BNW Brave New World
Samenzwering, verborgen agenda's en geheime geschiedenis. De zoektocht naar de wereld die achter de façade van alledag ligt.
quote:Op zaterdag 16 mei 2015 18:34 schreef Lambiekje het volgende:
[..]
kortom de McDonald's etende iPadd'er is gevaarlijker dan een terroristextrimist met mitrailleurs
The only limit is your own imagination
Ik ben niet gelovig aangelegd en maak daarin geen onderscheid tussen dominees, imams, scharenslieps, autohandelaren, politici en massamedia
Waarom er geen vliegtuig in het WTC vloog
Ik ben niet gelovig aangelegd en maak daarin geen onderscheid tussen dominees, imams, scharenslieps, autohandelaren, politici en massamedia
Waarom er geen vliegtuig in het WTC vloog
quote:Op zaterdag 16 mei 2015 18:22 schreef El_Matador het volgende:
[..]
Oh, het bestáát, dan is het natuurlijk geen probleem.
Ik zeg juist dat het al duizenden jaren een probleem is.
Conscience do cost.
UK PM David Cameron Proclaims: It’s Not Enough To Follow The Law, You Must Love Big Brother
It’s not just those domestic extremists and crazy “conspiracy theory” kooks who took serious issue with UK Prime Minister David Cameron’s recent overtly fascist language when it comes to freedom of expression in Great Britain. For example, in a post published today, the UK Independent describes the quote below as “the creepiest thing David Cameron has ever said.”
BNW / Post hier BNW-strips en plaatjes #4
The measures would give the police powers to apply to the high court for an order to limit the “harmful activities” of an extremist individual. The definition of harmful is to include a risk of public disorder, a risk of harassment, alarm or distress or creating a “threat to the functioning of democracy”.
They would include a ban on broadcasting and a requirement to submit to the police in advance any proposed publication on the web and social media or in print.
It’s not just those domestic extremists and crazy “conspiracy theory” kooks who took serious issue with UK Prime Minister David Cameron’s recent overtly fascist language when it comes to freedom of expression in Great Britain. For example, in a post published today, the UK Independent describes the quote below as “the creepiest thing David Cameron has ever said.”
BNW / Post hier BNW-strips en plaatjes #4
The measures would give the police powers to apply to the high court for an order to limit the “harmful activities” of an extremist
individual. The definition of harmful is to include a risk of public disorder, a risk of harassment, alarm or distress or creating a “threat to the functioning of democracy”.They would include a ban on broadcasting and a requirement to submit to the police in advance any proposed publication on the web and social media or in print.
The only limit is your own imagination
Ik ben niet gelovig aangelegd en maak daarin geen onderscheid tussen dominees, imams, scharenslieps, autohandelaren, politici en massamedia
Waarom er geen vliegtuig in het WTC vloog
Ik ben niet gelovig aangelegd en maak daarin geen onderscheid tussen dominees, imams, scharenslieps, autohandelaren, politici en massamedia
Waarom er geen vliegtuig in het WTC vloog
Een engerd is het. Even geleden maakte ie ook al van die fraaie opmerkingen tijdens zijn UN speech.quote:Op zaterdag 16 mei 2015 18:46 schreef El_Matador het volgende:
UK PM David Cameron Proclaims: It’s Not Enough To Follow The Law, You Must Love Big Brother
It’s not just those domestic extremists and crazy “conspiracy theory” kooks who took serious issue with UK Prime Minister David Cameron’s recent overtly fascist language when it comes to freedom of expression in Great Britain. For example, in a post published today, the UK Independent describes the quote below as “the creepiest thing David Cameron has ever said.”
BNW / Post hier BNW-strips en plaatjes #4
The measures would give the police powers to apply to the high court for an order to limit the “harmful activities” of an extremist
They would include a ban on broadcasting and a requirement to submit to the police in advance any proposed publication on the web and social media or in print.
