9/11 #48: We zijn bijna deeltje 50 aan het naderen...

En we gaan verder. Want het laatste woord is er nog niet uit

Vorige deel: 9/11 #47: Waar tijd nodig is om een overtuigende Bin Laden te soepen

+ vraag aan Hoppahoppa:

quote:

Op zaterdag 7 mei 2011 17:28 schreef Hoppahoppa het volgende:

Ik kan mijn theorie keurig onderbouwen. Er zijn genoeg filmpjes waarop perfect te zien is dat er twee vliegtuigen bij de aanslag zijn gebruikt. Zoals al eerder aangegeven is er nog niet één filmpje getoond waarop te zien is dat de vliegtuigen fake zijn. In dat opzicht hoef ik ook niets te bewijzen. Ik trek veel in twijfel rondom 9/11, maar niet het gebruik van vliegtuigen.

Hier wil ik nog wel ff op reageren. Er zijn genoeg filmpjes waarop vliegtuigen te zien zijn. Hiermee impliceer jij dus dat je gelooft wat je op TV ziet. In Independence day hing er een gigantisch buitenaards moederschip boven een stad in de V.S.

Stel dat ze dergelijke beelden nu in het nieuws over de gehele wereld zouden laten zien... zou je het dan blindelings geloven?

quote:

Op zaterdag 7 mei 2011 21:29 schreef THEFXR het volgende:
het is toch algemeen bekend dat de towers een 707 konden weerstaan!

Al zou het technisch gezien mogelijk zijn geweest dat er vliegtuigen in zijn gevlogen en de torens zijn ingestort, dan nog is het niet gebeurd.

De televisie is hier het wapen en niet de vliegtuigen.

quote:

Op zaterdag 7 mei 2011 21:29 schreef THEFXR het volgende:
het is toch algemeen bekend dat de towers een 707 konden weerstaan!

Blijkbaar niet hè.. Fukushima kon ook een tsunami weerstaan trouwens. Of, nee, toch niet.

quote:

Op zaterdag 7 mei 2011 21:39 schreef J0kkebr0k het volgende:

[..]

De televisie is hier het wapen en niet de vliegtuigen.

Jij hebt je tv de deur uit gedaan mag ik aannemen?

quote:

Op zaterdag 7 mei 2011 21:40 schreef Scrummie het volgende:

[..]

Jij hebt je tv de deur uit gedaan mag ik aannemen?

Natuurlijk niet, maar ik kijk wel met argusogen naar de gebeurtenissen in de wereld die via het nieuws de huiskamer in worden gestuurd.

quote:

Op zaterdag 7 mei 2011 21:49 schreef THEFXR het volgende:

[..]

dit toch wel de beste vergelijking die ik ooit gelezen hebt,van een feyenoord hooligan

Ik ben ook een Feyenoord supporter... ben ik nu ook een hooligan?

Hier trouwens een leuk Bin Laden filmpje...

Moet ze nageven... ze hebben humor:



[ Bericht 35% gewijzigd door #ANONIEM op 07-05-2011 21:52:05 ]

quote:

Op zaterdag 7 mei 2011 21:58 schreef THEFXR het volgende:

[..]

ja

Moet je voor mijn smoel zeggen... dan krijg je er een paar. Neus!

quote:

Op zaterdag 7 mei 2011 22:00 schreef Cyclonis het volgende:

[..]

Eigenlijk komt het er op neer dat om jouw theorie te accepteren, ik me eerst in een soort Matrix-achtige wereld moet wanen, waarin alles wat ik om me heen zie niet echt bestaat.

Nou nee hoor. Dat valt best mee. Ik ben aardig down to earth, om het maar zo te zeggen. Voor Matrix achtige werelden, raad ik je aan om met Bankfurt te babbelen.

quote:

Op zaterdag 7 mei 2011 22:03 schreef THEFXR het volgende:

[..]

zie je wel

Wie hebben in de V.S. de media in handen:


2009 revenues: $157 billion
General Electric media-related holdings include television networks NBC and Telemundo, Universal Pictures, Focus Features, 26 television stations in the United States and cable networks MSNBC, Bravo and the Sci Fi Channel. GE also owns 80 percent of NBC Universal.


