[Noorwegen] Bomaanslag en schietpartij Oslo #28:

quote:

Op zondag 24 juli 2011 00:40 schreef Merkie het volgende:

[..]

Ik heb het over bepaalde aspecten van de islamitische cultuur, niet de islam opzich. Ik vind het irritant dat ik als enige zorgvuldig ben in mijn woordkeus en jullie allerlei termen maar door elkaar heen gooien en de term die jullie het beste uitkomt gebruiken.

quote:

Op zondag 24 juli 2011 00:38 schreef Merkie het volgende:

[..]

De cultuur van het doodmaken van ongelovigen, 8-jarigen ophangen en minderwaardig behandelen van vrouwen komt (bijna) uitsluitend voor bij moslims. Dat wil niet zeggen dat alle moslims deze cultuur hebben. Een koe is een dier, een dier is geen koe, etc.

quote:

Op zondag 24 juli 2011 00:40 schreef Mutant01 het volgende:

[..]

Dergelijke incidenten kan je prima extrapoleren naar de specifieke culturen zelf, zonder daarbij te generaliseren. Denk daarbij aan "de Iraanse cultuur", of "de Saoedische cultuur". Aangezien je kennelijk al op de hoogte bent van de culturele verschillen onderling. Is makkelijker toch?

quote:

Op zondag 24 juli 2011 00:40 schreef Mutant01 het volgende:

[..]

Dergelijke incidenten kan je prima extrapoleren naar de specifieke culturen zelf, zonder daarbij te generaliseren. Denk daarbij aan "de Iraanse cultuur", of "de Saoedische cultuur". Aangezien je kennelijk al op de hoogte bent van de culturele verschillen onderling. Is makkelijker toch?

quote:

Op zondag 24 juli 2011 00:40 schreef Specularium het volgende:

[..]

Die Ludolfs.

quote:

Op zondag 24 juli 2011 00:42 schreef Doler12 het volgende:

[..]

Boze AryaMehr reactie in 3 2 1

quote:

Op zondag 24 juli 2011 00:25 schreef SuperHarregarre het volgende:

[..]

Ik heb zelf geen PVV gestemd maar ik kan niet ontkennen dat ik niet echt een positief en warm gevoel krijg bij de islam.

quote:

Op zondag 24 juli 2011 00:41 schreef MarokkaanseKip het volgende:

[..]

Dan zijn dat idd niet zo'n goeie moslims en meer cultuur-verbonden. Ken jij zulke mensen persoonlijk? Dacht het niet. Dus waar ben je nu 'bang' voor?

quote:

Op zondag 24 juli 2011 00:39 schreef AryaMehr het volgende:

[..]


Maar goed, andere discussie.

quote:

Op zaterdag 23 juli 2011 23:50 schreef Jor_Dii het volgende:
Het genoemde liedje (dat hij misschien dus heeft gedraaid op zijn iPod gedurende het schieten):

Lux Aeterna By Clint Mansell

quote:

Op zondag 24 juli 2011 00:41 schreef Xessive het volgende:

[..]

Hier nog een.

Maar ik vraag me sowieso al tijden af waar al die moslims zitten die Nederland en de rest van Europa willen overnemen. Volgens mij heeft iedereen het al druk genoeg met zijn dagelijkse bezigheden.

quote:

Op zondag 24 juli 2011 00:43 schreef yvonne het volgende:

[..]

Hoe weet je dat

quote:

Op zondag 24 juli 2011 00:43 schreef yvonne het volgende:

[..]

Hoe weet je dat

quote:

Op zondag 24 juli 2011 00:43 schreef capricia het volgende:

[..]

Ik krijg bij geen enkele godsdienst een warm gevoel.
Maar ik vind wel dat mensen rechten hebben. En een van die rechten is vrijheid van godsdienst.

quote:

Op zondag 24 juli 2011 00:42 schreef Merkie het volgende:

[..]

Vind ik niet makkelijker, er worden veel gruweldaden gepleegd uit naam van de islam. Het maakt mij persoonlijk weinig uit of dat in Saoedie-Arabië of Iran gebeurt. Het zijn extremistische culturele aspecten van islamitische landen die ik verafschuw.

quote:

Op zondag 24 juli 2011 00:44 schreef Madame_Paon het volgende:

[..]

Staat in het 1500 pagina's tellende manifest.

quote:

Op zondag 24 juli 2011 00:42 schreef Doler12 het volgende:
Boze AryaMehr reactie in 3 2 1

quote:

Op zondag 24 juli 2011 00:44 schreef Mutant01 het volgende:

[..]

Mij wel. Daarnaast is het beledigend, aangezien ik niet wil dat mijn identiteit geassocieerd wordt met dergelijke nutcakes. Net als dat jij niet geassocieerd wilt worden met deze gek, lijkt me. Catch my drift?

quote:

Op zondag 24 juli 2011 00:43 schreef capricia het volgende:

[..]

