'Anti-Christ's website

quote:

"Let Purpose Guide the Little Wills of Men: The Spiritual Impulse Behind the United Nations"
-- a talk given by Ida Urso at the Arcane School Conference, Saturday, May 13, 1995, New York City.

"Let Purpose guide the little wills of men" [1]. It is not a coincidence that we are celebrating both the 50th anniversary of the Great Invocation and the United Nations. Both in different ways are pivotal to the Plan and much as yet remains to be done before the purpose of either can be fully realized. Let us therefore utilize our opportunity today and continue to hold and deepen the group's spiritual tension. Let us together, complete the triangle of light, love and power and from this vantage point; let us contemplate that world body -- "the hope of humanity" -- which was conceived just 50 years ago under the impulse of the three spiritual Festivals (falling on March 28th, April 27th and May 26th).
Foundation of the U.N.

As the dream that arose from a nightmare [i.e. World War II], it gave hope to the world at a time when people were in despair. Pronouncing an end to the scourge of war and envisioning a world of justice, peace and progress for all peoples of the earth, the United Nations has been called humanity's most far-sighted and significant undertaking.

It was on April 25, 1945, two days previous to the full moon of Taurus and the Festival of Wesak [2], that delegates from 50 nations met in San Francisco for a conference known officially as the United Nations Conference on International Organization.

Appalled at the atrocities they had witnessed and the hell they had undergone, their mission was to create an organization that would forever end the scourge of war and serve as a mechanism for future peace.

Of this period the Tibetan Master tells us: "Not for nothing is this conference being held during the five days of the Wesak Full Moon. It will be a time of supreme difficulty, in which the Forces of Light will face...'the forces of selfishness and separativeness.'" [3]

The [Spiritual] Hierarchy kept a keen vigilance over the events of this period and especially over the conference in San Francisco which was of such significance that it called forth the attention of those great lives in Shamballa. We are told that:

"Year after year, ever since the Buddha achieved His goal of illumination, an effort has been made to increase the flow of enlightenment into the world and to throw the light of wisdom, experience and understanding into the minds of men. At each Full Moon of May this has been the effort of the spiritual Forces which are working out the Will of God."

In 1945, a supreme effort was made during the five days of the Full Moon from April 25 to April 30. At that time a great Triangle of Force was created as the nucleus through which the Forces of Enlightenment could work. The three Lives controlling that released energy were:

1. The Light of Life Itself; the Lord of the World,

2. The Buddha, the Lord of Wisdom, bringing spiritual light to the Hierarchy and revealing what is the divine purpose; and,

3. The Christ, the Lord of Love, presenting the demand of humanity and acting as the distributing Agent for the Forces of Enlightenment.

quote:

He Comes as . . . The Return of Christ
(Christian Prophecy)


The Time for Christ’s Return is now


The time for Christ to return is upon us. Most Christian groups realize this and have been preaching that Christ could return at any moment. That moment is now. All the prophecies are fulfilled.

“And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled…And then shall they see the Son of Man coming . . .” (Luke 21:24, 27).

Christ will come after Jerusalem is restored, and then the final Revelation of God will come. Jerusalem was restored in 1948 A.D. It was at this date that Israel was once again a free Jewish state and David’s fallen tent was brought back, just as God had promised it would be. Maitreya was born in 1944, several years before the fulfillment of this prophecy and evidence of Christ’s return.


Christ gave another promise about His return in the gospel of Matthew:

“And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come.” (Matthew 24:14).

The International Bible Society currently claims to distribute Bibles in nearly every nation in the world, and those countries that they do not cover are the Antarctic, the Middle East, and Australia, the latter of which is a Christian nation, and the former two have Bibles currently translated into their languages.


The International Bible Society boasts that in the years that lead up to the 1960's and shortly afterward it began an extensive mission operation, translating the Bible in well over 350 more languages than ever before and completing Christ’s promise in Matthew (to reach the entire world with the Gospel) around the year 1977 A.D.


Maitreya subsequently began to receive His Revelation from God in 1977, just as the Gospel of Christ had been spread to the entire world. In other words, God makes it clear in the Bible that Christ will not return with Revelation until after the period of 1977. This prophecy has been fulfilled.


Christ Promised He Will Return with All Truth

“And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever; Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you. I will not leave you comfortless; I will come to you.” (John 14:16-18)

As we will see in chapter fourteen of John, Christ gave two important pieces of information about His return: first that He would pray to God another Comforter (Christ), and secondly that the Spirit of truth (Comforter in other translations) is really Himself, “I will come to you.” Christ said:

“But the Comforter, . . .whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you… Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you… And now I have told you before it come to pass, that, when it is come to pass, ye might believe.” (John 14:26, 28-29)

This Scripture has three main points that we must look at. The first point:

“ . . . The Comforter . . .”

Christ clarified that upon His return (“I go away and come unto you”) who the Comforter will be and what He will do. One of the widely used titles for Prophet Muhammad is “Ansa’r’” which means Comforter or Helper (friend). It is also believed by many Muslims that when Mahdi returns, He will share Muhammad’s name and His titles. Maitreya’s birth name was Muhammad, and as we can see in the Islamic prophecy section and Maitreya's genealogy, Maitreya is also from the family of Muhammad and shares His title. So Maitreya in a very real sense is the promised comforter.


