NWS Nieuws & Achtergronden
Discussieer hier diepgaander over de actualiteiten.
quote:Op donderdag 4 juni 2020 11:00 schreef 00wildchild het volgende:
Vind het grappig dat er mensen zijn die de racisme ontkennen terwijl zelfs de president gewoon uitgesproken racistisch is en dat niet onder stoelen of banken steekt.
Check die racist!
Voorbeelden van namen en dat zou dan moeten aantonen de Washington post nep nieuws maakt. Gast dan zou je tenminste naar de volgens jou nep nieuws artikelen van de betreffende media outlet moeten verwijzen dit is natuurlijk de welbekende shitshow die je er zo van maakt.quote:
[..]
Covington en Smollett vergeten? Slechts een paar voorbeelden.
Geef even aan waar Trump racistische uitspraken heeft gedaan.quote:
Vind het grappig dat er mensen zijn die de racisme ontkennen terwijl zelfs de president gewoon uitgesproken racistisch is en dat niet onder stoelen of banken steekt.
Bedankt, ik zal er vanavond even goed doorheen lezen (hopelijk vergeet ik dit niet). Nu geen tijd voor.quote:Op donderdag 4 juni 2020 10:52 schreef Poem_ het volgende:
[..]
[..]
[..]
Et cetera. Overigens was het meen ik geen harde paywall en kun je daar gewoon bij.
https://www.investors.com(...)assports-media-bias/quote:
[..]
Voorbeelden van namen en dat zou dan moeten aantonen de Washington post nep nieuws maakt. Gast dan zou je tenminste naar de volgens jou nep nieuws artikelen van de betreffende media outlet moeten verwijzen dit is natuurlijk de welbekende shitshow die je er zo van maakt.
Het is echt niet zo moeilijk te vinden.
Gefeliciteerd ik heb in je topic gepost.
Om bij jouw emmer-analogie te blijven: wanneer de emmer overstroomt omdat hij vol zit met institutioneel racistische druppeltjes, dan maakt het niet zo heel veel uit of van het laatste druppeltje kan bewijzen dat het een individueel racistisch druppeltje is.quote:
[..]
Correct.
[..]
Ik mis jouw punt niet. Jouw punt is waardeloos omdat je hele basis van je argument incorrect is. Als wordt gesteld dat de rellen het gevolg zijn van de laatste druppel in die emmer van institutioneel racisme, dan moet die druppel wel institutioneel racisme zijn. Dan moet je dat bewijzen. Of, wat nu gebeurt, je vult die emmer met iets anders (misinformatie) om je raciale agenda uit te voeren. "Dit is de laatste druppel van institutioneel racisme. Het is wellicht geen geval van institutioneel racisme, maar het is het toch wel". Zie je niet hoe dom je punt is?
Individuele gevallen buiten de context van het patroon van systematisch institutioneel racisme trekken om dan te stellen dat iets wel/niet van toepassing is op het individuele geval, om vervolgens te kunnen concluderen dat het patroon niet bestaat. Over domme punten gesproken.
En jij negeert het bestaan van sociaal-economische klassen en het concept van sociale mobiliteit.quote:[..]
Omdat individuele gevallen het colelctief vormen. Weer spreekt de socialist in je. je negeert individuele gevallen ten behoeve van de collectieve gedachte.
Hoe ontstaan disfunctionerende gezinnen? Zie je dat vaker aan de onderkant van de samenleving? Kip/ei-verhaal.quote:[..]
Misschien moeten ze de familiestructuur wat meer gaan waarderen? Een compleet gezin is een enorme hulp om niet als eenf aalhaas te eindigen. Maar als 70% van de zwarten zonder vader opgroeit (behalve vadertje staat natuurlijk, aangemoedigd door de rassenagenda van de Demcoraten), dan is er weinig hoop. Daar zit het grootste probleem.
Zie hier, de aap komt uit de mouw.quote:Het institutioneel racisme komt van de mensen die jij steunt. Jij bent het probleem. Mensen die jij steunt zorgen voor een blijvende zwarte onderklasse. Maar het is vooral een mentaliteitsprobleem in de zwarte gemeenschap zelf. De waarde van het gezin niet zien, onderwijs als iets blanks zien...In welke mate is dat de schuld van "institutioneel racisme"?
Huilen dan.
Go Back Where You Came From': The Long Rhetorical Roots Of Trump's Racist Tweetsquote:
[..]
Geef even aan waar Trump racistische uitspraken heeft gedaan.
Trump first raised the issue during a rally last year in Alabama. A day, later he tweeted that NFL players should be fired if they protest during the anthem.
Snel gelezen (want ben op werk) maar ga terug naar waar je vandaan komt is niet racistisch.quote:
[..]
Go Back Where You Came From': The Long Rhetorical Roots Of Trump's Racist Tweets
Ook niet racistisch.quote:
Ja. Zie je hoe Trump in die foto zijn walging onderdrukt? Want hij is toch echt wel een racist.quote:
[..]
Als ik 100 keer iets steel en 1 keer wel betaal, ben ik nog steeds een dief.
En wie zeggen dar Trump een racist is? Het volk dat zegt "als je alle illegalen uitzet, wie maakt er dan je wc schoon?". Dat is hoe zij blanken zien, en hoe zij minderheden zien. Goeie wel.
De populariteit en toegankelijkheid van president Obama destijds 
twitter:markmobility twitterde op dinsdag 02-06-2020 om 20:48:54 In case you wanted to remember the reception when a real president walked through a park near the @WhiteHouse. https://t.co/ZLYi3q1PdM reageer retweet
In case you wanted to remember the reception when a real president walked through a park near the @
quote:
[..]
Snel gelezen (want ben op werk) maar ga terug naar waar je vandaan komt is niet racistisch.
[..]
Ook niet racistisch.
Ga terug naar je eigen land zie ik toch wel als een superioriteits uitdrukking vanuit trump.quote:Definities. De term racisme wordt op meer manieren gebruikt. In algemene zin betekent racisme dat leden van een bepaald ras zich superieur achten aan leden van een ander ras. ... Velen gebruiken het woord racisme in algemene zin als aanduiding van xenofobie (angst voor vreemdelingen) of etnocentrisme.
Als president oproepen om alle spelers te ontslaan omdat ze tegen racisme protesteren vind ik ook geen presidentieel waardig gedrag.
Ik ben erg benieuwd naar jou totaal wereldvreemde definitie van racisme dan.
Je kan hetzelfde tegen iemand van je eigen ras zeggen. Het statement is niet inherent racistisch.quote:
[..]
[..]
Ga terug naar je eigen land zie ik toch wel als een superioriteits uitdrukking vanuit trump.
Mag je vinden, totaal onbelangrijk.quote:Als president oproepen om alle spelers te ontslaan omdat ze tegen racisme protesteren vind ik ook geen presidentieel waardig gedrag.
quote:Ik ben erg benieuwd naar jou totaal wereldvreemde definitie van racisme dan.
Hoezo? Volgens mij was de context dat er een aantal figuren uit een ander land (ik dacht o.a. AOC) kritiek hadden, en ik meen mij te herinneren dat het erop neer kwam dat Trump toen zei; 'go back to your own country and fix your shit over there'. Dat heeft niet zoveel met superioriteit te maken.quote:
[..]
[..]
Ga terug naar je eigen land zie ik toch wel als een superioriteits uitdrukking vanuit trump.