David Cameron told the U.N. that "non-violent extremism" is just as dangerous as terrorism and must be eradicated using all means at the government's disposal. He references 9/11 and 7/7 Truthers as examples of the type of extremism that must be dealt in a similar fashion to ISIS.
http://www.dailymotion.co(...)ngerous-as-isis_news
Als je in discussie gaat met een trol, wint hij. Als je een trol beledigt, wint hij. Als je tekeer gaat tegen een trol, wint hij. Het enige waar trollen niet tegen kunnen, is te worden genegeerd.
Cool, mag ik dan ook verkleed als "terrorist" nepbeelden kapotslaan in Irakese musea?quote:Op zaterdag 16 mei 2015 19:29 schreef controlaltdelete het volgende:
that must be dealt in a similar fashion to ISIS.
The only limit is your own imagination
Ik ben niet gelovig aangelegd en maak daarin geen onderscheid tussen dominees, imams, scharenslieps, autohandelaren, politici en massamedia
Waarom er geen vliegtuig in het WTC vloog
Ik ben niet gelovig aangelegd en maak daarin geen onderscheid tussen dominees, imams, scharenslieps, autohandelaren, politici en massamedia
Waarom er geen vliegtuig in het WTC vloog
als je er over nadenkt hoe fucking sneu de poppentheater wel niet is.quote:Op zaterdag 16 mei 2015 19:38 schreef El_Matador het volgende:
[..]
Cool, mag ik dan ook verkleed als "terrorist" nepbeelden kapotslaan in Irakese musea?
Everything is backwards, everything is upside down. Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, psychiatrists destroy minds, scientists destroy truth, media destroys information, religions destroy spirituality and governments destroy freedom.
Economen: 'schaf contant geld af'
Een aantal topeconomen pleiten voor de afschaffing van contant geld. Chartale valuta zouden niet meer van deze tijd zijn en alleen nog worden gebruikt voor criminele activiteiten.
De Duitse econoom Peter Bofinger pleit in het magazine De Spiegel voor de afschaffing. Hij stelt dat met de huidige technische mogelijkheden het gebruik van brief- en muntgeld een achterhaald systeem is. Hij roept tevens de Duitse regering op om het wereldwijd afschaffen van contanten op de agenda van de G7-top te zetten.
Voormalig econoom van het IMF Kenneth Rogoff hekelt zich in Handelsblatt voornamelijk aan de anonimiteit van contant geld. Zo zou het volgens hem voornamelijk worden gebruikt bij illegale transacties en belastingontduiking. Als eerste stap stelt hij voor om geen grote coupures meer uit te geven. Daarmee zou het grootste probleem zijn verholpen zo stelt hij.
Of de economen gelijk zullen krijgen is nog afwachten. Voorlopig lijkt de samenleving nog lang niet ingesteld te zijn op enkel digitale transacties. Zo zijn er bijna dagelijks storingen bij de drie grote banken ING, Rabobank en ABN-Amro en is betalen regelmatig niet mogelijk bij de betalingsverwerker iDeal. Daarbij zijn contactloze bankpassen ook een makkelijke prooi voor ciminelen die liever geld innen dan uitgeven.
Een aantal topeconomen pleiten voor de afschaffing van contant geld. Chartale valuta zouden niet meer van deze tijd zijn en alleen nog worden gebruikt voor criminele activiteiten.
De Duitse econoom Peter Bofinger pleit in het magazine De Spiegel voor de afschaffing. Hij stelt dat met de huidige technische mogelijkheden het gebruik van brief- en muntgeld een achterhaald systeem is. Hij roept tevens de Duitse regering op om het wereldwijd afschaffen van contanten op de agenda van de G7-top te zetten.
Voormalig econoom van het IMF Kenneth Rogoff hekelt zich in Handelsblatt voornamelijk aan de anonimiteit van contant geld. Zo zou het volgens hem voornamelijk worden gebruikt bij illegale transacties en belastingontduiking. Als eerste stap stelt hij voor om geen grote coupures meer uit te geven. Daarmee zou het grootste probleem zijn verholpen zo stelt hij.
