BNW Brave New World
Samenzwering, verborgen agenda's en geheime geschiedenis. De zoektocht naar de wereld die achter de façade van alledag ligt.
Ik snap verder niet wat dit tornt aan het nucleaire principe.quote:
[ Bericht 11% gewijzigd door SuperHartje op 29-05-2019 15:18:03 ]
You should be able to read that at the beginning of my post....and then read it again before you post inane questions.quote:
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Dat hij nog steeds bijzonder weinig van dit onderwerp snapt.quote:
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Je beantwoord de vraag niet. Wat is je punt? Je begrijpt duidelijk niet waar het over gaat.quote:Op woensdag 29 mei 2019 12:54 schreef Tingo het volgende:
[..]
You should be able to read that at the beginning of my post....and then read it again before you post inane questions.
In Baden-Badener Badeseen kann man Baden-Badener baden sehen.
Als je in discussie gaat met een trol, wint hij. Als je een trol beledigt, wint hij. Als je tekeer gaat tegen een trol, wint hij. Het enige waar trollen niet tegen kunnen, is te worden genegeerd.
Probleem met uranium (bijvoorbeeld 238U) is niet de radioactiviteit, maar dat het nogal giftig is zoals alle zware metalen, vooral als het een oplosbare verbinding is.quote:
Voor de debunkies, duck and cover
In Baden-Badener Badeseen kann man Baden-Badener baden sehen.
Mastermind Tuin & Co zullen het vast kunnen weerleggen. Duck and Cover
Als je in discussie gaat met een trol, wint hij. Als je een trol beledigt, wint hij. Als je tekeer gaat tegen een trol, wint hij. Het enige waar trollen niet tegen kunnen, is te worden genegeerd.
Ben je bereid een discussie erover te voeren of ren je straks weer weg?quote:
Mastermind Tuin & Co zullen het vast kunnen weerleggen. Duck and Cover
In Baden-Badener Badeseen kann man Baden-Badener baden sehen.
En wat is je punt?quote:
Voor de debunkies, duck and cover
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Dat de Nick CopyPaste treffender was geweestquote:
In Baden-Badener Badeseen kann man Baden-Badener baden sehen.
Punterdepunt is toch niet zo lastig te vatten maar oké, fear mongering oftewel a nuclear scare scam zoals Winsor destijds al uit de doeken deed misschien moet je de man eens aanhoren kun je hem debunken. 
Als je in discussie gaat met een trol, wint hij. Als je een trol beledigt, wint hij. Als je tekeer gaat tegen een trol, wint hij. Het enige waar trollen niet tegen kunnen, is te worden genegeerd.
En hoe volgt dat uit die video?quote:
Punterdepunt is toch niet zo lastig te vatten maar oké, fear mongering oftewel a nuclear scare scam zoals Winsor destijds al uit de doeken deed misschien moet je de man eens aanhoren kun je hem debunken.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
There seems to be a lot of discussion about 'low background steel' on different forums over the last ten years or so, but it all seems a bit vague....and all seems to be discussing the exact same text/article.
When was this so-called 'low background' steel first discovered?
Who discovered 'low background' steel ?
How was 'low background' steel discovered?
Nobody seems to know.
When was the term 'low background steel' first used and by whom?
Even the references on the wiki page are vague to say the least, all have been written within the last 10 years and provide absolutely no answers to the these very simple questions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-background_steel
I was kind of hoping (certainly not expecting) that at least one or two of the self proclaimed scientistic brains on this forum would be able to help out in the discussion and provide more information. Niet dus. Ah well, never mind.
The 'low background' steel issue is about as stoopid as the 'vooral(of voornamelijk) EMP' scientistic, fearmongering bunkum. Hilarious!
Speaking of which, are there updates re: the EMP THEORY ?
When was this so-called 'low background' steel first discovered?
Who discovered 'low background' steel ?
How was 'low background' steel discovered?
Nobody seems to know.
When was the term 'low background steel' first used and by whom?
Even the references on the wiki page are vague to say the least, all have been written within the last 10 years and provide absolutely no answers to the these very simple questions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-background_steel
I was kind of hoping (certainly not expecting) that at least one or two of the self proclaimed scientistic brains on this forum would be able to help out in the discussion and provide more information. Niet dus. Ah well, never mind.