Niet omdat ze tegen racisme protesteerden, het ging erom dat er geen politieke statements thuis hoorden volgens mij. Het ging in elk geval om alle NFL players, niet alleen de zwarte ofzo (wat wel racistisch zou zijn).quote:Als president oproepen om alle spelers te ontslaan omdat ze tegen racisme protesteren vind ik ook geen presidentieel waardig gedrag.
https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racismequote:Ik ben erg benieuwd naar jou totaal wereldvreemde definitie van racisme dan.
Niet zo moeilijk verder.
twitter:markmobility twitterde op woensdag 03-06-2020 om 13:28:12 Compare and contrast when @realDonaldTrump left the @whitehouse to enter the park across the street. https://t.co/8fAkorc9hj reageer retweet
twitter:younggothamjedi twitterde op donderdag 04-06-2020 om 03:20:17 @markmobility @realDonaldTrump @WhiteHouse Notice in that clip with the cameraman the first cop violently assaults the camera man without cause then a second cop tries to step in and move the cameraman in a more civil manner then a third cop moves the second cop out of the way so he can assault the already fleeing woman? reageer retweet
@markmobility @
Andere tijden. Toen waren het nog niet de elite en media die geweld tegen de president aanmoedigden en verheerlijkten. Maar goed, dat weet jij ook wel.quote:Op donderdag 4 juni 2020 11:31 schreef slashdotter3 het volgende:
twitter:markmobility twitterde op woensdag 03-06-2020 om 13:28:12 Compare and contrast when @:realDonaldTrump left the @:whitehouse to enter the park across the street. https://t.co/8fAkorc9hj reageer retweettwitter:younggothamjedi twitterde op donderdag 04-06-2020 om 03:20:17 @:markmobility @:realDonaldTrump @:WhiteHouse Notice in that clip with the cameraman the first cop violently assaults the camera man without cause then a second cop tries to step in and move the cameraman in a more civil manner then a third cop moves the second cop out of the way so he can assault the already fleeing woman? reageer retweet
De hypocrisie ook in de VS...
Kijk vooral ook even na 5 minuut 15....
[ Bericht 6% gewijzigd door Bocaj op 04-06-2020 11:55:42 ]
Kijk vooral ook even na 5 minuut 15....
[ Bericht 6% gewijzigd door Bocaj op 04-06-2020 11:55:42 ]
Trump blijkt niet de bunker ingevlucht te zijn vanwege de protesten, hij was daar om de bunker te inspecteren.
Mensen die denken dat Trump een angsthaas is
Een hele plausibele verklaring
Mensen die denken dat Trump een angsthaas is
Een hele plausibele verklaring
quote:
De man die zonder beveiliging Noord-Korea binnenloopt de angsthaas noemenquote:
Trump blijkt niet de bunker ingevlucht te zijn vanwege de protesten, hij was daar om de bunker te inspecteren.
Mensen die denken dat Trump een angsthaas is
Een hele plausibele verklaring
[..]
Welke media en elite moedigen en verheerlijken nu dan geweld jegens trump?quote:
[..]
Andere tijden. Toen waren het nog niet de elite en media die geweld tegen de president aanmoedigden en verheerlijkten. Maar goed, dat weet jij ook wel.
Over de andere tijden hoe berichte fox over Obama?
On Fox News, a Former CIA Contractor Threatened to 'Choke' Barack Obama dat zijn pas direct gewelds grappen van die propaganda media organisatie.
https://en.wikipedia.org/(...)#In_housing_and_loanquote:
[..]
Correct.
[..]
Ik mis jouw punt niet. Jouw punt is waardeloos omdat je hele basis van je argument incorrect is. Als wordt gesteld dat de rellen het gevolg zijn van de laatste druppel in die emmer van institutioneel racisme, dan moet die druppel wel institutioneel racisme zijn. Dan moet je dat bewijzen. Of, wat nu gebeurt, je vult die emmer met iets anders (misinformatie) om je raciale agenda uit te voeren. "Dit is de laatste druppel van institutioneel racisme. Het is wellicht geen geval van institutioneel racisme, maar het is het toch wel". Zie je niet hoe dom je punt is?
[..]
Omdat individuele gevallen het colelctief vormen. Weer spreekt de socialist in je. je negeert individuele gevallen ten behoeve van de collectieve gedachte.
[..]
Misschien moeten ze de familiestructuur wat meer gaan waarderen? Een compleet gezin is een enorme hulp om niet als eenf aalhaas te eindigen. Maar als 70% van de zwarten zonder vader opgroeit (behalve vadertje staat natuurlijk, aangemoedigd door de rassenagenda van de Demcoraten), dan is er weinig hoop. Daar zit het grootste probleem. Het institutioneel racisme komt van de mensen die jij steunt. Jij bent het probleem. Mensen die jij steunt zorgen voor een blijvende zwarte onderklasse. Maar het is vooral een mentaliteitsprobleem in de zwarte gemeenschap zelf. De waarde van het gezin niet zien, onderwijs als iets blanks zien...In welke mate is dat de schuld van "institutioneel racisme"?
En ehh .. 'excessive use of force' van de politie jegens afro-amerikaanse burgers valt inmiddels gewoon onder insitutioneel racisme hoor.
[ Bericht 2% gewijzigd door probeer op 04-06-2020 12:28:13 ]
"Pools are perfect for holding water"
https://en.wikipedia.org/(...)#In_housing_and_loanquote:
[..]
De enige bron die ik mij kan herinneren was een artikel van de WaPo dat achter een paywall zit.
Als je het niet erg vind ga ik daar inderdaad niet op in.
Maar we snappen wel dat jij koste wat kost blijft negeren dat institutioneel racisme een ding is in de VS.
"Pools are perfect for holding water"
Lachwekkende actquote:
Trudeau’s 21-Second Pause Becomes the Story in Canada
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau struggled to find the words to answer a question about President Trump’s response to the protests roiling the United States.
When asked what he thought of President Trump’s call for military action against American protesters and the tear gassing of peaceful demonstrators to make way for a photo-op, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau paused at his podium for 21 uncomfortable, televised seconds. He opened his mouth, then shut it — twice. He softly groaned.
Finally, in a scene on Tuesday that has now spread wildly around the internet, Mr. Trudeau said: “We all watch in horror and consternation what’s going on in the United States.”
filmpje: https://www.nytimes.com/2(...)-floyd-protests.html
https://www.reddit.com/r/(...)ecomes_the_story_in/
Dat zeg ik ook helemaal niet. Maar ik geef alleen aan waar de onvrede van BLM vandaan komt. Of die verder statistisch correct is maakt weinig uit in een segregeerde maatschappij.quote:Op donderdag 4 juni 2020 01:55 schreef Enchanter het volgende:
[..]
Ja leuk , maar er worden nog steeds meer blanken dan donkere mensen door de politie neer geschoten.
Ja , ik weet het er wonen ook meer blanken dan donkere mensen in de USA..
Maar daarentegen zijn donkere mensen veel meer vertegenwoordigd in criminaliteit dan blanken.
En er al zal ongetwijfeld hier en daar een racistische agent tussen zitten die de het slachtoffer gedood heeft omdat die zwart was , maar we weten natuurlijk niet wat er vooraf zich heeft afgespeeld
Deze statistieken zeggen natuurlijk ook wel het één en ander
[ afbeelding ]
Maar negers
Ceterum censeo Turciam delendam esse.
Op 
Ik dacht, ik ga je link eens even doorlezen. Maar na je opmerking doen we dat dan toch maar niet.quote:
[..]
https://en.wikipedia.org/(...)#In_housing_and_loan
Maar we snappen wel dat jij koste wat kost blijft negeren dat institutioneel racisme een ding is in de VS.
Die link is je al 3x voorgelegd en heb je nog steeds niet willen lezen.quote:
[..]