Of de economen gelijk zullen krijgen is nog afwachten. Voorlopig lijkt de samenleving nog lang niet ingesteld te zijn op enkel digitale transacties. Zo zijn er bijna dagelijks storingen bij de drie grote banken ING, Rabobank en ABN-Amro en is betalen regelmatig niet mogelijk bij de betalingsverwerker iDeal. Daarbij zijn contactloze bankpassen ook een makkelijke prooi voor ciminelen die liever geld innen dan uitgeven.
Op maandag 24 augustus 2015 11:34 schreef Yasmin23 het volgende:
Als je maar genoeg moeite doet past alles.
_____
TV / Het post-apocalyptische/dystopische film topic
Als je maar genoeg moeite doet past alles.
_____
TV / Het post-apocalyptische/dystopische film topic
Het gaat natuurlijk gewoon om controle nu de rente op spaargeld steeds lager wordt en men straks waarschijnlijk moet gaan betalen om geld op de bank te hebben. Mensen halen hun geld van de bank en dan heeft de overheid er geen oog meer op. Dat moet voorkomen worden.quote:
Economen: 'schaf contant geld af'
Een aantal topeconomen pleiten voor de afschaffing van contant geld. Chartale valuta zouden niet meer van deze tijd zijn en alleen nog worden gebruikt voor criminele activiteiten.
De Duitse econoom Peter Bofinger pleit in het magazine De Spiegel voor de afschaffing. Hij stelt dat met de huidige technische mogelijkheden het gebruik van brief- en muntgeld een achterhaald systeem is. Hij roept tevens de Duitse regering op om het wereldwijd afschaffen van contanten op de agenda van de G7-top te zetten.
Voormalig econoom van het IMF Kenneth Rogoff hekelt zich in Handelsblatt voornamelijk aan de anonimiteit van contant geld. Zo zou het volgens hem voornamelijk worden gebruikt bij illegale transacties en belastingontduiking. Als eerste stap stelt hij voor om geen grote coupures meer uit te geven. Daarmee zou het grootste probleem zijn verholpen zo stelt hij.
Of de economen gelijk zullen krijgen is nog afwachten. Voorlopig lijkt de samenleving nog lang niet ingesteld te zijn op enkel digitale transacties. Zo zijn er bijna dagelijks storingen bij de drie grote banken ING, Rabobank en ABN-Amro en is betalen regelmatig niet mogelijk bij de betalingsverwerker iDeal. Daarbij zijn contactloze bankpassen ook een makkelijke prooi voor ciminelen die liever geld innen dan uitgeven.
Banken en overheden krijgen zo ook de totale macht over geld. Ben je een vervelende burger dan worden je rekeningen gewoon bevroren.quote:
[..]
Het gaat natuurlijk gewoon om controle nu de rente op spaargeld steeds lager wordt en men straks waarschijnlijk moet gaan betalen om geld op de bank te hebben. Mensen halen hun geld van de bank en dan heeft de overheid er geen oog meer op. Dat moet voorkomen worden.
Op maandag 24 augustus 2015 11:34 schreef Yasmin23 het volgende:
Als je maar genoeg moeite doet past alles.
_____
TV / Het post-apocalyptische/dystopische film topic
Als je maar genoeg moeite doet past alles.
_____
TV / Het post-apocalyptische/dystopische film topic
Totale controle.quote:
[..]
Banken en overheden krijgen zo ook de totale macht over geld. Ben je een vervelende burger dan worden je rekeningen gewoon bevroren.
Of ouderwetse ruilhandel wordt weer populairquote:
.
Op maandag 24 augustus 2015 11:34 schreef Yasmin23 het volgende:
Als je maar genoeg moeite doet past alles.
_____
TV / Het post-apocalyptische/dystopische film topic
Als je maar genoeg moeite doet past alles.
_____
TV / Het post-apocalyptische/dystopische film topic
Venus Project wordt weer van stal gehaald.quote:
[..]
