NWS Nieuws & Achtergronden
Discussieer hier diepgaander over de actualiteiten.
De tickets zijn geregeld door een Iranier
http://www.dailymail.co.u(...)d-never-boarded.htmlquote:'One of two men who boarded doomed Air Malaysia flight on a stolen passport looked like Mario Balotelli': Authorities reveal key clue as they hunt Mr Ali, mystery Iranian businessman who booked their tickets
Dat kan er wel voor zorgen dat ze minder centen verdienen, juist omdat mensen iets goedkopers prefereren en ze misschien vaak niet de goedkoopste zijn.quote:Op maandag 10 maart 2014 19:43 schreef U.N.K.L.E. het volgende:
[..]
Veel mensen zeker. Maar dat doet toch niets af aan wat ik zeg? Malaysia Airlines is namelijk vaak helemaal niet duurder dan bijvoorbeeld KLM. Ik vlieg vaak met Malaysia Airlines (AMS - HAN), en boek toch daar puur voor kwaliteit en miles. Ik denk dat een goede airline als Malaysia Airlines of Singapore Airlines een voldoende goede positie hebben om sterk te blijven, al wordt de concurrentie wel steeds groter (vooral op korte vluchten).
Wordt het natquote:
Wat gebeurt er als een vliegtuig zich met de neus in het water boort?
Het is...kiezen of delen, spelen winnen verliezen of vervelen en helemaal niets ondernemen
Dat klopt, de concurrentie wordt sterker, maar dat is dus vooral op korte vluchten (zeker in azie heb je veel prijsvechters als Air Asia en Jetstar). Voor de lange vluchten doet MA gewoon mee met de andere grote maatschappijen, ook qua prijs.quote:
[..]
Dat kan er wel voor zorgen dat ze minder centen verdienen, juist omdat mensen iets goedkopers prefereren en ze misschien vaak niet de goedkoopste zijn.
Ze keek me smerig aan ik vond 'm zelf nog zo subtiel
maar ze kon ze niet waarderen, grappen over Tsjernobyl
maar ze kon ze niet waarderen, grappen over Tsjernobyl
Mario Balotelli, dan moet het een flink zwarte Iranier zijn geweest aan boord (ervan uitgaand dat de passagiers net als de touroperator Perzen waren).quote:
De tickets zijn geregeld door een Iranier
[..]
http://www.dailymail.co.u(...)d-never-boarded.html
Of een Pakistani/Indier? Kunnen ook bijna neger zijn.
The only limit is your own imagination
Ik ben niet gelovig aangelegd en maak daarin geen onderscheid tussen dominees, imams, scharenslieps, autohandelaren, politici en massamedia
Waarom er geen vliegtuig in het WTC vloog
Ik ben niet gelovig aangelegd en maak daarin geen onderscheid tussen dominees, imams, scharenslieps, autohandelaren, politici en massamedia
Waarom er geen vliegtuig in het WTC vloog
https://imageshack.com/i/mao7vajquote:
[..]
op een meter of 30-100 wordt het problematisch geloof ik. Verder mag ik aannemen dat het lokale leger goed op de hoogte is met wat er rondvliegt in de buurt van land. Ergens onopvallend geland zijn kan niet denk ik?
Ze zoeken echter ook aan de west thaise kust dus misschien dat er toch gaten in zitten?
Haters everywhere but I don't really care.
Ah, een Iraanse tussenpersoon dus, in plaats van twee Iraanse passagiers.quote:
De tickets zijn geregeld door een Iranier
[..]
http://www.dailymail.co.u(...)d-never-boarded.html
Ik denk meer dode artiesten dan terroristen.quote:
Het lijkt me toch wel een optie dat de piloot alles heeft uitgezet en met de neus naar beneden het vliegtuig heeft laten vallen. Misschien de copiloot die was 27 een leeftijd waarin ook veel terroristen zitten.
Het is...kiezen of delen, spelen winnen verliezen of vervelen en helemaal niets ondernemen
Copiloot had geen ervaring met dit toestel.
CNN) -- The first officer aboard Malaysia Airlines MH370 when it disappeared early Saturday from radar was transitioning to work on the Boeing 777-200.