Ik dacht, ik ga je link eens even doorlezen. Maar na je opmerking doen we dat dan toch maar niet.
Maar doe maar weer leuk alsof het aan een ander ligt dat jij het institutioneel racisme in Amerika al 23 topics lang weigert te erkennen.
"Pools are perfect for holding water"
Niet mijn krant verder, maar;
quote:The Myth of Systemic Police Racism
Hold officers accountable who use excessive force. But there’s no evidence of widespread racial bias.
https://www.wsj.com/artic(...)e-racism-11591119883
Zal ik je helpen?quote:
[..]
De enige bron die ik mij kan herinneren was een artikel van de WaPo dat achter een paywall zit.
Als je het niet erg vind ga ik daar inderdaad niet op in.
A 2017 study of 4.5 million traffic stops by the 100 largest police departments in North Carolina found that blacks and Latinos were more likely to be searched than whites (5.4 percent, 4.1 percent and 3.1 percent, respectively), even though searches of white motorists were more likely than the others to turn up contraband (whites: 32 percent, blacks: 29 percent, Latinos: 19 percent).
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1607.05376.pdf
According to the Justice Department, between 2012 and 2014, black people in Ferguson, Mo., accounted for 85 percent of vehicle stops, 90 percent of citations and 93 percent of arrests, despite comprising 67 percent of the population. Blacks were more than twice as likely as whites to be searched after traffic stops, even though they proved to be 26 percent less likely to be in possession of illegal drugs or weapons. Between 2011 and 2013, blacks also received 95 percent of jaywalking tickets and 94 percent of tickets for “failure to comply.” The Justice Department also found that the racial discrepancy for speeding tickets increased dramatically when researchers looked at tickets based on only an officer’s word vs. tickets based on objective evidence, such as vs. radar. Black people facing similar low-level charges as white people were 68 percent less likely to see those charges dismissed in court. More than 90 percent of the arrest warrants stemming from failure to pay/failure to appear were issued for black people.
https://www.justice.gov/s(...)epartment_report.pdf
A study of “investigatory” traffic stops — that is, stops that did not result in a citation — by police in Kansas City found that blacks were 2.7 times more likely to be pulled over in an investigatory stop, and five times more likely to be searched.
https://www.kcur.org/show(...)ce-practice#stream/0
A study of stop and frisk incidents in Boston between 2007 and 2010 that did not result in a citation or arrest found that 63 percent of such stops were of black people. Blacks made up 24 percent of the city’s population. Incredibly, 97.5 percent of these encounters resulted in no arrest or seizure of contraband.
https://www.aclum.org/sit(...)own-and-targeted.pdf
A 2015 statistical analysis of police shootings from 2011 to 2014 found that the racial disparity in police shootings of black people could not be explained by higher crime rates in majority-black communities.
http://journals.plos.org/(...)journal.pone.0141854
a study published in June reviewed every reported homicide between 1976 and 2009 and found that “homicides with white victims are significantly more likely to be ‘cleared’ by the arrest of a suspect than are homicides with minority victims.”
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3202470
Another ACLU study, this time on the use of stop-and-frisk in Milwaukee between 2010 and 2017, found that in nearly half of the more than 700,000 such stops, the police failed to demonstrate reasonable suspicion as required by the Constitution. The study found that between pedestrian stops and traffic stops, black people were six times more likely to be stopped and searched than white people, and that less than 1 percent of those searches turned up any contraband. Here again, while black and Latino drivers were more likely to be searched, they were 20 percent less likely to be in possession of any contraband.
https://www.aclu.org/blog(...)kee-police-stops-are
A 2017 study of interactions between officers and citizens taken from footage captured by police officer body cameras found that “officers speak with consistently less respect toward black versus white community members, even after controlling for the race of the officer, the severity of the infraction, the location of the stop, and the outcome of the stop.”
http://www.pnas.org/conte(...)/1702413114.full.pdf
An NAACP survey of citizen complaints against police officers in North Charleston, S.C., between 2006 and 2016 found that complaints by white citizens were about two-thirds more likely to be sustained than complaints filed by black citizens. When the complainant alleged excessive force, white complaints were sustained seven times more often than black complaints.
http://www.naacpldf.org/f(...)AL%20July%202017.pdf
According to a Justice Department study released in 2013, throughout the United States, black drivers are about 30 percent more likely to be pulled over than white drivers. Black drivers are also more likely to be pulled over for alleged mechanical or equipment problems with their automobiles, or for record checks. White people are actually more likely to get pulled over for noticeable traffic violations such as speeding. Black drivers are more likely to not be told why they were pulled over.
https://www.washingtonpos(...)=lk_inline_manual_41
In 2016, the ACLU of Florida released a report that found that black drivers in that state were twice as likely to be pulled over for seat-belt violations as white drivers.
https://www.aclu.org/repo(...)belt-law-enforcement
data from New York City showed that black people are arrested for marijuana at eight times the rate of white people. In Manhattan, it’s 15 times as much. Black neighborhoods produce far more arrests than white neighborhoods, despite data showing a similar rate at which residents complain about marijuana use.
https://www.nytimes.com/2(...)rticle®ion=Footer
A 2014 ACLU survey of SWAT teams across the country found that “dynamic entry” and paramilitary police tactics are disproportionately used against black and Latino people. Most of these raids were on people suspected of low-level drug crimes.
https://www.aclu.org/site(...)-report-web-rel1.pdf
In contrast to the assertion that blacks are more likely to be arrested because they’re more likely to use drugs in public, a 2002 study of narcotics search warrants in the San Diego area — that is, warrants to search for drugs in private homes — found that black and Hispanic residents were “significantly over-represented as targets of narcotics search warrants,” even after adjusting for usage rates. The study also found that “searches of White suspects were more successful in recovering the targeted drug than were searches of either Black or Hispanic suspects.”
http://faculty.cwsl.edu/b(...)csSearchWarrants.pdf
According to figures from the National Registry of Exonerations (NER) black people are about five times more likely to go to prison for drug possession than white people. According to exoneration data, black people are also 12 times more likely to be wrongly convicted of drug crimes.
http://www.law.umich.edu/(...)gful_Convictions.pdf
When Harris County, Tex., saw a flaw in how drug testing was conducted at its crime lab, officials went back and exonerated dozens of people who had been wrongly convicted for possession — most pleaded guilty, despite their innocence. This is because prosecutors often promise harsher sentences or more charges for defendants who take a case to trial. Black people comprise 20 percent of the Harris County population but made up 62 percent of the wrongful drug convictions.
https://www.texastribune.org/2017/03/07/report/
Black people comprise about 12.5 percent of drug users but 29 percent of arrests for drug crimes and 33 percent of those incarcerated.
https://www.naacp.org/criminal-justice-fact-sheet/
Blacks were also three times as likely to get hit with — and made up two-thirds of — the sentencing enhancements for committing drug crimes near a school zone, church, park or public housing. In all, when blacks and whites committed similar drug crimes, blacks on average received a sentence that was two-thirds longer. In some parts of the state, it was two or three times longer.
http://projects.heraldtribune.com/bias/bauer/
An analysis of drug war data by the Vera Institute of Justice published this year found that “the risk of incarceration in the federal system for someone who uses drugs monthly and is black is more than seven times that of his or her white counterpart.”
https://storage.googleapi(...)cial-disparities.pdf
A study of criminal cases from 1983 and 1993 found that prosecutors in Philadelphia removed 52 percent of potential black jurors vs. only 23 percent of nonblack jurors.
