H.A.A.R.P.

US Patent and Trademardk Office. US Patent No. 4,686,605 Bernard Eastlund August 11, 1987

Method and apparatus for altering a region in the earth's atmosphere, ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere

Abstract:

This invention has a phenomenal variety of possible ramifications and potential future developments. As alluded to earlier, missile or aircraft destruction, deflection, or confusion could result, particularly when relativistic particles are employed. Also, large regions of the atmosphere could be lifted to an unexpectedly high altitude so that missiles encounter unexpected and unplanned drag forces with resultant destruction or deflection of same.

Weather modification is possible by, for example, altering upper atmosphere wind patterns or altering solar absorption patterns by constructing one or more plumes of atmospheric particles which will act as a lens or focusing device.

Also as alluded to earlier, molecular modifications of the atmosphere can take place so that positive environmental effects can be achieved. Besides actually changing the molecular composition of an atmospheric region, a particular molecule or molecules can be chosen for increased presence. For example, ozone, nitrogen, etc. concentrations in the atmosphere could be artificially increased. Similarly, environmental enhancement could be achieved by causing the breakup of various chemical entities such as carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitrous oxides, and the like.

etc.etc.

The HAARP antenna array and transmitters were slated to be built in several distinct phases http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/phases.html

* Developmental Prototype (DP)
* (See http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/dp.html ) Filled DP (FDP),
* Limited IRI (LIRI)
* Full size or final IRI (FIRI).

See http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/fdp.html

During the Clinton administration, the "Filled Developmental Prototype" (FDP), namely a system composed of an array of 48 active antenna elements with connected wireless transmitters, was installed and completed at the HAARP facility in 1994. (See Figure 1 below) Under the initial Developmental Prototype (DP), only 18 of the 48 transmitters were connected.

Bernard Eastlund in a 1997 interview described this antenna array in its Filled DP stage as the "the largest ionospheric heater ever built".

This system of 48 antennas, however, while fully operational, was not according to Eastlund, powerful enough (in 1997) "to bring the ideas in his patents to fruition":

. "But they're getting up there", he said. "This is a very powerful device. Especially if they go to the expanded stage." (quoted in Scott Gilbert, op cit, see also http://www.emagazine.com/january-february_1997/0197currhaarp.html )

This 'final expanded stage' envisioned by Eastlund, which will provide maximum capability to manipulate the World's weather patterns, has now been reached.

Under the Bush administration, the main partner of Raytheon (which owns the patents) in the construction and development stage of the HAARP antenna array, is British Aerospace Systems (BAES), which had been involved in the initial installation of the antenna array in the early 1990s.

The multimillion dollar contract was granted by The Office of Naval Research to BAES in 2003, through its US subsidiary BAE Systems Advanced Technologies Inc. The contract was signed barely two months before the Anglo-American invasion of Iraq.

Using Raytheon's technology, BAES was to develop the HAARP Ionospheric Research Instrument (IRI) to its maximum capabilities of "Full size or final IRI (FIRI)".

In April 2003, BAE Systems Advanced Technologies outsourced the production and installation of the antennas to Phazar Corp (http://www.phazar.com/ ), a company specializing in advanced wireless antennas for military use. (Phazar owns Antenna Products Corporation of Mineral Wells, Texas http://www.antennaproducts.com/ ). Phazar was entrusted with producing and installing 132 crossed dipole antennas items for the HAARP facility. (http://www.antennaproducts.com/News%20Release%2004-18-03.pdf )

A year later, in April 2004, the final phase in the expansion of the HAARP facility was launched. (Dept of Defense, 19 April 2004). This phase consisted in equipping all the 180 antennas with high frequency transmitters. BAE Systems was awarded another lucrative contract, this time for $35 million.

In July 2004, Phazar had delivered and installed the 132 crossed dipole antennas including the antenna support structures and ground screen items at the HAARP facility, bringing the number of antennas from 48 under the FDP stage to 180. (see Table 2).

Meanwhile, BAE Systems had contracted with Jersey based defense electronics firm DRS Technologies, Inc in an $11.5 million outsourcing arrangement, the production and installation of the high-frequency (HF) radio transmitters for the HAARP antenna array. (See http://www.drs.com/press/archivelist.cfm?PRESS_RELEASE_ID=1529&preview=1 and Business Wire, 15 June 2004). DRS specializes in a variety of leading edge products for the U.S. military and intelligence agencies. ( http://www.drs.com/corporateinfo/index.cfm ).

Under its contract with BAE Systems Information and Electronic Warfare Systems in Washington, D.C., DRS is to manufacture and install "more than 60 Model D616G 10-Kilowatt Dual Transmitters" to be used with the HAARP system of antennas. (It is unclear from the company statements whether all the 180 antennas will be equipped with a transmitter, bringing the system up to full IRI capabilities).

Deliveries and installation are to be completed by July 2006. While HAARP is described as a "research project", the production of the transmitters was entrusted to DRS' C41 "Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence (C4I) Group"

HAARP has been operational since the early 1990s. Its system of antennas at Gakona, Alaska, was initially based on a technology patented by Advanced Power Technologies Inc. (APTI), a subsidiary of Atlantic Ritchfield Corporation (ARCO). The first phase of the HAARP Ionospheric Research Instrument (IRI) was completed by APTI. The IRI system of antennas was first installed in 1992 by a subsidiary of British Aerospace Systems (BAES) using the APTI patent. The antennas beam into the outer-atmosphere using a set of wireless high frequency transmitters.

In 1994, ARCO sold its APTI subsidiary, including the patents and the second phase construction contract to E-Systems, a secretive high tech military outfit with links to the CIA (http://www.crystalinks.com/haarp.html ).

E-Systems specializes in the production of electronic warfare equipment, navigation and reconnaissance machinery, including "highly sophisticated spying devices":

"[E-Systems] is one of the biggest intelligence contractors in the world, doing work for the CIA, defense intelligence organizations, and others. US$1.8 billion of their annual sales are to these organizations, with $800 million for black projects-projects so secret that even the United States Congress isn't told how the money is being spent.( http://www.earthpulse.com/haarp/vandalism.html )

"The company has outfitted such military projects as the Doomsday Plan (the system that allows the President to manage a nuclear war) and Operation Desert Storm." (Princeton Review, http://www.princetonrevie(...)asp?internshipID=998 )

With the purchase of APTI, E-Systems acquired the strategic weather warfare technology and patent rights, including Bernard J. Eastlund's US Patent No: 4,686,605 entitled "Method and Apparatus for Altering a Region in the Earth's Atmosphere, Ionosphere and/or Magnetosphere".

It is worth mentioning that the Eastlund /APTI patents were based on the research of Yugoslav scientist Nicola Tesla (many of whose ideas were stolen by US corporations). (See Scott Gilbert, Environmental Warfare and US Foreign Policy: The Ultimate Weapon of Mass Destruction, http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/GIL401A.html )

Eastlund described this deadly technology as capable of:

"causing�total disruption of communications over a very large portion of the Earth�missile or aircraft destruction, deflection or confusion� weather modification�" ( http://www.wealth4freedom.com/truth/12/HAARP.htm ),

Not surprisingly, the patent had previously been sealed under a government secrecy order.

Barely a year following the E-Systems purchase of APTI's weather warfare technology, E-Systems was bought out by Raytheon, the fourth largest US military contractor. Through this money-spinning acquisition, Raytheon became the largest "defense electronics" firm in the World.

Meanwhile, ARCO which had sold APTI to E-Systems, had itself been acquired by the BP-AMOCO oil consortium, thereby integrating the largest oil company in the World (BP).

Raytheon through its E-Systems subsidiary now owns the patents used to develop the HAARP weather warfare facility at Gakona Alaska. Raytheon is also involved in other areas of weather research for military use, including the activities of its subsidiary in Antarctica, Raytheon Polar Services.

a report published by the Russian parliament (Duma) in 2002, suggests that the US Military had plans to test its weather modification techniques at its Alaska facility, as well as at two other sites:

"The committees reported that the USA is planning to test three facilities of this kind. One of them is located on the military testing ground in Alaska and its full-scale tests are to begin in early 2003. The second one is in Greenland and the third one in Norway.

"When these facilities are launched into space from Norway, Alaska and Greenland, a closed contour will be created with a truly fantastic integral potential for influencing the near-Earth medium," the State Duma said.

The USA plans to carry out large-scale scientific experiments under the HAARP program, and not controlled by the global community, will create weapons capable of breaking radio communication lines and equipment installed on spaceships and rockets, provoke serious accidents in electricity networks and in oil and gas pipelines and have a negative impact on the mental health of people populating entire regions, the deputies said. (Interfax News Agency, original Russian, BBC Monitoring, 8 August 2002, emphasis added)

Op dinsdag 4 april 2006 20:05 schreef -skippybal- het volgende:
TVP _{wel heel veel tekst}

Op dinsdag 4 april 2006 20:04 schreef Bijsmaak het volgende:
Hmmmm, klinkt nog ambitieuzer dan die Star-Wars program. Volgens is het technologisch en financieel nog niet haalbaar.

Op dinsdag 4 april 2006 20:12 schreef thedude0 het volgende:
Dat ding staat er natuurlijk niet voor niets dus waarschijnlijk zijn ze er al lang mee bezig om dingen naar de tyfus te helpen.

Op dinsdag 4 april 2006 21:55 schreef Martijn_77 het volgende:

[..]

Zijn daar al bewijzen voor dan?

"WEATHER WARFARE"

World renowned scientist Dr. Rosalie Bertell confirms that "US military scientists ... are working on weather systems as a potential weapon. The methods include the enhancing of storms and the diverting of vapor rivers in the Earth's atmosphere to produce targeted droughts or floods." (2) Already in the 1970s, former National Security advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski had foreseen in his book "Between Two Ages" that:

"Technology will make available, to the leaders of major nations, techniques for conducting secret warfare, of which only a bare minimum of the security forces need be appraised... [T]echniques of weather modification could be employed to produce prolonged periods of drought or storm."

Marc Filterman, a former French military officer, outlines several types of "unconventional weapons" using radio frequencies. He refers to "weather war," indicating that the U.S. and the Soviet Union had already "mastered the know-how needed to unleash sudden climate changes (hurricanes, drought) in the early 1980s."(3) These technologies make it "possible to trigger atmospheric disturbances by using Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) radar [waves]." (4)

A simulation study of future defense "scenarios" commissioned for the US Air Force calls for:

"US aerospace forces to 'own the weather' by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to war-fighting applications... From enhancing friendly operations or disrupting those of the enemy via small-scale tailoring of natural weather patterns to complete dominance of global communications and counterspace control, weather-modification offers the war fighter a wide-range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary... In the United States, weather-modification will likely become a part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications. Our government will pursue such a policy, depending on its interests, at various levels.(5)
_bron

Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025
In 2025, US aerospace forces can “own the weather,” as they “own the night”
now. Though a high-risk effort, the investment to do so would pay high rewards.
Weather modification offers both the commercial sector and the military greatly
enhanced capabilities. For this to occur, technology advancements in five major areas are
necessary. These are advanced nonlinear modeling techniques, computational capability,
information gathering and transmission, a global sensor array, and weather intervention
techniques. All of these will be greatly enhanced as we approach 2025. Current
demographic, economic, and environmental trends will create global stresses that create
the necessary impetus for weather modification to become a reality in the commercial
sector. Its application in the military arena is a natural development as well.
Weather modification will become a part of domestic and international security
and could be done unilaterally, through alliance networks—particularly regional ones—or
through an ad hoc coalition or a UN framework. It could have offensive and defensive
applications and even be used for deterrence purposes. The ability to generate
precipitation, fog, and storms on earth or to modify space weather, improve

_bron

Unusual Weather Patterns (2003-2004)

Alex, Ivan, Frances, Charley and Jeanne (August-September 2004): Four destructive hurricanes and a tropical rain storm occur in a sequence, within a short period of time. Unprecedented in hurricane history in the Caribbean, the island of Grenada is completely devastated: 37 people died and roughly two-thirds of the island's 100,000 inhabitants have been left homeless, in Haiti, more than two thousand people have died and tens of thousands have been made homeless. The Dominican Republic, Jamaica, Cuba and the Bahamas have also been devastated.

In the US, the damage hitting several Southern states including Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi and the Carolinas is the highest in US history.

Brazil March 2004: The first-ever hurricane formed in the South Atlantic, striking Brazil with 90 mph winds and causing up to a dozen deaths. "Meteorologists were left scratching their heads in bewilderment as the familiar swirl of clouds, complete with a well-defined eye, appeared in an oceanic basin where none had been spotted before." (WP, 19 September 2004, See also http://www.climate.org/topics/climate/brazil_hurricane.shtml )

Japan, China and the Korean Peninsula: "Japan has suffered its highest number of typhoon strikes on record, and the storms -- which hit at the rate of one a week for much of the summer -- wreaked havoc in Taiwan, China and the Korean Peninsula." (ibid)

China (August 2004): Typhoon Rananim, the worst in 48 years, has killed at least 164 people and injured more than 1800 in China's Zhejiang province. Rananim is confirmed by China's meteorological authorities to be the strongest to hit the Chinese mainland since 1956. It is estimated to have disrupted the life of some 13 million people, http://www.cma.gov.cn/ywwz/englishread.php?recid=39616

United States May 2003 : 562 tornadoes hit the United States, the highest in recorded history, far exceeding the previous monthly peak of 399 in June 1992.(CNN, July 3, 2003, http://www.cnn.com/2003/WEATHER/07/03/wmo.extremes/ )

India, early 2003: a pre-monsoon heat wave caused peak temperatures of between 45 and 49 degrees Celsius (113 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit), killing more than 1400 people.(Ibid)

Sri Lanka, "heavy rainfalls from Tropical Cyclone 01B exacerbated already wet conditions, causing flooding and landslides and more than 300 fatalities." (Ibid)

Western Europe Summer 2003: experienced extremely high Summer temperatures. "Switzerland experienced its hottest June [2003] in at least 250 years while in the south of France average temperatures were between 5 and 7 degrees Celsius (9 to 13 degrees Fahrenheit) warmer than the long term average. England and Wales also experienced their hottest month since 1976." (Ibid)
_bron

Extreme weather on the rise

Thursday, July 3, 2003 Posted: 4:38 AM EDT (0838 GMT)

(CNN) -- Anecdotal evidence that the world's weather is getting wilder now has a solid scientific basis in fact following a dramatic global assessment from the World Meteorological Organization.

A study released Wednesday by the WMO -- a specialized climate science agency of the United Nations -- says the world is experiencing record numbers of extreme weather events, such as droughts and tornadoes.

Laying the blame firmly at the feet of global warming, the agency warned that the number and intensity of extreme weather events could continue to increase.

Citing examples, the WMO said the 562 tornadoes which hit the United States in May this year was a record -- far higher than the previous monthly peak of 399 in June 1992.

Far colder and wetter conditions than normal also prevailed in the eastern and southeastern part of the U.S. for much of May and June.

And a pre-monsoon heatwave which hit India earlier this year caused peak temperatures of between 45 and 49 degrees Celsius (113 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit), killing more than 1400 people.

In Sri Lanka, heavy rainfalls from Tropical Cyclone 01B exacerbated already wet conditions, causing flooding and landslides and more than 300 fatalities.

Last month Switzerland experienced its hottest June in at least 250 years while in the south of France average temperatures were between 5 and 7 degrees Celsius (9 to 13 degrees Fahrenheit) warmer than the long term average.

England and Wales also experienced their hottest month since 1976.

On their own none of these events is truly remarkable. But when viewed together they represent a clear and alarming trend towards wilder weather, according to the WMO.

"These record extreme events [high temperatures, low temperatures and high rainfall amounts and droughts] all go into calculating the monthly and annual averages which, for temperatures, have been gradually increasing over the past 100 years," the WMO said in its statement.
Warning

The WMO normally confines itself to issuing scientific reports and statistics compiled from climate data.

However, the weather events of 2003 had proved so remarkable, officials say the organization felt compelled to issue a generalized warning of the emerging pattern.

The WMO said new analysis of data for the northern hemisphere showed the increase in temperature in the 20th century was likely to have been the largest in any century during the past 1,000 years.

"It is also likely that, in the northern hemisphere, the 1990s were the warmest decade and 1998 the warmest year," it said.

"While the trend towards warmer globally averaged surface temperatures has been uneven over the course of the last century, the trend for the period since 1976 is roughly three times that for the past 100 years as a whole.

"Global average land and sea surface temperatures in May 2003 were the second highest since records began in 1880," the WMO warned.

Last year much of Australia was hit by the longest drought in recorded history, which devastated crop yields and sparked continual bushfires which threatened major cities.

Conversely, many parts of China and East Asia were hit by severe flooding resulting in thousands of deaths.
_bron

�
U.S. Senate Bill 517 and U.S. House Bill 2995, a bill that would allow experimental weather modification by artificial methods and implement a national weather modification policy, is on the "fast track" to be passed early in 2006.
�

�
The Alaska H.A.A.R.P. atmospheric heating program may have the capability of changing the Jet Stream which could also change our weather.
�

�
Trimethyl Aluminum (TMA) and barium are just two of the toxic chemicals used in recent atmospheric heating and testing programs according to NASA.
�

Op dinsdag 4 april 2006 19:59 schreef YuckFou het volgende:

donder op met je conspiracy verhalen, dit is NWS...

Op dinsdag 4 april 2006 23:36 schreef Drugshond het volgende:

Ergens zou ik hem wel in [NWS] willen hebben, maar er zijn geen actuele links in de media die teruggrijpen naar H.A.A.R.P. Hoe dan ook, ik wil graag dit topic blijven volgen.

Senate Floor Speech
Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison
March 4, 2004 -- Page: S2232
MRS. HUTCHISON. Mr. President, I rise to introduce legislation to recognize the importance and need for increased weather modification research. Weather modification is the general term that refers to any human attempt to alter the weather. While we may not be able to stop Mother Nature entirely, we can sometimes alter her course, changing the weather in small, yet significant ways. These efforts have been used in the U.S. for more than 50 years to reduce crop and property damage, optimize useable precipitation during growing seasons and lessen the impact of periodic, often severe droughts.

The weather modification projects in Texas and other States in the U.S. are much more than well considered responses to drought. They are trying to use the latest technological developments in the science to chemically squeeze more precipitation out of clouds. Moisture that is needed to replenish fresh-water supplies in aquifers and reservoirs. Political subdivisions like water conservation districts and county commissions have embraced the technology of rain enhancement as one element of a long-term, water-management strategy. This is critical to ensure growing populations have enough water to meet future needs.

This bill will develop a comprehensive and coordinated national weather modification policy through federal and state research and development programs. It will also establish a Weather Modification Advisory and Research Board within the Department of Commerce to promote and expand the practical knowledge of weather modification. Further, it recognizes the significance of state and federal collaboration in this endeavor.

I am proud to offer this legislation to bring attention to this important research and I would urge my colleagues to support the Weather Modification Research and Technology Transfer Authorization Act.

Op woensdag 5 april 2006 00:10 schreef Dagonet het volgende:
Is dit wat Crichton beschreef in zijn boek State of Fear?

Op woensdag 5 april 2006 00:07 schreef YuckFou het volgende:

[..]

Tja ze gaan er dus een instituut voor overeind zetten en al...waarom lees je hier in de media niks over? het gaat godverdomme om 'het weer' en met die miljard watt in Alaska niet zo'n beetje ook...

Op woensdag 5 april 2006 00:11 schreef Evil_Jur het volgende:

[..]

Nee, die gebruikten een experimentele tunnelmethode.

Op woensdag 5 april 2006 00:22 schreef Dagonet het volgende:

[..]

Dat met die bliksems? Ah, kay, maar duidelijker voor mij nu.

Op woensdag 5 april 2006 00:11 schreef Evil_Jur het volgende:

[..]

Nee, die gebruikten een experimentele tunnelmethode.

Op woensdag 5 april 2006 10:17 schreef RickySway het volgende:
Ik hoop dat dit waar is.

U heeft via de KNMI-internetsite contact gezocht met
de Klimatologische Dienst van het KNMI.
Uw naam is:
YuckFou
Uw emailadres is:
xxxxxxx@zonnet.nl
Het onderwerp van uw vraag is:
HAARP
Uw vraag is:
LS, Tijdens het surfen op internet ben ik op een link betreffende HAARP (http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/index.html) gestuit en ben behoorlijk geschrokken van wat ik daarover heb gelezen, een installatie die capabel is tot weersmodificatie? Ik maak me hier grote zorgen over en vroeg me dan ook af of het KNMI van het bestaan hiervan op de hoogte is en wat het standpunt betreffende weersmodificatie van het KNMI is. in afwachting van uw antwoord, met vriendelijke groet,
YuckFou

Op woensdag 5 april 2006 11:13 schreef YuckFou het volgende:

[..]

als je op de allereerste link in de OP klikt kom je op de officiele HAARP site uit, hoe echter wil je het hebben?

Op woensdag 5 april 2006 15:42 schreef RickySway het volgende:

[..]

laat ik duidelijker zijn: ik hoop dat dit waar is. Dat HAARP bestaat zoals het in de ogen van conspiracytheorists bestaat: als dreigend apocolyps-wapen in handen van een rijkeluiszoontjesclub die te veel horrorfilms gezien hebben.

en die allereerste link in de OP leidt naar de officiele website, waarin toch echt duidelijk staat dat HAARP als doel heeft om COMMUNICATIE in de ionensfeer te verbeteren. voor sattelieten en stuff.....

Op dinsdag 4 april 2006 23:09 schreef NorthernStar het volgende:
Op dit moment zijn er twee wetten in voorbereiding in Amerika.

quote:

U.S. Senate Bill 517 and U.S. House Bill 2995, a bill that would allow experimental weather modification by artificial methods and implement a national weather modification policy, is on the "fast track" to be passed early in 2006.

HAARP is hier rechtstreeks bij betrokken

quote:

The Alaska H.A.A.R.P. atmospheric heating program may have the capability of changing the Jet Stream which could also change our weather.

Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison
March 4, 2004 -- Page: S2232
MRS. HUTCHISON. Mr. President, I rise to introduce legislation to recognize the importance and need for increased weather modification research. Weather modification is the general term that refers to any human attempt to alter the weather. While we may not be able to stop Mother Nature entirely, we can sometimes alter her course, changing the weather in small, yet significant ways. These efforts have been used in the U.S. for more than 50 years to reduce crop and property damage, optimize useable precipitation during growing seasons and lessen the impact of periodic, often severe droughts.

- de installatie is in staat 3,6 MegaWatt aan radiogolven te genereren, de antenne opstelling bundeld
die tot een brute 1 miljard Watt en knalt dat de ionosfeer in, hiermee kunnen ze, en dat zeggen die lui van HAARP zelf;

When complete, the transmitter will be capable of producing up to 3.6 million Watts to an antenna system consisting of 180 crossed dipole antennas arranged as a rectangular, planar array. The intensity of the HF signal in the ionosphere is less than 3 microwatts per cm2, tens of thousands of times less than the Sun's natural electromagnetic radiation reaching the earth and hundreds of times less than even the normal random variations in intensity of the Sun's natural ultraviolet (UV) energy which creates the ionosphere.

Op donderdag 6 april 2006 18:55 schreef -Pepe- het volgende:

[..]

[..]

Waar stond dat van die miljard?

en laten we ons ook vast zorgen maken over dat nare zweden en noorwegen die ook al vergelijkbare dingen aan het bouwen zijn!
[afbeelding]

Geachte YuckFou

Ik kende het HAARP systeem nog niet maar wel soortgelijke systemen. HAARP is een meetsysteem om de ionosfeer en de gevolgen van (extra) zonneactiviteit op de telecommunicatie (via satellieten) te bestuderen. Hier is niets engs of zorgwekkends aan. Soortgelijke systemen om bijvoorbeeld de wind tot op grote hoogte te meten staan op heel veel plaatsen in de wereld. De HAARP website is nogal uitgebreid: ik heb dus niet alles kunnen lezen. Ik weet niet goed waar uw zorg vandaan komt. Het volgende is te lezen op de website:

Is HAARP capable of affecting the weather?