Of ouderwetse ruilhandel wordt weer populair
En wat vind je van het Venus project?quote:
[..]
Venus Project wordt weer van stal gehaald.
There is only one religion
jomanda talkquote:
[..]
En wat vind je van het Venus project?
Everything is backwards, everything is upside down. Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, psychiatrists destroy minds, scientists destroy truth, media destroys information, religions destroy spirituality and governments destroy freedom.
Oom agent is je beste vriend.
Everything is backwards, everything is upside down. Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, psychiatrists destroy minds, scientists destroy truth, media destroys information, religions destroy spirituality and governments destroy freedom.
lunchbox inspection!
Teachers can confiscate and KEEP pupils' unhealthy food under government rules for lunchbox inspections.
Ministers say schools can 'confiscate, keep or destroy' items from children
Suggest having two teachers and the pupil present for lunchbox searches
Schools told to 'seek legal advice' if worried about their food policy
Follows rows over scotch eggs, Peperamis and cereal bars being taken.
By MATT CHORLEY, POLITICAL EDITOR FOR MAILONLINE
PUBLISHED: 08:51 GMT, 1 July 2015 | UPDATED: 17:54 GMT, 1 July 2015
A member of staff may confiscate, keep or destroy such items found as a result of the search if it is reasonable to do so
Education minister Lord Nash
Teachers are free to take - and keep - any item from pupils' lunchboxes if they think they are unhealthy or inappropriate, the government has said.
Parents were outraged last month when it emerged children had scotch eggs and a Peperami confiscated under health eating policies.
Now ministers have backed the move, giving staff freedom to 'confiscate, keep or destroy' anything deemed to break school policies and setting out the procedure for carrying out lunchbox inspections.
The row over packed lunches erupted after Cherry Tree Primary School, in Colchester, banned junk food from packed lunches.
Outraged parents said it was unfair as the school's menu offers unhealthy food including high sugar desserts like flapjacks, cookies and mousse.
Vikki Laws, of Colchester, said her daughter Tori, six, was not allowed to eat her Peperami sausage snack, which was confiscated and only returned at the end of the day with a note from teachers.
She said another parent was also told her child was not allowed to have scotch eggs in her lunch box.
Parents were also in uproar after Manley Park Primary School in Manchester banned healthy snacks such as cereal bars from children's packed lunches - despite offering pizza, chocolate fudge cake and fish fingers on its lunch menu.
Two mothers claimed staff confiscated a nut cereal bar and a packet of 100 per cent fruit chews because of their 'hidden sugar'.
It reignited the debate about the quality of school meals, at a time when NHS chiefs have warned obesity is the biggest threat to the nation's health.
But the Department for Education has backed the move, insisting schools are free to ban whatever they like from lunchboxes.
Governing bodies can decide whether to 'ban certain products to promote healthy eating'.
Schools are urged to consult parents first to 'ensure that any adopted policy is clearly communicated to parents and pupils'.
But education minister Lord Nash added: 'Schools have common law powers to search pupils, with their consent, for items.
'There is nothing to prevent schools from having a policy of inspecting lunch boxes for food items that are prohibited under their school food policies.
'A member of staff may confiscate, keep or destroy such items found as a result of the search if it is reasonable to do so in the circumstances.'
In response to a parliamentary question, he set out how a search of a lunchbox could be carried out and who should be witnesses.
'It would be good practice for the pupil to be present during an inspection and for a second member of staff to be present if any items are to be confiscated.
'If authorities and schools are concerned about their legal position, they should seek their own legal advice.'
Iain Austin, a Labour member of the education select committee, said: ‘With Britain tumbling down the international league tables and with a generation entering the work force with less literacy and numeracy than the generation retiring, you would have thought that teachers might have better things to do than rummaging through children’s crisps and fruit.’
Ukip MP Douglas Carswell said: ‘The Department for Education really must be missing Michael Gove. They are resorting to the kind of nanny state stunts that you would have expected from Tony Blair’s Labour government 15 years ago.