Although Christians believe that this Comforter is The Holy Ghost (“but ye know Him for He dwelleth with you, and shall be in you”), as we mentioned before, God’s Words have multiple purposes and meanings. This Comforter, as Christ returned, is most accurately represented by Maitreya.

“ . . . he shall teach you all things . . .”

According to Christ, the Comforter would teach the Christians the things they could not bear at the time of Christ’s Dispensation. How do we know that this Comforter is indeed Maitreya?

quote:

He Comes as . . . The Maitreya
(Buddhist Prophecy)

“At that period, brethren, there will arise in the world an Exalted One named Maitreya, Fully Awakened, abounding in wisdom and goodness, happy, with knowledge of the worlds, unsurpassed as a guide to mortals willing to be led, a teacher for gods and men, an Exalted One, a Buddha, even as I am now. He, by himself, will thoroughly know and see, as it were face to face, this universe, with Its worlds of the spirits, Its Brahmas and Its Maras, and Its world of recluses and Brahmins, of princes and peoples, even as I now, by myself, thoroughly know and see them” (Digha Nikaya, 26).

This prophecy by Guatama Buddha is very ambiguous, that is to say, it has very few details that allow us to probe into it and extract details that predict when Maitreya will come. But there are a few Buddhist prophecies that are more specific to the time when the Maitreya will arise:

“After my decease, first will occur the five disappearances. And what are the five disappearances? The disappearance of attainments [to Nirvana], the disappearance of the method [inability to practice wisdom, insight and the four purities of moral habit], the disappearance of learning [loss of men who follow the Dharma], the disappearance of the symbols [the outward forms, the robes and practices of Buddhism], the disappearance of the relics...”

“Then when the Dispensation of the perfect Buddha is 5,000 years old, the relics, not receiving reverence and honor will go to places where they can receive them... This, Sariputta, is called the disappearance of relics” (The Surangama Sutra).

The above passage clearly predicts, as so many other religions of the world have, that when society degrades and God (and His religion) are thought of as second to intellectualism, then the Savior will appear. Likewise, in the Bible, we find the confusion that must take place before the coming of the Messiah, and in THOTH we find an explanation for it:

“‘Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they also which pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him. Even so. Amen.’ (Rev. 1:7). ‘Cloud’ means confusion. He comes whenever confusion comes to humanity. ‘When righteousness is weak and faints and unrighteousness exults in pride [confusion], then my Soul arises on earth’ (Bhagavad-Gita 4:7). ‘Every eye shall see him,’ means that those who have their eyes opened (third eyes) will see him. ‘They also which pierced him’ means that those who pierced him will also see his glory. When it is said that he will come from the sky, the sky means the same as heaven, and heaven means Pure Consciousness. So he comes from Pure Consciousness, or he comes as an Avatar (god-man)” (THOTH, Revelation Of The Revelation, T1, V21-24).

quote:

He Comes as . . . The Mahdi
(Islamic Prophecy)


“You will invade the Arabian Peninsula and God will grant it. Then Persia and God will grant it. Then you shall invade Europe and God will grant it. Then you shall attack the Anti-Christ and God shall give you over to him.” The Messenger of God (Muhammad) was then asked, “Which of the two cities will be conquered first, Constantinople or Europe?” and the Holy Prophet replied: “The city of Constantinople will be conquered first” (Hadiths).

The above excerpt is from one of the Hadiths (sayings) of Prophet Muhammad. The Prophet was predicting what things must come to pass as a sign of the coming of the Day of Judgment. We should review these promises in their historical context one at a time, and we will see that everything God has said would happen, has happened.

quote:

Thoth -- "The first HERMES was the Intelligence or Word of God. Moved with compassion for a race living without law ... God sent to man Osiris and Isis, accompanied by THOTH, the incarnation or terrestrial repetition of the first HERMES; who taught men the arts, science, and the ceremonies of religion; and then ascended to Heaven or the Moon." [Pike, Morals and Dogma, p. 255, 17th Degree, Knights of the East and West; Emphasis was in the original].

quote:

Op maandag 29 juni 2009 11:39 schreef SicSicSics het volgende:
Over het algemeen krijgt de V.N. geen deuk in een pakje boter geslagen!

V.N. stemt tegen oorlog, Amerika begint oorlog.
V.N. stem voor ingrijpen in Darfur, niemand grijpt in in Darfur.

De groene hype aandragen als V.N. gevoerd... Ik weet het niet. Dat zou het jarenlange werk van alle 'groenen' een beetje teniet doen. Natuurlijk lobby'en ze. Maar dat doet iedereen!

Hoe weet je trouwens dat deze Maitreya een enorme invloed is in de V.N.?

quote:

The Spiritual Foundation of the United Nations

The Lucis Trust

UN Meditation Room The Lucis Trust is the Publishing House which prints and disseminates United Nations material. It is a devastating indictment of the New Age and Pagan nature of the UN. Lucis Trust was established in 1922 as Lucifer Trust by Alice Bailey as the publishing company to disseminate the books of Bailey and Blavatsky and the Theosophical Society. The title page of Alice Bailey's book, 'Initiation, Human and Solar' was originally printed in 1922, and clearly shows the publishing house as 'Lucifer Publishing CoIn 1923. Bailey changed the name to Lucis Trust, because Lucifer Trust revealed the true nature of the New Age Movement too clearly. (Constance Cumbey, The Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow, p. 49). A quick trip to any New Age bookstore will reveal that many of the hard-core New Age books are published by Lucis Trust.