The 'low background' steel issue is about as stoopid as the 'vooral(of voornamelijk) EMP' scientistic, fearmongering bunkum. Hilarious!
Speaking of which, are there updates re: the EMP THEORY ?
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Hoe verklaar je het bestaan van zoiets eigenlijk? Zitten alle staalproducenten in de wereld in het complot, en zijn ze sinds de jaren 40 allemaal een snufje cobalt-60 aan het proces toe gaan voegen?quote:
There seems to be a lot of discussion about 'low background steel' on different forums over the last ten years or so, but it all seems a bit vague....and all seems to be discussing the exact same text/article.
When was this so-called 'low background' steel first discovered?
Who discovered 'low background' steel ?
How was 'low background' steel discovered?
Nobody seems to know.
When was the term 'low background steel' first used and by whom?
Even the references on the wiki page are vague to say the least, all have been written within the last 10 years and provide absolutely no answers to the these very simple questions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-background_steel
I was kind of hoping (certainly not expecting) that at least one or two of the self proclaimed scientistic brains on this forum would be able to help out in the discussion and provide more information. Niet dus. Ah well, never mind.
The 'low background' steel issue is about as stoopid as the 'vooral(of voornamelijk) EMP' scientistic, fearmongering bunkum. Hilarious!
Speaking of which, are there updates re: the EMP THEORY ?
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
@Tingo en @cad nieuwe serie slaan het kijken over chernobyl?
Serie geeft mooi beeld weer over wat daar gebeurt is, of... Nog beter, je kan natuurlijk ook een kijkje nemen zoals ik ooit gedaan heb 😊
Oh en mijn advies als je daar bent, negeerde waarschuwing bordjes gewoon, die slaan echt totaal nergens op.
Serie geeft mooi beeld weer over wat daar gebeurt is, of... Nog beter, je kan natuurlijk ook een kijkje nemen zoals ik ooit gedaan heb 😊
Oh en mijn advies als je daar bent, negeerde waarschuwing bordjes gewoon, die slaan echt totaal nergens op.
Er staat nog een vraag voor u open!!
It should be easy to look up for yourself, but you're either too lazy to do your own research and/or you have found precisely NOTHING to back up the 'low-background steel' bullshit.quote:
[..]
Hoe verklaar je het bestaan van zoiets eigenlijk? Zitten alle staalproducenten in de wereld in het complot, en zijn ze sinds de jaren 40 allemaal een snufje cobalt-60 aan het proces toe gaan voegen?
Anyway - I'll be kind and give you a start. Maybe you can go through the information provided on the websiites of 'the most dynamic industry associations in the world' . I've no doubt you will quite gleefully post your findings. Veel zoek plezier!
'The World Steel Association (worldsteel) is one of the largest and most dynamic industry associations in the world. worldsteel represents over 160 steel producers (including 9 of the world’s 10 largest steel companies), national and regional steel industry associations, and steel research institutes. worldsteel members represent around 85% of world steel production.'
https://www.worldsteel.or(...)+in+Figures+2018.pdf
'Six worldsteel members (ArcelorMittal, Tata Steel Europe, Tata Steel Limited, Tenaris, thyssenkrupp AG and voestalpine AG) have been recognised for their outstanding efforts in sustainability activities.'
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Jij beweert wat. Iemand vraagt daar wat over en gelijk begin je te ouwehoeren dat iemand lazy is. Wat is dit?quote:
[..]
It should be easy to look up for yourself, but you're either too lazy to do your own research and/or you have found precisely NOTHING to back up the 'low-background steel' bullshit.
Anyway - I'll be kind and give you a start. Maybe you can go through the information provided on the websiites of 'the most dynamic industry associations in the world' . I've no doubt you will quite gleefully post your findings. Veel zoek plezier!
'The World Steel Association (worldsteel) is one of the largest and most dynamic industry associations in the world. worldsteel represents over 160 steel producers (including 9 of the world’s 10 largest steel companies), national and regional steel industry associations, and steel research institutes. worldsteel members represent around 85% of world steel production.'
https://www.worldsteel.or(...)+in+Figures+2018.pdf
'Six worldsteel members (ArcelorMittal, Tata Steel Europe, Tata Steel Limited, Tenaris, thyssenkrupp AG and voestalpine AG) have been recognised for their outstanding efforts in sustainability activities.'