Ik krijg bij geen enkele godsdienst een warm gevoel.
Maar ik vind wel dat mensen rechten hebben. En een van die rechten is vrijheid van godsdienst.

quote:

Op zondag 24 juli 2011 00:43 schreef Merkie het volgende:

[..]

Ik ben helemaal nergens bang voor omdat ik inderdaad zulke mensen niet ken. Daarom snap ik niet dat mensen (zoals jij) die zich niet inlaten met deze gebruiken (neem ik aan) desondanks toch mijn persoontje afkeuren. Dat is nou precies wat ik probeer te zeggen.

quote:

The Netherlands, which for centuries was a haven for those seeking more freedom of thought, is becoming an increasingly totalitarian society as a direct result of mass immigration in general and Muslim immigration in particular. This is the reason why the insightful Hans Janssen, Professor of Modern Islamic Ideology at Utrecht University, stated that a peaceful society that wishes to remain existent “will have to find a way to defend itself through non-peaceful means from people who are not peaceful.” According to Jansen, Muslim fundamentalists frequently make threats, but Dutch media remain silent[3] about them.

Public broadcaster NPS[4] is producing a television programme with the objective of giving the Dutch population a positive view of Muslims and other immigrant groups. Meanwhile, in 2008 it was revealed that a policeman of Moroccan origins in the Rotterdam police corps has been unmasked as a spy for the Moroccan intelligence service. He led a project that trained 57 Moroccan problem youngsters as ground personnel for Rotterdam Airport. The Public Prosecutor’s Office (OM) decided not to prosecute him, allegedly because this could potentially generate negative publicity about the “Multicultural” society. Even after this was revealed, the policeman unmasked as a spy for a foreign country continued[5] working at Rotterdam Airport. The airport management saw no reason to refuse him a job.

In contrast, the Dutch Labour Party (PvdA) tried to muzzle[6] a (then) member who was fighting for the rights of Muslim apostates because they feared he would cause the party electoral damage. As most other left-wing parties in the Western world, they get a disproportionate number of immigrant votes. The man in question, the brave ex-Muslim Ehsan Jami[7], in the spring of 2008 decided to close down his organisation of former Muslims who defy the traditional death penalty for leaving Islam. He claims people are scared to join the organisation because of threats from Muslims.

Slotervaart[8], a Moroccan neighbourhood in Amsterdam, has been plagued by riots and arson. Just as in similar areas in Sweden, France, England and elsewhere, emergency personnel from the fire brigade and ambulance services are at risk of physical attacks when they enter. Western Europe’s major cities have become notorious for their rapidly expanding “no-go” zones, from Birmingham, London and Bradford via Marseilles, Paris, Antwerp and Brussels to Copenhagen, Berlin and Hamburg. There are now many areas into which even the police dare not venture without substantial backup. In certain urban areas the fire brigade and ambulance services are reluctant to answer calls in Muslim neighbourhoods, where “youths” set fire to public buildings, and then lay an ambush for the fire brigade when it arrives.

In mid-September 2008, the bus service in the Dutch town of Gouda announced it would not drive though the Oosterwei[9] neighbourhood. The decision came following complaints from bus drivers who report that on their route through the neighbourhood they are being spit on, threatened and robbed by Moroccan youth, who systematically kick against the buses as well.

It has earlier been revealed that Moroccans, Turks and other Muslims in the Netherlands receive direction from their home countries. Ethnic Turks have received instructions from Turkey on how to vote in Dutch elections.

Also in mid-September 2008, politician Geert Wilders[10] said during a speech in Parliament that Moroccans are colonising the Netherlands. According to Wilders, Moroccans didn’t come there to integrate, but “to subjugate the Dutch” and rule over them. “We lose our nation to Moroccan scum who go through life while abusing, spitting and molesting innocent people,” Wilders stated. “They happily accept our dole, houses and doctors, but not our rules and values”, he said. According to him there are “two nations.” The cabinet’s nation is that of “climate hysterics and uncontrollable Islamisation.” The other nation, “my nation,” Geert Wilders said, “is that of the people who have to foot the bill and are being robbed and threatened by Islamic street terrorists.”

Seven minutes after the speech began, “a technical error” occurred in the television broadcast which was mysteriously solved the very second Wilders finished his speech. The state TV is notoriously biased in their pro-Multicultural opinions and belief that Wilders is evil.

As I wrote in my online essay “Democracy and the Media Bias[11]”, in democratic societies the press, the Fourth Estate, should supposedly make sure that the government does its job properly as well as raise issues of public interest. In practice, we now seem to have a situation where the political elites cooperate with the media on making sure that some topics receive insufficient or unbalanced attention while others are simply kept off the agenda altogether. Together they form a new political class.

Before the rise of maverick politician Pim Fortuyn[12], the Dutch political scene had to a great extent been a closed club whose members, regardless of party affiliation, shared similar views in the widest possible sense. Most of the journalists belonged to the same club. If the majority of the populace didn’t quite agree with this elite on sensitive issues — and the most sensitive of them all was Muslim immigration — this hardly mattered much. Since all those who were in positions of power were in basic agreement, the will of the people could safely be ignored. Journalists and rival politicians — notice how they worked in lockstep — smeared Fortuyn as a dangerous “right-wing extremist.” Indirectly, this led to his murder by a left-wing activist who stated that he killed him on behalf of Muslims because he was “dangerous” to minorities.

