NWS Nieuws & Achtergronden
Discussieer hier diepgaander over de actualiteiten.
India: verkrachting binnen huwelijk strafbaar, sommige mannen boycotten huwelijk
https://www.reddit.com/r/(...)arital_rape_so_some/
https://www.vice.com/en/a(...)laws-marriage-strike
==================================================================
India Plans to Criminalize Marital Rape, So Some Men Are Boycotting Marriage
==================================================================
Young men in the “marriage strike” movement say they won’t get married to avoid prosecution from what they call “false” rape allegations.
This week, as the Delhi high court hears arguments to potentially criminalize marital rape, the debate has crash-landed out of the courtroom into keyboard warrior territory.
The hashtag #marriagestrike has been trending on Twitter in India, with a number of men vowing to shun marriage altogether if marital rape becomes a criminal offense in the country.
Proponents of the marriage strike movement believe that a marital rape law could wrongfully prosecute innocent married men with false rape charges, especially as a means for wives to gain additional alimony in divorce cases.
“Already as of now in India, it is a crime for a man to get married. If a man gets married and if he is accused [of rape], there is no way for him to defend himself. He has no protection,” Anil Kumar, creator of the #marriagestrike hashtag and founder of men’s rights organisation Save Indian Family Foundation, told VICE World News. The proposed measure, however, does not equate an accusation of rape with conviction.
Many social media users have mocked the hashtag and the marriage boycott threats from the frantic men. One person tweeted: “men on #MarriageStrike – is it a threat or a promise?” Another wrote: “Kudos to Indian men for trending #MarriageStrike. More power to you guys. Please don’t call it off. I have found a new excuse to give my parents in order to postpone the marriage talks at my home. Thank you.”
India is one of 36 countries where marital rape is not criminalized. The Indian Penal Code assumes all sex within marriage is inherently consensual, stating that “sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife, the wife not being under fifteen years of age, is not rape.” The Delhi government said a law on marital rape is unnecessary as it is covered by an existing section of the penal code that deals with cruelty inflicted on a woman by her husband.
Marital rape is a pressing problem in India. A national family health survey conducted in 2015 found that the average Indian woman is 17 times more likely to face sexual violence from her husband than from others. However, the prevailing male-dominated point of view permeates even the bureaucracy, as shown by the government’s aversion to the marital rape law.
In a court pleading, the Delhi government said: “It has to be ensured adequately that marital rape does not become a phenomenon, which may destabilise the institution of marriage apart from being an easy tool for harassing the husbands.”
Men’s rights groups such as Purush Aayog are pushing back legally and saying rape laws have no space in a marriage.
“I strongly think that consent and willingness of sexual acts are ingrained within the act of marriage. If you will bring this rape law inside the marriage and the husband will be given punishment, then who will marry?” Barkha Trehan, a woman and president of Purush Aayog, told VICE World News.
“Just yesterday, I received 15 to 20 calls from different men who are of marriageable age and they told me: ‘Why would I get married? Do I want to spoil my career? Do I want to lose my dignity? Do I want to become the biggest criminal on earth behind bars for no reason? Why would I want to marry?’”
According to journalist Rituparna Chatterjee, who covers gender politics, the #marriagestrike movement aims to usurp necessary protections for married survivors of sexual violence.
“Sex in any form of partnership requires the consent of both parties, and trying to take away that protection from women in married relationships based on a yet unproven fear that the law might be misused by women to register false cases of rape, is [indicative of] cis male entitlement to women’s bodies,” Chatterjee told VICE World News.
“The right questions to ask are, what kind of safeguarding is going to be built into the law? What checks and balances will it have? Instead of trying to stop it through ridiculous self-goal hashtags.”
https://www.vice.com/en/a(...)laws-marriage-strike
==================================================================
India Plans to Criminalize Marital Rape, So Some Men Are Boycotting Marriage
==================================================================
Young men in the “marriage strike” movement say they won’t get married to avoid prosecution from what they call “false” rape allegations.
This week, as the Delhi high court hears arguments to potentially criminalize marital rape, the debate has crash-landed out of the courtroom into keyboard warrior territory.
The hashtag #marriagestrike has been trending on Twitter in India, with a number of men vowing to shun marriage altogether if marital rape becomes a criminal offense in the country.
Proponents of the marriage strike movement believe that a marital rape law could wrongfully prosecute innocent married men with false rape charges, especially as a means for wives to gain additional alimony in divorce cases.