2009 revenues: $36.1 billion
The Walt Disney Company owns the ABC Television Network, cable networks including ESPN, the Disney Channel, SOAPnet, A&E and Lifetime, 277 radio stations, music and book publishing companies, production companies Touchstone, Miramax and Walt Disney Pictures, Pixar Animation Studios, the cellular service Disney Mobile, and theme parks around the world.


2009 revenues: $30.4 billion
News Corporation’s media holdings include: the Fox Broadcasting Company; television and cable networks such as Fox, Fox Business Channel, National Geographic and FX; print publications including the Wall Street Journal, the New York Post and TVGuide; the magazines Barron’s and SmartMoney; book publisher HarperCollins; film production companies 20th Century Fox, Fox Searchlight Pictures and Blue Sky Studios; numerous websites including MarketWatch.com; and non-media holdings including the National Rugby League.


2009 revenues: $25.8 billion
Time Warner is the largest media conglomerate in the world, with holdings including: CNN, the CW (a joint venture with CBS), HBO, Cinemax, Cartoon Network, TBS, TNT, America Online, MapQuest, Moviefone, Warner Bros. Pictures, Castle Rock and New Line Cinema, and more than 150 magazines including Time, Sports Illustrated, Fortune, Marie Claire and People.


2009 revenues: $13.6 billion
Viacom holdings include: MTV, Nickelodeon/Nick-at-Nite, VH1, BET, Comedy Central, Paramount Pictures, Paramount Home Entertainment, Atom Entertainment, and music game developer Harmonix. Viacom 18 is a joint venture with the Indian media company Global Broadcast news.


2009 revenues: $13 billion
CBS Corporation owns the CBS Television Network, CBS Television Distribution Group, the CW (a joint venture with Time Warner), Showtime, book publisher Simon & Schuster, 30 television stations, and CBS Radio, Inc, which has 130 stations. CBS is now the leading supplier of video to Google’s new Video Marketplace.

Bron: http://www.freepress.net/ownership/chart/main

Stel nu hé.... stel....

Dat deze machtige organisaties, waarvan duidelijk is dat ze een enorme vinger in de pap hebben binnen de (Amerikaanse) media, in het complot betrokken zijn. Zou het dan zo zijn dat overige media klakkeloos het nieuws overnemen wat zij berichten?

Zou het zo kunnen zijn dat er ook door deze media... ontzettend veel geld verdiend zou kunnen zijn door deel te nemen aan de 9/11 terrorsimulatie?

quote:

Op zaterdag 7 mei 2011 22:06 schreef Loppe het volgende:

[..]

Osama uit http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/05/07/pakistan.bin.laden.intelligence/index.html?hpt=T1&iref=BN1

Je kan gelijk hebben JB. Hoelang kun je wachten op originele filmpjes die geen vliegtuigen vertonen?

Ik snap niet wat je bedoelt Loppe? Die filmpjes komen er niet. Tenminste... ik verwacht van niet. Tenzij er een mannetje gaat lekken. Of heb ik je verkeerd begrepen?

[ Bericht 1% gewijzigd door #ANONIEM op 07-05-2011 22:09:56 ]

quote:

Op zaterdag 7 mei 2011 22:11 schreef Loppe het volgende:

[..]

Ik dacht aan amateuropnames.

Ah.. ik snap hem, denk ik.... hoewel iets meer tekst je niet zou misstaan...

Maar goed.. ik denk dat ik weet waar je op doelt. Je wilt zeggen... stel dat er geen vliegtuigen in de torens gevlogen zijn, dan moet er toch vroeg of laat een legitiem amateurfilmpje opduiken waarop alleen een explosie te zien is en geen vliegtuig.

Bedoel je dit?

[ Bericht 0% gewijzigd door #ANONIEM op 07-05-2011 22:22:02 ]

quote:

Op zaterdag 7 mei 2011 22:45 schreef Loppe het volgende:

[..]

Hoe minder ik zeg, hoe meer jij moet denken. Maar ja, dat bedoel ik.

