De Piratenpartij #2

quote:

De Piratenpartij is een themapartij. Wij komen op voor jouw belangen in de informatiesamenleving die nu door de politiek verwaarloosd worden. Bij ons weet je wat fundamenteel is: burgerrechten, privacy in het bijzonder, en de hervorming van auteursrecht en octrooirecht. Wat er ook gebeurt, wij houden daar strak aan vast.

Liquid Democracy (Dutch)

Piratenpartij campagnefilm 2012

quote:

Op zondag 2 september 2012 11:47 schreef trancethrust het volgende:
Laatste post vorige topic:

[..]

quote:

Viewing cable 09STOCKHOLM141, SPECIAL 301 FOR SWEDEN: POST RECOMMENDATION

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09STOCKHOLM141 2009-03-02 13:57 2011-08-30 01:44 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Stockholm
VZCZCXRO6778
OO RUEHAG RUEHAST RUEHDA RUEHDBU RUEHDF RUEHFL RUEHIK RUEHKW RUEHLA
RUEHLN RUEHLZ RUEHNP RUEHPOD RUEHROV RUEHSK RUEHSR RUEHVK RUEHYG
DE RUEHSM #0141/01 0611357
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 021357Z MAR 09
FM AMEMBASSY STOCKHOLM
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 4176
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 STOCKHOLM 000141

STATE FOR EEB/TPP/IPE:TIMOTHY R MCGOWAN

STATE PLEASE PASS TO USTR FOR JENNIFER CHOE GROVES

SENSITIVE

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KIPR ECON ETRD PGOV SW
SUBJECT: SPECIAL 301 FOR SWEDEN: POST RECOMMENDATION

REF: A) STATE 8410; B) 08 STATE 45106

¶1. (SBU) Summary. Embassy Stockholm recommends that Sweden
continues to be placed in the Special 301 Initiative, and not be on
the Watch List for 2009. We are aware of the differing
recommendations of the International Intellectual Property Alliance
(IIPA) and PhRMA. Post recommendation is based on:

-- The progress made by the Government of Sweden (GOS) in five out
of the six items identified in the Special 301 Initiative Action
plan we communicated to the GOS last year; and

-- The sensitive domestic politics that the GOS needs to manage in
order to step up internet piracy enforcement in Sweden. The GOS
struggles, with good intentions, against a very negative media
climate and against a vocal youth movement. For example, we want to
highlight the risk that negative media attention on the file sharing
issue gives the Pirate Party a boost in the EU Parliamentary
elections in June 2009.

¶2. (SBU) This cable reviews the progress Sweden has made on the
Special 301 Initiative Action plan which we presented to the GOS at
the conclusion of the Special 301 review 2008 (Ref B). Post
continues to engage very constructively with the GOS, and has good
access and a good working relationship with key senior and working
level GOS officials. The actions taken since last year's review
strengthen the legislative framework and provide better enforcement
tools for combating piracy. The Pirate Bay trial is currently being
heard in the district court in Stockholm. The last day of the trial
is March 4, and the verdict can be expected on or about March 25.

¶3. (SBU) Embassy Stockholm believes it would be counter-productive
to watch list Sweden at this point. Likely negative political and
media reaction to a watch listing must be taken into account. The
Justice Ministry, with primary responsibility for this issue, is
fully on board and well aware of what is at stake. It is currently
battling with the Ministry of Enterprise, Energy, and Communication
about the next appropriate steps to curb internet piracy. Now that
the Enforcement Directive implementation will finally enter into
force on April 1, and there will soon be a first District court
decision in the Pirate Bay case -- the Justice Ministry will turn
its attention to other key issues, primarily the ISP liability issue
and extra resources to investigative capabilities. The GOS (led by
the Justice Ministry) has to conduct a delicate balancing act,
advancing this issue shortly before Sweden assumes the Presidency of
the EU, in the early days of the Obama administration, and in the
budding election campaign for the EU Parliamentary elections.

End summary.

Background
----------

¶4. (U) The International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA) has,
in its yearly Special 301 submission to USTR, identified widespread
internet piracy and difficulties in achieving effective enforcement
against criminal copyright infringement as problems in Sweden, and
has requested that Sweden be placed on the Special 301 Watch List
for 2009. Sweden was not placed on the Watch list in 2008, despite
industry's demands, but was rather placed in the relatively recent,
middle step, named Special 301 Initiative. As part of the
Initiative, post conveyed a Special 301 Action plan to the GOS,
covering six items where the USG hoped to see progress during 2008.

