Chemtrails - clouds of death - DivX documentaire.

Die laatste vraag van je, had je allang beantwoord kunnen hebben als jij enkele sites had doorgenomen. Dat je überhaupt zo een vraag stelt, geeft, nogmaals, alleen maar aan hoe weinig je eigenlijk op de hoogte bent van de informatie die er is. Dat gaf je opmerking over verspreiding via drinkwater ook al aan.

Verder met informeren.
Een video, lichtelijk komisch, maar toch ook wel weer veelzeggend:
http://www.chem-trails.org/20020426a.mpg rond de 40 Mb

quote:

Op vrijdag 4 november 2005 15:32 schreef Metro2005 het volgende:

( Ik heb nu 1 deel gezien van die william thomas en het enige waar die mee kwam als 'bewijs' was dat de strepen te dicht op elkaar stonden )

Dan ben ik bang dat je kennis van de Engelse taal nog niet optimaal is.

quote:

Op vrijdag 4 november 2005 15:34 schreef WWSK het volgende:
Die laatste vraag van je, had je allang beantwoord kunnen hebben als jij enkele sites had doorgenomen. Dat je überhaupt zo een vraag stelt, geeft, nogmaals, alleen maar aan hoe weinig je eigenlijk op de hoogte bent van de informatie die er is. Dat gaf je opmerking over verspreiding via drinkwater ook al aan.

Verder met informeren.
Een video, lichtelijk komisch, maar toch ook wel weer veelzeggend:
http://www.chem-trails.org/20020426a.mpg rond de 40 Mb

Nou sorry maar het enige wat ik als 'reden' vind is dat ze mensen willen vergiftigen en ziek maken.
en als dat je doel is dan doe je dat niet door chemtrails te spuiten maar door de drinkwatervoorziening te besmetten of door een kernbom op een stad te gooien. Okee, die laatste optie is wat minder subtiel maar wel erg effectief

Joh, is dat het enige wat jij als reden vind? Dan weet ik niet op wat voor sites jij komt, maar op heel andere sites dan ik. Geef mij de sites maar door die dat als reden geven.

Verder met informeren (over iets wat volgens jouw natuurkundelessen onmogelijk is, lol):

Former Naval Physicist: Government Can Control Hurricanes
Former Vet "Made it Rain" During Vietnam War

Steve Watson & Paul Joseph Watson | 14 Oct 2005

Alex Jones was joined on air yesterday by weather modification expert Ben Livingston.

Livingston discussed in detail proven evidence of hurricane control and his research and experiences with cloud seeding and weather weapons used in the Vietnam war.



Many scoff at the possibility of weather control and simply refuse to believe it exists. Attempting to even engage such people in conversation on the subject is fruitless because their mind is set. Yet the reality is that weather modification has been in operation and continual development since the 1960s.

Livingston, now 77, has a master's degree in cloud physics from the Naval Weapons Center and Navy Post Graduate School in California, a degree he later used in the battlefields.

According to a recent report "He seeded clouds and dramatically increased rainfall in his theater of war, creating impassably muddy roads, slowing down the Vietnamese and Korean troops, and saving lives and entire towns from occupation."

Livingston was even invited to the White House where he briefed President Lyndon B. Johnson on the effectiveness of weather control activities. Livingston asserts that hurricane control was a national priority of the government in the 60s and they had the ability to do it at that time. That was 40 years ago.

He now works with scientists and pilots at Weather Modification Inc., in Fargo, N.D. His research of hurricane control has been confirmed by the Stanford Research Institute.

He has personally flown on 265 missions into the eyes of hurricanes and has gone on record as "most disgusted" with Hurricane Katrina because he knows that the storm itself could have been minimized.

Livingston revealed that to reduce or redirect a category 4 hurricane would not be that difficult:

"A hurricane is made up of energy sails and each of those sails adds to the ferocity of it. It was proven in 1974 by an international project that these energy sails exist and that they are the reason that hurricanes can develop and grow move and cause damages. So there's no reason to attack the hurricane in total but just to fly in to the right front quadrant primarily relative to the direction the storm is moving in and seed those energy sails that are converging and making the rain and wind velocity increase in the front part of a hurricane." Livingston asserted.