Ik vind het een prima vraag. Ik kan er alleen maar over zeggen dat ik ook niet weet waarom dat niet is gebeurd. Aan de andere kant: Van de eerste impact zijn alleen beelden die "toevallig" zijn geschoten door de Naudet filmcrew. Van de 2de impact zijn vrij veel beelden:


Aan de andere kant... wie heeft er rond kwart voor 9 op een dinsdag ochtend allemaal een camera op zak? Mobieltjes waren toen nog niet uitgerust met een (fatsoenlijke) camera.

[ Bericht 1% gewijzigd door #ANONIEM op 07-05-2011 22:56:45 ]

quote:

Op zaterdag 7 mei 2011 23:00 schreef Loppe het volgende:
aan de andere kant: NY is een miljoenenstad

Klopt... maar het zicht wordt ook vaak belemmerd door de hoge gebouwen. Vooral als je op de grond staat.

[ Bericht 3% gewijzigd door #ANONIEM op 07-05-2011 23:04:06 ]

Foto's van Robert Fisch:

quote:

My name is Robert. I was having breakfast at
Joe Junior's in the West Village when a crowd starting to form outside. In
short order, we learned the World Trade had suffered some catastrophe.

After taking a look at the black gash in the facade of the building, I
abandoned breakfast and ran to my apartment across the street and grabbed my
camera. It was loaded and ready (I'd just gotton back from Florida
several days before).

I snapped a few pictures and saw the second plane in my viewfinder. I
snapped it instinctively. I had no idea it was going to hit the south tower.

quote:

My camera was trained on the towers when the second plane
came into view. The picture I took of the airplane should be in the repository.

As viewed from the north, the plane appeared to vanish. When the building
erupted in flame, I still had this "disconnect" in my mind and at first
refused to believe the plane I'd just seen hit the building. After a few
seconds when the sound wave reached us, it was fairly clear that was what
happened.

quote:

After my first shot of the fireball, I was frozen like I was in a trance.
Everything seemed to be happening in slow motion.

When the sound wave reached us (it sounded just like in the movies,
only not so loud---then again, I was probably 2 miles away)....it
brought me back to reality and I snapped this picture.

Fake troep. Of niet soms?

[ Bericht 0% gewijzigd door #ANONIEM op 07-05-2011 23:29:34 ]

quote:

Op zaterdag 7 mei 2011 23:41 schreef Lambiekje het volgende:

[..]

Ik post ff de conclusie:

5. Conclusion

As shown above, the US authorities have failed to prove that the 19 individuals accused of the mass
murder of 9/11 had boarded the aircraft, which they allegedly used to commit the crime. No
authenticated, original, passenger lists, bearing their names, have been released; no one is known to
have seen them board the aircraft; no video recordings documented their boarding; no boarding pass
stub is known to exist; and there is no actual proof that the alleged hijackers actually died at the
known crash sites, because their bodily remains were not positively identified (except for one
dubious case) and no chain-of-custody report accompanied these remains.
In the months following 9/11, reports appeared in mainstream media that at least five of the alleged
hijackers were actually living in various Arab countries.90 These reports led to speculation that the
86 ‘Remains of 9/11 hijackers identified’, BBC, 28 February 2003
87 Paul D. Colford, 9/11 parts split by good and evil, NY Daily News, 12 October 2005
88 Eve Conant, Nineteen hijackers died on 9/11. What should be done with what's left of them?
Newsweek, January 12, 2009
89 Andrew Pollack, DNA Evidence Can Be Fabricated, Scientists Show, The New York Times, 18 August 2009,
http://www.nytimes.com/20(...)rss&pagewanted=print
90 A collection of articles from mainstream media on the “living hijackers” is posted on
http://www.aldeilis.net/english/index.php?
option=com_content&task=category§ionid=10&id=97&Itemid=107
13
identities of some of the hijackers were in doubt. Typical of such reports is an Associated Press
dispatch of 3 November 2001, which states: “The FBI released the names and photos of the
hijackers in late September. The names were those listed on the planes’ passenger manifests and
investigators were certain those were the names the hijackers used when they entered the United
States. But questions remained about whether they were the hijackers’ true identities. The FBI has
not disclosed which names were in doubt and [FBI Director] Mueller provided no new information
on the hijackers’ identities beyond his statement to reporters.” The 9/11 Commission did neither
address at all these doubts nor the reports about the “living hijackers”.
On September 14, 2001, the FBI released the names of the 19 individuals “who have been
identified as hijackers aboard the four airliners that crashed on September 11, 2001”.91 On
September 27, 2001, the FBI released photographs of these 19 individuals. Withdrawing from its
unqualified statement of September 14, the new press release said these were photographs the FBI
merely “believed to be the hijackers of the four airliners”.92 Yet for most names no birth date,
birthplace or specific residence is given despite the apparent availability of such data on visa
application forms and other documentation possessed by the FBI. The FBI webpage provides the
following caveat: “It should be noted that attempts to confirm the true identities of these individuals
are still under way.” This statement, issued on September 27, 2001, is still valid today, anno 2008,
because the webpage has not been updated since it was initially posted and remains, therefore, the
US government’s official position that their identities are in doubt. Accordingly, a significant
difference exists between the official position of the US government, as reflected by the website of
the FBI, regarding the identities of the alleged perpetrators of the crime committed on 9/11 and the
popularized version parroted by politicians and the media about the guilt of 19 Muslims for the
mass murder of 9/11. The 9/11 Commission has studiously avoided the question of the alleged
hijackers’ identities. It must be added, however, that the aforementioned statement is deliberately
deceptive, because there is no hard evidence that any person actually hijacked the airliners and
crashed them on the known sites.
Not everyone is convinced that the above account disposes of the question whether or not Muslim
fanatics hijacked planes on 9/11. Some people claim that callers from the aircraft actually described
the hijackers as Arabs and even mentioned their seat numbers. Such electronically transmitted
evidence would have strengthened the official allegations if it had been supported by solid primary
evidence, namely that these “hijackers” had actually boarded these aircraft and died at the known
crash sites. Absent this primary evidence such secondary evidence cannot be considered as the
proof for the presence of these “hijackers” on the aircraft. Additionally, numerous questions remain
unanswered regarding the location from which the phone calls were made and their authenticity.93
Another recurring counter-argument is that a man claiming to be the notorious terrorist Khaled
Sheikh Mohammed, reportedly detained at the Guantanámo base, had confessed to be the
mastermind of the 9/11 attacks. Here again, in the absence of primary evidence proving that the 19
“hijackers” actually boarded the aircraft which they hijacked and crashed, such claims by someone
whose identity is shrounded in mystery and who was no eyewitness to the events of 9/11 cannot
supplant primary evidence.
More than seven years have elapsed since the events of 9/11. The U.S. government had in those
years sufficient time to prove the identities of the persons who allegedly boarded and crashed
airplanes on 9/11, if any. If the official account on 9/11 were true, the U.S. government, more than
anyone else, would have trumpeted this evidence in order to prove to the world, once and for all,
91 http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/pressrel01/091401hj.htm (emphasis added)
92 http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/pressrel01/092701hjpic.htm (emphasis added)
93 David Ray Griffin, Reported Cell Phone Calls from the 9/11 Planes, Global Research, September 7, 2008, at
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=10103; Rowland Morgan, The Impossible Phone Calls
of 9/11, Global Outlook, Issue #13 (2009), p.136-140.
14
who committed the crime. No one would have benefitted more from publicizing such evidence than
the U.S. government.
While it is theoretically possible that the U.S. government possesses the evidence that would prove
its accusations against the 19 named “hijackers”, such possibility becomes less and less plausible as
time passes. The total absence of evidence proving the guilt of Muslims for the crime of 9/11 gives
rise to the following observations:
(a) Due to the lack of evidence regarding the guilt of the 19 named Muslims for the crime of 9/11,
it is unconscionable to claim that Muslims (or al Qaeda) committed this crime. Any such
accusations or insinuations amount to slander and possibly racial incitement.
(b) In view of harmful policies pursued by the U.S. government on the base of allegedly secret
evidence, it is politically irresponsible to accord the US Government the benefit of the doubt by
presuming the existence, albeit hidden, of incriminating evidence against Muslims for the
crime of 9/11.
(c) The lack of evidence regarding the boarding of the four airliners that reportedly crashed on
9/11 and the failure of the U.S. government to formally prove its case, justify suspicion about
its complicity in the crime of 9/11 and its cover-up.
The crime of 9/11 has served to justify two wars of aggression by the United States, an indefinite
and global “war on terror”, the imposition of the PATRIOT Act, spying of the public, and serious
violations of international law. Many governments have colluded in these violations and endorsed
U.S. lies regarding the events of 9/11. The continuous reliance on the official account regarding
9/11 therefore threatens international peace and security. The above account should therefore
prompt all those who are concerned by human rights violations and the threat to international peace
and security, to join in demanding the full truth on the events of 9/11.
END
Elias Davidsson’s website is www.juscogens.org