Review of progress on action plan
---------------------------------

¶5. (U) The Special 301 Initiative Action plan 2008 contained
recommendations in six specific areas. The GOS has acted, in
various degrees, in five of those areas. A review of progress in
the six areas follows in paras 6-11:

¶6. (SBU) Industry consultations/ISP liability: The GOS held a
series of industry consultations in the summer/fall of 2008, with
the explicit aim to discuss a voluntary industry agreement involving
ISPs and right-holders organizations. Industry contacts reported
that the ISP's were not willing (they claim they are not able) to
take on any action on a voluntary basis. The first round of
consultations was concluded without results during the fall of 2008.
The Justice Ministry is currently working internally in the GOS to
get acceptance for a second round with a clear incentive for
progress, i.e. threatening with legislation in the absence of a
voluntary agreement. There is some resistance in the Center party
led Ministry of Enterprise, Energy, and Communications, and
negotiations are on-going at senior GOS-levels.

¶7. (U) Injunctive relief: The one item without any progress is

STOCKHOLM 00000141 002 OF 003


Action plan item 2, Injunctive relief. The GOS maintains that there
are adequate provisions currently on the books in Sweden, and does
not intend to introduce new legislation. (Note that industry claims
to the contrary were supported by the recommendations of the Renfors
Commission, a government study commissioned to look into the file
sharing issue. The GOS has declared that it will not further
implement Renfors' recommendations. End note.)

¶8. (U) Implementation of the Enforcement Directive: The bill was
approved by Parliament on February 25, and the new provisions will
enter into force on April 1, 2009. The political sensitivities made
the final handling of the Bill very delicate for the Alliance
government. Much of the debate and negotiations have been done in
public, and there has been tremendous pressure put on individual
MPs. The passage of the implementing legislation is therefore a
much greater victory for the GOS than it might appear. Major
changes, compared to the original proposal, are:

-- the law will not be retroactive, i.e. only for copyright
infringements committed after the law has entered into force can a
court order that the identity behind an IP-number be handed out.

-- The court will make a proportionality assessment, i. e. weigh the
need of the rights-holder to get access to the personal identity
against integrity aspects of the person behind the IP number. The
law now stipulates that a certain scale of infringement will be
needed for the court to decide that the information should be handed
out. Normally, that would be the case when the infringement
consists of up-loading a single film or musical piece -- since that
typically incurs significant damage to the rights-holder. The same
judgment will be made for a significant scale of down-loading
copyright protected material. The law establishes that if the
infringement is the down-loading of only a "few pieces", then
normally the court's assessment should be that the integrity
interest must take precedence and the information must not be handed
out.

-- The law includes provisions that the GOS intends to observe and
assess how the law is used, to ensure that the law is indeed used to
go after significant cases of copyright infringements. This
monitoring will commence immediately once the law has entered into
force.

¶9. (U) Granting police and prosecutors the right to identities
behind IP numbers of individuals potentially implicated in copyright
crimes of lower dignity, i.e. fines rather than prison sentences:
The Justice Ministry has also worked towards the goal of changing
legislation so that police and prosecutors can get access to
information about identities behind IP numbers in cases where the
crime could lead to a fine (rather than a prison sentence). The
usual Swedish term for this type of crime (punishable by fine, not
prison) is "crime of lower dignity." At present, law enforcement
officials are only allowed to get such information if the
infringement could lead to a prison sentence. The GOS has agreed to
change the legislation, and it was made part of a study commissioned
to propose the steps needed to implement such a change. The
proposed changes were recently separated out from the rest of the
study, and were reported in advance to Justice Minister Ask late
January 2009. Although the slow legislative process is
disappointing, the GOS has already agreed on the necessary changes
that will strengthen the investigative tools of enforcement
officials.

¶10. (SBU) Police and prosecutors: There are now two full-time
prosecutors dedicated to IPR/copyright issues. Police officers
have been trained, but we understand that they are not allowed to
devote attention to IPR/copyright issues. They are back in their
regular line of duty in their districts, where there are conflicting
priorities. We have understood that the prosecutors have alerted
that this is a problem for their work - they are "stuck" with a
backlog of old errands and without the support of investigative
officers. The prosecutors ask for investigative officers that are
exclusively devoted to IPR issues, today there are no such
investigative capacities. The Justice Ministry has repeatedly asked
the Head of the Swedish Police for information about how he plans to
come to terms with the investigation deficiencies. Although the GOS
recognizes the needs, the budget bill for next year will likely not
contain significant increases for law enforcement, given the harsh
economic conditions. This is an area where post can work with the
GOS and industry to highlight the significant impact additional
resources in this area might have.

¶11. (SBU) Public education: In the fall of 2008, the GOS released a
new information material, primarily aimed for youth, which will be
broadly distributed in Swedish schools. Justice Minister Ask's
staffers are currently considering the pros and cons of engaging
Cabinet members in the public debate. Given all the negative

STOCKHOLM 00000141 003 OF 003


attention around the Enforcement directive and the Pirate Bay trial,
the determination thus far has been to keep a low profile. The GOS
recognizes that there is a real risk that the window of opportunity
was lost already several years ago -- when leadingQticians
didn't take the debate. How to engage at this point is a delicate
matter.