https://www.aclu.org/other/race-and-death-penalty
Between 2003 and 2012, prosecutors in Caddo Parish, La. — one of the most aggressive death penalty counties in the country — struck 46 percent of prospective black jurors with preemptory challenges, vs. 15 percent of nonblacks.
https://blackstrikes.com/(...)rish_August_2015.pdf
Between 1994 and 2002, Jefferson Parish prosecutors struck 55 percent of blacks, but just 16 percent of whites. Although blacks make up 23 percent of the population, 80 percent of criminal trials had no more than two black jurors in a state where it takes only 10 of 12 juror votes to convict.
https://www.newyorker.com(...)-strike-black-jurors & https://eji.org/sites/def(...)n-jury-selection.pdf
A 2011 study from Michigan State University College of Law found that between 1990 and 2010, state prosecutors struck about 53 percent of black people eligible for juries in criminal cases, vs. about 26 percent of white people. The study’s authors concluded that the chance of this occurring in a race-neutral process was less than 1 in 10 trillion. Even after adjusting for excuses given by prosecutors that tend to correlate with race, the 2-to-1 discrepancy remained. The state legislature had previously passed a law stating that death penalty defendants who could demonstrate racial bias in jury selection could have their sentences changed to life without parole. The legislature later repealed that law.
1.https://digitalcommons.la(...)1330&context=facpubs
2. https://deathpenaltyinfo.(...)e-act-ruling-summary
3. https://www.ncleg.net/Sessions/2009/Bills/Senate/PDF/S461v6.pdf
4. https://edition.cnn.com/2(...)h-penalty/index.html
In a 2010 study, “mock jurors” were given the same evidence from a fictional robbery case but then shown alternate security camera footage depicting either a light-skinned or dark-skinned suspect. Jurors were more likely to evaluate ambiguous, race-neutral evidence against the dark-skinned suspect as incriminating and more likely to find the dark-skinned suspect guilty.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1601615
While white people make up less than half of the country’s murder victims, a 2003 study by Amnesty International found that about 80 percent of the people on death row in the United States killed a white person.
https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/AMR51/046/2003/en/
A 2012 study of Harris County, Tex., cases found that people who killed white victims were 2.5 times more likely to be sentenced to the death penalty than other killers.
In Delaware, according to a 2012 study, “black defendants who kill white victims are seven times as likely to receive the death penalty as are black defendants who kill black victims. … Moreover, black defendants who kill white victims are more than three times as likely to be sentenced to death as are white defendants who kill white victims.”
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2019913
A study of death penalty rates of black perpetrators/white victims vs. white perpetrators/black victims through 1999 showed similar discrepancies. Interestingly, the study found that blacks are underrepresented on death row in proportion to the proportion of murders they commit. But this is largely because most black murderers kill other black people, and prosecutors are far less likely to seek the death penalty when the victim is black.
https://scholarship.law.c(...)=1240&context=facpub
A study of North Carolina murder cases from 1980 through 2007 found that murderers who kill white people are three times more likely to get the death penalty than murderers who kill black people.
https://scholarship.law.u(...)le=4522&context=nclr
A 2000 study commissioned by then-Florida Gov. Jeb Bush (R) found that the state had, as of that time, never executed a white person for killing a black person
http://www.elon.edu/docs/e-web/law/law_review/Issues/Slobogin.pdf
According to a 2002 study commissioned by then-Gov. Frank O’Bannon (D), Indiana had executed only one person for killing a nonwhite victim, and though 47 percent of homicides in the state involved nonwhite victims, just 16 percent of the state’s death sentences did.
https://www.in.gov/ipdc/f(...)0death%20penalty.pdf
A 2014 study looking at 33 years of data found that after adjusting for variables such as the number of victims and brutality of the crimes, jurors in Washington state were 4.5 times more likely to impose the death penalty on black defendants accused of aggravated murder than on white ones.
A 2014 study looking at 33 years of data found that after adjusting for variables such as the number of victims and brutality of the crimes, jurors in Washington state were 4.5 times more likely to impose the death penalty on black defendants accused of aggravated murder than on white ones.
https://files.deathpenalt(...)ashRaceStudy2014.pdf
Black people are also more likely to be wrongly convicted of murder when the victim was white. Only about 15 percent of people killed by black people were white, but 31 percent of black exonorees were wrongly convicted of killing white people. More generally, black people convicted of murder are 50 percent more likely to be innocent than white people convicted of murder.
http://www.law.umich.edu/(...)gful_Convictions.pdf
Innocent black people are also 3.5 times more likely than white people to be wrongly convicted of sexual assault and 12 times more likely to be wrongly convicted of drug crimes. (And remember, data on wrongful convictions is limited in that it can only consider the wrongful convictions we know about.)
https://www.vox.com/polic(...)ocence-prison-racism
A 2000 study of federal cases found that federal prosecutors were about 50 percent more likely to offer a plea bargain to white murder suspects than black suspects that allowed them to avoid the death penalty.
https://www.washingtonpos(...)=lk_inline_manual_96
A 2006 Stanford report found that when a black person was accused of killing a white person, defendants with darker skin and more “stereotypically black” features were twice as likely to receive a death sentence. When the victim was black, there was almost no difference.
https://news.stanford.edu/news/2006/may3/deathworthy-050306.html
A 2016 study found that in Louisiana, killers of white victims were 14 times more likely to be executed than killers of black victims. Black men who killed white women were 30 times more likely to get the death penalty than black men who killed black men. Those convicted of killing white people were also less likely to have their sentences overturned on appeal, and Louisiana hasn’t executed a white person for killing a black person since 1752.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2770761
Studies in other states have produced similar results: In Oklahoma, killers of white women were 9.5 times more likely to get the death penalty than killers of minority men. In Ohio, they were 6 times more likely, and in Florida, 6.5 times more likely.
https://scholarlycommons.(...)le=7615&context=jclc
A 2017 study of about 48,000 criminal cases in Wisconsin showed that white defendants were 25 percent more likely than black defendants to have their most serious charge dismissed in a plea bargain. Among defendants facing misdemeanor charges that could carry a sentence of incarceration, whites were 75 percent more likely to have those charges dropped, dismissed or reduced to a charge that did not include such a punishment.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3036726
A 2016 review of nearly 474,000 criminal cases in Hampton Roads, Va., found that whites were more likely to get plea deals that resulted in no jail time for drug offenses. While facing charges of drug distribution, 48 percent of whites received plea bargains with no jail time, vs. 22 percent of blacks. Among those with prior criminal records who pleaded guilty to robbery, 36 percent of whites got no jail time, vs. 8 percent of blacks.
https://www.yalelawjourna(...)he-effects-of-booker
A 2013 study found that after adjusting for numerous other variables, federal prosecutors were almost twice as likely to bring charges carrying mandatory minimums against black defendants as against white defendants accused of similar crimes.
A 2008 analysis found that black defendants with multiple prior convictions are 28 percent more likely to be charged as “habitual offenders” than white defendants with similar criminal records. The authors conclude that “assessments of dangerousness and culpability are linked to race and ethnicity, even after offense seriousness and prior record are controlled.”