We blijven rondjes draaien met jou. Beantwoord de vragen en bekijk het bewijs. Wil ji jwel de waarheid weten?
Het antwoord op de belangrijkste vraag van alle vragen? 42!
Je discussieert met iemand die ontkent dat kernwapens bestaan hè, blijf dat in je achterhoofd houden.quote:
[..]
Jij beweert wat. Iemand vraagt daar wat over en gelijk begin je te ouwehoeren dat iemand lazy is. Wat is dit?
We blijven rondjes draaien met jou. Beantwoord de vragen en bekijk het bewijs. Wil ji jwel de waarheid weten?
Er is geen enkel bewijs aangeleverd wat het aannemelijk maakt dat kernwapens niet bestaan, enkel de observatie dat sommige dingen niet zijn zoals meneer verwacht - vage filmpjes en andere materie die je moet snappen om er een oordeel over te vormen.
Ik vraag naar hoe JIJ dit ziet... Wat voor verklaring JIJ hier realistisch ziet.quote:
[..]
It should be easy to look up for yourself, but you're either too lazy to do your own research and/or you have found precisely NOTHING to back up the 'low-background steel' bullshit.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Dat is waar, toch blijf ik het op een of andere manier doen.quote:
[..]
Je discussieert met iemand die ontkent dat kernwapens bestaan hè, blijf dat in je achterhoofd houden.
Het antwoord op de belangrijkste vraag van alle vragen? 42!
Je blijft ontwijken en over wat anders beginnen.quote:
[..]
It should be easy to look up for yourself, but you're either too lazy to do your own research and/or you have found precisely NOTHING to back up the 'low-background steel' bullshit.
Anyway - I'll be kind and give you a start. Maybe you can go through the information provided on the websiites of 'the most dynamic industry associations in the world' . I've no doubt you will quite gleefully post your findings. Veel zoek plezier!
'The World Steel Association (worldsteel) is one of the largest and most dynamic industry associations in the world. worldsteel represents over 160 steel producers (including 9 of the world’s 10 largest steel companies), national and regional steel industry associations, and steel research institutes. worldsteel members represent around 85% of world steel production.'
https://www.worldsteel.or(...)+in+Figures+2018.pdf
'Six worldsteel members (ArcelorMittal, Tata Steel Europe, Tata Steel Limited, Tenaris, thyssenkrupp AG and voestalpine AG) have been recognised for their outstanding efforts in sustainability activities.'
In Baden-Badener Badeseen kann man Baden-Badener baden sehen.
You posted the link to the extremely vague 'stralingsvrij staal' wiki page, which seems to be based on quite recent, dubious references. If you are satisfied with that then it is your problem.quote:Op zondag 28 april 2019 10:48 schreef Pietverdriet het volgende:
Als kernwapens niet bestaan (hebben) of tot explosie zijn gebracht, waarom is het dan onmogelijk stralingsvrij staal te produceren?
https://nl.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stralingsvrij_staal
You and your cohorts seem to believe it all despite not knowing when, where, how or by whom the so-called 'low background steel' was ever 'discovered'. It seems more likely that there was nothing to be discovered.
Please provide more info re: low background steel. Or just be honest and admit that there is fuck all info to find.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Please, for the love of -Yoink-. Answer the questions...for once...quote:
[..]
You posted the link to the extremely vague 'stralingsvrij staal' wiki page, which seems to be based on quite recent, dubious references. If you are satisfied with that then it is your problem.
You and your cohorts seem to believe it all despite not knowing when, where, how or by whom the so-called 'low background steel' was ever 'discovered'. It seems more likely that there was nothing to be discovered.
Please provide more info re: low background steel. Or just be honest and admit that there is fuck all info to find.
It seems like they can better close this topic, it's pretty disrespectfull, honestly.
Het antwoord op de belangrijkste vraag van alle vragen? 42!
Ik zou er best eens naar toe willen al staat het niet hoog op mijn verlanglijst verder zou ik me niet zo druk maken over radiation, is inmiddels een toeristische attractie geworden.
Als je in discussie gaat met een trol, wint hij. Als je een trol beledigt, wint hij. Als je tekeer gaat tegen een trol, wint hij. Het enige waar trollen niet tegen kunnen, is te worden genegeerd.