He went on to explain exactly how to minimize and control the hurricane:

" We would be trying to destroy or at least grossly reduce the velocity in these individual energy sails by seeding the clouds with silver iodide in the top part of the cloud... and those tops would then have so many small droplets in them that the prevailing wind just blows them away and so an energy sail would be neutralized until it can regroup which may be several hours later."



The seeding process may sound complicated but it is not at all. There would be no need for more than two small aircraft at a time to safely fly upwards into the hurricane.

"We're carrying more cloud seeding material on one airplane now, over 800% more on each plane than we had during Project Storm Fury" (The project set up by the US Government to discover how to control hurricanes in the 60s). Livingston added.

Alex put the question to Livingston, if it is so simple to do and the government knows how to do it and has been doing it since the 60s then why did they not attempt to minimize hurricane Katrina?

"This is a long story with a deep history. Back in the mid 50s, 1954 or so, the government allotted the first amount of money for weather modification and weather control practices to the US weather Bureau to the tune of about 30 million dollars." Livingston said.

"Their charge was to employ the most brilliant scientists around the world, and meteorologists and physicists, to work out a concept for reducing damages from hurricanes. What brought that on was that we had three tremendous hurricanes in 1953 and '54 that affected the twelve northeastern states... Basically The National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) was formed to take that responsibility." He went on to say.

Mr Livingston went on to describe how Project "Storm Fury" of which he was a national director was then set up in the mid 60s. Much of the research was carried out on hurricanes in the Atlantic at that time.

Project Storm Fury was shut down on the logic that the data was not good enough to use in statistical studies. Many believe that the research then became part of a black operation on weather modification.

Upon recently writing to verify what the national policy is on hurricane research, Livingston received the following response:

"The approach of NOAA with regard to minimizing the impact of hurricanes on US citizens is to improve our forecast on the tracking and intensity of storms and to better warn those in harm's way. It is no longer the policy of NOAA to support or conduct weather modification research."

So there is effectively no official government budget for weather modification of any kind. This would not however prevent the hiring of private companies such as Weather Modification, Inc. to carry out the relatively simple work for around $25 million for the hurricane season. This is a small amount when considering the billions spent on rebuilding and clearing up after hurricanes.

"The situation is as I see it that the Federal Government and NOAA have a tremendous job to do and they're doing a tremendous job. But their interest is in statistical data...where as people who are concerned about hurricane damages are interested more in results or empirical data." Livingston added.

Dr Livingston went on to read a statement from the Stanford research Institute who were brought into Project Storm Fury in the late sixties as a third party, which stated conclusively that knowledge of how to stop hurricanes had been uncovered and that they would be directly liable should a hurricane hit and cause extensive damage and loss of life.

Livingston revealed that on the 18th August 1969, five seedings at two hour intervals on Hurricane Debbie, researchers deduced that the wind speed had decreased from 115mph to 80 mph. That is a 30% reduction and a 45% reduction in damages. On August 20th a second seeding decreased the wind speed again to just under 100 mph, a reduction of around 15%. Some scientists involved wanted more research and to uncover clearer patterns so they brought in Stanford as a third party, who determined that more seeding should be done for damage reduction.

Of course, during the Vietnam war the goal for Livingston and his colleagues was to actually strengthen adverse weather, to inflate and exacerbate the monsoon season in order that the Vietnamese get bogged down. So not only is prevention possible, but also creation of harsh weather conditions.

Dr Livingston was assigned in 1966 from the Naval weapons research Laboratory to a marine fighter squadron in Vietnam. Instead of guns, the aircraft under Livingston's control were fitted with cloud seeding equipment.

"My mission was to find clouds and seed them for maximum precipitation value" he commented.

Cloud seeding is the process of spreading either dry ice (or more commonly, silver iodide aerosols) into the upper part of clouds to try to stimulate the precipitation process and form rain. Since most rainfall starts through the growth of ice crystals from super-cooled cloud droplets (droplets colder than the freezing point, 32 deg. F) in the upper parts of clouds, the silver iodide particles are meant to encourage the growth of new ice particles.



Alex went on to ask Dr Livingston whether it was dangerous flying into hurricanes, and whether that was a factor that could have prevented operations going ahead.

"A good part of the time you're out in the most beautiful VFR weather you've ever seen. If it's night you can see the stars, the moon, if it's daytime the sun or whatever. So you can not only see what you're going to seed, you can analyze it on your radar... generally speaking its not very hazardous flying." Livingston answered.