The HAARP facility will not affect the weather. Transmitted energy in the frequency ranges that will be used by HAARP is subject to negligible absorption in either the troposphere or the stratosphere - the two levels of the atmosphere that produce the earth's weather. Electromagnetic interactions only occur in the near-vacuum of the rarefied region above about 70 km known as the ionosphere.

The ionosphere is created and continuously replenished as the sun's radiation interacts with the highest levels of the Earth's atmosphere. The downward coupling from the ionosphere to the stratosphere/troposphere is extremely weak, and no association between natural ionospheric variability and surface weather and climate has been found, even at the extraordinarily high levels of ionospheric turbulence that the sun can produce during a geomagnetic storm. If the ionospheric storms caused by the sun itself don't affect the surface weather, there is no chance that HAARP can do so either.

Hier staat expliciet dat HAARP geen effect op het weer heeft. Het KNMI is geen voorstander van weermodificatie, en uit wetenschappelijk onderzoek blijkt dat het heel moeilijk (tot onmogelijk) is om het weer te beinvloeden (gelukkig!).

Met vriendelijke groet,

Op vrijdag 7 april 2006 14:21 schreef Resonancer het volgende:
I.m.o. 'n veelzeggende Quote

U.S. Defence Secretary Cohen:

Others [terrorists] are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves... So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations...It's real, and that's the reason why we have to intensify our [counterterrorism] efforts.

http://www.thememoryhole.org/mil/cohen-ecoweapons.htm

Op maandag 10 april 2006 22:29 schreef Boswachtertje het volgende:

[..]

Dit is inderdaad een veelzeggende quote met als bijbehorend gezegde: Pot verwijt de ketel

Dat zij (Amerika) hier mee bezig zijn, baart mij grote onrust. Waarom zo'n systeem ontwikkelen, als er geen echte vraag naar is? IMHO wordt de vraag hier gecre�rt. De documentaire die ik over H.A.A.R.P. heb gezien (van dr. Nick Begich) zeggen mij opzich genoeg: dit is de nieuwe oorlogstechnologie, de warfaremachine van de toekomst.

Wanneer leert de mensheid nou eens niet te fucken met zaken, waar we de werking niet eens van snappen? (of juist heel goed snappen, wat misschien wel het geval is bij de Amerikaanse onderzoekers en hoge politici en officieren

)

tvp en tegelijkertijd wil ik ook even benadrukken dat weermodificatie uiteindelijk alleen maar negatief zal zijn voor de mensheid. Ik bedoel, we hebben het eeuwen zonder gekund. Met is dus in mijn optiek 'dodelijk' voor de mensheid. Power we can't control, will never be controlled. Perhaps it can be neutralized.. but under no circumstance we'll be able to defeat mother nature..
denk ik dan maar

Geachte heer KNMI

Gezien uw onbekendheid met HAARP kan ik het u niet kwalijk nemen dat u de site hebt bekeken en op basis daarvan meent dat HAARP niet capabel is tot weersmodificatie.
Nu ben ik inmiddels een kleine 3 weken vrij veel met HAARP bezig geweest en mijn zorgen zijn alleen maar groter geworden.
Omdat ik u nu per normale mail in plaats van een mailform kan bereiken, ben ik zo vrij geweest onderstaande tekst aan u te mailen, het bevat informatie over haarp, links naar bronnen en wat foto's, 2 punten in uw reactie zijn fundamenteel fout, HAARP is gebouwd volgens een patent wat het volgende behelst: "Method and apparatus for altering a region in the earth's atmosphere, ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere"
dus niet primair een meetsysteem maar een systeem om de ionosfeer te veranderen, tweede punt is uw claim dat "uit wetenschappelijk onderzoek blijkt dat het heel moeilijk (tot onmogelijk) is om het weer te beinvloeden" naar mijn mening onjuist omdat hij eenvoudig weg niet strookt met de op 4,maart 2004 ingediende "U.S. Senate Bill 517 and U.S. House Bill 2995, a bill that would allow experimental weather modification by artificial methods and implement a national weather modification policy"

Als er officieel een "bill" ingediend word aangaande weersmodificatie, dan mag je toch stellen dat er meer aan de hand is dan het uitstrooien van enorme hoeveelheden kristallen zilverjodide (aldus de KNMI site over 'regen maken') nogmaals, ik maak me grote zorgen over dit ding.
Als u bij het KNMI niet op de hoogte bent van zulke installaties, die capabel zijn om delen van de ionosfeer wezenlijk te veranderen, hoe moet de normale burger dan ooit begrijpen dat er programma's uit gevoerd worden die het weer veranderen?

Nogmaals mijn verontschuldiging voor de groote van de mail, mocht dit niet uw veld zijn, wilt u deze mail dan forwarden aan de juiste persoon of mij daarvan op de hoogte stellen?

met vriendelijke groet en buitengewoon dank voor uw tijd,
YuckFou

HIGH-FREQUENCY ACTIVE AURORAL RESEARCH PROGRAM

"Method and apparatus for altering a region in the earth's atmosphere, ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere"

Op 11 Augustus 1987 word door Bernhard Eastlund patentaanvraag No. 4,686,605 ingediend waarin het volgende word omschreven:
quote:
US Patent and Trademardk Office. US Patent No. 4,686,605 Bernard Eastlund August 11, 1987

Method and apparatus for altering a region in the earth's atmosphere, ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere

Abstract:

This invention has a phenomenal variety of possible ramifications and potential future developments. As alluded to earlier, missile or aircraft destruction, deflection, or confusion could result, particularly when relativistic particles are employed. Also, large regions of the atmosphere could be lifted to an unexpectedly high altitude so that missiles encounter unexpected and unplanned drag forces with resultant destruction or deflection of same.

Weather modification is possible by, for example, altering upper atmosphere wind patterns or altering solar absorption patterns by constructing one or more plumes of atmospheric particles which will act as a lens or focusing device.

Also as alluded to earlier, molecular modifications of the atmosphere can take place so that positive environmental effects can be achieved. Besides actually changing the molecular composition of an atmospheric region, a particular molecule or molecules can be chosen for increased presence. For example, ozone, nitrogen, etc. concentrations in the atmosphere could be artificially increased. Similarly, environmental enhancement could be achieved by causing the breakup of various chemical entities such as carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitrous oxides, and the like.

etc.etc.
Heel erg vrij vertaald, door middel van een antenne array kan je een electromagnetische straal de ionosfeer instralen die op grote hoogte diezelfde ionosfeer kan veranderen waardoor je gebruik kan maken van die verandering.

Begin jaren '90 is daarom begonnen met de bouw van een antenna array in Alaska, en het projekt is inmiddels voltooid waarbij er nu 180 antenne's opgesteld staan:
quote:
The HAARP antenna array and transmitters were slated to be built in several distinct phases http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/phases.html

* Developmental Prototype (DP)
* (See http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/dp.html ) Filled DP (FDP),
* Limited IRI (LIRI)
* Full size or final IRI (FIRI).

See http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/fdp.html

During the Clinton administration, the "Filled Developmental Prototype" (FDP), namely a system composed of an array of 48 active antenna elements with connected wireless transmitters, was installed and completed at the HAARP facility in 1994. (See Figure 1 below) Under the initial Developmental Prototype (DP), only 18 of the 48 transmitters were connected.

Bernard Eastlund in a 1997 interview described this antenna array in its Filled DP stage as the "the largest ionospheric heater ever built".

This system of 48 antennas, however, while fully operational, was not according to Eastlund, powerful enough (in 1997) "to bring the ideas in his patents to fruition":

. "But they're getting up there", he said. "This is a very powerful device. Especially if they go to the expanded stage." (quoted in Scott Gilbert, op cit, see also http://www.emagazine.com/january-february_1997/0197currhaarp.html )

This 'final expanded stage' envisioned by Eastlund, which will provide maximum capability to manipulate the World's weather patterns, has now been reached.

Under the Bush administration, the main partner of Raytheon (which owns the patents) in the construction and development stage of the HAARP antenna array, is British Aerospace Systems (BAES), which had been involved in the initial installation of the antenna array in the early 1990s.

The multimillion dollar contract was granted by The Office of Naval Research to BAES in 2003, through its US subsidiary BAE Systems Advanced Technologies Inc. The contract was signed barely two months before the Anglo-American invasion of Iraq.

Using Raytheon's technology, BAES was to develop the HAARP Ionospheric Research Instrument (IRI) to its maximum capabilities of "Full size or final IRI (FIRI)".

In April 2003, BAE Systems Advanced Technologies outsourced the production and installation of the antennas to Phazar Corp (http://www.phazar.com/ ), a company specializing in advanced wireless antennas for military use. (Phazar owns Antenna Products Corporation of Mineral Wells, Texas http://www.antennaproducts.com/ ). Phazar was entrusted with producing and installing 132 crossed dipole antennas items for the HAARP facility. (http://www.antennaproducts.com/News%20Release%2004-18-03.pdf )

A year later, in April 2004, the final phase in the expansion of the HAARP facility was launched. (Dept of Defense, 19 April 2004). This phase consisted in equipping all the 180 antennas with high frequency transmitters. BAE Systems was awarded another lucrative contract, this time for $35 million.

In July 2004, Phazar had delivered and installed the 132 crossed dipole antennas including the antenna support structures and ground screen items at the HAARP facility, bringing the number of antennas from 48 under the FDP stage to 180. (see Table 2).

Meanwhile, BAE Systems had contracted with Jersey based defense electronics firm DRS Technologies, Inc in an $11.5 million outsourcing arrangement, the production and installation of the high-frequency (HF) radio transmitters for the HAARP antenna array. (See http://www.drs.com/press/archivelist.cfm?PRESS_RELEASE_ID=1529&preview=1 and Business Wire, 15 June 2004). DRS specializes in a variety of leading edge products for the U.S. military and intelligence agencies. ( http://www.drs.com/corporateinfo/index.cfm ).

Under its contract with BAE Systems Information and Electronic Warfare Systems in Washington, D.C., DRS is to manufacture and install "more than 60 Model D616G 10-Kilowatt Dual Transmitters" to be used with the HAARP system of antennas. (It is unclear from the company statements whether all the 180 antennas will be equipped with a transmitter, bringing the system up to full IRI capabilities).

Deliveries and installation are to be completed by July 2006. While HAARP is described as a "research project", the production of the transmitters was entrusted to DRS' C41 "Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence (C4I) Group"

Als je op video-google zoekt kom je uiteindelijk deze docu tegen, het geluid is helaas erg slecht, maar als je daar doorheen bijt kom je een hoop over HAARP te weten,de voorlichter van HAARP, Bernard Eastlund, en een hoop andere mensen die er mee te maken hebben of aan gewerkt hebben komen aan het woord.Onder andere word het volgende gemeld:

- de installatie is in staat 3,6 MegaWatt aan radiogolven te genereren, de antenne opstelling bundeld
die tot een 1 miljard Watt en knalt dat de ionosfeer in, hiermee kunnen ze, en dat zeggen die mensen van HAARP zelf;
- communiceren met onderzeers op elke plek op de aarde
- op elke plek in de bodem kijken en bepalen welke mineralen of grondstoofen er in de bodem zitten
- afwijkingen in de lager gelegen atmosferen creeren en dus objektief gezien, het weer veranderen.

Of ze echt capabel zijn een gewenste verandering aan te kunnen brengen in het weer is me niet duidelijk geworden, het kan misschien een kwestie van trial en error zijn, of misschien kunnen ze onderhand lokaal het weer heel bewust veranderen.

HAARP word gepresenteerd als een onderzoeksinstituut maar word in feite gerund door de US military:
quote:
HAARP has been operational since the early 1990s. Its system of antennas at Gakona, Alaska, was initially based on a technology patented by Advanced Power Technologies Inc. (APTI), a subsidiary of Atlantic Ritchfield Corporation (ARCO). The first phase of the HAARP Ionospheric Research Instrument (IRI) was completed by APTI. The IRI system of antennas was first installed in 1992 by a subsidiary of British Aerospace Systems (BAES) using the APTI patent. The antennas beam into the outer-atmosphere using a set of wireless high frequency transmitters.

In 1994, ARCO sold its APTI subsidiary, including the patents and the second phase construction contract to E-Systems, a secretive high tech military outfit with links to the CIA (http://www.crystalinks.com/haarp.html ).

E-Systems specializes in the production of electronic warfare equipment, navigation and reconnaissance machinery, including "highly sophisticated spying devices":

"[E-Systems] is one of the biggest intelligence contractors in the world, doing work for the CIA, defense intelligence organizations, and others. US$1.8 billion of their annual sales are to these organizations, with $800 million for black projects-projects so secret that even the United States Congress isn't told how the money is being spent.( http://www.earthpulse.com/haarp/vandalism.html )

"The company has outfitted such military projects as the Doomsday Plan (the system that allows the President to manage a nuclear war) and Operation Desert Storm." (Princeton Review, http://www.princetonrevie(...)asp?internshipID=998 )

With the purchase of APTI, E-Systems acquired the strategic weather warfare technology and patent rights, including Bernard J. Eastlund's US Patent No: 4,686,605 entitled "Method and Apparatus for Altering a Region in the Earth's Atmosphere, Ionosphere and/or Magnetosphere".

It is worth mentioning that the Eastlund /APTI patents were based on the research of Yugoslav scientist Nicola Tesla (many of whose ideas were stolen by US corporations). (See Scott Gilbert, Environmental Warfare and US Foreign Policy: The Ultimate Weapon of Mass Destruction, http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/GIL401A.html )

Eastlund described this deadly technology as capable of:

"causing�total disruption of communications over a very large portion of the Earth�missile or aircraft destruction, deflection or confusion� weather modification�" ( http://www.wealth4freedom.com/truth/12/HAARP.htm ),

Not surprisingly, the patent had previously been sealed under a government secrecy order.

Barely a year following the E-Systems purchase of APTI's weather warfare technology, E-Systems was bought out by Raytheon, the fourth largest US military contractor. Through this money-spinning acquisition, Raytheon became the largest "defense electronics" firm in the World.

Meanwhile, ARCO which had sold APTI to E-Systems, had itself been acquired by the BP-AMOCO oil consortium, thereby integrating the largest oil company in the World (BP).

Raytheon through its E-Systems subsidiary now owns the patents used to develop the HAARP weather warfare facility at Gakona Alaska. Raytheon is also involved in other areas of weather research for military use, including the activities of its subsidiary in Antarctica, Raytheon Polar Services.

Goed de installatie bestaat en zou volgens experts tot weersverandering in staat zijn, en zoals ik al eerder aanhaalde werd op 4 maart 2004 in de US senate de volgende "bill" aangekondigt:

Senate Floor Speech
Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison
March 4, 2004 -- Page: S2232

INTRODUCTION OF S. 2170, THE WEATHER MODIFICATION
RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AUTHORIZATION ACT
MRS. HUTCHISON. Mr. President, I rise to introduce legislation to recognize the importance and need for increased weather modification research. Weather modification is the general term that refers to any human attempt to alter the weather. While we may not be able to stop Mother Nature entirely, we can sometimes alter her course, changing the weather in small, yet significant ways. These efforts have been used in the U.S. for more than 50 years to reduce crop and property damage, optimize useable precipitation during growing seasons and lessen the impact of periodic, often severe droughts.

The weather modification projects in Texas and other States in the U.S. are much more than well considered responses to drought. They are trying to use the latest technological developments in the science to chemically squeeze more precipitation out of clouds. Moisture that is needed to replenish fresh-water supplies in aquifers and reservoirs. Political subdivisions like water conservation districts and county commissions have embraced the technology of rain enhancement as one element of a long-term, water-management strategy. This is critical to ensure growing populations have enough water to meet future needs.

This bill will develop a comprehensive and coordinated national weather modification policy through federal and state research and development programs. It will also establish a Weather Modification Advisory and Research Board within the Department of Commerce to promote and expand the practical knowledge of weather modification. Further, it recognizes the significance of state and federal collaboration in this endeavor.

I am proud to offer this legislation to bring attention to this important research and I would urge my colleagues to support the Weather Modification Research and Technology Transfer Authorization Act.

(bron: http://www.senate.gov/~hutchison/speec379.htm hier de betreffende wet:http://www.theorator.com/bills109/s517.html )

De Verenigde Staten willen dus serieus met weersmodificatie aan de slag, en dat baart me grote zorgen, en daarnaast zijn er veel signalen die erop wijzen dat HAARP militair ge-exploiteerd kan worden wat me nog veel grotere zorgen baart! Maar ik ben niet de engiste, ook de Eurpese Commissie heeft in 1999 z'n zorg al over HAARP uitgesproken:

VERSLAG

145k 111k

14 januari 1999

PE 227.710/def. A4-0005/99

over milieu, veiligheid en buitenlands beleid
Rapporteur voor advies: Karl Erik Olsson, Commissie milieubeheer, volksgezondheid en consumentenbescherming
(Hughes-procedure)

Commissie buitenlandse zaken, veiligheids- en defensiebeleid
Rapporteur: Maj Britt Theorin

"

HAARP - een wapensysteem dat het klimaat ontregelt

Op 5 februari 1998 organiseerde de Subcommissie veiligheid en ontwapening van het Europees Parlement een hoorzitting over o.a. HAARP. Vertegenwoordigers van de NAVO en de VS waren uitgenodigd, maar zij verkozen niet deel te nemen. De Commissie betreurt dat de VS niemand stuurde om vragen te beantwoorden en geen gebruik maakte van de mogelijkheid het gepresenteerde materiaal van een toelichting te voorzien(22).

HAARP; programma voor het onderzoek van hoogfrequente straling (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project) wordt gezamenlijk uitgevoerd door de Amerikaanse luchtmacht en marine, in samenwerking met het Geophysical Institute of the University of Alaska, Fairbanks. Soortgelijke proeven worden eveneens uitgevoerd door Noorwegen, waarschijnlijk op de Zuidpool, maar ook in de voormalige Sovjetunie(23). HAARP is een onderzoeksproject in het kader waarvan met uitrusting op de grond, een net van antennes die ieder hun energie ontvangen van een eigen zender, delen van ionosfeer worden opgewarmd(24) met krachtige radiogolven. De gegenereerde energie warmt bepaalde delen van de ionosfeer op met het gevolg dat er in de ionosfeer eveneens gaten vallen en kunstmatige lenzen ontstaan.

HAARP kan voor vele doelen worden ingezet. Door de elektrische eigenschappen in de atmosfeer te manipuleren kunnen enorme krachten worden gestuurd. Indien dit wordt gebruikt als wapen kunnen de gevolgen voor de vijand verwoestend zijn. Door middel van HAARP kan miljoenen malen meer energie naar een exacte plaats worden gedirigeerd dan met iedere andere traditionele zender. De energie kan eveneens worden gericht tegen een bewegend doel, hetgeen nuttig kan zijn bij de bestrijding van vijandelijke raketten.

Het project maakt het eveneens mogelijk beter met onderzee�rs te communiceren en de weersomstandigheden op de wereld te manipuleren. Ook het tegenovergestelde is echter mogelijk, namelijk het storen van de communicatie. Door de ionosfeer te be�nvloeden kan de mondiale communicatie worden gestoord, terwijl tegelijkertijd de mededeling van de gebruiker doorkomt. Een andere toepassing van het systeem is het maken van r�ntgenfoto's van de aarde tot op enkele kilometers diepte (via aarddoordringende tomografie) om aardolie- en gasvelden te lokaliseren, maar eveneens onderaardse militaire uitrusting. Radar die over de horizon heen kan kijken en objecten op lange afstand kan defini�ren, is een verdere toepassing van het HAARP-systeem. Op deze manier kunnen naderende objecten worden opgezocht achter de kromming van het aardoppervlak.

Sinds het begin van de jaren '50 heeft de VS in de Van Allen-gordels kernmateriaal tot ontploffing gebracht om te onderzoeken welke gevolgen kernontploffingen op zo grote hoogte wegens de elektromagnetische pulsen die tijdens de explosie ontstaan, hadden voor de doorgifte van radiosignalen en voor de werking van radar. Zo ontstonden nieuwe magnetische stralingsgordels die vrijwel de hele aarde omvatten. De elektronen bewogen zich langs magnetische-veldlijnen en veroorzaakten boven de Noordpool een kunstmatig noorderlicht. Het gevaar bestaat dat de Van Allen-gordel ten gevolge van deze militaire tests langdurig ernstig ontregeld wordt. Het magnetisch veld van de aard kan over grote gebieden worden gestoord waardoor radiocommunicatie onmogelijk wordt. Volgens Amerikaanse wetenschappers kan het honderden jaren duren voordat de Van Allengordel weer gestabiliseerd is. HAARP kan veranderingen in weerpatronen met zich meebrengen. Het kan eveneens van invloed zijn op het hele ecosysteem, met name in de gevoelige Zuidpool-regio.

Een bijkomend ernstig gevolg van HAARP zijn de gaten in de ionosfeer die worden veroorzaakt door de krachtige radiostralen die worden uitgezonden. De ionosfeer beschermt ons tegen kosmische straling van buiten. Gehoopt wordt dat de gaten zich weer vullen, maar de ervaringen met veranderingen van de ozonlaag wijzen in tegengestelde richting. Dit betekent dat de beschermende ionosfeer grote gaten vertoont.

Door de enorme gevolgen voor het milieu is HAARP een mondiaal probleem en het is te betwijfelen of de voordelen van deze systemen werkelijk opwegen tegen de gevaren. De ecologische en ethische gevolgen moeten diepgaand worden onderzocht voordat verder onderzoek en proeven worden uitgevoerd. HAARP is bij de publieke opinie vrijwel geheel onbekend en het is van belang dat het algemene besef inzake dit project wordt verruimd.

HAARP is gekoppeld aan vijftig jaar intensief ruimte-onderzoek van duidelijk militaire aard, o.a. in het kader van "Star Wars", met de bedoeling de bovenste lagen van de atmosfeer en de communicaties te beheersen. Dit soort onderzoek moet als een ernstige verstoring van het milieu worden beschouwd, die eventueel onvermoede gevolgen voor het menselijk leven kan hebben. Niemand weet momenteel zeker welke gevolgen HAARP met zich mee kan brengen. De cultuur van geheimzinnigheid in verband met militair onderzoek moet worden bestreden. Het recht op openbaarheid en democratische controle van militaire onderzoeksprojecten en van parlementair onderzoek moet worden bevorderd.

Tegen het licht van een reeks internationale wetten (Verdrag inzake het verbod van militair of ieder ander vijandelijk gebruik van technieken om het milieu te veranderen, het Zuidpool-verdrag, het Verdrag houdende beginselen voor het gedrag van de landen bij het onderzoek van de ruimte, met inbegrip van de maan en andere hemellichamen, en het VN-verdrag inzake zeewetgeving) komt HAARP naar voren als zeer twijfelachtig, niet alleen vanuit menselijk en politiek standpunt, maar ook vanuit juridische optiek. Volgens het Zuidpool-verdrag mag de Zuidpool uitsluitend worden gebruikt voor vreedzame doelen(25). Dit betekent dat HAARP een overtreding van het volkerenrecht is. Alle gevolgen van de nieuwe wapensystemen moeten door onafhankelijke internationale instanties worden onderzocht. Er moeten aanvullende internationale overeenkomsten worden opgesteld om het milieu tijdens oorlogen te beschermen tegen onnodige aantasting."

(bron: http://www.europarl.eu.int/omk/sipade3?L=NL&OBJID=1049&LEVEL=3&MODE=SIP&NAV=X&LSTDOC=N )

in 2003 is door Hiltrud Breyer nog navraag gedaan naar bovenstaand onderzoek maar daar is nimmer meer antwoord op gekomen voor zover ik heb kunnen nagaan (bron http://www.europarl.eu.int/omk/sipade3?PUBREF=-//EP//TEXT+WQ+E-2003-1453+0+DOC+XML+V0//NL&L=NL&LEVEL=2&NAV=S&LSTDOC=Y )

Maar ook volgens een Raport van de Russische Duma is HAARP een gevaarlijke installatie:
The use of the new geophysical weapon might lead to the global catastrophe

A lot of specialists and scientists believe that unpredictable natural disasters and several man-caused catastrophes that struck Europe and Asia in the summer of the year 2002 say that there might be certain global reasons that caused them all. First and foremost, it goes about a possibility of secret geophysical weapon tests. Those tests were either secret or unauthorized. The Russian Federation State Duma spent almost a year, considering the global threat of the HAARP program. The Duma finally prepared two addresses: to President Putin and to the UN, international organizations, parliaments and governments of all countries, to the scientific community of the world, as well as to mass media. The Russian parliament suggested the global banning of HAARP tests. In September of the year 2002 the State Duma of Russia discussed this question and conducted the voting in order to send the mentioned addresses to the adequate addressees. One hundred and eighty-eight deputies voted for the address to President Vladimir Putin, whereas the same subject for the UN returned 220 votes. This proved that Russian parliamentarians were rather concerned about the development and possible use of geophysical weapons.

