NL-Antisemitisme 48% gegroeid na 7 okt 23 #12

quote:

Op donderdag 7 mei 2026 20:28 schreef Since2003 het volgende:
"vermeende"

quote:

Op maandag 11 mei 2026 21:35 schreef Chadi het volgende:
Zionism, at its base, is the belief in Jewish supremacy between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, and just like any other ideology that subscribes to racial, national or religious supremacy, it is illegitimate

quote:

Islamism, at its base, is the belief in (political) Islam and Arab supremacy under Sharia law between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, and just like any other ideology that subscribes to racial, national or religious supremacy, it is illegitimate.

quote:

Op dinsdag 12 mei 2026 18:53 schreef Qarrad het volgende:
Hier nog een zorgwekkend ding dat mij ook al opviel op Wikipedia: opduikende of weggehaalde stukken over Israël en Palestina. Hij is nu weer weg, maar er was een pagina over het "historische" Syria-Palestine en diverse links ernaar om te proberen te bewijzen dat er ooit een onafhankelijke Palestijnse staat is geweest.

[ x ]

De derde wereldoorlog is allang begonnen en hij draait om informatie.

quote:

Op dinsdag 12 mei 2026 19:44 schreef Zoddie het volgende:

[..]
[..]
T4P
Tech 4 Palestine, grote groep die met gecoördineerde targets met name Wikipedia artikelen aanpassen met Pro-Palestina propaganda.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tech_for_Palestine

Hier een wat mindere betrouwbare bron maar nog wel interessant om te lezen, deze gaat dieper in op wat T4P echt doet.
https://www.piratewires.c(...)-palestine-narrative

quote:

Op woensdag 13 mei 2026 00:51 schreef Chadi het volgende:

[..]
Islam is tegen Arab supremacy. Die vlieger gaat niet op. Mooi geprobeerd na twee dagen denken.

De quote is van Levy. De zelf hatende jood. Je weet wel iemand die voor gelijkheid is ongeacht geloof.

quote:

Especially in view of Eddy’s and Henderson’s association of Zionism with racism and their refusal to address the issue of racism and antisemitism in Arab societies, the statement by Jamal Husseini, the Arab Higher Committee’s representative at the UN, on September 29 to the UN’s Ad Hoc Committee on Palestine is of particular interest—and historical importance. Husseini said that the Arab “struggle against the Zionist invasion” had “nothing to do with anti-Semitism,” which was a strictly Western bigotry. The Zionist claims to Palestine had “no legal or moral basis.”

However, he then articulated an implicitly racist argument. The Arab world was “a racial homogeneity.” Its people spoke “one language and have the same history, traditions, and aspirations.” The Arabs’ “unity in all those matters” was “a basis for mutual understanding and a solid foundation for peace.” It was in stark contrast to nations with “different nationalities and non-homogenous communities. . . . This condition created always an atmosphere of antagonism that culminated in a calamitous war.”

Bron

quote:

From 1941 to 1945, Hajj Amin al-Husseini lived in Nazi Germany where he served the Nazi war effort in
many ways, including the broadcast of Nazi propaganda to the Arab world. In his radio broadcasts and leaflets, al-Husseini repeated his allegation that “the Jews” wished to “wipe out the Arabs and Islam.”

The Jews believed that “everything had been created for their sake” and that “other men are animals which could be used for their own purposes.”The Jews “have been the enemies of the Arabs and of Islam since its emergence.” The Nazis eagerly took up this refrain in other Arabic- language radio broadcasts, portraying World War II as “a war for the survival of the Arabs and Islam.”

Bron (p. 213)

quote:

Al-Husseini often went beyond calling for the ethnic cleansing of Jews from Muslim lands and openly incited genocide. “Kill the Jews wherever you find them. This pleases God, history, and religion” (emphasis in the
original). In November 1943, when the Holocaust was in full swing, al-Husseini informed his audience that the Germans had “decided to find a definitive solution to the Jewish danger,” and he urged all Arabs and Muslims to join the Germans in this “common battle against the Jewish danger.”