‘It should be entirely up to schools and there is something sinister this. Government should get out of people’s lunchboxes and focus on trying to fix the big things like immigration and the deficit.’
Official figures show that around 20 per cent of children aged four and five in reception classes are classed as overweight.
But the figure rises to around 33 per cent among Year 6 children by the time they leave primary school.
http://www.dailymail.co.u(...)box-inspections.html
Lees vooral ook de comments onder dit artikel
Teachers can confiscate and KEEP pupils' unhealthy food under government rules for lunchbox inspections.
Ministers say schools can 'confiscate, keep or destroy' items from children
Suggest having two teachers and the pupil present for lunchbox searches
Schools told to 'seek legal advice' if worried about their food policy
Follows rows over scotch eggs, Peperamis and cereal bars being taken.
By MATT CHORLEY, POLITICAL EDITOR FOR MAILONLINE
PUBLISHED: 08:51 GMT, 1 July 2015 | UPDATED: 17:54 GMT, 1 July 2015
A member of staff may confiscate, keep or destroy such items found as a result of the search if it is reasonable to do so
Education minister Lord Nash
Teachers are free to take - and keep - any item from pupils' lunchboxes if they think they are unhealthy or inappropriate, the government has said.
Parents were outraged last month when it emerged children had scotch eggs and a Peperami confiscated under health eating policies.
Now ministers have backed the move, giving staff freedom to 'confiscate, keep or destroy' anything deemed to break school policies and setting out the procedure for carrying out lunchbox inspections.
The row over packed lunches erupted after Cherry Tree Primary School, in Colchester, banned junk food from packed lunches.
Outraged parents said it was unfair as the school's menu offers unhealthy food including high sugar desserts like flapjacks, cookies and mousse.
Vikki Laws, of Colchester, said her daughter Tori, six, was not allowed to eat her Peperami sausage snack, which was confiscated and only returned at the end of the day with a note from teachers.
She said another parent was also told her child was not allowed to have scotch eggs in her lunch box.
Parents were also in uproar after Manley Park Primary School in Manchester banned healthy snacks such as cereal bars from children's packed lunches - despite offering pizza, chocolate fudge cake and fish fingers on its lunch menu.
Two mothers claimed staff confiscated a nut cereal bar and a packet of 100 per cent fruit chews because of their 'hidden sugar'.
It reignited the debate about the quality of school meals, at a time when NHS chiefs have warned obesity is the biggest threat to the nation's health.
But the Department for Education has backed the move, insisting schools are free to ban whatever they like from lunchboxes.
Governing bodies can decide whether to 'ban certain products to promote healthy eating'.
Schools are urged to consult parents first to 'ensure that any adopted policy is clearly communicated to parents and pupils'.
But education minister Lord Nash added: 'Schools have common law powers to search pupils, with their consent, for items.
'There is nothing to prevent schools from having a policy of inspecting lunch boxes for food items that are prohibited under their school food policies.
'A member of staff may confiscate, keep or destroy such items found as a result of the search if it is reasonable to do so in the circumstances.'
In response to a parliamentary question, he set out how a search of a lunchbox could be carried out and who should be witnesses.
'It would be good practice for the pupil to be present during an inspection and for a second member of staff to be present if any items are to be confiscated.
'If authorities and schools are concerned about their legal position, they should seek their own legal advice.'
Iain Austin, a Labour member of the education select committee, said: ‘With Britain tumbling down the international league tables and with a generation entering the work force with less literacy and numeracy than the generation retiring, you would have thought that teachers might have better things to do than rummaging through children’s crisps and fruit.’
Ukip MP Douglas Carswell said: ‘The Department for Education really must be missing Michael Gove. They are resorting to the kind of nanny state stunts that you would have expected from Tony Blair’s Labour government 15 years ago.
‘It should be entirely up to schools and there is something sinister this. Government should get out of people’s lunchboxes and focus on trying to fix the big things like immigration and the deficit.’