Ben je trouwens alweer vergeten dat het niet alleen staal is? Bij antieke wijn is het bijvoorbeeld ook relevant om de echtheid te bepalen:quote:
[..]
You posted the link to the extremely vague 'stralingsvrij staal' wiki page, which seems to be based on quite recent, dubious references. If you are satisfied with that then it is your problem.
You and your cohorts seem to believe it all despite not knowing when, where, how or by whom the so-called 'low background steel' was ever 'discovered'. It seems more likely that there was nothing to be discovered.
Please provide more info re: low background steel. Or just be honest and admit that there is fuck all info to find.
https://www.npr.org/secti(...)n-wine-fraud-mystery
Lood ook trouwens:
https://www.good.is/articles/the-search-for-low-background-steel
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Argument by YouTube is no argument.quote:
Ik zou er best eens naar toe willen al staat het niet hoog op mijn verlanglijst verder zou ik me niet zo druk maken over radiation, is inmiddels een toeristische attractie geworden.
Kanaal praat ook over platte aarde en is dus voor ultieme gekkies.
Het antwoord op de belangrijkste vraag van alle vragen? 42!
Niet zo druk maken over radiation?quote:
Ik zou er best eens naar toe willen al staat het niet hoog op mijn verlanglijst verder zou ik me niet zo druk maken over radiation, is inmiddels een toeristische attractie geworden.
Denk dat de Chernobyl liquidators daar wel wat anders over dachten. En er zijn wel meer voorbeelden van mensen die een te hoge stralingsdosis niet na konden vertellen:
https://en.wikipedia.org/(...)idents_and_incidents
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
In principe wel een sure-fire way om overal een complot in te vinden - gewoon "hoax" erachter zetten en op YouTube zoeken. Altijd wel een downie die het met je eens is.quote:
Ik zou er best eens naar toe willen al staat het niet hoog op mijn verlanglijst verder zou ik me niet zo druk maken over radiation, is inmiddels een toeristische attractie geworden.
Nee joh, straling is fijn en niet schadelijk. Maar ik ga nu even de was opvouwen dus ik ben er weer vandoor!!!!quote:
[..]
Niet zo druk maken over radiation?
En er zijn wel meer voorbeelden van mensen die een te hoge stralingsdosis niet na konden vertellen:
https://en.wikipedia.org/(...)idents_and_incidents
Wat ik me afvraag, als je niet gelooft in de atoombom, kernenergie en straling. Geloof je dan ook niet dat chemotherapie helpt bij mensen met kanker? En als je niet gelooft dat straling schadelijk is, waarom maak je dan wel weer druk over 5G enzo?
vragen, vragen, vragen...
vragen, vragen, vragen...
Waarom? Haha, je kan zeker geen verder info over 'low background steel' vinden dus nu wil je over MIJNE meningen weer beginnen. Paar weken terug hebben we alleen maar afleidende gezeik over meningen en feiten van je gehoord. Not to mention the idiotic cliché : 'Dat is mening, geen feit'.quote:
[..]
Ik vraag naar hoe JIJ dit ziet... Wat voor verklaring JIJ hier realistisch ziet.
Ik wil graag meer info over de low background steel claims zien - maar jij en je cohorts weten dondersgoed dat er helemaal niks meer over te vinden is.
You should be asking yourself why there isn't any basic information to be found rather than asking me my opinion. But no, you'd rather make pathetic attempts to divert the 'discussion' away from 'low background steel' because you have absolutely nothing to back up the dubious claims you believe.
The 'low background steel' subject is based on nothing more than somebody's say-so. And you know it.
Laughable, desperate, pathetic and dishonest. Echt. Nog erger dan je wazige claims over EMP.
Please provide more info re: low background steel. Or just be honest and admit that there is fuck all info to find. Then ask yourself why.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Dus volgens jou bestaat low background steel niet?quote:
[..]
Waarom? Haha, je kan zeker geen verder info over 'low background steel' vinden dus nu wil je over MIJNE meningen weer beginnen. Paar weken terug hebben we alleen maar afleidende gezeik over meningen en feiten van je gehoord. Not to mention the idiotic cliché : 'Dat is mening, geen feit'.
Ik wil graag meer info over de low background steel claims zien - maar jij en je cohorts weten dondersgoed dat er helemaal niks meer over te vinden is.
