abonnement Unibet Coolblue
  donderdag 30 mei 2019 @ 23:01:23 #126
47122 ATuin-hek
theguyver's sidekick!
pi_187176075
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
  donderdag 30 mei 2019 @ 23:02:27 #127
258333 Vis1980
Veni Vidi Vissie
pi_187176092
quote:
0s.gif Op donderdag 30 mei 2019 22:41 schreef controlaltdelete het volgende:

Ik zou er best eens naar toe willen al staat het niet hoog op mijn verlanglijst verder zou ik me niet zo druk maken over radiation, is inmiddels een toeristische attractie geworden.
Argument by YouTube is no argument.

Kanaal praat ook over platte aarde en is dus voor ultieme gekkies.
Het antwoord op de belangrijkste vraag van alle vragen? 42!
  donderdag 30 mei 2019 @ 23:16:49 #128
47122 ATuin-hek
theguyver's sidekick!
pi_187176325
quote:
0s.gif Op donderdag 30 mei 2019 22:41 schreef controlaltdelete het volgende:

Ik zou er best eens naar toe willen al staat het niet hoog op mijn verlanglijst verder zou ik me niet zo druk maken over radiation, is inmiddels een toeristische attractie geworden.
Niet zo druk maken over radiation? :? Denk dat de Chernobyl liquidators daar wel wat anders over dachten.

En er zijn wel meer voorbeelden van mensen die een te hoge stralingsdosis niet na konden vertellen:
https://en.wikipedia.org/(...)idents_and_incidents
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
pi_187177142
quote:
0s.gif Op donderdag 30 mei 2019 22:41 schreef controlaltdelete het volgende:

Ik zou er best eens naar toe willen al staat het niet hoog op mijn verlanglijst verder zou ik me niet zo druk maken over radiation, is inmiddels een toeristische attractie geworden.
In principe wel een sure-fire way om overal een complot in te vinden - gewoon "hoax" erachter zetten en op YouTube zoeken. Altijd wel een downie die het met je eens is.
pi_187177150
quote:
0s.gif Op donderdag 30 mei 2019 23:16 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:

[..]

Niet zo druk maken over radiation? :? Denk dat de Chernobyl liquidators daar wel wat anders over dachten.

En er zijn wel meer voorbeelden van mensen die een te hoge stralingsdosis niet na konden vertellen:
https://en.wikipedia.org/(...)idents_and_incidents
Nee joh, straling is fijn en niet schadelijk. Maar ik ga nu even de was opvouwen dus ik ben er weer vandoor!!!!
pi_187180171
Wat ik me afvraag, als je niet gelooft in de atoombom, kernenergie en straling. Geloof je dan ook niet dat chemotherapie helpt bij mensen met kanker? En als je niet gelooft dat straling schadelijk is, waarom maak je dan wel weer druk over 5G enzo?

vragen, vragen, vragen...
pi_187184285
quote:
0s.gif Op donderdag 30 mei 2019 17:37 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:

[..]

Ik vraag naar hoe JIJ dit ziet... Wat voor verklaring JIJ hier realistisch ziet. :|W
Waarom? Haha, je kan zeker geen verder info over 'low background steel' vinden dus nu wil je over MIJNE meningen weer beginnen. Paar weken terug hebben we alleen maar afleidende gezeik over meningen en feiten van je gehoord. Not to mention the idiotic cliché : 'Dat is mening, geen feit'.

Ik wil graag meer info over de low background steel claims zien - maar jij en je cohorts weten dondersgoed dat er helemaal niks meer over te vinden is.

You should be asking yourself why there isn't any basic information to be found rather than asking me my opinion. But no, you'd rather make pathetic attempts to divert the 'discussion' away from 'low background steel' because you have absolutely nothing to back up the dubious claims you believe.

The 'low background steel' subject is based on nothing more than somebody's say-so. And you know it.

Laughable, desperate, pathetic and dishonest. Echt. Nog erger dan je wazige claims over EMP.

Please provide more info re: low background steel. Or just be honest and admit that there is fuck all info to find. Then ask yourself why.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
  vrijdag 31 mei 2019 @ 15:57:04 #133
47122 ATuin-hek
theguyver's sidekick!
pi_187184591
quote:
0s.gif Op vrijdag 31 mei 2019 15:37 schreef Tingo het volgende:

[..]

Waarom? Haha, je kan zeker geen verder info over 'low background steel' vinden dus nu wil je over MIJNE meningen weer beginnen. Paar weken terug hebben we alleen maar afleidende gezeik over meningen en feiten van je gehoord. Not to mention the idiotic cliché : 'Dat is mening, geen feit'.