Fariq Ab Hamid, a 27-year-old Malaysian, helped fly the plane from Hong Kong to Kuala Lumpur, where he landed it under the supervision of a senior pilot as well as a safety captain, according to CNN aviation correspondent Richard Quest, who was also in the cockpit.
The network was shooting video of the landing for use in a "CNN Business Traveler" program.
"It was interesting to watch the way he brought the aircraft in to land," Quest recalled about the February 19 landing, which the captain described as textbook-perfect.
Questions swirl after airliner vanishes
Are flight recorders 'antiquated?'
International crews search for plane
Hamid, who has 2,763 flying hours, joined Malaysia Airlines in 2007. He had been flying another jet and was transitioning to the Boeing 777-200 after having completed training in a flight simulator.
The airline's first officers are trained to the same standards as the captains, Quest said he was told by airline officials. "The captain was very much in control, but the first officer was flying the aircraft."
The missing plane was piloted by Capt. Zaharie Ahmad Shah, a 53-year-old Malaysian with 18,365 flying hours who joined the airline in 1981.
http://edition.cnn.com/20(...)lines-first-officer/
CNN) -- The first officer aboard Malaysia Airlines MH370 when it disappeared early Saturday from radar was transitioning to work on the Boeing 777-200.
Fariq Ab Hamid, a 27-year-old Malaysian, helped fly the plane from Hong Kong to Kuala Lumpur, where he landed it under the supervision of a senior pilot as well as a safety captain, according to CNN aviation correspondent Richard Quest, who was also in the cockpit.
The network was shooting video of the landing for use in a "CNN Business Traveler" program.
"It was interesting to watch the way he brought the aircraft in to land," Quest recalled about the February 19 landing, which the captain described as textbook-perfect.
Questions swirl after airliner vanishes
Are flight recorders 'antiquated?'
International crews search for plane
Hamid, who has 2,763 flying hours, joined Malaysia Airlines in 2007. He had been flying another jet and was transitioning to the Boeing 777-200 after having completed training in a flight simulator.
The airline's first officers are trained to the same standards as the captains, Quest said he was told by airline officials. "The captain was very much in control, but the first officer was flying the aircraft."
The missing plane was piloted by Capt. Zaharie Ahmad Shah, a 53-year-old Malaysian with 18,365 flying hours who joined the airline in 1981.
http://edition.cnn.com/20(...)lines-first-officer/
Ik zit na te denken over die mogelijkheid dat het mensensmokkel is en vluchtelingen.
Waarom zou je dan op een als paspoort op 3 of 4 vliegvelden de gok nemen bij de immigratie? 3 als je bij aankomst in Frankfurt/Kopenhagen niet gecontroleerd wordt omdat je al vanuit binnen Schengen (Schiphol) vliegt.
Lijkt me veel teveel risico, met een vals paspoort juist naar Nederland waar een Italiaans en Oostenrijks paspoort toch echt wel grondig onderzocht worden en die "Balotelli" en "Jorg Haider" zitten dan lekker in een Schipholasielcel en niet op een zonnig terrasje in Duitsland of Denemarken...
Waarom zou je dan op een als paspoort op 3 of 4 vliegvelden de gok nemen bij de immigratie? 3 als je bij aankomst in Frankfurt/Kopenhagen niet gecontroleerd wordt omdat je al vanuit binnen Schengen (Schiphol) vliegt.
Lijkt me veel teveel risico, met een vals paspoort juist naar Nederland waar een Italiaans en Oostenrijks paspoort toch echt wel grondig onderzocht worden en die "Balotelli" en "Jorg Haider" zitten dan lekker in een Schipholasielcel en niet op een zonnig terrasje in Duitsland of Denemarken...
The only limit is your own imagination
Ik ben niet gelovig aangelegd en maak daarin geen onderscheid tussen dominees, imams, scharenslieps, autohandelaren, politici en massamedia
Waarom er geen vliegtuig in het WTC vloog
Ik ben niet gelovig aangelegd en maak daarin geen onderscheid tussen dominees, imams, scharenslieps, autohandelaren, politici en massamedia
Waarom er geen vliegtuig in het WTC vloog
Q&A:
Nearly three days after it disappeared while en route from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing, mystery still shrouds the fate of Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 and the 239 people on board.
No debris from the Boeing 777-200ER has been recovered despite an international search involving the navies and air forces of several Asian nations as well as the United States.