You should be asking yourself why there isn't any basic information to be found rather than asking me my opinion. But no, you'd rather make pathetic attempts to divert the 'discussion' away from 'low background steel' because you have absolutely nothing to back up the dubious claims you believe.
The 'low background steel' subject is based on nothing more than somebody's say-so. And you know it.
Laughable, desperate, pathetic and dishonest. Echt. Nog erger dan je wazige claims over EMP.
Please provide more info re: low background steel. Or just be honest and admit that there is fuck all info to find. Then ask yourself why.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Mensen geloven in een onzichtbare man in de lucht, die noemen ze God.
Maar als er een bankje staat en er staat op "pas op nat" moeten ze eerst voelen.
Dat is dus exact het probleem met straling je ziet het niet je voelt het niet je ruikt het niet.
Dus het bestaat niet.
Maar als er een bankje staat en er staat op "pas op nat" moeten ze eerst voelen.
Dat is dus exact het probleem met straling je ziet het niet je voelt het niet je ruikt het niet.
Dus het bestaat niet.
Er staat nog een vraag voor u open!!
I don't quite understand why you're asking me. It's getting a bit creepy to be honest. It's probably a shill tactic.quote:
[..]
Dus volgens jou bestaat low background steel niet?
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
One would expect that the discovery of low background steel would be very important to the steel industry, but oddly enough, there is absolutely NOTHING to be found about 'low-background steel' on any steel producer websites. There is absolutely loads of thorough, highly detailed information to be found about pretty much every type of steel known to humankind, but NOTHING about low background steel.
If low background truly exists, there would be reliable, detailed information available about it. Only a fool would believe something which totally LACKS any fundamental information. It should be re-named 'no background steel'.
The history of steel production and development is quite an interesting subject so researching it has not been a waste of time, but trying to have any sort of reasonable discussion about it here clearly is a waste of time. The shameless ignorance and dishonesty of some people here is astonishing....and weird.
Anyway....
Encyclopedia Britannica has a lot of detailed information about the history, steel types and steel production methods but mentions absolutely NOTHING about 'low-background steel'.
https://www.britannica.com/technology/steel
'The World Steel Association (worldsteel) is one of the largest and most dynamic industry associations in the world. worldsteel represents over 160 steel producers (including 9 of the world’s 10 largest steel companies), national and regional steel industry associations, and steel research institutes. worldsteel members represent around 85% of world steel production.'
'Six worldsteel members (ArcelorMittal, Tata Steel Europe, Tata Steel Limited, Tenaris, thyssenkrupp AG and voestalpine AG) have been recognised for their outstanding efforts in sustainability activities.'
https://www.worldsteel.or(...)+in+Figures+2018.pdf
No mention of low background steel.
https://corporate.arcelormittal.com/what-we-do/steel
ArcelorMittal has steelmaking facilities in 19 countries, and we are the leader in all the main steel markets.
Your search for "low background steel" returned 0 results
https://www.tatasteeleurope.com/
Tata Steel is Europe's second largest steel producer, with steelmaking in the UK and Netherlands, and manufacturing plants across Europe.
https://www.tatasteeleurope.com/en/products
Absolutely no mention of low-background steel to be found.
…...
http://www.tenaris.com/en/Products.aspx
Absolutely nothing to be found regarding 'low-background steel'.
https://www.thyssenkrupp.com/en/products/
Absolutely nothing to find about 'low-background steel'.
https://www.voestalpine.com/group/en/products/
“In its business segments, voestalpine is a globally leading technology group with a unique combination of material and processing expertise. With its top-quality products and system solutions using steel and other metals, it is a leading partner to the automotive and consumer goods industries in Europe and to the aerospace, oil and gas industries worldwide. The voestalpine Group is also the world market leader in turnout technology, special rails, tool steel, and special sections.”
http://www.voestalpine.co(...)eel&context=Products
Oh dear - still no mention of 'low-background steel'.
If low background truly exists, there would be reliable, detailed information available about it. Only a fool would believe something which totally LACKS any fundamental information. It should be re-named 'no background steel'.
The history of steel production and development is quite an interesting subject so researching it has not been a waste of time, but trying to have any sort of reasonable discussion about it here clearly is a waste of time. The shameless ignorance and dishonesty of some people here is astonishing....and weird.