Pim Fortuyn was indirectly murdered by the political, cultural and media elites whereas filmmaker Theo van Gogh was murdered by Muslims. MP Ayaan Hirsi Ali has been driven from the country. The Islam-critical MP Geert Wilders is still there, but he is subject to similar smears as Fortuyn was about being a racist, receives daily threats from Muslims and not-so-subtle hints from the establishment that he should tone down his criticism of Muslim immigration. The Dutch spirit between 2001 and 2008 appears to have been broken, as things are slowly returning to normal. The extended political elites are once again firmly in control of public debate, and the embarrassing peasant rebellion has been successfully struck down.

Perhaps Holland’s chance of saving itself died with Fortuyn. I hope not. I have always loved the Netherlands, and it would be extremely sad if a once-great nation that has spent so much time and energy on keeping the sea out will be destroyed by a tidal wave of sharia barbarism.

In May 2008 the cartoonist writing under the pseudonym Gregorius Nekschot[13] became the first-ever cartoonist to be arrested in the modern Western world. He was arrested at his home in Amsterdam and taken into custody for interrogation, suspected of “publishing cartoons which are discriminating for Muslims and people with dark skin.” At the same time, the city of Amsterdam developed teaching material[14] warning children against the politics of the Islam-critical politician Geert Wilders. MP Wilders called the campaign “sickening.”

Wilders’ movie Fitna from March 2008 produced strong reactions from Muslims on a global basis and condemnations from dhimmi appeasers in the Western world. Although the short film didn’t do anything other than quote the Koran and statements by Muslim leaders, the United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon[15] condemned it as offensively anti-Islamic. “There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.” The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Louise Arbour[16] joined in on condemning the tone and content of Fitna and noted that the Dutch and others should prohibit any advocacy of racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination or hostility. In plain words, they should ban criticism of Islam.

There are already examples where small Dutch websites[17] have been prosecuted for carrying readers’ comments critical of Islam and Muslims, thus setting a legal precedent for the suppression of free speech on the Internet[18]. This despite the fact that far more offensive material is routinely posted on Islamic online forums and is never subjected to any punishment. Similar developments are taking place in other European countries. This is encouraged not only by national authorities but by EU officials, who have expressed their desire to “regulate” blogs and similar websites more because they are often more critical of multiculturalism, mass immigration and general EU policies than are the mainstream media.

What this means is that Dutch authorities are giving in to demands from Islamic countries and kneel at the feet of their new Muslim masters. There can be no doubt that there is considerable political pressure on the police and others to enforce Multicultural speech codes and silence dissenters among the natives. Since we see clearly that Muslims can post negative remarks about the natives, but the natives are not allowed to post negative remarks about Islamic culture, this means that the natives are de facto second-rate citizens in their own country. This is coincidentally the status that they are supposed to have according to sharia, which means that the authorities are now enforcers of Islamic law.

Some observers say that the political elites in Western Europe are “powerless” to stop street violence. But they are aggressive in suppressing criticism of continued mass immigration, which indicates that they are not so much powerless as actively hostile to the natives.

In Brussels, Belgium, gangs of Muslim immigrants harass the natives on a daily basis. We have had several recent cases where native girls have been gang raped by immigrants in the heart of the EU capital, yet when the natives wanted to protest against the Islamisation of their continent on September 11th 2007, the demonstration was banned by the Socialist mayor of Brussels, whose ruling party is heavily infiltrated by Muslims. Those who attempted to carry on with a peaceful protest were arrested by the police.

Dozens[19] of boys and girls have been systematically abused, intimidated and molested by a group of older boys in the Utrecht neighbourhood of Overvecht. Children aged 8, 9 and 10 have been dragged into bushes and coerced into performing sexual acts on boys a few years older. Most of the children involved are of Moroccan background. A municipal council member said that the problems are not being addressed. “This has been going on for almost a year. People just talk and talk and talk. And nothing is done,” she said.

In March 2007, native Dutch residents of the city of Utrecht rioted to protest against harassment by Muslim youths and government inaction to stop this. The authorities immediately suppressed the riots by sealing off the area and installing surveillance cameras to control Dutch non-Muslims, but they have done virtually nothing to address the underlying problem of violence from immigrant gangs. The case is far from unique.

Such incidents demonstrate that the authorities throughout Western Europe are now dedicated to implementing continued mass immigration and multiculturalism no matter what the natives think. If they object, they will be silenced. The Dutch voted “no” by a very large margin to the proposed EU Constitution that will formally dismantle their country, as did Irish and French voters, but they are simply ignored. At the same time, the EU elites obediently respond to calls from Islamic countries to ban “stereotypes and prejudice” targeting Islam. European political elites implement the agendas of our enemies and ignore the interests of their own people. They are thus collaborators and traitors and should be treated accordingly.