Official figures show that around 20 per cent of children aged four and five in reception classes are classed as overweight.
But the figure rises to around 33 per cent among Year 6 children by the time they leave primary school.
http://www.dailymail.co.u(...)box-inspections.html
Lees vooral ook de comments onder dit artikel
There is only one religion
wat een verschil met rusland, in rusland hebben ze dienstbaarheid hoog in het vaandel staanquote:
Voor het artikel in de moscow times
http://www.themoscowtimes(...)attalion/524833.html
There is only one religion
welkom in ultrafascistisch Nederland.quote:Nederland is kampioenland afluisteren. Toch is dat niet goed genoeg. De Nederlandse Geheime Dienst (AIVD) en hun militaire collega MIVD, willen de bevoegdheid alle telefonie en alle data (zoals internet) in Nederland ongericht te mogen aftappen, analyseren en archiveren. En dat ‘recht’ gaan ze zich nu dus toe-eigenen. Op die manier worden ze minder afhankelijk van de VS en onze buurlanden om Nederlanders in Nederland ongericht af te luisteren. Ook Nederland moet totalitair, dat is wel zo gemakkelijk.
bron
En zie wat de politie ondertussen doet met mensen die grapjes maken je wordt gedood door oom agent.
Everything is backwards, everything is upside down. Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, psychiatrists destroy minds, scientists destroy truth, media destroys information, religions destroy spirituality and governments destroy freedom.
Vanaf donderdag.quote:Wordt online vakantiekiekje met Eiffeltoren strafbaar?
Wie tijdens zijn vakantie graag foto’s maakt van openbare monumenten als de Eiffeltoren, reuzenrad London Eye of de Sagrada Familia in Barcelona, kan die binnenkort misschien niet meer zomaar op internet zetten. Het Europees parlement stemt op 9 juli over een wet die het auteursrecht voor de hele Europese Unie moet regelen, en die nieuwe wet is een stuk strenger dan de Nederlandse.
De Nederlandse Auteurswet uit 1912 zegt dat er auteursrecht rust op kunstwerken in de openbare ruimte - denk aan het beeld van Zadkine in Rotterdam, of aan het Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam - maar bevat ook een artikel dat het fotograferen ervan toestaat. Als de nieuwe wet door het Europees parlement komt, dan vervalt onze eigen wet en gelden voortaan de Brusselse regels.
[..]
Als de nieuwe wet wordt aangenomen op 9 juli, dan zullen vergelijkbare problemen zich waarschijnlijk ook in ons land voordoen. Ook Duitsland, waar de regels vergelijkbaar zijn met die uit Nederland, maakt zich zorgen, schrijft de Frankfurter Allgemeine vandaag in een artikel. "Nog drie weken om het panoramarecht in Europa te redden", kopte een artikel van Wikipedia's online krant The Signpost vorige week al.
bron
Everything is backwards, everything is upside down. Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, psychiatrists destroy minds, scientists destroy truth, media destroys information, religions destroy spirituality and governments destroy freedom.
... en als ze niet bij data kunnen ben je nog strafbaar ook dat je encrypt.quote:
Handig toch dat google?
http://daskapital.nl/2015/07/nsa_heeft_gewoon_google_voor_p.html
Everything is backwards, everything is upside down. Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, psychiatrists destroy minds, scientists destroy truth, media destroys information, religions destroy spirituality and governments destroy freedom.
Leuk dat niet-zelf rijden maar als een ongeluk onvermijdbaar is dan zie ik toch liever dat je zelf de controle over de uitkomst hebt en niet omdat de andere partij de koning, celeb of bus met schoolkinderen is.quote:Self-driving cars may have to be programmed to kill you
The self-driving cars that could soon dominate our roads, perhaps even making human-driven ones illegal some day, could end up being programmed to kill you if it means saving a larger number of lives.
This is routed in a classic philosophical thought experiment, the Trolley Problem.