Over het algemeen wordt hier aangenomen dat de meeste foto's die op 9/11 zijn gemaakt, gemaakt zijn door amateurfotografen en de Jan met de pet in de straten van New York. Echter, die foto's zijn moeilijk te vinden. Het blijkt zo te zijn dat de meeste foto's gemaakt zijn door professionals. Ok... en wat boeit dat? In New York verwacht je.. zoals Loppe subtiel probeerde aan te geven, dat er vele amateurs rondlopen. Toch lijkt het er op dat vooral de professionals hun plekkie al verworven hadden vanaf het begin van de aanvallen.

Hieronder een poging om alle fotografen op te sommen en daarbij weer te geven voor wie ze werken. Zien jullie patronen?

---------------

SEAN ADAIR
Founder of ADAIR film & Video productions. Consultant in digital media and visual effects.
http://911myths.com/images/9/9e/Flight_175_Adair.jpg
--------

BILL BIGGART
A photographer, who had worked for an alternative New York picture agency(?).
--------

MOSHE BURSUKER
BFA degree in sculpture and photography from the Hartford Art School at the University of Hartford.
http://911myths.com/images/9/90/Flight_175_Bursuker.jpg
--------

KATHY CACICEDO
Professional photographer.
--------

Christopher Casciano
Freelance Front End Web Developer. Sometimes Photographer.
--------

DEVIN CLARK
computer graphics animator. Clients: Comedy Central, MTV, TCM and HBO.
--------

ROBERT CLARK
National Geographic photographer based in New York City. Works with the world's leading magazines including Time, Sports Illustrated, French Geo, Vanity Fair, Stern, Der Spiegel.
--------

CLIFTON CLOUD
Events manager at Scharff Weisberg, Inc., a NYC-based video production company, whose slogan reads: “Whether you're looking to dazzle the ears, mind or eyes, we've got the latest equipment and the expertise to make it work for you.”
--------

LUC COURCHESNE
3D visual arts expert. Inventor of “Panoscope360”, a sophisticated 3-D installation which simulates “alternative life experiences”
--------

LUKE CREMIN
http://911myths.com/images/5/5d/Flight_175_Luke_Cremin.jpg
--------

RICHARD DREW
Falling Man picture - He was one of only four photographers in the kitchen of the Los Angeles hotel when Bobby Kennedy was shot and killed.
AP Photographer
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/0/05/The_Falling_Man.jpg
--------

CHIP EAST
Photojournalist for Reuters
--------

ARIS ECONOMOPOULOS
Staff photographer for The Newark Star Ledge
--------

EVAN FAIRBANKS
On 9/11, worked for KSK VIDEO STUDIOS, New York City: “Creative programming solutions for television, interactive and multimedia.” Photographer with world renowned Magnum agency.
--------

ROBERT FISCH
I was having breakfast at Joe Junior's in the West Village when a crowd starting to form outside. In short order, we learned the World Trade had suffered some catastrophe. After taking a look at the black gash in the facade of the building, I abandoned breakfast and ran to my apartment across the street and grabbed my camera. It was loaded and ready (I'd just gotton back from Florida several days before). I snapped a few pictures and saw the second plane in my viewfinder. I snapped it instinctively. I had no idea it was going to hit the south tower.
http://911myths.com/images/thumb/8/8d/F ... _Fisch.jpg
--------

Ruth Fremson
New York Times Photographer
http://graphics8.nytimes.(...)allenged/faces.6.jpg
--------

ANGEL FRANCO
New York Times Photographer
--------

KELLY GUENTHER
Pulitzer Prize winning photo-journalist whose work has appeared in The New York Times, Time, Newsweek.
http://graphics8.nytimes.(...)allenged/faces.1.jpg
--------

DON HALASY
New York Post photographer
--------

DAVID HANDSCHUH
Photojournalist for New York Daily News. Took picture of South Tower exploding right underneath it. No plane is seen in picture. He says he did not see any plane.