Bron (p. 214)

quote:

The Arab response in Palestine to the removal of dhimmitude—enacted primarily through the Ottoman Tanzimat reforms, including the Hatt-ı Şerif of Gülhane (1839) and the Reform Edict of 1856—was marked by widespread popular resentment, social alienation, and localized religious backlash.

While the imperial government aimed to cultivate a unified identity (Ottomanism) by granting legal equality to non-Muslims, the sudden disruption of the traditional Islamic social hierarchy triggered several distinct reactions among the local Arab population:

1. Resentment Over Loss of Muslim Primacy

The local Muslim majority largely viewed the abolition of dhimmi status not as progress, but as a direct threat to the established theological and social order.
• Status Inversion: For centuries, Jews and Christians occupied a legally protected but subordinate social class (rayah). Seeing these communities elevated to legal peers under pressure from Western Christian powers caused deep-seated resentment.
• Famous Contemporary Record: Senior Ottoman statesman Ahmed Cevdet Pasha famously recorded the Muslim sentiment of the era, noting that Muslims lamented the loss of their sacred ancestral rights, complaining that they were now "equal with the giaour (infidel)"

2. Backlash Against Economic and Legal ChangesThe reforms opened new avenues for minority communities while imposing new burdens on Muslims:

• The Land Law of 1858 and Foreign Property Rights: The 1856 Edict allowed foreign nationals to purchase land in the Ottoman Empire. Local Arab peasants and elites in Palestine watched with growing alarm as wealthy European Jewish and Christian buyers used new property laws to acquire real estate, occasionally displacing tenant farmers.
• Exemption from Conscription: While non-Muslims were technically made eligible for military conscription, they were allowed to pay an exemption tax (bedel-i askeri). Local Muslim families, who bore the brutal brunt of physical conscription into the imperial army, grew bitter that minorities could easily buy their way out of service.
• Western Diplomatic "Capitulations": Local Christians and Jews increasingly secured foreign protection from European consulates, which exempted them from local taxation and Ottoman courts. Local Arabs viewed this economic and legal mobility as unfair favoritism backed by foreign imperialists.

3. Outbreaks of Sectarian Violence and Riots

The friction caused by the erosion of dhimmitude translated into periodic bursts of communal unrest:

• Rise in Blood Libels and Riots: Anti-minority animosity increased during the mid-to-late 19th century. Anti-Semitic pogroms and riots, often triggered by imported European "blood libel" accusations, occurred in Jerusalem during the 1840s, 1870s, and 1890s.
• Spillover Effects: The violence in Palestine was part of a broader regional anxiety. The same resentment against Tanzimat equality directly fueled massive anti-Christian massacres in nearby Damascus and Mount Lebanon in 1860.

4. Fragmented Arab Christian and Elite Responses

The reaction was not entirely uniform across all Arab demographics in Palestine:

• Urban Civic Coexistence: In urban centers like Jerusalem and Jaffa, a segment of the educated Arab elite (both Muslim and Christian) slowly adapted to the reforms, forming a shared civic identity centered around modern municipal governance and local newspapers
• Emergence of Arab Nationalism: Paradoxically, early Arab anti-Zionist and nationalist movements at the turn of the 20th century were heavily championed by local Arab Christians. Having lost their traditional dhimmi protections under the old system, they embraced secular Arab nationalism to integrate into the changing political landscape while remaining deeply wary of European Jewish immigration.

Bron: Google Gemini

quote:

Op woensdag 13 mei 2026 18:34 schreef Chadi het volgende:

[..]
Vlieg je weer naar hunnie..

quote:

Op woensdag 13 mei 2026 23:18 schreef Chadi het volgende:

[..]
Je bewijst helemaal niks. Het feit dat zionisme een extreem rechtse gedachtengoed is, blijft staan.

Daar heb je niks in tegen gebracht. Het enige wat je gedaan hebt is een toevlucht gezocht om het onderwerp te verleggen.