Dr Livingston puts beyond doubt the reality of weather modification. His take on Hurricane Katrina is that it was not prevented for political reasons.

|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

Even before the 1960s

1947: Wilhelm Reich handed the US Government a weather control device, a device that would do DOR-busting. DOR = Deadly Orgone Energy. Reich thought that if he could decrease the amount of DOR that storms would not be so violent. (DOR is the result of orgone energy coming into contact with an enclosed radioactive source). The government sent the device up into a storm and it did reduce the intensity of the storm. They worked.

The Montauk Project was a combination of Wilhelm Reich's work and the Philadelphia Experiment. There were two separate projects going on in Phoenix One. You had the invisibility aspect and you had the development of Wilhelm Reich's weather control. Toward the end of the Phoenix project, by using some of Wilhelm Reich's concepts and some of the transmission schemes used from the "radiosonde" project, they found that you could combine the two factors and use them for 'Mind Control'.

1952: W.O. Schumman identifies 7.83 Hertz the resonant frequency of the Earth (now known as the Schumann Resonances).

1958: Van Allen radiation belts are discovered (zones of charged particles trapped in earth's magnetic field) 2,000+ miles up.

1958: Named Project Argus, the U.S. Navy explodes three nuclear bombs inside Van Allen belt.

1958: White House advisor on weather modification says Defense Department studying ways to manipulate charges of 'earth and sky, and so affect the weather'. [Did you know that such a department as "Weather Modification" existed in the White House way back in 1952? The mere existence of such an office strongly implies the technology to modify and control the weather existed.]

1960: A series of weather disasters begin.

1961: Scientists propose artificial ion cloud experiments. In 1960's the dumping of chemicals (barium powder, etc.) from satellites and rockets began.

1961-62: U.S.S.R. and U.S.A. create many electromagnetic pulses (EMPs) in the atmosphere. 300 megatons of nuclear devices deplete ozone layer by about 4%. [Hmm, ozone layer depletion was intentionally created by both Russian and American governments by nuclear detonations? They not only knew about it, they measured the extent of the depletion and the time it lasted. Therefore, do you think it just might be possible that, once again, we have the situation where a dire prediction is made, with the knowledge that their scientists can actually make it happen?]

1962: Launch of Canadian satellites and start of stimulating plasma resonances by antennas within the space plasma.

1966: Gordon J.F. MacDonald publishes military ideas on environmental engineering.

1960's: In Wisconsin, U.S. Navy Project Sanguine lays extremely low frequency (ELF) antennae. [We are told that the Navy needed this ELF capability to communicate with their submarines in a way that would be secure from enemy attack, a claim with which we do not argue. However, it is also possible that this ELF antennae may serve a dual purpose, of also helping to control the weather]

1968: Moscow scientists tell the West that they have pinpointed which pulsed magnetic field frequencies help mental and physiological functions and which frequencies do harm. [This little incident shows the unusual cooperation between Russia and America at the height of the Cold War. Such cooperation constitutes proof of the claim that Russia has cooperated with the Western Powers since the beginning, in 1917.

1972: First reports on 'ionospheric heater' experiments with high frequency radio waves at Arecibo (Alaska). A 100 megawatt heater in Norway built later in the decade can change the conductivity of the auroral ionosphere. [Now, they were getting close to being able to control the weather. When you can manipulate the conductivity of the auroal ionosphere, where weather systems operate and originate, you are close to controlling the weather. Note the date here, at which time this technology was realized: 1972].

1973: Documentation that the launch of Skylab 'halved the total electron content of the ionosphere for three hours' (by rocket exhaust gases).

1974: United Nations General Assembly bans environmental warfare. [You do not need a treaty banning Weather Warfare unless such technology already exists and has been proven effective. This means that this Weather Warfare technology has been fine tuned for at least 30 years].

1974: High frequency experiments at Plattsville (Colorado), Arecibo (Alaska), Puerto Rico, and in Armidale, New South Wales. These experiments heated the bottom side of the ionosphere.

1974: Experiments - airglow brightened by hitting oxygen atoms in ionosphere with accelerated electrons.

1975: Stanford professor Robert Helliwell reports that very low frequency (VLF) from power lines is altering the ionosphere.

