'Anti-Christ's website

quote:

Op dinsdag 30 juni 2009 09:50 schreef Haushofer het volgende:

[..]

Kun je de desbetreffende bijbelteksten hier es neerzetten?

quote:

Op dinsdag 30 juni 2009 10:07 schreef Dragorius het volgende:
Maarja, dat duurt nog wel even dus helaas. Jammer, ik zou daar voorstander van zijn. Regulering is beter dan losbandigheid tot en met. Ruimte voor creativiteit, out of the box durven en blijven denken, dat kan heel goed binnen zo'n "NWO" (wat een kutwoord, pardon my French).
Al heb ik altijd wel zulke extreme ideeën gehad

quote:

Op dinsdag 30 juni 2009 11:27 schreef mediaconsument het volgende:

[..]

Dat heb ik nergens gezegd. Ik doel op de plannen om een wereldstaat te maken, daar valt een verplichte wereldtaal onder. Deze plannen zijn al in gang, sinds de wereldleiders hier al publiekelijk over praten. Het is alleen de vraag wanneer wij er iets van zullen merken. Makkelijk zal het allemaal niet zijn, het is echter wel goed om te weten wat er gaande is.

Wat ik me eigenlijk afvraag is dan meer of zon wereldstaat of nwo of whatever eigenlijk wel zo efficiënt is? Zeker gezien de huidige populatie van de aarde lijkt het me erg moeilijk om alle neuzen dezelfde kant in te krijgen. Dit kunnen we binnen Nederland al niet voor elkaar krijgen. Om deze reden is elk idee van een wereldstaat romantisch of crimineel.

quote:

Op dinsdag 30 juni 2009 11:45 schreef Dragorius het volgende:

[..]

Wat dan wel? Heb je de documenten hieromtrent in handen gehad?

Ik zeg > hoe eerder hoe beter. Een wereld, een (algemene) taal, een munteenheid.

quote:

LIBERTY OR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT?



By Michael Shaw

June 30, 2008

NewsWithViews.com

Chapter 1: Understanding Liberty

Who decides the terms of your life? Is it you, the individual? Or is it the state? Society has faced this core issue since the beginning of time.

If we resolve this in favor of individual rights to dictate the terms of one’s life, society must understand this:

Respecting individual dignity requires that we respect the private property of others.

These ideas are as old as the Ten Commandments which prohibit:

1. Stealing.
2. Coveting the property of another.

These principles came to fruition in society with the foundation of the United States of America in the constitution that guide and govern this country. In these institutions, the concept of self-governance is understood to be a necessary prerequisite to leading a life that is one’s own.

Americans know that something is wrong today. The American system of liberty is not being maintained. To fully understand this issue:

• We must learn to understand the nature of the problem,
• We must learn what caused it.

To do the necessary learning, we start with an understanding of what could be: We must understand the basics of liberty.

Liberty presumes that the scope of government powers must be strictly limited and the law must be equally applied to every citizen. In other words, for liberty to exist, governmental favoritism must be eliminated.

Freedom means individuals:

• Can act on their own authority.
• Have authority limited by their legal responsibility not to infringe on other’s right to life, liberty, and property.
• Have moral responsibility that limits their scope of rightful action.
• Have a social responsibility to work toward mutual benefits and productive societal gains.

Building a free society promotes the development of individual conscience. People in a free society, with nurture in a family environment, can become who they are. This system promotes general welfare. Healthy individual character development and positive individual personality expression require a developed conscience.

A person whose character is based on conscience is fully capable of constructive self-expression and of associating productively with others. The freedom to associate and the freedom to express are prerequisites to a person’s natural right to trade freely with others. Genuine free trade creates improvement as each party works toward mutual benefit. The result is a general rise to society.

Liberty and freedom promote and are a prerequisite to peace. However, genuine peace can only exist in free societies where civic responsibility is truly voluntary. Peace requires a system that is based on liberty.

Genuine peace cannot exist in a slave or serf society.