Following are some questions surrounding the disappearance and the search, and answers by industry experts who spoke to AFP:
Q: Could the plane have disintegrated in mid-air?
The failure of the plane's pilots to send a distress signal has given rise to speculation there was a sudden catastrophe -- possibly caused by a mechanical failure or an explosion.
The lack of wreckage recovered so far also suggests a high-altitude disaster which spread debris across an area too wide to be easily detected.
"If it had been an impact at sea level of the whole craft, chances are more debris will be found immediately," said Chris de Lavigne, an expert on aerospace and defence issues at business consultancy Frost & Sullivan.
Sudden, accidental structural failures are considered extremely unlikely in today's passenger aircraft. This is especially so with the Boeing 777-200, which has one of the best safety records of any jet.
Authorities said the plane was at cruising altitude, 35,000 feet (11 kilometres) above sea level, when it last made contact.
"It's the safest point in the flight," de Lavigne said. "It's an extremely safe aircraft with very, very few incidents in its history. This is just overly puzzling."
Q. Have there been other plane mysteries like this?
Air France flight 447 crashed into the Atlantic Ocean in June 2009 while on a flight from Rio de Janeiro to Paris, killing 216 passengers and 12 crew. Debris was not found for days and it took years to locate the wreckage. Investigators eventually concluded that both technical and human error were to blame for the tragedy.
Adam Air flight 574 with 102 people on board disappeared from radar in January 2007, also at its cruise phase during a domestic flight in Indonesia. Debris was found nine days later after an extensive search and it took months to recover the plane's black box.
Indonesian authorities said the pilots lost control after becoming preoccupied with malfunctioning navigational equipment.
Q: What are the theories on what happened to MH370?
"One possibility is a mid-air explosion," said Gerry Soejatman, an Indonesia-based independent aviation analyst.
"The other is when there is a simple problem and then the crew tries to diagnose it, gets caught up in it and then they don't realise what's happening and the plane crashes. That's what happened with the Air France case. At the moment, until we find anything, it has to be one of these two scenarios."
De Lavigne said that at this stage, with so little information, all possibilities must be considered.
"It's either a serious mechanical failure or something a little bit more sinister," he said.
"It's pretty surprising that there was no SOS call from the plane and it just disappeared. It would lead to the conclusion that something fast and drastic happened."
Malaysian authorities have launched a terror investigation, but are refusing to rule anything out, including a possible hijacking.
Q: Why is it so hard to find evidence?
The region being searched, including the Gulf of Thailand and the South China Sea, are busy shipping lanes with large amounts of flotsam that will complicate the search for any wreckage.
"When they see something, it is not blatantly obvious that it is a wing or tail. They have to go and examine what it is, it takes time," Soejatman said.
Q: Why have authorities not picked up any signals?
Aircraft have an Emergency Locator Transmitter (ELT) which is designed mainly for when the plane crashes on land and pilots are still trying to control it. In the event of a major crash, it may not work.
"Basically what this beacon does is simply say 'I've been activated, find me!'" Soejatman said. "It is not fool-proof but it is the best thing that we have at the moment."
The plane also has a "black box" consisting of the cockpit voice recorder and the flight data recorder. If immersed in water they should activate a "pinger" that can draw investigators to the location. However, the sound cannot be heard over long distances.
"You need a ship equipped with a listening sonar to pick up the signal within the area," Soejatman said, cautioning however that the shallow waters of the MH370 search site could create interference.
The missing Boeing 777-200ER was also equipped with ACARS (Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System), a system which sends short messages to ground controllers -- either automatically or manually depending on the airline.
"If Malaysia Airlines does have these messages, that would be very useful" to determine events before it lost contact, Soejatman said.
Malaysia Airlines' chief executive Ahmad Jauhari Yahya told reporters at a press conference late Monday that the missing aircraft was equipped with ACARS, but did not provide any further details.
An airline representative later confirmed: "The aircraft has got the ACARS system which transmits automatically. There were no distress calls. No information was relayed."
Q: Is security at Kuala Lumpur International Airport questionable?
Revelations that at least two people aboard the plane were using stolen European passports have heightened fears about a security breach.