Handschuh followed a police radio call to the World Trade Center, where the first jet plane had just struck the north tower. He photographed the second plane as it crashed through the south tower, then felt the rumble of the collapsing building.
http://www.fotophile.com/news0009.html
--------

ROB HOWARD Photo of Flight 175 hitting WTC 2
Professional award-winning photographer.
Photo of Flight 175 hitting WTC 2
http://911review.com/pm/markup/docs/0305911-lead-lg.jpg
--------

JUSTIN LANE
New York Times Photographer
--------

JOHN LABRIOLA
Amateur photographer and independent contractor with the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey

For many people, cameras are like diaries—a means to record minor as well as important details of daily life. John Labriola used his Nikon CoolPix digital camera to make this amazing record of one survivor’s view of the events of September 11. His photographs show the calm before the attack, the drama in the stairwell as workers evacuated and firefighters rushed to help, the carnage and destruction on the street, and finally his return home.
....

A few floors lower water was flowing creating rapids down the stairs. This got worse as we got lower down. The stairwell led down to an outside door lined with emergency workers urging us to move to safety. There was debris and broken glass everywhere. The courtyard where this outdoor landing led us onto must have been blocked or too dangerous for us to cross because we were directed back into that second floor balcony again and down two escalators into the mall under Tower 1. Water was falling everywhere - 8 to 10 inches in some places. Many of the stores had windows blown out. All along the way emergency workers urged us to keep moving.

http://americanhistory.si(...)es/medium/62_115.jpg
http://americanhistory.si(...)ion/record.asp?ID=62
--------

CHANG W. LEE
New York Times Photographer
http://graphics8.nytimes.(...)llenged/faces.11.jpg
--------

CATHERINE LEUTHOLD
Independent photojournalist
http://blog.national911memorial.org/?p=1553

--------
SEYMOUR LEVY
Advertising agency art director
Amatur Photographer

Next I ran to my office at 100 Sixth Avenue, four blocks north of the Canal Street station, where being an advertising agency art director, and photography being my avocation, I keep a camera at my desk. I grabbed the camera, raced outside my building and started documenting the devastation on film. With my telephoto lens I was able to zoom in on the flaming towers. Then the screaming directly behind me began. "They're jumping, my God, they're jumping from windows!" I turned around and began focusing my camera on the horrified expressions of the onlookers witnessing the calamity.

I was transfixed to the spot when I next saw one of the towers begin to buckle. It was as if some enormous invisible hand was pressing downward, crumbling the building with its sheer power. In mere seconds, in an awesome cloud of pulverizing smoke, suddenly there was no more World Trade Center. I was witnessing the impossible!

I was able to capture these terrible few moments on film with quick succession photos.

http://americanhistory.si(...)upporting.asp?ID=621
--------

TODD MAISEL
Press Photographers Assoc.
http://www.nyppa.org/todd_911
--------

STEVE McCURRY
Magnum Photos
http://www.stevemccurry.com/main.php
--------

SUSAN MEISELAS
Magnum Photos

Photographer and MacArthur fellow Susan Meiselas is best known for her work covering political upheavals in Central America in the 1970s and 80s.
http://www.tcpalm.com/photos/2008/sep/03/110860/
--------

SCOTT MEYERS
From a video taken by Scott Myers. As found online.
http://911myths.com/index.php/Image:Flight_175_Myers.jpg
--------

ANDREA MOHIN,
Photographer
--------

SCOTT MYERS
ABC TV video technician. 3-D motion expert and software designer. Clients: ABC and US NAVY.
--------

JAMES NACHTWEY
Award-winning photojournalist and war photographer.
--------

NAKA NATHANIEL
Multimedia journalist at New York Times. Specializes in ‘desktop virtual news.’ Embedded with US military in war zones.
--------