1975: U.S. Senator Gaylord Nelson forces the Navy to release research showing that extremely low frequency (ELF) transmissions can altar human blood chemistry. [Once again, this technology begins to hit very close to home. When an enemy can altar your blood chemistry just by aiming ELF transmissions, we can be destroyed with no knowledge of what is happening to us, or who is doing such lethal damage. Can you also sense the possibilty of control of an entire population, without the people ever being aware they are being manipulated?]

1975: U.S. Senator Pell's Senate Subcommittee, urges that weather and climate modification work should be overseen by a civilian agency answerable to the U.S. Congress. This never happened. [Senator Pell urged the United States to sign tes United Nations treaty banning Weather Warfare. It sounds like Pell was very concerned about the use and misuse of this technology].

1975: Soviets begin pulsing 'Woodpecker' extremely low frequency (ELF) waves at key brainwave rhythms. Eugene (Oregon) was one of the locations where Woodpecker was aimed, and where people were particularly affected. [Once, again, it is a shock to discover that an enemy can destroy us either biologically or mentally from a distance, without any of us being aware of it].

1976: Drs. Susan Bawin and W. Ross Adey demonstrate that human nerve cells are affected by ELF fields.

1979: The launch of NASA's third High-Energy Astrophysical Observatory causes large scale, artificially induced depletion in the ionosphere. The plasma hole was caused by 'rapid chemical processes' between rocket exhaust and the ozone layer. The ionosphere was significantly depleted over a horizontal distance of 300 km for some hours.

1985: Bernard J. Eastlund applies for the patent, "Method and Apparatus for Altering a Region in the Earth's Atmosphere, Ionosphere and/or Magnetosphere". [This is the first of three Eastlund patents assigned to ARCO Power Technologies, Inc.]

1986: The U.S. Navy's Project Henhouse duplicates the Delgado (Madrid) experiment - very low level, very low frequency pulsed magnetic fields harm chick embryos.

Late 1980's: In the latter part of the decade, the U.S. begins a network of Ground Wave Emergency Network (GWEN) towers, each to generate Very Low Frequency (VLF) waves. [GWEN towers created a high level electromagnetic (EM) dam in the atmosphere in the American Midwest that created rain for 40 days and nights in 1993. GWEN towers were located right where the rain came down. GWEN towers are also located along the San Andreas fault in California and Nevada where all the earthquakes of the past 3 decades have been occurring].

Late 1980's: Other ARCO Power Technologies Incorporated (APTI) scientists build upon the Eastlund patents for development of new weapon capabilities.

1994: Military contractor E-systems buys APTI, holder of the Eastlund patents, and contracts to build the biggest ionospheric heater in the world: the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Project (HAARP). [Even though construction of HAARP towers in Alaska began before this date, this was the time the decision was made to make it as large as it is now today, with over 40 acres of ELF towers].

1994: Congress freezes the funding on HAARP until planners increase the emphasis on earth penetrating tomography uses, for nuclear counter proliferation efforts.

1995: Congress budgets $10 million for 1996 under "nuclear counterproliferation" efforts for HAARP project. [This confirms that the U.S. Government is in firm control of HAARP].

1994-96: Testing of first stage of HAARP equipment continues.

1996: HAARP planners test the earth penetrating tomography applications by modulating the electroject at ELF frequencies.

1998: Projected date for fully operating HAARP system. [Severe worldwide weather in 1997 and 1998. It is no coincidence that the onset of this unprecedented weather coincided with the completion of the HAARP system. Now, scientists can create and control all types of weather, especially disasters].

2004: An unprecedented 3 hurricanes form within 30 days in the eastern Atlantic and Carribean. Hurricanes Charley and Frances pound Florida sustaining more monetary damages than any previous two storm systems combined. Hurricane Ivan strikes between Mobile Bay (Alabama) and Pensacola (Florida). [Signs that Ivan and Charley were being steered are evident in how they by-passed Jamaica to the south and also headed up to the Gulf of Mexico with little to no landfall of any significance... until hitting Florida].

[ Bericht 0% gewijzigd door Mirage op 05-11-2005 10:43:45 ]

Volgens jouw stukje is het simpelweg strooien van ijzeroxide op een wolk genoeg om hem groter te laten groeien en daarna heftiger te laten regenen.