It is well known that the USA and the USSR concluded an agreement at the end of the 1970s. Pursuant to the agreement, scientific developments in the field of geophysics for military purposes were banned. All the works in the field became secret too. However, the works continued anyway, despite the signed document. It was simply conducted under the disguise of the scientific research or the development of the double-purpose technology. The point and the purpose of those developments were rather vague and even mysterious.

A lot of specialists and scientists believe that a special American program HAARP is one of those developments. American scientist Bernard Eastlund is considered to be the godfather of this program. He received the patent for the method and for the device to measure the layers of the Earth atmosphere, the ionosphere and/or the magnetosphere. It is an open secret that the USA (probably, not the USA alone) has already constructed high-frequency transmitter facilities. Those devices can heat the earth environment up to the state of plasma by means of pumping ions. This makes it possible to control the environment, which might show considerable influence on the atmospheric phenomena. The owners of this weapon are able to program floods, twisters and storms, even earthquakes in any region of the planet. It is also possible to paralyze civil and military electric surveillance systems, and even to affect the mentality of whole nations.

There is a suspicion that the unusual natural disasters and man-caused catastrophes of the year 2002, the unexplainable indifference of several nations on the post-Soviet territory might be linked to USA’s tests of geophysical weapons of low capacities. However, neither American politicians and scientists, nor the world community know, if it is going to be possible to stop the work of the geophysical weapon, if it is used at its full capacity. This is the major problem. It is quite possible that the first full capacity use of the geophysical weapon might end up in a global catastrophe. Does it seem to be science fiction? Not really, as a matter of fact. High frequency transmitter facilities already exist. They are located in Norway and at an army base in Alaska. The short description of the program and some photographs can be found on the official site Haarp.alaska.edu. Another high power transmitter facility, a more powerful one, is going to be put into operation in Greenland soon. When this happens, the geophysical weapon will be capable of covering Eurasia from the Atlantic to the Pacific coast.

The information on this subject appeared on several Ukrainian websites on September of 2002. In this connection, I think that the Ukrainian parliament must support the initiative of the Russian State Duma as well. The Ukrainian Academy of Sciences ought to consider the issue of HAARP’s potential threat to Ukraine. Adequate institutions ought to collect all the information available and identify Ukraine’s stand on the subject.

Yuru Solomatin
Ukrainian deputy, the secretary of the Ukrainian committee for the economic policy, nature management and for the liquidation of Chernobyl tragedy consequences. (bron: http://english.pravda.ru/science/19/94/378/5570_haarp.html )

2 wat links georienteerde internetsites hebben de volgende artikelen over HAARP gepubliceert:

"Weather modification bill may affect agriculture"

" This experimental weather modification bill will impact residents across the United States not just in California. Many current and ongoing weather modification programs (47 listed by NOAA in 2005), including the one in Wyoming that is designed to increase the snowpack, may be diverting rainwater away from Oklahoma and Texas, two states that are currently fighting fires caused by a lack of rainfall. We have no idea what the unintended consequences of the Wyoming action or other experimental weather modification programs might be now or in the future.

In addition to the experimental weather modification programs listed by NOAA, there are both private and ongoing government sponsored atmospheric testing and heating programs underway in Alaska and across the United States. Alaska Senator Stevens recently received $50 million in funding for Alaska's atmospheric heating program. "

http://www.foodconsumer.o(...)ronment_health.shtml

" IT'S NOT ONLY GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS:
WASHINGTON'S NEW WORLD ORDER WEAPONS HAVE THE ABILITY TO TRIGGER CLIMATE CHANGE "

by Michel Chossudovsky
Professor of Economics, University of Ottawa,

"The important debate on global warming under UN auspices provides but a partial picture of climate change; in addition to the devastating impacts of greenhouse gas emissions on the ozone layer, the World's climate can now be modified as part of a new generation of sophisticated "non-lethal weapons." Both the Americans and the Russians have developed capabilities to manipulate the World's climate.

In the US, the technology is being perfected under the High-frequency Active Aural Research Program (HAARP) as part of the ("Star Wars") Strategic Defence Initiative (SDI). Recent scientific evidence suggests that HAARP is fully operational and has the ability of potentially triggering floods, droughts, hurricanes and earthquakes. From a military standpoint, HAARP is a weapon of mass destruction. Potentially, it constitutes an instrument of conquest capable of selectively destabilising agricultural and ecological systems of entire regions.

While there is no evidence that this deadly technology has been used, surely the United Nations should be addressing the issue of "environmental warfare" alongside the debate on the climatic impacts of greenhouse gases"

http://www.earthpulse.com/src/subcategory.asp?catid=1&subcatid=7

Begrijpt u nu mijn zorgen?

Met vriendelijke groet,
YuckFou

bronnen:
http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/index.html
http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/photos.html
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO409F.html
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO201A.html
http://crashrecovery.org/haarp/
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=HAARP
http://www.google.nl/search?q=HAARP&btnG=Google+zoeken&meta=

p.s. nog een mooi collage van een door HAARP opgewekte 'aurora'

Op maandag 10 april 2006 22:44 schreef Resonancer het volgende:
Zo stellig ben ik niet, Haarp en EM straling kan ook voor hele mooie dingen gebruikt worden.
Tom Bearden en Nick Begich vertellen dit ook (niet in die video). Zij benadrukken beidden dat het grote gevaar de geheimhouding/mililtairisering van deze projecten is. Je kunt ontelbaar vel scenarios verzinnen om misbruik van deze techniek te maken; landbouw kapot maken, prijsbeinvloedingen (kou en olie), verzekeringen, herbouw na natuurrampen (halliburton in new orleans), met n btje zieke geest (gna.gna.) valt er genoeg te verzinnen. Dat is ook precies wat de EU eist; openheid, onafhankelijke onderzoekers toelaten of kappen.

Geachte YuckFou

Ik heb inderdaad niet de patenten van HAARP nagezocht en dat ben ik ook niet van plan. Uw reactie op mijn antwoorden kan ik niet onbeantwoord laten. Ik vind dat u nogal stellig bent in het terzijde schuiven van mijn antwoorden. Op basis van de website van HAARP kwam ik tot de conclusie dat HAARP een meetinstrument is. In hun Q&A pagina laten ze ook duidelijk blijken niet het weer te kunnen veranderen (zie citaat van gisteren). Dat er (in het geheim) andere (militaire) intenties zijn, zou best kunnen maar wat moeten we daar als KNMI mee? U baseert uw conclusies op (aangevraagde) patenten en dat is wat anders dan op wetenschappelijke publicaties. Patenten kunnen ook geregistreerd worden op ideeen die (nog) niet zijn bewezen. Weermodificatie is wetenschappelijk gezien nog steeds heel discutabel (zie bijv. attachment) maar er zijn heel veel patenten op dit gebied (en maar heel weinig aantoonbare resultaten).

Met vriendelijke groet,

Ir. KNMI

Geachte Ir. KNMI

Wederom in eerste plaats dank mijnerzijds dat u de moeite heeft willen nemen te antwoorden, het stellig terzijde schuiven van uw antwoorden was ten dele bedoeld u te prikkelen de meegezonden teksten door te lezen, enigzins hopend op een verandering van uw mening.
Nu u duidelijk heeft gemaakt geen behoefte aan verdere studie hieraan te wijden, zal ik u niet meer van uw kostbare tijd beroven met vervolgmails betreffende dit onderwerp.
Waarom ik ht KNMI met deze vraag heb belast lijkt me duidelijk, de VS zijn wel degelijk bezig met weersmodificatie en dat in een tijd waarin vrijwel ieder land zich druk maakt om klimaatverandering, mocht de VS met HAARP het weer wel degelijk kunnen sturen dan lijkt me dat voor het KNMI van wezenlijk belang, wat is de waarde van een weermodel als het model door humaan ingrijpen verandert kan worden?
Het spijt me, ik kan het niet laten een klein stukje van een militair onderzoek uit de VS te quoten:
"Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025
In 2025, US aerospace forces can “own the weather,” as they “own the night”
now. Though a high-risk effort, the investment to do so would pay high rewards.
Weather modification offers both the commercial sector and the military greatly
enhanced capabilities. For this to occur, technology advancements in five major areas are
necessary. These are advanced nonlinear modeling techniques, computational capability,
information gathering and transmission, a global sensor array, and weather intervention
techniques. All of these will be greatly enhanced as we approach 2025 " bron

En als ik own lees dan is dat over 20 jaar dus een stuk verder dan trial en error, waar ze naar mijn mening, en van vele anderen zie bronnen, al druk mee bezig zijn.
Ik zal u hier verder niet over lastig vallen, een kleine vraag nog van mijn kant, kunt u me vertellen waar zich in Nederland de leerstoelen meteorologie bevinden, ik zou graag contact met hen opnemen om hun bevindingen betreffende HAARP te vragen.
Nogmaals mijn excuses voor het vragen van uw tijd,
met vriendelijke groet en hoogachting,
YuckFou

Op dinsdag 11 april 2006 12:52 schreef YuckFou het volgende:
Ik heb weer antwoord van het KNMI!!
Maar 't is wederom weer een beetje teleurstellend:

Het attachment betrof een studie naar hagel waarin werd gekeken hoe hagel zich vormde en wat er eventueel tegen te doen was met zilverjodide om hagelschade bij boeren te beperken.
Daarom heb ik hem nog maar een mailtje teruggestuurd, hopend op een final shot, maar ik heb het KNMI een beetje opgegeven zoals ook uit m'n laatste vraag aan hem blijkt:

En nu maar weer gedukdig afwachten

Op dinsdag 11 april 2006 13:02 schreef Boswachtertje het volgende:

[..]

Die man heeft de schrik van zijn leven gekregen. Een militair weerwapen??

zal ie gedacht hebben...

The HAARP Program is a US Air Force, Navy and University of Alaska funded investigation to "understand, simulate and control ionospheric processes that might alter the performance of communication and surveillance systems" as well as weather systems and those which actually can modify human behavior.
_bron

A scientist working at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, who insisted on anonymity, told Columbus Alive that two different secret projects have been conducted. One involved cloud creation experiments to lessen the effect of global warming. The other involved radiation reflection off clouds in conjunction with the military's High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) in Alaska.

The scientist claims that the two most common substances being sprayed into chemtrails are aluminum oxide and barium stearate. When you see planes flying back and forth marking parallel lines, X-patterns and grids in a clear sky, that's aluminum oxide, according to the scientist. The goal is to create an artificial sunscreen to reflect solar radiation back into space to alleviate global warming.

In some cases, barium may be sprayed in a similar manner for the purpose of "high-tech 3-D radar imaging. The barium can be used for a 'wire' to shoot an electromagnetic beam through to take 3-D images of the ground far over the horizon," according to the scientist.

Thomas, writing in the November-December 2001 issue of NEXUS New Times magazine, essentially confirmed this assessment of the activities at the Dayton air base. "The barium spread in exercises conducted out of Wright-Patterson Air Force Base acts as an electrolyte, enhancing conductivity of radar and radio waves," Thomas reported. "Wright-Pat has also long been deeply engaged in HAARP's electromagnetic warfare program."
_bron

The UN has banned it. It’s reported to be in the arsenal of several nations, including the U.S. It’s reported to be OPERATIONAL. What are we going to do about this weapon system? And did it play a role in creating Hurricane Katrina or in steering her along her murderous path?
[...]
But a few are now daring to ask : did elements within the U.S. or other governments have a role in creating, "enhancing," or steering Katrina toward her Gulf Coast target, using advanced military technology? If so, was Katrina at least in part an act of mass murder and treason, perhaps by rogue elements within the Pentagon or its private contractors--or was it, possibly, a stealthy act of war against the U.S.?
[...]
As you read, think about last winter’s tsunami, which destabilized a highly strategic region for hydrocarbon production and, especially, hydrocarbon shipping. Think about the 2001 FEMA report that identified the THREE "likeliest, most catastrophic disasters facing this country" : a terror attack on New York, a major hurricane’s direct hit on New Orleans, and a major earthquake in Northern California. Is it two down, one to go?
_bron

The HAARP system intends to beam 3.6 Gigawatts of effective radiated power of high frequency radio energy into the ionosphere in order to:
- Generate extremely low frequency (ELF) waves for communicating with submerged submarines
- Conduct geophysical probes to identify and characterize natural ionospheric processes so that techniques can be developed to mitigate or control them
- Generate ionospheric lenses to focus large amounts of high frequency energy, thus providing a means of triggering ionospheric processes that potentially could be exploited for Department of Defense purposes
- Electron acceleration for infrared (IR) and other optical emissions which could be used to control radio wave propagation properties
- Generate geomagnetic field aligned ionization to control the reflection/scattering properties of radio waves
- Use oblique heating to produce effects on radio wave propagation, thus broadening the potential military applications of ionospheric enhancement technology.
_bron

All-weather worries

"It is time to provide funds for application of the scientific method to weather modification and control," said Bernard Eastlund, chief technical officer and founder of Eastlund Scientific Enterprises Corporation in San Diego, California.

Eastlund’s background is in plasma physics and commercial applications of microwave plasmas. At a lecture early this month at Penn State Lehigh Campus in Fogelsville, Pennsylvania, he outlined new concepts for electromagnetic wave interactions with the atmosphere that, among a range of jobs, could be applied to weather modification research.
[...]
Carefully tailored program plan

Eastlund said that the reduction in severity or impact of severe weather could be demonstrated as part of a carefully tailored program plan.

"In my opinion, the new technology for use of artificial plasma layers in the atmosphere: as heater elements to modify steering winds, as a modifier of electrostatic potential to influence lightning distribution, and for generation of acoustic and gravitational waves, could ultimately provide a core technology for a science of severe weather modification," Eastlund told SPACE.com.

The first experiments of a program, Eastlund emphasized, would be very small, and designed for safety. For example, a sample of air in a jet stream could be heated with a pilot experimental installation. Such experiments would utilize relatively small amounts of power, between one and ten megawatts, he pointed out.

Both ground-based and space weather diagnostic instruments could measure the effect. Computer simulations could compare these results with predicted effects. This process can be iterated until reliable information is obtained on the effects of modifying the wind.

Computer simulations of hurricanes, Eastlund continued, are designed to determine the most important wind fields in hurricane formation. Computer simulations of mesocyclones use steering wind input data to predict severe storm development.

After about 5 years of such research, and further development of weather codes, a pilot experiment to modify the steering winds of a mesocylone might be safely attempted. Such an experiment would probably require 50 to 100 megawatts, Eastlund speculated.

"I estimate this new science of weather modification will take 10 to 20 years to mature to the point where it is useful for controlling the severity and impact of severe weather systems as large as hurricanes," Eastlund explained.

Inadvertent effects?

Another reason for embarking on this new science could be to make sure inadvertent effects of existing projects, such as the heating of the ionosphere and modifications of the polar electrojet, are not having effects on weather, Eastlund stated.

As example, Eastlund pointed to the High frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP). This is a major Arctic facility for upper atmospheric and solar-terrestrial research, being built on a Department of Defense-owned site near Gakona, Alaska.

Eastlund wonders if HAARP does, in fact, generate gravity waves. If so, can those waves in turn influence severe weather systems?

Started in 1990, the unclassified HAARP program is jointly managed by the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory and the Office of Naval Research. Researchers at the site make use of a high-power ionospheric research instrument to temporarily excite a limited area of the ionosphere for scientific study, observing and measuring the excited region using a suite of devices.

The fundamental goal of research conducted at the facility is to study and understand natural phenomena occurring in the Earth’s ionosphere and near-space environment. According to the HAARP website, those scientific investigations will have major value in the design of future communication and navigation systems for both military and civilian use.
_bron

The HAARP Program is a US Air Force, Navy and University of Alaska funded investigation to "understand, simulate and control ionospheric processes that might alter the performance of communication and surveillance systems" as well as weather systems and those which actually can modify human behavior.

Op woensdag 12 april 2006 15:04 schreef Boswachtertje het volgende:
Yuckfou schreef:
[..]

Aha.. daar gaat het dus om! Of niet alleen, maar in ieder geval eng dat dit in de quote staat.. Actually modify human behavior.. tijd om eens echt diep in de materie te duiken dus!

Op woensdag 12 april 2006 15:15 schreef YuckFou het volgende:

[..]
dit mag gewoon niet, punt.

Op woensdag 12 april 2006 15:15 schreef YuckFou het volgende:
Tja de chemtrail/behavior kant van het verhaal laat ik eigenlijk een beetje links liggen, bewust, dat is voor veel mensen veels te sci-fi en helpt de discussie niet echt.
Mijn punt is dat de US met het weer en het electromagnetisch stralings veld van de aarde aan het prutsen zijn,
wtf denken ze wel niet....dat ze God zijn?
Er is voor mij gewoon een grens aan wat je moet toelaten, en een hoop verhalen hier in tru en elders zijn moeilijk te bewijzen, HAARP niet, hun intenties met het weer ook niet, dan voel ik me geroepen om herrie te gaan maken,
dit mag gewoon niet, punt.

Op woensdag 12 april 2006 15:46 schreef Boswachtertje het volgende:

[..]
Ze zijn er dus al mee bezig, als ik deze woorden letterlijk opvat.. Part of a larger plan one might think...

Op woensdag 12 april 2006 17:04 schreef Resonancer het volgende:
google s op MKultra, mocht je dit nog niet kennen, niet schrikken he.

"The Deputy Director of the CIA revealed that over 30 universities and institutions were involved in an 'extensive testing and experimentation' program which included covert drug tests on unwitting citizens 'at all social levels, high and low, native Americans and foreign.' Several of these tests involved the administration of LSD to 'unwitting subjects in social situations.' At least one death, that of Dr. Olson, resulted from these activities. The Agency itself acknowledged that these tests made little scientific sense. The agents doing the monitoring were not qualified scientific observers."

Op donderdag 13 april 2006 15:10 schreef Resonancer het volgende:
Het is niet alleen Haarp.
GWEN, ELF, GSM, UMTS.

Op donderdag 13 april 2006 22:25 schreef YuckFou het volgende:

[..]

Ik vind dat zelf te wazig worden, dat is voor mij hetzelfde als met conspiracy's intressant om mee te nemen maar niet echt feitelijk onderbouwd, HAARP is zo onwijs tastbaar, de roep om wettelijke omkadering ten behoeve van weersmodificatie ligt open op tafel, er is niks wazigs aan, en het is zo voor mij al erg genoeg...
evengoed keep on posting those links!

Op vrijdag 26 mei 2006 20:33 schreef DangermousE het volgende:
Geef mij maar een speer, stuk of 6 chicks en een warme knusse grot .

Op vrijdag 26 mei 2006 20:35 schreef YuckFou het volgende:

[..]

Kon je niks zinnigers voor zo'n kick omhoog verzinnen?

Ik ben al een tijdje niet meer met HAARP bezig geweest omdat er zo fuckin' veel verder in de wereld gebeurt, maar ik ben eigenlijk nog steeds op zoek naar de vakgroepen meteorologie om met onderzoekers of studenten van daar over HAARP te mailen.

Op vrijdag 26 mei 2006 20:38 schreef DangermousE het volgende:
de onnodige olieafhankelijkheid van de HELE wereld.

Op vrijdag 26 mei 2006 20:43 schreef YuckFou het volgende:

[..]

google video-Nicola Tesla

Alleen jammer dat die 3 truckladingen aantekeningen en notities door de US goverment is geconfisceerd na z'n overlijden

Nou 3 keer raden wie het eerste idee voor een HAARP achtige installatie had...

Op vrijdag 26 mei 2006 20:48 schreef DangermousE het volgende:

[..]

http://seaspower.com/StrategicOverview.htm
!!!!
In Nederland zijn vast veel betastudentjes met een zwak voor antigravity-meuk te vinden, misschien een idee om een beetje te netwerken ?

Op dinsdag 4 april 2006 20:04 schreef Bijsmaak het volgende:
Hmmmm, klinkt nog ambitieuzer dan die Star-Wars program. Volgens is het technologisch en financieel nog niet haalbaar.

Op dinsdag 11 april 2006 14:00 schreef YuckFou het volgende:

[..]

Ik heb geen idee wat ik van deze man moet denken, het komt op mij een heel klein beetje als 'je verspilt mn tijd, op hun site staat toch...' over en wil ie er niet echt aan om er in te duiken.

Op zaterdag 30 september 2006 21:48 schreef Wombcat het volgende:
Ik kan me daar wel iets bij voorstellen eigenlijk. Hij zit er tenslotte op zijn werk, en in zijn functiebeschrijving staat vast niet dat 'ie dit soort dingen moet bestuderen.

Op zaterdag 30 september 2006 23:53 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:
Dit blijft ook vaak de kop opsteken zeg

Op zondag 1 oktober 2006 00:44 schreef YuckFou het volgende:

[..]

Zit zeker wat in, maar je zou toch zeggen dat als je geintresseerd bent in het weer, en je zoiets onder ogen krijgt je er wat moeite voor zou doen?
[..]

Op zondag 1 oktober 2006 00:44 schreef YuckFou het volgende:

...

't is imo dan ook wel fuckin' belangrijk, we krijgen bijna dagelijks te horen dat het klimaat aan het veranderen is, als ze dan met een sort of megamagnetron de ionosfeer aan het verwarmen zijn ga je mij niet wijsmaken dat dat niks aan die klimaatsveranderingen toebrengt...

Op zaterdag 30 september 2006 18:28 schreef YuckFou het volgende:

Ik blijf herhalen, ze lopen te fucken met de ionosfeer zonder dat ze weten wat ze doen, en nog veel erger, zonder het ons te vertellen, iemand nog een meteoroloog in z'n kennissenkring die ik kan mailen hierover?

Op zondag 1 oktober 2006 02:08 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:
Das nog minder dan een schijntje in verhouding met wat de zon erin pompt

Op zondag 1 oktober 2006 02:18 schreef HenkieVdV het volgende:
Correctie: jij denkt dat ze niets weten.

Laten we dan ook maar meteen stoppen met een kernfusieprogramma en natuurlijk ook meteen stoppen met deeltjesversnellers testen etc.

Als de mensheid verder wil komen dan dit geouwehoer moeten ze dingen onderzoeken en testen.

Op zondag 1 oktober 2006 02:22 schreef zhe-devilll het volgende:
ze spelen met het weer...ach laat ze,
vind het wel lekker dit weer!

Op zondag 1 oktober 2006 02:27 schreef YuckFou het volgende:

beetje crappy argument, kernfusie en deeltjesversnellers zijn man-made things die 'binnenshuis' worden uitgevoerd, ik zou een stuk minder happig op deeltjes onderzoek zijn als ze dat bijv. in open air zouden doen en daadwerkelijk fysieke veranderingen in de atmosfeer of voor mijn part de oceaan zouden doen

Op zondag 1 oktober 2006 02:35 schreef HenkieVdV het volgende:
Kernfusie een man-made thing..

In ieder geval, ik denk dat ze net zo goed weten waarmee ze bezig zijn als men bezig is met het opwekken van kernfusie. De deeltjesversneller onder Frankrijk nu bijvoorbeeld, weten ze amper van wat daar de gevolgen van zullen zijn. Het is allemaal testen, kijken etc.

Ik zie dit gewoon als intressant project. Waarm zoudenen ze het mondiale klimaat willen veranderen? Het is gewoon een "nieuwe" technologie die getest moet worden, zodat ze leren wat ze er uiteindelijk mee kunnen doen. En als ik dan hier lees dat ze mensen willen gaan beinvloeden e.d moet ik wel een beetje lachen.