Ik wil graag meer info over de low background steel claims zien - maar jij en je cohorts weten dondersgoed dat er helemaal niks meer over te vinden is.

You should be asking yourself why there isn't any basic information to be found rather than asking me my opinion. But no, you'd rather make pathetic attempts to divert the 'discussion' away from 'low background steel' because you have absolutely nothing to back up the dubious claims you believe.

The 'low background steel' subject is based on nothing more than somebody's say-so. And you know it.

Laughable, desperate, pathetic and dishonest. Echt. Nog erger dan je wazige claims over EMP.

Please provide more info re: low background steel. Or just be honest and admit that there is fuck all info to find. Then ask yourself why.
Dus volgens jou bestaat low background steel niet?
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
  zaterdag 1 juni 2019 @ 13:44:50 #134
279682 theguyver
Sidekick van A tuin-hek!
pi_187198927
Mensen geloven in een onzichtbare man in de lucht, die noemen ze God.
Maar als er een bankje staat en er staat op "pas op nat" moeten ze eerst voelen.

Dat is dus exact het probleem met straling je ziet het niet je voelt het niet je ruikt het niet.

Dus het bestaat niet.
Er staat nog een vraag voor u open!!
pi_187200290
quote:
0s.gif Op vrijdag 31 mei 2019 15:57 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:

[..]

Dus volgens jou bestaat low background steel niet?
I don't quite understand why you're asking me. It's getting a bit creepy to be honest. It's probably a shill tactic.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
pi_187200345
One would expect that the discovery of low background steel would be very important to the steel industry, but oddly enough, there is absolutely NOTHING to be found about 'low-background steel' on any steel producer websites. There is absolutely loads of thorough, highly detailed information to be found about pretty much every type of steel known to humankind, but NOTHING about low background steel.

If low background truly exists, there would be reliable, detailed information available about it. Only a fool would believe something which totally LACKS any fundamental information. It should be re-named 'no background steel'.

The history of steel production and development is quite an interesting subject so researching it has not been a waste of time, but trying to have any sort of reasonable discussion about it here clearly is a waste of time. The shameless ignorance and dishonesty of some people here is astonishing....and weird.

Anyway....
Encyclopedia Britannica has a lot of detailed information about the history, steel types and steel production methods but mentions absolutely NOTHING about 'low-background steel'.
https://www.britannica.com/technology/steel

'The World Steel Association (worldsteel) is one of the largest and most dynamic industry associations in the world. worldsteel represents over 160 steel producers (including 9 of the world’s 10 largest steel companies), national and regional steel industry associations, and steel research institutes. worldsteel members represent around 85% of world steel production.'
'Six worldsteel members (ArcelorMittal, Tata Steel Europe, Tata Steel Limited, Tenaris, thyssenkrupp AG and voestalpine AG) have been recognised for their outstanding efforts in sustainability activities.'

https://www.worldsteel.or(...)+in+Figures+2018.pdf

No mention of low background steel.

https://corporate.arcelormittal.com/what-we-do/steel
ArcelorMittal has steelmaking facilities in 19 countries, and we are the leader in all the main steel markets.
Your search for "low background steel" returned 0 results

https://www.tatasteeleurope.com/
Tata Steel is Europe's second largest steel producer, with steelmaking in the UK and Netherlands, and manufacturing plants across Europe.
https://www.tatasteeleurope.com/en/products

Absolutely no mention of low-background steel to be found.
…...
http://www.tenaris.com/en/Products.aspx

Absolutely nothing to be found regarding 'low-background steel'.

https://www.thyssenkrupp.com/en/products/

Absolutely nothing to find about 'low-background steel'.

https://www.voestalpine.com/group/en/products/
“In its business segments, voestalpine is a globally leading technology group with a unique combination of material and processing expertise. With its top-quality products and system solutions using steel and other metals, it is a leading partner to the automotive and consumer goods industries in Europe and to the aerospace, oil and gas industries worldwide. The voestalpine Group is also the world market leader in turnout technology, special rails, tool steel, and special sections.”

http://www.voestalpine.co(...)eel&context=Products

Oh dear - still no mention of 'low-background steel'.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
  zaterdag 1 juni 2019 @ 16:19:49 #137
45206 Pietverdriet
Ik wou dat ik een ijsbeer was.
  zaterdag 1 juni 2019 @ 19:11:42 #138
47122 ATuin-hek
theguyver's sidekick!
pi_187204317
quote:
0s.gif Op zaterdag 1 juni 2019 15:20 schreef Tingo het volgende:

[..]