At one time, the Lucis Trust office in New York was located at 666 United Nations Plaza and is a member of the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations under a slick program called "World Goodwill". In an Alice Bailey book called "Education for a New Age"; she suggests that in the new age "World Citizenship should be the goal of the enlightened, with a world federation and a world brain." In other words - a One World Government New World Order.

Luci's Trust is sponsored by among others Robert McNamara, former minister of Defence in the USA, president of the World Bank, member of the Rockefeller Foundation, and Thomas Watson (IBM, former ambassador in Moscow). Luci's Trust sponsors among others the following organizations: UN, Greenpeace Int., Greenpeace USA, Amnesty Int. and UNICEF.

The United Nations has long been one of the foremost world harbingers for the "New Spirituality" and the gathering "New World Order" based on ancient occult and freemasonic principles. Seven years after the birth of the UN, a book was published by the theosophist and founder of the Lucis Trust, Alice Bailey, claiming that "Evidence of the growth of the human intellect along the needed receptive lines [for the preparation of the New Age] can be seen in the "planning" of various nations and in the efforts of the United Nations to formulate a world plan... From the very start of this unfoldment, three occult factors have governed the development of all these plans". [Alice B. Bailey, Discipleship in the New Age (Lucis Press, 1955), Vol. II, p.35.]

Although she did not spell out clearly the identity of these 'three occult factors', she did reveal to her students that "Within the United Nations is the germ and seed of a great international and meditating, reflective group - a group of thinking and informed men and women in whose hands lies the destiny of humanity. This is largely under the control of many fourth ray disciples, if you could but realise it, and their point of meditative focus is the intuitional or Buddhic plane - the plane upon which all hierarchical activity is today to be found'. [Ibid. p.220.]

To this end, the Lucis Trust, under the leadership of Foster and Alice Bailey, started a group called 'World Goodwill' - an official non-governmental organization within the United Nations. The stated aim of this group is "to cooperate in the world of preparation for the reappearance of the Christ" [One Earth, the magazine of the Findhorn Foundation, October/November 1986, Vol. 6, Issue 6, p.24.]

But the esoteric work inside the UN does not stop with such recognized occult groupings. Much of the impetus for this process was initiated through the officership of two Secretary-Generals of the UN, Dag Hammarskjöld (held office: 1953-1961) and U Thant (held office: 1961-1971) who succeeded him, and one Assistant Secretary-general, Dr. Robert Muller. In a book written to celebrate the philosophy of Teilhard de Chardin (and edited by Robert Muller), it is revealed "Dag Hammarskjöld, the rational Nordic economist, had ended up as a mystic. He too held at the end of his life that spirituality was the ultimate key to our earthly fate in time and space". [Robert Muller (ed.), The Desire to be Human: A Global Reconnaissance of Human Perspectives in an Age of Transformation (Miranana, 1983), p.304.]

Sri Chinmoy, the New Age guru, meditation leader at the UN, wrote: "the United Nations is the chosen instrument of God; to be a chosen instrument means to be a divine messenger carrying the banner of God's inner vision and outer manifestation."

William Jasper, author of "A New World Religion" describes the religion of the UN: "...a weird and diabolical convergence of New Age mysticism, pantheism, aboriginal animism atheism, communism, socialism, Luciferian occultism, apostate Christianity, Islam, Taoism, Buddhism, and Hinduism".

http://www.lucistrust.org

You can find out much more about them and how they're involved with the work of the United Nations by following their link "World Goodwill" at the top of their home page.


The Aquarian Age Community

http://www.aquaac.org/

This Website is sponsored by the United Nations and the whole NWO philosophy is there. The page which explains the work of the Aquarian Age Community, as they call themselves, has this proud quote at the header of their page at http://www.aquaac.org/about/about.html

Such a grandeur is ahead!
Such a great step awaits a fiery affirmation.
Our teaching and the affirmation of the Higher
Principles will reveal so much that is great to humanity!
A great period is drawing near: Thus we do create together.

Fiery World
Vol. III, par. 149

Amongst the many 'enlightening' pages in this website, you can easily find 'fascinating' articles entitled:

"The New World Order and the Work of the UN" http://www.aquaac.org/un/nwo.html

"The World Spiritual Teacher, the Esoteric Community and the United Nations" http://www.aquaac.org/meetings/rttop.html

Preparing the Way for the Reappearance of the World Spiritual Teacher, the Work of the United Nations and the World-Wide Esoteric Community

http://www.aquaac.org/meetings/RT2001.html and many more articles.