NAUDET BROTHERS JULES AND GEDEON
Emmy award-winning filmmakers. Caught 1st and 2nd ‘airplanes’ and 'WTC7 ‘collapse’ on film.
--------

KRISTA NILES
Photographer
--------

THOMAS NILSSON
Swedish photojournalist in New York City. Works for Norwegian populistic tabloid VG.
--------

GILLES PERESS
Magnum Photos

Peress began working as a photographer in 1970, embarking on an intimate portrayal of life in a French coal mining village as it emerged from the ashes of a debilitating labor dispute. He then joined Magnum Photos, the prestigious photography agency founded by Robert Capa.

http://www.nytimes.com/specials/bosnia/peress.html
http://mybarrio.tumblr.com/
--------

MARK D PHILLIPS
Photojournalist - StellarImages Productions. Created PHORUM with five former staff photographers from the Augusta Chronicle. The company was an early innovator bringing digital technology to the corporate world. Freelancer for AP. Took picture of WTC 2 with 'devil' face.
--------

GULNARA SAMOILOVA
Worked for 9 years as ‘photo retoucher’ (in her own words) for the Associated Press. Award winning 9/11 photographer.
--------

JENNIFER SPELL
Director/founder with “SPELLBOUND” pictures. Independent television producer.
--------

ALLAN TANNENBAUM
International photojournalist now with Polaris Images. Author of "John & Yoko: A New York Love Story".
--------

CARMEN TAYLOR
Amateur - Tourist
http://www.beyondpolitics(...)p?f=33&t=539&start=0
--------

LARRY TOWELL
Acclaimed photojournalist and the only Canadian member of the prestigious Magnum photo agency
[urlhttp://www.we-make-money-not-art.com/wow/0aaindaruinesk.jpg[/url]
--------

AAORN C TRAUB
http://911myths.com/images/0/00/Flight_175_Traub1.jpg
--------

DAVID TURNLEY
Photojournalist - Director of Corbis Documentaries.
--------

PETER TURNLEY
Photojournalist (David Turnley's twin brother)
--------

JOE WOOLHEAD
Became a professional photographer on September 11th 2001 after capturing the events of the day and the following days- those shots were published all over the world and led to many more photo opportunities during the subsequent years, working principally with one of the prime photo agencies, Sipa Press. Began to work with Silverstein Properties in May 2004- from there, the work has snowballed!

------------------

References:

The Digital Journalist
http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0110/nachtwey01.htm

NYT - A Nation Challenged - One Year Later
http://www.nytimes.com/vi(...)1_FACES20_VIDEO.html

FACES OF 9/11 Online Newshour
http://www.pbs.org/newsho(...)hotographs_9-10.html

Casualties at WTC attacks include photojournalists
http://www.fotophile.com/news0009.html

United Airlines Flight 175 Crash Evidence
http://911myths.com/index(...)t_175_Crash_Evidence

Remembering September 11, Magnum Group
http://todayspictures.slate.com/inmotion/essay_sept11/

@Loppe: Waar zijn nu die amateurfoto's van de aanslagen? Wijsneus. Je kwam al eerder het topic in om mij in diskrediet te proberen te brengen. Lukt je dus niet.

[ Bericht 0% gewijzigd door #ANONIEM op 08-05-2011 00:09:17 ]

quote:

Op zondag 8 mei 2011 00:10 schreef Bankfurt het volgende:

[..]

Ja dit is fake.

Op de 2e foto zijn de Twin towers veel smaller, niet in verhouding met de zeer kleine verschillen in de afstand fototoesel-tower van beide foto's.

vgl ook de bijna ongewijzigde verhouding van de grootte in de letters van THERMO (rechtsonder),

Maar dat wist ik al...

Om ff met de taal van de jeugd van tegenwoordig te spreken... de 911 aanslagen zijn kankernep!

[ Bericht 3% gewijzigd door #ANONIEM op 08-05-2011 00:15:00 ]

quote:

Op zondag 8 mei 2011 00:16 schreef Bankfurt het volgende:

[..]

Het is wel nuttig om te onderzoeken JB, daar niets op tegen.