I don't quite understand why you're asking me. It's getting a bit creepy to be honest. It's probably a shill tactic.
Omdat je zo vaak om dingen heen draait, en het dan handig is om duidelijk te hebben wat je mening/standpunt hierover is.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
pi_187204750
Wat ik slecht begrijp, is dat als iemand kernwapens wilt ontkennen, waarom gaat diegene dan alles eromheen proberen te debunken? Waarom niet gewoon kernwapens debunken? :P
pi_187206494
quote:
No that's not true. I'm actually pretty good at finding the information I'm looking for.
I read a couple of the articles you posted a few weeks ago and none of them have info regarding when, how, where and by whom 'low-background steel' was discovered. It is simple information which should be easy to find.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
pi_187206604
Anyway, I got to thinking that if such a material as low-background steel actually exists, it'd be listed on the (commodity) stock markets. Right? I'm not familiar with the stock market so maybe someone who is could find something.

American Metal Market
https://www.amm.com/Pricing/ScrapPrices_FullList.html

Nothing about low background steel to be found.

Leading provider of global metal & steel prices
https://www.metalbulletin.com/

Nothing to be found about low-background steel

More about steel prices/stock market:
http://www.metalbulletinr(...)lics-Forecaster.html

Nothing to be found about low-background steel

Popular mechanics,History of Steel:
https://www.popularmechan(...)05/history-of-steel/

Nothing to be found about low-background steel.

Conspicuous by it's absence.

The term was probably just made up only a few years ago by a bunch of dishonest scientists (or a science fiction writer) on the payroll of the atomic hoaxsters.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
  zaterdag 1 juni 2019 @ 21:10:48 #142
45206 Pietverdriet
Ik wou dat ik een ijsbeer was.
pi_187207201
quote:
0s.gif Op zaterdag 1 juni 2019 20:51 schreef Tingo het volgende:

[..]

No that's not true. I'm actually pretty good at finding the information I'm looking for.

Yep, dat jij alleen maar bevestiging zoekt is duidelijk
In Baden-Badener Badeseen kann man Baden-Badener baden sehen.
  zaterdag 1 juni 2019 @ 21:52:26 #143
279682 theguyver
Sidekick van A tuin-hek!
pi_187208524
quote:
0s.gif Op zaterdag 1 juni 2019 20:51 schreef Tingo het volgende:

[..]

No that's not true. I'm actually pretty good at finding the information I'm looking for.
I read a couple of the articles you posted a few weeks ago and none of them have info regarding when, how, where and by whom 'low-background steel' was discovered. It is simple information which should be easy to find.
Dus eerst zeg je dat je het niet kan vinden, nou plaatst iemand anders behoorlijk snel de informatie wat je zoekt en dan gooi je het op een ander slap excuus ...

Ja het is makkelijk te vinden maar zodra iemand het vind bedenk je wel weer een of ander slap excuus dat de informatie incorrect onjuist of onlogisch is...

Weet je hoe ik dat noem...
.
.
.

.

.
Droevig.
Er staat nog een vraag voor u open!!
  zaterdag 1 juni 2019 @ 21:57:07 #144
47122 ATuin-hek
theguyver's sidekick!
pi_187208611
Droevig is al heel lang het juiste woord ja.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
  zaterdag 1 juni 2019 @ 21:57:36 #145
45206 Pietverdriet
Ik wou dat ik een ijsbeer was.
pi_187208624
quote:
0s.gif Op zaterdag 1 juni 2019 21:52 schreef theguyver het volgende:

[..]

Dus eerst zeg je dat je het niet kan vinden, nou plaatst iemand anders behoorlijk snel de informatie wat je zoekt en dan gooi je het op een ander slap excuus ...

Ja het is makkelijk te vinden maar zodra iemand het vind bedenk je wel weer een of ander slap excuus dat de informatie incorrect onjuist of onlogisch is...

Weet je hoe ik dat noem...
.
.
.

.

.
Droevig.
En behalve maar blijven draaien over staal, over c14 calibratie problemen na ongeveer 1950 hoor je hem ook niet
https://nl.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Before_Present
In Baden-Badener Badeseen kann man Baden-Badener baden sehen.
  zaterdag 1 juni 2019 @ 22:39:37 #146
47122 ATuin-hek
theguyver's sidekick!
pi_187209924
quote:
1s.gif Op zaterdag 1 juni 2019 21:57 schreef Pietverdriet het volgende:

[..]

En behalve maar blijven draaien over staal, over c14 calibratie problemen na ongeveer 1950 hoor je hem ook niet
https://nl.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Before_Present
Over die wijn, kunst en lood ook niet.
Egregious professor of Cruel and Unusual Geography
Onikaan ni ov dovah
  zaterdag 1 juni 2019 @ 23:22:54 #147
45206 Pietverdriet
Ik wou dat ik een ijsbeer was.
pi_187211223
quote:
0s.gif Op zaterdag 1 juni 2019 22:39 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:

[..]