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.(...)79&rep=rep1&type=pdf
A 2007 Harvard study found sentencing discrepancies among black people, depending on the darkness of their skin. The study looked at 67,000 first-time felons in Georgia from 1995 to 2002. The average sentence for white men was 2,689 days. The average for black men was 378 days longer. But light-skinned blacks received sentences of about three and a half months longer than whites. Medium-skinned blacks received a sentence of about a year longer. Dark-skinned blacks received sentences of a year and a half longer.
https://scholar.harvard.e(...)merican-racial-order
A 2011 study of bail in five large U.S. counties found that blacks received $7,000 higher bail than whites for violent crimes, $13,000 higher for drug crimes and $10,000 higher for crimes related to public order. These disparities were calculated after adjusting for the seriousness of the crime, criminal history and other variables.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1990324
A 2011 investigation of presidential pardons by ProPublica found that white federal prisoners are almost four times as likely to receive a pardon than minority federal prisoners.
https://www.propublica.or(...)ons-what-can-be-done
About 16 percent of sexual assaults of white women are committed by black men, but half of the exonerations for sexual assault involve cases in which an eyewitness wrongly identified a black man for the rape of a white woman.
https://time.com/wrongly-convicted/
A study of the pardons granted in Mississippi during former governor Haley Barbour’s tenure found that although blacks make up almost two-thirds of the state’s prison population, they make up fewer than a third of the people to whom Barbour granted clemency. (It is worth noting that this isn’t about the severity of the crime — Barbour pardoned at least eight men who killed their wives or girlfriends.)
https://www.reuters.com/a(...)0120120?feedType=RSS
https://www.cbsnews.com/n(...)r-wives-girlfriends/
A 2015 county-level study of police shootings from 2011 to 2014 found “a significant bias in the killing of unarmed black Americans relative to unarmed white Americans, in that the probability of being black, unarmed, and shot by police is about 3.49 times the probability of being white, unarmed, and shot by police on average.” The study also found “no relationship between county-level racial bias in police shootings and crime rates (even race-specific crime rates), meaning that the racial bias observed in police shootings in this data set is not explainable as a response to local-level crime rates.”
https://journals.plos.org(...)journal.pone.0141854
A 2018 survey of bail practices in Miami and Philadelphia found that “bail judges are racially biased against black defendants, with substantially more racial bias among both inexperienced and part-time judges. We find suggestive evidence that this racial bias is driven by bail judges relying on inaccurate stereotypes that exaggerate the relative danger of releasing black defendants.”
https://university.pretri(...)8e9eef&forceDialog=0
Met droge ogen beweren dat institutioneel racisme niet bestaat is onmogelijk. Ik denk dat je dat aardig als "wegkijken" kan kwalificeren. En let op hè, dit is slechts een selectie.
Huilen dan.
Mooi. Nu mag je verklaren waarom de verschillen door ras worden veroorzaakt, en dan ook nog dat er racisme ten grondslag aan ligt. Jij laat weer zien dat je niet snapt dat het bestaan van een verschil niet betekent dat de oorzaak racisme is. Jij geeft racisme de schuld omdat jij wil dat het racisme is. Maar zo werkt het in de echte wereld niet. Jij laat geen bewijzen van racisme zien, alleen dat er gevallen van verschillen tussen rassen bestaan. En natuurlijk enkel eenzijdig, maar dat vergeef ik je.quote:Op donderdag 4 juni 2020 14:33 schreef Isdatzo het volgende:
[..]
Zal ik je helpen?
A 2017 study of 4.5 million traffic stops by the 100 largest police departments in North Carolina found that blacks and Latinos were more likely to be searched than whites (5.4 percent, 4.1 percent and 3.1 percent, respectively), even though searches of white motorists were more likely than the others to turn up contraband (whites: 32 percent, blacks: 29 percent, Latinos: 19 percent).
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1607.05376.pdf
According to the Justice Department, between 2012 and 2014, black people in Ferguson, Mo., accounted for 85 percent of vehicle stops, 90 percent of citations and 93 percent of arrests, despite comprising 67 percent of the population. Blacks were more than twice as likely as whites to be searched after traffic stops, even though they proved to be 26 percent less likely to be in possession of illegal drugs or weapons. Between 2011 and 2013, blacks also received 95 percent of jaywalking tickets and 94 percent of tickets for “failure to comply.” The Justice Department also found that the racial discrepancy for speeding tickets increased dramatically when researchers looked at tickets based on only an officer’s word vs. tickets based on objective evidence, such as vs. radar. Black people facing similar low-level charges as white people were 68 percent less likely to see those charges dismissed in court. More than 90 percent of the arrest warrants stemming from failure to pay/failure to appear were issued for black people.
https://www.justice.gov/s(...)epartment_report.pdf
A study of “investigatory” traffic stops — that is, stops that did not result in a citation — by police in Kansas City found that blacks were 2.7 times more likely to be pulled over in an investigatory stop, and five times more likely to be searched.
https://www.kcur.org/show(...)ce-practice#stream/0
A study of stop and frisk incidents in Boston between 2007 and 2010 that did not result in a citation or arrest found that 63 percent of such stops were of black people. Blacks made up 24 percent of the city’s population. Incredibly, 97.5 percent of these encounters resulted in no arrest or seizure of contraband.
https://www.aclum.org/sit(...)own-and-targeted.pdf
A 2015 statistical analysis of police shootings from 2011 to 2014 found that the racial disparity in police shootings of black people could not be explained by higher crime rates in majority-black communities.
http://journals.plos.org/(...)journal.pone.0141854
a study published in June reviewed every reported homicide between 1976 and 2009 and found that “homicides with white victims are significantly more likely to be ‘cleared’ by the arrest of a suspect than are homicides with minority victims.”
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3202470
Another ACLU study, this time on the use of stop-and-frisk in Milwaukee between 2010 and 2017, found that in nearly half of the more than 700,000 such stops, the police failed to demonstrate reasonable suspicion as required by the Constitution. The study found that between pedestrian stops and traffic stops, black people were six times more likely to be stopped and searched than white people, and that less than 1 percent of those searches turned up any contraband. Here again, while black and Latino drivers were more likely to be searched, they were 20 percent less likely to be in possession of any contraband.
https://www.aclu.org/blog(...)kee-police-stops-are
A 2017 study of interactions between officers and citizens taken from footage captured by police officer body cameras found that “officers speak with consistently less respect toward black versus white community members, even after controlling for the race of the officer, the severity of the infraction, the location of the stop, and the outcome of the stop.”
http://www.pnas.org/conte(...)/1702413114.full.pdf
An NAACP survey of citizen complaints against police officers in North Charleston, S.C., between 2006 and 2016 found that complaints by white citizens were about two-thirds more likely to be sustained than complaints filed by black citizens. When the complainant alleged excessive force, white complaints were sustained seven times more often than black complaints.
http://www.naacpldf.org/f(...)AL%20July%202017.pdf
According to a Justice Department study released in 2013, throughout the United States, black drivers are about 30 percent more likely to be pulled over than white drivers. Black drivers are also more likely to be pulled over for alleged mechanical or equipment problems with their automobiles, or for record checks. White people are actually more likely to get pulled over for noticeable traffic violations such as speeding. Black drivers are more likely to not be told why they were pulled over.
https://www.washingtonpos(...)=lk_inline_manual_41
In 2016, the ACLU of Florida released a report that found that black drivers in that state were twice as likely to be pulled over for seat-belt violations as white drivers.
https://www.aclu.org/repo(...)belt-law-enforcement
data from New York City showed that black people are arrested for marijuana at eight times the rate of white people. In Manhattan, it’s 15 times as much. Black neighborhoods produce far more arrests than white neighborhoods, despite data showing a similar rate at which residents complain about marijuana use.
https://www.nytimes.com/2(...)rticle®ion=Footer
A 2014 ACLU survey of SWAT teams across the country found that “dynamic entry” and paramilitary police tactics are disproportionately used against black and Latino people. Most of these raids were on people suspected of low-level drug crimes.