This is not Christian theology but New Age paganism. You can also read the NWO quotes I posted, further down this page. Here's another by Curtis Dall, FD Roosevelt's son in law as quoted in his book, My Exploited Father in Law:

"For a long time I felt that FDR had developed many thoughts and ideas that were his own to benefit this country, the United States. But, he didn't. Most of his thoughts, his political ammunition, as it were, were carefully manufactured for him in advanced by the Council on Foreign Relations One World Money group... Brilliantly, with great gusto, like a fine piece of artillery, he exploded that prepared "ammunition" in the middle of an unsuspecting target, the American people, and thus paid off and returned his internationalist political support.

The UN is but a long range, international banking apparatus nearly set up for financial and economic profit by a small group of powerful One World Revolutionaries, hungry for profit and power.

The depression was the calculated 'shearing' of the public by the World Money powers, triggered by the planned sudden shortage of supply of call money in the New York money market... The One World Government leaders and their ever close bankers have now acquired full control of the money and credit machinery of the U.S. via the creation of the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank."

quote:

Op maandag 29 juni 2009 12:01 schreef SicSicSics het volgende:
Ik vind het wat moeilijk te geloven. Maar dat is misschien mijn 'blinde natuur'.

Zoals ik al zei is de V.N. nou niet echt een geslaagd 'One World, One Goverment' orgaan. Natuurlijk willen ze de wereld regeren, damn dat wil ik ook wel! Ze zijn er echter alleen nog geen stap dicterbij gekomen dan op het moment van oprichting.

quote:

Agenda21

Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts on the environment.

Agenda 21, the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, and the Statement of principles for the Sustainable Management of Forests were adopted by more than 178 Governments at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) held in Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992.

The Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) was created in December 1992 to ensure effective follow-up of UNCED, to monitor and report on implementation of the agreements at the local, national, regional and international levels. It was agreed that a five year review of Earth Summit progress would be made in 1997 by the United Nations General Assembly meeting in special session.

The full implementation of Agenda 21, the Programme for Further Implementation of Agenda 21 and the Commitments to the Rio principles, were strongly reaffirmed at the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) held in Johannesburg, South Africa from 26 August to 4 September 2002.

quote:

New World Order Rising?
Thoughts on the UN World Summit on Sustainable Development
by Steven Yates

Having begun on August 26 and continuing on through September 4, the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) in Johannesburg, South Africa is what may be the largest confab the United Nations has ever sponsored. WSSD commemorates the ten-year anniversary of the adoption of Agenda 21 at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil back in 1992. Over 100 world leaders, thousands of delegates, CEOs, representatives of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and other dignitaries and elites – over 20,000 people in all – have descended on the Sandton Convention Center in South Africa’s largest city. Moreover, as WSSD has approached the American public has been treated to a stready stream of new articles and so-called studies on how, if we do not change our ways and adopt "sustainable" behaviors and patterns of economic growth, environmental disaster (global warming, deforestation, extinction of species, etc.) is right around the corner. So the time has come to stop talking about Agenda 21 and take action.

What, exactly, is Agenda 21?

During the early 1990s a new set of terms began creeping into our lexicon; in addition to sustainable development or sustainable communities they included our global village, biodiversity, smart growth, habitats, urban boundaries, wildlife conservation zones, open space areas and many others. Many of the new terms seemed to involve local issues involving urban and suburban planning in one way or another; others (such as lifelong learning) were turning up in edu-speak; others (e.g., public-private partnerships) spilled over into business and still others (e.g., workforce development) seemed to cut across more than one area. Few Americans realized that the source of the new vocabulary words was the UN. Most have never heard of Agenda 21. They certainly aren’t going to learn of it from Dan Rather. This is a shame, because after the Bible and the Koran, Agenda 21 may be the most influential document in the world right now. It is definitely in the top five.

Agenda 21 is the bible of the sustainable development movement. A horribly written, longwinded tract consisting of 40 chapters of various lengths covering everything from land, water and waste management to urban planning to biotechnology, it purports to offer a comprehensive new paradigm for life on planet Earth. The basic idea behind sustainable development was spelled out back in 1987 by the little-known Brundtland Commission. The Bruntland Commission definition: "development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs." This innocent sounding phrase came to carry with it the implication that there are too many people living and working in an environment of finite resources to permit "unsustainable" economic freedoms. Behind the idea of sustainable development is the idea that we have a choice: adopt "voluntary" central planning (with the UN at the helm) to integrate economics and ecology within a globalist perspective or face ecological disaster a few decades down the pike. The United States has been a thorn in the UN’s side all along. Although President Bush has committed billions to every area the UN wants and committed the U.S. to involvement in 14 "partnerships," Uncle Sam still doesn’t give the UN as much money as the globalist bureaucrats want, and opposes such things as global taxation and the erosion of national sovereignty.

quote:

Waarom zou het ook geen Christian Conspiracy zijn om de Maitreya in een kwaad daglicht te stellen, bijvoorbeeld?

quote:

Het is een schop tegen nogal wat zere beentjes om alle religies harmonieus samen te voegen. Dan zijn er toch een paar mensen die een hoop macht kwijt gaan raken.

quote:

En dan nog:
[..]

