally slow right around the Pentagon as the road winds and we line up to cross the 14th Street bridge heading into the District of Columbia. I don’t know what made me look up, but I did and I saw a very low-flying American Airlines plane that seemed to be accelerating. My first thought was just 'No, no, no, no,' because it was obvious the plane was not heading to nearby Reagan National Airport. It was going to crash."
    - "September 11 Remembered." University Week, 4 Oct 2001

  • Father Stephen McGraw was driving to a graveside service at Arlington National Cemetery the morning of Sept. 11, when he mistakenly took the Pentagon exit onto Washington Boulevard, putting him in a position to witness American Airlines Flight 77 crash into the Pentagon. 'I was in the left hand lane with my windows closed. I did not hear anything at all until the plane was just right above our cars.' McGraw estimates that the plane passed about 20 feet over his car, as he waited in the left hand lane of the road, on the side closest to the Pentagon. 'The plane clipped the top of a light pole just before it got to us, injuring a taxi driver, whose taxi was just a few feet away from my car. I saw it crash into the building,' he said. 'My only memories really were that it looked like a plane coming in for a landing. I mean in the sense that it was controlled and sort of straight. That was my impression,' he said. 'There was an explosion and a loud noise and I felt the impact. I remember seeing a fireball come out of two windows (of the Pentagon). I saw an explosion of fire billowing through those two windows.'"
    - "Pentagon Crash Eyewitness Comforted Victims." MDW News Service, 28 Sep 2001

  • "On a Metro train to National Airport, Allen Cleveland looked out the window to see a jet heading down toward the Pentagon. 'I thought, "There's no landing strip on that side of the subway tracks,"' he said. Before he could process that thought, he saw 'a huge mushroom cloud. The lady next to me was in absolute hysterics.'"
    - "Our Plane Is Being Hijacked." Washington Post, 12 Sep 2001


  • "I was supposed to have been going to the Pentagon Tuesday morning at about 11:00am (EDT) and was getting ready, and thank goodness I wasn't going to be going until later. It was so shocking, I was listening to the news on what had happened in New York, and just happened to look out the window because I heard a low flying plane and then I saw it hit the Pentagon. It happened so fast... it was in the air one moment and in the building the next..."
    - "U.S. Under Attack: Your Eyewitness Accounts." BBC News, 14 Sep 2001


  • "As I approached the Pentagon, which was still not quite in view, listening on the radio to the first reports about the World Trade Center disaster in New York, a jetliner, apparently at full throttle and not more than a couple of hundred yards above the ground, screamed overhead. ... Seconds before the Pentagon came into view a huge black cloud of smoke rose above the road ahead. I came around the bend and there was the Pentagon billowing smoke, flames and debris, blackened on one side and with a gaping hole where the airplane had hit it."
    - "Eyewitness at the Pentagon." Human Events, 17 Sep 2001


  • "Frank Probst, an information management specialist for the Pentagon Renovation Program, left his office trailer near the Pentagon's south parking lot at 9:36 a.m. Sept. 11. Walking north beside Route 27, he suddenly saw a commercial airliner crest the hilltop Navy Annex. American Airlines Flight 77 reached him so fast and flew so low that Probst dropped to the ground, fearing he'd lose his head to its right engine."
    - "A Defiant Recovery." The Retired Officer Magazine, January 2002


  • "USAToday.com Editor Joel Sucherman saw it all: an American Airlines jetliner fly left to right across his field of vision as he commuted to work Tuesday morning. It was highly unusual. The large plane was 20 feet off the ground and a mere 50 to 75 yards from his windshield. Two seconds later and before he could see if the landing gear was down or any of the horror-struck faces inside, the plane slammed into the west wall of the Pentagon 100 yards away. 'My first thought was he's not going to make it across the river to [Reagan] National Airport. But whoever was flying the plane made no attempt to change direction,' Sucherman said. 'It was coming in at a high rate of speed, but not at a steep angle—almost like a heat-seeking missile was locked onto its target and staying dead on course.'"
    - "Journalist Witnesses Pentagon Crash." eWeek.com, 13 Sep 2001


  • "'I mean it was like a cruise missile with wings, went right there and slammed into the Pentagon,' eyewitness Mike Walter said of the plane that hit the military complex. 'Huge explosion, great ball of fire, smoke started billowing out, and then it was just chaos on the highway as people either tried to move around the traffic and go down either forward or backwards,' he said."
    - "Witnesses and Leaders on Terrorist Attacks." CNN, 11 Sep 2001


  • "'(The plane) was flying fast and low and the Pentagon was the obvious target,' said Fred Gaskins, who was driving to his job as a national editor at USA Today near the Pentagon when the plane passed about 150 feet overhead. 'It was flying very smoothly and calmly, without any hint that anything was wrong.'"
    - "Bush Vows Retaliation for 'Evil Acts'." USA Today, 11 Sep 2001


  • "Aydan Kizildrgli, an English language student who is a native of Turkey, saw the jetliner bank slightly then strike a western wall of the huge five-sided building that is the headquarters of the nation's military. 'There was a big boom,' he said. 'Everybody was in shock. I turned around to the car behind me and yelled "Did you see that?" Nobody could believe it.'"
    - "Bush Vows Retaliation for 'Evil Acts'." USA Today, 11 Sep 2001


  • "'I saw the tail of a large airliner. ... It plowed right into the Pentagon," said an Associated Press Radio reporter who witnessed the crash. 'There is billowing black smoke.'"
    - "America's Morning of Terror." ChannelOne.com, 2001