Anyway....
Encyclopedia Britannica has a lot of detailed information about the history, steel types and steel production methods but mentions absolutely NOTHING about 'low-background steel'.
https://www.britannica.com/technology/steel
'The World Steel Association (worldsteel) is one of the largest and most dynamic industry associations in the world. worldsteel represents over 160 steel producers (including 9 of the world’s 10 largest steel companies), national and regional steel industry associations, and steel research institutes. worldsteel members represent around 85% of world steel production.'
'Six worldsteel members (ArcelorMittal, Tata Steel Europe, Tata Steel Limited, Tenaris, thyssenkrupp AG and voestalpine AG) have been recognised for their outstanding efforts in sustainability activities.'
https://www.worldsteel.or(...)+in+Figures+2018.pdf
No mention of low background steel.
https://corporate.arcelormittal.com/what-we-do/steel
ArcelorMittal has steelmaking facilities in 19 countries, and we are the leader in all the main steel markets.
Your search for "low background steel" returned 0 results
https://www.tatasteeleurope.com/
Tata Steel is Europe's second largest steel producer, with steelmaking in the UK and Netherlands, and manufacturing plants across Europe.
https://www.tatasteeleurope.com/en/products
Absolutely no mention of low-background steel to be found.
…...
http://www.tenaris.com/en/Products.aspx
Absolutely nothing to be found regarding 'low-background steel'.
https://www.thyssenkrupp.com/en/products/
Absolutely nothing to find about 'low-background steel'.
https://www.voestalpine.com/group/en/products/
“In its business segments, voestalpine is a globally leading technology group with a unique combination of material and processing expertise. With its top-quality products and system solutions using steel and other metals, it is a leading partner to the automotive and consumer goods industries in Europe and to the aerospace, oil and gas industries worldwide. The voestalpine Group is also the world market leader in turnout technology, special rails, tool steel, and special sections.”
http://www.voestalpine.co(...)eel&context=Products
Oh dear - still no mention of 'low-background steel'.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Wellicht ben je gewoon niet zo goed in zoeken
https://www.chemistryworl(...)teel/3009874.article
http://www.sciencemadesim(...)m-sunken-battleships
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1609.07515.pdf
https://arstechnica.com/civis/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=1120322
https://www.scmp.com/news(...)pping-rusted-warship
https://www.chemistryworl(...)teel/3009874.article
http://www.sciencemadesim(...)m-sunken-battleships
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1609.07515.pdf
https://arstechnica.com/civis/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=1120322
https://www.scmp.com/news(...)pping-rusted-warship
In Baden-Badener Badeseen kann man Baden-Badener baden sehen.
Omdat je zo vaak om dingen heen draait, en het dan handig is om duidelijk te hebben wat je mening/standpunt hierover is.quote:
[..]
I don't quite understand why you're asking me. It's getting a bit creepy to be honest. It's probably a shill tactic.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Wat ik slecht begrijp, is dat als iemand kernwapens wilt ontkennen, waarom gaat diegene dan alles eromheen proberen te debunken? Waarom niet gewoon kernwapens debunken?
No that's not true. I'm actually pretty good at finding the information I'm looking for.quote:
Wellicht ben je gewoon niet zo goed in zoeken
https://www.chemistryworl(...)teel/3009874.article
http://www.sciencemadesim(...)m-sunken-battleships
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1609.07515.pdf
https://arstechnica.com/civis/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=1120322
https://www.scmp.com/news(...)pping-rusted-warship
I read a couple of the articles you posted a few weeks ago and none of them have info regarding when, how, where and by whom 'low-background steel' was discovered. It is simple information which should be easy to find.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Anyway, I got to thinking that if such a material as low-background steel actually exists, it'd be listed on the (commodity) stock markets. Right? I'm not familiar with the stock market so maybe someone who is could find something.
American Metal Market
https://www.amm.com/Pricing/ScrapPrices_FullList.html
Nothing about low background steel to be found.
Leading provider of global metal & steel prices
https://www.metalbulletin.com/
Nothing to be found about low-background steel
More about steel prices/stock market:
http://www.metalbulletinr(...)lics-Forecaster.html
Nothing to be found about low-background steel
Popular mechanics,History of Steel:
https://www.popularmechan(...)05/history-of-steel/
Nothing to be found about low-background steel.