Pirate Bay
----------

¶12. (U) After the raid on Pirate Bay on May 31, 2006, the issue of
internet piracy was fiercely debated in Sweden. Press coverage was
largely, and still is, unfavorable to the positions taken by
rights-holders and the USG. The Pirate Bay raid was portrayed as
the GOS caving to USG pressure. The delicate situation made it
difficult, if not counter-productive, for the Embassy to play a
public role on IPR issues. Behind the scenes, the Embassy has
worked well with all stakeholders. After 18 months of
investigation, the prosecutor filed indictments against four
individuals for contribution to copyright infringement because of
their activities administrating the Pirate Bay bit torrent webpage.
The case is currently being heard in the district court in
Stockholm, and the trial is scheduled to be completed on March 4.
The sentence is expected on or about March 25, i.e. before the
conclusion of the Special 301 review process. However, we fully
expect that any outcome will be appealed to a higher court, which
means that the final verdict will not be known for several years.

PhRMA's drug pricing issue
--------------------------

¶13. (U) PhRMA has also requested that Sweden be put on thQ
Special 301 Watch List. The request is based on the GOS decision to
de-regulate the pharmacy market in Sweden and the alleged plans to
reduce prices of patented pharmaceuticals on the Swedish market with
the aim to finance the redesign. The price cut is believed to be as
high as 10 percent.

¶14. (U) According to the Swedish Ministry of Health and Social
Affairs, the GOS does not plan to impose a general price cut on
patented pharmaceuticals, but rather has the intention of
maintaining a model for a value based pricing system. TLV, the
Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits Agency, a central government
agency, has been assigned to suggest principles for pharmacy mark-up
and to suggest how the profitability in the pharmacy market will be
assessed and followed up. TLV will present its proposals to the GOS
on April 1 this year.

¶15. (U) As of March 2 there is no decision, nor anything in
writing, that confirms that the GOS is actually proposing a 10
percent general price cut on patented pharmaceuticals. Therefore
the Embassy does not recommend that Sweden be put on the 2009
Special 301 Watch List as concerns the de-regulation of the Swedish
pharmacies. However, should the GOS as a result of the April 1 TLV
report reach a decision to impose a general 10 percent price cut on
patented pharmaceuticals, the Embassy will engage in high-level
advocacy with the GOS on the issue again.

SILVERMAN

Bron: Wikileaks

quote:

Piratenboot zet koers richting Tweede Kamer

Nautische termen en een naam als Piratenpartij zijn leuk, maar de Piratenpartij is deze week ook echt met een boot op campagne en doet daarbij verschillende Nederlandse havens aan. Deze boot is voor dit doel door een sponsor ter beschikking gesteld.

De boot wordt bemand door Piraten en ook zullen kandidaten en vertegenwoordigers van de partij aanwezig zijn bij het aanmeren. In de aanlegplaatsen zal een kleine markt rondom het schip aanwezig zijn om landrotten te informeren over de partij en haar visie. Leden en belangstellenden zijn van harte welkom.

De Piratenboot is te herkennen aan een groot model van de vlag van de Piratenpartij.

Benieuwd of en wanneer de Piraten jouw stad enteren voordat zij koers zetten naar Den Haag? Hieronder de richttijden en havens. Volg ons op Twitter en/of check de website voor actuele updates, ook over het programma. Contact: mail naar boot@piratenpartij.nl

Rotterdam Veerhaven (Veerkade 15) : Aankomst: maandagavond 19.00 - 19.15 uur tot dinsdag 12:00
Delft Passantenhaven: dinsdag 17:00 tot woensdag 12:00
Den-Haag Binkhorst-Laakhaven: woensdag 17:00 tot donderdag 12:00
Leiden haven: donderdag 17:00 tot vrijdag 12:00
Amsterdam Nieuwe Meer: vrijdag 17:00 tot zaterdag 12:00
Amsterdam Kattenburg: zaterdag 17:00 tot maandag 12:00
Nieuwegein Passantenhaven: maandag 17:00 tot dinsdag 12:00

quote:

Op woensdag 5 september 2012 00:02 schreef AnimeFan het volgende:
Tot 01:00 nog Dirk Poot op radio 6.
http://radioplayer.omroep.nl/radio6/

Voor wie nog wakker is. Ik zal morgen de podcast uppen

quote:

Op woensdag 5 september 2012 11:19 schreef trancethrust het volgende:

[..]

Zie boven

quote:

Op woensdag 5 september 2012 00:02 schreef AnimeFan het volgende:
Tot 01:00 nog Dirk Poot op radio 6.
http://radioplayer.omroep.nl/radio6/

Voor wie nog wakker is. Ik zal morgen de podcast uppen