Rohan Gunaratna, a terrorism expert at Singapore's Nanyang Technological University, said the passport issue could indicate a "glaring flaw" in the airport's immigration clearance.
He noted that Interpol maintains a database of stolen passports that should have raised alarms at the immigration counter.
"There are two categories of people who use these (stolen passports) -- criminals and terrorists," he said.
Nearly three days after it disappeared while en route from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing, mystery still shrouds the fate of Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 and the 239 people on board.
No debris from the Boeing 777-200ER has been recovered despite an international search involving the navies and air forces of several Asian nations as well as the United States.
Following are some questions surrounding the disappearance and the search, and answers by industry experts who spoke to AFP:
Q: Could the plane have disintegrated in mid-air?
The failure of the plane's pilots to send a distress signal has given rise to speculation there was a sudden catastrophe -- possibly caused by a mechanical failure or an explosion.
The lack of wreckage recovered so far also suggests a high-altitude disaster which spread debris across an area too wide to be easily detected.
"If it had been an impact at sea level of the whole craft, chances are more debris will be found immediately," said Chris de Lavigne, an expert on aerospace and defence issues at business consultancy Frost & Sullivan.
Sudden, accidental structural failures are considered extremely unlikely in today's passenger aircraft. This is especially so with the Boeing 777-200, which has one of the best safety records of any jet.
Authorities said the plane was at cruising altitude, 35,000 feet (11 kilometres) above sea level, when it last made contact.
"It's the safest point in the flight," de Lavigne said. "It's an extremely safe aircraft with very, very few incidents in its history. This is just overly puzzling."
Q. Have there been other plane mysteries like this?
Air France flight 447 crashed into the Atlantic Ocean in June 2009 while on a flight from Rio de Janeiro to Paris, killing 216 passengers and 12 crew. Debris was not found for days and it took years to locate the wreckage. Investigators eventually concluded that both technical and human error were to blame for the tragedy.
Adam Air flight 574 with 102 people on board disappeared from radar in January 2007, also at its cruise phase during a domestic flight in Indonesia. Debris was found nine days later after an extensive search and it took months to recover the plane's black box.
Indonesian authorities said the pilots lost control after becoming preoccupied with malfunctioning navigational equipment.
Q: What are the theories on what happened to MH370?
"One possibility is a mid-air explosion," said Gerry Soejatman, an Indonesia-based independent aviation analyst.
"The other is when there is a simple problem and then the crew tries to diagnose it, gets caught up in it and then they don't realise what's happening and the plane crashes. That's what happened with the Air France case. At the moment, until we find anything, it has to be one of these two scenarios."
De Lavigne said that at this stage, with so little information, all possibilities must be considered.
"It's either a serious mechanical failure or something a little bit more sinister," he said.
"It's pretty surprising that there was no SOS call from the plane and it just disappeared. It would lead to the conclusion that something fast and drastic happened."
Malaysian authorities have launched a terror investigation, but are refusing to rule anything out, including a possible hijacking.
Q: Why is it so hard to find evidence?
The region being searched, including the Gulf of Thailand and the South China Sea, are busy shipping lanes with large amounts of flotsam that will complicate the search for any wreckage.
"When they see something, it is not blatantly obvious that it is a wing or tail. They have to go and examine what it is, it takes time," Soejatman said.
Q: Why have authorities not picked up any signals?
Aircraft have an Emergency Locator Transmitter (ELT) which is designed mainly for when the plane crashes on land and pilots are still trying to control it. In the event of a major crash, it may not work.
"Basically what this beacon does is simply say 'I've been activated, find me!'" Soejatman said. "It is not fool-proof but it is the best thing that we have at the moment."
The plane also has a "black box" consisting of the cockpit voice recorder and the flight data recorder. If immersed in water they should activate a "pinger" that can draw investigators to the location. However, the sound cannot be heard over long distances.
"You need a ship equipped with a listening sonar to pick up the signal within the area," Soejatman said, cautioning however that the shallow waters of the MH370 search site could create interference.
The missing Boeing 777-200ER was also equipped with ACARS (Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System), a system which sends short messages to ground controllers -- either automatically or manually depending on the airline.
"If Malaysia Airlines does have these messages, that would be very useful" to determine events before it lost contact, Soejatman said.