https://www.aclu.org/site(...)-report-web-rel1.pdf
In contrast to the assertion that blacks are more likely to be arrested because they’re more likely to use drugs in public, a 2002 study of narcotics search warrants in the San Diego area — that is, warrants to search for drugs in private homes — found that black and Hispanic residents were “significantly over-represented as targets of narcotics search warrants,” even after adjusting for usage rates. The study also found that “searches of White suspects were more successful in recovering the targeted drug than were searches of either Black or Hispanic suspects.”
http://faculty.cwsl.edu/b(...)csSearchWarrants.pdf
According to figures from the National Registry of Exonerations (NER) black people are about five times more likely to go to prison for drug possession than white people. According to exoneration data, black people are also 12 times more likely to be wrongly convicted of drug crimes.
http://www.law.umich.edu/(...)gful_Convictions.pdf
When Harris County, Tex., saw a flaw in how drug testing was conducted at its crime lab, officials went back and exonerated dozens of people who had been wrongly convicted for possession — most pleaded guilty, despite their innocence. This is because prosecutors often promise harsher sentences or more charges for defendants who take a case to trial. Black people comprise 20 percent of the Harris County population but made up 62 percent of the wrongful drug convictions.
https://www.texastribune.org/2017/03/07/report/
Black people comprise about 12.5 percent of drug users but 29 percent of arrests for drug crimes and 33 percent of those incarcerated.
https://www.naacp.org/criminal-justice-fact-sheet/
Blacks were also three times as likely to get hit with — and made up two-thirds of — the sentencing enhancements for committing drug crimes near a school zone, church, park or public housing. In all, when blacks and whites committed similar drug crimes, blacks on average received a sentence that was two-thirds longer. In some parts of the state, it was two or three times longer.
http://projects.heraldtribune.com/bias/bauer/
An analysis of drug war data by the Vera Institute of Justice published this year found that “the risk of incarceration in the federal system for someone who uses drugs monthly and is black is more than seven times that of his or her white counterpart.”
https://storage.googleapi(...)cial-disparities.pdf
A study of criminal cases from 1983 and 1993 found that prosecutors in Philadelphia removed 52 percent of potential black jurors vs. only 23 percent of nonblack jurors.
https://www.aclu.org/other/race-and-death-penalty
Between 2003 and 2012, prosecutors in Caddo Parish, La. — one of the most aggressive death penalty counties in the country — struck 46 percent of prospective black jurors with preemptory challenges, vs. 15 percent of nonblacks.
https://blackstrikes.com/(...)rish_August_2015.pdf
Between 1994 and 2002, Jefferson Parish prosecutors struck 55 percent of blacks, but just 16 percent of whites. Although blacks make up 23 percent of the population, 80 percent of criminal trials had no more than two black jurors in a state where it takes only 10 of 12 juror votes to convict.
https://www.newyorker.com(...)-strike-black-jurors & https://eji.org/sites/def(...)n-jury-selection.pdf
A 2011 study from Michigan State University College of Law found that between 1990 and 2010, state prosecutors struck about 53 percent of black people eligible for juries in criminal cases, vs. about 26 percent of white people. The study’s authors concluded that the chance of this occurring in a race-neutral process was less than 1 in 10 trillion. Even after adjusting for excuses given by prosecutors that tend to correlate with race, the 2-to-1 discrepancy remained. The state legislature had previously passed a law stating that death penalty defendants who could demonstrate racial bias in jury selection could have their sentences changed to life without parole. The legislature later repealed that law.
1.https://digitalcommons.la(...)1330&context=facpubs
2. https://deathpenaltyinfo.(...)e-act-ruling-summary
3. https://www.ncleg.net/Sessions/2009/Bills/Senate/PDF/S461v6.pdf
4. https://edition.cnn.com/2(...)h-penalty/index.html
In a 2010 study, “mock jurors” were given the same evidence from a fictional robbery case but then shown alternate security camera footage depicting either a light-skinned or dark-skinned suspect. Jurors were more likely to evaluate ambiguous, race-neutral evidence against the dark-skinned suspect as incriminating and more likely to find the dark-skinned suspect guilty.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1601615
While white people make up less than half of the country’s murder victims, a 2003 study by Amnesty International found that about 80 percent of the people on death row in the United States killed a white person.
https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/AMR51/046/2003/en/
A 2012 study of Harris County, Tex., cases found that people who killed white victims were 2.5 times more likely to be sentenced to the death penalty than other killers.
In Delaware, according to a 2012 study, “black defendants who kill white victims are seven times as likely to receive the death penalty as are black defendants who kill black victims. … Moreover, black defendants who kill white victims are more than three times as likely to be sentenced to death as are white defendants who kill white victims.”
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2019913
A study of death penalty rates of black perpetrators/white victims vs. white perpetrators/black victims through 1999 showed similar discrepancies. Interestingly, the study found that blacks are underrepresented on death row in proportion to the proportion of murders they commit. But this is largely because most black murderers kill other black people, and prosecutors are far less likely to seek the death penalty when the victim is black.
https://scholarship.law.c(...)=1240&context=facpub
A study of North Carolina murder cases from 1980 through 2007 found that murderers who kill white people are three times more likely to get the death penalty than murderers who kill black people.
https://scholarship.law.u(...)le=4522&context=nclr
A 2000 study commissioned by then-Florida Gov. Jeb Bush (R) found that the state had, as of that time, never executed a white person for killing a black person
http://www.elon.edu/docs/e-web/law/law_review/Issues/Slobogin.pdf
According to a 2002 study commissioned by then-Gov. Frank O’Bannon (D), Indiana had executed only one person for killing a nonwhite victim, and though 47 percent of homicides in the state involved nonwhite victims, just 16 percent of the state’s death sentences did.
https://www.in.gov/ipdc/f(...)0death%20penalty.pdf
A 2014 study looking at 33 years of data found that after adjusting for variables such as the number of victims and brutality of the crimes, jurors in Washington state were 4.5 times more likely to impose the death penalty on black defendants accused of aggravated murder than on white ones.
A 2014 study looking at 33 years of data found that after adjusting for variables such as the number of victims and brutality of the crimes, jurors in Washington state were 4.5 times more likely to impose the death penalty on black defendants accused of aggravated murder than on white ones.
https://files.deathpenalt(...)ashRaceStudy2014.pdf
Black people are also more likely to be wrongly convicted of murder when the victim was white. Only about 15 percent of people killed by black people were white, but 31 percent of black exonorees were wrongly convicted of killing white people. More generally, black people convicted of murder are 50 percent more likely to be innocent than white people convicted of murder.
http://www.law.umich.edu/(...)gful_Convictions.pdf
Innocent black people are also 3.5 times more likely than white people to be wrongly convicted of sexual assault and 12 times more likely to be wrongly convicted of drug crimes. (And remember, data on wrongful convictions is limited in that it can only consider the wrongful convictions we know about.)
https://www.vox.com/polic(...)ocence-prison-racism
A 2000 study of federal cases found that federal prosecutors were about 50 percent more likely to offer a plea bargain to white murder suspects than black suspects that allowed them to avoid the death penalty.
https://www.washingtonpos(...)=lk_inline_manual_96
A 2006 Stanford report found that when a black person was accused of killing a white person, defendants with darker skin and more “stereotypically black” features were twice as likely to receive a death sentence. When the victim was black, there was almost no difference.
https://news.stanford.edu/news/2006/may3/deathworthy-050306.html
A 2016 study found that in Louisiana, killers of white victims were 14 times more likely to be executed than killers of black victims. Black men who killed white women were 30 times more likely to get the death penalty than black men who killed black men. Those convicted of killing white people were also less likely to have their sentences overturned on appeal, and Louisiana hasn’t executed a white person for killing a black person since 1752.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2770761
Studies in other states have produced similar results: In Oklahoma, killers of white women were 9.5 times more likely to get the death penalty than killers of minority men. In Ohio, they were 6 times more likely, and in Florida, 6.5 times more likely.
