Ik ben al 2 jaar lid op desteni, ben hen al gaan bezoeken in Zuid Afrika etc..
Het draait niet om geloof of geld of van die onzin. Alles werd voor mij betaald daar. Ze willen ook niet dat je hen gelooft ivm reptilians en die shit. Daar weet ik zelf ook niks van.
Maar ze hebben mijn ogen geopend voor wie we zijn als mensheid, en hoe de wereld in elkaar zit en hoe we dit kunnen stoppen en realiseren dat we slaven zijn in deze wereld van onze geprogrammeerde mind. Allemaal heel simpel te zien voor iedereen. Maar sommigen die te closed minded zijn zullen het meteen utiblokken, meteen in defence gaan, niet onvoorwaardelijk de info op de site en de videos doornemen enz.... ik heb dat wel gedaan, en daardoor begrijp ik desteni ook, en hun boodschap.
Anyway, hier een antwoord op een vraag over "taal"
"Desteni is een fake, iedere mayakalenderfan heeft veel werk van Ian Lungold gezien/gehoord, als je b.v. naar haar channeling met Ian Lungold luistert hoor je gewoon dat die Ian Lungold in haar channelings een totaal andere persoonlijkheid heeft, dus dit betrof niet Ian Lungold."
Voices only exists in the physical body. Once you are in the dimensions you communicate in sound. Expression in the dimensions exists in sound, there is therefore no more body language, or vocal expressions once you are dimensional. When the beings utilise the portal they utilise her body expression and vocal cords, they dmostly o not come with their own, unless that is what they whish to express.
As for the slight change in male/female tonality that is merely to assist each being to recognise 'oh yes that is Jack' or 'Oh i recognise Liili's higher more exitable pitch'. It assists us listening, to diffirentiate somewhat.
So in channeling in the past if beings came through with their earthly voices and mannerisms it was well to be frank 'all for show'. Imagine how dull it would be listening to somebody that came through speaking words of equality, oneneness and only expressed through the 'channelers' voice. People would have lost interest quite soon. So understandably we are not going to feed the needs of the mind.
What are mannerism but body behaviours connested to your minds interpretations of inner movements, meaning the body expresses what the person is experiencing within. So we have become accustomed to each being perhaps moving themselves according to acceptable ways and showing us what we understand? Therefore we need to see these beings express through the body, what about simply whatb they are saying...words, all in the words.
what is needed to communicate verbally to human beings. Where we access language is in the brain, and with the portal (and all of us) it's the same brain being accessed for language time after time - regardless of who or what may be operating it. Remember, it is a human body using a human brain (and vocal chords) to verbally communicate via language to human beings after all. Both hemispheres of the brain assist with different areas of language and verbal communication
Left [language]: grammar/words/pattern perception/literal
Right [language]: intonation/emphasis/prosody/pragmatic/contextual/cadence/
and...accent.
Observe the portal...the portal's body is more dependent upon the right hemisphere of the brain for verbal communication (the eyes look to the left - which means the right hemisphere is being active/activated - during times of accessing things not immediately available during speech). [And given that, I would guess that the portal is left-handed - not limited to writing, rather what hand to do you use most, for anything/everything].
[[[However (and I came back to edit this in here) left-handers, in terms of writing, are not used in studies involving handedness...its usually only right-handers...and its because left-handed people tend to use their right hand so much during other acitivities (because everything is basically made to favor right-handed individuals) that it messes up the study]]]
This also explains the tendency for eye movement the portal displays sometimes (some assume there are cue cards being used, and also (in general) sometimes we accuse people of “making things up” due to eye movement - and it is of course true that eye movement implies which hemisphere of the brain is being accessed (the prior accusation relying solely upon which hemisphere is used for “creativity”) - but again remember that during the process of speech we all access both hemispheres so that is a questionable accusation and cannot be proved due to eye movement alone. Going further with this, the hemisphere accessed more often for language, during verbal communication, is dependent upon the handedness of that body. I could guess the handedness of the portal's body by observing the direction looked in when searching for the correct words needed to communicate (this is when there is a change in direction from the straight-on-eyes-directed-at-camera eye movement going on with the portal every now and then - and it is nearly always in the same direction while accessing language) - you do it as well while verbally communicating, for instance when you get to that point where you can't seem to “find the right word”, study yourself and you'll take notice [refer to which hemisphere holds that particular data]...it'll be either a quick jump of eye movement to either the left or right and then a quick jump back to the prior fixed eye position, or it will be a longer 'stay' at the left or right - depending upon how long it takes to search for whatever specific of language is needed. Language and all of its annoying specifics and intricacies are basically just sitting in your brain, differing from slight to not-so-slight ways from brain to brain, ready to be accessed whether immediately or, well, not immediately.
How (pronunciation, slang, descriptive words, etc...language, period - and this goes for writings (typos, etc.) as well) is not attention worthy, it's a distraction at best...look further, past the words, and hear what is being communicated to you, and then understand why it is being communicated to you. I wouldn't waste time on visuals either, yet