Over die wijn, kunst en lood ook niet.
Hij post zometeen weer een heel verhaal wat verder nergens op slaat of op in gaat.
In Baden-Badener Badeseen kann man Baden-Badener baden sehen.
pi_187226471
quote:
0s.gif Op zaterdag 1 juni 2019 20:54 schreef Tingo het volgende:
Anyway, I got to thinking that if such a material as low-background steel actually exists, it'd be listed on the (commodity) stock markets. Right? I'm not familiar with the stock market so maybe someone who is could find something.

American Metal Market
https://www.amm.com/Pricing/ScrapPrices_FullList.html

Nothing about low background steel to be found.

Leading provider of global metal & steel prices
https://www.metalbulletin.com/

Nothing to be found about low-background steel

More about steel prices/stock market:
http://www.metalbulletinr(...)lics-Forecaster.html

Nothing to be found about low-background steel

Popular mechanics,History of Steel:
https://www.popularmechan(...)05/history-of-steel/

Nothing to be found about low-background steel.

Conspicuous by it's absence.

The term was probably just made up only a few years ago by a bunch of dishonest scientists (or a science fiction writer) on the payroll of the atomic hoaxsters.
https://www.good.is/articles/the-search-for-low-background-steel
https://www.chemistryworl(...)teel/3009874.article
http://www.sciencemadesim(...)m-sunken-battleships
https://www.scrapmetalfor(...)-radiation-lead.html

Hoe kan je nou zo simpel zijn? :')
pi_187246762
Well, as I expected (because I'd already looked it all up myself weeks ago anyway and none of the nukist-nudist camp fraternity didn't immediately post anything they could not find anyway) the information about 'low-background steel' I've been searching for has not been posted.

When, where, how and by whom it was first discovered. UNKNOWN.

The term 'low-background steel' is not acknowledged or even mentioned on the websites of any major global steel producers, corporations etc, which is unusual, as such a discovery would obviously be very important to them.

The commodity (low-background steel) is not listed on any of the worlds stock markets.....which is a surprise, as it seems that one can invest in pretty much anything and everything these days.

'Low-background steel' is not mentioned in 'The History of Steel' on general information/educative sites such as Popular Mechanics or Encyclopedia Britannica.

Conspicuous by it's absence.
Remember folks – it's often much more important what we DON'T get told/taught.


It seems the term 'low-background steel' first appeared around ten years ago on scientistic discussion forums, mainly based on the vague wiki page, but most of the articles are quite recent (within the last few years or so) and have shown up on the scientistic pages of MSM outlets .....and all follow roughly the same line...pre-'atomic', old battleships, disturbing the war graves etc., but NONE of them state any simple facts of the matter (when,where,how,who etc.)
I do like the sentimental 'disturbing-war-graves' angle though. :) I had two Great Grandfathers who died in France and Belgium in WWI (most likely of disease rather than german bullets or bombs), and I wouldn't be upset if a farmer wanted to use the land. Maybe I should put in a compensation claim like some people still do to this day, about WWII. :) Just kidding.

Anyway...
Then there's the story that NASA used 'low-background steel' bits of a battleship for the Voyager 'space-ship'. And that 'low-background steel' is used in the production of satellites. :)
Oh dear – depending on what your PoV is.:)

Anyway, a special thanks to Piet de Verdrietig who brought up the 'low-background steel' subject. It's been interesting to research it, although for me, the complete lack of reliable information has been even more interesting. I'd be glad to hear of any further information( re: low-background steel) from people who are genuinely interested in discussing the subject.
In the new 'reality' we will be living in,nothing will be real and everything will be true-David A.McGowan
Why do some people not credit the origin of the quotes they use under their posts?- Tingo
pi_187247356
quote:
0s.gif Op maandag 3 juni 2019 22:02 schreef Tingo het volgende:
Well, as I expected (because I'd already looked it all up myself weeks ago anyway and none of the nukist-nudist camp fraternity didn't immediately post anything they could not find anyway) the information about 'low-background steel' I've been searching for has not been posted.

When, where, how and by whom it was first discovered. UNKNOWN.
Hoe bedoel je? Dat staal is er altijd al geweest, dus wat nou ontdekken? Je hebt het simpelweg over staal dat voor het bestaan van kernwapens is geproduceerd.

Dat er verder niemand post "what you've been searching for" lijkt me logisch, maar die reden moet je toch echt dichter bij jezelf zoeken. :D
abonnement Unibet Coolblue
Forum Opties
Forumhop:
Hop naar:
(afkorting, bv 'KLB')