Malaysia Airlines' chief executive Ahmad Jauhari Yahya told reporters at a press conference late Monday that the missing aircraft was equipped with ACARS, but did not provide any further details.
An airline representative later confirmed: "The aircraft has got the ACARS system which transmits automatically. There were no distress calls. No information was relayed."
Q: Is security at Kuala Lumpur International Airport questionable?
Revelations that at least two people aboard the plane were using stolen European passports have heightened fears about a security breach.
Rohan Gunaratna, a terrorism expert at Singapore's Nanyang Technological University, said the passport issue could indicate a "glaring flaw" in the airport's immigration clearance.
He noted that Interpol maintains a database of stolen passports that should have raised alarms at the immigration counter.
"There are two categories of people who use these (stolen passports) -- criminals and terrorists," he said.
Haters everywhere but I don't really care.
Australie ofzo?quote:
Ik heb hier een enorm Lost gevoel over. De overlevenden zijn gewoon gestrand op een klein eiland.
Ja, en hoe doe je ervaring op in de regel denk je? Door er niet mee te vliegen?quote:
Copiloot had geen ervaring met dit toestel.
CNN) -- The first officer aboard Malaysia Airlines MH370 when it disappeared early Saturday from radar was transitioning to work on the Boeing 777-200.
Fariq Ab Hamid, a 27-year-old Malaysian, helped fly the plane from Hong Kong to Kuala Lumpur, where he landed it under the supervision of a senior pilot as well as a safety captain, according to CNN aviation correspondent Richard Quest, who was also in the cockpit.
The network was shooting video of the landing for use in a "CNN Business Traveler" program.
"It was interesting to watch the way he brought the aircraft in to land," Quest recalled about the February 19 landing, which the captain described as textbook-perfect.
Questions swirl after airliner vanishes
Are flight recorders 'antiquated?'
International crews search for plane
Hamid, who has 2,763 flying hours, joined Malaysia Airlines in 2007. He had been flying another jet and was transitioning to the Boeing 777-200 after having completed training in a flight simulator.
The airline's first officers are trained to the same standards as the captains, Quest said he was told by airline officials. "The captain was very much in control, but the first officer was flying the aircraft."
The missing plane was piloted by Capt. Zaharie Ahmad Shah, a 53-year-old Malaysian with 18,365 flying hours who joined the airline in 1981.
http://edition.cnn.com/20(...)lines-first-officer/
Het is...kiezen of delen, spelen winnen verliezen of vervelen en helemaal niets ondernemen
Wonderlijke conclusiezin die jij erboven plaatst.quote:
Copiloot had geen ervaring met dit toestel.
CNN) -- The first officer aboard Malaysia Airlines MH370 when it disappeared early Saturday from radar was transitioning to work on the Boeing 777-200.
Fariq Ab Hamid, a 27-year-old Malaysian, helped fly the plane from Hong Kong to Kuala Lumpur, where he landed it under the supervision of a senior pilot as well as a safety captain, according to CNN aviation correspondent Richard Quest, who was also in the cockpit.
The network was shooting video of the landing for use in a "CNN Business Traveler" program.
"It was interesting to watch the way he brought the aircraft in to land," Quest recalled about the February 19 landing, which the captain described as textbook-perfect.
Questions swirl after airliner vanishes
Are flight recorders 'antiquated?'
International crews search for plane
Hamid, who has 2,763 flying hours, joined Malaysia Airlines in 2007. He had been flying another jet and was transitioning to the Boeing 777-200 after having completed training in a flight simulator.
The airline's first officers are trained to the same standards as the captains, Quest said he was told by airline officials. "The captain was very much in control, but the first officer was flying the aircraft."
The missing plane was piloted by Capt. Zaharie Ahmad Shah, a 53-year-old Malaysian with 18,365 flying hours who joined the airline in 1981.
http://edition.cnn.com/20(...)lines-first-officer/
Hij vloog "text book example". Prima piloot dus.
The only limit is your own imagination
Ik ben niet gelovig aangelegd en maak daarin geen onderscheid tussen dominees, imams, scharenslieps, autohandelaren, politici en massamedia
Waarom er geen vliegtuig in het WTC vloog
Ik ben niet gelovig aangelegd en maak daarin geen onderscheid tussen dominees, imams, scharenslieps, autohandelaren, politici en massamedia
Waarom er geen vliegtuig in het WTC vloog
Eerst 50 jaar op de simulator en dan met pensioen.quote:
[..]