Op zondag 1 oktober 2006 02:42 schreef YuckFou het volgende:

[..]

fucken met mother nature vind ik erg genoeg...

Op zondag 1 oktober 2006 02:46 schreef Oksel het volgende:
Kan iemand in 1 zin samenvatten wat die installatie in Canada doet?

Op zondag 1 oktober 2006 02:27 schreef YuckFou het volgende:

Voor zover ik weet is de ionosfeer een electromagnetische laag waarop zonnestraling voor een groot gedeelte op word afgeketst, tuurlijk is dat vermogen vele malen groter dan wat ze er nu van onderaf op stralen, maar als je de OP en zeker de links die her en der in het topic zijn geplaatst een beetje doorleest dan kan je eruit opmaken dat met het veranderen van de ionosfeer ook lager gelegen gebieden beinvloed worden wat daardoor weer het mondiale weer veranderd...

Op zondag 1 oktober 2006 02:46 schreef Oksel het volgende:
Kan iemand in 1 zin samenvatten wat die installatie in ~~Canada~~ Alaska doet?

Op zondag 1 oktober 2006 06:21 schreef pietje77 het volgende:
www.infowars.com en www.prisonplanet.com zijn groter dan de FOX new anchors en de meeste grote kranten!

Op zondag 1 oktober 2006 20:27 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:
Niet echt. De laag wordt geioniseert door de straling van de zon. Daardoor ontstaat de inosfeer. Enkele lagen hiervan verdwijnen bijv ook volledig in de nacht wat bij radiocommunicatie via een aantal frequentiebanden onmogelijk maakt.

Op maandag 2 oktober 2006 10:36 schreef Lambiekje het volgende:
Is er al een 2e reactie van KNMI gekomen over die tientallen achtergrond info.?

Russia has long build it own facility similar to HAARP. The facility Sura is not as powerful as HAARP. It is located in Russia's central area, in a remote and desolate place some 150 km from the city of Nizhny Novgorod. One of the leading scientific research institutions of the USSR, Research Institute of Radiophysical Studies, owns the facility.

The Sura Ionospheric Heating Facility, located near the small town Vasilsursk about 100 km eastward from Nizhniy Novgorod (geographical position 56.13� N / 46.10� E) in Russia, is a laboratory for ionosphere research. Its ionospheric heater, similar to the American HAARP, is capable of radiating about 190 MW, effective radiated power (ERP) on short waves. This facility is operated by the radiophysical research institute NIRFI in Nizhny Novgorod.
technical information
The frequency range of the heating facility is from 4.5 to 9.3 MHz. The facility consists of three 250 kW broadcasting transmitters and a 144 crossed dipole antenna-array with dimensions of 300 m x 300 m. At the middle of the operating frequency range (4.5 – 9.3 MHz) a maximum zenith gain of about 260 (~24 dB) is reached, the ERP of the facility is 190 MW (~83 dbW).

“We produced lots of interesting results during the first test of the ionic generator,” said Academician Mikhail Shahramanyan. “A stream of oxygen ions was going up and could either result in a local rupture of the clouds or bring out overcast sky, depending on a work mode of the device. We managed to form cumulonimbus overcast sky over Erevan in April 2004. We used two GIONK type devices when the sky was clear. According to protocols verified by independent observers, between April 15 to April 16 in Erevan precipitation totaled to 25mm-27mm,” said Academician Shahramanyan.

Op maandag 2 oktober 2006 12:36 schreef YuckFou het volgende:
hell wat een wereld

Background of the HAARP Project

Prepared by Rosalie Bertell, Ph.D., GNSH

Military interest in space became intense during and after World War II because of the introduction of rocket science, the companion to nuclear technology. The early versions include the buzz bomb and guided missiles. They were thought of as potential carriers of both nuclear and conventional bombs.

Rocket technology and nuclear weapon technology developed simultaneously between 1945 and 1963. During this time of intensive atmospheric nuclear testing, explosions at various levels above and below the surface of the earth were attempted. Some of the now familiar descriptions of the earth's protective atmosphere, such as the existence of the Van Allen belts, were based on information gained through stratospheric and ionospheric experimentation.

The earth's atmosphere consists of the troposphere, from sea level to about 16 km above the earth's surface; the stratosphere (which contains the ozone level) which extends from about the 16 to 48 km above the earth; and the ionosphere which extends from 48 km to over 50,000 km above the surface of the earth.

The earth's protective atmosphere or "skin" extends beyond 3,200 km above sea level to the large magnetic fields, called the Van Allen Belts, which can capture the charged particles sprayed through the cosmos by the solar and galactic winds. These belts were discovered in 1958 during the first weeks of the operation of America's first satellite, Explorer I. They appear to contain charged particles trapped in the earth's gravity and magnetic fields. Primary galactic cosmic rays enter the solar system from interstellar space, and are made up of protons with energies above 100 MeV, extending up to astronomically high energies. They make up about 100 percent of the high energy rays. Solar rays are generally of lower energy, below 20 MeV (which is still high energy in earth terms). These high energy particles are affected by the earth's magnetic field and by geomagnetic latitude (distance above or below the geomagnetic equator). The flux density of low energy protons at the top of the atmosphere is normally greater at the poles than at the equator. The density also varies with solar activity, being at a minimum when solar flares are at a minimum.

The Van Allen belts capture charged particles (protons, electrons and alpha particles) and these spiral along the magnetic force lines toward the polar regions where the force lines converge. They are reflected back and forth between the magnetic force lines near the poles. The lower Van Allen Belt is about 7700 km above the earth's surface, and the outer Van Allen Belt is about 51,500 km above the surface. According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, the Van Allen belts are most intense along the equator, and effectively absent over the poles. They dip to 400 km over the South Atlantic Ocean, and are about 1,000 km high over the Central Pacific Ocean. In the lower Van Allen Belt, the proton intensity is about 20,000 particles with energy above 30 MeV per second per square centimeter. Electrons reach a maximum energy of 1 MeV, and their intensity has a maximum of 100 million per second per square centimeter. In the outer Belt, proton energy averages only 1 MeV. For compar-ison, most charged particles discharged in a nuclear explosion range between 0.3 and 3 MeV, while diagnostic medical X-ray has peak voltage around 0.5 MeV.
Project Argus (1958)

Between August and September 1958, the US Navy exploded three fission type nuclear bombs 480 km above the South Atlantic Ocean, in the part of the lower Van Allen Belt closest to the earth's surface. In addition, two hydrogen bombs were detonated 160 km over Johnston Island in the Pacific. The military called this "the biggest scientific experiment ever undertaken." It was designed by the US Department of Defense and the US Atomic Energy Commission, under the code name Project Argus. The purpose appears to be to assess the impact of high altitude nuclear explosions on radio transmission and radar operations because of the electromagnetic pulse (EMP), and to increase understanding of the geomagnetic field and the behavior of the charged particles in it.

This gigantic experiment created new (inner) magnetic radiation belts encompassing almost the whole earth, and injected sufficient electrons and other energetic particles into the ionosphere to cause world wide effects. The electrons traveled back and forth along magnetic force lines, causing an artificial "aurora" when striking the atmosphere near the North Pole.

The US Military planned to create a "telecommunications shield" in the ionosphere, reported in 13-20 August 1961, Keesings Historisch Archief (K.H.A.). This shield would be created "in the ionosphere at 3,000 km height, by bringing into orbit 350,000 million copper needles, each 2-4 cm long [total weight 16 kg], forming a belt 10 km thick and 40 km wide, the needles spaced about 100 m apart." This was designed to replace the ionosphere "because telecommunications are impaired by magnetic storms and solar flares." The US planned to add to the number of copper needles if the experiment proved to be successful. This plan was strongly opposed by the Intentional Union of Astronomers.
Project Starfish (1962)

On July 9, 1962, the US began a further series of experiments with the ionosphere. From their description: "one kiloton device, at a height of 60 km and one megaton and one multi-megaton, at several hundred kilometers height" (K.H.A., 29 June 1962). These tests seriously disturbed the lower Van Allen Belt, substantially altering its shape and intensity. "In this experiment the inner Van Allen Belt will be practically destroyed for a period of time; particles from the Belt will be transported to the atmosphere. It is anticipated that the earth's magnetic field will be disturbed over long distances for several hours, preventing radio communication. The explosion in the inner radiation belt will create an artificial dome of polar light that will be visible from Los Angeles" (K.H.A. 11 May 1962). A Fijian Sailor, present at this nuclear explosion, told me that the whole sky was on fire and he thought it would be the end of the world. This was the experiment which called forth the strong protest of the Queen's Astronomer, Sir Martin Ryle in the UK.

"The ionosphere [according to the under-standing at that time] that part of the atmosphere between 65 and 80 km and 280- 320 km height, will be disrupted by mechanical forces caused by the pressure wave following the explosion. At the same time, large quantities of ionizing radiation will be released, further ionizing the gaseous components of the atmosphere at this height. This ionization effect is strengthened by the radiation from the fission products... The lower Van Allen Belt, consisting of charged particles that move along the geomagnetic field lines... will similarly be disrupted. As a result of the explosion, this field will be locally destroyed, while countless new electrons will be introduced into the lower belt" (K.H.A. 11 May 1962). "On 19 July... NASA announced that as a consequence of the high altitude nuclear test of July 9, a new radiation belt had been formed, stretching from a height of about 400 km to 1600 km; it can be seen as a temporary extension of the lower Van Allen Belt" (K.H.A. 5 August 1962).

As explained in the Encyclopedia Britannica: "... Starfish made a much wider belt [than Project Argus] that extends from low altitude out past L=3 [i.e. three earth radiuses or about 13,000 km above the surface of the earth]." Later in 1962, the USSR undertook similar planetary experiments, creating three new radiation belts between 7,000 and 13,000 km above the earth. According to the Encyclopedia, the electron fluxes in the lower Van Allen Belt have changed markedly since the 1962 high- altitude nuclear explosions by the US and USSR, never returning to their former state. According to American scientists, it could take many hundreds of years for the Van Allen Belts to destabilize at their normal levels. (Research done by: Nigel Harle, Borderland Archives, Cortenbachstraat 32, 6136 CH Sittard, Netherlands.)
SPS: Solar Power Satellite Project (1968)

In 1968 the US military proposed Solar Powered Satellites in geostationary orbit some 40,000 km above the earth, which would intercept solar radiation using solar cells on satellites and transmit it via a microwave beam to receiving antennas, called rectennas, on earth. The US Congress mandated the Department of Energy and NASA to prepare an Environmental Impact Assessment on this project, to be completed by June 1980, and costing $25 Million. This project was designed to construct 60 Solar Powered Satellites over a thirty year period at a cost between $500 and $800 thousand million (in 1968 dollars), providing 100 percent of the US energy needs in the year 2025 at a cost of $3000 per kW. At that time, the project cost was two to three times larger than the whole Department of Energy budget, and the projected cost of the electricity was well above the cost of most conventional energy sources. The rectenna sites on earth were expected to take up to 145 square kilometers of land, and would preclude habitation by any humans, animals or even vegetation. Each Satellite was to be the size of Manhattan Island.
Saturn V Rocket (1975)

Due to a malfunction, the Saturn V Rocket burned unusually high in the atmosphere, above 300 km. This burn produced "a large ionospheric hole" (Mendillo, M. Et al., Science p. 187, 343, 1975). The disturbance reduced the total electron content more than 60% over an area 1,000 km in radius, and lasted for several hours. It prevented all telecommunications over a large area of the Atlantic Ocean. The phenomenon was apparently caused by a reaction between the exhaust gases and ionospheric oxygen ions. The reaction emitted a 6300 A airglow. Between 1975 and 1981 NASA and the US Military began to design ways to test this new phenomena through deliberate experimentation with the ionosphere.
SPS Military Implications (1978)

Early review of the Solar Powered Satellite Project began in around 1978, and I was on the review panel. Although this was proposed as an energy program, it had significant military implications. One of the most significant, first pointed out by Michael J. Ozeroff, was the possibility of developing a satellite-borne beam weapon for anti-ballistic missile (ABM) use. The satellites were to be in geosynchronous orbits, each providing an excellent vantage point from which an entire hemisphere can be surveyed continuously. It was speculated that a high-energy laser beam could function as a thermal weapon to disable or destroy enemy missiles. There was some discussion of electron weapon beams, through the use of a laser beam to preheat a path for the following electron beam.

The SPS was also described as a psychological and anti- personnel weapon, which could be directed toward an enemy. If the main microwave beam was redirected away from its rectenna, toward enemy personnel, it could use an infrared radiation wave- length (invisible) as an anti-personnel weapon. It might also be possible to transmit high enough energy to ignite combustible materials. Laser beam power relays could be made from the SPS satellite to other satellites or platforms, for example aircraft, for military purposes. One application might be a laser powered turbofan engine which would receive the laser beam directly in its combustion chamber, producing the required high temperature gas for its cruising operation. This would allow unlimited on-station cruise time. As a psychological weapon, the SPS was capable of causing general panic

The SPS would be able to transmit power to remote military operations anywhere needed on earth. The manned platform of the SPS would provide surveillance and early warning capability, and ELF linkage to submarines. It would also provide the capability of jamming enemy communications. The potential for jamming and creating communications is significant. The SPS was also capable of causing physical changes in the ionosphere

President Carter approved the SPS Project and gave it a go- ahead, in spite of the reservation which many reviewers, myself included, expressed. Fortunately, it was so expensive, exceeding the entire Department of Energy budget, that funding was denied by the Congress. I approached the United Nations Committee on Disarmament on this project, but was told that as long as the program was called Solar Energy by the United States, it could not be considered a weapons project. The same project resurfaced in the US under President Reagan. He moved it to the much larger budget of the Department of Defense and called it Star Wars. Since this is more recent history, I will not discuss the debate which raged over this phase of the plan.

By 1978, it was apparent to the US Military that communications in a nuclear hostile environment would not be possible using traditional methods of radio and television technology (Jane's Military Communications 1978). By 1982, GTE Sylvania (Needham Heights, Massachusetts) had developed a command control electronic sub-system for the US Air Force's Ground Launch Cruise Missiles (GLCM) that would enable military commanders to monitor and control the missile prior to launch both in hostile and non-hostile environments. The system contains six radio subsystems, created with visible light using a dark beam (not visible) and is resistant to the disruptions experienced by radio and television. Dark beams contribute to the formation of energetic plasma in the atmosphere. This plasma can become visible as smog or fog. Some has a different charge than the sun's energy, and accumulates in places where the sun's energy is absent, like the polar regions in the winter. When the polar spring occurs, the sun appears and repels this plasma, contributing to holes in the ozone layer. This military system is called: Ground Wave Emergency Network (GWEN). (See The SECOMII Communication System, by Wayne Olsen, SAND 78- 0391,Sandia Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, April 1978.) This innovative emergency radio system was apparently never implemented in Europe, and exists only in North America.
Orbit Maneuvering System (1981)

Part of the plan to build the SPS space platforms was the demand for reusable space shuttles, since they could not afford to keep discarding rockets. The NASA Spacelab 3 Mission of the Space Shuttle made, in 1981, "a series of passes over a network of five ground based observatories" in order to study what happened to the ionosphere when the Shuttle injected gases into it from the Orbit Maneuvering System (OMS). They discovered that they could "induce ionospheric holes" and began to experiment with holes made in the daytime, or at night over Millstone, Connecticut, and Arecibo, Puerto Rico. They experimented with the effects of "artificially induced ionospheric depletions on very low frequency wave lengths, on equatorial plasma instabilities, and on low frequency radio astronomical observations over Roberval, Quebec, Kwajelein, in the Marshall Islands and Hobart, Tasmania" (Advanced Space Research, Vo1.8, No. 1, 1988).
Innovative Shuttle Experiments (1985)

An innovative use of the Space Shuttle to perform space physics experiments in earth orbit was launched, using the OMS injections of gases to "cause a sudden depletion in the local plasma concentration, the creation of a so called ionospheric hole." This artificially induced plasma depletion can then be used to investigate other space phenomena, such as the growth of the plasma instabilities or the modification of radio propagation paths. The 47 second OMS burn of July 29, 1985, produced the largest and most long-lived ionospheric hole to date, dumping some 830 kg of exhaust into the ionosphere at sunset. A 6 second, 68 km OMS release above Connecticut in August 1985, produced an airglow which covered over 400,000 square km.

During the 1980's, rocket launches globally numbered about 500 to 600 a year, peaking at 1500 in 1989. There were many more during the Gulf War. The Shuttle is the largest of the solid fuel rockets, with twin 45 meter boosters. All solid fuel rockets release large amounts of hydrochloric acid in their exhaust, each Shuttle flight injecting about 75 tons of ozone destroying chlorine into the stratosphere. Those launched since 1992 inject even more ozone-destroying chlorine, about 187 tons, into the stratosphere (which contains the ozone layer).
Mighty Oaks (1986)

In April 1986, just before the Chernobyl disaster, the US had a failed hydrogen test at the Nevada Test Site called Mighty Oaks. This test, conducted far underground, consisted of a hydrogen bomb explosion in one chamber, with a leaded steel door to the chamber, two meters thick, closing within milliseconds of the blast. The door was to allow only the first radioactive beam to escape into the "control room" in which expensive instrumentation was located. The radiation was to be captured as a weapon beam. The door failed to close as quickly as planned, causing the radioactive gases and debris to fill the control room, destroying millions of dollars worth of equipment. The experiment was part of a program to develop X-ray and particle beam weapons. The radioactive releases from Mighty Oaks were vented, under a "licensed venting" and were likely responsible for many of the North American nuclear fallout reports in May 1986, which were attributed to the Chernobyl disaster.
Desert Storm (1991)

According to Defense News, April 13 - 19, 1992, the US deployed an electromagnetic pulse weapon (EMP) in Desert Storm, designed to mimic the flash of electricity from a nuclear bomb. The Sandia National Laboratory had built a 23,000 square meter laboratory on the Kirkland Air Force Base, 1989, to house the Hermes II electron beam generator capable of producing 20 Trillion Watt pulses lasting 20 billionths to 25 billionths of a second. This X-ray simulator is called a Particle Beam Fusion Accelerator. A stream of electrons hitting a metal plate can produce a pulsed X-ray or gamma ray. Hermes II had produced electron beams since 1974. These devises were apparently tested during the Gulf War, although detailed information on them is sparse.
High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program, HAARP (1993)

The HAARP Program is jointly managed by the US Air Force and the US Navy, and is based in Gakona, Alaska. It is designed to "understand, simulate and control ionospheric processes that might alter the performance of communication and surveillance systems." The HAARP system intends to beam 3.6 Gigawatts of effective radiated power of high frequency radio energy into the ionosphere in order to:

* Generate extremely low frequency (ELF) waves for communicating with submerged submarines
* Conduct geophysical probes to identify and characterize natural ionospheric processes so that techniques can be developed to mitigate or control them
* Generate ionospheric lenses to focus large amounts of high frequency energy, thus providing a means of triggering ionospheric processes that potentially could be exploited for Department of Defense purposes,
* Electron acceleration for infrared (IR) and other optical emissions which could be used to control radio wave propagation properties
* Generate geomagnetic field aligned ionization to control the reflection/scattering properties of radio waves,
* Use oblique heating to produce effects on radio wave propagation, thus broadening the potential military applications of ionospheric enhancement technology.

Poker Flat Rocket Launch (1968 to Present)

The Poker Flat Research Range is located about 50 km North of Fairbanks, Alaska, and it was established in 1968. It is operated by the Geophysical Institute with the University of Alaska Fairbanks, under NASA contract. About 250 major rocket launches have taken place from this site, and in 1994, a 16 meter long rocket was launched to help NASA "understand chemical reactions in the atmosphere associated with global climate change." Similar experiments, but using Chemical Release Modules (CRM), have been launched from Churchill, Manitoba. In 1980, Brian Whelan's "Project Waterhole" disrupted an aurora borealis, bringing it to a temporary halt. In February 1983, the chemical released into the ionosphere caused an aurora borealis over Churchill. In March 1989, two Black Brant X's and two Nike Orion rockets were launched over Canada, releasing barium at high altitudes and creating artificial clouds. These Churchill artificial clouds were observed from as far away as Los Alamos, New Mexico.

The US Navy has also been carrying on High Power Auroral Stimulation (HIPAS) research in Alaska. Through a series of wires and a 15 meter antenna, they have beamed high intensity signals into the upper atmosphere, generating a controlled disturbance in the ionosphere. As early as 1992, the Navy talked of creating 10 kilometer long antennas in the sky to generate extremely low frequency (ELF) waves needed for communicating with submarines. Another purpose of these experiments is to study the Aurora Borealis, called by some an outdoor plasma lab for studying the principles of fusion. Shuttle flights are now able to generate auroras with an electron beam. On November 10, 1991, and aurora borealis appeared in the Texas sky for the first time ever recorded, and it was seen by people as far away as Ohio and Utah, Nebraska and Missouri. The sky contained "Christmas colors" and various scientists were quick to blame it on solar activity. However, when pressed most would admit that the ionosphere must have been weakened at the time, so that the electrically charged particle hitting the earth's atmosphere created the highly visible light called airglow. These charged particles are normally pulled northwards by the earth's magnetic forces, to the magnetic north pole. The Northern Lights, as the aurora borealis is called, normally occurs in the vortex at the pole where the energetic particles, directed by the magnetic force lines, are directed.
Conclusions

It would be rash to assume that HAARP is an isolated experiment which would not be expanded. It is related to fifty years of intensive and increasingly destructive programs to understand and control the upper atmosphere.

It would be rash not to associate HAARP with the space laboratory construction which is separately being planned by the United States. HAARP is an integral part of a long history of space research and development of a deliberate military nature.

The military implications of combining these projects is alarming.

Basic to this project is control of communications, both disruption and reliability in hostile environments. The power wielded by such control is obvious.

The ability of the HAARP / Spacelab/ rocket combination to deliver very large amount of energy, comparable to a nuclear bomb, anywhere on earth via laser and particle beams, are frightening.

The project is likely to be "sold" to the public as a space shield against incoming weapons, or, for the more gullible, a devise for repairing the ozone layer.

Op maandag 2 oktober 2006 13:06 schreef Lambiekje het volgende:
Hoe verrassend dat Russia ook z'n ding heeft ...

Waar gaat het heen...
Weatherwar / Extraterristial War en de General way of War met gewoon soldaten.

By Nicholas Jones From http://educate-yourself.org/mc/mctotalcontrol12jul02.shtml

Earth is wrapped in a donut shaped magnetic field. Circular lines of magnetic flux continuously descend into the North Pole and emerge from the South Pole. The Ionosphere, an electromagnetic-wave conductor, 100 kilometers [62 miles] above the earth, consists of a layer of electrically charged particles acting as a shield from solar winds.

In Encounter in the Pleiades by Peter Moon and Preston Nichols,

http://www.time-travel.com/skybooks/
Preston wrote that:

"Dr. Nicholas Begich has picked up 435 MHz signals connected to HAARP and that a mind control function is being employed. He says that 400-450 MHz is the window to human consciousness because it is our reality's background frequency."

Tim Rifat wrote in his Microwave Mind Control in the UK article
http://www.brazilboycott.org/

that cellular phones use 435 MHz. UK police use 450 MHz exclusively. Dr. Ross Adey used this for CIA behavioral modification experiments. Police have a vast array of antennae to broadcast this frequency all over the UK. Adey used 0.75mW/cm2 intensity of pulse modulate microwave at a frequency of 450 MHz, with an ELF modulation to control all aspects of human behavior. 450 MHZ radar modulated at 60 Hz greatly reduced T-lymphocyte activity to kill cultured cancer cells. A study of USA 60 Hz powerlines repeated this finding.

Op zondag 1 oktober 2006 02:46 schreef Oksel het volgende:
Kan iemand in 1 zin samenvatten wat die installatie in Canada doet?

Op maandag 2 oktober 2006 18:40 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:

[..]

De installatie in Alaska doet onderzoek naar ionospherische processen die mogelijk van invloed kunnen zijn op communicatie en navigatie systemen.

Op maandag 2 oktober 2006 19:33 schreef Resonancer het volgende:

[..]