Liberty requires a self governance system. A self governance system of government is centered on the individual and is dependent on the family. Civilized government protects individual rights by exercising powers that are enumerated and limited. The enumerated powers primary design is to protect a citizen’s natural or unalienable right to life, liberty, and property. The alternative form of government uses force to direct the terms of individual life. When government’s force is not strictly enumerated and limited, ‘peace’ is no more than a symptom of society’s fear of government.


Advertisement

For genuine peace to exist, the right to determine the terms of one’s own life requires that we respect the property of others even if that is adverse to our own interests. Consider this example: A person wants to build a home on their land and neighbors object claiming that the new house causes ‘view shed pollution’.

Americans need to understand that if we focus on protecting our property value at the expense of another’s property right, we all end up without property values or property rights.

Respecting what others want to do with their lives and their property, providing one does not create a real nuisance for another, provides each person the opportunity to lead their own life.

George Washington said; “private property and freedom are inseparable.” Most Americans have lost an understanding of private property. Too many people think that private property is a thing; land, farm, maybe a car or a home. That is not the essence of private property.

Private property is much more than a thing. It is the relationship between a person and a thing. This includes the possession, use and right to depose of that thing. Property represents the liberty of a person’s action. The use of property and liberty of action is a necessary corollary to having your own life.

Let me illustrate:

• Your hands are private property.
• My private property includes, perhaps begins with my hand.
• I choose my hand’s action.
• Thus private property begins with our very person.
• Our person is private property.
• Private property includes a person’s thoughts.
• Private property includes a person’s expressions.

Private property includes our person, our thoughts and our expression. But it is goes beyond that. We have private property in our action. Private action is private property.

At times, our private action results in creating a thing. Other times our private action provides the opportunity to trade with others for that we want.

However, private property is much more than a thing which we hold title to. Our rights to private property incorporate our liberties. These are essential to living a private life.

Consider what happens when the use of something that is your private property is taken from you by an illegitimate use of government force. This example could include your land, home, business, bank account, book or the use of your hand. If our private physical property or its use can be taken from us, our lives, our action, our expression and our thinking become much different.

People in the Soviet Union did not act in a way that benefited society because there was no benefit for the individual to engage in productive action. If the benefit of acting in your own interests is denied by agents of force, your life is that of a slave and society is a controlled encampment.

quote:

The umbrella policy plan designed to ‘change’ everything from your backyard gardens to the national borders is called Sustainable Development (aka Agenda 21). Its main goal is absolutely not protection of the environment.

I know about the environmental fraud firsthand. I created one of the most environmentally profound native plant oases in California only to discover that the political environmentalists (of which there are many) could care less. I also sat on the Local Santa Cruz Agenda 21 committee in the 1990's. This program was promoted by the United Nations and Club of Rome along with many government agencies, non-government organizations and private foundations. The predetermined policies were created through phony consensus meetings. [See related articles: The Consensus Process, "Visioning" - Know What You Are Getting Into, How to Handle Predetermined Consensus Meetings]

After many years of intense study I have come to understand that these oppressive policies are being implemented not only in Santa Cruz, CA but all over the globe. There is plenty of funny money being printed to fund these programs. It’s also sneaky in that many different names are used to disguise the same programs.

In fact Sustainable Development itself has been around a long time. Prior to the phrase Sustainable Development these policies advanced under the Fabian Socialists, The Permanent Revolution, Communitarian Law, and the Communist Manifesto just to mention a few. Today we see such terms as equity, environment, economy and common good, etc….

America’s currency is being destroyed, taxes are ballooning, personal privacy is vanishing, private property is being abolished, a “global warming” scam is being perpetrated in order to further control people, and children are being indoctrinated to live as global citizens in ‘new world’ oppression.

quote:

How Global Governance Emerged
Print E-mail
Written by Henry Lamb
Wednesday, 29 October 2008 11:19

In recent years, however, the U.N. has been extremely effective in influencing U.S. domestic policy, more than people realize. Few people know that current U.S. land use policy is deeply rooted in, and reflective of the policies set forth in a 1976 document adopted by the U.N. Conference on Human Settlements . U.S. wetland policy is the result of the 1971 Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. U.S. law relating to endangered species is the direct result of the U.N. Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species. The Human Rights Commissions of the 1960s were created to comply with a variety of Human Rights treaties adopted by the U.N.