Conspicuous by it's absence.
The term was probably just made up only a few years ago by a bunch of dishonest scientists (or a science fiction writer) on the payroll of the atomic hoaxsters.
American Metal Market
https://www.amm.com/Pricing/ScrapPrices_FullList.html
Nothing about low background steel to be found.
Leading provider of global metal & steel prices
https://www.metalbulletin.com/
Nothing to be found about low-background steel
More about steel prices/stock market:
http://www.metalbulletinr(...)lics-Forecaster.html
Nothing to be found about low-background steel
Popular mechanics,History of Steel:
https://www.popularmechan(...)05/history-of-steel/
Nothing to be found about low-background steel.
Conspicuous by it's absence.
The term was probably just made up only a few years ago by a bunch of dishonest scientists (or a science fiction writer) on the payroll of the atomic hoaxsters.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Yep, dat jij alleen maar bevestiging zoekt is duidelijkquote:
[..]
No that's not true. I'm actually pretty good at finding the information I'm looking for.
In Baden-Badener Badeseen kann man Baden-Badener baden sehen.
Dus eerst zeg je dat je het niet kan vinden, nou plaatst iemand anders behoorlijk snel de informatie wat je zoekt en dan gooi je het op een ander slap excuus ...quote:
[..]
No that's not true. I'm actually pretty good at finding the information I'm looking for.
I read a couple of the articles you posted a few weeks ago and none of them have info regarding when, how, where and by whom 'low-background steel' was discovered. It is simple information which should be easy to find.
Ja het is makkelijk te vinden maar zodra iemand het vind bedenk je wel weer een of ander slap excuus dat de informatie incorrect onjuist of onlogisch is...
Weet je hoe ik dat noem...
.
.
.
.
.
Droevig.
Er staat nog een vraag voor u open!!
Droevig is al heel lang het juiste woord ja.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
En behalve maar blijven draaien over staal, over c14 calibratie problemen na ongeveer 1950 hoor je hem ook nietquote:
[..]
Dus eerst zeg je dat je het niet kan vinden, nou plaatst iemand anders behoorlijk snel de informatie wat je zoekt en dan gooi je het op een ander slap excuus ...
Ja het is makkelijk te vinden maar zodra iemand het vind bedenk je wel weer een of ander slap excuus dat de informatie incorrect onjuist of onlogisch is...
Weet je hoe ik dat noem...
.
.
.
.
.
Droevig.
https://nl.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Before_Present
In Baden-Badener Badeseen kann man Baden-Badener baden sehen.
Over die wijn, kunst en lood ook niet.quote:
[..]
En behalve maar blijven draaien over staal, over c14 calibratie problemen na ongeveer 1950 hoor je hem ook niet
https://nl.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Before_Present
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Onikaan ni ov dovah
Hij post zometeen weer een heel verhaal wat verder nergens op slaat of op in gaat.quote:
[..]
Over die wijn, kunst en lood ook niet.
In Baden-Badener Badeseen kann man Baden-Badener baden sehen.
https://www.good.is/articles/the-search-for-low-background-steelquote:
Anyway, I got to thinking that if such a material as low-background steel actually exists, it'd be listed on the (commodity) stock markets. Right? I'm not familiar with the stock market so maybe someone who is could find something.
American Metal Market
https://www.amm.com/Pricing/ScrapPrices_FullList.html
Nothing about low background steel to be found.
Leading provider of global metal & steel prices
https://www.metalbulletin.com/
Nothing to be found about low-background steel
More about steel prices/stock market:
http://www.metalbulletinr(...)lics-Forecaster.html
Nothing to be found about low-background steel
Popular mechanics,History of Steel:
https://www.popularmechan(...)05/history-of-steel/
Nothing to be found about low-background steel.
Conspicuous by it's absence.
The term was probably just made up only a few years ago by a bunch of dishonest scientists (or a science fiction writer) on the payroll of the atomic hoaxsters.
https://www.chemistryworl(...)teel/3009874.article
http://www.sciencemadesim(...)m-sunken-battleships
https://www.scrapmetalfor(...)-radiation-lead.html
Hoe kan je nou zo simpel zijn?
Well, as I expected (because I'd already looked it all up myself weeks ago anyway and none of the nukist-nudist camp fraternity didn't immediately post anything they could not find anyway) the information about 'low-background steel' I've been searching for has not been posted.