Bijna goed, als je erbij zou zeggen dat ze die ionospherische processen beinvloeden, en de toepassingen communicatie en navigatie systemen uit zou breiden met o.a. geofysisch onderzoek (naar b.v. aardolie), weersbeinvloeding en 'n missile sheeld . Dat is tenminste wat de bouwer Eastlund ervan zegt, en om het nou beter te weten dan hem?
http://www.eastlundscience.com/index.html

Op maandag 2 oktober 2006 18:40 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:
De installatie in Alaska doet onderzoek naar ionospherische processen die mogelijk van invloed kunnen zijn op communicatie en navigatie systemen.

Op maandag 2 oktober 2006 20:02 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:

[..]

Geen idee wie het verder is maar ja. In dat geval denk ik het beter te weten ja.

Op maandag 2 oktober 2006 20:02 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:
Geen idee wie het verder is maar ja. In dat geval denk ik het beter te weten ja.

Op maandag 2 oktober 2006 20:28 schreef Resonancer het volgende:

[..]

Je weet het dus beter dan de bouwer zelf? Ik gebruik hem niet vaak maar nu moet ik het wel :

Op maandag 2 oktober 2006 20:11 schreef YuckFou het volgende:

[..]

Heb jij Uberhaupt dit topic doorgelezen?

Op maandag 2 oktober 2006 20:28 schreef Resonancer het volgende:

[..]

Je weet het dus beter dan de bouwer zelf? Ik gebruik hem niet vaak maar nu moet ik het wel :

Op maandag 2 oktober 2006 21:41 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:
Nou weet ik toevallig wel wat van radiogolven af ja en wat er hier allemaal beweerd wordt is hier grotendeels niet mee te doen

Het zou bijvoorbeeld ook eens leuk zijn om naar de luchtlaag te kijken waar het hier over gaat en waar deze zich bevind in de atmosfeer.

Op maandag 2 oktober 2006 21:53 schreef YuckFou het volgende:

[..]

Okay

Als jij zo zeker van je zaak bent dat je het beter weet dan de ontwerper en patenthouder van deze installatie dan vraag ik je hierbij om een uitgebreide reply waarin je omschrijft waarom het volgens jou onmogelijk is, graag met bijbehorende links en bronnen, een uiteenzetting waar meneer Eastlund dan volgens jou de mist in is gegaan en waarom DOD er toch honderden miljoenen, zo niet miljarden dollars in heeft gepompt om HAARP op te zetten en in bedrijf te stellen, en kom niet met metingen van de ionosfeer aanzetten, want meten doe je voor het overgrote deel met ontvangers en niet met een zender

_{misschien ten overvloede, een reply van een paar regels word in deze niet gewaardeerd}

Is HAARP capable of affecting the weather?
The HAARP facility will not affect the weather. Transmitted energy in the frequency ranges that will be used by HAARP is not absorbed in either the troposphere or the stratosphere - the two levels of the atmosphere that produce the earth's weather. Electromagnetic interactions only occur in the near-vacuum of the rarefied region above about 70 km known as the ionosphere.

The ionosphere is created and continuously replenished as the sun's radiation interacts with the highest levels of the Earth's atmosphere. The downward coupling from the ionosphere to the stratosphere/troposphere is extremely weak, and no association between natural ionospheric variability and surface weather and climate has been found, even at the extraordinarily high levels of ionospheric turbulence that the sun can produce during a geomagnetic storm. If the ionospheric storms caused by the sun itself don't affect the surface weather, there is no chance that HAARP can do so either.
HAARP FAQ

'Small Input, Big Effect'

HAARP zaps the ionosphere where it is relatively unstable. A point to remember is that the ionosphere is an active electrical shield protecting the planet from the constant bombardment of high-energy particles from space. This conducting plasma, along with Earth's magnetic field, traps the electrical plasma of space and holds it back from going directly to the earth's surface, says Charles Yost of Dynamic Systems, Leicester, North Carolina.

"If the ionosphere is greatly disturbed, the atmosphere below is subsequently disturbed.".

Another scientist interviewed said there is a super-powerful electrical connection between the ionosphere and the part of the atmosphere where our weather comes onstage, the lower atmosphere.

One man-made electrical effect - power line harmonic resonance - causes fallout of charged particles from the Van Allen (radiation) belts, and the falling ions cause ice crystals (which precipitate rain clouds).

What about HAARP? Energy blasted upward from an ionospheric heater is not much compared to the total in the ionosphere, but HAARP documents admit that thousandfold-greater amounts of energy can be released in the ionosphere than injected. As with MacDonald's "key to geophysical warfare", "nonlinear" effects (described in the literature about the ionospheric heater) mean small input and large output. Astrophysicist Adam Trombly told Manning that an acupuncture model is one way to look at the possible effect of multi-gigawatt pulsing of the ionosphere. If HAARP hits certain points , those parts of the ionosphere could react in surprising ways.

Smaller ionospheric heaters such as the one at Arecibo are underneath relatively placid regions of the ionosphere, compared to the dynamic movements nearer Earth's magnetic poles. That adds another uncertainty to HAARP - the unpredictable and lively upper atmosphere near the North Pole.

HAARP experimenters do not impress common sense Alaskans such as Barbara Zickuhr, who says "They're like boys playing with a sharp stick, finding a sleeping bear and poking it in the butt to see what's going to happen."
bron

Op maandag 2 oktober 2006 22:21 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:
bron: wiki en een goed boek over zendammateurs en alles wat er bij komt kijken.

Op maandag 2 oktober 2006 21:41 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:

[..]

Nou weet ik toevallig wel wat van radiogolven af ja en wat er hier allemaal beweerd wordt is hier grotendeels niet mee te doen

Het zou bijvoorbeeld ook eens leuk zijn om naar de luchtlaag te kijken waar het hier over gaat en waar deze zich bevind in de atmosfeer.

Nicholas Begich --actively involved in the public campaign against HAARP-- describes HAARP as:

"A super-powerful radiowave-beaming technology that lifts areas of the ionosphere by focusing abeam and heating those areas. Electromagnetic waves then bounce back onto earth and penetrate everything -- living and dead."

The book discusses much of the research and effects of short and long term exposure to low power EM waves such as cell phones and power lines. It quotes scientists and researchers who are dismayed by the possibility of government controlled mind-manipulation and remind us that the power required to effect the brain directly is less than 1/50 of that of the earth's magnetic field. The specter of a new Mental Battlefield and telepathic weapons is a clear concern for the authors.

WEATHER MODIFICATION WITH HIGH POWER ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIOTION

ESEC has recently completed a contract with the European Space Agency to review the weather modification potential of the HAARP facility in Alaska and to perform numerical simulations of tornado suppression with high power electromagnetic radiation produced with Solar Power Satellites. Two papers, available below, have been published.

Some of the highlights contained in these reports are:

* HAARP
* MISSILE SHIELD ANTENNA (terrawatt phased array antenna)
* NORTH SLOPE GAS CONCEPT WEATHER MODIFICATION
* OZONE HOLE MITIGATION
* HIGH POWER SOLAR SATELLITES FOR WEATHER MODIFICATION
* POWER RELAY IONOSPHERIC MIRROS
* INTERVENTION IN TORNADOGENESIS
* SAFETY

http://www.eastlundscience.com/currentd.html

J. Eastlund's US Patent No: 4,686,605 entitled "Method and Apparatus for Altering a Region in the Earth's Atmosphere, Ionosphere and/or Magnetosphere".

Washington --as part of its nuclear posture review-- has threatened several countries including China and Russia with pre-emptive nuclear strikes. One would assume that the same targeting of rogue states exists with regard to the use of weather modification techniques".

While there is no evidence of the use of weather warfare against rogue states, the policy guidelines on "weather intervention techniques" have already been established and the technology is fully operational.

Op maandag 2 oktober 2006 21:53 schreef YuckFou het volgende:

[..]

Okay

_{misschien ten overvloede, een reply van een paar regels word in deze niet gewaardeerd}

The HAARP program is jointly managed by the Air Force Research Laboratory and the Office of Naval Research. The facility is being constructed by commercial contractors through a contract with ONR.
(...)
Many of the scientific instruments at the ionospheric observatory operate continuously to monitor the natural geomagnetic environment. Data collected by these instruments are archived and made available in chart format in real time on our web site.
(...)
We recognize that there is great interest in the scientific work of the facility and, as a result, we hold an annual open house, generally of two days duration, at which any and all are invited to visit the site and take photographs of the buildings and instruments located there. Several scientists are usually present at these open houses so that visitors can talk directly with those who use the facility for research. Open houses have been held since 1995 and have proven to be a popular event.
(...)
HAARP is not classified. There are no classified documents pertaining to HAARP. The Environmental Impact Process (EIP) documents have always been, are now, and will always be completely descriptive of the program in its entirety. The EIP documents are a matter of public record.
(...)
The scientists who conduct research at HAARP are university physicists, their students, government scientists and scientists from commercial firms having an interest in communication and radio science theory and applications.

Op maandag 2 oktober 2006 22:38 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:
Grappig dat je niet ingaat op de argumenten. Heb je ook een reden waarom zendammateurs zich hier buiten zouden moeten houden? Ik heb wel eens in die frequentie range gewerkt. Gebruik gemaakt van die lagen. Jij ook?

Eastlund's patent said the technology can confuse or completely disrupt airplanes' and missiles' sophisticated guidance systems. Further, this ability to spray large areas of Earth with electromagnetic waves of varying frequencies, and to control changes in those waves, makes it possible to knock out communications on land or sea as well as in the air. The patent said:

"Thus, this invention provides the ability to put unprecedented amounts of power in the Earth's atmosphere at strategic locations and to maintain the power injection level, particularly if random pulsing is employed, in a manner far more precise and better controlled than heretofore accomplished by the prior art, particularly by detonation of nuclear devices of various yields at various altitudes..."

'..it is possible not only to interfere with third party communications but to take advantage of one or more such beams to carry out a communications network even though the rest of the world's communications are disrupted. Put another way, what is used to disrupt another's communications can be employed by one knowledgeable of this invention as a communication network at the same time."

.'.. large regions of the atmosphere could be lifted to an unexpectedly high altitude so that missiles encounter unexpected and unplanned drag forces with resultant destruction ...

" Weather modification is possible by, for example, altering upper atmosphere wind patterns by constructing one or more plumes of atmospheric particles which will act as a lens or focusing device. ... molecular modifications of the atmosphere can take place so that positive environmental effects can be achieved. Besides actually changing the molecular composition of an atmospheric region, a particular molecule or molecules can be chosen for increased presence. For example, ozone, nitrogen, etc., concentrations in the atmosphere could be artificially increased...

Op maandag 2 oktober 2006 22:45 schreef Resonancer het volgende:

[..]

Heel leuk om te weten i.d.d. waar de ionosfeer zich bevind, is heeeel ver weg en kan dus niet van invloed zijn, probeer je zoiets te zeggen? Denk je dat je hier met 'n kleuter praat ofzo?
De Ionosfeer kan EM velden terugkaatsen, en Mind/Weather altering (sorry Yuck Fou) behoort dan wel degelijk tot de mogelijkheden.

Kijk hier maar 's naar, Haarp staat niet alleen maar maakt onderdeel uit van n veel groter project,

Best gek dat ze dit allemaal onderzoeken, ik zal ze ff zeggen dat ze maar beter kunnen stoppen, want volgens tuinhekje kan het niet werken.

Je stelling " Haarp is om te onderzoeken" is pertinent onjuist:

Als er researching had gestaan had je gelijk gehad, maar zelfs dan weet je niet waar het toe zou leiden.
Over research gesproken:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO409F.html

Ik zal je voor zijn, keihard bewijs voor weermanipulatie is er i.d.d. niet.

Op maandag 2 oktober 2006 23:08 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:
Dat wist ik al. Zijn wel meerdere van dergelijke onderzoekscentra in de wereld.
Oh dat zou in theorie vast wel kunnen werken

Daar heb je echter (volgens die artikelen ook btw) VEEL meer vermogen en totaal andere frequenties voor nodig. Microgolven bijv.

Ionospheric research facilities have been in continuous use since the 1950's to investigate fundamental physical principles which govern the earth's ionosphere, so that present and future transmission technologies may take into account the complexities of the ionosphere. At the present time the US operates two ionospheric research sites, one in Puerto Rico, near the Arecibo Observatory, and the other (known as HIPAS) in Alaska near Fairbanks. Both of these employ active and passive radio instrumentation similar to that being built at HAARP. Interest in the ionosphere is not limited to the US: a five-country consortium operates the European Incoherent Scatter Radar site (EISCAT), a premier world-class ionospheric research facility located in northern Norway near Troms�. Facilities also are located at Jicamarca, Peru; near Moscow, Nizhny Novgorod ("SURA") and Apatity, Russia; near Kharkov, Ukraine and in Dushanbe, Tadzhikistan. All of these installations have as their primary purpose the study of the ionosphere, and most employ the capability of stimulating to a varying degree small, localized regions of the ionosphere in order to study methodically, and in a detailed manner what nature produces randomly and regularly on a much larger scale. HAARP also will have such a capability, but what sets HAARP apart from existing facilities is the unusual combination of a research tool which provides electronic beam steering, wide frequency coverage and high effective radiated power collocated with a diverse suite of scientific observational instruments.

Op maandag 2 oktober 2006 23:37 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:
Dat patent wat maar terug blijft komen lijkt hier nogal heilig te zijn. Ik heb hem dus eens opgezocht en daar staat toch wel ff iets heel anders dan hier eerder geclaimd werd
http://tinyurl.com/rtwda
edit: oeps, hoe deed je ook alweer kleine url's?

edit2: dan maar zo

Op maandag 2 oktober 2006 23:33 schreef YuckFou het volgende:

[..]

[..]

In plat nederlands, ze kunnen de straal richten, een wijd frequentiespectrum bereiken (van ELF tot UHF) en een ongekend groot vermogen genereren (> 1GW), maar doe mij nou een lol, lees een aantal links eens door die eerder gegeven worden, ik begrijp wel dat je er niet echt aanwil dat ze hier met jou&mijn atmosfeer lopen te fucken, maar dat is toch echt wat er gebeurt, en op een schaal die z'n gelijke niet kent...

Op maandag 2 oktober 2006 23:59 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:
Oh wacht mijn fout

het staat pas bij de beschrijving van de plaatjes

Op dinsdag 3 oktober 2006 00:17 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:
De zenders van HAARP werken tussen 2.8 en 10 MHz. Dat is HF. Wil je mij dan ook een lol doen en zorgen dat je de juiste feiten hebt?

The ionosphere is a layer of charged particles (or "ions") located about 60-90 kilometers above the Earth's surface. It is the layer which reflects short wave radio waves and makes it possible for a transmitter in New York to send a signal to Tokyo. Short waves may be good enough to send The Voice of America broadcasts, but they are subject to noise and static. Short wave signals lose much of their power as they travel and can even be blocked by the weather and sunspot activity.

Extremely High Frequency waves, on the other hand, are much shorter than short waves. They travel in compact, narrowly focused, beams. They do not encounter static or deteriorate from rain or clouds. Since they retain their strength over long distances, they are preferred for most point-to-point communications. Unfortunately, though, EHF waves (including microwaves) do not naturally reflect and bounce off of the ionosphere. For this reason, high frequency waves are said to propagate along the "line of sight." If you own a satellite television dish, you know that it is important for your antenna to be pointed in the direction of the satellite. This is because you are receiving extremely high frequency waves.

Eastlund's discovery involved beaming High Frequency (HF) and Extremely High Frequency (EHF) waves, of extremely high power (over a billion watts), directly at a point on the ionosphere. When this was done, the ionosphere became heated from the accumulating electrical energy. You might think of it as "cooking" the atmosphere.

The heated portion of the ionosphere expands like heated plastic and is raised to a higher altitude, causing an atmospheric "bulge." Eastlund discovered that this bulge was highly reflective to radio waves, and, because of its altitude, it could bounce high frequency radio signals to points well beyond the horizon. Even efficient ELF and microwaves signals, which normally would pass through the ionosphere into space, could be deflected without much loss of strength. He called this heated "bulge" the "lens effect."

Op dinsdag 3 oktober 2006 08:37 schreef YuckFou het volgende:

[..]

Wat staat er dan volgens jou?

En als je de plaatjes hebt gezien?

Als je de moeite had genomen meer te lezen dan alleen het patent was je intussen wel duidelijk geworden dat HAARP meerdere golflengtes dan dat kan uitzenden, hoe wil je anders ELF communicatie met onderzeers bereiken?
<snip>
Ga je je nu eerst eens verder inlezen voor je hier komt meepraten? ik krijg bij jou het 'pietje77' gevoel, alleen dan omgekeerd, hij kan het niet laten alles wat 'ie tot nu toe in conspiracy-land gelezen heeft er aan de haren bij te slepen, jij kijkt niet verder dan je neus lang is...

Op dinsdag 3 oktober 2006 12:41 schreef ATuin-hek het volgende:
Kan dat ook eens niet ofzo?

Op maandag 2 oktober 2006 22:53 schreef Wombcat het volgende:

[..]

Iha doe je metingen met ontvangers en niet met zenders. Toch kun je niet bij voorbaat uitsluiten dat door middel van info zenden, je dingen gaat meten. Met radar en sonar zend je ook een signaal uit, om daar vervolgens info mee te vergaren.

De link in je laatste post hierboven, geeft o.a. aan:
[..]

Er wordt (o.a. met commerci�le instanties gewerkt, er zijn regelmatige open dagen en HAARP is niet geheim, de data die er verzameld wordt ook niet (en wordt zelfs in realtime op de website gepubliceerd) en ter plekke werken mensen van universiteiten (inclusief studenten) en mensen van commerci�le instanties.

Dit alles wekt nu niet direct bij mij de indruk dat er daar gewerkt wordt aan een geheim militair wapen. Dan zou heel die installatie veel meer geheim zijn. Van Area 51 weet eigenlijk ook niemand wat er nu precies gebeurd, waarom zouden ze hier dan zo open over zijn?

Op maandag 2 oktober 2006 22:45 schreef Resonancer het volgende:
De Ionosfeer kan EM velden terugkaatsen, en Mind/Weather altering (sorry Yuck Fou) behoort dan wel degelijk tot de mogelijkheden.

Op dinsdag 3 oktober 2006 13:08 schreef YuckFou het volgende:

[..]

D'r is ook niks geheims aan dat is juist het enge, de 'bill' die ingediend is over 'weather modification' is net zo openbaar als de hele HAARP installatie, en kennelijk is er niemand die zich er druk overmaakt, kan het ons een reet schelen of ze het weer kunnen beinvloeden, de USA is voor ons bondgenoten toch volkomen te vertrouwen en fucken met systemen die al miljoenen zo niet miljarden jaren met elkaar in balans zijn zal vast wel goed gaan...

om m'n gezeik even iets te verduidelijken:
IK BEN VOOR DIT DING VEEL BANGER DAN VOOR GLOBAL WARMING, TERORRISME, PEAK OIL EN NOEM ALLE ELLENDE MAAR OP DIE JE KAN VERZINNEN
als 't misgaat heren, dan kan de ionosfeer dermate hard veranderen dat we ons zonneschild kwijt zijn,
en ja then we're fucked...

Op dinsdag 3 oktober 2006 13:38 schreef YuckFou het volgende:

Geloof jij daar eigenlijk serieus in?

Op dinsdag 3 oktober 2006 19:59 schreef pietje77 het volgende:
De kans dat je de massa hun ogen opent ivm. H.A.A.R.P. is verwaarloosbaar. Ook al zal er uiteindelijk geen groter gevaar zijn waarschijnlijk ja...
Techniek is in essentie neutraal en ligt het gevaar uiteraard bij de mensen die het beheersen.
Daar ligt mijn grootste angst, als we de "mensen" van de 9-11 inside job niet exposen(haalbaar) kunnen we ooit nog eens de H.A.A.R.P. inside job bespreken(hoewel het vrij reeel is, sinds Ben Livingston, dat het al gebruikt is).

Op woensdag 1 november 2006 10:20 schreef Kadesh het volgende:
Heeft iemand die instalatie kunnen vinden op google-earth?

THE ROLE OF HAARP IN THE WTC ATTACK
HAARP is now a major portion of the U.S. miltary's world command and control system

BJ News (Oct. 19, 2001) HAARP, a massively powerful shortwave transmitter in Alaska, operated by the U.S. Navy, Air Force and a group of universities, was last on the air 3 days ago at medium power with no military pre-tones indicating on-going university research during the dark of the new moon on Oct 15. This experiment was also performed in the same manner for 2 days last month during the dark of the moon around September 16th. Other than that, HAARP has virtually not been on the air for the last 6 months, except for dark moon periods. This normal university research program indicates that something distinctly and critically different occurred at HAARP on September 11th and the day following the World Trade Center attack.

Within the first 3 hours after the WTC attack, President Bush placed the U.S. military on world-wide highest DefCon Four alert. The U.S. has a fleet of about 27 active duty nuclear submarines many of which are on duty stations at secret locations deep in the oceans around the world. When in deep water the submarines can only receive communication from the outside world by ULF radio transmissions in the range of 1 to 10 Hz. How could they all be notified of the WTC DefCon Four alert?

Just hours after the WTC attack, and shortly after Bush announced the military alert, HAARP began maximum power transmission using the standard military 6.25 second pulses with the military pre-tones, and the long and short 30 and 15 second coded pauses between the pulses. With proper modulation, HAARP is the only transmitter which can send ULF signals in the range of 1 to 10 Hz world-wide. This lasted for just over an hour from 3:15 to 4:20 PM local time. Using the very slow binary code speed for ULF communication this would be sufficient to send a two or three sentence "alert" message with the reason for the alert to the very deep submarines.

Exactly four hours later, HAARP returned to the air at maximum power, again using the military message protocol to send a lengthy more detailed 5 hour set of instructions for the submarines from 8:30 PM to about 1:30 AM the next day. This would provide sufficient time to send new assigned locations and order new pre-selected missile targets. Since those 2 transmissions on September 11th, HAARP has not been on during the day at high power, nor used the standard military pulses and spacings.

This would tend to prove that not only is HAARP capable of communicating with the U.S. deep submarine nuclear fleet, but is actually the only reliable communication means used by the U.S. Navy for emergency world-wide alert submarine communications and that HAARP is actually an operational military facility. That would be the only explanation of the unique HAARP transmissions right after a world-wide US military alert is announced. Its nice when you can prove a theory with real data. Despite the Navy's numerous disclaimers, the BroJon Gazette has for over a year been the only source which has claimed and proven that the Navy is using HAARP as its primary operational communication system with the nuclear sub fleet. Can the proof of our explanation about the use of HAARP by the Air Force as a primary space-warfare weapon, be far behind?

HAARP (High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) is a high-powered radio transmission research facility jointly operated by the US Navy, Air Force and several universities. Because of the high secrecy surrounding the government HAARP project, many theories have risen trying to explain what HAARP is and does. Most of them are simply wild speculations, based on fears about what "they are doing up there." It is the purpose of this article to provide sufficient technical expertise to dispel the mystery.

The above HAARP signal was monitored on 3.39 MHZ and recorded in San Jose, California, about 5,000 miles from the transmitter in Gakona, eastern central Alaska. At that distance and frequency, the signal can only be heard during the night after two F-layer ionospheric skips. Some short-term signal fading over the signal path may be the cause for the variations in the smooth roll-off in the amplitude from 1 sec to the end of the pulse at 6.25 secs. These loud 6 second pulses are usually repeated with a quiet 15 or 30 second pause between pulses.

1. HAARP and ULF (Ultra Low Frequency) Waves

The HAARP sound recording may seem full of static. It is not. The rushing roaring sound of a blow torch is the HAARP signal itself, as shown by the silence or background noise of the receiver at the end of the pulse, and by the clarity of the tones at the beginning. If you wanted to see or hear the ULF (ultra low frequency) waves sent out by the HAARP transmitter, you will be disappointed here.

My receiver is not equipped to record ULF waves in the region of 1 to 10 Hz, and has an audio roll-off in the range of about 30 Hz. And besides, you can't hear or see a 0.9 or 1 Hz signal anyway. It is way below the range of normal human hearing. You need instruments to sense it. A powerful 1 Hz sound would probably be "sensed" as a slow rolling earthquake or a slight rocking motion as on the ocean. Nonetheless, a major component and purpose of the HAARP signal is an audio modulation at the frequency of about 0.9 Hz. And what is that purpose? I'll get to that in a moment.