Wat zou daar slecht aan zijn? Als het werkt en iedereen is gelukkig? Het is niet helemaal 100% zoals het beschreven staat in een subjectief boek wat vooral pleit voor zijn eigen straatje, maar is dat genoeg reden om wereldvrede te verwerpen en door te gaan op de oude geweldadige voet?

quote:

Op maandag 29 juni 2009 15:22 schreef _Led_ het volgende:
http://www.cracked.com/ar(...)hink-rule-world.html

quote:

Op maandag 29 juni 2009 15:04 schreef SicSicSics het volgende:
Ik neem je reactie even aan als sarcastisch, maar er blijven een aantal toch best serieuze vragen overeind:

- Waarom stemmen de V.N. tegen oorlog als ze gebaat zijn bij conflict?
- Waarom stemmen de V.N. voor interventie in een conflict als ze gebaat zijn bij conflict?
- Waarom heeft de V.N. effectief gezien geen zak te vertellen, althans ze verzinnen resoluties by the dozen die stel op sprong door alle betrokkenen worden genegeerd! Komt mij niet echt over als een krachtige nieuwe wereld orde. Sowieso is die orde nog ver te zoeken, maar dat was ook intentioneel, toch?
- Geloof je ook in de vrijmetselarij, Reptillians en de Bilderberg groep? Ik bedoel, kom op! Er zijn ook 100 websites die allemaal in dure taal uitleggen hoe die vork precies in de steel zit, ze passen alleen wat minder in jouw straatje.

quote:

Op maandag 29 juni 2009 14:58 schreef YuckFou het volgende:
Gaat dat niet over deze knakker?
[ afbeelding ]
[ afbeelding ]
en nog wat meer info over hem:
http://www.taracanada.com/MaitreyaAppearances.html
deze is wellicht het meest idioot:
[ afbeelding ]

_{almost 2012, we shall see who's right}

quote:

Op maandag 29 juni 2009 17:15 schreef YuckFou het volgende:

[..]

Ik zat op mn werk en heb random snel wat pics van google afgetrokken, de laatste waarin ie met Obama word vergeleken heb ik erbij geplaatst om aan te geven dat sommige mensen nogal doordraven (Lambiekje-style) als het op dit soort dingen aankomt
Wat ik me wel afvraag is waarom hij zich niet meer manifesteert als zijnde *de nieuwe leider* als hij dus al wel daadwerkelijk op de aarde rondloopt, moeten we eerst warm gemaakt worden voor z'n terugkeer? is het een fraudeur?

quote:

Ik heb geen tijd gehad je bronnen door te nemen, maar weet van je dat je meestal erg grondig te werk gaat, maar dan wel vanuit een christelijke visie die ik niet met je deel.
Ben jij ervan overtuigd dat dit de anti-christ is? Of juist de resurrectie van Christus?¨

quote:

Wel ben ik met je eens dat we in een noodgang op een one-world-geverment afstuiteren in een ongekende snelheid waarbij middel noch organisatie gespaard word om dat ene doel te verwezenlijken, maar wie er uiteindelijk aan de top gaat staan.....

quote:

Op maandag 29 juni 2009 18:24 schreef KoosVogels het volgende:
Maak je niet druk, Ali. Die Maiytreya is wel zo'n enorm wazig figuur, lijkt me niet dat er veel mensen zijn die hem serieus nemen. Ongevaarlijk dus.

quote:

Op maandag 29 juni 2009 18:53 schreef YuckFou het volgende:

[..]

Dan hoop ik dat hij geduld heeft, de bewustwording wbt onze planeet lijkt nu in het westen op gang te komen, voor dat die boodschap is doorgedrongen tot de miljarden nieuwe consumenten in het oosten zal er nog heel wat moeten gebeuren, en ik vrees dat het aaneen smeden van religies..men, als je ziet wat een bende ze er nu van maken, hoe zie jij al die mensen dan elkaar een handje geven en peace zeggen?

quote:

Ik geloof niet dat de paus de antichrist is, dat gaat mij te ver, ik ben meer van het idee dat de RK kerk z'n macht dermate hard ziet afkalven dat ze door een meer conservatieve koers te varen dan voorheen proberen de diep religieuze te behouden en de rest a;s verloren beschouwen, ik heb me nooit echt in de geloofsachtergronden van de NWO beziggehouden, wat er in de CFR etc. gebeurt houdt me genoeg bezig.

quote:

Denk je echt dat t zover zou kunnen komen, een figuur die hier en daar opduikt de troon van het Vaticaan zal overnemen * als de tijd rijp is* ? ik denk het niet, waar ik wel redelijk volhardend in geloof is dat in de archieven en kluizen van het Vaticaan meer duidelijkheid over dit soort zaken ligt wat angstvallig verborgen wordt gehouden.

quote:

Op maandag 29 juni 2009 18:55 schreef Oo-blackgirl-oO het volgende:

[..]

Klinkt als Obama

quote:

Op dinsdag 30 juni 2009 10:03 schreef Dragorius het volgende:
Wanneer kunnen we eindelijk een soort NWO verwachten? Zijn er ook pro-NWO sites? Serieuze vraag.

quote:

Op dinsdag 30 juni 2009 09:50 schreef Haushofer het volgende:

[..]