Article 11 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights gave rise to the 1977 Community Reinvestment Act which was expanded in 1995, to essentially require banks to make housing loans to unqualified people. This is the root cause of the current chaos in financial markets.

The concept of “Sustainable Development” came from a 1987 U.N. Conference on the Environment, headed by Gro Harlem Brundtland, former vice president of the International Socialist Party. The concept was codified in another U.N. policy document, Agenda 21, adopted in 1992 at another U.N. Conference on Environment and Development. This conference also produced the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change, and the U.N. Convention on Biological Diversity. These are only a few of the U.N. policy documents and international treaties that so heavily influence the laws, rules, regulations, and policies that govern every U.S. citizen.

Those who champion individual freedom, private property, and free markets find little to celebrate about the United Nations, and even less about global governance.

Too few people realize that many of the people and organizations that created the League of Nations in 1921 are the same people and organizations that created the United Nations in 1945. The League of Nations was created by Edward Mandel House’s “Inquiry” and Woodrow Wilson’s Democrat administration, with help from Alfred Milner’s “Chatham House Group” in Europe. Republicans killed the League of Nations in the U.S. Senate. House’s “Inquiry,” met with Milner’s “Chatham House Group” at the Majestic Hotel in Versailles in 1919, and decided to formalize their organizations. The Milner group became the Royal Institute of Foreign Affairs in Europe, and House’s group became the Council on Foreign Relations in the United States.

Plans for a new United Nations were well under way even before the Second World War. Two weeks after Pearl Harbor, Democrat President Franklin Roosevelt appointed a committee to plan for a post-war world. Ten of the 14 members were members of the Council on Foreign Relations. Since Roosevelt, virtually every administration, both Democrat and Republican, has been filled with members of the Council on Foreign Relations. The vast majority of cabinet secretaries have been members of the CFR. These are the people who appoint the delegates to represent the United States at the various U.N. meetings.

It is little wonder that the U.N. has had such influence over domestic policy when the very people who make the policy at the U.N. are members of, or are appointed by members of the Council on Foreign Relations, who work for the government, and are empowered to implement the U.N. policies they create.

When Barack Obama spoke to his audience in Berlin, he declared that he was a citizen of the world, and that he, as president, would comply with the requirements of the Kyoto Protocol. He has sponsored a bill to increase international aid to the tune of more than $800 billion, to comply with the recommendations set forth in the U.N. Millennium Declaration. There is every reason to believe that U.N. influence will continue, and even expand in the years ahead. U.N. policies are socialist policies. As U.N. influence expands, freedom diminishes.

Perhaps October 24 should become a day of national protest – not celebration. Global governance pursued by the United Nations must first erase the principles of freedom enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. Every U.N. policy adopted by the United States erases a little more freedom. Thanks to U.N. influence, there is not much freedom left to erase.

quote:

Op dinsdag 30 juni 2009 11:57 schreef Haushofer het volgende:

[..]


[..]

Waar je deze teksten op steunt Ben wel benieuwd naar de expliciete teksten hierover, ze zullen vooral uit Openbaringen komen, neem ik aan.

quote:

538 A.D. TO 1798 A.D.
A period of only 1260 literal days, only 3 1/2 years, falls absurdly short of fulfilling the requirements of the 1260-day prophecies in regard to the Papacy. But when, by the year-day principle is extended to 1260 years, the prophecy meets a unique fulfillment.

In 538 A.D. the Ostragoths abandoned their siege of Rome -- and this left the Bishop of Rome to excercise the perogatives of Justinian's decree of 533 A.D. the power and the authority of the Papacy grew, and grew, and grew.