2. HAARP Interaction with the Atmosphere

The HAARP pulse is primarily divided into two components. The first part is the sections marked A and B on the chart and is the powerful "pre-heat" megawatt pulse aimed upward at the ionosphere just above the HAARP facility. As the radio waves travel up through the atmosphere they have no effect until they reach the ionosphere about 200 kilometers above the earth, which is far above the atmosphere. At that point the waves interact with the ions, which may be electrons, protons or ionized parts of atoms like oxygen, ozone or nitrogen.

Normally the particles in the near vacuum of outer-space in the region of the ionosphere are simply moving randomly in all directions. Some particles may hit each other and re-combine into normal atoms of oxygen and nitrogen, thus simply becoming a part of the atmosphere. Other particles may drift off into space and others may move downward into the thicker atmosphere where they re-combine. Then along comes the HAARP signal.

For about a quarter second during the part A and B of the pulse, the randomly moving ions are now forced to madly race back and forth in the direction of the radio waves at the speed of light or 300,000 kilometers per second, which is real fast. Many of them strike atoms in the upper atmosphere and cause the atoms to also become ionized. Thus the number of ions is suddenly increased. Since the neutral atoms in the atmosphere do not react to the radio waves, they remain more or less stationary, and become "sitting ducks" just waiting to be hit by one of the billions of racing ions all rushing back and forth in response to the HAARP waves.

Even if the neutral atoms don't become ionized, many of them are struck by the fast ions and soon most of the atmospheric atoms high above the HAARP transmitter are also rushing in all directions but not back and forth as are the ions. This sudden increase in the motion of both the atoms and ions in the upper atmosphere is called "ionospheric heating." In fact, the HAARP facility, along with several similar research instruments in Europe and Russia, are in the category of Ionospheric Heaters. But its what HAARP does next during the part C of the pulse which makes HAARP unique.

3. Components of the HAARP Pulse

In portion A of the pulse, identifier tones are sent at frequencies of 360, 1000 and 1700 Hz, with some harmonics at higher frequencies visible on the graph. In part B the tones are 650 Hz with a harmonic at 1300 Hz. On the chart the yellow color indicates a very strong signal, the green indicates a medium strength signal and the blue shows a weak signal.

In part C of the signal there is a continuous tone at 2100 Hz which remains during the whole pulse and sometimes several seconds afterward. There is also a much weaker tone around 2500 Hz during all of the pulse. And then there is all that green/yellow stuff at the bottom, sloping upward to the right during all of part C. What the heck is that? To explain that we need to look at the HAARP antenna itself.

fig 2. HAARP Antenna Arrary.
Showing the crossed beams of the circularly polarized antennas.
The HAARP "antenna farm" consists of 48 towers, soon to be 180, about 25 meters tall and each is topped with a pair of crossed beams in a north-south and east-west direction. The actual radiating parts of the antenna include those wires dangling from the ends of the beams.
By sloping the wires and hooking all the antennas together they act as one large single antenna covering 33 acres which can transmit in the north-south or east-west direction.

4. HAARP Circular Polarization

If HAARP only used the north-south beams then the electrons and protons in the ionosphere would race madly in the north-south direction. And likewise if the radio waves move in the east-west direction, so would the ions. What HAARP does is on each portion of the transmitter cycle it switches from the east-west to the north-south beams and back again.

If you could see the radio waves rising from the antenna they would appear to be spiraling or "cork-screwing" upward. This is called "circular polarization" of the radio signal. This is not uncommon, since all commercial FM stations use circular polarization to send horizontal signals to home roof antennas and vertical signals to automobile antennas.

But HAARP is not broadcasting to homes or autos, nor is it switching on each cycle. No, the HAARP signal is corkscrewing upward at a rate of, TADA!, about 0.9 Hz. And why is that? By corkscrewing the signal, the ions in the upper atmosphere do not just race madly back and forth, instead they move in BIG circles. And you can get the most ions running around the "race course" just above HAARP if you make them have a "lap time" of about once per second.

5. Optimizing the HAARP Rotation

What determines the optimum "lap time" is something called the plasma density and is related to the temperature, number of ions, number of neutral atoms in the ionosphere, and some other factors I won't mention here. (Note: For more information on plasma density consult any of the many graduate texts on plasma physics. Also, I have oversimplified the relation between the 0.9 Hz signal and the "lap time." It is not my purpose here to provide a complete description of ionospheric cyclotronic interactions.)

By making the ions, both electrons and protons, move in big circles they each become little electromagnets with a north and south pole. At the latitude of HAARP in Gakona, Alaska the earth's magnetic field lines are nearly vertical. So if the HAARP circular polarization is either clockwise or counter-clockwise you can make the ions racing around at 0.9 Hz either be attracted to the earth's magnetic north pole or repelled. If the circling ions are attracted, then they would simply spiral downward toward the earth's north pole and run into the denser atmosphere and might produce a very weak aurora, hence the name High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program. That's all very interesting but its not exactly the real purpose of HAARP.

6. HAARP as a "Particle Gun"

If the HAARP signal rotates so the ions circle around with their north poles pointing downward, then they are repelled by the earth's magnetic north pole and are shot out into the vacuum of space at nearly the speed of light. Wow, you mean HAARP is a particle gun? You betcha! The largest one around, sorta.

But its not really a "gun" because you can't aim it at anything. The particles simply shoot off into space. But they are still spiraling and are magnetic, and as a result they follow along the earth's magnetic field. In less than half a second they arrive at the earth's south pole. There, they don't even touch the atmosphere but are caused to spiral more tightly by the earth's converging magnetic field lines, until they are made to flip over and are shot right back to the north pole, all in less than a second. Thus HAARP is really a particle injector which fires billions of ions into the "magnetic bottle" of the earth's magnetosphere, where they remain trapped for a long time.

7. Uses of the HAARP Particle Injection Device

So what can you do with a particle injector like HAARP? According to the original patent design, this device could be used to produce a thick blanket of fast particles in the region of the magnetosphere which would knock out any electronic controls on, or possibly completely destroy, any space vehicle which flew through it. This was most interesting in the 1980's when the patent was filed and even in 1990 when the US government decided to build HAARP. At that time the main nuclear threat was the USSR and any missile from Russia aimed at the US would need to pass through the magnetosphere over the north pole.

By deploying the HAARP system, no missiles from Russia would reach the US. None. Zero. And that is pretty effective! Most people think of an ICBM as a kind of big rock or arrow. You just lob it from here and it sorta lands on the target over there. Not so. An ICBM is a space vehicle. It must take off using a large booster rocket, travel at near orbital speed in the vacuum of space until it is over the target then it must re-enter the atmosphere.

To survive re-entry the missile must use one of several schemes, like retro rockets, or deploying an ablative heat shield to protect the warhead from simply burning up in the atmosphere. If the missile's computer controls are destroyed when passing through the magnetosphere then the missile will not survive re-entry and will simply burn up like a piece of space junk or a meteor. There's a good chance the missile's control systems are destroyed even before the second stage separates from the booster, thus the missile never even arrives over the target.

8. The HAARP Shield and the "Cold War"

In the 1980's and '90's a number of Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI or "Star Wars") programs were developed. All of them, which relied on shooting particle beams, lasers or anti-ballistic missiles at the target were made obsolete and useless in the early 1980's. I know, since I worked on a number of them. They all relied on knowing where the target was and then shooting something at the target. The development of non-radar-reflective paint and surfaces, or stealth technology, meant you can't tell where the target is. If you don't know where it is, how can you shoot at it? The only effective defensive shield concept was and is HAARP.

My suspicion is, the decision to build HAARP in 1990 was one of the major reasons for the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. Since ALL soviet missiles would be destroyed before re-entering the atmosphere, the USSR had neither an offensive nor defensive missile weapons system, other than nuclear submarines. The US could turn on and off the HAARP shield at will, so it was almost like putting the "shields" up or down on Captain Kirk's Enterprise on the "real" Star Wars. You put the shields down to fire weapons, then put the shields back up to defend against any incoming missiles. The USSR was no longer a nuclear threat nor even a nuclear power as soon as the HAARP system was built. Bye, Bye USSR.

9. Where the HAARP Shield Fails

Unfortunately, the HAARP system is not exactly like the shields on the Enterprise. The shield follows along the lines of the earth's magnetic field. Near the north and south poles the magnetosphere reaches down to almost touch the atmosphere. But near the equator the magnetosphere is several thousand miles out in space.

A missile from Russia going over the polar region must pass through the magnetosphere. But a missile from China can deploy a second stage, reach orbit and deploy for re-entry all below an altitude of several hundred miles and never come anywhere near the magnetosphere. Thus HAARP is no defense against Chinese nuclear weapons. A new technology is needed. And it was found.

10. New Methods for the HAARP Shield

About 1995 a number of ionospheric research physicists studying particles coming from the sun, noticed the height of the particles above the earth's surface bouncing back and forth from pole to pole was dependent on their velocity. By slowing the particles down the racing electrons and protons in the magnetosphere would drop down from several thousand miles to almost the top of the atmosphere about 20 to 50 miles above the surface. Could HAARP be used to make that happen? Yes. By changing the frequency at which ions race "around the track" above HAARP just before they are shot out into space, you can determine the height at which they travel.

11. The Pulse Graph Shows New HAARP Technology

Simply by changing the frequency of the circular polarization during the HAARP pulse a vertical curtain of extremely fast particles can be made to drop down from the magnetosphere to just above the top of the atmosphere along the direction which the HAARP signal is sent. In the graph of fig.1 the sloping lines of the green/yellow color are caused by the base frequency of 0.9 to 1 Hz being shifted slightly during the pulse.

What is seen in the graph is the higher frequency harmonics of the square wave pulses which heat the ions but it is the ULF component which fires them into space. And it is the slow shifting of the ULF component during the pulse which produces the vertical curtain shield. I have seen and heard many pulses with the sound seeming to be falling. In this sample the sound is slightly rising. Sounding something like the rising roar of a jet engine during take-off.

12. What Else You Can Learn About HAARP

Well, that is a thumbnail sketch of what you can discover by looking at the graph and listening to the sound of the HAARP transmitter. Of course, none of this is part of the "official" story you can get by rummaging through the web pages at the "official" HAARP website . You might learn about the number of university programs which are performing research on the ionosphere. But even in the "cover story" of ionospheric research, they hardly mention the study of Alfven Waves at the ultra low frequency (ULF) of 0.9 Hz. HAARP is supposed to be an HF or High-Frequency facility.

They do mention some of the students are doing studies on ELF (Extremely Low Frequency) waves. But the only way you might find out HAARP is primarily a ULF facility, despite its name, is by looking at the technical specifications of the instrumentation. Especially, the Induction Magnetometer instrument which was made and tuned for HAARP to detect the pc1 Alfven waves in the magnetic field with a ULF frequency of 0.9 Hz.

You can find out about the Navy's ELF Systems for communicating to nuclear submarines from antennas in Wisconsin and Michigan operating at 76 Hz. You will find nothing about how the US Navy has been using HAARP's ULF signal to transmit much deeper in the ocean. Other countries can communicate to deep subs with transmitters and antennas which can go down to about 7 Hz. But HAARP operates at about 1 Hz. The lower the frequency the deeper the signal penetrates the ocean. To find out about the Navy's "Official" explanation of what they are doing at HAARP, check out the Navy HAARP Fact Sheet .

At the HAARP website you might learn the third member of the triumvirate which operates the facility is the US Air Force. And that's about all you learn. Nothing is said about any Air Force activity at HAARP. Until you read this article you would never have guessed, the part of the Air Force which operates the HAARP facility is the Space Vehicles Directorate , whose primary task is planning and engaging in space warfare. Check out the "Official" Space Vehicles Directorate AF HAARP Fact Sheet to see what they want you to know. Now, why would the Space Vehicles Directorate be interested in playing with some radios in Alaska? Doh. Well, now you know.

To find out about the primary purpose of HAARP you can take a look at the patent filed by Dr. Eastlund in 1985. The patent is filled with a lot of those strange "chicken scratchings" of higher calculus used by plasma physicists and theoretical radio scientists. Just ignore those. Thats only the stuff you put in patents to fool the patent inspectors into thinking you know what you're talking about before you actually build a device to prove you are right. But the patent does have some nice pictures of how the "corkscrewing" waves from the transmitter interact with the ions in the ionosphere to shoot them out into space. Along with the patent bibliography there is a clear description of how a "HAARP" type device can be used. Taken together they give a rather dry, but chilling description of the future of warfare in space.

If you have trouble downloading the images of the Eastlund Patent from either the US Pat Office or the IBM womplex websites, I have made a copy of the text version without the pictures. There are two items which you will see of prime importance; (1) the patent has been assigned to APTI Inc, (APTI is a small subdivision of oil company ARCO, the prime defense contractor which built HAARP) and (2) the Patent Office Classifications for the Eastlund patent are 89/1.11 and 376/100-123. And what do those classifications mean? Here's what the US Pat Off says about those Classifications. (Note: I added the emphasis so you can easily see what is meant)

Class 089

ORDNANCE

Class Definition:

This class includes all guns adapted to be mounted or supported otherwise than by hand, all explosion-operated guns including hand and shoulder firearms, bomb dropping devices, and those gun combinations and subcombinations which are not provided for in other classes including mounts, supports, carriages, loading and hoisting mechanisms, shields.

Subclass: 1.11

WAGING WAR: This subclass is indented under the class definition. Subject matter relating to conducting wars between nations and states, to tactics employed by a military, police, or like unit, or individual to the detriment of an adversary.

Class 376

INDUCED NUCLEAR REACTIONS: PROCESSES, SYSTEMS, AND ELEMENTS

Class Definition:

This class provides for patents directed to processes involving induced nuclear reactions and structures which implement such processes.

376 subclass 100

NUCLEAR FUSION: This subclass is indented under the class definition. Subject matter comprising structures and processes in which two reacting nuclei are combined to yield at least one nucleus having a greater mass than either of the reacting nuclei.

376 Subclass 123

Principal heating by wave energy: This subclass is indented under subclass 121. Subject matter wherein most of the energy imparted to the nuclei for bringing the nuclei to a condition sufficient for reaction to take place is imparted through electromagnetic energy.

The title of Eastlund's Patent is "Method for producing a shell of relativistic particles at an altitude above the earths surface." You can see for yourself the Assignee and the Classifications right on the first page of the text version of Eastlund's Patent . And in addition, you should look at the "CLAIMS" section and read claim "7. The method of claim 6 wherein said shell is formed as an anti-missile shield."

Also at the very end of the patent in the section called "BEST MODES FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION" you will read "It can be seen from the above, that by generating a shell 20 of high density, relativistic particle plasma, an effective defensive shield can be provided to guard against offensive missiles. And that should clarify the purpose of the patent, and thus the purpose and mission of HAARP.

So what does all that mean? Well, HAARP itself is a radio transmitter system which heats a small portion of the ionosphere above the facility and does not directly produce nuclear reactions. The circularly polarized radio waves or "electromagnetic radiation" do cause "cyclotron" reactions in the ionsosphere to toss the ions into the magnetic bottle of the magnetosphere. All those fast ions trapped in the magnetosphere then act as a "shield" used by the "military" to cause the incoming missiles to go Boom! And that is the "induced nuclear reactions" indicated by the patent classification. So much for HAARP just being a government facility for doing research on the aurora. And what else does HAARP do? Well that's for a future coming article.

And if you want the real lowdown info on what "those guys" are really doing up there at HAARP, then you can take a look at my previous article The Unauthorized History of HAARP . And you may say, "Hey waits a minute. Isn't all this stuff yer sayin Top Secret? I mean the Navy and Air Force don't want all them Russians and Chinese to find out what they'er doin. And aint them Chinese gonna be reely upset when they finds out all theys nukaler missiles is just been made obsolete???" Well, yeah. But I'll tell ya what. I'll make you a deal.... (standing and raising right hand and looking all solemn and such) ... I promise ... if you don't tell anybody, I won't either.

Op dinsdag 3 oktober 2006 17:25 schreef Wombcat het volgende:

[..]

Weer be�nvloeden ligt nogal gecompliceerd, omdat we het nu nog niet eens met een behoorlijke nauwkeurigheid kunnen voorspellen. Het zal niet de eerste keer zijn dat militairen iets onderzoeken wat vervolgens volstrekt niet blijkt te kunnen. Maar ik ben met je eens dat je met je poten van het weer af moet blijven. Sowieso is het nooit slim om in complexe systemen factoren te gaan wijzigen, omdat je moeilijk kunt overzien wat de gevolgen zijn.
[..]

Op donderdag 30 november 2006 21:35 schreef DemonRage het volgende:
H.A.A.R.P. lijkt mij het vervolg op het project waar Nikola Tesla met z'n Wardenclyffe Tower mee bezig was... en dan niet het gedeelte "free energy for everyone".

Op vrijdag 1 december 2006 12:00 schreef merlin693 het volgende:
U gaat voor de koelkast

Techniek is in essentie neutraal en ligt het gevaar uiteraard bij de mensen die het beheersen.

Op woensdag 27 december 2006 02:47 schreef FuMiCo08 het volgende:

HAARP is momenteel wel de sterke radio antenna met binnenkort 3,6 gigaWatt zendkracht en dat maakt mensen bang.

Op dinsdag 29 mei 2007 14:55 schreef Moondreamer het volgende:
Als dit in Nederland zou gebeuren, nou........................????????????

Op vrijdag 1 juni 2007 23:30 schreef Moondreamer het volgende:
HAARP + Chemtrails = Elektronisch schild !

Doel : MIND CONTROL !

It's Simple

Op vrijdag 1 juni 2007 23:52 schreef ChOas het volgende:
Leg het, als het zo simpel is, eens uit dan aan de mensen die wel natuurkunde en biologie hebben gestudeerd.

BEARDEN:

On Jan. 28, 1986 the Challenger disaster occurred. The Challenger was positively killed by the Soviet Union, using the scalar EM weapons through the Woodpecker grid. A host of indicators occurred.

The anomalous cold weather in Florida was definitely engineered by the USSR,
http://www.prahlad.org/pub/bearden/Challenger.htm
http://www.cheniere.org/books/analysis/history.htm

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2007 08:36 schreef Resonancer het volgende:

[..]

Lees de link 's.
i.m.o gaat het mbt mindcontrol om veel meer dan Haarp alleen.

[..]

Oh ja en over dat studeren, Tom Bearden weet ook wel wat van natuurkunde.
[..]

Dr Andrija Puharich in the 50's/60's, found that clairvoyant's brainwaves became 8 Hz when their psychic powers were operative.

Op zaterdag 2 juni 2007 09:17 schreef ChOas het volgende:

[..]

Ik heb die link eens doorgekeken. maar er staat niets, maar dan ook NIETS in wat wetenschappelijk onderbouwd wordt.

As we shall see, Tesla was right and all the present scientists and textbooks are wrong .
http://www.cheniere.org/books/part4/index.html

Op maandag 4 juni 2007 11:05 schreef JohnDope het volgende:
Ok ze kunnen het weer manipuleren, maar je moet het niet zien als iets van de NWO. Ze schijnen bijvoorbeeld ook met lasers te hebben geschoten op terroristen in irak. De ledenmaten schenen er af te vallen, zonder dat men geluid hoorde of lichtflitsen zag.

Did a laser beam weapon cause the collapse of the World Trade Center? A physicist who worked on the original infrared beam weapon has reason to believe so.
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/bollyn1.htm

Op maandag 4 juni 2007 11:05 schreef JohnDope het volgende:
Het zal me niks verbazen als die hele NWO conspiracy bedacht is door de linkse kerk.

Op dinsdag 26 juni 2007 23:45 schreef Moondreamer het volgende:
Dus de aarde wordt op een "humanitaire" manier opgewarmd met behulp van HAARP.

De Illumainatie moet zich toch op een of andere manier aan het draaiboek houden !

Jezus Christus, dit is toch niet te geloven !

Op woensdag 27 juni 2007 18:27 schreef pietje77 het volgende:
Of zoals Jezus zelf zei: "Nothing that is hidden shall remain hidden".

Op woensdag 27 juni 2007 21:31 schreef Arcee het volgende:

[..]

Wanneer komt God dan eens tevoorschijn?

Op donderdag 28 juni 2007 08:44 schreef Moondreamer het volgende:

[..]

Tjonge, dit is weer typisch zo'n "I don't know what to do with myself" antwoordt.
Hoe had jij je dat voor gesteld, dat ie morgen bij jouw voor de deur staat ?
Maar daar gaat het nu niet over, want als ik dat aan jouw moest uitleggen, zou je slapeloze nachten hebben !

Op donderdag 28 juni 2007 11:23 schreef CoolGuy het volgende:

[..]

Oh want jij weet wel hoe God zich gaat manifesteren? Leg het voor de aardigheid eens wel uit, kijken of IK daar wel of niet wakker van lig. Ik geloof namelijk niet in God.

Op donderdag 28 juni 2007 15:43 schreef Moondreamer het volgende:

[..]

Als GOD niet zou bestaan, zou jij ook niet bestaan en ik ook niet !

Op donderdag 28 juni 2007 15:52 schreef ChOas het volgende:

[..]

WTF is dat nou weer voor iets ?

Waarom zou ik aannemen dat er ook maar 'een' God of iets wat daarvoor door moet gaan zou bestaan ?

"Ik besta, dus er is een God"

*ponder*

Nee, doet het niet voor mij....

Dit soort dingen horen trouwens meer in WFL thuis dan in een topic over H.A.A.R.P, niet ?

Op donderdag 28 juni 2007 16:25 schreef Moondreamer het volgende:
HAARP SUCKS.........Thank you !

Informative video on HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Reasearch Program)the new weather modification and mind control Star Wars Defense Initiative (SDI)weapon of the US military. HAARP is capable of creating weather like hurricanes and tornadoes and tsunamis and earthquakes. It is also capable of altering peoples moods. From WETA TV a PBS station. Run a Google.com search for HAARP.
een classroom video

Wat is HAARP nu eigenlijk

Met de gevolgen van de tsunami op het netvlies, denkt menig waarheidsonderzoeker automatisch aan het Amerikaanse project voor klimatolgische oorlogsvoering HAARP in Alaska.

Volgens het Pentagon een onschuldig wetenschappelijk onderzoekscentrum maar volgens vele deskundigen is dit Amerika�s geheime wapen die de Nieuwe Wereldorde met rasse schreden dichterbij moet brengen. Sommigen sluiten niet uit dat HAARP de tsunami in de Indische Oceaan heeft veroorzaakt.

De tsunami die elf landen in twee werelddelen trof, geschiedde precies, zelfs op dezelfde tijd, een jaar na de aardbeving in de Iraanse heilige stad, Bam. Op tweede kerstdag 2003 joeg een trillend aardoppervlak zo�n 50 duizend Irani�rs in de dood. Op de vraag of deze toch opvallende synchroniciteit een aanwijzing is dat de Aziatische Oceaanbeving eventueel een duivelse symbooliek kent en mede daardoor door HAARP zou zijn veroorzaakt, doet de hersencellen van een seismografisch medewerker van het KNMI even hevig trillen. "Harp, zei u, dat is toch een muziekinstrument?" stamelt Torild van Eck.

Als na enig uitleg de verontwaardiging is weggetrokken en hij op het bestaan en de mogelijke kracht van dit klimatologisch wapen wordt gewezen, zegt de seismograaf "daarvan geen enkel bewijs te kennen." Ook persvoorlichtster Clarisse Buma van Wereld Natuur Fonds heeft nog nooit van High Frequency Active Auroral Resaerch Program (HAARP) gehoord, de zoekmachine van hun website krijgt bij HAARP geen enkel zoekresultaat. Annemarie van Hees van Greenpeace Nederland wist, na enige uitleg, ineens weer van het bestaan af. "Maar we focussen ons op echte grote milieuzaken."