Kun je de desbetreffende bijbelteksten hier es neerzetten?

quote:

Op dinsdag 30 juni 2009 10:07 schreef Dragorius het volgende:
Maarja, dat duurt nog wel even dus helaas. Jammer, ik zou daar voorstander van zijn. Regulering is beter dan losbandigheid tot en met. Ruimte voor creativiteit, out of the box durven en blijven denken, dat kan heel goed binnen zo'n "NWO" (wat een kutwoord, pardon my French).
Al heb ik altijd wel zulke extreme ideeën gehad

quote:

Op dinsdag 30 juni 2009 11:27 schreef mediaconsument het volgende:

[..]

Dat heb ik nergens gezegd. Ik doel op de plannen om een wereldstaat te maken, daar valt een verplichte wereldtaal onder. Deze plannen zijn al in gang, sinds de wereldleiders hier al publiekelijk over praten. Het is alleen de vraag wanneer wij er iets van zullen merken. Makkelijk zal het allemaal niet zijn, het is echter wel goed om te weten wat er gaande is.

Wat ik me eigenlijk afvraag is dan meer of zon wereldstaat of nwo of whatever eigenlijk wel zo efficiënt is? Zeker gezien de huidige populatie van de aarde lijkt het me erg moeilijk om alle neuzen dezelfde kant in te krijgen. Dit kunnen we binnen Nederland al niet voor elkaar krijgen. Om deze reden is elk idee van een wereldstaat romantisch of crimineel.

quote:

Op dinsdag 30 juni 2009 11:45 schreef Dragorius het volgende:

[..]

Wat dan wel? Heb je de documenten hieromtrent in handen gehad?

Ik zeg > hoe eerder hoe beter. Een wereld, een (algemene) taal, een munteenheid.

quote:

LIBERTY OR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT?



By Michael Shaw

June 30, 2008

NewsWithViews.com

Chapter 1: Understanding Liberty

Who decides the terms of your life? Is it you, the individual? Or is it the state? Society has faced this core issue since the beginning of time.

If we resolve this in favor of individual rights to dictate the terms of one’s life, society must understand this:

Respecting individual dignity requires that we respect the private property of others.

These ideas are as old as the Ten Commandments which prohibit:

1. Stealing.
2. Coveting the property of another.

These principles came to fruition in society with the foundation of the United States of America in the constitution that guide and govern this country. In these institutions, the concept of self-governance is understood to be a necessary prerequisite to leading a life that is one’s own.

Americans know that something is wrong today. The American system of liberty is not being maintained. To fully understand this issue:

• We must learn to understand the nature of the problem,
• We must learn what caused it.

To do the necessary learning, we start with an understanding of what could be: We must understand the basics of liberty.

Liberty presumes that the scope of government powers must be strictly limited and the law must be equally applied to every citizen. In other words, for liberty to exist, governmental favoritism must be eliminated.

Freedom means individuals:

• Can act on their own authority.
• Have authority limited by their legal responsibility not to infringe on other’s right to life, liberty, and property.
• Have moral responsibility that limits their scope of rightful action.
• Have a social responsibility to work toward mutual benefits and productive societal gains.

Building a free society promotes the development of individual conscience. People in a free society, with nurture in a family environment, can become who they are. This system promotes general welfare. Healthy individual character development and positive individual personality expression require a developed conscience.

A person whose character is based on conscience is fully capable of constructive self-expression and of associating productively with others. The freedom to associate and the freedom to express are prerequisites to a person’s natural right to trade freely with others. Genuine free trade creates improvement as each party works toward mutual benefit. The result is a general rise to society.

Liberty and freedom promote and are a prerequisite to peace. However, genuine peace can only exist in free societies where civic responsibility is truly voluntary. Peace requires a system that is based on liberty.

Genuine peace cannot exist in a slave or serf society.

Liberty requires a self governance system. A self governance system of government is centered on the individual and is dependent on the family. Civilized government protects individual rights by exercising powers that are enumerated and limited. The enumerated powers primary design is to protect a citizen’s natural or unalienable right to life, liberty, and property. The alternative form of government uses force to direct the terms of individual life. When government’s force is not strictly enumerated and limited, ‘peace’ is no more than a symptom of society’s fear of government.


Advertisement

For genuine peace to exist, the right to determine the terms of one’s own life requires that we respect the property of others even if that is adverse to our own interests. Consider this example: A person wants to build a home on their land and neighbors object claiming that the new house causes ‘view shed pollution’.

Americans need to understand that if we focus on protecting our property value at the expense of another’s property right, we all end up without property values or property rights.

Respecting what others want to do with their lives and their property, providing one does not create a real nuisance for another, provides each person the opportunity to lead their own life.

George Washington said; “private property and freedom are inseparable.” Most Americans have lost an understanding of private property. Too many people think that private property is a thing; land, farm, maybe a car or a home. That is not the essence of private property.

Private property is much more than a thing. It is the relationship between a person and a thing. This includes the possession, use and right to depose of that thing. Property represents the liberty of a person’s action. The use of property and liberty of action is a necessary corollary to having your own life.

Let me illustrate:

• Your hands are private property.
• My private property includes, perhaps begins with my hand.
• I choose my hand’s action.
• Thus private property begins with our very person.
• Our person is private property.
• Private property includes a person’s thoughts.
• Private property includes a person’s expressions.