  • "Omar Campo, a Salvadorean, was cutting the grass on the other side of the road when the plane flew over his head. 'It was a passenger plane. I think an American Airways plane,' Mr Campo said. 'I was cutting the grass and it came in screaming over my head. I felt the impact. The whole ground shook and the whole area was full of fire. I could never imagine I would see anything like that here.'"
    - "Pentagon Eyewitness Accounts." The Guardian, 12 Sep 2001


  • "Afework Hagos, a computer programmer, was on his way to work but stuck in a traffic jam near the Pentagon when the plane flew over. 'There was a huge screaming noise and I got out of the car as the plane came over. Everybody was running away in different directions. It was tilting its wings up and down like it was trying to balance. It hit some lampposts on the way in.'"
    - "Pentagon Eyewitness Accounts." The Guardian, 12 Sep 2001


  • "A pilot who saw the impact, Tim Timmerman, said it had been an American Airways 757. "'It added power on its way in,' he said. 'The nose hit, and the wings came forward and it went up in a fireball.'"
    - "Pentagon Eyewitness Accounts." The Guardian, 12 Sep 2001


  • "Steve Eiden, a truck driver, had picked up his cargo that Tuesday morning in Williamsburg, Va., and was en route to New York City and witnessed the aftermath. ... He took the Highway 95 loop in the area of the Pentagon and thought it odd to see a plane in restricted airspace, thinking to himself it was odd that it was flying so low. 'You could almost see the people in the windows,' he said as he watched the plane disappear behind a line of trees, followed by a tall plume of black smoke. Then he saw the Pentagon on fire, and an announcement came over the radio that the Pentagon had been hit."
    - "Sept. 11, the Day America Changed." The Baxter Bulletin, 2001


  • "Traffic is normally slow right around the Pentagon as the road winds and we line up to cross the 14th Street bridge heading into the District of Columbia. I don’t know what made me look up, but I did and I saw a very low-flying American Airlines plane that seemed to be accelerating. My first thought was just 'No, no, no, no,' because it was obvious the plane was not heading to nearby Reagan National Airport. It was going to crash."
    - "September 11 Remembered." University Week, 4 Oct 2001


  • "Father Stephen McGraw was driving to a graveside service at Arlington National Cemetery the morning of Sept. 11, when he mistakenly took the Pentagon exit onto Washington Boulevard, putting him in a position to witness American Airlines Flight 77 crash into the Pentagon. 'I was in the left hand lane with my windows closed. I did not hear anything at all until the plane was just right above our cars.' McGraw estimates that the plane passed about 20 feet over his car, as he waited in the left hand lane of the road, on the side closest to the Pentagon. 'The plane clipped the top of a light pole just before it got to us, injuring a taxi driver, whose taxi was just a few feet away from my car. I saw it crash into the building,' he said. 'My only memories really were that it looked like a plane coming in for a landing. I mean in the sense that it was controlled and sort of straight. That was my impression,' he said. 'There was an explosion and a loud noise and I felt the impact. I remember seeing a fireball come out of two windows (of the Pentagon). I saw an explosion of fire billowing through those two windows.'"
    - "Pentagon Crash Eyewitness Comforted Victims." MDW News Service, 28 Sep 2001


  • "'I glanced up just at the point where the plane was going into the building,' said Carla Thompson, who works in an Arlington, Va., office building about 1,000 yards from the crash. 'I saw an indentation in the building and then it was just blown-up up—red, everything red,' she said. 'Everybody was just starting to go crazy. I was petrified.'"
    - "Terrorists Attack New York, Pentagon." Los Angeles Times, 12 Sep 2001


  • "I witnessed the jet hit the Pentagon on September 11. From my office on the 19th floor of the USA TODAY building in Arlington, Va., I have a view of Arlington Cemetery, Crystal City, the Pentagon, National Airport and the Potomac River. ... Shortly after watching the second tragedy, I heard jet engines pass our building, which, being so close to the airport is very common. But I thought the airport was closed. I figured it was a plane coming in for landing. A few moments later, as I was looking down at my desk, the plane caught my eye. It didn't register at first. I thought to myself that I couldn't believe the pilot was flying so low. Then it dawned on me what was about to happen. I watched in horror as the plane flew at treetop level, banked slightly to the left, drug it's wing along the ground and slammed into the west wall of the Pentagon exploding into a giant orange fireball. Then black smoke. Then white smoke."
    - Steve Anderson, Director of Communications, USA Today

    http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/blflight77w.htm
  • geen
    pi_36246766
    quote:
    Op dinsdag 21 maart 2006 21:54 schreef Oversight het volgende:

    [..]

    WEERLEGD

    EXTRA BELANGRIJK FEIT:

    Only one engine was found inside the Pentagon. The two images below show two parts of the single engine found in the Pentagon. The left-hand image shows what appears to be part of the rotor element bearing the stubs of vanes. The right-hand image shows what appears to be the compressor (front) stage of the engine encased by its housing. This engine is barely a third the diameter of a large turbofan engine that powers the Boeing 757.

    [afbeelding][afbeelding]


    Turbofan Engine used in Boeing 757
    The engines used by the Boeing 757 are similar to the Pratt and Whitney engine shown below (PW 2003) and have the same dimensions, being nearly three meters in diameter, more than twice the diameter of the engine shown above.

    [afbeelding]
    Kijk even op het schema. De binnenkant van een motor is een stuk kleiner dan de buitenkant.
    geen
    abonnement Unibet Coolblue Bitvavo
    Forum Opties
    Forumhop:
    Hop naar:
    (afkorting, bv 'KLB')