Amerikaanse verkiezingen 2016 #39: met primaries na Super Tuesday

quote:

Op vrijdag 4 maart 2016 05:34 schreef Elfletterig het volgende:
Er zijn geen grote verschuivingen naar aanleiding van dit debat, denk ik. Wel was het een heel opzichtige poging om Trump maximaal onder vuur te nemen.

quote:

Op vrijdag 4 maart 2016 05:35 schreef Baszh het volgende:

[..]

Filmpjes en slides alleen om Trump aan te vallen. Vragen voor Trump gingen over Trump. Vragen aan anderen gingen over wat ze vonden van Trump

quote:

Op vrijdag 4 maart 2016 05:48 schreef Elfletterig het volgende:
Dit is hoe cnn.com er momenteel uitziet. Het vat eigenlijk alles wel samen:

[ afbeelding ]

quote:

Op vrijdag 4 maart 2016 06:22 schreef Elfletterig het volgende:

[..]

Om je eerste vraag te beantwoorden: ja, dat lijkt me evident hè....

De tweede vraag: ja, het was vermakelijk. Het was bij vlagen onbeschoft, er werd veel door elkaar heen geschreeuwd, er werd veel gescholden. Het was meer verbazingwekkend dan vermakelijk.

quote:

Op vrijdag 4 maart 2016 07:49 schreef Friek_ het volgende:
Donald Trump.

quote:

Op vrijdag 4 maart 2016 09:06 schreef J.B. het volgende:

Trump Responds: Look at These Hands, There - I Guarantee you There's No Problem

quote:

Op vrijdag 4 maart 2016 09:06 schreef J.B. het volgende:

Trump Responds: Look at These Hands, There - I Guarantee you There's No Problem

quote:

Op vrijdag 4 maart 2016 11:06 schreef Heilwasser het volgende:

[..]

Jep, de Amerikaanse democratie is hopeloos verloren. Ze krijgen wel wat ze verdienen.

quote:

If we woke up one day and found that the daytime sky had permanently turned from blue to orange, we’d eventually get used to it. That wouldn’t make it any less strange, however.

So even though the battle between Donald Trump and the Republican “establishment” has been a story since the summer, we should still pause now and again to gawk at the spectacle. On Thursday, Mitt Romney, the previous Republican presidential nominee and the closest thing the GOP has to a party elder, denounced Trump in the strongest possible terms. Trump responded by making what sounded to me like a blow job reference.

This is really happening. At least I think.

But as spectacular as the clash between Trump and Republican “party elites” has become, the coverage of it tends to obscure another, perhaps equally important part of the story. Trump does not just divide rank-and-file voters from Republican poo-bahs. He’s also extremely divisive among Republican voters, much more so than a typical front-runner. In exit polls so far, only 49 percent of Republican voters say they would be satisfied with Trump as their nominee — remarkable considering Trump’s lead in votes and delegates. But compounding the GOP’s problems, Marco Rubio or Ted Cruz would leave only slightly more Republican voters happy.

Sean Trende, at Real Clear Politics, wrote about these satisfaction numbers earlier, so my goal here is not to duplicate his work but to provide some additional context. Specifically, it’s to point out that what we’re seeing among the Republican electorate this year is not remotely normal.

The exit polls have asked Republican voters in seven states — here’s Tennessee, for example — whether they’d be satisfied if each of Cruz, Rubio and Trump won the nomination. Remember, these are actual voters — voters who gave Trump a win in six of the seven states where the exit poll asked this question — and not some hypothetical universe of “likely voters.” On average, just 49 percent of these actual Republican voters said they’d be satisfied with Trump. The numbers for the other two candidates were better, but not by much: 53 percent of voters said they’d be satisfied with Rubio, and 51 percent with Cruz.

You might wonder whether this sort of thing always happens during a nomination campaign. The short answer is that it doesn’t. By comparison, 79 percent of Democrats this year have said they’d be satisfied with Hillary Clinton as their nominee, while 62 percent have said so of Bernie Sanders.

Eight years ago, the battle between Clinton and Barack Obama was much tenser. With a few notable exceptions in Appalachia, however, both Clinton and Obama were widely acceptable to Democrats in 2008. On average in the 35 states where the exit polls asked the question, 69 percent of Democrats said they’d be satisfied with Obama as their nominee, while 71 percent said so of Clinton.

How about the Republican race in 2012? The exit polls posed the satisfaction question in only four states, and Romney’s numbers weren’t great. But they were still much better than Trump’s. On average, 63 percent of Republicans said they’d be happy with Romney as their nominee.

I also looked up these numbers for the 2004 Democratic and the 2008 Republican races, elections that bear some similarity to this year’s Republican race because there was no clear front-runner early on. Although it took a while for John Kerry and John McCain to catch on with voters, they eventually became very popular. In 2004, an average of 79 percent of Democrats said they’d be satisfied with Kerry as their nominee, while 77 percent of Republicans said so of McCain in 2008.

Not only is Trump’s 49 percent satisfaction rating lower than any recent party nominee’s, it’s also lower than almost all the losers’. Rick Santorum in 2012 was more widely acceptable than Trump, for example. The only exception was Ron Paul in 2012, although the exit polls asked about him in only two states.

So how is Trump winning? Partly it’s because the field is so divided, as Trende wrote. Campaign reporters perhaps ought to do more to distinguish between a candidate who is winning 34 percent of his party’s vote, as Trump has done so far, and one winning with 60 percent, as Clinton has. Clinton has a much clearer mandate than Trump does. But it’s also partly because Rubio and Cruz leave many Republicans dissatisfied. Maybe if Romney had run himself?

quote:

Op vrijdag 4 maart 2016 11:22 schreef Monolith het volgende:
Nog een aardige analyse van de 'republican voter satisfaction' die voor Trump dramatisch is, maar eigenlijk voor Rubio en Cruz nauwelijks beter:

[..]

bron met data