Private property includes our person, our thoughts and our expression. But it is goes beyond that. We have private property in our action. Private action is private property.

At times, our private action results in creating a thing. Other times our private action provides the opportunity to trade with others for that we want.

However, private property is much more than a thing which we hold title to. Our rights to private property incorporate our liberties. These are essential to living a private life.

Consider what happens when the use of something that is your private property is taken from you by an illegitimate use of government force. This example could include your land, home, business, bank account, book or the use of your hand. If our private physical property or its use can be taken from us, our lives, our action, our expression and our thinking become much different.

People in the Soviet Union did not act in a way that benefited society because there was no benefit for the individual to engage in productive action. If the benefit of acting in your own interests is denied by agents of force, your life is that of a slave and society is a controlled encampment.

quote:

The umbrella policy plan designed to ‘change’ everything from your backyard gardens to the national borders is called Sustainable Development (aka Agenda 21). Its main goal is absolutely not protection of the environment.

I know about the environmental fraud firsthand. I created one of the most environmentally profound native plant oases in California only to discover that the political environmentalists (of which there are many) could care less. I also sat on the Local Santa Cruz Agenda 21 committee in the 1990's. This program was promoted by the United Nations and Club of Rome along with many government agencies, non-government organizations and private foundations. The predetermined policies were created through phony consensus meetings. [See related articles: The Consensus Process, "Visioning" - Know What You Are Getting Into, How to Handle Predetermined Consensus Meetings]

After many years of intense study I have come to understand that these oppressive policies are being implemented not only in Santa Cruz, CA but all over the globe. There is plenty of funny money being printed to fund these programs. It’s also sneaky in that many different names are used to disguise the same programs.

In fact Sustainable Development itself has been around a long time. Prior to the phrase Sustainable Development these policies advanced under the Fabian Socialists, The Permanent Revolution, Communitarian Law, and the Communist Manifesto just to mention a few. Today we see such terms as equity, environment, economy and common good, etc….

America’s currency is being destroyed, taxes are ballooning, personal privacy is vanishing, private property is being abolished, a “global warming” scam is being perpetrated in order to further control people, and children are being indoctrinated to live as global citizens in ‘new world’ oppression.

quote:

How Global Governance Emerged
Print E-mail
Written by Henry Lamb
Wednesday, 29 October 2008 11:19

In recent years, however, the U.N. has been extremely effective in influencing U.S. domestic policy, more than people realize. Few people know that current U.S. land use policy is deeply rooted in, and reflective of the policies set forth in a 1976 document adopted by the U.N. Conference on Human Settlements . U.S. wetland policy is the result of the 1971 Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. U.S. law relating to endangered species is the direct result of the U.N. Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species. The Human Rights Commissions of the 1960s were created to comply with a variety of Human Rights treaties adopted by the U.N.

Article 11 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights gave rise to the 1977 Community Reinvestment Act which was expanded in 1995, to essentially require banks to make housing loans to unqualified people. This is the root cause of the current chaos in financial markets.

The concept of “Sustainable Development” came from a 1987 U.N. Conference on the Environment, headed by Gro Harlem Brundtland, former vice president of the International Socialist Party. The concept was codified in another U.N. policy document, Agenda 21, adopted in 1992 at another U.N. Conference on Environment and Development. This conference also produced the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change, and the U.N. Convention on Biological Diversity. These are only a few of the U.N. policy documents and international treaties that so heavily influence the laws, rules, regulations, and policies that govern every U.S. citizen.

Those who champion individual freedom, private property, and free markets find little to celebrate about the United Nations, and even less about global governance.

Too few people realize that many of the people and organizations that created the League of Nations in 1921 are the same people and organizations that created the United Nations in 1945. The League of Nations was created by Edward Mandel House’s “Inquiry” and Woodrow Wilson’s Democrat administration, with help from Alfred Milner’s “Chatham House Group” in Europe. Republicans killed the League of Nations in the U.S. Senate. House’s “Inquiry,” met with Milner’s “Chatham House Group” at the Majestic Hotel in Versailles in 1919, and decided to formalize their organizations. The Milner group became the Royal Institute of Foreign Affairs in Europe, and House’s group became the Council on Foreign Relations in the United States.

Plans for a new United Nations were well under way even before the Second World War. Two weeks after Pearl Harbor, Democrat President Franklin Roosevelt appointed a committee to plan for a post-war world. Ten of the 14 members were members of the Council on Foreign Relations. Since Roosevelt, virtually every administration, both Democrat and Republican, has been filled with members of the Council on Foreign Relations. The vast majority of cabinet secretaries have been members of the CFR. These are the people who appoint the delegates to represent the United States at the various U.N. meetings.

It is little wonder that the U.N. has had such influence over domestic policy when the very people who make the policy at the U.N. are members of, or are appointed by members of the Council on Foreign Relations, who work for the government, and are empowered to implement the U.N. policies they create.

When Barack Obama spoke to his audience in Berlin, he declared that he was a citizen of the world, and that he, as president, would comply with the requirements of the Kyoto Protocol. He has sponsored a bill to increase international aid to the tune of more than $800 billion, to comply with the recommendations set forth in the U.N. Millennium Declaration. There is every reason to believe that U.N. influence will continue, and even expand in the years ahead. U.N. policies are socialist policies. As U.N. influence expands, freedom diminishes.