Dat is te begrijpen. Maar het zou de milieuridders van weleer sieren dit Amerikaanse project eens flink onder de loep te nemen. De recente toename van natuurrampen schrijven internationale onderzoekers namelijk niet alleen toe aan het broeikaseffect, maar ook aan de manipulatie van het klimaat door het Amerikaanse leger. Volgens hen speelt het HAARP-observatorium in de nabijheid van Gakono in Alaska in deze geheime oorlog een sleutelrol. Het wapen dat vanaf 1992 uitgroeide naar een antennewoud van 180 antennes met hoog frequentie transmitters, is pas de laatste jaren echt voluit gaan functioneren.

Het project, voortgekomen uit SDI, Stategic Defense Initiative, bekend als het Star Wars-programma van oud-president Ronald Reagan, wordt in staat geacht �op lokaal niveau modificaties van de ionosfeer, de bovenste laag van de atmosfeer, te controleren�. In het kort functioneert HAARP als een ultra-technisch laserbeamer die alles wat dood of levend is kan penetreren. Greenpeace en het Wereld Natuur Fonds moeten eens op HAARP google-en.

Ze worden dan overspoeld met alarmerende uitspraken en essays van talloze, vooral Amerikaanse en Canadese wetenschappers. Volgens de Canadese Dr. Rosalie Bertell, directrice van het International Perspective in Public Health en milieu-pionier van het eerste uur, is HAARP onderdeel van een geintegreerd klimatologisch wapensysteem dat "een vernietigende kracht kan genereren die vergelijkbaar is met een atoombom." Richard Williams, een natuurkundige van het David Sarnoff laboratorium in Princeton (VS), vat de activiteiten rondom HAARP samen als �een onverantwoordelijke daad van globaal vandalisme�.

Het wapen werd al in 1970 aangekondigd door de Amerikaanse defensiestrategist Zbigniew Brezinski. In zijn boek �Between two ages� schrijft de oud-nationale veiligheidsadviseur van president Jimmy Carter: "Technologie maakt het mogelijk dat leiders van belangrijke naties kunnen beschikken over geheime wapens die de weeromstandigheden langdurig en op grote schaal kunnen modificeren."

E-SYSTEMS
Bij de HAARP-constructie was ondermeer het Amerikaanse E-Systems betrokken, een hich tech-militaire industrie gespecialiseerd in hoogwaardige spionage technologie. Op jaarbasis verkopen ze doorgaans voor 1,8 miljard dollar aan de Amerikaanse defensie, bijna de helft daarvan is bestemd voor militaire doelen waarover het Amerikaanse congres niet wordt ingelicht.

Hoewel HAARP aan het publiek wordt verkocht als een wetenschappelijk onderzoeksproject laat de omschrijving van het patentrecht van J. Eastlund aan duidelijkheid niets te wensen over: "Methode en apparatuur om regionaal de atmosfeer, de ionosfeer en/of de machtssfeer te veranderen."

Hetzelfde geldt voor de omschrijving van een cursus die Phillips Geophysics Lab, volgens Michel Chossudovsky, professor Economie aan de universiteit van Ottawa (Canada) een partner in het HAARP-project. De training is bestemd voor het militaire personeel in de Hanscom Luchtmacht-basis in Maryland.

Het gaat over Weermodificatie technieken die voor het bereiken van militaire doelen stormen, orkanen en aarbevingen uitlokken. Verder onderstrepen militaire documenten de intentie om de ionosfeer voor defensie-doelen te gebruiken.

Studies van de Amerikaanse luchtmacht wijzen op de macht om naast het regiseren van weerpatronen regionale electriciteits- en communicatiesystemen plat te leggen waardoor de VS uiteindelijk hele delen van de wereld kan ontregelen. Sciencefiction?

THE PROPHECY CLUB
Ineens schiet me de wereldkaart te binnen die de Amerikaanse profetie-deskundige,
Norm Franz, toonde tijdens een presentatie bij the Prohecy Club in de Amerikaanse Bijbelbelt.

De pastor liet zien dat Illuminati-clubs als de Bilderberg Groep en de Club van Rome de wereld in tien economische delen hadden opgedeeld. Deel 9 stond tot mijn verbazing letterlijk precies voor dat gebied dat op tweede kerstdag zo verraderlijk werd overspoeld:

Het Aziatische gedeelte van de Indische Oceaan wiens geografische kaart dagenlang de voorpagina�s van de dagbladen vulde.

Als HAARP inderdaad de bron achter dit kwaad was geweest, ligt het motief voor het oprapen. Maleisi�, Thailand, India en Indonesi� waren namelijk de laatste decennia bezig met een groteske economische inhaalrace. Vooral op het gebied van toerisme kampten het gebied met groeistuipen. De oceaanbeving wierp ze echter decennia terug. Het zal jaren duren en miljarden dollars kosten om de schade te herstellen.

De wederopbouw komt andere economische gebieden uiteraard goed van pas, zeker de landen die het meest van de Aziatische economische expansie had te vrezen: Europa en Amerika. "Daarbij," zo vervolgt complotgoeroe van eigen bodem, Anton Teuben van de website www.Niburu.nl in het Groningse Bedem, "speelt dit de regisseurs van de Nieuwe Wereld Orde precies in de kaart. De wereld slaat na de ramp de handen massaal in elkaar. Op mondiale schaal kwam direct een kolossale hulpactie op gang die uiteindelijk zal resulteren in een grote propaganda om de problemen van vandaag op wereldniveau aan te pakken. Volkomen begrijpelijk natuurlijk,
welk normaal mens kan zoveel leed aanzien.

Maar helaas is de massa er niet voldoende van doordrongen dat de ramp en de wereldwijde humane reactie daarop, net als de oorlog tegen het terrorisme, slechts onderdeel zijn van een groot plan die uiteindelijk moet leiden tot een Nieuwe Wereld Orde. Tot een grote robotachtige- slavenmaatschappij waarin een kleine groep dictators via een strakke pyramide-machtstructuur de lakens uitdeelt." Ziet Teuben sterretjes?

Waarheidzoekers brengen sinds het functioneren van HAARP ook natuurrampen in relatie met de eeuwenlange mondiale operatie die uiteindelijk moet leiden tot de Nieuwe Wereld-orde. De realisatie daarvan is voor de blank, protestante superrijke elite in en rondom het Witte Huis het sacrale doel. Bush en consorten laven zich aan een wereldbeeld waarbij hun WASP-klasse de wereld domineert. Het is hun �Jihad� om de behoefte aan een Nieuwe Wereldorde tot ongekende hoogten op te zwepen. "

De beste weg daartoe is het cre�ren van chaos, de wereld brengen in een permanente staat van verwarring zodat alle volkeren letterlijk gaan smachten naar een allesomvattende oplossing. Ze bereiken dat onder meer door via hun geheime diensten landen, volkeren, stammen, families, regeringen, klassen, organisaties en zelfs beroepen tegen elkaar op te zetten.

Uiteindelijk moet de behoefte naar een definitieve en vooral grootschalige oplossing zo immens zijn dat de Nieuwe Wereldorde door de VS wereldwijd nagenoeg vrijwillig wordt ingevoerd," aldus David Icke, Brits samenzweringsdeskundige en auteur van onder meer "And the truth will set you free...�. Icke acht een HAARP-interventie in het ontstaan van de Aziatische vloedgolf zeer wel mogelijk.

SCHURKENSTATEN
Hoewel HAARP volgens verschillende bronnen pas in 2006 optimaal zal functioneren, bestaan er genoeg aanwijzingen dat de VS zijn wapen al regelmatig tegen de schurkenstaten en de landen van het As van het Kwaad heeft ingezet. Irak, Iran, Syri�, Afghanistan, Noord Korea en Cuba zijn de afgelopen jaren veelvuldig slachtoffer geweest van natuurrampen met een omvang die deze landen zelden of nooit eerder meemaakten.

De opgelopen schade staat bovendien vaak niet in verhouding met de schade die andere landen vanwege de opwarming van de aarde oplopen. Zowel in Cuba als in Noord Korea voltrokken zich in het laatste decennium immense droogtes, gevolgd door overstromingen die nagenoeg de hele landbouw vernietigden. In Noord Korea vinden zich vanaf 1995 jaarlijks zware overstromingen plaats.

Volgens Pyongyang stierven er door de daaruit voortvloeiende hongersnoden 220 duizend Noord-Koreanen, westerse bronnen spreken echter over twee miljoen slachtoffers. Volgens Autoriteiten in de provincie van Kangwon, die spraken met de BBC, was de hoeveelheid regen in oktober 1999 in twaalf uur tijd soms twintig maal zoveel dan gedurende de gehele oktobermaand in voorgaande jaren. De overstroming in dat jaar was vele malen erger dan de zwaarste overstroming in 1910. In het oosten van Cuba viel in 1998 evenveel regen als in 1941, het droogste geregistreerde jaar.

Volgens de UN kampen ruim een half miljoen Cubanen direct met de gevolgen van de droogte.
Dit alles leidt tot een jaarlijks verlies van de suikerplantages van ruim tien procent, een verlies van 42 procent in de vijf oostelijke provincies van groenten, bonen, bananen en rijst en levend voedsel. In mei/juni vorig jaar voltrok zich de zwaarste droogtes in de laatste 40 jaar. Vier miljoen mensen tellen elke druppel water die ze kunnen vinden. Waterbronnen drogen op.

De steden zitten zonder water. �De droogte krijgt Cuba op zijn knie�n�, kopten Cubaanse kranten in Miami. Negatieve droogterecords worden ook gebroken in Irak, Iran, Oezbekistan en Pakistan. Het waterpeil in de grond daalt jaarlijks met tien centimeter, waterbronnen drogen op, het vee sterft uit. Voorspellingen spreken over een alsmaar warmer wordend klimaat. Dan te bedenken dat het in
deze landen nu al vaak warmer is dan 40 graden.

NIBURU
Komt dat allemaal door het broeikaseffect? Of krijgen deze schurkenstaten inderdaad een voorkeursbehandeling van de klimatologische oorloggeneraals?

Anton Teuben sprak talloze kamerleden over HAARP aan, maar het gros had er nog nooit van gehoord en hadden andere zaken aan hun hoofd. Terwijl de Russische Doema al in 2002 wees op het bestaan van de HAARP-lokatie in Alaska en op de mogelijke bouw van twee gelijksoortige locaties in respectievelijk Groenland en Noorwegen.

Ze benadrukten dat de eerste grootschalige testen in 2003 zouden worden uitgevoerd. De Doema reageerde unaniem met het volgende statement: "De Verenigde Staten testen zonder controle van de wereldgemeenschap klimatolgische wapens uit die alle mogelijke communicatielijnen kunnen plat leggen, die zware ongelukken kunnen veroorzaken in electriciteitsnetwerken, olie- en gaspijplijnen en bovendien een negatief effect kunnen hebben op de mentale gezondheid van alle burgers.

Mochten deze afschuwelijke horror-verhalen inderdaad op waarheid berusten, dan verdient Amerika het om nationaal en internationaal aangepakt te worden." Elke normaal mens sluit zich daar uiteraard bij aan.
bron

HEATER-INDUCED ARTIFICIAL AIRGLOW
OBSERVATIONS FROM A RECENT CAMPAIGN AT
THE HAARP FACILITY
E. Gerken
STAR Laboratory, Stanford University [egerken@stanford.edu]
An artificial airglow campaign was conducted from January 31 to February 19, 2002
at the High Frequency Active Auroral Program (HAARP) in Gakona AK (62.39N,
145.15W). 630nm and/or 557.7nm artificial airglow was observed on thirteen nights
during the campaign. The campaign was a collaborative effort with participating in-
struments from a number of institutions. Three cameras were located at the HAARP
facility: an all-sky imager, a 60 degree field of view camera, and a telescopic imager
(˜1 degree field of view). Two cameras were located off-site for side view imaging–
one at Poker Flat Research Station, and the other alternating between Nenana AK and
HIPAS. An SEE receiver was operated in Gakona and the Kodiak SuperDARN radar
was run in a dedicated mode for part of the campaign. In addition data was gathered
throughout the campaign by the HAARP diagnostic instruments including a riometer,
magnetometer, digisonde, ELF receiver, and TEC tomographic system. Several pre-
liminary results have emerged from observations during the campaign. Bright 630nm
(several hundred Rayleighs) and 557.7nm (over 50R) airglow were observed simul-
taneously during F-layer heating. A dramatic enhancement in airglow brightness was
observed when the HAARP heater beam was aimed along the magnetic field lines (15
degrees from vertical). Both structured and non-structured airglow was observed at
630nm and 557.7nm. Patchy 557.7nm airglow was observed to drift through the heated
region. The airglow region was displaced within the calculated 3dB heater beam. Al-
titude calculations were performed from sideview triangulations at HIPAS and Poker
Flat. Sideview imaging revealed that structure observed in the airglow region was
field-aligned. The airglow spot size did not vary at the same rate as the beamwidth
at heater frequencies of 7.8MHz to 3.3MHz. Artificial airglow was observed during
periods of spread-F. Data from the various participating instruments illustrating these
results will be presented.
bron

Cyprus: recent reports on "weird" weather engineering
I've been sent these first hand accounts from Cyprus and I offered to send them along to you for wider distribution. Dreadful to be subjected to such weather manipulations.

Best, Imelda, Cork

Excerpted accounts I have received:

Monday 23 April, 2007

Here the weather engineering is disgraceful. Whenever they want, they change the blue Cyprus sky into a sand-filled grey mass of dust - everything is grey and weirdly silent. It made me feel very weird and panicky yesterday afternoon, also depressed. then earth tremors at 6.30 pm . . . Then we couldn't sleep because of hot/cold - humidity. Even ordinary people are talking about it. . .

Tuesday, 8 May, 2007

. . . This morning I arrived in Limassol to find the sea road cloaked in deep fog??? Ships sounding foghorns. Not a Cypriot thing. I wonder whose communications required fog today? . . .

Wednesday, 9 May, 2007 . . . when they've finished with the thick dust screens, they have to be removed. A rain shower or a wind is used to move it. Maybe they had a trainee working yesterday because we were awakened by a GALE. In Cyprus? In May? The trees in our garden are full of baby birds and they are unlikely to have survived. Cypress trees bent double.

Then this morning a helicopter over my house . . . as the copter passed over (from Akrotiri to . . . Troodos) my left (bad) ear was stabbed by an electronic pain.

. . . yesterday lunchtime, there was a large military ship just offshore with all its electronic equipment burling round. I mean, you don't need that to navigate off the Limassol shore - people do it on inflatable bananas, as you know. And it was in exactly the same spot as when I saw one doing the same thing a few months ago with the same weather abuse.

FRIDAY, 11 MAY, 2007 . . . I am almost in tears at the weather abuse we are being subjected to. Whoever is at the controls is a madman. We have had the grey dust shroud daily, like a solar eclipse. Then gales for short periods. This morning dark with lightning storms. Just now things suddenly went black. Giant hail stones the size of large peas are battering the window, and big V-shape of migrating large birds approaching Akrotiri tried to turn around but have probably been battered to death.

. . . Everybody is talking about it but don't understand it's deliberate. . . If you look on euronews you see that the area targeted with weather abuse is precisely the theatre of war.

The cherry crop will have been destroyed, not to mention the fledgling birds. The olive blossoms destroyed and thus the olive crop. This is rampaging vandalism on a regional scale.

Very despondent as I feel so powerless.

Related info. I googled "cloud seeding Cyprus" for the following:

http://www.blackraiser.com/

Harpooning the HAARP Twilight Polarization Reveals Invisible HAARP Radiation Report by Peter Kapnist - Photos by Kara Pietrina
10-27-5

Cyprus HAARP Radiation Revealed By Peter Kapnist October 27, 2005

We were sailing to the isle of the Apocalypse. Patmos is that small Greek island of the Mediterranean Sea where almost two thousand years ago in a misty cave, St John envisioned the Revelation of Jesus Christ - the last book of the Bible.

I had arrived by sea with two friends of mine, Vranas, an expert mural painter and his wife, Kara, to explore some radioactive springs beyond the "Furnace Islands Archipelago" just north of Patmos and a smaller islet known as Fourni. An unforeseen series of events suddenly changed our travel plans but allowed us to actually photograph the "glow" or radial signature of what appeared to be a real-time HAARP broadcast from the British military base in Cyprus.

Below are some chronological details of our account and a brief description of the so-called British military HAARP device in Southern Cyprus: Monday, 17 October 2005 - An earthquake measuring around magnitude 6.0 rocked Greece's eastern Aegean islands at about 05:45 GMT, but no injuries or serious damage were reported. The epicentre was a short distance from where we were. On the same day, bird flu was reported in the same area of Greece. The country's agriculture ministry said a form of the bird flu virus had been found on a farm on the Aegean Sea, just a short nautical distance from where we were staying. Thursday, 20 October 2005 - Another earthquake measuring 6.0 on the Richter scale was recorded approximately 45 minutes after midnight, in the sea of the eastern Aegean islands where we were located, spreading fear and panic. The quake was of the same magnitude and had the same epicentre as the previous tremor recorded on Monday. Friday, 21 October 2005 - Throughout the day we observed and photographed an uninterrupted sequence of aircraft leaving streaky contrails in the sky directly over the earthquake zone. The contrails did not dissipate, but instead grew larger, in criss-cross "Chemtrail" patterns that soon merged together and become hazy, cloudy masses. The unusual flight activity continued non-stop during the entire day. We sometimes observed up to four or five aircraft at a time, moving over the earthquake epicentre while "seeding" contrails that gradually blossomed into amazingly large artificial clouds. At about 18:00 we briefly observed and photographed peculiar lines of light or radii coming up out of the sea from the direction of Cyprus, southeast of Fourni. It is important to note that the sun was at the opposite horizon when our photos were taken. What looked like radiating lines of faint sunlight diverging from the centre of dusk were certainly something else, because the sun was actually setting directly behind us in the west, not even in the general direction of our camera's view. What caused the eerie golden spikes or rays of southeastern light? We can only guess it was electromagnetic radiation, or photosensitive particles reacting to the twilight polarization, from some unnoticed transmitter - natural or otherwise - in the direction of Cyprus. Our photos indicate that the spikes or beams of energy rising from the sea did in fact "bounce" or rebound off the man-made contrail clouds and seemed to return to the earth again, for unexplainable reasons. The radii of light were not visible during the following days, and the aircraft flyover rate returned to the normal eastern Aegean levels.

Aircraft were laying contrails in the sky directly over the Aegean earthquake zone. When the bottom photos were taken, the sun was actually setting directly behind us in the west, not even in the general direction of our camera's view.

Above: Chemtrail "seeding" is visible at top left of frame with eerie rays of light rising from the Aegean Sea. Below: The same image enhanced to detect ray edges.

Above: Weird rays of light rise from the Aegean Sea and "bounce" off man-made Chemtrail clouds visible at top right of frame. Below: The same image enhanced to detect ray edges.

Not real sunrays. Not real clouds.

CHEMTRAIL spraying programs, which apparently are being conducted on a worldwide basis, may have originated as experiments in weather modification by "Cloud Seeding." But as more people take notice, they are questioning the health and psychological effects of whatever it is that's happening in the sky. Concerns are now growing over the disruption of migratory patterns and the spraying of aerosols that could promote the development of pathogens (such as bird flu virus) at high altitudes. After the Asian earthquake tsunami and hurricane Katrina, many feel that weather modification is fast becoming a "Weather War" and the time has finally come to bring the matter to the attention of the public.

HAARP stands for High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project, a joint effort of the U.S. Air Force and the navy at a remote base near Gakona, Alaska. HAARP generates million watt phased pulses, which in turn generate extremely low frequency (ELF) waves for submarine communication and tomography. Its critics have argued that it may also be used as a mind-control/weather-control weapon of mass destruction. The British Army are currently experimenting with an immensely expensive ultra-sophisticated version of HAARP in their large army base at Greek Cyprus. Greek Cypriots have recently rioted outside the British military base in Southern Cyprus, protesting against the use of 190 foot microwave towers by the British Army and NATO to broadcast high-power microwaves. The British have allegedly stated that their pulse modulation program is targeted on Iran and Iraq and that the British version has the ability - like HAARP and a similar system in Norway - "to bounce its millions of Watts of 8MHz transmissions off the ionosphere to control the weather, destroy communication networks, and to violently upset whole populations by inducing ELF behavioural changes, neurological changes, and physical trauma."

"Our photos indicate that the spikes or beams of energy rising from the sea did in fact 'bounce' or rebound off the man-made contrail clouds and seemed to return to the earth again, for unexplainable reasons."

What happened? It seems that the British HAARP device
(powered from the British military base in Cyprus) may have a fatal flaw: Its pulse modulations can actually become "visible" when exposed to certain atmospheric disturbances. It appears that twilight (when the sun is below the horizon) can sometimes restrict the HAARP particle vibrations to one direction (polarization), allowing its broadcast waves to briefly be seen as "faint rays" or radii of reflected light coming up from the direction of Cyprus. (Auroral = luminous phenomenon, usually of streamers of light in the night sky.) Indeed, if even Sunday tourists can sometimes get snapshots of HAARP million watt phased pulses in the twilight plasma, it would be a very serious setback for the British Army. Because computer enhanced photos of HAARP broadcasts could theoretically be analysed by adversaries to reveal discharge direction, wave amplitude, or other complex activity for the purpose of developing powerful interference systems to frustrate and defeat future HAARP applications. Correcting the tell-tale flaw could cost many millions, dangerously waste time, or prove to be impossible.

Who took the heat? Monday, 31 October 2005 - A few days after the above photos were released, a British government official was under pressure to quit over claims he may have broken ministerial rules in connection with a DNA testing firm. The actual particulars are not relevant here, because the covert operational details of HAARP are top secret and will probably never be made public. However, if and when fatal flaws are discovered, it is almost certain that a corresponding ministerial official will be circumstantially censured or even pressured to step down. On the same day, the European Commission said Greek authorities would lift a ban on the movement of poultry from the eastern Aegean region after a second and final set of tests found no presence of the bird flu virus. The unusual flight activity seen over the Aegean earthquake zone may have been part of a demonstration of fourth generation jets, during which Greece formally submitted its order for 30 Lockheed Martin F-16 Block 52+ jets from the U.S. to address air defence needs over the next 15 years. The inspection of 30 new jets for the NATO Aegean corridor may have been more than enough reason to perform a live HAARP test.
bron

Officially, HAARP is a research station directed by the Air Force Research Laboratory's Space Vehicles Directorate in Gokona, Alaska, that opened in 1992 to gather data about the atmosphere and "radio propagation conditions." Their web site (www.haarp.alaska.edu) states that they are monitoring and archiving the naturally occurring variations with the sun's activities such as sunspots and solar flares.

HAARP constitutes a system of powerful antennas capable of creating "controlled local modifications of the ionosphere." However, there seems to be much more going on behind HAARP's public face.

THE IDEA FOR HAARP BASED ON TESLA TECHNOLOGY

HAARP is based on physicist Bernard J. Eastlund's U.S. Patent from 1987 titled "Method and Apparatus for Altering a Region in the Earth's Atmosphere, Ionosphere, and/or Magnetosphere" (US #4,686,605). Eastlund's patent is based, in part, on the works of Nikola Tesla, who first suggested that RF could transmit approximately one watt per cubic centimeter to any point on the planet without the use of wires. Thus, power can generated on the ground and then sent through the air to the upper areas of the atmosphere miles above the surface of the planet.

Eastlund explained in his patent application that by influencing the ionosphere, methods of communication disruption, missile shielding and weather modification are possible. His second patent described the reflection of a second signal, using a previously "heated" ionospheric bulge, to distant locations on the Earth's surface.

Eastlund had been working with the Atlantic Richfield Company, holders of a massive reserve of natural gas under Alaska's North Slope. ARCO bought Eastlund's first two patents with the understanding that this new technology would make it possible for their natural gas reserves, too expensive to be piped from Alaska, to be converted to electrical energy on the north slope, and then bounced off the heated ionosphere to customers in remote locations around the globe.

Because Eastlund's "heaters" could elevate the Earth's ionosphere, his discovery provided the ability to control weather by altering upper atmosphere wind patterns. This is done by focusing high frequency radio transmissions on the ionosphere, lifting and heating it in localized areas which then alters wind patterns and ultimately weather conditions.