When, where, how and by whom it was first discovered. UNKNOWN.
The term 'low-background steel' is not acknowledged or even mentioned on the websites of any major global steel producers, corporations etc, which is unusual, as such a discovery would obviously be very important to them.
The commodity (low-background steel) is not listed on any of the worlds stock markets.....which is a surprise, as it seems that one can invest in pretty much anything and everything these days.
'Low-background steel' is not mentioned in 'The History of Steel' on general information/educative sites such as Popular Mechanics or Encyclopedia Britannica.
Conspicuous by it's absence.
Remember folks – it's often much more important what we DON'T get told/taught.
It seems the term 'low-background steel' first appeared around ten years ago on scientistic discussion forums, mainly based on the vague wiki page, but most of the articles are quite recent (within the last few years or so) and have shown up on the scientistic pages of MSM outlets .....and all follow roughly the same line...pre-'atomic', old battleships, disturbing the war graves etc., but NONE of them state any simple facts of the matter (when,where,how,who etc.)
I do like the sentimental 'disturbing-war-graves' angle though. I had two Great Grandfathers who died in France and Belgium in WWI (most likely of disease rather than german bullets or bombs), and I wouldn't be upset if a farmer wanted to use the land. Maybe I should put in a compensation claim like some people still do to this day, about WWII. Just kidding.
Anyway...
Then there's the story that NASA used 'low-background steel' bits of a battleship for the Voyager 'space-ship'. And that 'low-background steel' is used in the production of satellites.
Oh dear – depending on what your PoV is.:)
Anyway, a special thanks to Piet de Verdrietig who brought up the 'low-background steel' subject. It's been interesting to research it, although for me, the complete lack of reliable information has been even more interesting. I'd be glad to hear of any further information( re: low-background steel) from people who are genuinely interested in discussing the subject.
When, where, how and by whom it was first discovered. UNKNOWN.
The term 'low-background steel' is not acknowledged or even mentioned on the websites of any major global steel producers, corporations etc, which is unusual, as such a discovery would obviously be very important to them.
The commodity (low-background steel) is not listed on any of the worlds stock markets.....which is a surprise, as it seems that one can invest in pretty much anything and everything these days.
'Low-background steel' is not mentioned in 'The History of Steel' on general information/educative sites such as Popular Mechanics or Encyclopedia Britannica.
Conspicuous by it's absence.
Remember folks – it's often much more important what we DON'T get told/taught.
It seems the term 'low-background steel' first appeared around ten years ago on scientistic discussion forums, mainly based on the vague wiki page, but most of the articles are quite recent (within the last few years or so) and have shown up on the scientistic pages of MSM outlets .....and all follow roughly the same line...pre-'atomic', old battleships, disturbing the war graves etc., but NONE of them state any simple facts of the matter (when,where,how,who etc.)
I do like the sentimental 'disturbing-war-graves' angle though.
I had two Great Grandfathers who died in France and Belgium in WWI (most likely of disease rather than german bullets or bombs), and I wouldn't be upset if a farmer wanted to use the land. Maybe I should put in a compensation claim like some people still do to this day, about WWII. Just kidding.Anyway...
Then there's the story that NASA used 'low-background steel' bits of a battleship for the Voyager 'space-ship'. And that 'low-background steel' is used in the production of satellites.
Oh dear – depending on what your PoV is.:)
Anyway, a special thanks to Piet de Verdrietig who brought up the 'low-background steel' subject. It's been interesting to research it, although for me, the complete lack of reliable information has been even more interesting. I'd be glad to hear of any further information( re: low-background steel) from people who are genuinely interested in discussing the subject.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
Hoe bedoel je? Dat staal is er altijd al geweest, dus wat nou ontdekken? Je hebt het simpelweg over staal dat voor het bestaan van kernwapens is geproduceerd.quote:
Well, as I expected (because I'd already looked it all up myself weeks ago anyway and none of the nukist-nudist camp fraternity didn't immediately post anything they could not find anyway) the information about 'low-background steel' I've been searching for has not been posted.
When, where, how and by whom it was first discovered. UNKNOWN.
Dat er verder niemand post "what you've been searching for" lijkt me logisch, maar die reden moet je toch echt dichter bij jezelf zoeken.