Maar het laat jou maar niet los, he ?

Wanneer ga je je eens verdiepen in het echte werk, bijvoorbeeld Haarp, mind-control of Alien bases on Mars ?

Ik was blij dat jij ook ziet dat die foto's zwaar fake zijn. Wellicht is het iets voor Hoppa om in zijn complotters + fotografie topic te plaatsen.

Het laat mij zeker niet los. Ik heb een hobby en die heet 9/11

Maar goed.. hetgeen jij het echte werk noemt, is voor mij op dit moment echt blabla.

[ Bericht 8% gewijzigd door #ANONIEM op 08-05-2011 00:23:01 ]

quote:

Op zondag 8 mei 2011 00:26 schreef Bankfurt het volgende:

[..]

Je zult toch eens moeten doorgroeien in je functie, JB.

ik ben ooit ook onderop begonnen in BNW met 09/11, maar het echte werk zit hem toch in de (fake)-aliens en forbidden science.

Dat zal best, maar voorlopig vind ik dat nogal blabla... zoals ik aangaf. Mocht ik daar ooit aan toe zijn, dan zien we dat vanzelf wel. Toch?

Edit: Al die ander zaken wil ik mij niet teveel mee inlaten. Ik wil beide benen op de grond houden. Heb ook een sociaal leven en een baan enzo. Die shizzle valt niet te combineren, dunkt mij.

[ Bericht 13% gewijzigd door #ANONIEM op 08-05-2011 00:30:25 ]

quote:

Op zondag 8 mei 2011 00:37 schreef Miezziej het volgende:
Er zijn toch veel ooggetuigen die de vliegtuigen hebben gezien?
Als er geen vliegtuigen waren, dan was dat toch vrij snel uit gekomen? Denk ik?

Bekijk de reactie van deze man eens als hem wordt ingeprent dat er toch echt wel en vliegtuig de toren in ging en let vooral op de reactie van de journalist:

quote:

Op zondag 8 mei 2011 00:38 schreef Bankfurt het volgende:

[..]

Ja, we zullen zien.

[..]

Dat begrijp ik.

Maar deze onderwerpen beginnen nu ook op de kantoren en gewone werkvloer door te dringen.

Met beide op de grond blijven staan wordt straks synoniem met de erkenning van het bestaan van aliens (ik bedoel hiermee niet de aankomende fake alien-invasie) en een totaal andere technologie.

Mocht dat gebeuren, dan zal ik zeker die aliens niet voor echt aanzien. Ik weet dat dit de rondte doet. Ik weet van alles wat er in BNW wereld leeft wel een beetje. Dus mocht het voorkomen, dan weet ik het iig... Voor nu hou ik mijn benen op de grond en ga ik niet mee in allerlei wilde verhalen. De 9/11 hoax is echter mijn overtuiging. Daar heb ik geen grammetje twijfel meer bij.

De rest is voor mij te ver gezocht of te 'zweverig'.

[ Bericht 1% gewijzigd door #ANONIEM op 08-05-2011 00:45:51 ]

quote:

Op zondag 8 mei 2011 00:41 schreef Miezziej het volgende:

[..]

Ah zo

Digitale beeldmanipulatie dus... brought to you by CNN _{en consorten}

quote:

Op zondag 8 mei 2011 00:47 schreef Bankfurt het volgende:

[..]

de 09/11 hoax is wel een voorbeeld van mind-control dmv media en mass manipulation, dus die stap naar mind-control heb je al gezet.

Hij is ook smerig duidelijk voor me. Heel vies dit!

Hey Hoppa... wat bedoelde je nou met:

quote:

Op zaterdag 7 mei 2011 20:05 schreef Hoppahoppa het volgende:

[..]

De facade wel. Het aangezicht (dat betekent facade namelijk) bestond voornamelijk uit glas. Het oogde als glazen wand, dat betekent dat.

????

Beetje Hoppahondenpoep in je ogen?

Edit: Neemt niet weg dat ik ook graag zie dat je mijn ander posts in dit deeltje doorneemt.

[ Bericht 3% gewijzigd door #ANONIEM op 08-05-2011 01:44:23 ]