De redenen die ik gevonden heb voor chemtrails: (aangezien jij blijkbaar te beroerd bent om ze even op te noemen)

- Weersbeinvloeding (goed, zou kunnen)
- biologische oorlogsvoering (lijkt me onwijze onzin, dat kan dus bv wel beter via drinkwatervoorzieningen)
- mind control (huh kun je beter middels hallucinerende drankjes of geluidseffecten doen)
- zaken gerelateerd aan de new world order (waarschijnlijk bovenstaande zaken)

Kortom, de enige plausibele verklaring is beinvloeding van het weer. En als je je eigen tekst hebt gelezen heb je daar dus wolken voor nodig, en zelfs grote wolken of orkanen.
Leg mij dan eens uit waarom gelovers dan zo paranoïa allemaal plaatjes van lege luchten met een paar contrails laten zien? waarom is dat dan?
Heus niet om ons te beinvloeden of ziek te maken, daar is die troep namelijk veel te hoog voor, dat ademen wij nooit van zijn leven in.

wederom conclusie: onzin, de enige reden is bij deze ontkracht.

Edward Tellar's "Sun screen" document:

http://www.rense.com/general18/scatteringEdTellerwithnotes.pdf

PDF-bestand met de belangrijkste terzake doende gedeeltes in geel gearceerd. Handig! En ook weer een aanrader. Het maakt een van de logisch klinkende redenen een stuk duidelijker.

Goed, we zijn al een stap dichter bij elkaar gekomen uiteindelijk.
We zijn het erover eens dat het dus gebruikt voor beinvloeding van het weer.
Als ik even vluchtig dat pdf document bekijk gaat dit meer om het tegengaan van het broeikaseffect door het weer te beinvloeden op sommige plaatsen.

Lijkt mij enigszins vergezocht of niet?
Elk logisch nadenkend mens weet dat dit helemaal geen zin heeft, verander je iets bij bv afrika dan kan het klimaat in tokio ineens veranderen. Alle weer systemen hebben allemaal invloed op elkaar.

quote:

Op vrijdag 4 november 2005 16:01 schreef Metro2005 het volgende:
Volgens jouw stukje is het simpelweg strooien van ijzeroxide op een wolk genoeg om hem groter te laten groeien en daarna heftiger te laten regenen.

De redenen die ik gevonden heb voor chemtrails: (aangezien jij blijkbaar te beroerd bent om ze even op te noemen)

- Weersbeinvloeding (goed, zou kunnen)
- biologische oorlogsvoering (lijkt me onwijze onzin, dat kan dus bv wel beter via drinkwatervoorzieningen)
- mind control (huh kun je beter middels hallucinerende drankjes of geluidseffecten doen)
- zaken gerelateerd aan de new world order (waarschijnlijk bovenstaande zaken)

Kortom, de enige plausibele verklaring is beinvloeding van het weer. En als je je eigen tekst hebt gelezen heb je daar dus wolken voor nodig, en zelfs grote wolken of orkanen.

Misschien dat deze trails ons moeten beschermen tegen uvstraling van de zon?Of vanwege de magnetische deeltjes?In ieder geval iets wat met de zonneactiviteit te maken heeft.Daar heeft toch iedereen het over,van biologen tot metereologen,van spiritisten tot sterrenkundigen. En niet te vergeten de Maya fans en 2012 gelovigen.

quote:

Leg mij dan eens uit waarom gelovers dan zo paranoïa allemaal plaatjes van lege luchten met een paar contrails laten zien? waarom is dat dan?

Ik ben helemaal niet paranoia,en ik zal hier in dit topic zeker een keer foto's plaatsen. Het is namelijk nog erger dan ik op de afbeeldingen hier in dit topic heb gezien!

quote:

Heus niet om ons te beinvloeden of ziek te maken, daar is die troep namelijk veel te hoog voor, dat ademen wij nooit van zijn leven in.

Ha,als de lucht één en al trails is dan moeten wj het wel inademen.(of er nou iets chemisch in zit of niet).
En de hoogte maakt niks uit. Ik heb vliegtuigen hoog,maar ook laag zien over vliegen met het zelfde uitstoot resultaat.

quote:

wederom conclusie: onzin, de enige reden is bij deze ontkracht.