Ja, en hoe doe je ervaring op in de regel denk je? Door er niet mee te vliegen?
MENSEN!
Ik heb de OP even een beetje opgemaakt. Alle info staat redelijk logisch en in dezelfde opmaak. Alle nieuwsfeiten begin ik gewoon onder elkaar onderaan te plaatsen; constant verwerken wordt chaotisch. Dit heb ik ook bovenaan gezet. Dus voor de volgende TS (die hoef ik niet nog eens
) houd je hier aub aan!
Kijk er aub even door, en laat maar weten of er nog iets mist.
Ik heb de OP even een beetje opgemaakt. Alle info staat redelijk logisch en in dezelfde opmaak. Alle nieuwsfeiten begin ik gewoon onder elkaar onderaan te plaatsen; constant verwerken wordt chaotisch. Dit heb ik ook bovenaan gezet. Dus voor de volgende TS (die hoef ik niet nog eens
) houd je hier aub aan! Kijk er aub even door, en laat maar weten of er nog iets mist.
Even off-topic trouwens. Ik heb nog nooit Lost gekeken, maar wil dit al heel lang doen. Kan iemand mij zonder te spoilen dus even 2 dingen zeggen:
1) is de serie afgelopen of still running
2) heeft de serie een open einde, of is het (zoals Prison Break) echt klaar.
Ik wil niet online kijken, want dan spoil ik het eventueel voor mezelf.
1) is de serie afgelopen of still running
2) heeft de serie een open einde, of is het (zoals Prison Break) echt klaar.
Ik wil niet online kijken, want dan spoil ik het eventueel voor mezelf.
Ik denk dat ze toch in een of andere tijdsdimensie zijn gevlogen 
en dat ze dan in een parallel universum ergens zijn geland of ver ver in de toekomst in het jaar 3980 of zo 
en dat ze dan in een parallel universum ergens zijn geland of ver ver in de toekomst in het jaar 3980 of zo
"You can call me Susan if it makes you happy"
Afgelopen, echt einde wat door veel mensen verkeerd begrepen wordt.quote:Op maandag 10 maart 2014 19:56 schreef MrBanaan1 het volgende:
Even off-topic trouwens. Ik heb nog nooit Lost gekeken, maar wil dit al heel lang doen. Kan iemand mij zonder te spoilen dus even 2 dingen zeggen:
1) is de serie afgelopen of still running
2) heeft de serie een open einde, of is het (zoals Prison Break) echt klaar.
Ik wil niet online kijken, want dan spoil ik het eventueel voor mezelf.
Op dinsdag 1 november 2016 00:05 schreef JanCees het volgende:
De polls worden ook in 9 van de 10 gevallen gepeild met een meerderheid democraten. Soms zelf +10% _O-
De polls worden ook in 9 van de 10 gevallen gepeild met een meerderheid democraten. Soms zelf +10% _O-
Ik las een dagen geleden al dat de transmissies allemaal eenvoudig uit kunnen worden gezet dus de optie gewoon geland ergens in de jungle kan dus ook altijd nog.quote:
Op Vliegtuig stelen level 100.
Is al een paar jaar afgelopen, zijn 6 seizoenen in totaalquote:
Even off-topic trouwens. Ik heb nog nooit Lost gekeken, maar wil dit al heel lang doen. Kan iemand mij zonder te spoilen dus even 2 dingen zeggen:
1) is de serie afgelopen of still running
2) heeft de serie een open einde, of is het (zoals Prison Break) echt klaar.
Ik wil niet online kijken, want dan spoil ik het eventueel voor mezelf.
Geen open einde, maar wel beetje vaag
Afgelopen en zwaar crappy einde.quote:
Even off-topic trouwens. Ik heb nog nooit Lost gekeken, maar wil dit al heel lang doen. Kan iemand mij zonder te spoilen dus even 2 dingen zeggen:
1) is de serie afgelopen of still running
2) heeft de serie een open einde, of is het (zoals Prison Break) echt klaar.
Ik wil niet online kijken, want dan spoil ik het eventueel voor mezelf.
Haters everywhere but I don't really care.