“Already as of now in India, it is a crime for a man to get married. If a man gets married and if he is accused [of rape], there is no way for him to defend himself. He has no protection,” Anil Kumar, creator of the #marriagestrike hashtag and founder of men’s rights organisation Save Indian Family Foundation, told VICE World News. The proposed measure, however, does not equate an accusation of rape with conviction.
Many social media users have mocked the hashtag and the marriage boycott threats from the frantic men. One person tweeted: “men on #MarriageStrike – is it a threat or a promise?” Another wrote: “Kudos to Indian men for trending #MarriageStrike. More power to you guys. Please don’t call it off. I have found a new excuse to give my parents in order to postpone the marriage talks at my home. Thank you.”
India is one of 36 countries where marital rape is not criminalized. The Indian Penal Code assumes all sex within marriage is inherently consensual, stating that “sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife, the wife not being under fifteen years of age, is not rape.” The Delhi government said a law on marital rape is unnecessary as it is covered by an existing section of the penal code that deals with cruelty inflicted on a woman by her husband.
Marital rape is a pressing problem in India. A national family health survey conducted in 2015 found that the average Indian woman is 17 times more likely to face sexual violence from her husband than from others. However, the prevailing male-dominated point of view permeates even the bureaucracy, as shown by the government’s aversion to the marital rape law.
In a court pleading, the Delhi government said: “It has to be ensured adequately that marital rape does not become a phenomenon, which may destabilise the institution of marriage apart from being an easy tool for harassing the husbands.”
Men’s rights groups such as Purush Aayog are pushing back legally and saying rape laws have no space in a marriage.
“I strongly think that consent and willingness of sexual acts are ingrained within the act of marriage. If you will bring this rape law inside the marriage and the husband will be given punishment, then who will marry?” Barkha Trehan, a woman and president of Purush Aayog, told VICE World News.
“Just yesterday, I received 15 to 20 calls from different men who are of marriageable age and they told me: ‘Why would I get married? Do I want to spoil my career? Do I want to lose my dignity? Do I want to become the biggest criminal on earth behind bars for no reason? Why would I want to marry?’”
According to journalist Rituparna Chatterjee, who covers gender politics, the #marriagestrike movement aims to usurp necessary protections for married survivors of sexual violence.
“Sex in any form of partnership requires the consent of both parties, and trying to take away that protection from women in married relationships based on a yet unproven fear that the law might be misused by women to register false cases of rape, is [indicative of] cis male entitlement to women’s bodies,” Chatterjee told VICE World News.
“The right questions to ask are, what kind of safeguarding is going to be built into the law? What checks and balances will it have? Instead of trying to stop it through ridiculous self-goal hashtags.”
Natuurlijk zijn de mannen weer het echte slachtoffer. Nu alleen even wachten tot div. Fok! incels het hier mee eens zijn.
Het is toch alleen maar goed om het huwelijk af te schaffen?
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
Het laatste deel van de OP geld voor heel veel zaken.
"Het is onzin om XXX te verbieden omdat sommige mensen er niet mee om kunnen gaan."
"Het is onzin om XXX te verbieden omdat sommige mensen er niet mee om kunnen gaan."
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
waarom?quote:Op zondag 23 januari 2022 16:37 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:
Het is toch alleen maar goed om het huwelijk af te schaffen?
Reason is not automatic, those who deny it cannot be conquered by it, Ayn Rand
Discuseren met domme mensen verlies ik omdat ik niet genoeg ervaring heb met dom lullen.
Discuseren met domme mensen verlies ik omdat ik niet genoeg ervaring heb met dom lullen.
Omdat het huwelijk bedoeld was om macht/geld netjes te overerven. De gemeenschap moest weten dat een kroonprins legitiem was en dus werd de moeder via een (religieus) ritueel eigendom van de vader.quote:
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
Ik dacht altijd dat hindoes veel vredelievender waren dan de moslims, maar blijkbaar zijn beide partijen net zo conservatief..
nee hoorquote:
[..]
Omdat het huwelijk bedoeld was om macht/geld netjes te overerven. De gemeenschap moest weten dat een kroonprins legitiem was en dus werd de moeder via een (religieus) ritueel eigendom van de vader.
Reason is not automatic, those who deny it cannot be conquered by it, Ayn Rand
Discuseren met domme mensen verlies ik omdat ik niet genoeg ervaring heb met dom lullen.
Discuseren met domme mensen verlies ik omdat ik niet genoeg ervaring heb met dom lullen.