https://scholarlycommons.(...)le=7615&context=jclc
A 2017 study of about 48,000 criminal cases in Wisconsin showed that white defendants were 25 percent more likely than black defendants to have their most serious charge dismissed in a plea bargain. Among defendants facing misdemeanor charges that could carry a sentence of incarceration, whites were 75 percent more likely to have those charges dropped, dismissed or reduced to a charge that did not include such a punishment.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3036726
A 2016 review of nearly 474,000 criminal cases in Hampton Roads, Va., found that whites were more likely to get plea deals that resulted in no jail time for drug offenses. While facing charges of drug distribution, 48 percent of whites received plea bargains with no jail time, vs. 22 percent of blacks. Among those with prior criminal records who pleaded guilty to robbery, 36 percent of whites got no jail time, vs. 8 percent of blacks.
https://www.yalelawjourna(...)he-effects-of-booker
A 2013 study found that after adjusting for numerous other variables, federal prosecutors were almost twice as likely to bring charges carrying mandatory minimums against black defendants as against white defendants accused of similar crimes.
A 2008 analysis found that black defendants with multiple prior convictions are 28 percent more likely to be charged as “habitual offenders” than white defendants with similar criminal records. The authors conclude that “assessments of dangerousness and culpability are linked to race and ethnicity, even after offense seriousness and prior record are controlled.”
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.(...)79&rep=rep1&type=pdf
A 2007 Harvard study found sentencing discrepancies among black people, depending on the darkness of their skin. The study looked at 67,000 first-time felons in Georgia from 1995 to 2002. The average sentence for white men was 2,689 days. The average for black men was 378 days longer. But light-skinned blacks received sentences of about three and a half months longer than whites. Medium-skinned blacks received a sentence of about a year longer. Dark-skinned blacks received sentences of a year and a half longer.
https://scholar.harvard.e(...)merican-racial-order
A 2011 study of bail in five large U.S. counties found that blacks received $7,000 higher bail than whites for violent crimes, $13,000 higher for drug crimes and $10,000 higher for crimes related to public order. These disparities were calculated after adjusting for the seriousness of the crime, criminal history and other variables.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1990324
A 2011 investigation of presidential pardons by ProPublica found that white federal prisoners are almost four times as likely to receive a pardon than minority federal prisoners.
https://www.propublica.or(...)ons-what-can-be-done
About 16 percent of sexual assaults of white women are committed by black men, but half of the exonerations for sexual assault involve cases in which an eyewitness wrongly identified a black man for the rape of a white woman.
https://time.com/wrongly-convicted/
A study of the pardons granted in Mississippi during former governor Haley Barbour’s tenure found that although blacks make up almost two-thirds of the state’s prison population, they make up fewer than a third of the people to whom Barbour granted clemency. (It is worth noting that this isn’t about the severity of the crime — Barbour pardoned at least eight men who killed their wives or girlfriends.)
https://www.reuters.com/a(...)0120120?feedType=RSS
https://www.cbsnews.com/n(...)r-wives-girlfriends/
A 2015 county-level study of police shootings from 2011 to 2014 found “a significant bias in the killing of unarmed black Americans relative to unarmed white Americans, in that the probability of being black, unarmed, and shot by police is about 3.49 times the probability of being white, unarmed, and shot by police on average.” The study also found “no relationship between county-level racial bias in police shootings and crime rates (even race-specific crime rates), meaning that the racial bias observed in police shootings in this data set is not explainable as a response to local-level crime rates.”
https://journals.plos.org(...)journal.pone.0141854
A 2018 survey of bail practices in Miami and Philadelphia found that “bail judges are racially biased against black defendants, with substantially more racial bias among both inexperienced and part-time judges. We find suggestive evidence that this racial bias is driven by bail judges relying on inaccurate stereotypes that exaggerate the relative danger of releasing black defendants.”
https://university.pretri(...)8e9eef&forceDialog=0
Met droge ogen beweren dat institutioneel racisme niet bestaat is onmogelijk. Ik denk dat je dat aardig als "wegkijken" kan kwalificeren. En let op hè, dit is slechts een selectie.
Ah, de opinie van een Heather Lynn Mac Donald, gekend voor haar "pro-police views and her opposition to criminal justice reform".quote:
[..]
Liever niet.
https://www.wsj.com/artic(...)e-racism-11591119883
Ich glaube, dass es manchmal nicht genügend Steine gibt und
Ich bin mir sicher, dass auch schöne Augen weinen
Ich bin mir sicher, dass auch schöne Augen weinen
Paywall.quote:
[..]
Liever niet
https://www.wsj.com/artic(...)e-racism-11591119883
Wel typisch hoor. Ik kom met een reactie vol wetenschappelijke onderzoeken waar je blijkbaar geen oren naar hebt (omdat de bevindingen niet in je straatje passen), en wat zet jij ertegenover? Een opiniestuk van Heather Mac Donald*
. Serieus?
*
SPOILEROm spoilers te kunnen lezen moet je zijn ingelogd. Je moet je daarvoor eerst gratis Registreren. Ook kun je spoilers niet lezen als je een ban hebt.
[ Bericht 4% gewijzigd door Isdatzo op 04-06-2020 15:17:56 ]Huilen dan.
Jarenlange geschiedenis van eerst onderdrukking en daarna achterstelling.quote:
[..]
Mooi. Nu mag je verklaren waarom de verschillen door ras worden veroorzaakt,
Dan laat ik je eigen vraag aan jou: hoe komt het volgens jou dan dat er verschillen tussen rassen bestaan?quote:en dan ook nog dat er racisme ten grondslag aan ligt. Jij laat weer zien dat je niet snapt dat het bestaan van een verschil niet betekent dat de oorzaak racisme is. Jij geeft racisme de schuld omdat jij wil dat het racisme is. Maar zo werkt het in de echte wereld niet. Jij laat geen bewijzen van racisme zien, alleen dat er gevallen van verschillen tussen rassen bestaan. En natuurlijk enkel eenzijdig, maar dat vergeef ik je.
Huilen dan.
Toe maar.quote:
Jarenlange geschiedenis van eerst onderdrukking en daarna achterstelling.
Geen idee, maar het is dan ook niet mijn bewering dat het komt door racisme. Jij komt met een hoop conclusies, en dan mag ik naar de verklaringen zoeken? Da's wel de wetenschappelijke methode die ik van een links geörienteerd persoon verwacht. Beginnen bij de conclusie, en dan terug redeneren. Een waterdichte methode.quote:Dan laat ik je eigen vraag aan jou: hoe komt het volgens jou dan dat er verschillen tussen rassen bestaan?
Ik werd gequote en zie er niets van terug in dit topic.
Deceit for a lifetime has taken it's toll.
An emotional void, I feel numb and cold.
You're all dead to me now. And has been for long.
The time has come to reap what you've sown.
An emotional void, I feel numb and cold.
You're all dead to me now. And has been for long.
The time has come to reap what you've sown.
De verschillen worden door ras veroorzaakt?quote:
[..]
Mooi. Nu mag je verklaren waarom de verschillen door ras worden veroorzaakt, en dan ook nog dat er racisme ten grondslag aan ligt. Jij laat weer zien dat je niet snapt dat het bestaan van een verschil niet betekent dat de oorzaak racisme is. Jij geeft racisme de schuld omdat jij wil dat het racisme is. Maar zo werkt het in de echte wereld niet. Jij laat geen bewijzen van racisme zien, alleen dat er gevallen van verschillen tussen rassen bestaan. En natuurlijk enkel eenzijdig, maar dat vergeef ik je.