Unfortunately, the military had purchased Eastlund's two patents from ARCO and had given them to Raytheon, a military contractor. So there would be no civilian use for this new technology.

WHAT HAARP COULD BE USED FOR

Today, HAARP has 48 antennas that can broadcast up to 960 kW of power, and plans to expand to 180 antennas and 3.6 megawatts of power by 2006. Even that is short of the thousands of antennas and hundreds of megawatts of power that Eastlund figures would be needed to control the weather or act as an effective missile shield. However, even at 3.6 megawatts, significant weather control experiments could be performed.

In fact, radio operators who routinely monitor HAARP transmissions have noted an increase in RF output from the station right before hurricanes Katrina and Rita grew into dangerous storms. Though there is no proof that the ferocity of these recent hurricanes are the result of climatic tampering by the HAARP administration, Phillips Geophysics Lab, which is a partner in the HAARP project, contemplates the triggering of storms and hurricanes for military use in a course for military personnel at MD's Hanscom Air Force Base, on weather modification techniques.

Even if the HAARP program is experimenting with weather control, ground-based weather control could soon be surpassed by theoretical solar powered satellite-based systems with a possible power output of 1,000 megawatts. NASA, and the European Space Agency has been researching the possibility of such satellites being used as an energy source, transmitting power to Earth with concentrated beams of microwaves. With a fleet of these powerful satellites using the same RF principals used by HAARP, it is conceivable that the weather over any geographic location could be modified at will.

THE ALASKAN DEATH RAY

It has been alleged that the HAARP facility, located near Gokona, Alaska, is not the "real" HAARP project, and that the actual HAARP is conducting experiments that seem beyond the realm of possibility. Writer Dan Eden, of the Viewzone website, recently revealed that in 1998 he was shown a secret HAARP facility near Fairbanks, Alaska.

Eden was invited to come to Alaska by two men, Dave and Jonas, who had been recently discharged from the Navy. Eden was taken by his hosts to a small Alaskan town called Fox. From there they took snowmobiles east along the Chatinaka River where they encountered military "Restricted Area" signs. From the vantage point on top of a ridge, Eden was shown an enormous area below them that was covered with rows and rows of metal poles - antennae and small silver rectangular sheds where black cables originated. The entire area was at least a mile square and the number of antennae must have been in the thousands.

Eden was told that this was a phased array, and that this was a type of antenna where the signal being sent out could be focused to a very narrow beam - like a laser - and that it was capable of emitting a signal that was billions of watts in power.

At one point Eden questioned why an antenna system would be buried between such high ridges. "Wouldn't that interfere with the signal?"

"Not if you're sending it straight up," he was told. They explained that this energy was used to heat a layer of the atmosphere, to cause it to bend and thicken, and that it would then be ready for the "death ray."

Eastlund's discovery had been taken by the military during the cold war era because it allowed microwave signals to be sent and received beyond the horizon. This fact alone allowed them to prevent its development in any humane or commercial application since it would then be available to enemy nations. But once the heater had created a sort of lens in the ionosphere, you did not have to limit your signal to radar or microwaves. Eastlund had developed the ability to send massive bursts of power - in the billions of watts range - and these could now be zapped to just about any point of the Earth.

"HAARP in Gakona, about 300 miles south of here, that's a fake decoy for the public. Everyone knows about that," Dave told Eden. "They even have a web site with one of those instant cam things and a few dozen antennae. That's just a thing for show so they can say that it's all harmless and open."
The two men explained that they had worked at the secret HAARP, Dave was in the 'com'- the command center of the heater. He worked with the primary transmitter or generator. Jonas said that he mainly worked on the feeder lines on the antenna farm. The two were both there when they "bumped the power up to the max and let it blow," from thousands of watts to billions.

"They never used that much power before so they just did it to see what would happen," Jonas said. "And when they did it kind of multiplied the power and then a huge chunk of Earth's atmosphere blew away, out into space.

Jonas pulled another graph from the box.

"Here. Look at the ultraviolet and radiation the came through right after they did it. They blew away the shield and all the radiation just came right down and zapped Earth. And look. It lasted for a long time!"

Eden asked if anyone had been hurt by these tests. The answer chilled him to his bones.

"Shit, yes. Here in Alaska there were Eskimos that were all fried and like whole herds of antelopes. But the holes also moved west and did their real harm in Siberia. But it isn't just the people it killed. It made these people and animals sick from the radiation that came from the Sun - the stuff that's usually blocked by the atmosphere - and so there have been still births and cancers and mutations. They are trying to keep it all real hushed. It's insane. And the worst part is that they are going to use it again!"

STRANGE WEATHER

Several years later, in 1999, Dan Eden received e-mails from a reader in Serbia, where the UN forces had been fighting Melosovich, mostly with American armed forces and equipment. The e-mails mentioned a strange phenomenon that accompanied attacks by the U.S. A-10, "warthog" fighter jet.
It was reported that, just prior to an air attack, the sky often filled with huge black clouds that would materialized out of nowhere, and stayed until the end of the campaign -- which was usually couple of weeks. However, instead of rain, falling on Belgrade, there were hailstones the size of eggs.

"You can still see the marks it left on houses." During that time witnesses described strange "lighting" in the sky that lasted for hours which didn't look like anything anybody had ever seen before. The "thunder" that accompanied the strange "lightning" was equally strange. It was hundreds of times stronger than any thunder anybody ever remembered. It was so loud that it was even louder then the sound of bomb explosions.

As well, scientists in Serbia released a report that stated that the electromagnetic field over Serbia was punctured. The "hole" was almost the size of Serbia itself and it started at the border, between Kosovo and Albania in the south, and ended near the Yugoslav and Hungarian border in the north.

There are also reports of bizarre weather over Iraq during the U.S. invasion in 2004. It seems obvious that HAARP is being used to manipulate the weather all over the planet. The Washington Post reported that a growing number of physicists and others in the scientific community are becoming increasingly worried.

A "small group of American physicists, some of whom have aired complaints in scientific journals, fear HAARP may not simply be the simple research experiment that advocates describe, but possibly phase one of a secret U.S. military program that could be seeking ways to blow other countries' spacecraft out of the sky or disrupt communications over large portions of the planet."

Richard Williams, a physicist and consultant to the David Sarnoff laboratory in Princeton alleges HAARP constitutes "an irresponsible act of global vandalism." He and others fear a secret second stage where HAARP would "beam much more energy into the ionosphere. That could produce a severe disruption of the upper atmosphere at one location that may produce effects that spread rapidly around the Earth for years."

Documents acquired from the Office of Naval Research via the Freedom Of Information Act reveal a more ominous purpose for HAARP. According to these documents, the U.S. military believes the former Soviet Union has similar heaters with which they claim to have achieved higher levels of ionospheric reaction than possible so far in the "West".

Although smaller in size than the secret HAARP project, there are many other ground based transmitting heaters in operation around the world; Tromso, Norway and Arecibo, Puerto Rico among them.

Michel Chossudovsky, professor of economics at the University of Ottawa and Director of the Center for Research on Globalization, says that: "There are very clear statements by the U.S. Air Force to the effect that weather modification technology is available, HAARP is fully operational and could be used in actually military situations. It is clear that weather warfare does constitute an instrument of the Air Force, they even identify the scenarios of its use."

Can these heaters already be changing the weather, and have they somehow contributed to the recent climate-based catastrophes in the U.S? How many humans have contracted cancers and other sicknesses that might have remained dormant if not triggered by these transmissions?

It is critical that this technology be closely monitored by independent scientific associations (it currently is not), and, if used, needs to be used in such a way as to be beneficial. It could be used to increase food supply, repair the ozone layer or reduce damage to civilian populations frequently affected by adverse weather conditions. Sadly, current military agendas appear not to give much weight to these possible beneficial uses of the technology. It is an instrument that is paid for by tax-payers dollars and is currently not in the hands of people who have earned or deserve our confidence and trust.
bron

Radio-echo's van de maan met HAARP-antennes
Thursday, 10 January 2008
NEW MEXICO - Wetenschappers hebben met de HAARP-array in Alaska krachtige signalen naar de maan gezonden en de echo daarvan succesvol ontvangen.
In het echo experiment werden krachtige radiogolven naar de maan gestuurd met de High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) antennes in Alaska. De volledige kracht van 3,6 MegaWatt werd gebruikt tijdens het experiment. De maan staat 384 duizend kilometer van de aarde.
Op 28 en 29 oktober werden twee uur per dag om de vijf seconden een puls van twee seconden naar de maan gestuurd. Het eerste uur werd een frequentie van 7,4075MHz naar de maan gestuurd, en het tweede uur een frequentie van 9,4075MHz.
Een gedeelte kaatste via de ionosfeer met de volle kracht terug op het aardoppervlak, en een gedeelte ging door naar de maan, waarna het na 2,4 seconden weer op aarde werd gedetecteerd op speciale antennes in de woestijn van New Mexico. De reflecties zijn de laagste die ooit van de maan terugkwamen.
Het experiment diende ervoor om informatie over het suboppervlak van de maan te krijgen, en de interactie van de ionosfeer te bestuderen, omdat de ionosfeer reageert op signalen door de HAARP array
_bron

Lowest Frequency Radar Echo From The Moon Ever Detected

ScienceDaily (Jan. 10, 2008) — A team of scientists from the Naval Research Laboratory, the Air Force Research Laboratory's (AFRL's) Research Vehicles Directorate, Kirtland Air Force Base, N.M., and the University of New Mexico (UNM) has detected the lowest frequency radar echo from the moon ever seen with earth-based receivers

In the lunar echo experiment (more properly called a lunar bistatic radar experiment), the Air Force/Navy High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) high power transmitter, located near Gakona, Alaska, launched high power radio waves toward the moon. The reflected signal, weakened because of the long distance to the moon and back, was detected by receiving antennas in New Mexico.

NRL consultant scientist Dr. Paul Rodriguez, of NRL's Information Technology Division, who conceived and proposed the experiment explains, "Analysis of the echo gives information on the properties of the lunar sub-surface topography, because the low frequency radar waves propagate to varying depths below the visible surface of the moon. It is somewhat like sonar, except that we are using electromagnetic waves rather than sound waves. The experiment also allows us to study the interaction of the echo signal with the earth's ionosphere along its return path, because the ionosphere is only partially transparent at low frequencies."

During the experiment, which was carried out on Oct. 28 and 29, 2007, the radar signals from HAARP were at 7.4075 MHz and 9.4075 MHz. Both the transmitted signal and the echo from the moon were detected by NRL Remote Sensing Division scientist, Dr. Kenneth Stewart, and NRL engineer Brian Hicks with antennas built for the Long Wavelength Array (LWA). LWA is a radio interferometer being built in the desert west of Socorro, N.M., by UNM, NRL, the Applied Research Laboratories at the University of Texas at Austin, Virginia Tech, and Los Alamos National Laboratory, for studies of space physics and astrophysics.

The LWA is intended to work below the 88 MHz edge of the FM band, but to get down to the HAARP signal frequencies, the antennas were equipped with digital receivers and specially designed matching networks developed by Stewart, Hicks, and engineer Nagini Paravastu at NRL. "Detecting the very weak radio signals after their round trip to the moon and back was challenging and required careful modification of the LWA antennas to improve their performance at these frequencies," says Stewart. NRL LWA Project Scientist Dr. Namir Kassim notes, "One of the successful goals of this experiment was to demonstrate that the LWA can work with instruments like HAARP at lower frequencies than its nominal design."

The HAARP radar antenna array was "phased" to point about 45 degrees away from the zenith, in order to track and directly illuminate the moon. Its full total power capability, about 3.6 MW, was used to transmit pulses two seconds in length every five seconds over a period of two hours each day, one hour at each frequency. Using such a pulse pattern makes the echo, which arrives back from the moon 2.4 seconds later, immediately recognizable, allowing the scientists to distinguish the moon's echo signal from the HAARP signal. The HAARP signal reached the receiving antennas in New Mexico by reflecting off the underside of the ionosphere, the region of the Earth's atmosphere from 50 to 400 km in altitude that is partially ionized by solar radiation.

The lunar echo measurements at 7.4075 MHZ are believed to be the lowest frequency (longest wavelength) at which bistatic radar measurements have been conducted. "Even though lunar echoes have been detected before at higher frequencies, it was really exciting to see them arrive in real time out under the full moon in the New Mexico desert," says NRL's Hicks.

The team members involved in the HAARP-LWA lunar radar experiment are: Dr.Paul Rodriguez, Dr. Kenneth Stewart, Brian Hicks, Dr. Nagini Paravastu; and Edward Kennedy of NRL; Dr. Paul Kossey of AFRL's Research Vehicles Directorate; and Dr. Lee J Rickard of UNM.

Significant help in conducting the experiment was provided by HAARP Program Managers Paul Kossey (Air Force) and Edward Kennedy (Navy); Mike McCarrick of BAE Systems-Advanced Technologies, which operates the HAARP facility, and by Clinton Janes (UNM); Gerald O'Connell (National Radio Astronomy Observatory); and Patrick Crane
_bron

Op zondag 22 juni 2008 01:19 schreef Acinonyx het volgende:
daarom laten ze met dat haarp-ding stiekum de noordpool smelten om die ufo te pakken te krijgen

Op zondag 22 juni 2008 08:31 schreef YuckFou het volgende:

[..]

Misschien zou je de moeite moeten nemen de eerste 3/4 pagina's van dit topic door te lezen, het ding is er, ze fucken met de ionosfeer en ze geven het gewoon toe, of er zulke drastische dingen van gebeuren weet ik niet, maar t kan nooit gezond zijn....

Op zondag 22 juni 2008 09:41 schreef Erasmo het volgende:

[..]

''We hebben geen idee van wat er gebeurd maar het zal vast wel slecht zijn!''

Op zondag 22 juni 2008 09:41 schreef Erasmo het volgende:
~~''We hebben geen idee van wat er gebeurd maar het zal vast wel slecht zijn!''~~

Op zondag 22 juni 2008 22:36 schreef YuckFou het volgende:

[..]

We hebben redelijk een idee wat ze doen, we hebben redelijk wat informatie wat men met het weer wil doen en we kunnen er met alle redelijkheid vanuit gaan dat HAARP daar mee te maken heeft, en dat is zonder conspiracy-thinking, dit topic is ooit begonnen in [NWS] omdat het ding er staat, omdat het van de US military is en omdat er een PDF is waarin de US-military aangeeft in 2025 het weer te kunnen controleren.
Omdat er nogal wat out-of-the-box thinking bijkwam is er toen besloten dit topic destijds in [TRU] te zetten en daar staat t nog steeds, nou ja [BNW] intussen, maar nogmaals, dit is nou een van die dingen die waarschijnlijk wel kloppen, en t blijft jammer dat t doorlopend als een soort onzin word afgedaan, lees en informeer jezelf, kom dan graag weer eens terug.

Op zondag 22 juni 2008 22:39 schreef Erasmo het volgende:

[..]

Nou komen we ergens

Heb je een link naar die .pdf?

Op zondag 2 augustus 2009 18:28 schreef YuckFou het volgende:
Tijd voor wat nieuws om een goud van oud topic omhoog te trappen

Ik zou me er weer eens in moeten verdiepen, t ding staat er nog steeds tenslotte...misschien zijn er nieuwe PDF's te vinden, of slingert technical memorandum 195 ergens online

Okay op die laatste heb ik hulp nodig...google levert wel hits maar geen PDF en ik zou onderhand die 613 pagina's van Techy Mem 195 wel graag willen lezen...iemand nog een onontdekte database in z'n bookmarks?

HAARP PATENTS (Assigned to APTI, Inc.)

U.S. Patent 4686605:
Method And Apparatus For Altering A Region In The Earth's Atmosphere,
Ionosphere, And/Or Magnetosphere
Inventors: Eastlund; Bernard J., Spring, TX
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Los Angeles, CA
Issued: Aug. 11, 1987
Filed: Jan. 10, 1985

U.S. Patent 5038664:
Method For Producing A Shell Of Relativistic Particles At An Altitude
Above The Earth's Surface
Inventors: Eastlund; Bernard J., Spring, TX
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued: Aug. 13, 1991
Filed: Jan. 10, 1985

U.S. Patent 4712155:
Method And Apparatus For Creating An Artificial Electron Cyclotron
Heating Region Of Plasma
Inventors: Eastlund; Bernard J., Spring, TX
Ramo; Simon, Beverly Hills, CA
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Los Angeles, CA
Issued: Dec. 8, 1987
Filed: Jan. 28, 1985

U.S. Patent 5068669:
Power Beaming System
Inventors: Koert; Peter, Washington, DC
Cha; James T., Fairfax, VA
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued: Nov. 26, 1991
Filed: Sep. 1, 1988

U.S. Patent 5218374:
Power Beaming System With Printer Circuit Radiating Elements
Having Resonating Cavities
Inventors: Koert; Peter, Washington, DC
Cha; James T., Fairfax, VA
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued: June 8, 1993
Filed: Oct. 10, 1989

U.S. Patent 5293176:
Folded Cross Grid Dipole Antenna Element
Inventors: Elliot; Paul G., Vienna, VA
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued: Mar. 8, 1994
Filed: Nov. 18, 1991

U.S. Patent 5202689:
Lightweight Focusing Reflector For Space
Inventors: Bussard; Robert W., Manassas, VA
Wallace; Thomas H., Gainesville, FL
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued: Apr. 13, 1993
Filed: Aug. 23, 1991

U.S. Patent 5041834:
Artificial Ionospheric Mirror Composed Of A Plasma Layer
Which Can Be Tilted
Inventors: Koert; Peter, Washington, DC
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued: Aug. 20, 1991
Filed: May. 17, 1990

U.S. Patent 4999637:
Creation Of Artificial Ionization Clouds Above The Earth
Inventors: Bass; Ronald M., Houston, TX
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued: Mar. 12, 1991
Filed: May. 14, 1987

U.S. Patent 4954709:
High Resolution Directional Gamma Ray Detector
Inventors: Zigler; Arie, Rishon Le Zion, Israel
Eisen; Yosset, Rishon Le Zion, Israel
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Washington, DC
Issued: Sep. 4, 1990
Filed: Aug. 16, 1989

U.S. Patent 4817495:
Defense System For Discriminating Between Objects In Space
Inventors: Drobot; Adam T., Annandale, VA
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Los Angeles, CA
Issued: Apr. 4, 1989
Filed: Jul. 7, 1986

U.S. Patent 4873928:
Nuclear-Sized Explosions Without Radiation
Inventors: Lowther; Frank E., Plano, TX
Assignees: APTI, Inc., Los Angeles, CA
Issued: Oct. 17, 1989
Filed: June 15, 1987

Op donderdag 6 augustus 2009 19:34 schreef Drumpie het volgende:
Ik heb dit gezien denk ik gisteren.

Toen ik de foto's bekeek uit dit topic en nog verschillende op internet waar de wolken door dit apparaat zijn aangepast.

Want de wolken waren echt in een soort vlaag in een richting (lijkt net of ze een richting in zijn geblazen).
En de wolken waren heel klein en los van elkaar, een kwartiertje later was alles weer een geheel wolkendek.

In de avond gezien.
Geen idee of het een apparaat wat een soort HAARP is, maar je weet maar nooit.

Op donderdag 6 augustus 2009 19:56 schreef Boswachtertje het volgende:

[..]

Heb je nog een oude link van dat technical memorandum 195? Dan zou je em via archive.org kunnen terugvinden ~~nml~~ evt..
Ken je deze pdf al?
Op ATS kennen ze het memorandum niet (eens).. jammer.. dit is namelijk een apparaat wat bewezen bestaat, alleen waarvan we niet weten wat het nou precies doet - behalve dan onschuldig atmosferisch onderzoek natuurlijk..

Tis wel echt Star Wars als je de patenten zo leest
[..]

bron

Op donderdag 6 augustus 2009 20:00 schreef Prowl het volgende:

[..]

Chemtrails?

Op donderdag 6 augustus 2009 20:32 schreef ChungLingSoo het volgende:
Star Wars ? wtf ? Heb je wel eens patenten op bijvoorbeeld electronenmicroscopen gelezen ?

Ik zie werkelijk niets wat mijn aandacht zou trekken behalve misschien Nuclear-Sized Explosions Without Radiation waarvan ik het hele patent niet kan vinden maar alleen maar een omschrijving van 1 paragraaf.

Maar ik ben dan waarschijnlijk weer raar wanneer ik me afvraag waarom een supermacht een patent (wat alleen geldig is in de US) zou aanvragen op zoiets.

Als je bang moet zijn voor dingen dan zijn dat dingen waar je GEEN patent voor kan vinden.

Op donderdag 6 augustus 2009 20:32 schreef ChungLingSoo het volgende:

[..]

Star Wars ? wtf ? Heb je wel eens patenten op bijvoorbeeld electronenmicroscopen gelezen ?

Ik zie werkelijk niets wat mijn aandacht zou trekken behalve misschien Nuclear-Sized Explosions Without Radiation waarvan ik het hele patent niet kan vinden maar alleen maar een omschrijving van 1 paragraaf.

Maar ik ben dan waarschijnlijk weer raar wanneer ik me afvraag waarom een supermacht een patent (wat alleen geldig is in de US) zou aanvragen op zoiets.

Als je bang moet zijn voor dingen dan zijn dat dingen waar je GEEN patent voor kan vinden.

Raytheon through its E-Systems subsidiary now owns the patents used to develop the HAARP weather warfare facility at Gakona Alaska.
http://www.rense.com/general70/haarp.htm

Op donderdag 10 september 2009 12:30 schreef Dragorius het volgende:

[..]

Wat is hier vreemd aan? Een timelapse filmpje dat een x aantal weerfronten laat zien die met elkaar convergeren/botsen..

Op vrijdag 11 september 2009 08:41 schreef ToT het volgende:
Hey, tof te zien dat je hier weer zit te posten, kerel!

Ja dit soort wolkenvormen en -bewegingen worden vaak wel wetenschappelijk verklaard, maar ik kan me ook goed voorstellen dat je hier meer in zou kunnen zien, want het ziet er gewoon echt bizar uit.

Ik weet zelf nog niet echt wat ik er van moet denken, hoewel ik wel meer richting de reguliere verklaringen neig.

Op vrijdag 11 september 2009 08:41 schreef ToT het volgende:
Hey, tof te zien dat je hier weer zit te posten, kerel!

Eerie Cloud Created by NASA Rocket Experiment

An eerie cloud that glowed briefly in the night sky Saturday was no UFO. It was created by humans - more specifically a NASA rocket built to make clouds that shine at night.

The rocket launched as part of an experiment to artificially create so-called noctilucent - or night-shining - clouds, the highest clouds on Earth. They naturally appear around 50 miles (80 km) above Earth's high latitudes and are also known as polar mesospheric clouds.

Op maandag 28 september 2009 02:20 schreef ZureMelk het volgende:
Het is allemaal wat veel om te lezen/kijken.
Is er ergens iets met bewijs dat HAARP het weer effectief verandert?
Als het een filmpje is graag het tijdstip erbij waarbij er bewijs getoond wordt aangezien alle suggestieve bullshit niet interessant is.

Op maandag 28 september 2009 07:28 schreef YuckFou het volgende:

[..]

Filmpje met bewijs?

Uiteraard niet, er is geen enkele wetenschapper die pontificaal voor de camera verklaart dat HAARP dat kan.

Op maandag 28 september 2009 08:09 schreef UncleScorp het volgende:
Bewijs van weermanipulatie ? De kranten staan er soms vol van.

Denk maar aan de chinezen en hun Olympische Spelen
Chinese Government To Control Olympic Weather

Of Rusland, Italie, Spanje, Franrkijk en Indonesie die regen maken
http://www.teachersparadi(...)/re/regen_maken.html

Maar Amerika ? ... nah

Op maandag 28 september 2009 07:28 schreef YuckFou het volgende:

[..]

Filmpje met bewijs?

Uiteraard niet, er is geen enkele wetenschapper die pontificaal voor de camera verklaart dat HAARP dat kan. maar dat geldt evengoed voor UFO's en 9/11 wel kan je jezelf vermaken met de links uit de volgende post:
[..]

Officiele "bills"en "reports" uit de VS aangaande weathermodification, of lees alsnog t hele topic door