Vooral in India vechten ze elkaar al eeuwenlang de tent uit en er zijn zeer orthodoxe en extreme hindoes.quote:
Ik dacht altijd dat hindoes veel vredelievender waren dan de moslims, maar blijkbaar zijn beide partijen net zo conservatief..
Free Assange! Hack the Planet
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
[b]Op dinsdag 6 januari 2009 19:59 schreef Papierversnipperaar het volgende:[/b]
De gevolgen van de argumenten van de anti-rook maffia
Ook hier zie je steeds meer scheidingen en minder huwelijken.
Ik verwacht dat die trend wel doorzet.
Een huwelijk heeft niet echt een toegevoegde waarde meer.
Ik verwacht dat die trend wel doorzet.
Een huwelijk heeft niet echt een toegevoegde waarde meer.
1 vraag: HOE GAAN ZE DIT BEWIJZEN?
²
²
Misgun niemand zijn profijt, laat elk op hoope bouwe. Ofschoon wie mij ook benijdt, fortuin moet zijn loop behouden.
Bansheeboy: Fok!ker van de week!
[Without heart we would be mere machines]
Bergkamp, Zlatan, Van Persie, Ziyech, Quaresma
Bansheeboy: Fok!ker van de week!
[Without heart we would be mere machines]
Bergkamp, Zlatan, Van Persie, Ziyech, Quaresma
Zeer goede zaak dat verkrachting binnen het huwelijk strafbaar gaat worden in India. Verstandige vrouwen laten mannen die tegen deze wetgeving zijn en daarom niet willen trouwen het beste volledig links liggen.
Ja, want niet verkracht willen worden door je eigen man en als dat dan toch gebeurd er wat aan kunnen doen is echt heel feministisch.quote:
Feministen slopen het huwelijk en vragen zich af waarom ze oud, eenzaam en met 10 katten eindigen.
Our task must be to free ourselves by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature and its beauty.
Het heeft er alle schijn van dat jouw nick niet helemaal accuraat is.quote:
Feministen slopen het huwelijk en vragen zich af waarom ze oud, eenzaam en met 10 katten eindigen.
"This is the day you will always remember as the day you almost caught Captain Jack Sparrow".
Ik gok zomaar dat het voor iedereen een zegen is, dat de betreffende mannen zich onthouden van het huwelijk (of voortplanting als het even kan).
Idd, waarom zou je nog gaan trouwen als je niet eens je vrouw meer mag verkrachten?quote:
Feministen slopen het huwelijk en vragen zich af waarom ze oud, eenzaam en met 10 katten eindigen.
Nee man, huwelijk is er om het kinderen te krijgen en opvoeden te bevorderen.quote:
[..]
Omdat het huwelijk bedoeld was om macht/geld netjes te overerven. De gemeenschap moest weten dat een kroonprins legitiem was en dus werd de moeder via een (religieus) ritueel eigendom van de vader.
Wat jij schrijft is feministische prietpraat.
India 
Much like down syndrom, red hair is a genetic mutation, and it occurs when a human has unprotected sex with a clown.
Mooi. Er zijn wel genoeg Indiërs.
You can learn anything, the secret lies in discipline.
"What the mind can conceive and believe, it can achieve"
You will make mistakes. Forgive yourself. Move on. Start rebuilding.
"What the mind can conceive and believe, it can achieve"
You will make mistakes. Forgive yourself. Move on. Start rebuilding.
Het is natuurlijk wel makkelijk roepen dat je nu vrouwen gaat boycotten in een land waar er een aanzienlijk mannenoverschot is (vanwege meisjesbaby's onwenselijk i.v.m. bruidsschat en het later inwonen bij de schoonfamilie) en je toch al redelijk kansloos was.
Dit klinkt vrij middeleeuws maar in Nederland is verkrachting binnen het huwelijk ook pas sinds 1991 strafbaar. Het CDA was overigens toentertijd niet bepaald enthousiast voorstander van zo'n verbod, en SGP, GPV en RPF waren destijds van mening dat verkrachting in het huwelijk niet bestond.quote:India is one of 36 countries where marital rape is not criminalized. The Indian Penal Code assumes all sex within marriage is inherently consensual, stating that “sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife, the wife not being under fifteen years of age, is not rape.
[ Bericht 9% gewijzigd door -XOR- op 23-01-2022 20:46:35 ]
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
|
|
India: verkrachting binnen huwelijk strafbaar, sommige mannen boycotten huwelijk