Perhaps October 24 should become a day of national protest – not celebration. Global governance pursued by the United Nations must first erase the principles of freedom enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. Every U.N. policy adopted by the United States erases a little more freedom. Thanks to U.N. influence, there is not much freedom left to erase.

quote:

Op dinsdag 30 juni 2009 11:57 schreef Haushofer het volgende:

[..]


[..]

Waar je deze teksten op steunt Ben wel benieuwd naar de expliciete teksten hierover, ze zullen vooral uit Openbaringen komen, neem ik aan.

quote:

538 A.D. TO 1798 A.D.
A period of only 1260 literal days, only 3 1/2 years, falls absurdly short of fulfilling the requirements of the 1260-day prophecies in regard to the Papacy. But when, by the year-day principle is extended to 1260 years, the prophecy meets a unique fulfillment.

In 538 A.D. the Ostragoths abandoned their siege of Rome -- and this left the Bishop of Rome to excercise the perogatives of Justinian's decree of 533 A.D. the power and the authority of the Papacy grew, and grew, and grew.

Exactly 1260 years later the Papcy suffered its "deathblow."

The spectacular victories of the armies of Napoleon in Italy placed the Pope at the mercy of the French Revolutionary Government, which now advised that the Roman Religion would always be a persistant enemy of the Republic.

The government urged Napoleon to destroy the center of unity of the Roman church, and Napoleon did just that.

In 1798 the French general Berthier, with a French army, marched into Rome and proclaimed the political rule of the Papcy at an end and took the Pope prisoner. The Pope was removed to France where he died in exile.

The 1260 year rule of the Papacy was finished.

quote:

Possibly related terms

This one Antichrist is spoken of in more detail by Paul in 2 Thessalonians chapter 2.[11] Paul uses the term man of sin to describe what John identifies as the Antichrist.[12] Paul writes that this Man of Sin (sometimes translated son of perdition) will possess a number of characteristics. These include "sitting in the temple", opposing himself against anything that is worshiped, claiming divine authority,[13] working all kinds of counterfeit miracles and signs,[14] and doing all kinds of evil.[15] Paul notes that "the mystery of lawlessness"[16] (though not the Man of Sin himself) was working in secret already during his day and will continue to function until being destroyed on the Last Day.[17] His identity is to be revealed after that which is restraining him is removed.[11][17]

The term is also often applied to prophecies regarding a "Little horn" power in Daniel 7.[18] Daniel 9:27 mentions an "abomination that causes desolations" setting itself up in a "wing" or a "pinnacle" of the temple.[19] Some scholars interpret this as referring to the Antichrist.[20] Some commentators also view the verses prior to this as referring to the Antichrist.[21] Jesus refers to the references about abomination from Daniel 9:27, 11:31,[22] and 12:11[23] in Matthew 24:15[24] and Mark 13:14[25] when he warns about the destruction of Jerusalem. Daniel 11:36-37[26] speaks of a self exalting king, considered by some to be the Antichrist.[27]

quote:

Op woensdag 1 juli 2009 09:00 schreef KoosVogels het volgende:
Ik kan eerlijk gezegd geen concrete voorspellingen halen uit die verzen, maar dat zal wel weer aan mij liggen.

quote:

Op woensdag 1 juli 2009 09:44 schreef Haushofer het volgende:
Ik krijg er altijd zo'n bijbelcode-gevoel bij, waarover onder andere Michael Drosnin heeft geschreven. Op het eerste gezicht lijkt het nogal spectaculair, zo'n code in de bijbel waarmee je allemaal zaken ziet verschijnen. Daarna laat je de code los op Moby Dick, en blijken die voorspellingen toch niet zo specifiek en uniek te zijn. Mensen verkijken zich wat dat betreft heel gauw op dat soort zaken, en willen ook graag bedonderd worden heb ik het idee.

Hetzelfde met de voorspellingen van Nostradamus. Hoe groot is de kans dat er toevallig gebeurtenissen gebeuren die met een ruime interpretatie binnen zijn plaatje vallen? Ik denk dat die kans veel groter is dan je eerste ingeving zou zeggen.

quote:

Op woensdag 1 juli 2009 09:44 schreef Dr.Daggla het volgende:
De volgende paus is de Anti-Christ toch?

quote:

Op woensdag 1 juli 2009 09:46 schreef KoosVogels het volgende:

[..]

Maar is het niet zo dat de anti-christ niet als zodanig zou worden herkend? Anders gaat niemand hem immers volgen.

quote:

Op woensdag 1 juli 2009 09:54 schreef Dr.Daggla het volgende:

[..]

Moest even zoeken, maar het waren de voorspelling van Saint Malachy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prophecy_of_the_Popes

[edit]
Wat meer info
http://www.propheties.it/saintmalachy.htm

quote:

Op woensdag 1 juli 2009 22:06 schreef TjopClown het volgende:

[..]

En dan lees ik dat je gedood gaat worden, omdat je hem niet aanbid. En dan?