Consider this:
'There is a runaway trolley barrelling down the railway tracks. Ahead, on the tracks, there are five people tied up and unable to move. The trolley is headed straight for them. You are standing some distance off in the train yard, next to a lever. If you pull this lever, the trolley will switch to a different set of tracks. However, you notice that there is one person on the side track. You have two options: 1. Do nothing, and the trolley kills the five people on the main track or 2. Pull the lever, diverting the trolley onto the side track where it will kill one person. Which is the correct choice?'
Though the whole point of driverless cars is that they are better at avoiding accidents than humans, there will still be times when a collision is unavoidable. As such, it is conceivable that whoever programmes them will decide that ploughing you into a road barrier is better than continuing your course into a bus packed with school children.
"Utilitarianism tells us that we should always do what will produce the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people," said UAVB and Oxford University scholar and bioethics expert Ameen Barghi, with this approach advising that changing course to reduce loss of life is the right thing to do.
Deontologists however, argue that "some values are simply categorically always true.
"For example, murder is always wrong, and we should never do it," Barghi continued, so "even if shifting the trolley will save five lives, we shouldn't do it because we would be actively killing one," with the same going for a self-driving car situation.
As technology and AI advances these unsolved philosophical and ethical problems are only going to become more urgent and political, and as it stands, future tech appears to be advancing a lot faster than useful debate about how best to implement it.
bron
Ik voorzie wel dat je een zelfrijdende autos kan gaan kopen/huren waarbij een kudos systeem gebruikt wordt.
Everything is backwards, everything is upside down. Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, psychiatrists destroy minds, scientists destroy truth, media destroys information, religions destroy spirituality and governments destroy freedom.
Hoe absurd gaat het worden allemaal.quote:Leaked Documents Show FBI, DEA, & Army Can Control Your Computer
Leaked emails from an Italian-based hacking company reveal that government agencies engage in surveillance more invasive than previously thought, spending millions of dollars on spyware and malware software to accomplish their questionable goals. Tellingly, their use of the product places them squarely in the same category as other repressive regimes around the world.
After hackers ironically hacked Hacking Tools, a Milan-based company that sells strictly to governments, hundreds of gigabytes of emails and financial records were leaked. The emails show that the FBI, DEA, and U.S. Army all purchased software that enables them to view suspects’ photos, emails, listen to and record their conversations, and activate the cameras on their computers, among other things.
While this may seem like old news, the most controversial revelation was the government’s purchases of “Remote Control Systems.” The FBI, DEA, and U.S. Army, courtesy of Hacking Tools, possess the capability to take control of a suspect’s computer screen. The technology is so invasive that even the DEA, known for its violative surveillance policies, had reservations about purchasing it.
According to documents obtained by The Intercept, an internal request to purchase RCS was denied by DEA management in 2011 because it was “too controversial.” By 2012, however, the DEA had resolved its concerns, likely spending a similar amount to the $773,226.64 (plus thousands in maintenance fees) the FBI invested in its own set of software.
bron
Everything is backwards, everything is upside down. Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, psychiatrists destroy minds, scientists destroy truth, media destroys information, religions destroy spirituality and governments destroy freedom.
We leven toch in de middeleeuwen. Over 100 jaar vinden ze ons allemaal stapelmesjokke. "Maar zo ging dat in die tijd..."quote:
[..]
Hoe absurd gaat het worden allemaal.
Nadia, this tea is excellent!
quote:Bill Gates' Temporary Sterilization Microchip In Beta Female Testing By End of Year
"Her-RA for the Brave New World!"
By Heather Callaghan
Earlier this week, I wrote about a deal reached that would soon be pumping out medical microchip implants. Meet the new face of medicine that polygamously marries Big Pharma, biotech, nanotech and wireless remote technology. Maybe hooking oneself into the Internet of Things will be an additional app, although this sounds like a passive form of medicine where someone else gets to call the shots, so to speak.