Misschien jouw conclusie ,maar de mijne niet.En dan nog wat,mensen die weten dat er chemtrails bestaan worden gelijk op één hoop gegooid met paranoia,conspiracy zoekende fanaten. Dat slaat dus nergens op. Nogmaals,ik beweer niet dat er iets chemisch gesproeid word,maar normaal is het echt niet!Je zult echt verbaast zijn als je de lucht hier in Almelo ziet.

quote:

Op vrijdag 4 november 2005 17:27 schreef Wombcat het volgende:

[..]

Het is dus wel een normaal produkt van een verbrandingsmotor. Daar komt altijd waterdamp bij vrij.
[..]

bron
Dit is dus bij een gewone benzinemotor (of diesel).

En ook bij een straalmotor treedt het op:
[..]
bron

Aanvullend kunnen contrails onder de juiste omstandigheden uitgroeien tot deze cirrus wolken:

quote:

The Facts: Under certain meterological conditions, high-altitude contrails can serve as a catalyst for the growth of cirrus clouds that sometimes expand to enormous size. In other words, what starts out as a small contrail sometimes seeds the growth of a huge cirrus cloud. You will note that so-called "chemtrails" are seldom if ever seen except in the presence of cirrus clouds. However, if they were actually "posion spraying," this correlation would not exist, and they would be seen just as often in skies with cumulous clouds, or with no clouds at all.

Kan iemand eens plaatjes posten van chemtrails, zonder cirrus wolken in de buurt?

quote:

Op vrijdag 4 november 2005 17:45 schreef Quarks het volgende:

[..]

Aanvullend kunnen contrails onder de juiste omstandigheden uitgroeien tot deze cirrus wolken:

[afbeelding]
[..]

Kan iemand eens plaatjes posten van chemtrails, zonder cirrus wolken in de buurt?

Nou,de lucht met nepwolken die ik bedoel zien er wel wat anders uit dan de strepen van deze foto. Dit kan je niet eens wolken noemen. Dit zijn de beruchte chemtrails.
Zo ziet het er de eerste minuten uit ja.
Maar daarna....... Na een uurtje ofzo.......

quote:

Op vrijdag 4 november 2005 19:32 schreef Ratelslangetje het volgende:

[..]

Nou,de lucht met nepwolken die ik bedoel zien er wel wat anders uit dan de strepen van deze foto. Dit kan je niet eens wolken noemen. Dit zijn de beruchte chemtrails.
Zo ziet het er de eerste minuten uit ja.
Maar daarna....... Na een uurtje ofzo.......

De wolken op die foto zullen nog we verder uitelkaar drijven.
En waarom zijn het nepwolken? omdat ze er vreemd uitzien? er bestaan hele vreemde wolkenformaties.

Zoals:


Post jij dan eens foto's met chemtrails zonder cirrus wolken.

Quarks,ik wil dat echt wel doen.
Ik moet dan wel even afwachten wanneer er weer gechemtraild word.
En ik moet er even achter komen hoe ik de foto's geplaatst krijg vanaf een mobieltje.
Maar ik beloof dat jullie ze te zien krijgen zodra ik ze heb gemaakt.

quote:

Op vrijdag 4 november 2005 19:57 schreef Ratelslangetje het volgende:
Quarks,ik wil dat echt wel doen.
Ik moet dan wel even afwachten wanneer er weer gechemtraild word.
En ik moet er even achter komen hoe ik de foto's geplaatst krijg vanaf een mobieltje.
Maar ik beloof dat jullie ze te zien krijgen zodra ik ze heb gemaakt.

Waarschijnlijk heb je een kabeltje waar een stekkertje aan zit die op je telefoon past en waar aan de andere kant een stekkertje zit die in je USB poort past.
Dan heb je waarschijnlijk ook een installatiecdtje oid bij je foon gekregen.

Als de foto's eenmaal op je pc staan zoek je een plek om te uploaden.
imageshack.com of photobucket b.v.

Het is eindelijk bekend door wie chemtrails veroorzaakt worden !!
Het zijn Belgische piloten die anders de weg niet terug kunnen vinden.

quote:

Op zaterdag 5 november 2005 10:32 schreef HenriOsewoudt het volgende:
Het is eindelijk bekend door wie chemtrails veroorzaakt worden !!
Het zijn Belgische piloten die anders de weg niet terug kunnen vinden.

Ik beschreef gewoon wat ik vaak heb gezien. En het is nog erger dan op het filmpje of de afbeeldingen hier.
Maar foto's maak ik en zal ze hier plaatsen.