"Racisme bestaat niet, negers zijn gewoon afkomstig van een ras waardoor ze criminele genen hebben."
Mooie stropop.quote:
[..]
De verschillen worden door ras veroorzaakt?
"Racisme bestaat niet, negers zijn gewoon afkomstig van een ras waardoor ze criminele genen hebben."
LOL. Klaagde jij niet dat twitter politiek bedreef omdat ze niet het gehele politieke spectrum gelijk zouden behandelen? Als we jouw redenering van hierboven toepassen: nee, als twitter politieke meningen niet gelijk behandelt toont dat enkel aan dat er verschillen zijn tussen politieke meningen, het zegt niets over twitter...quote:
[..]
Mooi. Nu mag je verklaren waarom de verschillen door ras worden veroorzaakt, en dan ook nog dat er racisme ten grondslag aan ligt. Jij laat weer zien dat je niet snapt dat het bestaan van een verschil niet betekent dat de oorzaak racisme is. Jij geeft racisme de schuld omdat jij wil dat het racisme is. Maar zo werkt het in de echte wereld niet. Jij laat geen bewijzen van racisme zien, alleen dat er gevallen van verschillen tussen rassen bestaan. En natuurlijk enkel eenzijdig, maar dat vergeef ik je.
Ich glaube, dass es manchmal nicht genügend Steine gibt und
Ich bin mir sicher, dass auch schöne Augen weinen
Ich bin mir sicher, dass auch schöne Augen weinen
En de oorzaak van de ongelijke behandeling is Twitters openlijke bias.quote:
[..]
LOL. Klaagde jij niet dat twitter politiek bedreef omdat ze niet het gehele politieke spectrum gelijk zouden behandelen? Als we jouw redenering van hierboven toepassen: nee, als twitter politieke meningen niet gelijk behandelt toont dat enkel aan dat er verschillen zijn tussen politieke meningen, het zegt niets over twitter...
Welnu, wat is de oorzaak van de verschillen in Isdatzo's cijfers?
Jij hebt mijn reactie dus duidelijk niet gelezen, maar alleen aangegrepen als stok om weer eens je eigen vlag aan op te hangen.quote:
[..]
Toe maar.
[..]
Geen idee, maar het is dan ook niet mijn bewering dat het komt door racisme. Jij komt met een hoop conclusies, en dan mag ik naar de verklaringen zoeken? Da's wel de wetenschappelijke methode die ik van een links geörienteerd persoon verwacht. Beginnen bij de conclusie, en dan terug redeneren. Een waterdichte methode.
Serieus: lees mijn reactie en probeer met een andere verklaring dan "institutioneel racisme" te komen. Alleen al het verschil in de zwaarte van opgelegde gevangenisstraffen en frequentie van doodstraffen voor vergelijkbare vergrijpen is exemplarisch.
Huilen dan.
Dat is nu een vraag aan jou. Mijn antwoord weet je al.quote:
[..]
En de oorzaak van de ongelijke behandeling is Twitters openlijke bias.
Welnu, wat is de oorzaak van de verschillen in Isdatzo's cijfers?
Huilen dan.
De verschillen worden door ras verklaard?quote:
Maar als racisme uitgesloten is van de oorzaak in bijvoorbeeld de significante verhoging op kans op de doodstraf bij moord, wat is het dan wel? Wat is dan de oorzaak?
quote:
[..]
Jij hebt mijn reactie dus duidelijk niet gelezen, maar alleen aangegrepen als stok om je eigen vlag weer aan op te hangen.
Serieus: lees mijn reactie en probeer met een andere verklaring dan "institutioneel racisme" te komen. Alleen al het verschil in de zwaarte van opgelegde gevangenisstraffen en frequentie van doodstraffen voor vergelijkbare vergrijpen is exemplarisch.
Ander gedrag als ze staande worden gehouden, en zichzelf verdacht maken. Slechtere rechtsbijstand. Je moet toch echt de individuele zaken in gaan om daar een beter oordeel over te kunnen geven. Maar daar is de wortel van het probleem weer. De individuele zaken interesseren jou niet. Altijd maar weer het collectief, zodat je er dingen bij kan gooien die er niks mee te maken hebben. Het is een beetje als het versnijden van cocaine. Ach, het is niet meer puur en het product wat het hoort te zijn, maar who gives a damn, toch?quote:
[..]
Dat is nu een vraag aan jou. Mijn antwoord weet je al.
Is dat zo? Dat blijkt niet uit de post.quote:
Dat zal hoogstwaarschijnlijk verschillend zijn per zaak. Slechte rechtsbijstand, ander gedragquote:Maar als racisme uitgesloten is van de oorzaak in bijvoorbeeld de significante verhoging op kans op de doodstraf bij moord, wat is het dan wel? Wat is dan de oorzaak?
Waarom hebben zwarten slechtere rechtsbijstand? Denk je dat dat deze discrenpanties veroorzaakt?
"Ik heb nog met hem gekoerst"
Ik zelfs 2 x , maar zie ook nietsquote:
Ik werd gequote en zie er niets van terug in dit topic.
[ afbeelding ]
Ik ben inmiddels overleden
Nu ook al actief op zoek naar bronnen die hetgeen tegenspreken waarover je weigert überhaupt iets te lezen?quote:
"Pools are perfect for holding water"
Beperktere financiële middelen. Een "gratis" door de staat aangeboden advocaat heeft bijzonder weinig tijd om aan de zaak te werken. Dat gaat niet helpen met de veroordelingscijfers. Maar dat is geen teken van institutioneel racisme.quote:
Waarom hebben zwarten slechtere rechtsbijstand? Denk je dat dat deze discrenpanties veroorzaakt?
Nee, ik kwam het toevallig tegen.quote:
[..]
Nu ook al actief op zoek naar bronnen die hetgeen tegenspreken waarover je weigert überhaupt iets te lezen?
Als je enige bijdrage in dit topic je gejank richting mij is, misschien niet meer reageren hier.
Natuurlijk is racisme nog springlevend in de VS. Het is nog maar 50/60 jaar geleden dat zwarten in grote delen van de VS in een andere pot moesten pissen dan hun blanke medeburgers. Toen een zwarte vrouw voor het eerst naar een 'blanke' school ging werd daar fel tegen geprotesteerd.
Zouden de miljoenen Amerikanen die groot voorstander waren van segregatie plots van hun geloof zijn gevallen toen de regering in Washington proclameerde dat zwarte landgenoten voortaan hun gelijken zijn? Natuurlijk niet. En ze hebben ook hun kinderen vergiftigd met die manier van denken.
Racisme blijft nog wel een paar decennia een groot probleem in de VS, zo niet langer.
Zouden de miljoenen Amerikanen die groot voorstander waren van segregatie plots van hun geloof zijn gevallen toen de regering in Washington proclameerde dat zwarte landgenoten voortaan hun gelijken zijn? Natuurlijk niet. En ze hebben ook hun kinderen vergiftigd met die manier van denken.
Racisme blijft nog wel een paar decennia een groot probleem in de VS, zo niet langer.
Op maandag 3 februari 2014 08:10 schreef Enchanter het volgende:[/b]
In discussie gaan met Koos Vogels :') , een grotere mongool is er niet :r
In discussie gaan met Koos Vogels :') , een grotere mongool is er niet :r
| Forum Opties | |
|---|---|
| Forumhop: | |
| Hop naar: | |