The same developers who are bringing wireless remotely controlled microchip implants are actually focusing on their first flagship product: Gates Foundation-funded birth-control microchip implants. Wireless technology allows the remotely controlled chip to turn a woman's ability to conceive off or on at will - temporary sterilization. Of course with remote technology funded by eugenics depopulation fanatics, the first questions should always be, "the ability to conceive by whose will?" This would be the complete antithesis of female empowerment or a "woman's right to choose" - would it not?
The encryption is alleged to be so safe, that cyberhackers cannot break entry - that means you too.
The chip can be implanted into the hip, arms or beneath the back. Mum was the word during the last few years of development until it was finally publicly confirmed that the beta testing for the birth control chip would be starting towards the end of this year. Indeed, human volunteers will be sought for real-life chip testing.
TWCN Tech News reports more details on the microchip birth-control implant:
The birth control chip is the brain child of a professor, Robert Langer, from Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Bill Gates and Melinda foundation has funded the research and the prototype is ready for human testing. The chips will be ready for sale by the year 2018 according to Robert Langer. The institute’s Chip Foundation and Bill Gates’ foundation have been working on the birth control chip for past three years.
The chip’s size is 20mm by 20mm by 7mm. The reservoirs of hormones would be stored on a microchip of 1.5cm. The chip’s data would always be encrypted so that others (cybercriminals or hackers) cannot access the information contained in the chip or misuse/alter or destroy it.
[...]
The release of hormones will be done by melting a part of solid hormonal stock using a small electric shock which won’t be noticed by humans.
[...]
The safety tests would begin by the end of year 2015 and Robert Langer is confident that the chips will hit market sometime in 2018.
As usual, "The main target" for the testing phase of the chips are women in third-world countries. That means African and Indian women will be human guinea pigs, subject to more of Gates' destructive horrors, like paralyzing nearly 50,000 Indian children with his polio vaccine tests. Or deaths/paralysis in Pakistan and more paralysis in Africa. But, I'm sure they will go back and make sure those women can conceive again, right? No one is admitting who is actually in control of the wireless capabilities of the implant that is allegedly impenetrable by hackers. Who does a woman see to have her ability to conceive turned back on? That would be an important piece of information, correct?
Interestingly, this news came right on the heels of New Zealand academic higher-ups seriously suggesting the temporary sterilization of all young teen girls - at least in New Zealand.
Brave New World much?
Headlines were simply calling it "free contraception" and recommending the temporary chemical shutting off of young female fertility for society's sake. No thought whatsoever to looking to solve the source of "the problem" if it even should be looked at so harshly, or to the health of developing teen girls. And just like Gates' moves in India, no real thoughts go to solving issues of impoverishment which historically, lead to blooming birth rates and medical birth issues. Why better people's lives when there is so much control in remotely and wirelessly deciding if a woman can conceive?
Pregnancy costs too much....it's inconvenient...it's bad for mother and child, and other dehumanizing reasons were given. Ethics, compulsory slippery slopes and STD concerns aside, critics zeroed in on health and environment concerns regarding chemicals. Isn't it convenient that Gates' birth-control microchip should launch to save the world from those critiques? Who needs artificial hormones when wireless voltage and gold are there to alchemically or A.I.-chemically create "an artificial organ" through biotech, according to one of its developers. This is where Woman meets Machine to reproduce. Now there is no reason to protest - temporary sterilization for all!
How is that for female empowerment? It requires permission...
This writer's sentiments align with the anti-eugenics op-ed piece by Leading Edge, that said:
For me, one of the most troubling aspects of this proposal is the way in which it so flippantly treats normal healthy female fertility as if it were something that needs to be shut down or medicated against – like we would a disease, or some other physiological problem.
Indeed, is the human body really worth altering to the point of switching on and off like it's an inconvenient afterthought? Why go against who you are - you are not a disease. At least you deserve to be thought of as a glorious human being, and not something to be eradicated. Worse yet, why let someone else take the wheel from a remote location?
A person who was demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it.
|
|