Exactly 1260 years later the Papcy suffered its "deathblow."

The spectacular victories of the armies of Napoleon in Italy placed the Pope at the mercy of the French Revolutionary Government, which now advised that the Roman Religion would always be a persistant enemy of the Republic.

The government urged Napoleon to destroy the center of unity of the Roman church, and Napoleon did just that.

In 1798 the French general Berthier, with a French army, marched into Rome and proclaimed the political rule of the Papcy at an end and took the Pope prisoner. The Pope was removed to France where he died in exile.

The 1260 year rule of the Papacy was finished.

quote:

Possibly related terms

This one Antichrist is spoken of in more detail by Paul in 2 Thessalonians chapter 2.[11] Paul uses the term man of sin to describe what John identifies as the Antichrist.[12] Paul writes that this Man of Sin (sometimes translated son of perdition) will possess a number of characteristics. These include "sitting in the temple", opposing himself against anything that is worshiped, claiming divine authority,[13] working all kinds of counterfeit miracles and signs,[14] and doing all kinds of evil.[15] Paul notes that "the mystery of lawlessness"[16] (though not the Man of Sin himself) was working in secret already during his day and will continue to function until being destroyed on the Last Day.[17] His identity is to be revealed after that which is restraining him is removed.[11][17]

The term is also often applied to prophecies regarding a "Little horn" power in Daniel 7.[18] Daniel 9:27 mentions an "abomination that causes desolations" setting itself up in a "wing" or a "pinnacle" of the temple.[19] Some scholars interpret this as referring to the Antichrist.[20] Some commentators also view the verses prior to this as referring to the Antichrist.[21] Jesus refers to the references about abomination from Daniel 9:27, 11:31,[22] and 12:11[23] in Matthew 24:15[24] and Mark 13:14[25] when he warns about the destruction of Jerusalem. Daniel 11:36-37[26] speaks of a self exalting king, considered by some to be the Antichrist.[27]

quote:

Op woensdag 1 juli 2009 09:00 schreef KoosVogels het volgende:
Ik kan eerlijk gezegd geen concrete voorspellingen halen uit die verzen, maar dat zal wel weer aan mij liggen.

quote:

Op woensdag 1 juli 2009 09:44 schreef Haushofer het volgende:
Ik krijg er altijd zo'n bijbelcode-gevoel bij, waarover onder andere Michael Drosnin heeft geschreven. Op het eerste gezicht lijkt het nogal spectaculair, zo'n code in de bijbel waarmee je allemaal zaken ziet verschijnen. Daarna laat je de code los op Moby Dick, en blijken die voorspellingen toch niet zo specifiek en uniek te zijn. Mensen verkijken zich wat dat betreft heel gauw op dat soort zaken, en willen ook graag bedonderd worden heb ik het idee.

Hetzelfde met de voorspellingen van Nostradamus. Hoe groot is de kans dat er toevallig gebeurtenissen gebeuren die met een ruime interpretatie binnen zijn plaatje vallen? Ik denk dat die kans veel groter is dan je eerste ingeving zou zeggen.

quote:

Op woensdag 1 juli 2009 09:44 schreef Dr.Daggla het volgende:
De volgende paus is de Anti-Christ toch?

quote:

Op woensdag 1 juli 2009 09:46 schreef KoosVogels het volgende:

[..]

Maar is het niet zo dat de anti-christ niet als zodanig zou worden herkend? Anders gaat niemand hem immers volgen.

quote:

Op woensdag 1 juli 2009 09:54 schreef Dr.Daggla het volgende:

[..]

Moest even zoeken, maar het waren de voorspelling van Saint Malachy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prophecy_of_the_Popes

[edit]
Wat meer info
http://www.propheties.it/saintmalachy.htm

quote:

Op woensdag 1 juli 2009 22:06 schreef TjopClown het volgende:

[..]

En dan lees ik dat je gedood gaat worden, omdat je hem niet aanbid. En dan?